Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Philosophy
for
Passive Fire Protection Systems
Onshore
Document Number
TO-HQ-02-073-00
00
Final Issue
IM
31/05/05
JEA
31/05/05
A2
IM
07/02/05
JS
07/02/05
A1
DRAFT
WAM
21/12/04
GA
21/12/04
Origin
By
Date
Chkd
By
Date
Issue
Rev
PZ
03/06/05
MF
03/06/05
Appd
By
Date
Auth
By
Date
Revision History
Revision
Description of revision
AI
A2
00
Final Issue
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
2 of 16
00
CONTENTS
1.0 PREFACE .......................................................................................................................4
2.0 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................4
3.0 ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................5
4.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................5
5.0 APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS........................................5
5.1
5.2
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
3 of 16
00
1.0
PREFACE
This Philosophy defines the OMV Exploration & Production GmbH corporate
policy on the design of Passive Fire Protection (PFP) Systems for onshore
hydrocarbon production and processing facilities. The document specifies
basic requirements and criteria, defines the appropriate codes and
standards, and assists in the standardisation of facilities design across all
onshore operations.
The design process needs to consider project specific factors such as the
location, production composition, production rates and pressures, the
process selected and the size of the plant. This philosophy aims to address
a wide range of the above variables, however it is recognised that not all
circumstances can be covered. In situations where project specific
considerations may justify deviation from this philosophy, a document
supporting the request for deviation shall be submitted to OMV E&P for
approval.
Reference should be made to the parent of this philosophy, document
number TO-HQ-02-001 for information on deviation procedures and
Technical Authorities, general requirements and definitions and
abbreviations not specific to this document.
2.0
DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are relevant to this document.
Cellulosic Fire
Fire Rating
Fire Area
Hydrocarbon Fire
Hydrocarbon Jet
Fire
Intumescence
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
4 of 16
00
3.0
Muster Area
Pool Fire
Sublimation
ABBREVIATIONS
There are no abbreviations with particular relevance to this document.
4.0
INTRODUCTION
This document defines the OMV Exploration & Production GmbH corporate
policy for the design basis and philosophy of Passive Fire Protection (PFP) on
its onshore facilities.
By specifying the basic requirements and criteria, and defining the appropriate
codes and standards, this philosophy intends to guide the selection and design of
PFP Systems and standardise this process across all onshore facilities operated
by OMV.
5.0
Local Regulations,
National standards.
Design of the passive fire protection system shall comply with the standards
listed within this philosophy, however, for instances where local standards are
more onerous local standards shall apply.
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
5 of 16
00
5.1
ASTM E 515
ASTM D 635
Burning Rate and Burning Time after Ignition for Basic Epoxy
Resin
ASTM E 760
BS 476
BS 3900
BS Part 20
BS Part 21
BS Part 22
BS Part 23
ISO R 834
ISO 9001
ISO 9002
NFPA 33
NFPA 59
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
6 of 16
00
5.2
NFPA 251
NFPA 703
UL 263
UL 1709
References
IP Guidelines for the Design and Protection of
Pressure Systems to Withstand Severe Fires, (March
2003)
IP Model Code of Safe Practice, Part 19 - Fire
Precautions at Petroleum Refineries and Bulk Storage
Installations
Guidelines for Fire Protection in Chemical,
Petrochemical and Hydrocarbon Processing Facilities,
AIChemE Publication (2003)
Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection
Engineering Principles for Oil, Gas, Chemical and
Related Facilities, Dennis, P. and Nolan, P.E., Noyes
Publications (1996)
API 2510
API 2510A
TO-HQ-02-025
TO-HQ-02-071
TO-HQ-02-072
TO-HQ-02-075
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
7 of 16
00
6.0
SYSTEM GOAL
The goal of the PFP Systems shall primarily be for the protection of personnel
in the event of a fire or explosion with secondary consideration being given to
the protection of plant and equipment combined with environmental protection
requirements.The PFP Systems shall achieve their goal by:
Note: This philosophy does not consider the Fire Rating requirements for
Remote inhabited buildings.
7.0
SYSTEM BOUNDARIES
The boundaries of the PFP Systems are with the following:
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
8 of 16
00
8.0
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
It is not intended that this philosophy be used retrospectively. It should be applied
to new facilities and to major modifications and/or extensions to existing
installations/plants. This philosophy applies specifically to onshore installations in
respect to:
Risk Analysis
The decision to install PFP and the specification of the type of PFP to be
implemented shall be made following a risk analysis of major hazards and their
consequences to determine the degree of protection required for the duration of
the hazard.
In any case, the following rules shall apply:
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
9 of 16
00
PFP requirements for asset protection are not mandatory and should
be addressed by the project management team on a case by case
basis
The risk analysis should also identify the specific fire loading and duration,
which will be used to specify the appropriate PFP rating, in terms of the
following:
8.1.1
Functional Requirements
The fire resistance provided by a PFP System is expressed in terms of the
duration of protection that the system provides to the protected
structure/equipment before the first critical behaviour is observed. The choice of
PFP System should further consider the following factors:
Cost-Benefit analysis (refer to Document Number TO-HQ-02-071 Philosophy for HSEQ Management Onshore)
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
10 of 16
00
8.1.2
Performance Criteria
In terms of Fire Rating, the structure, partition or equipment protected by a PFP
System must satisfy the following three criteria under the conditions identified
during the project FERA and for a prescribed duration suitable to achieve the
safety goals identified for the plant:
8.1.3
1.
2.
Integrity: partitions shall prevent the spread of flames and hot fumes
throughout the fire exposure period.
3.
Suitability
The performance criteria and suitability of all PFP Systems shall be assured and
supported by tests conducted by independent organisations.
Reliable test reports can be obtained from the following organisations; the list
is not intended to be exhaustive and is presented here for guidance only:
Australia
France
CNPB Laboratory
CSTB Laboratory
CTICM Laboratory
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
11 of 16
00
Germany
United Kingdom
Shell Research UK
Netherlands
Norway
SINTEF
USA
8.1.4
Department of Transportation
Type Approval
Type approval of PFP materials is the issue of a certificate, based on the
findings of the testing identified in Section 8.1.3 above, stating that the
material certified is thus suitable for use in its intended application. Type
approval certification is issued by independent organisations known as
Certifying Authorities and those having international recognition are as follows:
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
12 of 16
00
8.2
Germanisher Lloyd
Design Criteria
The design criteria for the PFP Systems shall be defined with the sole purpose
of achieving the performance criteria of that which is being protected (refer to
Section 8.1.3).
8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.3
PFP Thickness
The certificate of type approval for each PFP material will specify the required
material thickness and other installation requirements (refer to Section 8.1.1)
depending on the Fire Rating, fire type, limiting core temperature/maximum
allowable surface temperature and will be specific to the PFP material under
consideration.
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
13 of 16
00
8.2.4
Duration
The required duration of protection (expressed in minutes) will depend on the
safety goals identified in section 6.0 and the findings of the FERA and EERA.
8.3
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
14 of 16
00
The chosen PFP System shall be type approved in accordance with Section
8.1.4 and its choice based on the full understanding of the performance
requirements during both normal and fire events.
9.0
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The design of PFP Systems should take account of the following:
10.0
Life cycle costs as well as the capital cost, for example testing costs,
false trip costs, commissioning and modification costs
Human factors
Selection and positioning of the correct field equipment suitable for the
process and environmental conditions
The safety system shall provide protection for normal operation and for
the conditions that may arise from an abnormal condition
MAINTENANCE IN DESIGN
The PFP Systems shall be designed taking maintainability into consideration by
simplifying maintenance and reducing maintenance costs where practical.
There should be sufficient maintenance overrides to enable parts of the PFP
Systems to be maintained and tested minimising operational down time.
The PFP Systems should be designed to allow modifications and development to
be implemented whilst minimising disruption to the process.
11.0
DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
The following project documents should be produced as a minimum to cover the
design of the safety system:
Front end engineering design (FEED):
Hierarchy drawing
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
15 of 16
00
Detailed design:
12.0
PFP System layout drawings identifying the type, extent and thickness
of proposed PFP material
Page
Onshore
TO-HQ-02-073
16 of 16
00