Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Scott Hinckley
From:
LordofSatire [Iordofsatire@gmail.com]
Wednesday, July 22, 2015 9:28 AM
Scott Hinckley
Thomas Goulden
Service
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
tx \-tT~)..\
-
)
)
Plainliff.
)
)
)
)
RDU
)
)
Defendants.
--------------_.)
CEHTlFICATE
OF SF:RVICE
COMES NOW SCOll I Iinckley. pro per. a named bllt not yel served defendant
case,
IIll\'illg
in lhis
appeared spl'cially and without conceding or waiving any right to include. without
lIol"Umcnt
Or Sl."rvicc
tnlc
and correct copie:; of my special appcarnncc in this case. notice to join in and adupl as if it were
m)'
\1\\11
complaim (ECf
:-'101;011
Plaintifl's
ro Plaintiffs
alllended
motion for ortler for J)laillti ff to appear and shmv cause (ECf 19), and this ccrtiticat~ of service
liled ".ilh Ihis collrt on I'lainliffto
Washington
Elkridge. Mf) 21705 by personally placing same io the First Cia." mail of the lJnited Stales
Postal Service wilh proper postage anixed.
QI\
7 ~~es
Now, Scott? Let's get serious. Did you file this document with the court?
WILLlA;\'l :'>1.SCIIf\IALFELDT.
\1
sjhinckley@comcast.r
If you did NOT file this and that is NOT your signature, then you need to ask your police to launch an
investigation into who is filing documents on your behalf,
The is the envelope your filings arrived in. Are you claiming you did not send it?
II
~~s~
~~-i\\~\\\\\\\~\\\\~\,\\\\"
0 :::~-" \
l
l_,_...
tv' .
S"c.h".,,~
..
.\~e\ ~-\-
W",>\...;.""")\o~ ~\\lC-\
1-\ \(r;~e-
Lo\- 7 \
-a 1"7el 5
M iJ
Gl\O,S
On Time
Expected Delivery Day: Monday, July 20,2015
Features:
Frrst-elass Mail'8
Certified Mail ~
Return Receipt
pm
STATUS OF ITEM
LOCATION
Delivered
ELKRIDGE, MD 21075
Your Item was delIVered at 12:18 pm on July 20, 2015 In ELKRIDGE, MD 21075.
am
Out
tor Delivery
ELKRIDGE, MD 21075
Sorting Complete
ELKRIDGE, MD 21075
Arrived at Un~
ELKRIDGE, MD 21075
pm
LINTHICUM
HEIGHTS, MD 21090
pm
BOSTON, MA 02205
BOSTON, MA 02205
12:09 am
pm
WESTBOROUGH,
MA01581
pm
Acceptance
WESTBOROUGH.
MA 01581
__
:;I'
-q
II,....tJ.
(iJ)
"
Ayer
"
<!It
0)
JI'
.0'i;
Littleta,n'
/
.-
--
I
\
Harvard
I.
Westford
"....
Sl)irley, MA
)
Leominster
~'
-'
lchburg
40 mm
-I'
7h (milt'S
g.
-'
".
WI :ftfN,;OIIO
,
~
"
Hudson'
,
y
1
"
0)
~48min
:i3:i miles
.,
).
t
~
(lID
,-(..
I .
,.
'.ra .Qingharn ~
Ircester
Ashland
iUrI!
)it
@
In the case of Mr. Grady and Hinckley, this is a message from one pro-se in a lawsuit to two
othcr pro-sc's in the same casco
In the case ofWJJ Hoge, this is a legal communication, not subject to the Maryland harassment
statute.
Notice.
I have just filed a copyright application for the photo of Gail in the hospital. As I know who I
sent thc photo to, that means eithcr a law enforcemcnt officer dceided to risk his job by scanning
it and sending it to Grady for his blog, or either Mr. Hoge or Mr. Hinckley sent it to Grady.
Grady has published portions of the photo. Not enough to file a claim. However, be on notice
that if the photo is published I will immediately file a copyright infringement suit against Mr.
Grady, Mr. Hoge and Mr, Hinckley.
Mr. Hoge and Mr. Hinckley can help each other by revealing which of them was responsible for
sending the photo to Thinking Man's Zombie.
This is not a bluff. I sent that photo to demonstrate to the police, Hoge and Hinckley the human
tragedy these offensive bloggers were exploiting.
The copyright application is filed, and I do not want to see that picture on anyone's website.
I hope I am clear,
Bill Schmalfeldt