Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Review
Biodegradable lms
and composite
coatings: past,
present and future
R.N. Tharanathan
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Central
Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-570
013, India (tel: +91-821-514876; fax: +91-821517233; e-mail: tharanathan@yahoo.co.uk)
Introduction
Food packaging, an important discipline in the area
of food technology, concerns preservation and protection of all types of foods and their raw materials, as well
from oxidative and microbial spoilage. Petrochemical
based plastics such as polyolens, polyesters, polyamides, etc. have been increasingly used as packaging
materials, because of their availability in large quantities
at low cost and favourable functionality characteristics
such as good tensile and tear strength, good barrier
properties to O2 and aroma compounds and heat sealability. On the contrary they have a very low water
vapour transmission rate and most importantly they are
totally non-biodegradable, and therefore lead to environmental pollution, which pose serious ecological problems. Hence, their use in any form or shape has to be
restricted and may be even gradually abandoned to circumvent problems concerning waste disposal (Tharanathan & Saroja, 2001). Of late, there is a paradigm
shift imposed by the growing environmental awareness
by all to look for packaging lms and processes, which
are biodegradable and therefore compatible with the
environment. In a sense, biodegradability is not only a
functional requirement but also an important environmental attribute. Thus, the concept of biodegradability
enjoys both user-friendly and eco-friendly attributes,
and the raw materials are essentially derived from either
replinishable agricultural feedstocks or marine food
processing industry wastes, and therefore it capitalizes
on natural resource conservation with an underpinning
on environmentally friendly and safe atmosphere. An
additional advantage of biodegradable packaging
materials is that on biodegradation or disintegration and
composting they may act as fertilizer and soil conditioner, facilitating better yield of the crops. Though a bit
expensive, biopackaging is tomorrows need for packaging especially for a few value added food products.
Food, either in its processed form or in the raw
material stage, depending upon its water activity and
temperature of storage is highly perishable and therefore needs a careful technological intervention to preserve it longer. Quality food preservation is a serious
concern in the present day food processing operations.
The post harvest losses of our farm produce, for example, the fruits and vegetables are signicant, ranging
from 15 to 20%. These losses are mainly due to
0924-2244/03/$ - see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00280-7
72
improper handling and unsound post-harvest technologies being practiced. Transportation from the production center to far o places for marketing accounts for
additional losses due to spoilage. Availability of farm
produce with freshness, enhanced shelf-life, better avour/aroma and textural characteristics with a higher
nutritional value is the need of the day.
Packaging lms
The commonly used packaging lms are shown in
Table 1. Although a total replacement of synthetic
plastics by the biodegradable materials is just impossible, at least for some specic applications such a
replacement seems obvious and useful. Towards this
end, there exists a huge business opportunity. Nevertheless, such a replacement by biodegradable materials
would also allow us preserve or extend our expensive,
dwindling petroleum resources, and helps us save on
our foreign exchange. Essential prerequisites of a good
packaging lm (Kader, 1989) are:
1. allow for a slow but controlled respiration
(reduced O2 absorption) of the commodity;
2. allow for a selective barrier to gases (CO2) and
water vapour;
3. creation of a modied atmosphere with respect to
internal gas composition, thus regulating the
ripening process and leading to shelf-life extension;
4. lessening the migration of lipidsof use in confectionery industry;
5. maintain structural integrity (delay loss of
chlorophyll) and improve mechanical handling;
6. serve as a vehicle to incorporate food additives
(avour, colours, antioxidants, antimicrobial
agents) and
7. prevent (or reduce) microbial spoilage during
extended storage.
Monomeric unit
Characteristics
Polyethylene
Polyvinylidene
Polyester
Polyamide (Nylon)
Cellophane
Ethylene
Vinylidene
Ethyleneglycol+terephthalic acid
Diamine+various acids
Glucose (cellulose)
Desirable
Desirable
Desirable
Desirable
Desirable
73
74
Fig. 2. Chemical structures of (a) cellulose, (b) amylose, (c) chitosan and (d) pullulan.
75
Methylcellulose
13,000
20,000
41,000
O2
Water Tensile
ml.m/ vapour strength
m2 s.Pa ng. m/ (MPa)
m2 s.Pa
3.1
3.6
4.6
Hydroxypropyl cellulose
100,000
3.0
370,000
3.2
LDPE
11.32
Elongation
(%)
0.084
0.094
0.103
55.62
56.15
61.15
11.16
18.51
20.71
0.052
0.059
0.006
14.79
32.76
15.32
203.53
13.127.6 100965
76
with synthetic plastics or starch (Ke & Sun, 2000) produce excellent packaging lms.
PHB is a thermoplastic biopolyester accumulated as a
reserve of carbon and energy by a number of bacteria
(Lee, 1996). Its exceptional stereo-chemical regularity
leads to progressive crystallization with aging, thus
making it brittle. This has been overcome by incorporation of comonomers by grafting. For example,
copolymers of PHB with 3-hydroxyvalerate are produced by using specic additives in the growth medium
(Byrom, 1992). Such an approach, though improves the
properties of PHB, is not cost eective, because the
copolymer costs are higher, and its toxicity leads to
lower production yields and also its presence aects
PHB crystallization kinetics, which results in longer
processing cycle times. Nevertheless, PHB could be
toughened by the process of annealing by conditioning
in an oven, a process that widens its application possibilities (De Koning & Lemstra, 1993). To overcome the
escalating cost economics, genetically engineered plants
harboring the bacterial PHA biosynthesis genes are
being developed (Lee, 1996), which hopefully may turnout PHAs competitive with the conventional plastics.
The polymorphic Aureobasidium pullulans secretes a
polysaccharide pullulans, which is commercially a useful
hydrocolloid of value (Seviour, Stasinopoulos, Auer, &
Gibbs, 1992). It can be extruded as lms, which are
biodegradable, it is resistant to oils and grease, has
excellent O2 permeability rates and is nontoxic. It is an
a-glucan consisting of repeating maltotriose residues
joined by 1,6-linkages (Fig. 2). Pullulan is of use in biodegradable packaging lm industry.
Free standing lms have been prepared from chitosan
and its derivatives, and their mechanical, barrier and
biodegradation characteristics studied (Kittur, Kumar,
& Tharanathan, 1998). Cross-linked chitosan lms oer
greater strength and resistance for handling. By being
antifungal and antimicrobial, chitosan-based lms and
coating formulations have additional value addition
(Tharanathan & Kittur, in press). Chitosan-based composite coating formulations (Kittur, Saroja, Habibunnisa, & Tharanathan, 2001) as well as lms
(Srinivasa et al., 2002) have been shown to prolong the
shelf-life of banana, mango and capsicum. Application
of chitosan induces the production of plant defence
enzymes such as chitinase. A composite formulation
called Nutri-Save, based on derivatized chitosan, is
extensively used for shelf-life extension of apples, pears,
pomegranates, etc.
Proteinaceous hydrocolloids of plant and animal origin are used in some specic coating formulations. They
provide a good barrier to O2 and CO2, but not to water.
Nevertheless, such lms supplement the nutritional
value of coated food. Zein, the corn protein fraction,
upon casting from aqueous aliphatic alcoholic solutions
form tough, glossy and grease-resistant lms. By adding
77
78
tem, and save our world from growing ecological pollution caused by non-biodegradable plastics, which are
essentially petroleum-based. A number of aerobic and
anaerobic microorganisms have been identied for biodegradation. The carbon cycle involving the biopolymer
degradation is shown in Fig. 6.
Future strategy
Synthetic polymers are gradually being replaced by
biodegradable materials especially those derived from
replenishable, natural resources. More than the origin,
the chemical structure of the biopolymer that determines its biodegradability. Use of such biopackagings
will open up potential economic benets to farmers and
agricultural processors. Bilayer and multicomponent
lms resembling synthetic packaging materials with
excellent barrier and mechanical properties need to be
developed. Cross-linking, either chemically or enzymatically, of the various biomolecules is yet another
approach of value in composite biodegradable lms.
Innovative techniques of preserving food safety and
structural-nutritional integrity as well as complete
biodegradability must be adopted. Eventually biopackaging constitutes a niche market and that will be
our future. Sustained multidisciplinary research eorts
by chemists, polymer technologists, microbiologists,
chemical engineers, environmental scientists and
bureaucrats are needed for a successful implementation
and commercialization of biopolymer-based ecofriendly packaging materials. Undoubtedly, biodegradation oers an attractive route to environmental
waste management.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Mr. A.B. Vishu Kumar for excellent assistance in type setting the manuscript.
References
The Science (1997). Editorial article, 12 October
Arvanitoyannis, I., Nakayama, A., & Aiba, S. (1998). Edible lms
made from hydroxypropyl starch and gelatin and plasticized by
polyols and water. Carbohydrate Polymers, 36, 105119.
Byrom, D. (1992). Production of poly-b-hydroxybutyrate-polybhydroxy valerate copolymers. FEMS Microbiological Reviews,
103, 247250.
De Koning, G. T. M., & Lemstra, P. J. (1993). Crystallization phenomena in bacterial poly[(R)-3-huydroxybutyrate]: 2. Embrittlement and rejuvenation. Polymer, 34, 40894094.
Dennenberg, R. J., Bothast, R. J., & Abbot, T. P. (1978). A new biodegradable plastic made from starch graft poly(methylacrylate)
copolymer. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 22, 459465.
Doane, W. M. (1992). USDA research on starch-based biodegradable plastics. Staerke, 44, 293295.
Fang, Q., & Hanna, M. A. (2000). Functional properties of polylactic
acid-starch-based loose ll packaging lms. Cereal Chemistry, 77,
779783.
Fishman, M.L., Friedman, R.B., & Huang, S.J. (Eds.) (1994). Polymers
from agricultural coproducts. ACS Symposium series 575.
Washington, DC: American Chemical Society
Garcia, M. A., Martino, M. N., & Zanitzky, N. E. (2000). Microstructural characterization of plasticized starch-based lms.
Staerke, 52, 118124.
Hood, L. L. (1987). Collagen in sausage casings. Advances in Meat
Research, 4, 109129.
Kader, A. A. (1989). Modied atmosphere packaging of fruits and
vegetables. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 28, 130.
Kaya, S., & Kaya, A. (2000). Microwave drying eects on properties
of whey protein isolate edible lms. Journal of Food Engineering,
43, 9196.
Ke, T., & Sun, X. (2000). Physical properties of poly-(lactic acid) and
starch composites with various blending ratios. Cereal Chemistry, 77, 761768.
Kittur, F. S., Kumar, K. R., & Tharanathan, R. N. (1998). Functional
packaging properties of chitosan lms. Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel Unterschung and Forsuchung, A, 206, 4447.
Kittur, F. S., Saroja, N. S., Habibunnisa, & Tharanathan, R. N. (2001).
Polysaccharide based composite coating formulations for shelflife extension of fresh banana and mango. European Food
Research and Technology, 213, 306311.
Krochta, J.M., Baldwin, E.A., & Nisperos-Carriedo, M.O. (Eds.) (1994).
Edible coatings and lms to improve food quality. Basel: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc
Lee, S. Y. (1996). Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biotechnology
and Bioengineering, 49, 114.
Meixueir, F. A., vanGarcia, C., & Silvestre, F. (2000). Biodegradable
lms from isolate of sunower (Helianthus annus) proteins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 30323036.
Narayan, R. (1993). Biodegradable plastics in opportunities for innovation: Biotechnology. National Institute of Standards and Technology Monograph, NIST-GCR-93-633, 135
Nisperes-Carriedo, M. O., Baldwin, E. A., & Shaw, P. E. (1992).
Development of edible coating for extending post-harvest life of
selected fruits and vegetables. Proceedings of Florida State Horticultural Science, 104, 122125.
Saroja, N., Shamala, T. R., & Tharanathan, R. N. (2000). Biodegradation of starch-g-polyacrylonitrile, a packaging material by
Bacillus cereus. Process Biochemistry, 36, 119125.
Savenkova, L., Gercberga, Z., Nikolaeva, V., Dzene, A., Bibers, I., &
Kalmin, M. (2000). Mechanical properties and biodegradation
characteristics of poly-(hydroxy butyrate)-based lms. Process
Biochemistry, 35, 573579.
Seviour, R. J., Stasinopoulos, S. J., Auer, D. P. F., & Gibbs, P. A.
(1992). Production of pullulan and other exopolysaccharides by
lamentous fungi. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 12, 279298.
Shogren, R. L., Fanta, G. F., & Doane, W. M. (1993). Development of
starch based plasticsa reexamination of selected polymer
systems in historical perspective. Staerke, 45, 276280.
Srinivasa, P.C., Revathy, B., Ramesh, M.N., Harish Prashanth, K.V.,
& Tharanathan, R.N. (2002). Storage studies of mango packed
using biodegradable chitosan lms. Storage Technology, 215,
504508.
Tharanathan, R. N. (1995). Starchthe polysaccharide of high
abundance and usefulness. Journal of Scientic and Industrial
Research, 54, 452458.
Tharanathan, R. N. (2002). Food derived carbohydratesstructural
complexity and functional diversity. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 22, 6584.
Tharanathan, R.N. & Kittur, F.S. (in press). Chitinthe undisputed
biomolecule of great potential. Critical Reviews in Food Science
and Nutrition
Tharanathan, R. N., & Saroja, N. (2001). Hydrocolloid-based packaging lmsalternate to synthetic plastics. Journal of Scientic
and Industrial Research, 60, 547559.
Tharanathan, R. N., Srinivasa, P. C., & Ramesh, M. N. (2002). A
process for production of biodegradable lms from polysaccharides. Indian patent 0085/DEL/02.