Sei sulla pagina 1di 68

Preparing Research Manuscripts for

Impact Factor Journal


Dr. T. Joseph Sahaya Anand
Department of Engineering Materials
Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Email: anand@utem.edu.my
Tel.: + 60 6 331 6489
016 412 7232

For
FTMKs Colloquium & Seminar
19 March 2014
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Dr. TJS Anand

Introduction

Table of Contents

Part I: Publication & Peer Review


Deciding to Publish
Submitting Your Paper
Part II: Writing a Scientific Manuscript
The Scientific Manuscript
The Abstract
The Introduction
The Methods & Materials Section
The Results Section
The Discussion Section
Figures, Tables, Equations, and References
Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


There is no way to get experience except
through experience.
Publication & Peer Review
What to publish?
abstract vs. full report
Choosing your forum
Which type of journal is best for you?
What audience are you targeting?
Research the journal
Publication guidelines
Article style
Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction

Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Publication in Science Global View
Approximately
regularly

40,000

journals

published

20,000 of them are ISI or Scopus indexed


Total number of papers published annually
exceeds 2.5 million
Google Scholar has almost to taken over the
world bibliometry.

Over 70% are never cited by any one


Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Publication in Science Global View
Articles published (1665-2012)= 54 million
Free and paid abstracts available Scopus, ISI Web of
Knowledge (WoK), PubMed Central, and Google
Scholar
PubMed Central holds over 2.5 million articles, has a
collection of over 21 million citations
SciVerse Scopus holds over 47 million records, it
includes 21,000 peer-reviewed journals (including
1,850 open access journals), 700 trade publications,
and 450 book series.
Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Publication vs. Researcher

1. I love to do research

2. I have no choice
3. I hate to do research

Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Publication
How information is communicated among
scholars and to potential users
Research is not complete until it is published

Provides accountability, which is the basis of


trust
From one author to many

Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Publication - Deciding Whether (or When) to Publish
Some factors to consider: quality of the work,
extent of the work, interest to others
Suggestions:
Seek guidance in this regard from others in
your field who are more experienced in
publishing journal articles - Supervisor.
Present your work orally first. Doing so can
help in deciding whether the work is
publishable and in shaping the paper.
Dr. TJS Anand

Building the Writing Habit


The same time.

The same place.


Carry a notebook
Get rid of rid of negative thoughts.

Sit alone in silence.


Ideas, not grammar, for the first draft. Rewrite.

Dr. TJS Anand

10

Key to Writing Skills

The path to writing well is to read excellent


writers and write.and writeand write.

Free write your thoughts. Dont worry about


structure initially.

Use the best paper in your field as a template


and try to convert your free write-up into a
format.

Keep writing concise, dynamic and simple in


construction.

Convey enthusiasm in your writing so it attract


the audience.
Dr. TJS Anand

11

Select the best journal for submission

Look at your references these will help you


narrow your choices.

Review recent publications in each candidate


journal. Find out the hot topics, the accepted
types of articles, etc.

Ask yourself the following questions:


Is the journal peer-reviewed?
Who is this journals audience?
What is the average time to print?
What is the journals Impact Factor?

Decide on one journal. DO NOT submit to multiple


journals.
Dr. TJS Anand

12

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Identifying a Target Journal
Decide early (before drafting the paper).
Do not write the paper and then look for a
journal. (Why?)

Look for journals that have published work


similar to yours.
Consider journals that have published work
you cite.

Dr. TJS Anand

13

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Some Factors to Consider

Audience Researchers, Educators


Prestige Relevant in the field
Access Open Access
Impact Journal value
Publication time
Quality of reproduction
Likelihood of acceptance

Dr. TJS Anand

14

Research Manuscript - Introduction


What makes a good research paper?

Good writing

Publication in good journals

Great science when written poorly can be a good


paper or alternatively, average science when
written well can be a good paper.

On the other hand, great science when written


well can be an excellent paper and average
science when written poorly can be the readily
rejected paper.
Dr. TJS Anand

15

Publishing in High Impact Journals-Its


the idea which matters

Dr. TJS Anand

16

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Excuses for not publishing.

Fear of judgement / rejection.


I cant write.
I dont know where to start.
Need for perfection.
I dont have enough time.
Lack of Confidence

Fear of public scrutiny


Unsure whether have the skill

Caution work has a use by date.


Dr. TJS Anand

17

Research Manuscript - Introduction


The Seven Deadly Sins

1. Data manipulation, falsification


2. Duplicate manuscripts
3. Redundant publication
4. Plagiarism
5. Author conflicts of interest
6. Animal use concerns
7. Humans use concerns
Dr. TJS Anand

18

Dr. TJS Anand

19

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Creativity
Open mind
Curiosity

Patience
Persistence
Positive Attitude
Discipline and focus

Dr. TJS Anand

20

Research Manuscript - Introduction


What constitutes good Research?
Novel new and not resembling something formerly
known or used (can be novel but not important)
Mechanistic testing a hypothesis - determining the
fundamental processes involved in or responsible for
an action, reaction, or other natural phenomenon
Descriptive describes how are things are but does
not test how things work hypotheses are not
tested.
Dr. TJS Anand

21

Research Manuscript - Introduction


What constitutes good journal?
Who do I want to reach?
Less important than it used to be
Which journals have previously published work in
this area
Review your citations
Maybe too much work in this area?
Which journals have a style or message that is
consistent with yours?
Impact factors

Dr. TJS Anand

22

Research Manuscript - Introduction


What constitutes good journal?

Impact factor

average number of times published papers


are cited up to two years after publication.
Citation Index

average number of times published papers


are cited up to two years after publication.

Dr. TJS Anand

23

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Impact factor
A measure of the frequency with which the "average
article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year
or period. The annual JCR impact factor is a ratio
between citations and recent citable items published.
Thus, the impact factor of a journal is calculated by
dividing the number of current year citations to the
source items published in that journal during the
previous two years.
Impact Factor =

no. of citations

total no. articles


calculated over the last 2 years
Dr. TJS Anand

24

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Impact factor
Calculation for journal impact factor.
A= total cites in 2012
B= 2012 cites to articles published in 2010-11 (subset of A)
C= number of articles published in 2010-11
D= B/C = 2012 impact factor

The impact factor eliminates some of the bias of such


counts which favor large journals over small ones, or
frequently issued journals over less frequently issued
ones, and of older journals over newer ones.
25
Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


2012 Impact Factors are available at various sites;
newer impact factors are copyright-protected

Drawbacks of impact factors:


Review articles are cited more than original
research
Number of citations does not measure quality,
just exposure
The nature of results in different research areas
yield different amounts of publications at
different paces. Generally, medical journals
have higher impact factors than mathematical
journals.
26
Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript - Introduction


Rank
1
2
4
5
6
7
9
10
13
14
15

Abbreviated Journal Title


ANNU REV IMMUNOL
CA-CANCER J CLIN
NAT REV CANCER
PHYSIOL REV
NAT REV MOL CELL BIO
REV MOD PHYS
NATURE
SCIENCE
CELL
NAT IMMUNOL
JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC

IF (2012)
52.431
44.515
36.557
33.918
33.170
32.771
32.182
31.853
28.389
27.586
24.831
27

Dr. TJS Anand

Research Manuscript
Reasons of Rejection
So what factor - fails to communicate a sense of
purpose and how it extends the boundaries of
knowledge
Material is inappropriate for the journal
Work is fundamentally flawed
Work is unintelligible

Dr. TJS Anand

28

Reasons for major revision or rejection of journal papers


Faulty methodology
Inadequate references
Poor quality supporting figures

7%

Outside the scope of journal


Not enough contribution to field

7%

4%
9%

16%

Authors did not follow manuscript instructions

Poor writing style and use of English

7%

2%

Title not representative of study


Subject of little novel interest or not generally
applicable

Poorly written discussion

8%
English Errors
27%

13%

29
Dr. TJS Anand

Manuscript - Get rejected


When rejected, try again
Even Nobel Laureates get rejection letters.
You may need to play ping pong with the
paper. Submit the paper to another journal
within one month.

You do not have to revise a paper every time it


is rejected. But if a paper is rejected 4 times,
there is a serious flaw in the paper. Find and fix
the problem.
Why? The same referee might get it again.

Dr. TJS Anand

30

What is Peer Review Process?


Exciting the reviewers
mind is far more
important
then
exciting the readers
mind.
It is likely that no one
will ever read your
paper more thoroughly
than the reviewer.
Suggest referees that
appreciate your work
(political)

www.weirdscience.ca

Dr. TJS Anand

31

Research Manuscript
A scientific paper tells a story!!

We need a problem or something to


catch the readers attention
We need a plot / results
We need resolution of the problem at the
end of the story.

Dr. TJS Anand

32

Research Manuscript
Attributes of the best papers

Resolve a controversy
Separate Results and Discussion sections
Discussion with sub-headings as questions
Introduction builds to central questions
All roads lead to central question
Hypotheses / research questions crystal
clear and results flow from these questions

Dr. TJS Anand

33

Research Manuscript
Paper Structure and relative level of writing difficulty

Title (difficult)
Abstract (difficult)
Introduction (Most difficult)
Study Area or Background (easy)
Methods (easy)
Results (easy - just the facts)
Discussion (Second-most difficult)
Conclusions (easy)

Dr. TJS Anand

34

Research Manuscript Structure


*

Abstract

* Introduction
* Body of Article / Methodology
* Results

* Discussion and Conclusions


* Acknowledgements
* References

* Figures and Tables

Dr. TJS Anand

35

Research Manuscript Structure


Abstract

Summary of Manuscript (200-300 Words)


Problem investigated
Purpose of Research
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Common Mistake : Prepare abstract at the beginning
of the manuscript writing
Dr. TJS Anand

36

Research Manuscript Structure


Abstract - Common Mistakes

Prepare abstract at the beginning of the


manuscript writing.
Too much background or methods information
Figures or images
References to other literature, figures or images
Abbreviations or acronyms

Dr. TJS Anand

37

Research Manuscript Structure


Introduction Explains the problem

* Broad information on topic


Previous research
* Narrower background information
Need for study
* Focus of paper
Hypothesis
* Summary of problem (selling point)
* Overall 300-500 words

Dr. TJS Anand

38

Research Manuscript Structure


The introduction should also contain a section
describing why this work was done and its
importance.
This is often omitted because the authors assume
that it must be inherently obvious.
Some readers may understand the implied
importance, but many will not.
These statements may also catch the attention
of those who focus more on applications and
potential rather than techniques.
Introduction in the research manuscript is also
includes literature review in any technical report.
Dr. TJS Anand

39

Research Manuscript Structure


Introduction as an inverted pyramid
Status Quo
# of references
increases

Whats wrong with the


status quo

Very general
References

Why this is a problem


How you intend to fix it
Specific Objectives

Dr. TJS Anand

Very specific
references

40

Research Manuscript Structure


Introduction - Common Mistakes
#
#
#
#
#

Too much or not enough information


Unclear purpose
Lists
Confusing structure
First-Person anecdotes

Dr. TJS Anand

41

Research Manuscript Structure


Methodology
Provides instruction on exactly how to repeat experiment

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Subjects / Field of study


Sample preparation techniques
Sample origins
Field site description
Data collection protocol
Data analysis techniques
Any computer programs used
Description of equipment and its use
Dr. TJS Anand

42

Research Manuscript Structure


The descriptions of the experiment must be
clear enough so that they can be readily
replicated.
This is much better if it is done without going
through several other references to get the
gist.

Dr. TJS Anand

43

Material and Methods


Write the methods section first because it is the
easiest to write.
Start writing when experiments still in progress
Sufficient information must be provided for
reproducibility
Animal, human, protections details
Measurements/ instruments
Statistical analysis
Data collection
Descriptive subheadings general experimental
methods, animals, spectral data, etc
Dr. TJS Anand

44

You are not expected to do it..

http://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english-communication-for-scientists-14053993/writingscientific-papers-14239285
Dr. TJS Anand

45

Research Manuscript Structure


Methodology - Common Mistakes
Too little information

Information from Introduction


Results/ sources of error reported

Explaining experimental difficulties

Dr. TJS Anand

46

Research Manuscript Structure


Results
* Objective presentation of experiment results
Summary of data
*

NOT a Discussion!

Results - Common Mistakes


*
*
*
*
*

Raw data
Redundancy
Discussion and interpretation of data
No figures or tables
Methods/materials reported
Dr. TJS Anand

47

Research Manuscript Structure


Discussion Presents the WHY and HOW story
* Interpret results
Did the study confirm/deny the hypothesis?
If not, did the results provide an alternative
hypothesis? What interpretation can be made?
Do results agree with other research? Sources of
error/anomalous data?
Implications of study for field
Suggestions for improvement and future research?

* Relate to previous research

Dr. TJS Anand

48

Research Manuscript Structure


Discussion - Common Mistakes
*
*
*
*
*
*

Combined with Results


New results discussed
Broad statements
Incorrectly discussing inconclusive results
Ambiguous data sources
Missing information

Dr. TJS Anand

49

Research Manuscript Structure


Figures and Tables
Tables
Presents lists of numbers/ text in columns
Figures
Visual representation of results or illustration
of concepts/methods (graphs, images,
diagrams, etc.)
Captions
Must be stand-alone

Dr. TJS Anand

50

Research Manuscript Structure


Figures and Tables
The selection of illustrations, tables, and graphs
are not just to present the data and apparatus
described.
Too many or too few illustrations can greatly
weaken a paper.
On one hand, too few leave details as
ambiguous. On the other, too many can be
redundant, distracting, and divert the attention
of the reader to the main points.

Dr. TJS Anand

51

Research Manuscript Structure


Guidelines for Figures and Tables

High resolution
Neat, legible labels
Simple
Clearly formatted
Indicate error
Detailed captions

Dr. TJS Anand

52

Research Manuscript Structure


Acknowledgements
One area that many authors overlook or give only
minor attention to is the acknowledgements.
Although the people and organizations included
there do not affect the readability of the
manuscript, many authors have made grievous
errors of omission in their acknowledgements.
Leaving out someone who has aided through key
ideas, review of the manuscript, etc. etc. can lead
to injured feelings.
Subsequent assistance may not be so readily
forthcoming.
Dr. TJS Anand

53

Research Manuscript Structure


References
Check specific referencing style of journal
Should reference:
Peer-reviewed journal articles, abstracts, books
Should not reference:
Non-peer-reviewed
works,
textbooks,
communications
Common Mistakes
Format, Format, Format
(Figures & Tables, Equations, and References)
Redundant Information
Text, Figures, Tables, and Captions
Type of Reference
Dr. TJS Anand

personal

54

Examples of offensive citation:


"The deficiency of Smith's approach is..."

"The problems with Smiths paper are"


A serious weakness with Smiths argument,
however, is that ......
The key problem with Smiths explanation
is that ......
It seems that Smiths understanding of the
X framework is questionable.

Dr. TJS Anand

55

A better citation would be:


Smiths model was effective in X
problem, however in Y
The X benefit of Smiths approach
are not applicable to Y

Dr. TJS Anand

56

Research Manuscript Structure


A bit on Writing Style - Language
Write in the active tense instead of passive tense:
We collected samples of blah... instead of
Samples of blah were collected...
Avoid all jargon if at all possible. Never assume
the reader knows any jargon.
Write in simple sentences
Subject and verb up-front in all sentences
You can use personal pronouns: We sampled

Dr. TJS Anand

57

Scientific Language - Tenses


Present tense for known facts and hypotheses:
The average life of a honey bee is 6 weeks

Past tense for experiments you have conducted:


All the honey bees were maintained in an
environment with a consistent temperature of 23
degrees centigrade
Past tense when you describe the results of an
experiment:
The average life span of bees in our contained
environment was 8 weeks

Dr. TJS Anand

58

Research Manuscript - Summary


Preparation Style Usage or Words

Examine vs. Analyze


Activity to gain knowledge vs. Describing
the analysis of that knowledge
Blooms Taxonomy
Knowledge
Comprehension
Application
Analysis
Synthesis
Evaluation
Dr. TJS Anand

59

Research Manuscript - Summary


Preparation Style Usage or Words - Blooms Taxonomy
Knowledge - Recitation of fact
Found, identified, labeled
Comprehension: State a problem or interpret fact
Discuss, predict, compare
Application: Apply old information to solve new problems
Solve, show, examine, classify
Analysis: Used to explain patterns or meaning
Analyze, investigate, compare, contrast
Synthesis: Making predictions or discussing possibilities
Predict, plan, devise, propose
Evaluation: Drawing conclusions, making recommendations
Justify, verify, argue, recommend, determine
Dr. TJS Anand

60

Research Manuscript - Summary


Words and expressions to avoid
Jargon

Preferred use

a considerable amount of
on account of
a number of
In a number of cases
Has the capacity to
It is clear that
It is apparent that
Employ
Fabricate

much
because
several
some
can
clearly
apparently
use
make

Source : Day, RA. How to write and publish a scientific paper, 5th edition,
Oryx Press, 1998.

Dr. TJS Anand

61

Research Manuscript
Ethical Publishing

Material must be obtained ethically and must


be accurate
Experiments or trials involving human subjects or
animals must have been approved by the
relevant research ethics committees
Material should be unbiased, uncensored,
complete, factual and verifiable
Relevant funding and any conflict of interest
must be disclosed

Dr. TJS Anand

62

Research Manuscript
Ethical Publishing - Authorship

Authorship requires a significant contribution to


at least one aspect of the work
(concept, data collection, data analysis,
literature review, writing)

Ethical Publishing Things unacceptable


Duplication of previously published material (this
includes web publication of previous print publication,
Web and print publication covered by the same
copyright is now frequent and is OK )
Simultaneous submission to more than one journal
Plagiarism
Dr. TJS Anand

63

Resources / Bibliography
Day, RA. How to write and publish a scientific paper, 5th edition, Oryx Press, 1998.
Ravi Lochanan P. Research Methodology 3rd Edition, Margham Publications, 2009.

Uma Sekaran and Roger Bougie Research Methods for Business 5th Edition, Wiley,
2010.
Salkind NJ. Exploring Research 7th Edition, Pearson, 2009.
Fischer BA, Zigmond MJ. Components of a research article. survival@pitt.edu
Marshal GS. Writing a peer reviewed article.
http://dor.umc.edu/ARCHIVES/GMarshallPublishingarticle.ppt
Hall,
JE.
Writing
research
papers
(and
getting
http://dor.umc.edu/ARCHIVES/GMarshallPublishingarticle.ppt

them

published)

Benos, D., Reich, M. Peer review and publication in APS journals.http://www.theaps.org/careers/careers1/EBSymposia/Benos2003.ppt

Dr. TJS Anand

64

Take Home Message


Sacrifice other interests
Researchers gave up hobbies, games and
time with friends to become high impact
researchers. Most mentioned that they still
had time for family, but less TV, computer
games, and sports.

When you play, play hard; when you work,


work hard, don't play at all.
Theodore Roosevelt

65
Dr. TJS Anand

All the best!

66
Dr. TJS Anand

67
Dr. TJS Anand

Thanking you !

Comments & Suggestions

68
Dr. TJS Anand

Potrebbero piacerti anche