Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
flexible Pavements
Computation of Strains
z =
1
( z ( r + t ) )
E
1
r = ( r ( t + z ) )
E
t =
1
( t ( r + z ))
E
z = K
P
z2
3
1
K=
2 1 + (r z )2
P
z
52
z
r
z3
z = p 1 2 2
a +z
32
Foster and Ahlvin (1954) developed charts for computing vertical, tangential
and radial stresses. The charts were developed for = 0.5.
This work was subsequently refined by Ahlvin and Ulery (1962) allowing for
evaluation of stresses and strains at any point in the homogenous mass for
any .
Due to axis symmetry, there are only three normal stresses, z, r and t
and one shear stress rz.
One-layer theory can be applied as an approximation for a conventional
flexible pavement with granular base/subbase with a thin asphaltic layer on
a stiff subgrade comparable to the base/subbase. (i.e., E1/E2 1)
The deflection that occurs within the pavement (p) is neglected and
therefore, the pavement surface deflection (T) is equal to the deflection on
the top of subgrade (s)
T
T = s + p
p
E1, 1, h1
p = 0
Therefore, T = s
s
E2, 2, h2=
2.
E1, 1, h1
E2, 2, h2=
Deflection Profile
Ground Reaction
z3
z = p 1 2 2
a +z
32
p
2(1 + 2 )
z3
+
Radial stress at axis symmetry: r = 1 + 2 2
2
( a + z 2 ) 0 .5 ( a 2 + z 2 ) 3 2
Strains can be computed from the following equations:
1
( z ( r + t ) )
E
1
r = ( r ( t + z ) )
E
1
t = ( t ( r + z ) )
E
z =
z = z dz
z =
(1 + ) pa
a
1 2 2
2 0.5
+
(
a
+
z
)
z
2
2 0.5
E
a
(a + z )
For = 0.5,
At z = 0,
3 pa 2
z =
2 E (a 2 + z 2 ) 0.5
2(1 2 ) pa
z =
E
1.5 pa
At z = 0 and = 0.5, z =
E
dz
Steel
Deflection Profile
pa
p(r ) =
2(a 2 r 2 ) 0.5
Ground Reaction
By integrating a point load
over the contact area of the
plate it can be shown that
o =
(1 2 ) pa
2E
If = 0.5, then,
o =
1.18 pa
E
Two-layer Systems
The effect of layers above subgrade is to reduce the
stress and deflections in the subgrade.
Burmister (1958) obtained solutions for two-layer
problem by using strain continuity equations.
Vertical stress depends on the modular ratio (i.e., E1/E2)
Vertical stress decreases considerably with increase in
modular ratio.
For example,
for a/h1=1 and E1/E2 = 1, z at interface = 65% of contact
pressure
for a/h1=1 and E1/E2 = 100, z at interface = 8% of contact
pressure
T =
1.5 pa
F2
E2
T =
1.18 pa
F2
E2