Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Submitted to
Ministry of Shipping
Government of India
September 2014
Prepared by,
Mumbai Port Trust Land Development Committee
This work consists of a printed book and release of its contents in PDF format in the World Wide
Web; and is subjectto copyright. All rights are reserved, whether whole or in part of the material
are concerned, specifically the rights oftranslation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on CDROM or in any other way, andstorage in data banks. Duplication
of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of theIndian Copyright
Act in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Ministry of
Shipping,Government of India, and New Delhi.
Ministry of Shipping orMumbai Port Trust Land Development Committee make no warranty of
representation, either express or implied with respect to thiswork, including their quality,
merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event will Min. of Shipping orMumbai
Port Trust Land development committeebe liable for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or
consequential damages arising out of the use or inability touse the work, even if Min. of Shipping
or Mumbai Port Trust Land Development Committee have been advised of the possibility of such
damages.The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc., in this
publication does not imply, even inthe absence of specific statement, that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and regulations andtherefore free for general use.
27 October 2014
Shri Nitin Gadkari
Honourable Minister of Shipping,
Ministry of Shipping, Government of India,
New Delhi 110001.
Shri Nitin Gadkari,
We submit herewith the Mumbai Port Land Development Report.
Yours sincerely,
Foreword
India.
stakeholders
concerned
in
and
Rejuvenation
of
when,
exercise
of
the
coincidentally,
Revision
of
the
the
in
progress.
One
need
not
for
redeployment.
That
larger
public
good,
without
planning
and
scenic
eastern
waterfront
of
mill
lands
which
belonged
to
required
legal
and
institutional
available
for
the
rejuvenation
of
be
connectivity,
used
for
improving
augmenting
public
Chairpersons Note
Rani A. Jadhav;
IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman of MbPT.
Chairperson MPLDC
product
state
departments
holistic
the
many
years
structures,
with
old
unregulated
dilapidated
slums
and
of
and
multiple
brainstorming
central
and
agencies.
manner.
preparation
government
of
The
an
report
The
is
actionable
an
These
overwhelming
response.
Government
an
inclusive,
environmentally
sustainable
friendly
and
manner.
world
development
class
plan
physical
private
derelict,
have
difficult-to-trace
was,
the
essential
and
to
by
and
therefore,
backed
Agencies
envision
development
agencies.
port
eligible
proposed.
streaming
to
the
MPLDC
that
its
slum
rationalizing
related
dwellers
Right-sizing
the
of
port
activity,
have
been
and
right-
activities
existing
land
and
use
rightful
role
in
the
economic
solutions
encompassing
water
been
analysed
and
manner,
an
enabling
legal
MPLDC
acknowledges
with
MPLDC acknowledges
valuable
guidance
received
the
from
Acknowledgements
The Mumbai Port Land Development Committee (MPLDC) is thankful to the Ministry of
Shipping, Government of India for constituting this Committee for preparing a road map
for the development of Mumbai ports waterfront and Port lands.
We are also thankful to officials of various government authorities including Shri Sitaram
Kunte (Municipal Commissioner, MCGM), UPS Madan (Metropolitan Commissioner,
MMRDA), Anil Diggikar (Vice Chairman & MD, MSRDC), Dr. Jagdish Patil (MD, MTDC), O.P.
Gupta (GM, BEST), Parag Jain (CEO, MMB), Dr. Raghuram Rajan (Governor, RBI) and a
host of organisations and individuals from India and abroad who very generously and
wholeheartedly gave their suggestions and inputs to the Committee in the preparation of
the MPLDC Report. The proposals suggested by government agencies is at Annexure D
while the suggestions received from individuals and other bodies is at Annexure C.
We would also like to place on record gratitude to all those who have helped in gathering
information and making recommendations. In this context we wish to thank Mr. Pathak
(Ex. Chief Town Planner, MMRDA), Shri Anil Sardana (CEO & MD, Tata Power), Ms. Urmi
Mankar, Shri Shivjit Siddhu (Principal Architect, Apostrophe A+ uD), Ms. Ravneet Padda,
Ms. Hrydal Damani, Shri Chandrasekhar Bhave,ex. IAS, Mrs. Geeta Mehta, Columbia
University, Shri Sarang Kulkarni, Pune, Ms. Surekha of Agakhan, Ms. Sulakshana Mahajan
(MTSU), Ms. Prachi Merchant (Urban Planning, MTSU), Dr. Shirish Sankhe (Director,
McKinsey & Company), Shri Krishnan Vishwanathan (McKinsey & Company), Shri Mohan
Chandran (Ex.Secretary, Mumbai Port Trust), Shri S.M. Patil (Ex.Estate Manager, Mumbai
Port Trust), Shri Sanjay Ubale (MD & CEO, Tata Realty & Infrastructure), Mr. Menzes (Yes
Bank) and Ms. Sapna Lakhe (Sankraman Design Studio).
Mumbai Port Land Development Committee (MPLDC) would like to place on record its
grateful thanks to Urban Design Research Institute research team constituting Pankaj
Joshi (Executive Director), Omkar Gupta (Director), Keya Kunte (Director), Apurwa
Kumbhar (Associate Director) and Pooja Chichkar (Associate Director) and their entire
team for their tireless efforts in providing requisite research material.
Special thanks are due to the officials and entire staff of Mumbai Port Trust including Shri
BJ Patil (Chief Engineer), Gautam Dey(Sr.Dy.Traffic Manager), HP Kulkarni (Dy.Estate
Manager), Vijay G. Thorat(PS to Chairman, MPLDC), Mukesh Nawani (PA to Chairman,
MPLDC) and Ganesh Pol for their contribution and secretarial support.
.
Contents
Foreword .......................................................................................... 4
Chairpersons Note ........................................................................... 6
Acknowledgements .......................................................................... 9
Executive Summary ........................................................................ 16
(To be drafted)................................................................................ 16
1
Introduction ............................................................................. 19
2.2
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
Port
35
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
Delineation.......................................................................................................... 53
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
3.4.1
Land let out by the Port for port and non-port uses .................................. 62
3.4.2
VacantLand ................................................................................................. 63
3.4.3
Encroachments ........................................................................................... 64
3.5
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.6
Impact of Supreme Court Judgement in 2004 and 2006 on MbPT Land ............ 71
3.6.1
Background ................................................................................................. 71
3.6.2
3.6.3
3.7
3.7.1
3.7.2
3.7.3
Railway Container Depot is not being used for storing containers but for parking
of vehicles prior to their export. The railway platforms with railway sidings
aresparingly used. ....................................................................................................... 91
3.7.4
3.7.5
3.7.6
3.7.7
3.7.8
3.7.9
3.7.10
Operational areas: Indira Dock,Jetties are Pir Pau and Jawahar Deep)..... 96
3.7.11
3.7.12
3.7.13
3.7.14
3.7.15
3.7.16
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.3
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
4.5
4.5.1
4.5.2
Proposed Spatial Organization Strategy for Mumbais Port Land ............ 115
4.6
4.6.1
4.6.2
4.6.3
Suggested Programmes for Land Available for Non-Port Use .................. 118
4.7
4.7.1
4.7.2
4.7.3
4.7.4
4.7.5
4.8
4.9
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.1.1
5.2.1.2
5.2.1.3
5.2.1.4
5.2.1.5
5.2.2
5.3
5.4
5.4.1
Priority actions for Port Land Development to be taken by MbPT: ................. 193
6.2
6.3
6.3.1
6.3.2
Define Land Development in various zones / Land Use classifications .... 194
6.3.3
6.3.4
6.3.5
6.3.6
Along with labour rehabilitation and employment generation, the MPLDA will
set up programmes to develop capacities of the existing labour to take up jobs that
have emerged in newer areas due to the regeneration and re-development projects
like that of special industries and enterprises. These programmes will include
monitoring the capacity of existing labour, formulating capacity building exercises
from time totime and monitoring the impact of the capacity building exercises. ... 196
6.3.8
6.3.9
7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3
7.1.4
7.1.5
Maharashtra Rent Control Act and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code .... 203
7.1.6
7.1.7
7.2
7.2.1
7.3
7.3.1
7.3.2
7.4
Legislative Actions for the development of Mumbai Port Lands: .................... 208
7.4.1
Policy actions required for the setting of a Special Planning Authority (SPA)
209
8.2
8.2.1
Time frame for setting up the institutional frame work and phasing of
8.2.3
8.2.5
8.2.6
8.2.7
8.2.8
8.2.9
8.2.10
Next steps for the redevelopment of Mumbai Port Trust Lands .............. 230
8.2.11
8.2.12
8.2.13
Executive Summary
(To be drafted)
16
1: Introduction
18
1 Introduction
offers a wide
variety of leisure,
global
de-
syndrome
of
the
Mumbai,
processes
and
social,
of
gentrification
economic,
cultural
and
the
Mumbai
Port
Land
manner.
contributors to the
various
founding and
agencies
responsible
for
providing
handling
mechanisms
and
deeper
supporting
infrastructure.
transparent
land
presents
for
an
opportunity
19
coverage
approach.Since
encompasses
its
about
lands.
development
lands.
as
individuals,
expressed
groups
by
and
organisations/institutions
responded
business
venues,
global
tourist
Committee
has
20
in
generous
who
numbers
21
22
23
24
2: MbPTPort Overview
25
26
2 MbPTPort Overview
of
services/facilities
to
maintenance
of
It has an
cruise passengers.
crafts,
hectares.
upcoming
Container
Offshore
This
includes
covered
Indira
27
The principal
handling
Dangerous
(OCT) berths.
5969.
handling
vessels
chemical
International
liquid
petroleum
oil
and
(60.8%
Liquid
Bulk
16.2%
28
The
port
to
ship
berthday
output,
turnaround
29
table
below
indicates
the
II
Operational Information
1. Cargo Throughput
2. Ship Berthday Output
3. Average Parcel Size
4. Turnaround time of Vessel
5. Berth Occupancy Levels
6. Warehouse area
Warehouse Occupancy Level
7. Revenue
from
storage
&
Warehousing
(including demurrage)
Financial Information
1. Operating Income
a
Liquid Cargo + Pipeline + Stream +
Vessel
b
General Cargo (Other than 'a'
above)
i) Docks
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
MMTPA
MT/day
MT
Days
%
Hectares
%
Rs in Crore
Rs in Crore
11-12
56.20
7729
19752
2.96
57.58
169.58
12-13
58.07
9017
22023
2.85
51.22
13.18
30 to 40
181.87
13-14
59.18
9415
21554
2.88
43.29
321.21
528.90
639.78
656.87
Rs in Crore
360.98
383.94
404.98
ii) Bunders
Rs in Crore
30.16
32.97
32.78
iii) Others
(Octroi,Stampduty and
etc.)
Total General Cargo (i+ii+iii)
Rs in Crore
41.90
47.64
21.42
C&P
Rs in Crore
433.04
464.57
459.19
Rs in Crore
134.33
122.99
248.54
Rs in Crore
1096.27
1227.34
1364.60
30
Rs in Crore
201.41
225.66
250.24
Rs in Crore
491.59
620.91
607.03
Rs in Crore
Rs in Crore
Rs in Crore
66.86
234.82
994.68
33.32
275.7
1155.59
33.97
278.33
1169.57
Rs in Crore
Rs in Crore
Rs in Crore
Rs in Crore
102
485.28
674.29
- 87.42
72
452.24
794.62
- 270.63
195
347.88
903.61
- 360.70
III
Operational Income
Per MT
195
211
231
2.
3.
Operating Expenditure
Contribution
for
superannuation expenditure
(Pension + Gratuity + Leave
Encashment)
Number of Employees
Employee Cost
Employee cost Per Ton of
Cargo
Dredging Cost
Per MT
Rs in Crore
177
598
199
693
198
705
No.
Rs in Crore
Rs./T
16366
751
134
15281
903
155
12191
900
151
Rs in Crore
(Approx.)
Rs./T
Rs in Crore
36
30
44
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
31
6.31
5.07
7.32
Approximately 170 Crore
Rs.656.87Cr.
operating
Rs.250.24Cr.
These
apportioned
An
analysis
of
the
figures
do
is
an
not
between
liquid
only
overall
include
cargo
The
operating
areas.
shows
operating
14.
stream
on
estate
expenses
from
increase
cargo
significant
is
32
F and M
expenditure
mainly
represents
Funds.
viability/desirabilityof
existing activities.
past
liability
or
Cr.
as
on
31.03.2014.
from OCT.
Looking at the overall profitability of the
Port, it will be seen that the last 3 years
have consistently shown an increase in
the net deficit from Rs.87.42 Cr. in
2011-12 to Rs.360.70 Cr. in 2013-14.
Since both liquid cargo including vessel
operations and stream discharge of
cargo, on the one hand, and estate
income on the other, are profitable, it
can be concluded that these losses are
on account of two main factors i.e dock
and
bunder
operations
and
the
33
sectors
articulating
the
western coast
presence
of
an
of India. The
excellent
natural
of
the
citys
itself
economy
amongst
the
Mumbai
led
to massive
land
2.3.2
for
the
development
of
the
the
Producer
which
were
for
based
from
on
being
Industrial
Services
like
finance,
the
transformations,
necessary
economy
abovementioned
citys
predominantly
up
towards
take
investments
to
of
port
lack
the
De-industrialisation of
Mumbai
the
2.10)
34
Image 2-1 Ship breaking activities on Tank bunder imgae source- UDRI
2.3.3 Issues
of
Technological
Shortcomings and Draught
Depths of the Mumbai Port
of
newer
years.
and
surrounding
deeper
which
meters.
regions
with
35
is
currently
Contemporary
under
shipping
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
2.4 Proposed
modernization
and
development projects of
MbPT by 2020
The Present cargo handling capacity
(2013-14) of Mumbai Port is 49.25 MMT
(Indira
Dock-11.25
MMT,
Present
Capacity
ID
MOT JD and
PP
Anchorages
2nd Liquid
Chemical
Berth
Off-shore
Multipurpose
Cargo Berth
Harbour Wall
Berth
Cement
Terminal
OCT
Edible Oil and
Base Oil
Anchorages
Other
Initiatives
TOTAL(MMT)
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
49.25
49.25
50.25
56.00
11.25
---
---
---
---
32.00
---
---
---
---
6.00
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.50
---
---
---
---
2.00
---
---
---
2.00
---
---
1.25
---
---
1.00
---
8.60
---
---
1.00
---
---
---
---
---
1.00
0.75
49.25
50.25
56.00
72.35
43
3.00
2.4.1
January 2016.
1. Construction of off-shore
container terminal berths:
2015
44
th
th
coastal vessels.
2. Redevelopment
Wall berths:
of
Harbour
45
Port.
The
Mumbai
Development
Port
Trust
Committee
development project.
December 2014.
Land
for
7. Anchorage Project
Consequently,
up this terminal.
6. Bunkering Terminal
46
medical
treatment
employees
8. Floating Storage
regasification Unit (FSRU)
infrastructure
with
to
the
modern
and
MbPT
medical
widen
the
prepare
it is proposed to
workable
scheme
for
Projects
under
segment of MbPT
leisure
1. Development of Marina:
pipeline.
The
MbPT
the
has
also
approved
Small ships
47
crores.
of
passengers
and
completion
of
to
bring
about
system,
lighting
and
air-
and
provision
is
telephone.
to
be
Separate
made
improvement
plan
This
for
5. Sassoon
Dock
Fishery
Harbour Improvement Plan
offices etc.
48
crores.
This
improvement
plan
is
suggested
to
wheel
at
construct
an
49
50
51
52
3 Existing Situation
Analysis
3.1 Delineation
study area.
city on water.
53
54
55
56
57
58
Chairman
Bunglow,
Chowpatty
Bunder,
Worli
Bunder,Zakaria
Bunder,
Govandi,
59
Type of land
Hectares
A)
i.
ii.
Staff quarters
iii.
Hospital
iv.
196.50
48.79
4.68
21.73
271.70
B)
i.
73.27
ii.
Defence Authority
32.58
iii.
PSUs
iv.
v.
vi.
Private parties
136.73
275.55
2.26
25.73
4.99
C)
i.
ii.
63.62
D)
-39.75
23.87
Infrastructure land
150.12
(A)+ (B)+(C)+(D)
721.24
E)
i.
2.62
ii.
Govandi
7.58
iii.
Mahim Bunder
1.53
11.73
F)
i.
1.98
ii.
Chowpatty Bunder
0.182
iii.
Chairman's Bunglow
iv.
0.93
28.39
31.48
(2)
43.21
(3)
709.51
752.72
60
3.4.1
Lands
held
in
perpetuity by MbPT
3.4.3
used
which
Collector
Dept.
11.8.1882..
Reclamation
admeasuring
and
are
collected
No.5408
is
by
dated
Estate
currently
subleased
for
operational
purposes
is
The
warehousing purposes.
and
3.4.2
for
about
34,000
pensioners.
Vacant lands
8%
18%
Hospital
72%
61
possession
and
clubs,
non-port purposes
amenities
(sports,
of
oil
and
petroleum
3.4.1
USER
CATEGORY
NUMBER OF
LEASES
Port Related
Petroleum/ Oil
Sectors
77
P.S.U.
51
TOTAL
128
Non
Related
2548
Defence Authority
PSUs
12%
9%
1%
2%
62
Central Government
bodies
State Govt. bodies
3.4.2
VacantLand
Note:
In addition to above, land at Titwala,
28.39 hectares.
Location
No.
of
Area (m2)
plots
vacant
near
Wadala Sewree
Estate
21
83614.75
Sewree Estate
10
2233.43
Cotton Depot
147
56116.88
future.
These
lands
though
48
32372.17
M.S.R. Estate
5755.69
Bunder,
OGPD,
admeasuring
Opp.
1928.41
1507.99
Estate
2686.54
Elphinstone Estate
14
1651.13
Elphinstone Estate
70
14937.39
Modybay Estate
415.74
Apollo Estate
22
4620.22
Bunders
79
22873.07
Maz. Reclamation
Estate
Maz. Reclamation
Ballard and
at
Cotton
Green
respectively.
In
Mahim, Mallet
Bunder, Jamshetji
Bunder, Sassoon
Dock
16
7932.81
TOTAL
460
238646.22
23.86 Ha.
have
been
filed
against
private
63
Marina
and/
or
Passenger terminal.
3.4.3
Encroachments
by
the
Port
(Estate
Under
use
Resources
3.5.2
of
The
Growth
Sector
process
of
in
the
Informal
de-industrialisation
large
infrastructure
and
warehousing,
transport
were
unloading
like
facilities,
loading
infrastructure,
areas
in
Mumbais
Eastern
64
served
by
migrant,
daily
wage,
are
sub-optimally
65
66
67
68
69
70
3.6 Impact
of
Supreme
Court Judgement in
2004 and 2006 on MbPT
Land
3.6.1
Further,
Background
land
based
valuation report.
on
Kirloskar's
occupations,
around
2424
plots
monthly lease
dated 04.10.1990.
affected
Thereafter, in the
by
Supreme
Court
compromise
was
compromise
also
gave
its
proposal
which
formula
verdict
on
was
13.01.2004
these leases.
1.9.2006
with
6%
of
the
Ready
Maharashtra
with
Addl.
judgement.
Court's
01.10.2012
clarifications
The
given
by
Supreme
71
Rent
while
Control
regularizing
Act,
such
Court judgement.
3.6.2
Issues
pertaining
development of let
lands:
The
MbPT
Petitioners.
Ministry of Shipping, Government of
India
came
out
with
New
Land
Land
to
out
Development
the
limitations
if
any
on
the
development of estates.
Management
for
Policy,
2014
72
functions
revenue
01.10.2012
keeping
in
mind
the
received
statutorily
from
the
1. Implications of Supreme
Court judgement on the
proposed Development of let
out areas by short closing of
leases and by taking back of
possession etc.
are
judgement.
recover
which
land
clearly
exists
The
Public
Premises
Act
already
consuming.
defaulting
tenant
or
occupant.
wish
laws.
within
the
applicable
73
are
the
non-
as
and
such
reasonable
manner
fair,
2002
contains
Code.
to
be
strengthenedis
provisions
to
adequate
the
Estate Officer.
Estate
Officersand
giving
them
the
implication
co-ordination
local
acts
and
suitable
their
Slum
both
the
of
the
considered.
enforcement
with
various
agencies
be
alternative
provide
accommodation
obliged to provide
alternative
74
discriminatory
alternative
from
the
occupants.
75
scheme
to
accommodation
offer
to
the
3.6.3
Legal Implications on
Current Lease Status and
Tenure Patterns
Monthly
1759
66.31
2788
275.55
Tenancies
TOTAL
326
Subsisting
Leases
Expired leases
462
1759
241
Fifteen monthly
leases
Monthly
Tenancy
months
regularly,
continue
66.31
99.6
Subsisting Leases
in
Expired leases
98.99
Fifteen monthly
leases
Monthly Tenancy
10.4
the
TENURE
Subsisting
NUMBER
326
defaulting
tenants/lessees
by
AREA
(in
Hectare)
99.86
Leases
Expired Leases
462
98.99
breaches,
Fifteen Monthly
241
10.40
Leases
entire
76
followed
legal
by
proceedings
cross
take
that
thereby
further
prolonging
the
against
the
defaulting
in
obtaining
vacant
repossesses
the
compromise
concessional
litigation.
1590
the
compromise
formulae
77
by
MbPT.
78
79
80
81
82
83
Drawing 3-6 Activities within Port Land
84
85
86
of
Timber
existing
recent
Pond
(STP),
the
construction.
Further
87
2. Nadkarni
Industries
used
by
the
Oil
Park
and
Oil
Companies.
Estate.
completely
industries.
encroached
upon
by
Chembur.
88
Wadala
and
Traffic Manager.
and
Sewri
Stations
89
exists a
regard
the
construction
of
3.7.3
Cotton Depot
Hindustan
oil
requested
Transit
Freight
refineries
of
Corporation
Bharat
Ltd.
companies
Storage,
and
have
Container
Nagar.
down immediately.
permanent
structures
are
allowed
90
MCGM.
prices in Mumbai.
B)
Cotton
Depot
(The
Railway
Container Yard)
agencies
Mumbai
port
Coal Depot
has
91
use.
sheds.
anymore.
storage of coal.
92
Bunder
supply
offshore
Hay
transporting
to
ships
Bunder
and
for
be initiated by MbPT..
3.7.6
hardly
proceedings
HLL.
has
Activities
utilized.Eviction
such
as
coal
and
mixed
uses
warehousing,
rock
commercial
which
include
workshops,and
and
residential
uses.
to port activities.
be discontinued.
93
additional
and
existing
activities
have
no
areas
is
pending
with
Lakri
bunder
and
Tank
bunder
Darukhana)
school etc
Britania
or coal traffic.
The
area
accommodates
Issues
affecting
the
Bunder
and
Darukhana
94
breaking
area
congested
finger
activities
in
locality.The
the
open
by
informal
access.
3.7.9
amenities.
Chief
non-port based.
drainage,
water
supply
with
the
problem
being
compounded
by
Basin
without
any
treatment.
them
Engineers
Mechanical
Lakri
unusable
for
any
meaningful development.
95
pulses
cargo.Issues
Wharf Area:
The
and
uncleared
number
of
fishing
trawlers
private individuals.
accommodating
cities of Gujarat.
export goods.
about
3.5
lakh
support
for
the
offshore
the
This
includes
covered
96
among
others,
the
MbPT
grain
given
on
monthly
tenancy.
The
alternative
city.
97
by MCGM.
implemented.
conflict
There
is
effectively conserved.
exploitation.
Although
accommodation
is
by
alternative
available
commercial
the
units.Though
space
destinations
in
housing
there,
informal
Wadala
success.
needs to be considered.
CBD activities.
98
Reclamation
twentieth
buildings
century
listed
the
largest
concentration
of
Mumbai.
Area
revenue
does
not
the
land.
The
many
ongoing
99
would
require
Municipal
permission
Commissioner
of
the
and
the
Heritage Committee.
expanded
the
Sassoon
Dock
by
fishing harbor.
completely
making
prestigious
Net
redevelopment
House, etc.
Drying.
encroached
Slum
buildings
like
Kennery
100
areas.
STC etc.
From
the
preliminary
information
101
102
4:Vision
103
104
redevelopment
economic
The
to
activities,
achieve
tourism,
However,
with
the
4.1 Objectives
of
the
Mumbai Port Lands
Redevelopment
Mumbai
port,
and
envisages
105
4.
5.
6.
7.
106
107
4.2
in its recommendations.
4.2.2
City Integration:
The
opportune
adjacent
opportunity
time,
for
port
when
lands
Greater
Mumbai
Land Consolidation
Land Use Efficiency:
and
analysing
strategic
areas;
under-developed
consolidation
and
unused
of
transportation.The
MPLDC
was
recommendations.
108
Several
programmes
public
lands.
BRTS,
Activities
for
related
to
new
GREEN,
city,
and
road
with
resplendent
open
transit,
connectivity.
water-edge
water
hitherto
smart
and
eco-sensitive
built-
environment.
deteriorated
environment
environmental
and
implications
the
of
4.3 The
principles
intelligent urbanism
recommendations.
of
actual
planning
decisions
can
be
Redevelopment
re-imagine
docklands redevelopment.
Principle One:
is
to
The ten
regional
and
national
accessibility,
109
systems.
zones.
environmental
assessment
of
Principle Four:
natural
systems
and
Conviviality
encourages
social
This
the
making.
principle
promotes
Principle Two:
Principle Five :
It seeks to
like
Ballard
estate,
Sewree
Fort,
planned
respects
and
of values.
heritage
precincts
Technology
materials,
building
promotes
techniques,
comfort,
in
Principle Three:
Appropriate
achievements
Principle Six:
geo-climatic
pedestrian-oriented
110
urban
at
locations.
distance,
as
opposed
to
mono-
more
central
inter-connected
Principle Nine:
Balanced
lots.
automobile.
Movement
promotes
Principle Seven:
around
facilities,
of
tourism,
plans
providing
variety
employment,
business,
which
are
facilitated
clustered
by
high
multi-modal
learning
experiences
enhanced
knowledge,
promoting
skills
Principle Ten:
and
lands
will
become
vehicle
for
opportunity.
Principle Eight:
emplacement
transparent,
of
accountable,
competent
and
and
environmental,
and
due
metropolitan
economic,
social
cultural
on
civic
These
111
entitlements,
It
focus
on
ideal
h)
overall
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
o)
112
4.4 Components
of
proposed Vision
the
broad
land
organization
which
have
been
Committee.
The
This
Proposed
and
Strategy:
suggests
the
Transportation
Infrastructure
broad
mobility
113
agencies
incorporated.
The
have
newly
4.5 Proposed
Spatial
Organization Strategy
been
available
4.5.1
In
the
last
from
few
transformations
Global
decades,
in
the
with
shipping
hall mark.
4.4.3
Lessons
Examples
Proposed
Strategy:
Environmental
in
utilization.
complexities
of
adopted
Some
of
for
the
land
salient
are:
principles
occupancies
water transit;
need
to
be
incorporated
for
realities
realistic
phased
creation
proposals,
and
make
along
more
with
114
high-quality
sports,
recreational,
cultural,
and
entertainment venues;
Provision
of
spaces
for
Making
availability
use
to
of
meet
new
the
land
citys
under-used
oriented developments.
medical,
recreational
and
civic
Optimizing
upon
the
for
new
public-
land
waterfront,
in
order
to
maintain
4.5.2
Proposed
Spatial
Organization Strategy for
Mumbais Port Land
civic
plazas
promenades
with
or
street
pedestrian
shopping
Mumbais
spatial
been
the
organization
proposed
port
lands,
strategy
keeping
in
a
has
mind
publicly
waterfront
development.
Considering
the
115
waterfront
promenade
along
the
through
of
pedestrian
connectors.
continuous
water-front
mixed-use,
road provisions.
transit-oriented
located.
Rebranding
the
eastern
of
parallel
public
marinas, as
international
possibility
cruise
to
reuse
well
as
the
terminal.
The
existing
rail
Ensuring
interchangeability
ease
between
of
these
116
4.6 Broad
Strategy
Land
Use
private
from
The
the
public
at
large.
excluding
oil
parties,
godown facilities.
mediation
strategy
of
consolidation or re-allocation in
are
eastern
11.73
namely,
consolidation
located
waterfront.
on
In
Mahim
the
addition,
Bunder,
Worli
of
vacant
areas,
Vision
for
comprehensive
already
initiated
by
the
ports
visioning exercise.
suggested.
The
possibly
by
being
available,
Committee
envisions,
twenty
spaces
Estate,
and
Apollo
Reclamation
at
various
scales
of
strategy.
new uses.
4.6.2
Suggested Utilization of
Land Available for NonPort Use
sought
representative
government
118
from
several
of
stakeholders
various
agencies,
citizens
land
mind
of
open spaces.
the
overall
objective
Open Spaces
Mix Uses
International
Cruise
Terminal,
Centre,
Adventure
Floating
Hotels
Sports
and
Centre,
Restaurants,
should
publicly
be
developed
as
Development of an international /
Training
Enterprise
Entrepreneurship
connecting
Cross
Elephanta
Caves,
119
Institutes,
Zones,
Knowledge
Innovation
Hubs,
&
Incubation
related
The current transportation situation
shows a general disconnect between
creation of
and
airports,
the
connectivity
to
as
diminished significantly.
Marine
Engineering
College,
already
central
new
and
attractive
recreational,
in
the
agencies.
pipeline
The
to
Port
be
land
mobility
for
the
port
120
lands
lands.
strategy
integrated
creating
multi-modal
an
transport
train stops.
public transport.
Strategy,
discussed
earlier,
mass
facilities;
underground
infrastructure.
through
maximizing
parks
represented
by
and
blue
the
links
waterfront
non-motorized transit.
allow
for
selection
planned
or
121
infrastructure
as
well
as
namely:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
4.7.1
Rail Transit
Road Transit
Bus Transit
Water Transit
Non-motorized Transit, and
Other Special Transit Modes
Proposed
Rail
Network Strategy
Transit
MbPT
Thereare
Freight
Rail
two
freight
Connectivity:
rail
related
Delhi-Mumbai
dedicated
freight
new
freight
rail
infrastructure
to
122
(NMIA).
between
considered,
namely,
CFS),
the
proposal,
Metro
commuter
However,
various
factors,
to
Vashi,
due
Kurla,
Comprehensive
the
increase
The
Rail:
Mankhurd,
require
above.
Road,
would
freight connectivity.
Wadala
this
anticipated
Wadala
Wadala
currently
and
is
Road
the
Reay
Andheri
Chembur,
(11.4
Kms)
has
been
Belapur,
123
i.
Backbay.
via
Airport
Metro
with
Dahisar
Charkop-Bandra-Mankhurd
the
planned
to
Mumbai.
line.
The
planned
Kasarvadawali
Monorail
subsumed
this
in
Thane
will
be
revised
ii.
Kasarvadawali
Wadala-
Uran,
5:
to
Fort
Line
Ghatkopar-Thane
Metro
connect
Metro
to
connectivity.
from
Kasarvadavali
to
124
directly right
connection
iii.
Metro
Line:
and
The
planned
Dronagiri
being
125
126
127
128
129
130
(within
Elphinstone
Estate),
and
Land.
exclusive
bus
supplemented
lanes
by
an
BRTS
and
underground
and
the
creation
of
walkable
car-free
when
Bunder
131
the
and
redevelopment
Wadala.
of
However,
DMIC corridor)
line
to
Wadala,
currently
under
consideration.
Map: TR-2.
integrated
participate
in
the
multi-modal
hub
with
proper
transit hubs.
the
and
station
dispersal,
design.
such
Suitable
passenger
132
Navi Mumbai
i.
Line
ii.
iii.
Western
and
Eastern
Suburbs,
iv.
MRVCL
is
considering
the
Prabhadevi
transit hub.
line
could
be
made
possible
connection
between
the
133
area
transit
station
or
stop,
public
transport
systems,
to
be
considered
as
TOD
developments:
i.
134
135
4.7.2
downtown
South
Mumbai.
It
at Orange Gate.
structures
Alternatively,
adjoining
MMRDA
the
road.
is
also
difficult.
regions
Express
Highway,
via
the
the
the
Eastern
Eastern
Express
Highway
at
recently
Sion-Panvel Expressway.
136
waterfront.
Highways.
Princess
and
Docks
Victoria
Road-Barrister
and
Road-Rafi
Madame
Cama
Road
(connecting
colonies.
Meherali
Road
(connecting
St.
Savata
the
Mali
Eastern
Marg
Express
137
CTS
Mumbai
Region:The
Road
Proposals
Metropolitan
for
Study
Comprehensive
Transport
are
proposed,
which
would
on
temporary
basis.
road
MbPT area.
ii.
Elevated
Sewri-Worli
East
construct
an
elevated
East-West
138
as
the
implementing
would
139
140
Map: TR4 Existing and Planned Road Connectivity to the Port Land; Source:
MMRDA
141
142
road
link
is
normally
/ goods vehicles:
development
of
development
or
could
through
an overhead connection.
be
made
possible
significant
attraction.
An
ii.
clover-leaf
diverted
Land,
in the future.
through
the
Port
has
been
Connections
from
the
possible
underground
iii.
well
appropriate
i)
as
so
ensure
143
ii.
iv.
as suggested by MCGM
v.
Connection
across
Dockyard
Internal
order
to
Circle
spacing
adequate
In
road
spacing
ensure
Network:
spacing
Road
as
provide
new
east-west
safety
and
measures
traffic
such
as
management
traffic
signal
laying
of
older
road
surfaces,
144
foothpath
improvements,
parking,
completely
145
146
4.7.3
Proposed
Strategy
Bus
Transit
4.7.3.1 Existing
Services
Bus
Transit
port area.
MTSU/Embarq
MCGM
by
CTSs
the
the
upon
for
Freeway
builds
undertaken
avoiding
Dadar.
4.7.3.2 Planned
Bus
Transit
projects in the Pipeline
Comprehensive
Study
Transport
Bus
Transit
The
metro
line
in
the
Region.
147
improved
and
strengthening
augmented,
connectivity
further
to
Navi
Mumbai.
alignment.
MMRDA.
express
bus
services,
CST,
Churchgate,
Dadar,
148
Map TR6 Planned BRTS Network and Proposed BRTS connecting the Port Land
149
150
4.7.4
Proposed
Strategy
Water
Transit
formally
through
transport.
environment-friendly
water-based
alternative
to
developed
as
Water
MMB.
4.7.4.1 Existing Water Transit
Infrastructure (Details are
shown in map TR7)
Currently
two
sites
offer
water
The
Waterfront, namely:
Ferry
Wharf
Bhaucha
Maharashtra
Maritime
Board
Dhakka:
to security reasons.
state-of-the-art
water-based
mass
151
and
comfortable
passengers.
transport
for
terminals
are
Three
floating
i.
This
to
lands.
connected
owned
jetties
an
152
Wharf
for
embarkation
/
disembarkation.
iii. Helideck
and
Berthing
of
Seaplane: This proposal involves
the development of a helideck and
a seaplane berthing facility at
Backbay close to Nariman Point to
offer alternatives for movement of
personnel to airport and other
destinations. This is in line with the
Government of Maharashtras
intentions to start seaplane
operations along its coastline. This
project
would
involve
the
construction of a landing stretch, a
berthing jetty, and passenger
access ways to the berthing jetty.
iv. Floatel Project in Backbay: This
project involves the mooring
(anchoring) of a Floatel in Backbay
with a view of Queens Necklace
(Marine Drive) from the sea side.
Movement of tourists to this floatel
would be from the jetty proposed
at Giragum Chawpaty for ferry
service to Bandra Reclamation.
tourism
These
and
include
leisure
the
building
to
international
improvement
and
153
154
155
156
opening
up
of
the
Eastern
the City.
the
coast
of
Maharastra,
revamped
and
redecorated
with
in
facilities,
baggage
handling,
Water
commercial vehicles.
long-distance
Transport
Terminals:
inter-city
To
water
157
transport
terminals
be
developing
express
building,
maintenance.
high
need
to
speed
construction
of
drop-off
Possible
sites
could
vehicles,
Bunder
upgradation
of
existing
where
entertainment
recreational
with
services.
land
attractions.
proper
passenger
cultural
and
that area
of
facilities
of
landing,
proper
and
the
social
business
possible
be
make
could
would
activities
and
eating experiences.
destinations
158
159
160
4.7.5
Proposed Non-motorized
Transit Strategy
Network:
As
cultural,
recreational
and
tourist
public presence.
Connector
Currently
Park
Port
Land
its
and developments.
human scale.
161
that
our
physical
challenges.
The
National
Transit
Ropeway:
As a tourist attraction, as well as an
alternative transport mode a ropeway /
cable
car
could
be
developed
MbPT
for
the
development
of
162
attractive
consumption
is
like
(GHG),
planet.
of
the
greenhouse
gasses
Improper
approaches
development
is
environmental
resources
causing
imbalance.
recreational,
huge
Due
tourism,
In
to
the
meantime
assessment
quality,
water
increased
F).
Based
on
these
variousenvironmental
existing
managing
the
preliminary
and
of
observations
methodologies
Environmental
circular
metabolism
over
linear
resources
should
be
the
following:
163
164
Recommendation:
4.9 Comprehensive
Area
wise
development
projects
a)
b)
Inclusive Housing
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Environmental
programs
h)
i)
fort.
j)
Tourist Market
k)
2.
Jackeria Bunder
1.
conservation
Recommendation
sixteenth
and
Department
and
century
of
Sewri
fort
Archaeology
3.
Grain Depot
The
comprehensive
Mazagaon
Sewri
Reclamation
monument
may
be
posterity.
165
e)
of
f)
Public Terminal
g)
h)
Retail market
5.
Ghorupdeo Area
these
structures
without
Unit 4, Unit 5)
Recommendation
a)
be
Cotton Green
b)
c)
Inclusive Housing
d)
Entrepreneurship
Recommendations
a)
g)
Conservation
program
Road Station)
office spaces
Small Scale Industry
augment
environment.
promotion
f)
to
zone
e)
implemented
for
b)
Inclusive Housing
6.
7.
Reclamation
15).
conforming
to
Sewri
the
regeneration
Recommendations
c)
d)
Marina
Recommendations:
e)
Water Sports
a)
f)
Recreations Areas
b)
g)
Public Promenade
c)
h)
Seafood Restaurant
d)
Maritime museum
166
8.
10.
Recommendations
will
a)
b)
Station
area
development
(Masjid Bandar)
Elphinstone Estate
also
c)
Convention Center
d)
Entrepreneurship
promotion
zone
e)
Office Spaces
Recommendation:
f)
a)
g)
Inclusive Housing
b)
h)
Conservation
c)
Fishing Activities
d)
e)
Public Promenade
f)
Retail Market
g)
RO RO Jetties
h)
Seafood Restaurants
i)
Helipad
j)
Marina
9.
11.
of
Ballard Estate
Recommendations
a)
program
heritage precincts
unused/underutilized
b)
c)
Inclusive Housing
program
of
Fort
Conservation
Ballard Pier
a)
d)
RO-RO Jetty
e)
f)
12.
Apollo Estate
An
optimum
conservation
and
167
Recommendations
a)
b)
c)
Public Promenade
d)
reassembled
modern
Seafood Restaurant
f)
Helipad
13.
Jamshedji Bunder
The
area
will
processing
and
consolidated
industrial
fish
and
packing
in
storage,
area.
be
comprehensive
taken
slum
for
Recommendations
area
a)
Conservation
program
of
b)
Recommendations
c)
a)
Marina
d)
b)
e)
Fishing Activity
c)
Restaurants
f)
Floating Hotels
14.
Sassoon Docks
168
Housing
Entertainment,Recreation &
Tourism
Special Projects
Environment
Projects by MbPT
& Govt. agencies
Bio-Remediation
Entrepreneurship promotion zone
Nodal development
Eastern waterfront public promenade
development
City park / Civic plazas
Regional park & garden
Community open spaces
Flamingo observatory/ Wetland Park/Bird
Sanctuary
International Cruise Terminal
Sea world/ Aquarium
Tourism promotion
Cinema and theatre
Cultural Centre
Water sports centre
Marina
Fish/ sea food courts
Slum rehabilitation programs
Create alernative housing opportunities for
existing
Metro ( 4th mass rapid transit corridor)
City
Amenities
Area
Improvement
Infrastructure
169
13
14
15
16
Jamshedji Bunder
17
12
11
10
Elphinstone Estate
Cotton Depot
Special Projects
7.
170
5:
Land
Assembly
171
Possibilities
172
5 Land Assembly
Strategies
the
of
the
long
rationalisation
only
Mumbai city.
the
Mumbai
streamline
the
port
would
port
and
not
towards
is
term
leased
lease
for
industrial
which
is
fully
port.
hectares,
Knob
Titwala,
MbPT,
173
Additional
(Alibaug),
Kalyan
there
are
lands
located
ChowpattyBunder,
and
some
Chairman's
foreshore
leases.
developed.
and
private
agencies.
consider
the
impact
of
promoting
haphazard
piece
meal
and
development.Hence
the
5.1 Land
Methods
run.
Hence
an
Assembly
integrated
of
the
Mumbai
port
and
the
consolidation/aggregation
consultation
incentivisation
be:
rationalisation
streamline
Land
and
174
the
would
port
not
towards
only
a
g)
i)
with
financial
supporting
and
legal
j)
l)
m)
175
use
of
MbPT
lands.
This
and
prioritizing
scattered
nature
of
different
5.2.1
176
and
consolidation
of
space
directly
required
estates
for
proper
Through
or
by
vacant
areas
either
underutilized.
operational
are
For
development
demolition
and
redevelopment
integration
of
existing
through improvements.
plan
either
through
or
structures
examples-cum-proposals
are
given
below:
development.
time
bound
177
locations
development plan.
is
both
necessary
and
port
such
establishments.
Tata
Power
to
government
and
semi
178
below:
commercial
(i)
the
State
users
136.73 hectares.
residential
Command
and
Trading
tenancies is as under.
Subsisting
Leases
66.31
99.86
Fifteen monthly
leases
98.99
Monthly
Tenancy
10.4
Expired leases
22.23
acres
under
Defence
categories
viz,
Subsisting
Leases,
There
1494);
(iv)
are
326
subsisting
leases
179
plan.
community
be
manner.
conflicting
participation
would
are
resolved
by MbPT.
consequence
compromise
need is overlooked.
leases
were
got
proposals
impasse
this
applicable
of
for
courts.
would
need
to
shift
individual
180
Of
course,
MbPT
tenancies
are
of this Report.
MbPT
operational
areas
at
years
current
available
reserved
for
MbPT
infrastructure,
this
space
further
the
developments
approving
on
the
based
plan
of
prevent
sanction
to
the
development
meantime
of
the
181
MbPT
development purposes
land
and
considered
for
Location of Estates:
categorized
into
tenancies
located
purpose
of
new
projects.
The
paragraphs.
best
augmentation
be
considered
through
for
area
washroom
operators.
facilities,
and
so
on.
182
area
equipment
land
at
Govandi
Indias
of
and
Central
Warehousing
Land
10.39
hectare
in
Darukhana
the
residential
By
and
Force
suggestions
Air
made
depot
of
property
5.3 Phasing
Assembly
possession
to the Port.
3. Land at Govandi :
The
in
and
development.
smaller plots of varying sizes, of which
Phase I: 72 hectare of land in the
approximately
Elphinston Estate.
1.5
hectare
is
in
development of Marina.
183
Indira Docks.
site.
coal.
Sewree
Warehouse,
Warehouse
&
New
Old/New
Sewree
Kerosene
redeemed.
184
to
be
decided
consultation
by
with
the
the
port
in
Central
Elphinstone Estate.
farms
companies.
parts
around
the
godown
need
leased
such
to
oil
installations,
of
this
sixty
facilities,
(in
mediation
percent
area
Elphinstone
strategy
of
released
urban
for
the
proposed
design
and
conservation
185
5.4.1
186
187
188
189
190
6 Strategies for
Development
outcome,
creating
an
enabling
sector
management
the
This scenario
initial
skills,
steps
in
innovative
make it happen.
Actors and Actions key to the Development Strategies
Incentives
Regulations
Investments
INSTITUTIONS
Administrative
Structure plan
Infrastructure Shelf of
schemes
BOT/JVS
Priority Projects
Investment Plans
Clear Policies, Procedures
and Rules
One Window Clearances
Transparent on-web
procedures/Tracking
Access to decision makers
Participatory mechanisms.
Public relations/
Communications.
Structure plan
Local Area Plans
Urban Design Guidelines
Structure Plan Guidelines
NOCs
Registration of Tenancies
Design guidelines
Branding guidelines
Financial
Statutory
Bonds
GoI/GoM grants
in aid
Ear marked fund
for projects
Soft loans
GOM Grants
GOI Grants
Subsidies
Training Grants
Tax holidays
Mumbai Port Land
Development Authority
Assistance.
FSI/TDR.
Transfer of land Tenancies.
RBI Restrictions
FDI Rules
Companies Act
Environmental
Land Tenancies
NBC
Supreme Court Judgements
Fire
DCR
Functional Use Zones
Coastal Zone Restrictions
Form based code
191
contexts,
and constraints.
infrastructure
corridors
become
supply,
management
trunk
facilities,
public domains.
common
resources
Urban
conservation.
non-negotiable
structure
be
plans.
will
area
guidelines
become
design
networks
It is of tantamount
solid
and
sewerage
major
outdated
drainage
obsolete,
to
and
major
sensitive
being
plan
scaled.
highly
branding
contextual
arrangements,
activities,
and
as
such
192
consultation
with
the
Central
government. The enabling environment
will
facilitate
public-private
partnershipsin the development of the
Eastern Waterfront.
A well-defined policy to facilitate for
negotiated settlement with the present
tenants/lessees of MbPT land needs to
be spelt out.
Government
Resolution,
to
cooperation
stakeholders
include
from
all
and
and
seek
sectors
and
promote
6.3 Re-development
and
Rejuvenation Policies
6.3.1
Defining
the
Environment
Enabling
193
6.3.2
social objectives.
Broadly
speaking,
this
enabling
land
Plan
Development
and
and
land
use
the
ControlRegulations
proposed
development
Defining Legislations
Development
developments
with
the
development.(Detailed
constraints)
but
will
mechanisms
also
have
to
to
ensure
develop
that
programmes
for
enabling
small
industries by providing:
process.
strengthening
capacity
of
the
existing
194
Define
Development
Control Regulations
and
infrastructure
other
the MPLDA.
6.3.3
capacity
and
land
use
activities,
propertiesdo
parameters
addition,
not
develop
anarchitectural
in
code
a
(for
the
public
spaces,semi-public
Guidelines for
rehabilitation and
conservation of existing
resources
The
programmes
for
195
the
jobs
in
sectors
of
infrastructure
treatment.
6.3.5
Guidelines / Strategies of
Rehabilitation of residential
activities
6.3.7
forward
linkages
industry)and
its
(managing
and
for
for
training
capacity
6.3.8 Along
with
labour
rehabilitation and employment
generation, the MPLDA will set up
programmes
to
develop
capacities of the existing labour
to take up jobs that have emerged
in newer areas due to the
regeneration and re-development
projects like that of special
industries and enterprises. These
programmes
will
include
monitoring
the
capacity
of
existing
labour,
formulating
capacity building exercises from
time totime and monitoring the
impact of the capacity building
exercises.Strategies for dealing
with MbPT tenancies
the
Guidelines
programmes
building
aggregation
development
196
of
land
purposes
occupied
has
by
been
discussed in Chapter 5.
An efficient
development
purposes
has
been
needs to be established.
This would
tenancies
and
for
providing
legal
tenancies
the
large
number
of
outstanding
for
the
same
would
be
The
Joint
between the
MPLDA
joint
of
legal
the
SPA,
number
providing
the
large
and
mechanism
outstanding
would
be
mechanism
MbPT and
vested in it.
197
198
7: Implementation Mechanism
199
200
7 Implementation
Mechanism
There
are
heavy
own
operational
and
requirements,
with
view
its
to
meet
the
looked
the
The
legal
proposed
following are
redevelopment.
some
of
the
into
the
applicable
legal
Notifications,
identified:
7.1.1
Municipal
Corporation
Coastal Regulatory
(CRZ) implications
zone
Constraints
1. As per the current CRZ notification a
majority of the land of MbPT falls
under CRZ I, II, categories under
which no change of land use or FSI
is permitted.
No construction is allowed in CRZ I and
reclamation is not allowed in CRZ II
areas.
Under CRZ II buildings are given
permission without allowing any change
in present and the FSI is capped at of
1991. Also buildings shall only be
Existing Situation
201
Suggestions
Suggestions
7.1.3
of
Shipping
should
frame
comprehensive
Slum
Rehabilitation
Policy.Current
data
on
informal
Constraints
1. The MRandTP act 1966, gives the
power to the local Planning body
for making development plans for
areas under its control.
The MCGM, the local planning body
governs the Land Use in Mumbai city.
All zoning changes need to be ratified
by the MCGM.
Most uses in the MbPT are Industrial
however it is envisaged that future land
uses will be mostly public purposes.
For every change of land use the MbPT
will have to approach the MCGM for
approval. This would delay the process
of redevelopment.
Slum
Rehabilitation
Authority regulations
Constraints
1. There is no current data on the
number of informal settlements on
Mbpt land.
Suggestions
202
Constraints
Restructuring
and
reassigning
of
7.1.6
Constraints:
The MbPT is established under the said
act. Although the act does not debar
development of its land, it does not
Suggestions
specifically
provide
for
any
purposes.
Suggestions
The Act does not contain any restriction
on development of lands under its
control.
203
7.1.7
Cessed Buildings
Constraints
would
lead
to
piecemeal
recommendations
Cessed
for
the
that was .
It is necessary under the present
7.2 Development
Control
Regulations for Greater
Mumbai
2014-2034.
204
205
206
Trusts
Act,
1963
through
Central
seal.
manage
entity
under-developed
landed
though
an
Agreement.On
port-related activities.
7.3.1
facilitate
specific
the
ACT
was
necessary
provision
to
empowering
207
regard
the
the
are
of
the
MR&TP
to
preparation
Development
of
Plansfor
notifiedareas.
However,
Act.
there
Other
mandatory
the
controls
of
Constitution
of
State
India,
legally
notedfunctions
Examples
of
SPAs
formed
sound.
the
Further
relating
it
to
was
Urban
by
sanctions
commercially
Land
exploit
the
Railways
and
permissions
Development
from
Committee
independent
(Amendment)
This
the
developing
for
bestow
Planning
amendment
any
Act,
2005.
inter-alia
any
enabled
railway
powers
to
land
prepare
Special
Authority
Planning
for
any
Bodies.
208
Act,
1963,
enabling
amendment
Central
for
development
the
provision
State
inserting
would
an
also
empowering
Government
make
the
under
the
the
region,
its
and
role
vis--vis
implementation
itself.
and
control
urban
and
economic
designated area.
projects
as
part
of
overall
redevelopment.
7.4.1
below:
review
modern
and
decision-making
approve
the
overall
209
annual
budgets
overall
of
senior
and
decision
the
makers
and
Secretary/Additional
Government of India.
Secretary
to
accomplished
professional.
private
sector
People Policies
private
sector
capabilities
in
its
contracts),
month.
The
Executive
Committee
both
official
and
members.
The
SPA
should
be
allowed
to
office,
&
CEOs
non-official
operations
including
of
experts.
210
cities,
protection etc.)
solar
energy,
environment
and
only
utilized
for
and
development,
salaries
and
existing infrastructure.
decision
making.
The
sources
of
capabilities
including
investment
portfolio
and
(2)
related
development
Infrastructure
charges
development
central
management.
and
Business environment
treasury
and
state
climate
conducive
for
attracting
211
authority
that
can
create
company,
getting
utilities
212
213
214
215
216
8 Strategies for
Project
Implementation
8.1 Strategizing
Project
Implementation through
Phasing
Mumbai
for
decided
consultation
MPLDA itself.
Port
lands
proposed
upfront
by
with the
MbPT
in
Ministry of
proposed
will
Mumbai
Port
Land
require
significant
capital
infrastructure
trunk,
social
and
financially
217
self-sustaining.
In
this
8.2.1
estimated
completion
of
time
the
frame
for
administrative
of
comprehensive
operation
and
maintenance phases.
The phasing of actions required to be
taken for the various activities included
in the vision strategy have also been
enumerated at length. Details of which
may be seen in the chart below.
218
TERMS
MEDIUM
1
ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENTS
1
Assembly of Lands
Resource mobilisation
Implementation of Projects
Livelihood
Projects by
Environm
MbPT & Govt.
ent
agencies
Public open
spaces
Entertainment,Recreation &
Tourism
HOUSING
1
INFRASTRUCTURE
1
Helipad
Road Improvement
AREA IMPROVEMENT
1
CITY AMENITIES
Emergency services
219
LONG
Financial Strategies
Planning
is
8.2.2
and
Designing
Stage
efficiency.
electricity,
220
special
roads,
public
Charges or Bills.
2. Development Charges
These
are
effective
in
case
of
lines,
street
in the endeavour
landscapes,
5. Annuity/Royalty:
etc.
3. Rents
These are effective in case of leased and
8.2.3
form of rents.
public transportation.
include:
Focus
4. Revenue sharing
on
developing
high
quality
221
Economic master-planning
222
account
MPLDA
economics
infrastructure
asset
classes,
of
deep
Resource mobilisation
should
viable
aim
tocreate
surplus
of
environmentally
the
whole.
development,
Each
clusters
operations
Those that will be (almost) fully selfsustaining in its operations through user
charges (e.g. 'public' facilities here user
charges are possible) to ensure access
for thespecial categories, weekly free
entry etc. may be tried.
Those that will require both capital and
operational subsidies - e.g., public
parks, museums etc. It may also be
useful to explore the notion of 'privately
owned public spaces', where private
owned and managed spaces are made
open to the 'public'.
and
relevant
cluster
for
could
be
5%
for
social
20%
for
transport
infrastructure.
clusters ofactivities:
223
this area.
above charges.
Optimal
sequencing:
Approach to phasing of
projects
participation.
will be
implemented
economic
the
and
economic
detailed
master
land
not
but
etc)
enablers
use
planning.
infrastructure investment:
include:
plans subsequently
ensure
development
focus
and
optimize
trunk
infrastructure
related
224
model
Parallelly
initiate
attraction
one
extreme
where
ownership,construction
and
and
MPLDA
relinquishes
upfront
monetary
ownership
for
considerations.
8.2.7
Developer
model
Preference/rejection
rationale
Significant bandwidth
involved
Sizeable team to
Value retained
100%
85-90%
Housing
projects of
DDA in Delhi
70-75%
Many affordable
housing projects
such as Virar
Rental Housing
(MMRDA and
HDIL)
50-60%
TIDCO
Krishnapatnam
SEZ; Mumbai
Metro One Pvt
Ltd
30-40%
Not very
common
in India
Examples
Original EPZs in
India such as
Kandla EPZ; not
very common
contractors/ agencies
Development
agreement
model
bidder
225
developments
8.2.8
Financing of infrastructure
projects
project:
of
Urban
Development),
Projects
(Ministry
Tourism),
capital
from
Infrastructure
Project
of
India
Development
226
related
monetised,
how
to
how
land
contracts
on
involvement.
community
These
can
include:
1. Friends
of
the
Waterfront:
harnessing
the
community's
involvement in the waterfront.
Citizens participate in various
activities at the waterfront, and
help maintain those through an
annual fee /sponsorship. Such
models can be used for operations
and maintenance of infrastructure
such as marinas and boardwalks.
Similar interests can be formed for
other areas as well such as Citizens
for Heritage.
Crowd-sourcingor crowd-funding is the
practice of funding a project by raising
small ticket monetary contributions
from a large number of people, typically
via the internet. These could be for
smaller capital projects such as for
parks, plazas and also for specific
aspects such as paving in a public plaza
etc.
Tax free Development impact Bonds
(also known as Social impact Bonds)
which are earmarked for specific socio-
emphasis
is
are
227
228
8.2.9
Project
financing
Recovery options:
and
Service charges
Corpus, Grants
Rents
Nodal development
Sea world/aquarium
Tourism promotion
Cultural centre
Marina
Rents
Rents
Helipad
Road improvement
Development charges
Development charges
Development charges
Development charges
Development charges
Development charges
Development charges
Development charges
Emergency services
Housing
Special projects
hood
Liveli-
Envrio
Corpus, Grants
& industrial
Bio-remediation
amenities
ment
Infrastructure
Commercial
Commercial
Area
improve-
City
& industrial
-nment
Projects
by MbPT
& govt.
agencies
229
8.2.10 Next
steps
for
the
redevelopment of Mumbai
Port Trust Lands
living
infrastructure
two categories:
requirements
master-plan
that
underpins
the
coming
from
the
development
Step-1:
Institutional
preparation
master-planning
2. Development of a detailed
physical land use plan
integrated
as
part
of
Standard
overall
RFP,
competition,
redevelopment.
Paid
unpaid
planning
planning
competition.
1. Development of an integrated
economic
master-plan
followed
by
a
detailed
physical land use plan
wasteful
in
client/
world-class
and
early
investment
people
oriented
we
recommend
developer
have
good
master-
230
the
plan.
preliminary
planning
concept
3. Procurement
of
top-tier
strategy
consultant
for
strategy
development,
economic
master-planning
and program management
stadiums/
towers/
activities:
business
is an emphasis on design
3 Unpaid planning competition: An
unpaid planning competition process is
similar to a paid planning competition
process except that, the shortlisted
master-planners are not paid to develop
the more detailed concept plans. This
process is best suited for prestigious
projects like iconic structures where
winning competition will raise bidder
profile or where vision/ development
objectives are simple to understand
In both, paid and unpaid planning
competition methods, all the concepts
developed by different competitors are
the proprietary assets of the client and
some or all of which can be used for the
final land use plan. Exhibit-7 below
gives the advantages / disadvantages of
the three methods. The committee
recommends that we follow a paid
competition process for the selection of
the
master-planner
and
the
231
financing
of
equity
participation.
Equally
environment
while
functions
i.e.
planning,
to
transportation
plan
and
implement
the
development
transfer
the
concerned
transportation authorities.
Similarly,
the
programmes
232
O&M
to
implementation
to
the
of
local
these
civic
233
Mechanism/instrument/strategy
Access and
availability
Cost
Time and
buffer to the
payer
Risk to the
financier
Legal
framework and
modalities
Difficult to avail
High since it
encroaches of
local finance
Not an issue
Not an issue
Very easy
Low availability
High since it
encroaches of
local finance
Not an issue
Not an issue
Easy
Low availability
Low
Not an issue
Not an issue
Easy
Low availability
Moderately high,
since it has an
interest
component
Moderate
depending upon
the payback
ability of the
project
Moderate
depending upon
the payback
ability of the
project
Moderately
difficult
Available
Moderately
high, since it
has an interest
component
Moderate
depending upon
the payback
ability of the
project
Moderate
depending upon
the payback
ability of the
project
Moderately
difficult
Available
High since it
encroaches of
local finance
Not an issue
Not an issue
Easy
Available
Low as the
collateral will
exist
Difficult
Available
Low as the
collateral will
exist
Difficult
Available
Not an issue
Not an issue
Not an issue
Difficult
Availbale
Not an issue
Nor an issue
Nor an issue
Very difficult
234
Appendix
235
236
Appendix A: MPLD
committee Terms of
reference
of
Mumbai
Ports
Ports
The
as under:
preparing
road
development
waterfront
of
and
map
for
Mumbai
Port
lands.
transportation
and
promotion
of
strategy
(viii)
Principal
Secretaries,
Urban
for
Development,
re-
Specialinvitees.
(ix)
Chairman-Mumbai
Port
modification
Trust-
to
the
Regulations
Development
Control
for
Greater
Co-opted members:
this area.
the
extent of rehabilitation
237
Activities
involved
in
the
Toassess
broadly
the
funding
238
Appendix B:
Committee
Meetings
of
240
Appendix C: Summary of
public suggestion received
structures,
parks
and
children's
upon.
valuable thoughts.
mapped
the
multiple
facets
of
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
recognizes
each
delineates
the
contributor
categories
and
his/her
features
All
likes
suggestions
received
can
241
be
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id
=0BzCvh0HMG9MZ2hWNFpYRWtOalUandusp=sharing
to
4.
promoting
Swimming pool
Surfing facilities
Water Park
World Class Aquarium
Dolphin show
Oceanarium
Scuba diving
Motor Boats
Para-Sailing
Sailing
Rowing
Water rides
Yacht berthing facilities
Angler's points
Boat tours/ rides (Scope can be
enlarged from the present
Gateway of India to both sides
of South Mumbai.)
16. Floating pools
17. Kayaking
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
242
243
Cruise Tourism
cruise vessel.
the
nationals,
Europeans,
South
Japanese,
Koreans
US
and
seamen,
on
foreign
ships;
at
Fujairah/Colombo
anchorage;
244
crewing.
Customs Procedures
Rs.15
Goa/Mumbai Ports.
day
visits
to
par
with
difference
foreign
being
ports
subsided
with
the
to
the
the time.
of Tourism.
Cabotage Waiver
Currently
foreign
Mumbai
cannot
- Bunkering
vessels
calling
embark
Indian
for
on
lakhs
vessels.
Allowing
Indian
fuel.
- Lakshadweep
tourism.
native
population
are
allowed
to
245
while
small
Islets
are
given
for
for
an
Lakshadweep
Indian
Arthur Bunder
enter
line
grossly
we
to
need inner
inadequate.
Vessels
calling
calling
vegetarian meals.
at
Lakshadweep.
Officials
for
on-arrival
clearance
Entertainment district
in
Infill plaza
Interpretive displays
Nightlife district
in
relevant
PORT OPERATIONS
cruise
conferences is important.
better utilized
Other Suggestions
Cable car
Sea casinos
JNPT/NSICT)
Malls
requirement).
Organized markets
or
towards
Palghar
Children's entertainment
Amusement Park
follows:
Drive in Theatre
Ferris Wheel: Eg. The London Eye
shops/restaurants/transport
Floating hotel
246
Other Suggestions
Mazagaon
docks
should
be
created.
importing/exporting
physical
goods
nearby.
areas,
the
space requirements.
This
will
ports
facilitate
cargo
and
handling
expedite
for
railway authorities.
developing
1)
infrastructure/office
world
space
247
The
ongoing
projects
as
station,
cement
development
of
such
area.
gas
through
the
city's
pipe
line
connections.
WH.
shifted here.
be
offered
to
the
Air
Force.
Colaba.
Provide
space
another
Mazagoan
Docks
for
Ltd
(MDL)
248
Playgrounds
should be discarded.
OPEN SPACES
sufficient parking.
proper
U.S.A
with
collection
Bird
gardens
Zoos,
Public
Nature
preserves
zoo
- Petting zoo
Butterfly park
or inconvenience to anybody.
Pier gardens
Botanical Garden
Flower Gardens
249
- Multi-flower
various varieties
varieties out of 75
- Orchid garden
- Rose garden
region
Areas
for
Mass
the surroundings
festivals.
Boardwalks
western
Other Suggestions
Promenades
recreation,
sports,
community
250
and mangroves
Race course
harbour
allowed
Redevelop
existing
commercial
buildings
Government
government
buildings
residential
has
been
promoting
palm trees
251
affordable
Rehabilitation
housing
project
Slum
etc.
Slum
dwellers
deserve
basic
Entities discouraged
to
the
builders
for
to
generate
Activity
HOUSING
Affordable housing
Affordable
housing
for
Tenants' Rights
Student Dormitories
should be given to
The
redevelopment
shall
be
Teacher's hostels
252
Rental Housing
Studio Apartments
Employees/Officers
and
tenant/
(serving
of
lease
hold
properties.
in the city.
employees.
Mbpt.
co-operative basis.
Other Housing
World
Class
Residential
and
Commercial Towers
253
population.
Maharashtra's coastline.
only
corporate
and
government
not sufficient
eastern
seafront
ferry
Bunder.
Terminals
at
Vashi,
CBD
a well-connected network.
Jetties
the
well-defined
On
proper
capacity
waiting
rooms,
toilets,
parameters.
Water Transport
space
for
beautification
waterfront.
Stress on public transportation is
Marinas
an
express
- Multiple marinas
ferry
with,
254
of
that
Princess
Docks
by
providing
side.
of India
up
rather
than
individual
problems
Bunder
cars
allowing
that
(Ex:
lots
create
Sentosa
of
traffic
Island,
connectivity.
vessels
passenger
residence)
and
small
commercial
vehicles.
Tram Connectivity
congestion.
255
adjacent
(Sewri/Wadala/CottonGreen/Reay
road.
to
the
development
conjunction
needs
or
with
with
Central
the
Railways'
trans-harbour
Rail Connectivity
Metro Connectivity
Underground metro
Helipad
Helipad on ground
Floating Helipad
Other Suggestions
256
hazard.
walking and
place.
Proper
arrangements
access
to
for
residential
jurisdiction.
management
toilets
defecating in open.
to
prevent
people
from
to
the
existing
and
multi-stakeholder
communication
provided
blocks
development.
on
pavements
should
be
257
for
control
equipment;
in
the
room
in
landing
proposed
roads
People
gather
near
to
for
taxis;
parking
for
self-driven
important
leading
the
pavements
and
been
can be created.
the
importance
of
the
modal
transit
locations.
Other
Suggestions
Ample parking
258
due
to
shallow
still
waters;
ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION
the
Energy Generation and Conservation
support
of
concrete
pylons
Wind Energy
Solar Energy
Bio Gas
Hydroelectricity
neutralizing
toxicity
hazards
of
areas.
Nature Conservation
exist.
monitor
and
recommend
remedial
259
form habit.
transport.
The
entire
compost
health issues
waterproof).
Institute
and
Narayana
Nethralaya
implemented
entire area.
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Hospitals
(General/
Research
"Health City."
and
Teaching Facilities)
260
money.
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
MISCELLANEOUS
- K-12 schools
School of Governance
Maritime
Waste
Indian
integrated
Development
Management
Plan
of
with
the
Mumbai
to
Institute
be
vast land
Institute
of
Maritime
Maritime Activities
Oceanography
No Commercial Development
No
commercial
Corporate
offices,
complexes
Malls,
(i.e.
Theaters,
public
opportunities.
Thus,
having
skill-
shifts
based
on
services
and
small
utility
the
261
worked
successfully
because
they
submitting suggestions
formed
for
Operations
and
Maintenance of redeveloped
-public
furniture)
space
(landscaping,
street
-public utilities
ferries)
-recreational amenities
-the
financial
and
organizational
to the area
should function.
Major government
MbPT land.
port
estates.
They
departments,
had
museums.
262
Guggenheim study
A
few
years
BMW
renowned
architects
the
and
urban
efforts.
20 years.
online
travel
websites
and
social
Land as Commons
become
future
groups.
role
model
for
college
education,
awareness
programs
public
health
and
disaster
263
parks
required
by
the
additional
use.
Formulation
and
Implementation
Building
above.
Code
Prevent
further
special
security
forces
should
be
264
same
and
building
typology
architecture
urban
design
structure
plan
and
desired.
Use of area
Mumbaikars
them
from
followed
per
nominal
thus
charging
City
by
the
The
areas
the land.
street furniture
distance)
265
Determine
the
shortfall
from
port.
Durability
project.
waterfront
to
generate
revenues.
seepage
and
dampness
and
its
maintenance,
repairs
and
for
replacement in future.
activities.
it.
exploitation.
266
Follow
the
book
'Durability
very high.
there
has
to
be
one
legal
fraternity
and
267
5.3.2.
Additionally, MMRDA have shared their
as
the
Mumbai
Port
vision
relating
transportation
Land
to
land
and
based
connectivity
been
Document.
stages
of
processing
and
the
region
and
providing
268
incorporated
in
the
Vision
sSL
PROPOSAL
No.
1
Implementing
Nature (Leisure-L/Transport-T)
Agency
International Cruise Terminal by upgrading existing
MbPT
Leisure
Cruise Terminal
2
MbPT
Leisure
MbPT
Leisure
MbPT
Leisure
Floatel
MbPT
Leisure
MbPT
Leisure
MMB
Transportation
MMB
Leisure
MMB
Transportation
Reclamation
10
MMB
Transportation
11
MTDC
Leisure
12
MTDC
Leisure
13
MSRDC
Transportation
MSRDC
Transportation
15
MMRDA
Transportation
16
MMRDA
Transportation
269
270
consultant
has
suggested
improvements
Project location
BPX Terminal, Mumbai Port.
visit
Mumbai/India.
terminal
needs
to
of
not
furnishing
do
in
mainly
The
be
handling area.
existing
in 2011.
with
change
of
lighting
and
air-
system,
conditioner.
The
building
Project Profile:
objection.
Interior decoration of
were
Special permissions
required/Constraints in project
implementation
Permission is required from (i) Ministry
of Shipping, GOI, (ii) MbPT Board
suggested
improvements
for
271
MbPT.
Consultant
envisaged
size
of
London
Nariman
Point
with
facilities
Eye.
Consultant
has
like
Special permissions
Permission
is
required
from
(i)
Project Profile
part
of
cruise
terminal
managing authority:
lines
PPP/BOT operator.
of
London
Eye
in
U.K.
Method of implementation:
PPP Mode
implementation:
implementation
finalized.
schedule
can
be
3. Development of Marina at
Jamshedji Bunder
As part of international cruise terminal,
breakwater.
272
Project Profile:
100 words)
As
part
of
cruise
terminal
Office space
Ramchandani Marg
vessels
falling
in
flying
path
of
Special permissions
required/Constraints in project
Oyster Rock.
Ministry
market),
terminal
accommodation,
building,
hotel
of
Defence,
GOI,
(iv)
office
complex,
managing authority:
Project location:
Near Oyster Rock, Mumbai Port.
Method of implementation:
PPP / BOT basis
implementation:
Five years
pile
structure
to
have
proposed
Proposed
Plan/Section/Drawing/Image/Map
level)
Marina off Princes and Victoria Docks
273
Cruises,
Floating
Restaurant,
disposal etc.
PMC.
MbPT
Board
Special
approved
permissions
required
Constructions
implementation:
enterprise)
marina
Reception,
as
PMC.
Lounge,
The
Cafeteria,
Bar,
in
project
Management
Mumbai
Authority
(MCGM),
(MCZMA),
Maharashtra
managing authority:
Land area required:
274
Project Proponent
Method of implementation:
Will be decided by the Project
Project cost:
cost
proponent
must
adhere
to
or
of
ship
and
other
allied
improve.
implementation:
The PP has to develop the facilities
lease.
Floatel and Floating Restaurant
FLOATEL
A cruise ship to anchor and operate as
FLOATEL.
Trust
for
no. 2
leisure/entertainment/hospitality
fair weather
promotion.
nearest
anchorage
C-2
off
the
ship
along
with
Project location:
C-2 Anchorage and Ferry Wharf No. 2
(Location map enclosed)
Land area required: (in Hectare) :
275
Floating Restaurant
Special
permissions
required
Project location :
managing authority:
model
basis.
Method of implementation:
on
annual
lease
be developed by MTDC.
upon.
Salient features / Project highlights:
Proposed time frame and phases for
implementation:
lease.
Seaplane
MTDC proposed that they through M/s.
MEHAIR (Maritime Energy Heli Air
Services P. Ltd) will operate seaplane
year
To operate Sea Plane from Juhu to
Marina Bay.
10 seater plane.
276
Project Profile:
Gateway of India is the embarkation /
disembarkation point for passengers
including tourists from boats plying to
Mandwa, Elephanta Island, Navi
Mumbai and Harbour cruise. Gateway
area is under the administrative control
of Mumbai Port Trust (MbPT).
Regulation of passenger traffic at
Gateway of India is undertaken by MMB
staff. MMB has posted one Port
Inspector and one Chowkidar for this
purpose. Approx. 26 lakhs passengers
including tourists embark/disembark
annually from the five existing jetties
from Gateway of India. The traditional
means of embarkation/ disembarkation
from the stone steps and slipways (05
existing jetties) at Gateway of India are
considered to be inefficient and unsafe.
The passengers, which include ladies,
children and old people, have to cross
number of boats (4 to 5) before getting
into their boat, which can be seen from
the
photographs
below.
MMB
attempted to install two pre-cast
concrete floating jetties at Gateway of
India, which were objected to by the
Indian Navy due to security reasons.
MMB has now identified a new location
for passenger jetty with associated
facilities near Radio Club in consultation
with Indian Navy, Traffic Police and
MbPT.
Passenger Terminal.
Concessional charges for floating
pontoons and nominal charges for
landing and takeoff.
Special
permissions
Constructions
required
in
project
MTDC to develop
map, if any):
277
provided.
Special
platform
on
stilts
abutting
the
permissions
required
/ Project status:
progress.
Preparation of Detailed Project Report
in progress.
Proposal
weather only)
clearance on 2.7.2014
submitted
for
MCZMA
managing authority:
contact/agreement.
Arrangement)
Method of implementation/Funding:
Passenger
Terminal
with
basic
Approvals
Security
checks
The
security
for
Archaeological
including
278
environmental
clearance;
Project Profile:
own fund.
implementation:
phases.
been
st
identified
in
Backbay
area.
weather operation.
jetty
nd
for
embarking/disembarking
berthing jetty.
tranquil
due
to
the
breakwater.
map, if any):
Commencement
of
construction
st
Nariman Point.
st
facility
and
berthing
of
approach
provided
from
Approx. 15 crores
constructed
be
jetty
can
from
Nariman
point
embarking/disembarking
279
Mumbai
from
Nariman
Point
to
/ Project status:
infrastructure
operation.
MbPT permission
State
permissions
Govt.
required
permission
(various
facility
consisting
of
Department)
case
Project Profile:
managing authority:
(O and M) contact/agreement.
Method of implementation/Funding
Project,
which
will
undertake
all
of
passenger
services
from
activities.
infrastructure
implementation:
Six
months
after
receiving
all
facility
consisting
of
permissions.
to Bandra Reclamation.
case
of
passenger
services
from
map, if any):
280
Method of implementation/Funding:
Project,
which
will
undertake
all
Approx 15 crores
At Girgaum:
implementation:
Six
Passenger
amenities
like
toilets,
At Bandra Reclamation:
toilets,
lifesaving arrangements
Security arrangements
Konkan
to
the
/ Project status:
MbPT permission
MCZMA clearance
approval
hospitality
passenger/tourists.
Board
all
permissions
of
Security arrangements
Special
receipt
lifesaving arrangements
amenities
after
permissions.
Passenger
months
from
Maharashtra
Maritime Board
managing authority:
281
Six
months
permissions.
after
receipt
of
all
Proposed by MAHARASHTRA
TOURISM
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LTD (MTDC)
Similarly
disembarkation, the
Highlights
Konkan hospitality.
under
Large
Revenue
Generating
Scheme.
Special
permissions
required
Project Profile:
/ Project status:
MbPT permission
Board
approval
from
Maharashtra
Maritime Board
Boatbuilding
operator.
Method of implementation/Funding:
Project,
all
SPV partners.
fallout
implementation:
development.
which
will
undertake
282
of
and
servicing
marine
is
an
infrastructure
sea
existing.
and
subsequently
allows
for
change
the
ambience
of
any
neighbourhood. If Mumbai is to be
Special
permissions
required
Permission
from
Coastal
Zone
Management Authority.
Project Cost:Rs. 280 Crore. (approx.)
following reasons:
Tourist Friendly Location.
Method of implementation :
No
Defense
or
security
critical
development
implementation:
locations.
permissions.
Converting
Village
Fishermens
Based
Tourism
colony
in
Sewree
Experience
Fort
and
promenade
development
Place.
283
ecology
enthusiast,
including
284
Appendix E: Performance
Indicator of Mumbai Port
Trust
285
characteristics.
Appendix F: Environmental
issues and suggested
solutions preliminary
observations
F.1 Description of Natural and
Manmade Environmental Features
The Eastern Coast environment features
can be broadly categorised into coastal
edge, landmarks which include natural
and man-made areas, connectors and
d) Zones:
The coastal edge, landmarks and the
accommodated
within
the
port
Cross Island.
b) Landmarks:
Environmental features have influenced
Colaba.
above
natural
and
man-made
286
Figure F-8Natural Areas, Open Spaces, Primary Activities & Heritage AssetsSource: MbPT, MTSU
287
F.1.1
Natural
Environmental
Features
a) Bio-diverse areas
The 5.74 km long Mahul River is a
b) Mudflats
The coastal wetlands formed due to
nutrient
image 4-1.
chemistry.
Mudflats
are
to be preserved.
characterized
by
gentle
sloping
c) Mangroves
288
roads
practices.
F.1.2
saline
levels,
Dhakka.
Purple
Jetties
were
Protruding
Environmental
a) Coastal Edges
Mumbai Port was constructed at its
conditions,
Gull,
Man-made
features
the
anaerobic
of
low
part
to
vital
Due
fish.
are
Heron,
289
ornamental,
herbal
and
medicinal
land.
change,
ecosystem.
affecting
the
natural
Bharat
Petroleum
Co.
Ltd.
and
290
291
Transportation
of
goods
and
these sources.
3. Transportation
292
deterioration
of
the
biodiversity.
9. Construction waste
The construction industry poses a big
threat to the natural edges as debris
from construction activities is dumped
at
the
mangroves.
coastal
With
edges
the
including
increase
in
293
Figure F-9Environmental issues due to Port and non-Port related activities Source
MTSU, MbPT
294
rational
(GHG)
exceeds
climate
(Oliveira,
2009)
land
use
and
common
change.
fact
finding
a) Impact on Air:
of
population,
their
sheer
centralized
size
of
facilities,
295
cause
major
environmental
and
human
health
runoff
pollutants
environment,
human health.
during
monsoons.
cause
damage
plants,
These
to
the
animals
and
c) Impact on Water
happens
due
to
poor
waste
conductivity,
eutrophication.
pathogens
temperature,
High
may
and
levels
result
of
from
and
the
petroleum
hydrocarbons,
b) Impact on Land
occurring
fauna
chemicals
industrial
used
in
the
of
some
have
natural
a
and
while
can
substances
water
296
solutions.
F.3
Mitigation
Strategies
and
for
Adaptation
the
and
Eastern
ecologically
exact
sustainable
and
change
mitigation
After
front,
Bunders.
Waterfront
an
all
for
on
better
such
as
phyto-extraction,
transformation,
in place.
phyto-
phyto-stabilization,
be
proposed.
Some
of
the
bio-
F.3.1
Identification
and
process.
Activities
and
Urbanisation
appropriate
EIA
Environment
along
with
meet
297
construction
waste
and Fauna
dismantling
clay
recyclers
being
percolations which
the
The
Appropriate
and
sustainable
construction
waste
management
and
demolishing
haulers
environmental
after
impact.
the
3. Sewage Waste
The current practice at some places of
management
water-front.
plan
should
The
include
eastern
harmful to the
and chemical
F.3.3
Protection
Vegetation / Trees
of
existing
2009.
298
fauna.
F.3.4
Storm
Management
Water
for
Drainage
existing
(SWD)
Further
studies
through
geo-
appropriate size.
to
chronic
flooding.Proper
Plan (CZMP):
same.
sustainable
connected
at
certain
places.
The
299
development
to
The
following
environmental
Urban
Waterfront Development.
mitigate
the
emissions.
impact
Vegetation
Island
Effect
(UHIE).
1. Biodiversity management
A dedicated Urban Forest
Heat
will help
of
carbon
covers
demand.
help
measurable
monitoring stations.
records
of
the
surfaces
with
different
thermal
Cover
areas,
infrastructure
while
buildings
increase
and
surface
heat
loss
be
and
installed
at intervals
so
that
evapotranspiration.
the aquifers.
sprawls.
transportation by vehicles.
neighbourhood levels.
300
prevent urban
management
be
developed
at
multiple
water needs.
level
proposal
for
be proposed comprising
green/blue
ecological
belts
to
promote
activities
The
ground
level
of
the
sustainable.
along
the
storm
water
3. Water Management
301
Figure 11Location of Storm Water outfalls.Source Chitale Fact Finding Committee Report
302
303
Appendix G Abbreviations
ALM
BEST
BIPV
BPCL
CBO
CIDCO
CPCB
CR
CRIT
CRZ
CWC
DCR
DP
DWT
ECBC
EIA
EMP
FCI
FSI
FAR
GAIL
GHG
GIS
GIS
GoI
GoM
HMVs
HPCL
ICD
IPCC
LED
MbPT
MCGM
MHADA
MMRDA
MOEF
MoS
MoUD
MPCB
304
MPLDA
MPLDC
MRTP
MSRDC
NGO
NOX
OGPD
PPE
PPP
PSU
RCA
RRZ
SO
SOX
SPA
SPM
SRA
SRI
SWD
SWM
TDR
TOR
UDRI
UHIE
ULCA
UV
MPT
ELU
JICA
DFI
305
Appendix H Bibliography
306