Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Edited by Steven Henikoff, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, and approved May 14, 2014 (received for review February 26, 2014)
histone methylation
| homologous recombination
Author contributions: O.G.-Y. and B.D.P. designed research; B.D.P. conceived and planned
the study, with input from M.K.A. and O.G.-Y.; M.K.A., O.G.-Y., C.X., and Y.X. performed
research; M.K.A. performed laser microirradiation, plasmid construction, and cell-based
analysis; O.G.-Y. performed the ChIP experiments with contributions from C.X.; Y.X. contributed to assay development; M.K.A., O.G.-Y., and B.D.P. analyzed data; and M.K.A.,
O.G.-Y., and B.D.P. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
1
CELL BIOLOGY
efficient DSB repair in euchromatin. Understanding the dynamics of H3K9 methylation at DSBs is therefore critical to understanding how Tip60 activity is regulated by the local chromatin
architecture. Here, we show that the suv39h1 methyltransferase is
recruited to DSBs in euchromatin as part of a larger kap-1/HP1/
suv39h1 complex. Suv39h1 increases H3K9me3 at DSBs, activating Tip60s acetyltransferase activity and promoting the subsequent acetylation and activation of ATM. Further, loss of
inducible H3K9me3 at DSBs leads to defective repair and increased
radiosensitivity. Finally, loading of the kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 complex is transient, and the complex is rapidly released from the
chromatin through a negative feedback loop driven by ATMdependent phosphorylation of the kap-1 protein.
Results
Initially, we determined whether H3K9me3 participates in DSB
repair in chromatin domains that lack endogenous H3K9me2/3.
The p84zinc finger nuclease (p84-ZFN) creates a DSB in intron 1
of the PPP1R12C gene (12, 13). PPP1R12C lacks significant
H3K9me2/3 but is rich in marks associated with transcription
(ENCODE database, http://encodeproject.org/ENCODE/). Chromatin IP (ChIP) demonstrated increased phosphorylation of
H2AX (H2AX) at the p84-ZFN DSB (Fig. 1A). ChIP with
H3K9me3 antibody (Fig. S1A) demonstrated increased H3K9me3
on either side of the DSB (1.5 kb), with lower levels of H3K9me3
extending >200 kb away from the DSB (Fig. 1A). A small increase in H3K9me2 was also detected (Fig. 1B). Histone H3
levels were unchanged (Fig. 1B), indicating increased methylation
rather than changes in H3 content. Further, no change in either
H3K36me3 or H4K20me2 was seen at the DSB (Fig. S1B). Finally, H3K9me3 was not increased at a distal chromosome site
(Fig. S1C), indicating that the increased H3K9me3 is restricted to the chromatin domain adjacent to the DSB.
The H3K9 methyltransferase suv39h1 has been implicated in
DSB repair (4, 18, 19). Depletion of suv39h1 with siRNA (Fig.
S1D) significantly reduced H3K9me3 at the p84-ZFN DSB (Fig.
1C). Furthermore, ChIP demonstrated that suv39h1 was loaded
onto the chromatin at the DSB (Fig. 1D and Fig. S1E). Finally,
suv39h1 was rapidly (within 5 min) recruited to regions of DNA
damage created with laser microirradiation (Fig. 1E). The
suv39h1 methyltransferase is therefore recruited to DSBs and
increases local H3K9me3 in response to DSBs.
Interaction between Tip60 and H3K9me3 (4) promotes acetylation of ATM (5, 6, 17) and histone H4 (1214) by Tip60.
Depletion of suv39h1 reduced inducible H3K9me3 (Fig. 1C) and
inhibited acetylation of histone H4 by Tip60 (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, depletion of suv39h1 attenuated ATM activation
(Fig. S2A) and reduced phosphorylation of kap-1 (Fig. S2B).
This finding is consistent with methylation of H3K9 by suv39h1
playing an essential role in activation of Tip60s acetyltransferase
activity and the subsequent acetylation and activation of the
ATM kinase. Furthermore, cells lacking suv39h1 have increased
radiation sensitivity (Fig. 2B) and reduced homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair (Fig. 2C). Finally, recruitment of
brca1 and RPA32 to DSBs (Fig. 2D) were reduced following loss
of suv39h1, consistent with the decrease in HR-mediated repair
in suv39h1-deficient cells (Fig. 2C). However, nonhomologous
end-joining (NHEJ) activity was not significantly altered by loss
of suv39h1 (Fig. S2C), implying that regulation of the Ku70/80
complex and DNAPKcs activity does not require H3K9 methylation. These results are consistent with previous studies demonstrating
increased genomic instability in mice and other experimental systems
(4, 18, 19) in which suv39h1 was inactivated. Methylation of
H3K9 by suv39h1 at DSBs therefore plays a critical role in activating Tip60, controlling ATM signaling, and in directing DSB
repair and maintaining genomic stability.
Two heterochromatin-binding proteins, kap-1 and HP1, are
corecruited to sites of DNA damage (22, 23), although how they
impact DSB repair is not clear. However, suv39h1 can interact with
kap-1/HP1 repressor complexes (20, 21, 24), suggesting that kap-1
and HP1 may recruit suv39h1 to DSBs. Initially, we confirmed that
9170 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1403565111
Fig. 1. Suv39h1 promotes H3K9 methylation at DSBs. (A) 293T cells transfected with p84-ZFN were processed for ChIP by using H2AX or
H3K9me3 antibodies, followed by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) with
primer pairs located at the indicated positions. Results are fold enrichment
relative to uncut DNA, which is assigned a value of 1 (solid black line; Uncut).
Results are SD (n = 3). (B) 293T cells transfected with p84-ZFN (ZFN) or
vector (Vec) were processed for ChIP by using antibodies to H3, H2AX,
H3K9me3, or H3K9me2 and primer pairs located 1.5 kb to the right of the
DSB. Results are expressed as fold enrichment relative to uncut DNA. Results
are SD (n = 3). (C) 293T cells were transfected with nonspecific () or siRNA
targeting suv39h1 (+). Forty-eight hours later, cells were transfected with
vector (Vec) or p84-ZFN (ZFN) and processed for ChIP by using antibody
against H3K9me3 and primers located 1.5 kb to either side of the DSB.
Results are SD (n = 3). (D) 293T cells were transfected with vector (Vec) or
p84-ZFN (ZFN) and processed for ChIP with suv39h1 antibody and primers
located 1.5 kb to either side of the DSB. Results are SD (n = 3). (E ) U2OS
cells were transfected with nonspecific (control) or suv39h1-specific
(siSuv39h1) siRNA. Forty-eight hours later, focused regions of DNA damage
were produced by using a scanning laser system. Cells were fixed for immunofluorescent staining by using antibodies to H2AX (green) or suv39h1
(red). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).
kap-1 interacts with the HP1, HP1, and suv39h1 and that this
interaction was not altered by DNA damage (Fig. S3 B and C).
When laser striping was used to create focused regions of DNA
damage, suv39h1 (Fig. 3A) and kap-1 (Fig. 3B) were recruited to
sites of DNA damage with similar kinetics, such that 90% of
H2AX stripes were colocalized with suv39h1 and kap-1 (Fig.
3C). Furthermore, ChIP demonstrated that HP1 was also
recruited to sites of DNA damage (Fig. 3D). Importantly,
Ayrapetov et al.
CELL BIOLOGY
Fig. 3. Recruitment of suv39h1 to DSBs requires kap-1 and HP1. (A) U2OS cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNA to kap-1. DNA damage was
created by using a laser, and cells were allowed to recover for 0, 15, or 30 min. Cells were costained with antibody to suv39h1 (red) or H2AX (green). (B) U2OS
cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNA to suv39h1. DNA damage was created by using a laser, and cells were allowed to recover for 0, 15, or 30
min. Cells were costained with antibody to kap1 (green) or H2AX (red). (C) Quantitation of results in A and B. The percentage of H2AX laser stripes that
colocalized with either suv39h1 or kap-1 stripes were noted. Results are SD (n = 2560 cells). (D) 293T cells expressing nonspecific shRNA (control) or shRNA
to kap-1 or suv39h1 were transfected with vector (Vec) or p84-ZFN (ZFN), followed by ChIP using HP1 antibody and primers 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB.
Results are SD (n = 3). (E) 293T cells expressing nonspecific shRNA (control) or shRNA against kap-1 (shKap1) were transfected with p84-ZFN (ZFN) or vector
(Vec) followed by ChIP using H3K9me3 antibody and primers located 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB. Results are SD (n = 3).
Fig. 4. HP1s chromodomain is required to recruit kap-1, HP1, and suv39h1 to DSBs. (A) U2OS cells expressing myc-suv39h1 (SuvWT) or catalytically inactive
myc-suv39h1 (SuvMD) were exposed to laser damage and stained with antibody to myc and H2AX or kap-1 and H2AX. Some cells were preincubated in
dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) (1 mM/1 h). (B) U2OS cells expressing nonspecific shRNA (shVec) or shRNA to suv39h1 (shSuv) were exposed to laser damage
and costained with antibodies to HP1 and H2AX or kap-1 and H2AX. Some cells were preincubated in DMOG (1 mM/1 h). (C) U2OS cells expressing vector,
HP1 (HA-HP1), or HP1 with the chromodomain deleted (HA-HP1CD) were exposed to laser damage and costained with antibodies for HA and H2AX or
suv39h1 and H2AX. Some cells were preincubated in DMOG (1 mM/1 h).
9172 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1403565111
Ayrapetov et al.
CELL BIOLOGY
transiently accumulate at DSBs, supporting this idea. The formation of repressive structures at DSBs in open chromatin has
parallels with DSB repair in heterochromatin. DSB repair in
heterochromatin requires the ATM-dependent phosphorylation
of kap-1 (30, 31), which releases the repressive CHD3 chromatin
remodeler (47) and promotes chromatin relaxation and facilitates DSB repair (31, 32, 47). Thus, immediately after DNA
damage, both euchromatin and heterochromatin domains have
similar structural organization, including high density of H3K9me3
and the presence of repressive complexes, such as kap-1, HP1,
methyltransferases, HDACs, and CHD3/CHD4 remodeling
ATPases (31, 32, 4347). This rapid, but temporary, formation of
repressive chromatin may inhibit local transcription, compact the
local chromatin structure, and rewrite the local epigenetic
landscape, stabilizing open chromatin structures and limiting
DSB mobility during the initial moments following DSB production. However, because repressive chromatin inhibits DSB
repair (30, 31, 47), it is important that these repressive structures
are rapidly dismantled. As the damage response unfolds, H3K9
methylation increases, leading to Tip60 activation and increased
ATM kinase activity. ATM then phosphorylates kap-1, releasing
the repressive kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 from the chromatin and thereby
providing a negative feedback loop that regulates both H3K9
methylation and loading of the kap-1/HP1/suv39h1 complex at
DSBs. In heterochromatin, kap-1 phosphorylation releases the
CHD3 complex (47), leading to relaxation of the chromatin structure (31), although kap-1 remains associated with the heterochromatin. The retention of phosphorylated kap-1 in heterochromatin
may result from the presence of Kruppel-associated box zinc finger proteins (21), which anchor kap-1 to heterochromatin, but
which are absent from open, euchromatin regions. In this way, the
compact structure of heterochromatin and the transient establishment of repressive chromatin at DSBs in open regions can be
reversed through a common mechanism dependent on the ATM
kinase. This structure then allows further chromatin processing to
Fig. 6. Chromatin PARylation recruits kap-1, HP1, and suv39h1 to DSBs. (A)
U2OS cells were preincubated with PARPi (olaparib; 1 h/20 M), followed by
laser microirradiation. Cells were either fixed (0 min) or allowed to recover
for 15 min, and then costained with antibody to suv39h1 and H2AX. (B)
U2OS cells were preincubated in PARPi (olaparib; 20 M) for 1 h, and then
exposed to bleomycin (5 M) for the indicated times. Kap1, pkap1, and tubulin were monitored by Western blot analysis. (C) 293T cells were transfected with vector (Vec) or p84-ZFN (ZFN), followed by solvent (control) or
PARPi (olaparib; 20M). ChIP was carried out by using H3K9me3 antibody
and primers located 1.5 kb to the right of the DSB. Results are SD (n = 3).
(D) 293T cells expressing nonspecific shRNA () or shRNA targeting suv39h1
() were incubated with PARPi for 24 h, and clonogenic cell survival assays
were carried out. Results are SE (n = 3).
ChIP. For ChIP assays (12, 13), cross-linked chromatin was sonicated, and
equivalent amounts were incubated with primary antibody and protein G
1. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ (2010) The DNA damage response: Making it safe to play with
knives. Mol Cell 40(2):179204.
2. Shiloh Y, Ziv Y (2013) The ATM protein kinase: Regulating the cellular response to
genotoxic stress, and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(4):197210.
3. Sun Y, Jiang X, Price BD (2010) Tip60: Connecting chromatin to DNA damage signaling. Cell Cycle 9(5):930936.
4. Sun Y, et al. (2009) Histone H3 methylation links DNA damage detection to activation
of the tumour suppressor Tip60. Nat Cell Biol 11(11):13761382.
5. Sun Y, Xu Y, Roy K, Price BD (2007) DNA damage-induced acetylation of lysine 3016 of
ATM activates ATM kinase activity. Mol Cell Biol 27(24):85028509.
6. Sun Y, Jiang X, Chen S, Fernandes N, Price BD (2005) A role for the Tip60 histone
acetyltransferase in the acetylation and activation of ATM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
102(37):1318213187.
7. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM (1999) Megabase chromatin domains
involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 146(5):905916.
8. Iacovoni JS, et al. (2010) High-resolution profiling of gammaH2AX around DNA
double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. EMBO J 29(8):14461457.
9. Jackson SP, Durocher D (2013) Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and
SUMO. Mol Cell 49(5):795807.
10. Fradet-Turcotte A, et al. (2013) 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A
Lys 15 ubiquitin mark. Nature 499(7456):5054.
11. Price BD, DAndrea AD (2013) Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks.
Cell 152(6):13441354.
12. Xu Y, et al. (2012) Histone H2A.Z controls a critical chromatin remodeling step required for DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell 48(5):723733.
13. Xu Y, et al. (2010) The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin
ubiquitination during DNA repair. J Cell Biol 191(1):3143.
14. Murr R, et al. (2006) Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair
proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 8(1):9199.
15. Soria G, Polo SE, Almouzni G (2012) Prime, repair, restore: The active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 46(6):722734.
16. Tang J, et al. (2013) Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to
promote homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(3):317325.
17. Kaidi A, Jackson SP (2013) KAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation couples chromatin sensing
to ATM signalling. Nature 498(7452):7074.
18. Peters AH, et al. (2001) Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs
mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107(3):323337.
19. Peng JC, Karpen GH (2009) Heterochromatic genome stability requires regulators of
histone H3 K9 methylation. PLoS Genet 5(3):e1000435.
20. Grewal SI, Jia S (2007) Heterochromatin revisited. Nat Rev Genet 8(1):3546.
21. Iyengar S, Farnham PJ (2011) KAP1 protein: An enigmatic master regulator of the
genome. J Biol Chem 286(30):2626726276.
22. Baldeyron C, Soria G, Roche D, Cook AJ, Almouzni G (2011) HP1alpha recruitment to
DNA damage by p150CAF-1 promotes homologous recombination repair. J Cell Biol
193(1):8195.
23. Luijsterburg MS, et al. (2009) Heterochromatin protein 1 is recruited to various types
of DNA damage. J Cell Biol 185(4):577586.
24. Fritsch L, et al. (2010) A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1,
G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. Mol Cell 37(1):4656.
25. Lechner MS, Begg GE, Speicher DW, Rauscher FJ, 3rd (2000) Molecular determinants
for targeting heterochromatin protein 1-mediated gene silencing: Direct chromoshadow
domain-KAP-1 corepressor interaction is essential. Mol Cell Biol 20(17):64496465.
26. Nielsen AL, et al. (1999) Interaction with members of the heterochromatin protein 1
(HP1) family and histone deacetylation are differentially involved in transcriptional
silencing by members of the TIF1 family. EMBO J 18(22):63856395.
27. Li X, et al. (2010) SUMOylation of the transcriptional co-repressor KAP1 is regulated
by the serine and threonine phosphatase PP1. Sci Signal 3(119):ra32.
28. Ivanov AV, et al. (2007) PHD domain-mediated E3 ligase activity directs intramolecular
sumoylation of an adjacent bromodomain required for gene silencing. Mol Cell 28(5):
823837.
29. Ayrapetov MK, et al. (2011) Activation of Hif1 by the prolylhydroxylase inhibitor
dimethyoxalyglycine decreases radiosensitivity. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26064.
30. Noon AT, et al. (2010) 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is
essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 12(2):
177184.
31. Goodarzi AA, et al. (2008) ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand
breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell 31(2):167177.
32. Ziv Y, et al. (2006) Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is
modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat Cell Biol 8(8):
870876.
33. Gibson BA, Kraus WL (2012) New insights into the molecular and cellular functions of
poly(ADP-ribose) and PARPs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(7):411424.
34. Williamson CT, et al. (2010) ATM deficiency sensitizes mantle cell lymphoma cells to
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 9(2):347357.
35. Haince JF, et al. (2007) Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling network is
modulated by a novel poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent pathway in the early response to
DNA-damaging agents. J Biol Chem 282(22):1644116453.
36. Ayoub N, Jeyasekharan AD, Bernal JA, Venkitaraman AR (2008) HP1-beta mobilization promotes chromatin changes that initiate the DNA damage response. Nature
453(7195):682686.
37. Tamaru H (2010) Confining euchromatin/heterochromatin territory: Jumonji crosses
the line. Genes Dev 24(14):14651478.
38. Hathaway NA, et al. (2012) Dynamics and memory of heterochromatin in living cells.
Cell 149(7):14471460.
39. Cheutin T, et al. (2003) Maintenance of stable heterochromatin domains by dynamic
HP1 binding. Science 299(5607):721725.
40. Ahel D, et al. (2009) Poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the
chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1. Science 325(5945):12401243.
41. Xu C, Xu Y, Gursoy-Yuzugullu O, Price BD (2012) The histone variant macroH2A1.1
is recruited to DSBs through a mechanism involving PARP1. FEBS Lett 586(21):
39203925.
42. Timinszky G, et al. (2009) A macrodomain-containing histone rearranges chromatin
upon sensing PARP1 activation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16(9):923929.
43. Polo SE, Kaidi A, Baskcomb L, Galanty Y, Jackson SP (2010) Regulation of DNAdamage responses and cell-cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor
CHD4. EMBO J 29(18):31303139.
44. Chou DM, et al. (2010) A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of
DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(43):1847518480.
45. Smeenk G, et al. (2010) The NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex regulates signaling
and repair of DNA damage. J Cell Biol 190(5):741749.
46. Miller KM, et al. (2010) Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response
to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(9):11441151.
47. Goodarzi AA, Kurka T, Jeggo PA (2011) KAP-1 phosphorylation regulates CHD3 nucleosome remodeling during the DNA double-strand break response. Nat Struct
Mol Biol 18(7):831839.
9174 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1403565111
Ayrapetov et al.