Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Corning type SMF-28 optical fiber is the most popular fiber for HFC networks.
A single fiber consists of a glass core surrounded by a concentric glass
cladding; the two glasses have different refractive indeces so that light is
confined to the core by total internal reflection. The protective plastic jacket
is color-coded so that individual fibers can be identified in multiple-fiber
cable bundle.
Cables may contain as few as two fibers, or as many as 144.
Corning type SMF-28 optical fiber is the most popular fiber for HFC networks.
A single fiber consists of a glass core surrounded by a concentric glass
cladding; the two glasses have different refractive indeces so that light is
confined to the core by total internal reflection. The protective plastic jacket
is color-coded so that individual fibers can be identified in multiple-fiber
cable bundle.
Cables may contain as few as two fibers, or as many as 144.
Optical signal power in a fibre-optic cable is reduced by two primary mechanisms: absorption
and scattering.
Hydroxyl ions (-OH) absorb light near 2730nm, with weaker absorptions at 1390, 950 and
720nm . The hydroxyl content must be kept below 1 part per million in order for the
attenuation at 900nm to be less than 1 dB per km. Even if the water content of the fibre is
minimised, residual absorption remains from the infrared absorption of the fundamental
vibrations of the bonds that make up the glass, which occur at 730nm for boron-oxygen
bonds, 800nm for phosphorous-oxygen bonds, 900nm for silicon-oxygen bonds, and
1100nm for germanium-oxygen bonds.
Scattering occurs when the light signal bounces off atoms or other particles within the fibre
and is spread in all directions.
For glass fibres, the most significant form of scattering is Rayleigh scattering, which actually
does not quite fit the accepted definition of scattering. With this process, atoms or other
particles within the fibre fleetingly absorb the light signal and instantly re-emit it in another
direction. In this way, Rayleigh scattering appears very much like absorption, but it absorbs
and re-directs the light so quickly that it is considered scattering. Microscopic variation in
material density also enhance Rayleigh scattering.
Both scattering and absorption are cumulative. Light is absorbed and scattered continuously,
so the signal at the end of the fibre is almost never exactly the same signal as it was at the
beginning.
The graph shows that attenuation minima occur around 1310nm and 1550nm, which are the
dominant wavelengths used in HFC networks today. Typical high-grade singlemode fibre
has a loss of about 0.2 dB per km at 1550nm. If this radiation fell in the visible part of the
spectrum, and if ocean water were as transparent as modern fibre-optic cable, it would be
possible to see clearly the bottom of the Marianas Trench from the deck of a ship.
These are the primary non-linearities that affect the quality of signals in an
HFC optical link.
Items 3 (DRB) and 4 (SBS) result in an increase in noise in an optical
transmission system, and item 1 (Chromatic dispersion) result in Composite
Second-Order distortion. The other items (2, 5 and 6) give rise to cross-talk
between signals in a multi-wavelength transmission link. These effects will
be discussed in more detail in other presentations.
Lon Brillouin; French-American physicist.
Lord Rayleigh; British physicist.
Sir Chandrasekhar Venkata Raman; Indian physicist and mathematician.
The analogue and digital video signals, and the high-speed (Internet) and VoIP
traffic are multiplexed and transported through the HFC network using Frequency
Division Multiplexing (FDM). That is, each analogue or digital signal is assigned a
unique channel frequency. This is exactly the same method that is used in
terrestrial television and radio broadcasting. A set-top box must tune to a specific
channel frequency in order to receive an analogue or digital signal.
Broadcast traffic consists of all the analogue and digital video signals that are
available to all subscribers at all times. They can be compared to Multicast
transmissions.
Narrowcast traffic consists of all the interactive signals. (Video on Demand, Internet
traffic, and VoIP). These signals are targeted at specific customers, and therefore
they can be compared to Unicast transmissions.
(NOTE: the diplex crossover is an unusable part of the spectrum created by the
filter modules which separate the downstream and upstream signal paths in active
devices such as optical nodes and amplifiers. The actual frequency limits of the
downstream and upstream spectra differ from region to region: the figures shown
here are typical of Latin American countries. Cisco and other HFC manufacturers
have recently introduced a system which allows more bandwidth in the upstream
signal path. The diplex crossover in this new system is 85 to 105 MHz).
State-of-the-art HFC networks have a downstream maximum frequency of 1,000
MHz. This provides capacity for 153 signal channels, each 6 MHz wide. In general,
analogue video signals are restricted to frequencies below 550 MHz. This allows
for 78 analog video channels. The reamining bandwidth can accommodate 75
QAM signals.
10
11
12
In order to calculate the new RF input level, we must begin with the power of
a modulated analog video signal in a 6 MHz channel. Using the 1310nm
transmitter example, the recommended Peak Envelope Power (which is the
power of an unmodulated carrier) is 15.0 dBmV. The average power in a 6
MHz channel, when the carrier is modulated with active video, will be
approximately 3 dB less, or 12.0 dBmV.
13
Most vendors (including Cisco) and HFC network operators now recommend
a difference in level of 6 dB between the Peak Envelope Power of an
analog video signal, and the power (total, in a 6 MHz channel) of a digital
signal.
It is still possible, however, to find HFC networks in which 64QAM signals are
at a level of -10 dB, relative to analog Peak Envelope Power, and 256QAM
signals are at -6 dB.
Again using the example of the 1310nm Prisma II transmitter, the
recommended RF input level for the reference channel load is 15.0 dBmV
(analog Peak Envelope Power), and therefore the digital (QAM) signals will
have a level of 15 6 = 9 dBmV.
14
Many experiments have been conducted to show that this basic principle is
valid.
The recommended RF input level, for the reference channel load, is
designed to optimize the performance of the laser. That is to say, it
achieves maximum CNR while ensuring that the laser operates in its linear
region, and certainly does not produce clipping.
When the channel load is changed, the total RF input power will change. It
must therefore be adjusted so that it is equal to the total power with the
reference channel load.
15
The total power of the analog video signals and the digital signals must be
calculated separately, then added on the basis of absolute power and
converted back to dBmV. In this example, the total power of the combined
analog and digital signals is 32.6 dBmV.
16
17
When the number of analog video signals is reduced to 30, and the number
of digital (QAM) signals is increased to 123, the transmitter input level can
be changed, so that the total power remains the same.
If the new peak envelope power of an analog signal is z, then the total
power of the analog signals can be calculated, as shown, and also the total
power of the digital signals. When these are added (on a power basis, of
course), we find that the total composite power is z plus 16.6 dBmV.
As stated, this must be equal to the total composite reference power, which
was 32.6 dBmV. Therefore z = 16 dBmV.
This means that the peak envelope power of an analog signal, with the new
channel-load, will 16 dBmV; an increase of 1 dB.
18
This is a simplified formula for calculating the required change in the peak
envelope power of an analog signal, when the numbers of analog and
digitals are changed.
This formula also allows the user to modify the values of d and m, in the
event that digital signals are not at -6 dB relative to peak analog envelope
power, and there is disagreement regarding the amount of power reduction
when an analog carrier is modulated. (Some system operators choose m =
6 dB).
AS stated earlier, numerous experiments have shown that this procedure is
valid. When the number of analog signals is decreased, and the number of
digital signals is increased, there will be a reduction in composite power at
the transmitter input. The power can therefore be increased, resulting in an
improved Carrier-to-Noise Ratio, without increasing the second- and thirdorder distortions in the overall optical link.
IMPORTANT NOTE: this procedure cannot be applied to the RF
components in an HFC network. The tilt of the signals in a typical RF
amplifier introduces a great deal of complexity and uncertainty.
19
20
21
22
23
This slide illustrates the optimum performance of the transmitter. The input
current to the laser is maximized but, at the peaks of the signal, the laser is
not driven into a non-linear region.
At this point, the input signal is generating 100% Optical Modulation Index
(OMI). Any further increase in input level will drive the laser into nonlinearity.
24
When the OMI exceeds 100%, the laser is driven into a non-linear region of
the curve, and the output signal is distorted. In particular, the laser output
will be extinguished (driven below the threshold) at the peaks of the input
signal.
The result is a complex mixture of distortions that appear as Noise.
25
26
27
With simple mathematics, then, we can calculate the power of each DOCSIS
signal so that the transmitter will be operated at the maximum possible
input power (100% OMI; which maximizes the CNR).
But we must consider the signal peaks, which are the cause of laser clipping.
The ratio of the peak value to the rms value (also called the Peak Factor) of
a noise-like DOCSIS signal is not the same as the peak factor for a sinewave. The sine-wave has a constant and well-defined peak factor of 3dB.
What is the ratio for a noise-like signal from a Cable Modem?
And what allowance should be made for the Ingress noise, which also adds
to the power input to the transmitter?
28
29
This method ensures that the laser in the transmitter is operated at its
optimum performance: close to (but not exceeding) 100%, so that the CNR
is maximized, without causing laser clipping.
The problem, of course, is that we do not know whether the traffic will
increase in the future, and we cannot account for the effects of ingress
noise (RF interference).
30
31
The Noise Power Ratio (NPR) test is designed to fully load a device or
system with a broad spectrum of white (gaussian) noise, and to determine
the degree of Intermodulation Distortion created by this noise signal, as its
level is increased.
32
33
The graph in this slide shows the variation in NPR versus the input level to
the device or system under test. (NPR is expressed as the ratio between
the carrier and the combined thermal and intermodulation noise).
At low input levels, the intrinsic (thermal) noise of the device or system is
dominant, and an increase in the white noise input level leads to an
improvement in NPR (1 dB for 1 dB). This is the linear portion of the NPR
curve.
A point is reached, however, when Intermodulation noise begins to appear in
the notch, and the curve is no longer linear. Increases in input level
produce increasing deviations from the straight line. This is the transition
portion of the NPR curve.
Finally, the Intermodulation noise is completely dominant, and an increase in
the white noise input level causes a decrease in the NPR, in the nonlinear
portion of the curve. The slope of the curve in this region will indicate the
dominant order of the Intermodulation products.
34
35
Although a peak factor of 9.5 dB is reasonable for a single QAM signal, the
peak factor for white noise in the entire Upstream spectrum (5 to 42 MHz)
may be much larger. In fact, in Cable Telecommunications Testing
Guidelines (ANSI/SCTE 96 2008), the peak factor of the noise is expected
to be at least 13dB.
36
37
38
This HFC architecture applies only to Upgrade projects, in which the existing
network has a Trunk and Feeder architecture with a large number of
amplifiers in each cascade. (Perhaps five or six). In these architectures, the
Trunk had lower RF signal levels than the Feeder, and it will be advisable to
maintain these differences in the Upgrade.
The reason for this difference in level is that the Trunk must maintain high
quality (low distortion) as the signal passes through a relatively large
number of amplfiiers. The Feeder, on the other hand, must maintain a
higher level, in order to provide signal to as many subscribers as possible.
Note that this architecture employs the concept of unity gain: the output
levels of all the amplifiers in the Trunk are identical. This greatly simplifies
record-keeping and maintenance.
Upstream RF signal levels always obey the unity gain principle, as shown.
In an architecture which draws a distinction between trunk and feeder, the
trunk will have lower RF signal levels than the feeder. This is done to
reduce distortion accumulation in the trunk, which may consist of a cascade
of four, five or six amplifiers, while maintaining a high level for the feeder,
which has to deliver signal to as many potential subscribers as possible.
This architecture is a direct descendant of the old Trunk and Feeder (or Tree
and Branch) designs that characterised the all-coaxial systems before the
development of low-cost and reliable optics
39
40
41
42
In the amplifier data-sheets, the gain of the amplifier, and its internal tilt, is
specified.
These figures refer to the performance of amplifier when the input pad value
is 1dB and the input equalizer value is 0dB.
This is because a 0dB equalizer is simply a jumper with no loss, but all other
values of equalizer have 1dB loss at 1 GHz. Therefore, in all real situations,
there will be a minimum loss of 1dB at 1GHz: the gain specification of the
amplifier (as stated in the data-sheet) takes this loss into account.
43
We always begin with the required RF signal levels at the output of the
amplifier: these levels determine the reach of the amplifier (the length of
coaxial cable that can be installed between this amplifier and the next), and
the number of subscribers that can receive signals from the amplifier (a
higher level allows more subscribers to be connected). HOWEVER, higher
output levels also cause more distortion.
The gain of the amplifier, in the data-sheet, is always specified at the highest
frequency (1 GHz, in this example). But the internal tilt of the amplifier
means that the gain will be less at the lowest frequency (54 MHz in this
example). Therefore, if the gain of the amplifier at 1 GHz is 43dB, and the
internal tilt is 14.5dB, the gain at 54 MHz will be (43 14.5) = 28.5dB.
Now it is possible to calculate the required input levels.
44
Assume that each amplifier in this network has the same RF output levels as
the previous amplifier. This is standard practice, and is called the unity gain
principle.
In this example, the coaxial cable has 37dB loss at 1 GHz, and 8dB loss at
54 MHz. Therefore the actual input levels to the next amplifier are as
shown. Of course, they do not match the required input levels.
NOTE: this diagram also shows the benefit of having a large positive tilt at
the output of an amplifier: if we did not, then the signal level at 1 GHz would
be very low, resulting in poor CNR.
45
Now we know the required amplifier input levels, and the actual input levels,
we can easily calculate the values of the input pad and equalizer that will
convert the actual levels to the required levels.
In this example, the required values are:
Input pad: 6dB
Input equalizer: 14.5dB tilt.
46
47
48
This table shows that, as the number of upstream bonded channels and
modulation complexity increase, the maximum output level required for a
DOCSIS 3.0-compliant cable modem decreases.
(NOTE: the levels required for DOCSIS 2.0 modems are the same as those
for TWO bonded channels in a DOCSIS 3.0 modem).
This means that an HFC network intended for high-speed DOCSIS 3.0
service must be designed to accommodate the lowest maximum cable
modem output levels.
49
The maximum required transmit level for a DOCSIS 3.0 compliant cable
modem is 51 dBmV, if it is transmitting four bonded channels and using the
most complex modulation schemes for highest throughput. However, it is
not good practice to design the HFC network with this maximum level in
mind: any inaccuracies in design and construction, and changes in
attenuation due to temperature fluctuations, may require the modem to
exceed this level, and this can lead to failure of the modem to register
when it is first installed. Therefore, a backoff is recommended. In this
example, the maximum design level is assumed to be 47 dBmV.
In calculating the total attenuation of the Drop system, it is necessary to
consider the worst case scenario, as represented here. In many homes,
there will be an RF splitter to allow connection of several TVs, Set-Top
Boxes, and the Cable Modem. Also, the maximum drop-cable length should
be assumed to be 50m (150 ft.). Thus, the RF signal level arriving at a tap
port will be about 38 dBmV.
50
This slide shows an example of a portion of the feeder plant, designed for a
downstream upper frequency limit of 1000 MHz using 0.625 inch coaxial
cable. If no constraints are employed during the upstream system design,
and if standard (symmetrical) taps are installed, it is possible to find that
the modem transmission levels will cover a significant range, and the lower
levels may result in poor carrier-to-ingress ratios. It will also be seen that
the highest levels are above the design level for DOCSIS 3.0 cable
modems that was calculated in the previous slide.
This diagram shows the reverse signal level required, at the tap port, to
provide a signal of 13 dBmV at the input to the amplifier. The highest level
is 42.8 dBmV, and the lowest is 23.5 dBmV. There is therefore a range, or
window of reverse levels, of 19.3 dB.
51
52
By adding reverse window taps and an upstream pad in the LEQ/RC, the
upstream window can be further reduced, to 4.3 dB.
The reverse window taps are asymmetric: they have higher loss at higher
frequencies than low. This allows the cable modems to transmit at a lower
level. They are installed at the beginning of the feeder only. This solves the
problem that was evident in the two previous slides.
53
The answer to this question is Yes, but at this time there is no precise
method of calculating the increase in level.
The reason is that, at high output levels, amplifiers produce distortions which
cannot be computed using the standard methods which apply to CSO
(Composite Second Order) and CTB (Composite Triple Beat) products. This
will be explained in the following slides.
54
Here is a review the structure of the traffic in the coaxial cable network.
Unless instructed otherwise by a customer, Systems Engineers will assume a
full-spectrum traffic load for the purpose of analyzing system
performance. In most Western Hemisphere countries, this is understood
to mean 78 analog video channels between 50 and 550 MHz, and about
75 digital (QAM) signals between 550 and 1000 MHz. In the majority of
HFC networks, the power of a digital channel is set at 6 dB below the
power of an unmodulated analog video carrier at the same frequency, as
shown in this diagram.
55
To simplify the discussion, we will remove the tilt in this and the following
diagrams, and focus on the Second- and Third-Order distortion effects.
For analog video signals, most of the power of the modulated signal is
concentrated close to the video carrier, and consists of the synchronizing
pulses and the lower-frequency luminance components.
56
Because most of the analog video signal power is concentrated close to the
carrier, intermodulation between analog signals results in distortion
products that also have a fairly narrow bandwidth, and that can be easily
seen on a spectrum analyzer and distinguished from noise.
Composite Triple-Beat distortion products lie at frequencies that are at, or
close to, the analog video carrier frequencies.
Composite Second-Order distortion products lie at 0.75 and 1.25 MHz
relative to the carrier frequencies. (Most of the accumulation is at 1.25
MHz).
57
58
High RF signal levels are desirable, because this allows more subscribers to
be powered by each RF amplifier. This in turn results in fewer amplifiers,
and reduced equipment and maintenance costs to the customer.
However, as RF levels increase, the distortion products also increase. Note
that, for every 1 dB increase in signal level, CTB distortion products
increase by 2 dB.
59
60
The power of a digital (QAM) signal is spread evenly across the 6 MHz
channel, unlike an analog video signal. This means that the products of
intermodulation between digital signals do not produce discernible beats:
rather, the distortion products are spread across a band of frequencies, and
cannot be distinguished from the familiar thermal noise. Therefore the
combined effect of second- and third-order distortion produced by digital
signals is referred to as Composite Intermodulation noise (CIN).
With low and moderate RF signal levels, the CIN is also at a low level, and
does not add appreciably to the thermal noise.
61
As signal level is increased, the CIN increases, and adds to the thermal
noise, causing an increase in the total (Composite) noise. The ratio of the
signal level to the composite noise level is referred to as the Carrier-toComposite Noise (CCN) ratio.
62
We are not aware of any simple and reliable mathematical procedure that can
predict the amount of CIN that will produced by a particular traffic load at a
particular RF level. However, two important observations have been made
during testing of a large number of amplifiers and nodes:
1. The amount of CIN produced by a particular traffic load at a particular RF
level (and tilt) varies significantly from one amplifier or node to another.
2. After CIN begins to show itself as an increase in the composite noise, any
further increase in RF signal level will produce a disproportionate increase
in CIN.
The result of these two effects is that, when amplifiers or nodes are operated
at high RF levels, there is a danger that a small increase in signal level
could cause a dramatic increase in CIN, and a correspondingly large
reduction in CCN.
63
This graph summarizes the effects that were shown in the previous slides.
In general, as amplifier output level is increased, the traditional Carrier-toNoise Ratio will also increase.
However, the Composite Intermodulation Noise (CIN) also increases, so that
the composite Carrier-to Noise ratio (CCN) decreases.
The CCN ratio can decrease very rapidly, as amplifier output levels are
increased. It is an avalanche effect.
64
65
66
If the RF output levels of all amplifiers in the cascade are increased by 2 dB,
the CCN will be approximately 48 dB. This is acceptable to most customers.
But if the levels increase by 2 dB for any reason, the CCN will be reduced
to 40 dB. This is a 8 dB reduction in CCN for a 2 dB increase in RF signal
level.
67
68
69
70