Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Example 13.2.1. Galileo found that if you throw a ball from the ground straight
upinto the air with the intial velocity (speed) of v 0 feet per second, then the height
in feet is given by
2
ht =16 t v 0 t .
Suppose we throw a ball straight up from the ground with initial velocity of 4 feet
per second. What is the maximum height the ball will reach? We can solve this
problem as before by expressing h as a translation of the function ht =16 t 2 and
then locating the vertex (by completing the square). We solve to find the ball
reaches a height of 1/4 feet, or 3 inches.
-------Of course, the success of the previous example relied crucially on our ability to
express the problem in terms of a previously known problem, shifting the function
y=x 2 . In general we have no such way of doing so.
The question then becomes, given a function f, is it possible to find the tangent line
at any point x=a ? And if so, how do we find it? You might see why this problem
was of interest to mathematicians in the 17th century, as well as today. For suppose
the function represents distance traveled. Then we would find that the slope of the
tangent line would give us the instantaneous velocity, meaning the exact velocity
at the exact time in question. Or perhaps the function would represent earnings at
time t. In this case the slope of the tangent line would represent the instantaneous
rate of change of the earnings.
Example 13.4.1. Find the slope of the tangent line to the function y= x 2 at x=1.
From the figure we can see that if we can find the value of c, we can find the slope
of the line between 0, c and 1,1. Since this line is perpendicular to the tangent
line of the function y= x 2 at x=1 we can easily obtain the tangent line. We begin
by writing the equation of the circle (from the figure)
x 2 yc2=r 2 .
As the circle will pass the point (1,1), we can set x=1, y=1 in the above equation
to get a relation involving only r and c.
11c2=r 2
r 2=c 22 c2 .
If we place this value of r 2 into the original equation for the circle above, we have
2
x y 2 cy2 c2=0 .
So far we haven't used any facts about the function y= x 2 (other than the fact that
it passes through the point (1,1) of course). If we substitute y=x 2 into the latest
equation for the circle we will find that the y-values of the points lying both on the
circle and on the function y= x 2 . So, substituting in we then have
y y 22 cyc22=0 .
and that the quadratic equation will give at most two solutions, (see the figure
below)
Of course, the choice we are looking for is the single intersection. This
corresponds to the right-hand-side of the figure. When is there a single solution to
the quadratic equation x 2 x=0 ? When 24 =0 . In this case, this
means when
12 c2412 c2=0.
Solving this equation for c gives a value of 3/2. Now that we know c we can
calculate the slope of the line passing through the radius of the circle as
3
1
2
1
slope of radial line=
= .
01
2
As the slope of the tangent line is perpendicular to the slope of the radial line, we
find the slope of the tangent line at y=x 2 at x=1 to be 2.
-----
The tangent line at the point P is drawn. Fermat argued that if we choose a point
P ' a small distance along the curve from P then triangle PQR is similar to triangle
PTS. Therefore we can relate the sides as follows,
RQ PT
E
=
=
.
PQ ST ST
E1
E
E
1
=
=
=
.
2
2
2
1E 1 12 EE 1 2EE 2E
Now, without justification, Fermat said that since E was very small already, go
ahead and take E to be zero. The result is, of course
RQ=
1
2
13.6 Areas
1
=2 , the same answer as that
1/2
The problem of computing the area under a curve goes back to antiquity.
Archimedes was the first do devise a method for computing such areas. His
method was called the method of exhaustion. This method involved
approximatingthe area using a series of rectangles like that shown below.
ba
,
n
then we may compute the area by summing up the areas of each of the small
rectangles.
area= f ae f aee f a2 ee f bee
By computing the areas of the smaller rectangles we can get an approximation for
the area lying underneath the graph of y=f(x). Archimedes found that the more
rectangles you use, the sum of the small rectangles gets closer and closer to some
finite number.
This number he claimed to be the actual area underneath the function y=f(x). This
would not be proven until the invention of calculus thousands of years later.
The problem of finding the length of a curve was considered impossible to solve
for much of the history of thinking. The idea that a curved segment could have
exactly the same length as a straight segment did not even seem possible to most
mathematicians. That was until some people began to approximate the lengths of
the curves by inscribing polygons about the curves (see below) finding that the
lengths became increasingly more and more accurate the shorter the segment
between polygon vertices became (between the big black dots in the figure).
In the process of his computation of the arc length of a segment of y=x 3/ 2 , Fermat
made a remarkable connection that linked three of the four major
problems facing the 17th century mathematicians. It was this discovery that would
finally lead to the idea of the derivative. Unfortunately for Mr. Fermat, he was
unable to realize the connection that he had made. And for this reason he is forever
eclipsed by Newton and Leibnitz in the Calculus Hall of Fame. Better luck next
time, Mr.
As shown previously, Fermat devised a technique for finding tangent lines. Using
this method he was able to find that at the point x=a the tangent line had the
slope
3 1/2
a . The equation of the tangent line to the function y=x 3/ 2 then is given
2
by
3
y= a 1/ 2 xa b .
2
3
9
AC = AB BC =e a 1/ 2 e =e 2 1 a ,
2
4
2
9
AC=e 1 a .
4
9
h x= 1 x ,
4
The discovery Newton and Leibnitz would make (independent and unknowingly of
each other) was that the problem of computing the area under a curve is actually
the inverse problem of finding the tangent line to a curve, and vice versa.