Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
org
http://newsletter.tarotstudies.org/2006/10/hunting-true-marseille/
The Chariot: The top of the chariot is scalloped, not parted and draped.
Justice: Her throne looks like wings.
The Wheel of Fortune: The figure on the top of the wheel looks more human.
The Hanged Man: Sticks out his tongue, and has "wings" or "fingers" hanging from his shoulders.
The Hanged Man- Jean Dodal, Jean Noblet, Nicolas Conver (click to
enlarge)
The Devil: Has a face on his belly, and holds what looks more like a
pitchfork than a torch. His wings are longer, going down to his midsection.
The Tower: The flames seem to be coming from the top of the tower
towards what seems to be the sun, an object missing in the Conver.
The Moon: The moon is full, looking directly forward, rather than to the
side.
The Sun: Seems to show a woman and a man on the Noblet, is hard to
tell for sure on the Dodal, and is probably two men/boys on the Conver.
The World: Shows a caped figure rather than a "dancer" with a scarf.
I discussed these with Jean-Michel, who was already aware of many of
these differences, and both of us continued finding more differences. There are probably just as many when comparing the Court cards as well.
And then, there were many times as well when the Noblet and the Dodal would disagree in details. One of the most striking novelties in the Noblet
deck is the depiction of the Fool with exposed genitalia! This instantly reminded me of earlier depictions of the fool with exposed "privates", and
suddenly it became frightfully clear what that animal is jumping at! Looking closely at the Fool, I could see more differences. The cane has a head at
the top, missing on the Dodal and the Conver. On the Dodal and the Conver there is a bell placed oddly along the stick of the knapsack, on the
Noblet, it is shown as actually being a part of the fools cap! This detail seems to have been lost in the Dodal and Conver. The Conver shows a row
of bells not only along the belt, but around the collar as well, the Noblet and Dodal dont.
The Fool- Jean Noblet, Jean Dodal, Nicolas Conver (click to
enlarge)
So we have these 3 old decks, and there are differences
among all of them. Id like to think that the Noblet could be
looked to as the defining guide, but I began to notice things I
still consider "wrong" with the deck. For instance, The
Charioteer has the shape, but not the detail, of the faces on his
shoulders. If the Dodal and Conver were based on it, then how
did they know the faces should be there? Why are the faces
missing on the Noblet? Maybe the Noblet and the Dodal are
based on some similar "source", but both include details, and
lose details, from that source? And what of the Conver, is there
any evidence that it was based on the "original" style and that
the Noblet and Dodal "oddities" were just further corruptions?
bottom of the card had been lost to make room for titles and numbers. The source of the Dodal was in many ways similar to the source of the Noblet,
if not in essence the same.
The Conver, like the Noblet, seemed like a complete redrawing. Its drawn with a much more sophisticated hand than the Dodal or Noblet, and willing
to either invent details, change them, or obtain them from an unknown/different source. How far back I could find any Conver style details?
I was becoming convinced that none of these decks were the "true" TdM, and started to wonder what might be learned by exploring other early
decks? Is there any evidence that the Noblet style is older than the Conver? Is there any evidence that the Dodal is based on something earlier? Is
there evidence that an earlier TdM without titles and numbers ever existed?
We needed to broaden the scope. Perhaps well have to go beyond the TdM to find the TdM. Were there examples of what seems to be two models
of the TdM that could be traced to cards before the Jean Noblet ?
like the Conver and many others, can not be traced to before 1700.
There is a possibility that the Franois Chosson Tarot, a TdM II style deck, may be dated to 1672, but the dating is controversial. If not the Chosson,
than the first known TdM II deck would be the Pierre Madeni Tarot from 1709. The famous Nicolas Conver deck from 1760 is of this style.
Both the TdM I and TdM II imagery can be found, often mixed together, after 1700. The "Tarot of Besanon" is very similar to the Marseille Tarot, it
seems to be an adaptation of the TdM that occurred sometime in the 1600s. It is immediately recognizable by the substitution of Junon and Jupiter
for the Papess and Pope. Many of the "TdB" decks show a much stronger connection to the TdM I then the TdM II. One very notable TdB deck was
created by Franois Heri in the early 1700s. Its proportions and style are very extremely similar to the Jean Noblet, in fact it is the only deck I have
ever seen that looks like a copy of the Noblet. The same cardmaker also made a TdM II style tarot, so we have an odd example of a TdB with
imagery like the TdM I being published by a cardmaker who was also familiar with the TdM II style. Depaulis states that the TdM II style seems like a
"modernization" of the TdM I.
By the mid-1700s, the TdM II style had become the standard for the TdM, although some samples of the TdM I continued to be produced. I kept
looking for more sample of TdM I style cards, especially for decks that didnt mix the two styles. I found a few, and then one day I came across a deck
that helped clear up a problem that had been bothering me.