Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/251558592
CITATIONS
DOWNLOADS
VIEWS
10
640
550
3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Muge K. Akin
Tamer Topal
9 PUBLICATIONS 36 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Engineering Geology
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / e n g g e o
Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance (SPT-N)
for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa-Turkey)
Muge K. Akin a,, Steven L. Kramer b, Tamer Topal c
a
b
c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 August 2010
Received in revised form 17 January 2011
Accepted 24 January 2011
Available online 2 February 2011
Keywords:
SPT-based uphole
Shear wave velocity
SPT-N
Erbaa
Turkey
a b s t r a c t
The seismicity of the northern part of Turkey is mainly controlled by the North Anatolian Fault zone (NAFZ).
The NAFZ is one of the world's most active seismic zones, and has produced destructive earthquakes and
related hazards in the northern region of Turkey. Several earthquakes and earthquake-related hazards have
occurred along different segments of this fault zone in the recent past. The study area, Erbaa town, is located
along the eastern segment of North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) and is one of the largest towns of Tokat
Province in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. The center of Erbaa is located on the left embankment of
the Kelkit River. After the disastrous 1942 (Ms = 7.2) and 1943 (Ms = 7.6) earthquakes, the settlement was
shifted southwards.
As a part of a seismic microzonation study of the Erbaa area, shear wave velocity (Vs) values of the geological
units exposed in this area were required for site response analyses. The geological units in the study area
consist mainly of alluvial and Pliocene units. These layers were evaluated on the basis of drilling, in-situ (SPT,
SCPTU and SPT-based uphole) and laboratory testing. In this study, empirical correlations between shear
wave velocity (Vs) and standard penetration test blow counts (SPT-N) were considered in order to dene
shear wave velocity proles for the study area. The relationships between shear wave velocity, Standard
Penetration Test (SPT) blow-counts and the soil properties were evaluated as functions of depth. SPT-based
uphole tests were performed to measure shear wave velocity during drilling operations in some of the
borings. The SPT-based Vs values were computed with different empirical formulas and compared with the
measured SPTbased uphole Vs measurements. The empirical correlations were found to require modication
to provide the best correlation for this site. The depth factor was considered during the development of new
empirical equations. Therefore, a site-specic formula was proposed in order to obtain Vs proles for all layers
in the study area.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Turkey is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world.
The seismicity of the northern part of Turkey is mainly controlled by
the active North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). The NAFZ is one of the
main active seismic zones, and has caused numerous destructive
earthquakes and related hazards in the northern region of Turkey. The
settlement of Erbaa (population approximately 100,000), located
along the eastern segment of the NAFZ, is one of the largest towns of
Tokat Province in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. It is located
in a critical area in terms of the construction and development
aspects. The city center of Erbaa is located on the left embankment of
the Kelkit River. After the disastrous 1942 (Ms = 7.2) and 1943
(Ms = 7.6) earthquakes, most subsequent development in the Erbaa
region was shifted to the hilly region south of the Kelkit River.
Substantial development remained on the alluvial deposits near the
river, however, and rapid increase in population has led to pressure to
expand the developed areas back toward the Kelkit River. The
locations of the new and old settlements are depicted in Fig. 1.
As a part of a microzonation study for the Erbaa area, shear wave
velocity (Vs) values of the geological units exposed in this area are
required for site response analyses. The shear wave velocity is a
fundamental parameter required to dene the dynamic properties of
soils. It is useful in the evaluation of foundation stiffness, earthquake
site response, liquefaction potential, soil density, site classication,
soil stratigraphy and foundation settlements (Richart et al., 1970;
Seed and Idriss, 1970; Schnabel et al., 1972; Sykora and Stokoe, 1983;
Burland, 1989; Sasitharan et al., 1994; Shibuya et al., 1995; Kramer,
1996; Andrus and Stokoe, 1997; Wills and Silva, 1998; Mayne et al.,
1999; Dobry et al., 2000; Lehane and Fahey, 2002; Seed et al., 2003;
Stewart et al., 2003; McGillivray and Mayne, 2004; Holzer et al., 2005;
McGillivray, 2007).
modulus can be computed from shear wave velocity and mass density
() using the following expression:
2
Gmax = Vs
Fig. 2. Simplied geological and tectonic map of Erbaa and its vicinity.
Modied from Barka et al., 2000.
Fig. 4. The general distribution of the previous and recent boreholes in the study area.
and laboratory test results (Ankara University Project, Canik and Kayabali,
2000; Industrial area, Akademi Ltd. Sti., 2002; and Water treatment plant,
Metropol Muh., 2005), were evaluated in this study. The depths of these
boreholes ranged from 10 to 20 m. SPT blow counts were taken at 1.5 m
depth intervals in the boreholes. A total of 48 new boreholes with
intended 30 m depths were drilled to obtain and correlate SPT-based
shear wave velocity values. An intensive sampling and testing program
was applied during the drilling. SPT tests carried out through new 48
boreholes were performed at every 1 m and undisturbed samples (UD)
were taken at every 1 m (where possible) to obtain a continuous soil
prole as much as possible. However, some boreholes could not reach the
desired depth due to the presence of gravelly layers which caused
borehole collapse. The distribution of these boreholes is shown in Fig. 4.
A total of 1390 m of drilling, including 1341 SPT and 312 UD
samples, was performed in this study. The depth of the ground water
level (GWL) at the study area varied between 1 and 19 m, with a few
dry boreholes encountered in the Pliocene units. The GWL in the area
of the Pliocene units, which were generally at higher ground surface
elevations, was deeper (1319 m) than those in the alluvium. The
alluvium unit had a very shallow GWL (12 m) with about one-half
meter uctuation in the dry season near the Kelkit River (Fig. 5). SPT
blow count values from the boreholes were evaluated separately for
the different geological units. The alluvial units had generally low SPT
blow count values (N b 20) indicating a loose-medium dense
sedimentation. Refusal SPT blow counts were mostly obtained in
gravelly layers of the alluvium. In addition, the Pliocene units mostly
reveal refusal during SPT tests after 1015 m in depth.
Several geophysical tests were performed at the site to compare the
characteristics of the soil layers with other eld and laboratory data.
Some 24 electrical resistivity, 23 seismic refraction, 30 seismic cone
penetrometer with pore water pressure (SCPTU) applications, 10 SPTbased uphole surveys, and three downhole surveys were carried out.
Resistivity surveys were performed at 24 points along three proles
in Erbaa to differentiate geological units and the bedrock depth (Fig. 6).
Electrical soundings using the Schlumberger method (Schlumberger,
1920) were applied during resistivity measurements and a total of
150 m depth was investigated. A low frequency original resistivity
instrument working with an alternating current was employed during
the resistivity surveys. Seismic refraction measurements were performed at 23 locations to obtain the subsurface geologic conditions in
Erbaa. A digital seismograph with 24-byte A/D resolution and 12
channels was utilized in the seismic refraction surveys. Seismic
refraction surveys were carried out to a depth of 30 m along three
sections to obtain shear wave velocity prole (Fig. 6). Eventually, three
different layers were dened with respect to seismic measurements.
The SPT-based uphole method, which uses the impact energy of the
split spoon sampler during the SPT test as a vibration source, was rstly
introduced by Ohta et al. (1978). Later, Bang and Kim (2007) used the
same method by interpreting the test results. They introduced the SPTbased uphole test as a combination of low and high-strain tests. The SPTbased uphole test is a modied version of the seismic uphole method. It
uses a number of receivers (geophones) inserted on the ground surface
to obtain the shear wave velocity prole of a site. A schematic diagram of
the SPT-based uphole method is shown in Fig. 7.
The testing procedure can be briey described as follows: surface
geophones are placed on the ground surface at selected distances
from the boring. A minimum of two receivers are required and at least
ve receivers are recommended since using more receivers can
provide better results. The interpretation process assumes the site to
be horizontally layered. Data from the receivers close to the drill rig
The SPT-based uphole method was used for the rst time in Turkey
as a part of this study. The method was applied in the newly drilled 10
boreholes (BH 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 23, 28, 30, and 33) to obtain shear
wave velocity of both Pliocene and alluvial deposits. A total of seven
geophones with 2 m spacing were placed on the nearly horizontal
ground surface, and the measurements were recorded during
hammering in SPT applications. As recommended, two-component
(radial and vertical) geophones were used in order to obtain better
travel time information. Two recordings were conducted during SPT
application for every meter (Akin et al., 2010).
In this method, the shear waves are produced by SPT hammer
impact without any additional explosives or mechanical sources. One
of the typical examples of SPT-based uphole records is depicted in
Fig. 8 for BH-10.
A total of 30 SCPTU measurements with varying depths were
performed in accordance with ASTM D5778-95 (2000) standards
(Fig. 9). The depths reached by the cone penetration test (CPT) apparatus
at some locations were adversely affected by gravelly layers. The depths
of the SCPTU applications ranged from 1 m to 11.4 m.
4. Subsurface conditions for Alluvial and Pliocene soils in Erbaa
The Pliocene deposits are mainly observed towards the hills in the
southern part of the Erbaa study area. As previously described, the
Pliocene deposits consist mainly of uncemented gravel, sand and
occasionally uncompacted sandstone layers. The groundwater level is
assumed to be deeper, since some of 30 m deep boreholes towards the
hills opened during this study in this geological unit were all dry.
Most of the study area is covered with alluvium. The thickness of
the alluvium in the northern part (near the Kelkit River) is generally
greater than that found in the southern part. The alluvium contains
stratied materials of heterogeneous grain sizes, derived from various
geological units in the vicinity. The alluvium in the Erbaa area consists
of gravelly, sandy, silty, clayey layers. The alluvium has a generally
shallow groundwater level, especially in the northern part of Erbaa
towards the Kelkit River. Besides, the alluvial fans were observed in
the small river beds do not spread over a wide area in the Erbaa basin
(Fig. 3).
Laboratory tests indicated that the gravelly and sandy layers had
lower water contents than the silty and clayey layers in alluvium unit.
Moreover, the average water content of the clay layers in the Pliocene
units was lower than those in the alluvial areas. The water contents of
samples varied between 1.1% and 63.9% for the alluvium, and between
4% and 31.6% for the Pliocene unit. The soil classication is based on
the Unied Soil Classication System (USCS), sandy (SM and SP-SW)
and clayey sand (SC) layers were observed in the alluvium. The clayey
gravel (GC) unit showed plasticity similar to the clayey sand (SC).
Based on Atterberg limits, the alluvial clay would be classied as low
plasticity clay (CL). The Pliocene gravel unit contains clay particles.
The clayey gravel unit (GC) is low-plastic. Furthermore, the sandy
layers are represented by clayey sand (SC) and the clayey deposits
(CL-CH) in the Pliocene unit were also generally observed.
The geological and geotechnical properties of the study area were
investigated in sections and an overall evaluation of the eld studies
was performed. Five cross-sections along the study area (Fig. 10) were
investigated; one of the cross-sections (IVIV) mentioned in Fig. 10 is
illustrated in Fig. 11 including SPT blow counts (N30, is the number of
blows for 30 cm depth in SPT) for each borehole. This cross-section
reveals the heterogeneity of the soil layers from SE to NW of the study
area. Pliocene layers are exposed at topographically higher levels and
the lithology of the soil layers changes as the ground surface slopes
downward towards the Kelkit River.
Typical gravel lenses which may produce refusal blow counts were
rarely seen in the typical cross-section. The boundary of the soil units,
especially in the Pliocene units, is also illustrated in the same gure. As
shown in Fig. 11, the ground water level became shallower toward the
Kelkit River.
Fig. 8. One of the typical examples of SPT-based uphole records for BH-10.
The shear wave velocity of the Erbaa soils can be determined from
SPT-based uphole method using seven geophones at ten different
boreholes (BH-4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 23, 28, 30, and 33). The distributions
of shear wave velocity with depth given by the seven different
geophones at BH-4 are illustrated in Fig. 16.
At the beginning of the shear wave velocity measurements from
the SPT-based uphole tests, travel time measurements from all seven
10
Vs (m/s)
0
200
400
600
Ohba&Toriumi (1970)
800
1000
1200
Imai&Yoshimura (1970)
0
Fujiwara (1972)
Ohsaki&Iwasaki (1973)
Imai et al. (1975)
5
Imai (1977)
Ohta&Goto (1978)
Seed&Idriss (1981)
10
Imai&Tonouchi (1982)
Depth (m)
15
20
Sisman (1995)
Iyisan (1996)
Jafari et al. (1997)
25
BH-2
30
Dikmen (2009)
Fig. 12. SPT-N and Vs correlations for all soils in BH-2 with respect to different researchers.
Table 1
Summary of empirical correlations based on SPT-N vs. Vs.
Researcher(s)
Kanai (1966)
Imai and Yoshimura (1970)
Ohba and Toriumi (1970)
Fujiwara (1972)
Shibata (1970)
Ohta et al. (1972)
Ohsaki and Iwasaki (1973)
Imai et al. (1975)
Imai (1977)
Ohta and Goto (1978)
Seed and Idriss (1981)
Imai and Tonouchi (1982)
Seed et al. (1983)
Sykora and Stokoe (1983)
Tonouchi et al. (1983)
Fumal and Tinsley (1985)
Jinan (1987)
Okamoto et al. (1989)
Lee (1990)
Yokota et al. (1991)a
Kalteziotis et al. (1992)
Pitilakis et al. (1992)
Athanasopoulos (1995)
Raptakis et al. (1995)
Sisman (1995)
Iyisan (1996)
Kayabal (1996)
Jafari et al. (1997)
Pitilakis et al. (1999)
Kiku et al. (2001)
Jafari et al. (2002)
Hasanebi and Ulusay (2007)
Hanumantharao and Ramana (2008)
Dikmen (2009)
a
Vs (m/s)
All soils
Sands
Clays
Vs = 19N0.6
Vs = 76N0.33
Vs = 84N0.31
Vs = 92.1N0.337
Vs = 81.4N0.39
Vs = 89.9N0.341
Vs = 91N0.337
Vs = 85.35N0.348
Vs = 61.4N0.5
Vs = 97N0.314
Vs = 97N0.314
Vs = 116.1(N + 0.3185)0.202
Vs = 121N0.27
Vs = 76.2N0.24
Vs = 107.6N0.36
Vs = 32.8N0.51
Vs = 51.5N0.516
Vs = 22N0.85
Vs = 68.3N0.292
Vs = 90N0.309
Vs = 82.6N0.43
Vs = 58N0.39
Vs = 32N0.5
Vs = 87N0.36
Vs = 59.4N0.47
Vs = 80.6N0.331
Vs = 56.4N0.5
Vs = 100.5N0.29
Vs = 152 + 5.1N0.27
Vs = 125N0.3
Vs = 57N0.49
Vs = 162N0.17
Vs = 100N0.24
Vs = 175 + (3.75 N)
Vs = 145(N60)0.178
Vs = 90.82N0.319
Vs = 79N0.434
Vs = 73N0.33
Vs = 102N0.292
Vs = 114N0.31
Vs = 132(N60)0.271
Vs = 27N0.73
Vs = 97.89N0.269
Vs = 44N0.48
11
600
Vs (m/s)
400
300
200
100
10
20
30
40
50
SPT-N30
Kanai (1966)
Fujiwara (1972)
Imai (1977)
Jinan (1987)
Athanasopoulos (1995)
Sisman (1995)
Iyisan (1996)
Dikmen (2009)
This study
This study
600
Vs (m/s)
400
300
200
100
10
20
30
40
50
SPT-N30
Kanai (1966)
Fujiwara (1972)
Imai (1977)
Jinan (1987)
Athanasopoulos (1995)
Sisman (1995)
Iyisan (1996)
Dikmen (2009)
This study
This study
Fig. 13. SPT-N and Vs empirical relations for all soils in Erbaa.
12
450
Alluvial sands
400
350
Vs (m/s)
300
250
200
150
100
50
10
20
Shibata (1970)
Imai (1977)
Seed et al. (1983)
Fumal & Tinsley (1985)
Lee (1990)
Raptakis et al. (1995)
Hasancebi & Ulusay (2007)
Dikmen (2009)
This study
30
SPT-N30
40
50
500
Pliocene sands
400
Vs (m/s)
300
200
100
10
Shibata (1970)
Imai (1977)
Seed et al. (1983)
Fumal & Tinsley (1985)
Lee (1990)
Raptakis et al. (1995)
Hasancebi & Ulusay (2007)
Dikmen (2009)
This study
20
30
SPT-N30
40
50
13
500
Imai (1977)
Alluvial clays
Lee (1990)
400
Jafari et al.
(2002)
300
Vs (m/s)
Hasancebi
& Ulusay
(2007)
Dikmen
(2009)
200
This study
100
This study
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
SPT-N30
500
Imai (1977)
Pliocene clays
Lee (1990)
400
Jafari et al.
(2002)
Vs (m/s)
300
Hasancebi
& Ulusay
(2007)
200
Dikmen
(2009)
This study
100
This study
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
SPT-N30
Fig. 15. SPT-N and Vs empirical relations for clayey soils in Erbaa.
8. General evaluation
Each of the empirical relationships listed in Table 1 expressed
shear wave velocity measurement directly as a function of SPT blow
Fig. 14. SPT-N and Vs empirical relations for sandy soils in Erbaa.
14
Vs (m/s)
Vs (m/s)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
100
200
300
400
500
0
g-1
g-2
g-3
10
Depth (m)
10
Depth (m)
g-4
g-5
15
15
CPT-based Vs
20
g-6
Seismic refraction-based Vs
20
g-7
25
SPT-based uphole (geophone-3)
Average
25
30
Fig. 18. Comparison of shear wave velocity determined from CPT, seismic refraction,
and SPT-based uphole for BH-10 location.
Vs (m/s)
0
100
200
300
400
Vs (m/s)
500
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
BH-4
BH-12
BH-6
BH-23
BH-8
BH-33
BH-10
10
BH-18
10
Depth (m)
BH-28
BH-30
15
Depth (m)
30
15
20
20
25
25
30
30
Fig. 17. Shear wave velocity proles obtained from SPT-based uphole tests (a: alluvial soils, and b: Pliocene soils).
15
Vs (m/s)
100.00
0
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
400.00
5
N=10
10
Depth (m)
N=20
N=30
15
N=40
20
N=50
25
30
35
Vs (m/s)
150.00
0
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
400.00
5
N=10
10
Depth (m)
N=20
N=30
15
N=40
20
N=50
25
30
35
Fig. 19. Comparison of the proposed empirical relations for constant SPT-N value for (a) all alluvial soils, and (b) all Pliocene soils.
r = 0:89
Vs = 38:55N0:176 z0:481
r = 0:94
Vs = 78:1N0:116 z0:35
r = 0:92
Vs = 121:75N0:101 z0:216
0:109 0:426
Vs = 59:44N
Table 2
The results of regression analyses.
Soil type
Alluvial sand
Alluvial clay
All alluvial soils
Pliocene sand
Pliocene clay
All Pliocene soils
Model 1
Model 2
ln
4.0280
4.7037
4.2052
3.7432
4.9479
3.6542
0.4405
0.2629
0.4671
0.4740
0.1941
0.5440
0.3231
0.1564
0.2905
0.3037
0.1512
0.1344
Vs
ln
4.0852
4.8023
4.3576
3.6519
4.9457
3.9523
0.1091
0.1007
0.1162
0.1756
0.0490
0.3588
0.4257
0.2161
0.3505
0.4815
0.2317
0.1772
0.1940
0.0916
0.1883
0.1421
0.0934
0.0656
Vs
0:359 0:177
Vs = 52:04N
r = 0:98
16
Vs = 140:61N0:049 z0:232
Vs = cN z
10
and
lnVs = lnc + d lnN + e lnz
11
17
McGillivray, A.V., Mayne, P.W., 2004. Seismic piezocone and seismic at dilatometer
tests at Treporti. Proceedings of 2nd Int. Conf. on Site Characterization, Porto, 2,
pp. 16951700.
Metropol Muh., 2005. Erbaa (Tokat) Sivi-atik Aritma Tesis Sahasinin Jeoljik-JeoteknikJeozik Etut Raporu, Samsun (unpublished-in Turkish).
Ohba, S., Toriumi, I., 1970. Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. Proceedings
of the Annual Meeting, A. I. J (in Japanese).
Ohsaki, Y., Iwasaki, R., 1973. On dynamic shear moduli and Poisson's ratio of soil
deposits. Soil Found 13, 6173.
Ohta, Y., Goto, N., 1978. Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of
characteristics soil indexes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 6,
167187.
Ohta, T., Hara, A., Niwa, M., Sakano, T., 1972. Elastic shear moduli as estimated from
N-value Proc. 7th Ann. Convention of Japan Society of Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, pp. 265268.
Ohta, Y., Goto, N., Kagami, H., Shiono, K., 1978. Shear wave velocity measurement
during a standard penetration test. Earthquake Engineering and Structural
Dynamics 6, 4350.
Okamoto, T., Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y., Kusuonoki, K., 1989. Comparison of surface versus
subsurface wave source for P-S logging in sand layer. Proceedings of 44th Ann.
Conf. JSCE, 3, pp. 996997 (in Japanese).
Pitilakis, K.D., Anastasiadis, A., Raptakis, D., 1992. Field and laboratory determination of
dynamic properties of natural soil deposits. Proceedings of 10th World Conf.
Earthquake Engineering, Rotherdam 12751280.
Pitilakis, K., Raptakis, D., Lontzetidis, K.T., Vassilikou, T., Jongmans, D., 1999.
Geotechnical and geophysical description of Euro-Seistests, using eld and
laboratory tests, and moderate strong ground motions. Journal of Earthquake
Engineering 3, 381409.
Raptakis, D.G., Anastasiadis, S.A.J., Pitilakis, K.D., Lontzetidis, K.S., 1995. Shear wave
velocities and damping of Greek natural soils. Proceedings of 10th European Conf.
Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, pp. 477482.
Richart, F.E., Hall, J.R., Woods, R.D., 1970. Vibrations of Soils and Foundations. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 414 pp.
Sasitharan, S., Robertson, P.K., Sego, D.C., Morgenstern, N.R., 1994. State-boundary
surface for very loose sand and its practical implications. Canadian Geotechnical
Journal 31, 321334.
Schlumberger, C., 1920. Etude sur la prospection electrique du sous-sol. Gaultier-Villars
et Cie, Paris. 94 pp.
Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J.L., Seed, H.B., 1972. SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake
response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report EERC-72/12, Earthquake
Engineering Research Center (EERC), Berkeley, California.
Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M., 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response
analyses. Rep. No. EERC-70/10, Earthquake Engg. Research Center, Univ. of
California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M., 1981. Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on
observation of performance in previous earthquakes. ASCE National Convention
(MO), pp. 481544.
Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M., Arango, I., 1983. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using eld
performance data. J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE 109, 458482.
Seed, R.B., Cetin, K.O., Moss, R.E.S., Kammerer, A.M., Wu, J., Pestana, J.M., Riemer, M.F.,
Sancio, R.B., Bray, J.D., Kayen, R.E., Faris, A., 2003. Recent advances in soil
liquefaction engineering: a unied and consistent framework. 26th Annual ASCE
Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Long Beach, CA, ASCE, Reston, VA, 71.
Sengor, A.M.C., Gorur, N., Saroglu, F., 1985. Strikeslip faulting and related basin
formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. In: Biddle, K.,
Christie-Blick, N. (Eds.), StrikeSlip Deformation, Basin Formation, Sedimentation:
SEPM Spec. Publ., 37, pp. 227264.
Shibata, T., 1970. Analysis of liquefaction of saturated sand during cyclic loading.
Disaster Prevention Res. Inst. Bull. 13, 563570.
Shibuya, S., Yamashita, S., Mitachi, T., Tanaka, H., 1995. Effects of sample disturbance on
Gmax of soilsa case study. 1st International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 1, p. 77.
Sisman, H., 1995. An investigation on relationships between shear wave velocity, and
SPT and pressuremeter test results. MSc Thesis, Ankara University, Geophysical
Engineering Department, Ankara, 75 p (in Turkish).
Stewart, J.P., Liu, A.H., Choi, Y., 2003. Amplication factors for spectral acceleration in
tectonically active regions. Bulletin. Seismological Society of America 93 (1),
332352.
Sykora, D.E., Stokoe, K.H., 1983. Correlations of in-situ measurements in sands of shear
wave velocity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 20, 125136.
Tonouchi, K., Sakayama, T., Imai, T., 1983. S wave velocity in the ground and the
damping factor. Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geologists 2627, 327333.
Wills, C.J., Silva, W., 1998. Shear wave velocity characteristics of geologic units in
California. Earthquake Spectra 14 (3), 533556.
Yilmaz, I., 1998. Kklce Reglatr-Erbaa HES Iletim Hatti Gzergahindaki Alvyal
Zeminlerin ime ve Oturma Sorunlarinin Jeomhendislik Deerlendirmesi Ph.D.
thesis, Cumhuriyet Univ., Sivas, 102 p., unpublished (in Turkish).
Yokota, K., Imai, T., Konno, M., 1991. Dynamic deformation characteristics of soils
determined by laboratory tests. OYO Tee. Rep. 3, p. 13.