Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract
Grain size and bed thickness are important geological attributes for sedimentary facies analysis and reservoir quality ranking
in deepwater turbidite reservoirs. Grain size controls reservoir quality and has causative or correlational effects on most well
logs. Additionally, bed thickness affects well logs in various ways because of different vertical logging-tool resolutions. The
objective of this paper is to quantitatively classify rock and bed types based on conventional well logs to assist facies
interpretation and stratigraphic reservoir modeling.
We model physical properties and well-log responses originating from clastic reservoirs with different grain-size distributions
in the context of deepwater turbidite systems. The model accounts for fluid effects introduced by capillary transitions and
salty connate water. Petrophysical relationships are examined between grain sizes and pore geometry as inferred from the
combined effects of initial connate-water saturation and reservoir capillary pressure. From modeling, we derive several
quantitative petrophysical attributes which correlate significantly with grain size. A list of such attributes includes
volumetric concentration of shale, total porosity, neutron-density porosity difference, and reservoir quality index (RQI). Rock
classification is then performed based on a relevant set of attributes to detect and rank different rock types with specific
grain-size distributions. Concomitantly, a quantitative rock classification scheme using three-dimensional Thomas-Stieber
diagrams constructed with gamma ray, bulk density, and resistivity logs is used to classify petrophysical zones based on their
average bed thicknesses. A dual-attribute rock classification scheme is proposed to better associate rock types with
depositional facies.
The above-mentioned rock-classification and bed-typing methods are synthesized and applied to a turbidite field from the
Gulf of Mexico. We perform facies analysis based on the vertical succession of rock types (grain sizes) and the inferred
variations of bed thickness. The field case demonstrates that these two geologic attributes have great potential in reducing
uncertainty and non-uniqueness in the construction of stratigraphic reservoir models. Results indicate that the classified rock
types and their petrophysical ranking agree with core data while the interpreted facies fit into the depositional context as
inferred from core descriptions and seismic horizons.
Introduction
Rock classification (or simply rock typing) is an emerging reservoir description tool that elicits broad research interests in the
oil and gas industry. It has become increasingly important in modern reservoir description to invoke close integration of
multi-discipline, multi-physics, and multi-scale subsurface data including pore imaging, core measurements, well logs,
seismic amplitude data, well testing, and production surveillance (Gunter et al., 1997a). Interestingly, the definition of rock
type still remains ambiguous and sometimes arguable in many situations as it depends highly on the specific description
purposes to be achieved by geoscientists and engineers. Geologists consider rock types as depositional facies or lithofacies
which emphasize the genesis of rock formations to enable 3D stratigraphic reservoir modeling (Fisher, 1982; Kerans and
Tinker, 1999; Muto and Steel, 2007; Slatt, 2007). Petrophysicists define rock types based on pore geometry that relates all
static and dynamic petrophysical properties (Archie, 1950 and 1952). Reservoir and production engineers group rock types as
SPE 166178
flow units that are stratigraphically continuous intervals of similar geologic and petrophysical features to upscale reservoir
grids for efficient fluid-flow simulation (Gunter et al., 1997b). Noteworthy is that reservoir characterization teams are
working toward a common objective: to construct a verifiable reservoir model populated with accurate petrophysical
properties for reserves estimation and production forecasting (Lucia, 1999). Therefore, developing new rock classification
schemes and workflows that serve multiple characterization purposes from different disciplines remains a challenging but
important task.
For subsurface studies, whole core samples and well logs are the main sources of high-resolution geological data. Routine
geological work infers grain size and bed thickness from slabbed core samples. However, in most cases whole core spans a
very limited segment of the reservoir. Log-core integration is therefore necessary to extrapolate geological properties from
cored depth intervals to remaining wells and into the reservoir. Rock classification based on core data is relatively simple
because petrophysical properties are rigorously measured under the same protocol. However, rock classification using
downhole well logs is more challenging and is subject to great uncertainty. Four technical issues immediately arise when
moving from core data to well logs for rock typing, namely data quality, indirect measurements, variable reservoir
conditions, and scale discrepancy (Xu, 2013). These compounded technical problems were initially defined by Archie as the
geometrical problem (1950). In the present paper, we aim to address the issue of indirectness. Indirectness lies in using
physical measurements to estimate petrophysical properties and interpret geological attributes. In fact, most well logs are
simultaneously sensitive to grains, texture, structure, and fluids. Table 1.1 summarizes the sensitivity of various well logs to
rock petrophysical properties and geological attributes. It is found that none of the logs are directly sensitive to grain size and
only a few logs have good sensitivity to bedding structure. Grain size information can only be indirectly inferred from the
pore geometry formed in-between grains. Moreover, well logs highly sensitive to pore geometry and bedding structure are
also significantly influenced by fluid content, as in the case of resistivity logs. Therefore, fluid effects on well logs need to be
cautiously accounted for before inferring grain and bed properties.
Table 1 Sensitivity of well logs to petrophysical properties and geological attributes (modified
from Serra and Abbot, 1980).
Composition
Texture
Structure
Fluid
Gamma Ray
High
Low
Low
Low
PE Factor
High
Low
Low
Low
Neutron Porosity
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Bulk Density
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Electrical Resistivity
Low
Medium
High
High
Acoustic Slowness
High
Medium
Medium
High
Magnetic Resonance
Medium
High
Low
High
The ultimate goal of rock classification is to associate petrophysical rock types with geological framework and reconcile
them with seismic facies to propagate rock-type associated petrophysical properties into the reservoir model. This endeavor is
difficult without understanding the cause-and-effect relationship between pore geometry and rock geological attributes such
as grain size and bed thickness. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the sensitivity of well logs to those geological attributes
and the associated pore geometries in the presence of different fluid-saturation conditions resulting from either hydrocarbon
migration or mud-filtrate invasion. In this paper, we show the causative and correlational impacts of grain size on various
types of logs. In addition, the relationships between gamma ray log and other logs are interpreted to reveal the underlying bed
thickness information as emphasized in Thomas-Stieber diagrams. We propose an integrated petrophysical workflow and a
dual-attribute rock classification scheme to better relate rock types to geological facies in deepwater turbidite reservoirs. A
field case from the central Gulf of Mexico is used to test the workflow and classification schemes.
SPE 166178
1 mm
1 mm
Figure 1 Thin sections describing pore network systems formed by different grain sizes. Left Panel: large grain size; Right Panel:
small grain size (Xu et al., 2013).
SPE 166178
Figure 2 Modeling of pore-size (left panel) and NMR T2-distributions (right panel) for two different rock types (Xu et al., 2013).
Figure 3 Modeling of drainage capillary pressure and resistivity-height relation for two different rock types. Pc: capillary pressure
(left panel); HAFWL: height above the free water level (FWL) (right panel); Rt: bulk rock resistivity (Xu et al., 2013).
Figure 4Simulated well logs across different rock types. Track 1: Depth; Track 2: Gamma ray log; Track 3: Neutron porosity
(sandstone porosity units) and bulk density logs; Track 4: Resistivity log; Track 5: Rock types. Logs are simulated with software
1
UTAPWeLS .
SPE 166178
Correction of Free Water in Capillary Transition Zones. The presence of free water in a capillary transition zone disrupts
the correlation between electrical conductivity and hydraulic conductivity. Xu and Torres-Verdn (2012) proposed a
correction method by linking Leveretts RQI with in-situ capillary pressure (Pc) and initial connate-water saturation (Sw)
using the empirical J-function model (Darling, 2005; Torres-Verdn, 2012):
S w = S wirr + aJ b J ( S w ) = (
S w S wirr b1 ,
)
a
(1)
J (Sw )
S S wirr b1 cos ,
cos = ( w
)
Pc
a
Pc
(2)
where Sw is initial water saturation, Swirr is irreducible water saturation (which is set to 0.01 lower than the minimum water
saturation in the entire reservoir column, Darling, 2005); a and b are constants derived from core-measured capillary pressure
curves; cos is the product of interfacial tension and contact angle, which is assumed constant in the same reservoir; Pc is
in-situ reservoir capillary pressure in psi.
Shale Distribution and Bed Typing from Well Logs
Bedding structure together with bed thickness is often a key parameter for geologists to interpret sedimentary facies
(Campbell, 1967). Thinly bedded or laminated formations are persistent only in some special depositional facies (Passey et
al., 2006). High-resolution image logs provide the best estimation of bedding structures but are not commonly available in all
wells. Thomas-Stiebers diagram (Thomas and Stieber, 1975 & 1977) is a widely applied petrophysical interpretation tool
used to diagnose shale distribution in siliciclastic reservoirs as being laminated, dispersed, or structural (Fig.5; Torres-Verdn,
2012). Thomas-Stieber diagram assumes two end members: clean-sand and pure-shale. Several trends are also defined to
reveal different geological processes yielding different shale distributions which are associated with different mixing laws
reflected on logging measurement physics and the underlying petrophysical properties (Xu and Torres-Verdn, 2013). As a
consequence, rocks with different values of shale volumetric concentration and distribution appear in different locations
when projected onto a Thomas-Stieber diagram (Fig. 6). Xu and Torres-Verdn (2013) proposed a graphical clustering
method to classify petrophysical zones of different bed thickness in a 3D Thomas-Stieber diagram (Fig. 7).
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 5 Three nominal forms of shale distributions in siliciclastic reservoirs: (a) laminated shale, (b) dispersed shale, and (c)
structural shale.
SPE 166178
Figure 6 Thomas-Stieber diagram constructed with bulk density and gamma ray logs. Red circle dots: pivoting points; Blue dashed
lines: trend lines; shaded elliptical regions: uncertainty bounds.
Figure 7 Rock classification and bed typing via k-means cluster analysis (Press et al., 2007) on a 3D Thomas-Stieber diagram
constructed with gamma ray, bulk density, and resistivity logs.
SPE 166178
Figure 8 Integrated dual-attribute rock classification workflow based on well logs and core data.
SPE 166178
Figure 9 Geographic location of the Marco Polo field in the Gulf of Mexico (Contreras, 2006).
Figure 10 Salt tectonics background of the Marco Polo minibasin (Jackson et al., 2008).
Figure 11 Seismic cross-section with the three well trajectories considered in this paper.
SPE 166178
Porosity (p.u.)
Permeability (md)
RQI
RRT1
33.6 1.8
1099 291
56.8 7.2
RRT2
33.3 2.1
549 130
40.4 4.9
RRT3
31.5 4.4
179 63.7
23.4 3.4
RRT4
24.1 6.1
42.9 19.1
13.1 2.1
RRT5
19.7 3.9
11.3 3.9
7.5 1.1
RRT6
19.6 3.7
4 1.5
4.4 0.86
(m)
10
SPE 166178
Description
Dominated by sand-size
grains with a narrow
distribution in the largesize mode (i.e., good
sorting).
Facies Interpretation
Turbidite channel infill
including channel lag.
Dominated by silt-size
grains with only a small
proportion of sand-size
grains. Overall
distribution is widely
spread (i.e., relatively
poor sorting).
Dominated by silt-size
grains with an overall
wide distribution (i.e.,
poor sorting).
Overbank deposits
possibly including thin
debris flows.
Silt
Sand
Sand
Silt
Silt
Thick sand
Laminated sand-shale
Core Photos
Description
Structureless coarse-grained
sandstone with no clear
internal lamination.
Facies Interpretation
Amalgamated turbidite
channel deposits.
Interbedded sand-shale
sequence with variable netto-gross ratio.
Fine-grained shale or
siltstone.
SPE 166178
11
Figure 13 Example of a fining-upward unit identified from vertical stacking of petrophysical rock types. Track 1: Depth; Track 2:
Gamma ray log; Track 3: Neutron (in apparent sandstone porosity units) porosity and bulk density logs; Track 4: Induction
resistivity logs; Track 5: Rock types of different grain-size distributions; Track 6: Core permeability.
12
SPE 166178
Figure 14 Rock typing and facies interpretation in the key well of the Gulf-of-Mexico case. Tracks 1-4: basic well logs; Tracks 5-6:
standard well-log analysis, saturation-height for rock types 1 to 3; Tracks 7: distribution of rock types; Track 8: interpreted
sedimentary facies.
8
Figure 15 Rock typing and facies interpretation in the key well of the Gulf-of-Mexico case. Tracks 1-4: basic well logs; Tracks 5-6:
standard well-log analysis, saturation-height for rock types 1 to 3; Tracks 7: distribution of rock types; Track 8: interpreted
sedimentary facies.
SPE 166178
13
Stratigraphic Correlation with Multi-Well Logs. After rock classification, bed typing, and facies interpretations are
performed in individual wells, a multi-well cross-sectional view can be constructed for stratigraphic analysis. Figure 16
shows the corresponding results from the three well penetrations. The locations of these wells in a submarine fan complex
with stacked progradational lobes are consistent with the interpretation made from seismic horizons. Stratigraphic analysis
together with the estimated petrophysical properties can then be integrated with seismic amplitude data for populating a
reservoir model.
2.4
3 33
0 000333333333
3 3
0 033337737737 3 7777777777 7 7 9
3 3 7 777 7
7 7779 99 9
000000007
79 9
0000 00000055557757 7777 7 7777 777
00 55 55 5 55 577 777 7777779999 99999 9 9
99
7 7 99 9
55555
99
99999 9
5 95 99 9
5 22 2
55
6 6 6
6 5 5 5 5 2222222222 222222 2 222 222 2 2 2
6
222
6
6555
2222 2
2222222222
6552
6
22
2 22 222
222
8 22 22
2 2222 2222222 22 2 2
2
2.2
2.4
RHOB (G/CM3)
2.2
3
3
03 33333 3
0
33
0 0 00 0 00
337
00003573
7
777
77
0 0 0 0 000
00
00000
777 77 7 77777 7 7
5555
55
0005
0 00 000
5 7 777 777777
777 7 9
0 0 0 0000 55555 5555 5557
7777 777777777
7 7779 99999
5
7
9 999 9
0
7
7
5 7 7777
55555 5
7557
7777 799 99 9 99 99
6 5 5 5 55 55
9 99 99 9
4
5
55 9
4
5 555 555 5 5 2
1 66 66 666
555
55
5 5555
6 6
5
6
5 22 22 22
56 555
555 5 5555
6 66
55 22222222222222
2222
222222
22 2
6 666 6
222
5 5 2222
2222
222222 222
2222
22
66
222 2 22
222222
8
2
8
RHOB (G/CM3)
RHOB (G/CM3)
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.2
-1
0 00 37
57 75 7 7 7
0 00000005575
0 000000000
05
5 5557757 77777 799999999 999
55555
5555
00
0 55
555
00555
55555
5 5 57 77777 999
9999 99
99
65555 55555
5 5 5 999
95
-1-1
5
5
9
9
5
5
6 6 5555 5 5
5 55
555 5 95 2 2 2 2
6 5555
6
5 5 2 22 2 222 2
6
5 22
22 2 2 2 222 22 2 2
55 55555
2 2222
1
2 2
2222222222222
6565552 2 222
66
222
6
2222222
2
2
2
2
2
88 2 2222 2 2
2.4
2.6
2.6
2.6
30
40
50
60
70
GR (GAPI)
80
90
100
2.8
30
40
50
60
70
GR (GAPI)
80
90
100
2.8
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
GR (GAPI)
Figure 16 Use of rock-type and bed-type distributions in multiple wells to assist sedimentological and stratigraphic interpretation.
The upper panel shows the Thomas-Stieber diagram constructed with bulk density and gamma ray logs in each well below. The
lower panel shows the log tracks in each well with the following information: Track 1: Depth; Track 2: Gamma ray log; Track 3:
Neutron (in apparent sandstone porosity units) porosity and bulk density logs; Track 4: Induction resistivity logs; Track 5: Bed type;
Track 6: Rock type of different grain-size distribution.
Conclusions
Grain size and bed thickness are two geological attributes that can be interpreted from conventional logs in turbidite
reservoirs. The petrophysical quality of young deepwater turbidite reservoirs is controlled chiefly by sedimentary grain sizes.
Therefore, a link exists between petrophysical rock types and depositional facies which can be effectively applied in reservoir
development efforts. Thomas-Stieber diagrams are useful in identifying thinly bedded or laminated zones which provide
additional aid for facies interpretation. We propose an integrated petrophysical workflow that combines grain-size and bedthickness attributes to reduce uncertainty in stratigraphic reservoir modeling. Reservoir capillary transition effects on
resistivity logs need to be corrected for more accurate estimation of grain sizes. In the deepwater Gulf-of-Mexico field case,
we confirmed that multi-well rock typing can assist sedimentary and stratigraphic studies which have potential applications
for exploration in frontier basins or in deepwater environments, where subsalt or pre-salt reservoirs cannot be clearly imaged
with seismic data and well drilling is limited due to high rig costs.
14
SPE 166178
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Anadarko Petroleum Cooperation for providing the field data used for analysis and verification. The
work reported in this paper was funded by The University of Texas at Austins Research Consortium on Formation
Evaluation, jointly sponsored by Afren, Anadarko, Apache, Aramco, Baker-Hughes, BG, BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron, China
Oilfield Services, LTD., ConocoPhillips, ENI, ExxonMobil, Halliburton, Hess, Maersk, Marathon Oil Corporation, Mexican
Institute for Petroleum, Nexen, ONGC, OXY, Petrobras, PTTEP, Repsol, RWE, Schlumberger, Shell, Statoil, Total,
Weatherford, Wintershall and Woodside Petroleum Limited.
Nomenclature
a
:
b
:
J
:
k
:
p
:
:
Pc
R
:
:
Rt
:
Rw
:
Sw
:
Swirr
:
T2
:
SPE 166178
15
References
Archie, G.E. 1950. Introduction to Petrophysics of Reservoir Rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 34 (5): 943 - 961.
Archie, G.E. 1952. Classification of Carbonate Reservoir Rocks and Petrophysical Considerations. AAPG Bulletin, 36(2): 278-298.
Campbell, C. V. 1967. Lamiae, Laminaset, Bed and Bedset. Sedimentology, 8(1967): 7-26.
Contreras A. 2006. Spatial Delineation, Fluid-Lithology Characterization, and Petrophysical Modeling of Deepwater Gulf of Mexico
Reservoirs through Joint AVA Deterministic and Stochastic Inversion of 3D Partially-Stacked Seismic Amplitude Data and Well
Logs. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Contreras A., Torres-Verdn, C., Chesters, W., Kvien, K., and Fasnacht T. 2006. Extrapolation of Flow Units away from Wells with 3D
Pre-Stack Seismic Amplitude Data: Field Example. Petrophysics, 47(3): 223-238.
Darling, T. 2005. Well Logging and Formation Evaluation. Gulf Professional Publishing.
Fisher, W. L. 1982. Depositional Systems and Environments, in Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. New York, McGraw-Hill, 5th
ed., 104-108.
Glaister, R.P., and Nelson, H.W. 1974. Grains-Size Distributions, an Aid in Facies Identification. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,
22(3):203-240.
Gunter, G.W., Pinch, J.J., Finneran, J.M., and Bryant, W.T. 1997a. Overview of an Integrated Process Model to Develop Petrophysical
Based Reservoir Descriptions. Paper SPE 38748 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,
Texas, 5-8 October.
Gunter, G.W., Finneran, J.M., Hartmann, D.J., and Miller, J.D. 1997b. Early Determination of Reservoir Flow Units Using an Integrated
Petrophysical Method. Paper SPE 38679 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5-8
October.
Hill, H.J., Shirley, O.J., and Klein, G.E. 1979. Bound Water in Shaly Sands Its Relation to Qv and Other Formation parameters. The Log
Analyst, May-June, 3 -19.
Jackson, M.P.A., Hudec, M.R., and Dooley, T.P. 2010. Some Emerging Concepts in Salt Tectonics in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico:
Intrusive Plumes, Canopy-Margin Thrusts, Minibasin Triggers and Allochthonous Fragments. Vining, B.A. and Pickering, S.C. (eds)
Petroleum Geology: From Mature Basins to New Frontiers Proceedings of the 7th Petroleum Geology Conference, 899912.
Kerans, C., and Tinker, S. 1999. Sequence Stratigraphy and Characterization of Carbonate Reservoirs. SEPM short course no. 40.
Leverett, M.C. 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. Transactions of the AIME, 142(1): 159172.
Lucia, F.J. 1999. Carbonate reservoir characterization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Muto, T., Steel, R., and Swenson, J. 2007. Autostratigraphy: a Framework norm for Genetic Stratigraphy. Journal of Sedimentary
Research, 77: 2-12.
Neasham, J.W. 1977. The Morphology of Dispersed Clay in Sandstone Reservoirs and Its Effect on Sandstone Shaliness, Pore Space, and
Fluid Flow Properties. Paper SPE-6858 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 9-12
October.
Passey, Q.R., Dahlberg, K.E., Sullivan, K., Yin, H., Brackett, B., Xiao, Y., and Guzman-Garcia, A.G. 2006. Petrophysical Evaluation of
Hydrocarbon Pore-Thickness in Thinly Bedded Clastic Reservoirs. AAPG Publications, Archie Series, No.1.
Pirson J.S. 1983. Geologic Well Log Analysis. Third Edition, Gulf Professional Publishing.
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P. 2007. Section 16.1: Gaussian Mixture Models and k-Means Clustering,
Numerical Recipes. The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reading, H.G. 1996. Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy. 3rd Edition, Blackwell Science.
Rider, M.H. 1990. Gamma-Ray Log Shape Used as a Facies Indicator: Critical Analysis of an Oversimplified Methodology. Geological
Society, London, Special publications, 48: (27-37).
Serra, O., and Abbott, H. T. 1980. The Contribution of Logging Data to Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Paper SPE 9270 presented at 55th
SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 21-24 September.
Serra, O., and Serra, L. 2003. Well Logging and Geology. Technip.
Slatt, R.M. 2007. Stratigraphic Reservoir Characterization for Petroleum Geologists, Geophysicists, and Engineers. Elsevier Publication.
Thomas, E. C., and Stieber, S. J. 1975. The Distribution of Shale in Sandstones and Its Effect Upon Porosity. Paper T presented at the 16th
Annual Logging Symposium of the SPWLA, New Orleans, Louisiana, 4-7 June.
Thomas, E. C., and Stieber, S. J. 1977. Log Derived Shale Distributions in Sandstone and Its Effect upon Porosity, Water Saturation, and
Permeability. 6th Formation Evaluation Symposium of the Canadian Well Logging Society, Calgary, Alberta, 24-26 October.
Torres-Verdn, C. 2012. Integrated Geological-Petrophysical Interpretation of Well Logs. Lecture Notes for Fundamental Well Logging
Course in the University of Texas at Austin, Unpublished.
Xu, C. 2013. Reservoir Description by Well-Log-Based and Core-Calibrated Petrophysical Rock Classification. Ph. D. Dissertation, The
University of Texas at Austin.
Xu, C., and Torres-Verdn, C. 2012. Saturation-Height and Invasion Consistent Hydraulic Rock Typing Using Multi-Well Conventional
Logs. Paper KK presented at SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium, Cartagena, Colombia, 16-20 June.
Xu, C., Torres-Verdn, C., and Gao, S. 2013. Electrical versus Hydraulic Rock Types in Clastic Reservoirs: Pore-Scale Modeling Verified
with Field Observations in the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. 83rd SEG Annual Meeting, Houston, 22 27 September.
Xu, C., and Torres-Verdn, C. 2013. Quantitative Rock Type Codification and Interpretation Using Log-Attributes Derived from ThomasStieber Diagrams in Siliciclastic Reservoirs. SEG Interpretation Journal (submitted for review).