Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction.
The use of RNAV (GNSS) as an alternative to traditional ground based radio navigational
guidance is an exciting development within the aviation and airline industry. The use RNAV
represents a significant development towards the use of GNSS technologies as a replacement
to traditional ILS / MLS precision approaches. Although the use of GNSS for precision
approach has still to be accepted by the International community for many reasons, the likely
date being not until the year 2015. However, the use of RNAV for non-precision approaches
still represents an important milestone in the transition from traditional navigational techniques
to satellite based technology. The use of RNAV for non-precision approaches has significant
benefits as it provides a cost effective navigation solution to runways that have no traditional
navigational infrastructure.
Operational Considerations.
A non - precision approach traditionally uses a ground based navigation facility providing the
aircraft with a bearing and distance to a fixed point, usually on the airport. The aircraft uses
this guidance information along with a published procedure (national AIP and / or Jeppeson) to
fly to an altitude on the approach to the airport, this will normally be to a minimum decision
height (MDH) of between 300ft 400ft. This is however dependent on the surrounding terrain.
This type of approach is reliant on ground base infrastructure being available and to an
acceptable signal quality to provide aircraft guidance within a declared tolerance.
The use of RNAV for non-precision approach requires an aircraft to be fitted with a GNSS
airborne receiver that is certified to FAA TSO C129a Class A1 (standalone) standards or
B1/B3 for Flight Management System (FMS) integrated equipment. RNAV (GNSS) approach
mode can only be selected when using a certified (ie Jeppeson) database. It is not possible to
use manually inputted waypoints, except for flight inspection.
The tolerances applied to an aircraft making a NPA are an alarm limit of 550m, with 10
seconds to alarm at the declared MDH. GNSS position fixing will achieve a horizontal position
accuracy of 100m of 0.05NM with a 95% probability. Compare this with a Non Directional
Beacon that has a bearing uncertainty of 5 degrees, this equates to a horizontal error of +/0.5NM at a range of 6NM. It should be noted that the position error of GNSS is uniform where
a ground based navigational facility achieves greater accuracy as the aircraft approaches the
beacon.
Considerations.
In order for RNAV GNSS non-precision approaches to be Internationally acceptably to the
aviation industry more investigation and analysis is still required by manufactures, airlines,
national regulators and technical institutions. One of the main problems is that RNAV
equipment contains proprietary algorithms and therefore there is insufficient data available at
present to validate target levels of safety. Furthermore database integrity is a further problem
that has not been sufficiently addressed to the satisfaction of many national regulatory
authorities. In addition RNAV/GNSS NPA does not form part of a pilots instrument rating
training and testing in most (if any) countries. Training and testing is the responsibility of the
operator. This will probably change as GNSS NPA becomes more widely accepted. Most pilots
have heard of it, but very few have done it.
Future Activities.
Cyrrus Associates Limited with Flight Precision Limited has recently developed a RNAV NPA
procedure for a UK Civil Airport. This procedure will be published within the UK AIP and has
been subject to rigorous review by the UK CAA Safety Regulation Group. Having published
the procedure, Cyrrus Associates Limited along with their partner Flight Precision Limited will
conduct regular flight tests and gather flight data to evaluate the published procedure. This will
enable further analysis and investigation to be carried out with the goal to develop additional
IFR procedures using GNSS in the future.
RNAV (GNSS)
for
Non Precision Approach
By Paul Willis Cyrrus Associates
&
Sarandis Poulimenakos University of Patra
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
Overview
What is BRAV
Operational Considerations
C o s t benefits & advantages
C o n s traints
Next Steps
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
3810'10" N
02344'08" E
ATHINAI
VOR / DME 114.4
ATH
* 3754'03.15" N
02325'25.81" E
NEVR
A1J
11
303
RILIN 1J
PIKAD 1J
35
R 271 ATH
R 266 KRO
T
SA
48
0
745
R
EK
5000 FT
6000 FT
KORINTHOS
NDB 392
KOR
* 3755'56.14" N
02255'57.82" E
NOTE 2
6000 FT
SPA
6000 FT
1J
SOREV
KVR
0006
NEMES
3742'05" N
02234'43" E
277
A
NE STO
VE ME V 1
LO S 1 J
P J
35
1J
R
22
1A
TH
13
RILIN 1J
SAT
VOR / DME 109.6
SAT
3755'00.48" N
02354'51.84" E
5 DM
61
1J
O
A
B
LN
AD
FT
00
11
14
A rea Navigatio n
4 0 0 0 FT
PIK
SUN
9000 FT
ASTOV
3725'03" N
02232'06" E
NOTES:
VELOP 1J
1J
SOREV
28
KEA
R 165
20
DDM
R 168
SCALE 1:650'000
NM 0
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
T
6000 F
ASTOV 1J
33
R 261 DDM
DIDIMON
VOR/ DME 117.2
DDM
* 3728'40.08" N
02313'01.77" E
KEA
VOR / DME 115.0
KEA
* 3733'26.13" N
02417'55.99" E
TF
NEM
ES 1
J
R 2 33
92 D
DM
VELOP
KM 0
5
5
10
10
15
20
BADEL
R 013
KRO
R0
27
KRO
PIKAD
3803'47" N
02241'57" E
3810'10" N
02433'20" E
A rea Navigatio n
What is RNAV?
B R N A V i s B a s i c A rea N a v igation.
Makes use of Global Position Satellites
(G P S ) to determine the aircrafts position in
3 d i m e n s i o n s (x,y,z). If way points gave
been predetermined then an aircraft track
can be established enabling the aircraft to
navigate between any 2 fixed points.
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
A rea Navigatio n
Way Point 1
Intermediate Fix
Intermediate Fix
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
Way Point 2
Operational C o n s traints
A irborne GNSS Receiver.
Aircraft R e c e i v e r h a s t o b e c e r t i f i e d t o F A A
T S O C 1 2 9 a C l a s s A 1 ( s ta n d a l o n e ) o r B 1 /B 3
for Flight M a n a g e m e n t S y s t e m ( F M S )
integrated equipment.
R N A V (G N S S ) a p p r o a c h m o d e c a n o n l y b e
selected when using a certified (J e p p e s o n )
database.
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
A rea Navigatio n
Traditional Area Navigation is based on.
V O R /D M E o r NDB ground based radio beacons.
T h e V O R /D M E a n d / or NDB provides the aircraft
with a guidance signal that allows navigation by
means of flying a bearing or radial to fixed point.
This is normally to the overhead of the ground
radio beacon. These beacons are positioned so
that an aircraft can fly declared routes within the
national airspace.
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
P o s itio n A c c u r a c y (R a d i o B e a c o n )
A c c u r a c y R e q u i r e m e n t s (NDB).
0.5nm
NDB Beacon
Range 6 nm
Assuming the NDB has a
bearing error of +/- 5 degrees.
A t 6nm this equals a horizontal
error of 0.5NM.
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
P o s itio n A c c u r a c y R N A V
A c c u r a c y R e q u i r e m e n t s (R N A V ).
Position Error Boundary 95% Probability
100m
A ircraft track
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
001 40'W
400
5440'N
001 30'W
001 20'W
001 10'W
NVE11
5437'58.44" N
00111'49.89" W
10 NM
ATHINAI
IA W PGP/DME
1 111.10
N V N 1 1 I-ATR
CH 480X
5440'50.00"
N
3755'40.08"
N
02356'56.40"
E
00119'09.03"
W
293
5440'N
23
LLZ 111.10
03L
SAT
NVW04
5431'13.19" N
00132'41.68" W
IA W P 2
NVE13
5439'19.09" N
00109'17.97"
W
KRO
16
ATHINAI
VOR/DME 114.4
ATH
* 3754'03.15" N
02343'42.76" E
SPA
VOR/DME 117.5
SPA
3755'04.80" N
32
02356'16.80" E 2
FAWP
NVE04
03R
5433'20.30" N
00120'32.52" W
088
30
KVR
NM
10
034
12
NM
E
118 GN
D408 / 2.5
O C N L / 5.6
FAF
9 DME I - ATR
3748'20.30"
M A X NIAS
02349'54.75" E
MNM ALT
IF 2 5 0 0 F T
19 DME I - ATR
5433'28.05" N
00107'33.99" W
9 10
MNM
A
5000 LT
FT
0 1
* 3733'26.13" N
4
5
02417'55.99" E
R 197
KM
SCALE 1:500'000
NM 0 1 2 3 4 5
KM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
00
00133'43.43" W
KEA
VOR/DME 115.0
SCALE 1:350'000KEA
100
5420'N
001 40'W
benefits.
001 30'W
IF
19 DME I - ATR
5 DME
I - ATR
GP 3
3200 FT
70
SPA
VOR / DME
001 10'W
3 DME
I - ATR
MISSED APPROACH:
Climb straight ahead. At 3
DME (passed the station)
I - ATR turn right. Intercept
R 331 KEA, proceed to
KEA VOR/DME and hold.
Climb to 5000 FT, climb
gradient 3 % until passing
1200 FT. (SEE NOTE)
1917 FT
034
TRANSITION ALTITUDE
9000 FT
30
5420'N
001 20'W
FAF
9 DME I - ATR
4000 FT
ILS RDH
54.1 FT
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
LEEMING CMATZ
127.750
D409 / 3.4
(THR RWY 03 R)
25
20
15
10
13
DIDIMON
VOR/DME 117.20
DDM
* 3728'40.08" N
02313'01.77" E
KEA
DM
62 D
R 0 25 NM
5430'N
MAWP
NVE01
18.67" N
SUN5431'
00124'21.34" W
32
R 185 ATH
15
NM
R2
20
SP
A
In s trument
Approach
2
(less noise).
5
210 KT
0
5430'N
A
1 KE
R 33 6 NM
2
AIGINA
NDB 382
EGN
* 3745'51.06" N
02325'25.81" E
034
IW P
RNAV Non Precision Approach Procedures
are
NVN08
5436'02.69" N
400
designed on a continuous decent
approach
00115'27.46" W
Firstly
lets
look
at
a
traditional
IL SIA W P 3
D A ) rather
than a traditionalbenefits
steppedN Vdescent.
(CThis
has Environmental
E12
0 NM
10
15
C o n s traints
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
Next S teps
Cyrrus Associates
Limited
F light P r e c i s i o n L i m i t e d , b e i n g t h e U K l i c e n s e d f l i g h t
inspector will undertake pilot training and extensive
flight inspection of the promulgated procedure to
gather more data for future analysis & validation.