Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Academy of American Franciscan History is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The Americas.
http://www.jstor.org
The Americas
56:4 April 2000, 529-562
Copyrightby the Academy of American
FranciscanHistory
The
exploitationof Andeanvillagersundertheforcedlaborregimefor
529
530
WARDSTAVIG
531
532
COMMUNALSURVIVALIN COLONIALPERU
WARDSTAVIG
533
POTOSI
RICHES
ANDCOMMUNAL
DECLINE
After the fall of Tawantinsuyu,Europeansquickly spread out over the
remains of the Inca Empire in search of the sources of gold and silver that
dazzled Pizarro and his men. In 1545 this search was rewardedwhen an
Indian named Hualpa, working for a Spaniard, discovered what soon
became the world's greatest silver mine. The Spaniardregistered the first
claim at Potosi and was among the first to be enrichedby its ore. Like later
mitayos, neitherHualpanor his grandchildren,who petitionedthe crown for
rights and exemptions in compensationfor the service their grandfatherhad
renderedSpain, benefited from the discovery.9
Word of the precious ore spreadlike wildfire and Potosi, despite being
located in a cold, sterile, windswept and sparsely inhabited region of the
Andes some 4,000 meters above sea level, spranginto existence overnight.
Their heads filled with dreamsof riches, Spaniardsrushed to the cerro rico
and "Indianscame from all partsto extract silver from the hill," many sent
Just a few years after silver was discovby theircuracasor encomenderos.10
ered the wry Jesuit, Father Joseph de Acosta, observed that the "force of
silver, which drawesunto it the desire of all thinges, hathpeopled this mountaine more then (sic) any other place in all these Kingdomes.""1
By 1610
Potosi had some 160,000 residents, including 76,000 Indians and some
6,000 people of partialor full African heritage,but as silver productionfell
so did the population.12By 1719, with an epidemic ragingin Potosi, the Villa
Imperial had shrunk to 60,000 and as the eighteenth century closed the
numberof residentswas estimatedat 24,500.13
In the first years after discovery the amountof ore extractedfrom Potosi
was trulyfantasticand it was duringthese boom years thatthe first naturales
from Canas y Canchis were sent to Potosi. Don Carlos Inca, the heir to the
Inca throne and the Spanish puppet ruler,had been grantedan encomienda
in Canasy Canchisandhe owned mines in Potosi. In 1566 Don Carlosasked
9 FatherJoseph de Acosta, The Natural & Moral History of the Indies, C. Clements Markham,ed.
(London:HakluytSociety, 1880), p. 197.
10 Pedrode Cieza de Leon, Travelsof Pedro de Cieza de Leon, C. ClementsMarkham,ed. and trans.
(London:HakylutSociety, 1864), p. 387.
11 Acosta, Natural & Moral History, p. 197.
12 Bartolom6Arzins de Orstia y Vela, Historia de la Villa
Imperial de Potosi, Lewis Hanke and
GunnarMendoza, eds. Vol. 1 (Providence:Brown University Press, 1965), p. 286.
13 Arzins, Historia, III, 85; Pedro Vicente Cafiete
y Dominguez, Gufa Hist6rica, Geogrdphica,
Fisica, Politica, Civil y Legal del Gobierno e Intendenciade la Provincia de Potosi (Potosi: Editorial
Potosi, 1952), p. 38.
534
his agent to sell the mines and "tohave care and administration[of] the Indians that I have and had in said villa."14
However, it was not throughmine work, but the transportof goods to the
cerro rico that most communities of the upper Vilcanota first began their
relationship with Potosi. Luis Miguel Glave uncovered twenty-four contracts to carry coca from Paucartambo,a province of Cuzco bordering
Quispicanchis, to Potosi between the years 1560-1575. Fourteen of these
contractswere from Canas y Canchis, leading Glave to state that there was
"a labor specializationof the Canas in the transportof coca."15The trajines
or transportof goods remaineda very importantactivity in Canasy Canchis
throughoutthe colonial period, but once institutedit was the mita that took
most Cuzco naturalesto distantPotosi.
By 1560, the richest most accessible ores had been mined and returns
were starting to diminish. Free Indians and Spaniards, along with their
yanacona, drifted away as the mines got deeper, the work harder,and the
rewards less. Low wages and arduous work held as little attractionfor
indigenous workers as for anyone else.16 The shortage of labor became a
serious concern for miners and the crown. Faced with declining quintos and
a scarcity of labor, Spain decided to force Andean villagers to carry the
burden of production through the imposition of the mita. Prosperitywas
returnedto Potosi when the amalgamationprocess, which used poisonous
but precious mercuryto refine low-grade ores, was introducedby Viceroy
Francisco de Toledo in the 1570s. The processing of low-grade ore meant,
however, that vast quantities of ore had to be mined to make the process
profitable.This, in turn,made necessary massive numbersof workersto do
the digging, carrying, refining, and building the new process demanded.
Thus, to secure a labor supply adequatefor increasedneeds, Toledo imposed
the mita on indigenouscommunitiesin the southernAndeanhighland.At the
same time he fixed wage levels for the mita at about one-thirdto one-half
those of free workers.Toledo also restructuredcommunallife by "reducing"
ayllus into villages to assurebettercontroland to facilitate,among otherreasons, the mita and tributecollection. By 1574 the new system was in place
and the first mitayos arrivedin Potosi. After its introduction,this mita subsidy of both workersand lower fixed wages drove the mining industryand
14 ANB.E.P. Bravo, 1568, f39v. (MC97e) 1566, VIII, 27. Cuzco. Cartade Poder: Don Carlos Inca,
vecino, a Pedro de la Torre,vecino de la ciudad de La Plata por diversos efectos incluyendo de minas e
indios.
15 Luis Miguel Glave, "Laproducci6nde los trajines:coca y mercadointernocolonial,"HISLA,No.
6 (Lima, 1986), p. 30.
16 Glave, "La
producci6n,"p. 35.
WARDSTAVIG
535
maintainedPotosi's economic prominence,but at a heavy cost to communities such as those of ruralCuzco. However, the alterationsToledo made in
communalstructureswould, ironically,prove to be an importantcomponent
in their long-termsurvival.
MIGRATION,FLIGHT,FAMILY,AND COMMUNALSUPPORT
536
20 ADC. Corrg.Prov.
Leg. 60, 1601-1677. 1655. Pomacanchemita. Maestro del Campo Joseph de
los Rios y ...
21 ADC. Corrg.Prov. Leg. 61, 1679-1705. 1687. Mita de
Papres.
22 ADC. Corrg.Prov.Leg. 60, 1601-1677. 1646. Mita de
Quispicanchis.ADC. Corrg.Prov.Leg. 61,
1679-1705. 1690. Mita. Pomacanche,Sangarar6.
23 ADC. Corrg.Prov. Leg. 61, 1679-1705. 1687. Mita de
Papres.
24 ADC. Corrg.Prov. Leg. 60, 1601-1677. 1646. Mita de
Quispicanchis.
WARDSTAVIG
537
Layo, San Pedro de Cacha, and San Pablo de Cacha noted that the families
accompaniedthe men.25
One way communitiestriedto lessen the burdenof those selected was by
using communalresourcesto provide the mitayos with supplies to help sustain them while away. Variationsin the goods families of equal size had on
theirllamas as they starteddown the royal roadtowardPotosi suggest differing levels of communalsupport.However, since people took theirown supplies differences may have stemmed from individualwealth, but no matter
what the supplementthe primaryburdenwas borneby the mitayo family.
Mitayos from the Cuzco region typically took with them large loads of
coca, grown in the nearby province of Paucartamboor even in Quispicanchis, to avoid having to purchasethe precious leaf in the inflated marketof
Potosi and to sell to help maintain themselves. While unfortunatelynot
revealing if the goods were personalor communal,a 1690 list or c6dula (the
term was also used to describe the workerson it) of mitayos and their wives
from Pomachapedetails the supplies takento Potosi. MartinChoque and his
wife, JosephaMalque had six llamas loaded with corn, chufio (freeze-dried
potatoes), wheat, coca and their toldo (presumablya tent-like shelter),while
JosephAlvaradoandTeresaSisa left with the same goods, but with only four
loaded llamas. In 1770 a Potosi official noted the goods, such as Peruvian
chili or aji and coca, arrivingwith the mitayos and observed that they sold
These goods
many of these provisions, especially to the Indianmerchants.26
and people representjust one small portionof the wealth, humanand otherwise, that the mita transferredout of indigenous communities and into the
non-subsistencecolonial economy.27
Few Cuzco mitayos had the resourcesto purchasetheir way out of service, as did many naturalesin regions closer to the Potosi market.Thus, this
practice, known as faltriquera, was not widespread in rural Cuzco. Mita
captains from Canas y Canchis in the late seventeenthcenturytestified that
there were few indios de faltriquera,or colquehaques as they were also
called, in theirprovince, "becausethose [Indians]thatthere are, are few and
25 Cuzco 1689. Economia sociedad en el sur
andino. Informesde los pdrrocosal obispo Molliendo,
y
HoracioVillanuevaUrteaga,pr6logo y transcripci6n(Cuzco: Centro
Bartolom6de Las Casas, 1982), pp.
127-173 and 236-252.
26 ANB. E.C.
1770, p. 81. Don ManuelMaruri,regidorde Potosi y receptordel derechode alcabalas,
sobre que se continuanel pago de las que estan obligados a pagar los enteradoresde mita y sus segundos de los efectos de comestibles y ropa de la sierraque introducenen la villa para su expendido en las
tiendas, plazas y canchas.
27 ADC. Corrg.Prov. Leg. 61, 1679-1705. 1690; Mita. Pomacanche.For a discussion of the transfer
of wealth out of the communitiessee Nicolas Sinchez-Albornoz,Indios y tributosen el Alto Peru'(Lima:
Institutode Estudios Peruanos, 1978).
538
COMMUNAL
IN COLONIAL
SURVIVAL
PERU
WARDSTAVIG
539
32 ADC.
Corrg.Prov. Leg. 60, 1601-1677. 1633. Don Diego Arqui yndio viejo naturalde Pichigua
(hurinsaya).
33 S'nchez-Albornoz, Indios y tributos,p. 144.
34 ADC. Corrg. Prov. Crim. Leg. 81, 1776-84. 1780. Coporaque. Criminal contra Jose Chaco o
Ylachaco por usurpacionde RS. tributosal Rey, y a los yndios quando fue cobradorde este ramo en el
ayllo Ancocagua de este mismo pueblo.
35 Sinchez-Albornoz, Indios y tributos,p. 144.
540
COMMUNALSURVIVALIN COLONIALPERU
37 ADC. Corrg. Prov. Leg. 60, 1601-1677. 1646. Mita. Quispicanchis.ADC. Corrg.Prov. Leg. 60,
1601-1677. 1674. Mita. Marcaconga.
37 ADC. Corrg.Prov. Leg. 61, 1679-1705. 1690. Mita. Pomacanche,Sangarari.
38 Luis Capoche (1585), "Relaci6nGeneralde la Villa Imperialde Potosif,"in Relaciones
hist6ricas
literarias de la America Meridional (Madrid:Biblioteca de autoresespafioles, (1959), p. 135.
39 MercurioPeruano, 1792. Edicion Fuentes, I, 208 as cited in GabrielRen&-Moreno,"La Mita de
Potosi en 1795," p. 8.
WARDSTAVIG
541
tent for most of the colonial period. For Cuzquefiomitayos this meant onehalf year of service, threemonthseach way, was only partiallycompensated,
if at all. As late as 1729 villages in Canas y Canchis were still demanding
the payment, but they were also threateningto withhold tribute if leguaje
was not paid.40Thus, they attemptedto pressurethe state into forcing the
paymentof what was by law theirs.
For the Cuzquefiomigrantsthe trek across the altiplanowas long and difficult, cold or rainaddingto the hazards.For some threemonthsthese Cuzco
families walked and campedtheirway some 450 miles throughthe Andes to
the cerrorico underthe guidanceand supervisionof the enteradoror captain
of the mita.4' For those with small childrenthe journey must have been especially arduous.Perhapsthis is why some couples made what must have been
the very difficultdecision not to take theirchildrenwith them which, in turn,
provided strong incentive to return.Thus, the sheer distance to Potosi was
also a significantproblemfor mitayos like those from Cuzco that the forced
laborersfrom provincesnearerthe cerrorico did not face. In 1689, a Sicuani
priest reported that the number of community members continued to
decline, "it is rarethat [the mitayos and theirfamilies] returnfor lack of provisions and for the very greatdistancethatthey are from Potosi and because
the Royal ordinancesare not complied with."42Mitayos were supposed to
serve one year in Potosi, but the "greatdistance"and time of travel led the
communitiesof Canas y Canchis and some other distantregions to develop
a policy of two years service. Thus, the burdensand separationsforced on
peoples who came from villages in these provinces were even greaterthan
for others.A Canasy Canchispriest,sensitive to the impactof colonial exactions and abuses, complained the communities were "dissipated"due to
pressuresfrom corregidores"andprincipallythe mita of Potosi, where each
two years they despatchfrom each parishmore thantwenty Indians,that are
entire families."43
Despite the problems, Quispicanchis and Canas y Canchis were recognized by the state as being very consistent in their delivery of mitayos. A
40 ANP.
SuperiorGobierno(S. Gob.) L.8, C. 146, 1729. Expedientepromovidoanteel SuperiorGobierno, sobre la regulacionde los tributosde la Provinciade Canas y Canches, paraque se les pague a los
indios del servicio de minas, la bonificaci6n de leguaje, cuando concurrena lugares apartados.ANB.
MSS2 (Ruck). 1603. Paraque el corregidorde Potosi y los demis ... hagan pagarlo que se ocupan en
yr y bolver a sus pueblos, fl53-154v).
41 Hemming, Conquest of the Incas, p. 407; Cafiete y Dominguez, Guia hist6rica, pp. 106-07;
Crespo Rodas, "El reclutamineto,"pp. 471-75.
42 Cuzco 1689, p. 243.
43 Cuzco 1689, p. 241. For a similarpolicy in the Lake Titicacaregion see BNP. B585.1673. Despacho de la mita de Potosi. Puno, 2 November 1673.
542
seventeenth century document that stipulates which communities the governmentconsidered buenos, medianos, o malos (good, average, or bad) in
their mita compliance has "bueno"behind almost all Cuzco communities.
This was not the case for all regions. The nearbyprovince of Chucuitoin the
Lake Titicacabasin certainlydid not have such a reputation."The high level
of mita compliance in Quispicanchisand Canas y Canchis was reflected in
the increasingpercentageof all mitayos who were from ruralCuzco, especially Canas y Canchis. When the mita was first established,Canas y Canchis contained5.9 percentof the total numberof mitayos. By 1692 this percentage had increased to 11.9, making it the province that supplied the
highest percentageof mitayos to Potosi.45By fulfilling theirmita obligations
the communities of ruralCuzco maintainedtheir good standing,their right
to exist. It was understoodas establishinga bond of reciprocitybetween subjects and the crown.46However, the villages of Cuzco paid a heavy price for
their strict compliance with the mita as many mitayo families remainedin
Potosi or became forasteros.47
By the late seventeenthcentury colonial officials could no longer avoid
the fact that the failure of mitayos to return home was devastating the
provinces. Viceroy de la Palata's census of the 1680s revealed that since
Toledo established the mita a little more than a century earlier there were
58,092 fewer tributaries,over half the original total, living in the communities subject to the mita and that 5,557 originarioswere living in Potosi. He
orderedthese people returnedto their communitiesand excused them from
tributefor one year, but as was often the case the orderwas not enforced. In
1692, Viceroy Monclova found 6,084 originariosstill living in Potosi. While
Quispicanchishad only 143 originariosresidentin the Villa Imperial,Canas
y Canchis had 999, more than any other province. Includedin the list were
only those adult males born in their provinces who had come to Potosi, not
those born in Potosi who were referredto as "criollos"(not to be confused
with people of Europeandescent born in the New World,the more common
44 AGN. B. A. Sala 9, 6-2-5, 22. Meml de las Provinciasy Pueblos qe estan obligados a enuiaryndios
para la mita del cerro de Potosi con distincion de quales son buenos medianos y malos, 2 fs.
45 Nicolas Sainchez-Albornoz,"Mita,migracionesy pueblo. Variacionesen el espacio y en el tiempo.
Alto Peri, 1573-1692, " Historia Boliviana, III (1983), p. 59; For percentagesof all provinces see Ward
Stavig, "TheIndianPeoples of RuralCuzco in the Era of ThupaAmaro,"Ph.D. dissertation.University
of California,Davis (1991), p. 351.
46 Tandeter,Coercionand Market,p. 19.
47 AHP. C.R. 26. Yanaconas.In the late sixteenth
century several people with origins in the upper
Vilcanotawere registeredin Potosi as yanaconaof the crown. Among those who took such action were:
Domingo Ato, aged thirty, from Tinta and married;Francisco Guanco, a twenty-year-old man from
Sicuani who had lived in Potosi since he was a small child; and Juan Saucani from Guaro(c), whose
fatherhad been a huayrador,and who was marriedand had a four-month-oldbaby.
WARDSTAVIG
543
544
IN COLONIAL
COMMUNAL
SURVIVAL
PERU
WARDSTAVIG
545
royal fifths, served the public good "and because the said Provinces and
pueblos ... are deterioratedof people."The fatherof these brothershad died
and for many years they had lived in the province of Porco near Potosi.
However, when the baptismal record from Acopia was presented and
Agustin's godmother confirmed his birth that was enough for the court
which orderedthat they ought "to be restoredto their pueblo and Province
of origin in order ... [that] they may have recourse to mita service from
which depends the conservation of the Royal treasury and the public
good."54 In this case the community's and the crown's interests coincided
and the communityused colonial law to enforce its wishes.
Most people who fled their communities were, however, not found. By
the late seventeenth century 12.5 per cent of the forastero population of
Chayanta,a province close to Potosi, was composed of people from Canas
y Canchis. Having either escaped mita service or having decided not to
returnhome aftercompletingtheirturn,these folk ceased to be a partof their
communitiesin ruralCuzco. Becoming forasteros,they rentedlands or they
congregatedwhere employmentcould be found such as the mining center of
Cabanillaswhere several forasterosfrom Canas y Canchis resided.'"These
people were a most significantloss to their villages in ruralCuzco.
INPOTOSI
WORK,LIFE,ANDSEGREGATION
Upon arrivalin Potosi mitayos were assigned their various tasks, some
being sent into the mines while others were orderedto the refining mills.
From the very onset of the mita there was a consistency to these assignments, communities being placed with the same miners and refiners year
after year. Death, decline in population, sale of mines, and alteration in
assignments sometimes disrupted the consistency, but for the most part
mitayos had knowledge, either personalor by word of mouth, of the people
for whom they would work when they arrivedin Potosi. For instance, several Quispicanchisand Canas y Canchis mitayos worked for the Gamberete
family. In 1692 Potosi officials had allocated to Miguel de Gamberetetwo
different groups of 80 mitayos each for his mines and refineries. In one
group25 mitayos were from Pichiguaand 13 from San Pedroand San Pablo
54 ANB. Minas 7. 126. no. 8 1798. Don BartolomdUancoiro y don SebastianCondori,enteradores
de la mita del pueblo de Acopia ... sobre que los hermanosBaltasary Agustin Ramos exhiben sus partidas de bautizo, por donde constardla obligacion que tienen de servir la mita de Potosi, como originarios de dicho pueblo.
55 Brian Evans, "Census Enumerationin Late 17th
CenturyAlto Peru:The NumeracionGeneralof
1683-1684," Studies in SpanishAmericanPopulation History, David Robinson,ed. (Boulder:Westview
Press, 1981).
546
56 ANB. M147 (Minas no.11l) Mano de obra minera no. 686. 1692. IV, 27, Lima. Repartimiento
generalde indios de mita paralas minas e ingenios de Potosi hecho al orden del conde de la Monclava,
virrey del Peru.And ANB 147 (Minas 1392) 1736. VI, 24-1736 XI.i Potosi. Entregade indios de mita:
El capitaingeneral de ella a los interesadosde las provinciasde Porco, Canas y Canches, Chuquito.
57 Cafietey Dominguez, Guia Histdrica, p. 112.
58 Enrique Tandeter,"Propiedady gesti6n en la mineria potosina de la segunda mitad del siglo
XVIII," Paper presented at El Sistema Colonial en Mesoamerica y los Andes. VII Simposio Internacional. Consejo Latinoamericanode Ciencias Sociales (CLASCO) Comision de Historia Economica.
Lima. 1986.
59 Crespo Rodas, "La Mita,"pp. 17-18. JeffreyA. Cole, "An Abolitionism Born of Frustration:The
Conde de Lemos and the Potosi Mita, 1667-73," HAHR63:2 (1983). The Conde de Lemos, one of the
viceroys most sympatheticto the plight of the workers,orderedmitayos be allowed to leave at the end
of the day to sleep in their own residences. But this regulationseems not to have been enforced once the
viceroy's term of office was up, if it was ever enforced to any extent.
WARDSTAVIG
547
60
Acarete du Biscay, An Account of a Voyageup the River de La Plata and Thence Over Land to
Peru, (n.p.: 1698), p. 50.
61 Capoche,Relacidn General, pp. 158-159.
62 Acosta, Natural & Moral
History, p. 212.
63
ThierrySaignes provided me with the informationbased on RepartimientoGeneraldel Marques
de Montesclaros, 1610, BibliothequeNationale de Paris,ms. espagnol n. 175, ff., pp. 257-318 and AGI.
Charcas51(?). 1617 Lista de mitayos presentesy faltos en Potosi; For totals see Stavig, "TheIndianPeoples," pp. 361-362.
64 ADP. San Pablo 1749-1787. 1750, 6v.
548
PERU
INCOLONIAL
SURVIVAL
COMMUNAL
WARDSTAVIG
549
regime, as well as the law, most drinkingwas done at fiestas or after mass
on Sundays.To furthercontrol the situation,a law was passed which sought
to dampen indigenous' revelry by prohibitingnaturalesfrom beating their
drums while drinking.The drummingof inebriatedIndians disturbedthe
Spaniardswho describedthe sounds emanatingfrom the indigenousbarrios
as "bien indecentey mal sonante."69
Even in mattersof faith native people were kept separatefrom the Spanish communityand, to a fair degree, from otherAndeanindigenouspeoples.
Naturalesfrom Quispicanchiswere incorporatedinto the parishes of Santa
Barbara,San Sevastian, and San Pedro. Mitayos and others from Canas y
Canchis were in the parishes of San Pedro, San Pablo, San Juan, Concepci6n, Copacavana, Santiago and Sta. Bunvana (Santa Buenaventura?).70
Mitayos, and sometimes the "indioscriollos," were also requiredto support
a church and a priest in Potosi based on their villages of origin. Thus, not
only were naturalesfrom the same region concentratedin the same part of
the city, but they also attendedthe same masses and even shared the economic burden of their church. For instance, the three communities over
which T6ipacAmaru was curaca-Pampamarca, Su(o)rimanaand Tungasuca-were all in the parishof Santiago.
Communitymemberseven remainedunited in death.Those parish death
registers that specify if the deceased was born in rural Cuzco or in Potosi
indicatethat aboutone-half the deathsrecordedfrom villages in ruralCuzco
were actually people born in the Villa Imperial who were referred to as
"criollos."Even though many of these indios criollos from Cuzco no longer
had lands or possessions in the ayllus from which their families had come,
they continued to have contact with people from their villages and were
identified with those people by churchand state. For instance, when Roque,
the legitimate child of Martin Vilcay and Maria Poma, both criollos of
Potosi, died in 1761 at one year of age, his passing was recorded in the
parishof Concepci6n,along with the deathsof othersfrom Coporaque.Even
thoughbothparentshad been bornin Potosi, he was identifiedwith the community from which his forebearshad migrated.Likewise, Ysidora, the child
of Manuel Humachi and Alfonza Chequa-both criollos of Potosi-died
after one day on this earth. Four days later the mother joined her baby,
69 La Audienciade
Charcas,Correspondenciade presidentesy oidores,RobertoLevillier,ed. (Buenos
Aires, 1922), I, pp. 68-70; For a laterperiod see ThomasAbercrombie,"Q'achasand La Plebe in 'Rebellion': Carnivalvs. Lent in 18th CenturyPotosi,"Journalof LatinAmericanAnthropology2:1 (1996).
70 ANB. M.T. 147. (Minas 1367a, Mano de obraminera721a). Potosi. Extractode las
provinciasque
vienen a mitara esta Villa de Potosi, su CerroRico y Rivera, con los pueblos que cada uno tienen...los
curatosa quienes tocan los indios....
550
COMMUNALSURVIVALIN COLONIALPERU
WARDSTAVIG
551
raque, and 13 from Pueblo Nuevo, which was three to six times the death
ratethese communitieshad experiencedover the precedingdecade. Families
were wiped out. Pablo Luntu and his wife, Nicolasa Casa died. Francisco
Cayagua, age 13, succumbed, followed shortly by his father and mother.
Maria Colquema and her son, Melchor were also among the victims from
rural Cuzco.77 Confrontedwith massive death and with no end of the epidemic in sight, mita captains and enteradoresasked that the mita be suspendeduntil the epidemic ceased. Ever mindful of theirhome communities,
these indigenous officials warnedthat if this was not done before the new
mita people would flee and the communities would be ruined. Soberly
reflecting on the devastation,these naturalesnoted that already "innumerable mita Indiansfrom all regions may be dead with the pestilence."78
ANDVILLAGE
CUzco MITAYOS
SOLIDARITY
INTHE18THCENTURY
The devastationof 1719-1720 disruptedcommunalcompliance with the
mita in Canas y Canchis and Quispicanchisfor several years, the longest
known interruptionof the colonial period. In 1727, the colonial official
Felipe de Santistebanwas orderedto recounttributariesin the provinces of
Lampa,Azangaro and Canas y Canchis in order to reestablishtributepayments and the Potosi mita. In the six years since the epidemic the communities of Sicuani, Marangani,Lurucachi,Checacupaand Pitumarcahad not
sent mitayos. While these communities may have delivered their mitayos
after 1727, the fact that new mita numerationswere conducted in 1733 for
Quispicanchisand Canas y Canchis and again in 1736 for Canas y Canchis
suggests on-going instabilityin mita compliancein the wake of the devastation. This may well have been calculated resistance by the communities,
however even authoritiescould not agree on the number of mitayos the
Cuzco communities were obliged to send. Two 1733 lists of mitayos-one
from Lima and the other from Potosi-provided differing mita quotas for
Canas y Canchis. Not surprisinglythe list from Potosi, where demand for
workers was ever pressing, ordered a significantly greater number of
mitayos--453-to the mines than that from Lima-318.79 It is unlikely that
77 ADP. Defunciones. San Sebastian,
Concepci6n.
78 ANB. E. Can. no.68 t.126,
no.XIII (M9291). 1719. XII, 15. Carangas.Don JuanBautistaUri-Siri
alcalde mayor y capitanenteradorde la mita...ennombrede los demas capitanesenteradores...sobreque
se suspendala mita hasta que cese la peste en Potosi.
79 ANP. L. 10 C. 234. 1727. Diligencias que se actuaronen orden a la revisita numeracion
y
que de
los indios tributariosde los repartimientosde Lampa, Azangaro, Canas y Canches .. .; ANB. M147
(Minas 1365) 1733. VI, p. 15, Lima. Nueva numeraciongeneralde indios sujetos a la mita de Potosi ...;
ANB. (Minas 1392) 1736. VI, 24- 1736. XI, p. 1. Entregade indios de mita ... En la Retasa del Pueblo
de Cullupatahuvo ciento sesenta, tributarioslos ciento veinte, y siete originarios(should be 142), y los
552
COMMUNALSURVIVALIN COLONIALPERU
dies y ocho Forasterosde que revajantreinta,y tres los dies, y ocho por Forasteros,y quinse parael servicio de la Yglesia Republica,y Restan parala deduccion de la mita ciento veinte, y siete Yndios originarios, cuia septima parte son diez, y ocho Yndios, y seis para de continuo trabajocon dos descansos.
ANB. M. t. 147 (Minas 1367 y Mano de ObraNo. 7219). 1733. Extractode las provinciasque vienen a
mitar a esta villa de Potosi su, cerro Rico y Rivera .. .; See also EnriqueTandeter,"Trabajoforzado y
trabajolibre en el Potosi colonial tardio,"Desarrollo Econ6mico, 80 (1981), p. 516.
80 ADC. Corrg. Prov. Leg. 69, 1772-75. Yauri. Diego Merma, yndio del Pueblo de Yauri contra
Mateo Lima y Thomas Pallani indios del mismo pueblo por ciento y viente ovejas.
81 ADC. Intend.Prov.Ord.Leg. 94, 1797-99. 1797. Siquani.no. 44. Robo en Pichigua. Lucas Chancayarni.
WARDSTAVIG
553
554
WARDSTAVIG
555
cials in Maranganitook 160 of his sheep, which the state later ordered
returnedto the family. When asked why they had taken the sheep they
answeredsimply that Sunca was "comfortableand a forastero."9'
Communities, caciques and provincial corregidorswere under constant
pressurefrom officials and mine owners in Potosi to maintainmita deliveries. While this vigilance was constant, so was the resistance. However, it
was not just those subject to the mita who objected. Corregidorsand other
Spaniardsfrom rural Cuzco had no inherent interest, other than to avoid
trouble with colonial authorities, in having the naturales on whom they
relied for labor,production,and as a market,going off to Potosi. Likewise,
curacas saw the mita, and flight from the mita, as a threatto communal, as
well as theirown, well-being. Accusationsof hiding men and using them for
private purposes were frequent.When in the 1720s a crown representative
conducted a revisita in Canas y Canchis and regions near Lake Titicaca,
Potosi miners distrustedhis figures because he was the corregidorof Canas
y Canchis and his brotherwas a priest near Lake Titicaca. The Potosinos
instinctively suspected that there were naturaleswho had not gone on official lists because the brothersor their associates wantedto pocket theirtribute or use them in their own businesses.92Similarargumentshad been made
since the initiation of the mita. Corregidorswho did not force compliance
with the mita were threatenedwith suspension, while miners and government officials also blamed curacas and hacendados who gladly received
those who fled the mita for the decline in their labor supply. It was argued
that corregidors "occupied [Indians] in their businesses, trag(j)ines, and
marketing"and they and other Spaniardsin the provinces were accused of
"excesses and frauds"in lowering the mita.93Thus, on the issue of the mita
the people in the provinces-rich and powerful, poor and weak, indigenous
and Spanish-sometimes shared a common ground, but the influence of
Potosi silver usually outweighed local concerns.
556
COMMUNAL
SURVIVAL
PERU
INCOLONIAL
In ruralCuzco naturaleshelped meet their needs and comply with colonial exactions throughthe productionand transportof goods to Potosi and
other markets.The trajinesor haulingof merchandisewas especially important here. In this way the continued economic significance of Potosi and
other mining centers in Alto Peru createdan ironic situationfor the peoples
of Quispicanchisand Canas y Canchis.Their forced labor in the mines produced the wealth thatspurredthe colonial economy and createdmarketsthat
needed to be supplied.Throughtheirwork in trajines,agriculture,and obrajes they earnedsilver and suppliedthe marketsthatthey helped create.This
made it possible for themto meet levels of demandsthatcould not have been
sustained without these earnings. Thus, the mitayos' work in Potosi made
possible increased state exploitation which the naturaleswere able to meet
by working to supply Potosi and other marketswhere demand would have
been much weaker without their mita labor.
Naturalesin Quispicanchisand Canas y Canchis developed strategiesto
preserve their communities and minimize the damage of the mita, while
forcing people to rendertheir obligation to the crown. The degree to which
they succeeded attests to their tremendouswill to maintaintheir communal
way of life, as well as their ingenuity.As with other matters,the colonial
legal system was one of the first lines of defense, althoughit never brought
the total relief so desired.While the crown pressed enforcementof the mita,
it occasionally lowered or relieved this burdenwhen formallyrequestedand
when to do otherwise could well have strainedrelations and undermined
colonial legitimacy.For instance, duringand afterepidemics, such as thatof
1719-1720, the mita was not always enforced. Likewise, during times of
drought mitayos were not necessarily pursued when they returnedhome.
Some colonial officials even used incentives and theirlegal powers to foster
mita complianceand communalstability.CorregidorDon Gregoriode Viana
of Canas y Canchis orderedcaciques in Sicuani to distributevacant urban
plots "to the Indiansthat go to the mita ... of the Villa de Potosi."94By this
gesture Viana, in a small but direct way, acted to maintainthe community,
and his own and the crown's interests.
Through the legal system-the "working of the system"-naturales
denouncedabusive treatmentin Potosi and attemptedto abolish mita service
entirely, sometimes with the support of Spaniards.When the caciques of
Tintapetitionedthe governmentto abolish the mita in 1789, the priestsof the
province providedwritten supportfor the abolition.The priest from Langui
94 ADC. Corrg. Prov. Leg. 70, 1776-79. 1777. Antonio Hancco, indio del Aillo Lari contra Dofia
ThomasaRequelme sobre un solar.
WARDSTAVIG
557
and Layo wrote thatdue to forced laborin Potosi "thesepoor mitayos suffer
such calamities in their leaving, stay and returnthat they cannot explain it
withoutmakingthe heartcry blood."The priestarguedthatin the mines they
contracteddiseases thatare "verygrave for the fatigue of the chest and lungs
of which they suffer,that while they do not die they are unfit for all species
of work:he who suffersmost from this disease, for which therehas not been
a remedy,hardlylives a year;in the present[year]fourteenhave died vomitThe priest of Yanaocaarguedthe case against
ing blood from the mouth."95
the mitamore succinctly,"YourExcellency the statein which these miserable
Indiansare found most probably[is] caused by said mita."96
Complaintsby Canas y Canchis caciques against the mita in the 1700s
mirroredthose made two centuriesearlier.The travel stipendor leguaje was
not being paid. People had to sell many of their goods just to provision
themselves for the journey.When they returnedto their communitiesnothing awaited them-"their houses [were] destroyed, their fields ... [were]
uncultivated"-except the "paymentof five or six tercios (tributefor two
and one-half or threeyears) thatthey have fallen behindduringtheirabsence
in Potosi." The caciques continued to be charged tributeand, one of them
argued,"[as] we caciques do not have the means to replace this money, it is
necessary to charge them [the mitayos] upon their return.This is the cause
why more do not returnto their Pueblos remainingvagabonds."'97
While local officials like the corregidordemandedrespect,the face-to-face
natureof indigenous-corregidorrelationsgave more complex form to these
interactionswhich often proved to be antagonistic.The king, however, was
for the most partconsideredto be above the evil and exploitationdone in his
name. This special tie to the king was perhapsmost clear in indigenouscompliance with the Potosi mita. Mita work was viewed by many communities
as part of the pact of reciprocity,albeit an increasingly onerous part, they
believed existed between themselves and the crown. EnriqueTandeterpoints
out that mitayos from a province neighboringCanas y Canchis arguedthat
their service to the king throughthe mita endowed them with special rights.
They made demandsof otherIndiansin routeto Potosi, rioted,remaineddefiant and even meted out punishmentin the name of the king.
ThemitaIndiansdidnotfailto notethatthemitawasa "painfultask,"and
thatin Potositheywould"undergo
butit is alsoevidentthatcomhardships,"
pliancewith this obligationwas perceivedas partof a peculiarrelationship
95 BNP. C373. 1789. Representacionhecha por los caciques de este partidode Tinta, e informes de
sus respectivos curas sobre extinguie la mita que va a la villa de Potosi.
96 Ibid.
97 Ibid.
558
COMMUNALSURVIVALIN COLONIALPERU
WARDSTAVIG
559
Thus, ayllu Suio used the Potosi mita and other colonial demands that
threatenedcommunity solidarityto enforce that solidarityby making compliance steps on a ladder that led to positions of honor and respect. They
took an obligation of the state and, in line with what de Certeausuggested,
"they made it function in anotherregister."'03By so doing they protected
their social reproductionand safeguardedtheir compact with the king and
state throughinternaland agreed upon means.'04
Despite efforts to ensure that the mita rotation was completed, mitayos
sometimes fled Potosi and returnedhome. While such action may be viewed
as a form of resistance,the prematurereturnof mitayos, especially when not
justified by community standards,put the curacaand community in a difficult position. In these instances unprovoked fleeing was not viewed by
Cuzco villagers as resistance to colonial authority,but as a challenge and
threatto the community.
When Lucas Cano, the enteradorfrom Layo (Canas y Canchis), and his
son Juan, a c6dula, slipped away from Potosi before finishing their service
communityofficials had theirgoods, includingover 700 sheep, 20 cows and
some 75 llamas, embargoed.Then Lucas, his wife, and two of his sons were
jailed. In spite of Cano's accountsof abuse, communityofficials arguedthat
Cano had "abandonedthe people thatwere his responsibilitywhom he ought
to have restoredto the pueblo and from whose abandonmentnew responsibility and delay in the collection of tributescan result, inasmuch as those
dispersed Indians perhaps may not returnto their pueblo. Cano is accustomed to fleeing the Potosi mita as he did now some years ago, that when
named c6dula he fled without completing his time."'05
With a historyof fleeing, Cano's tale of abuse was not believed. Cano and
membersof his family escaped from jail not once, but twice. The first time
they not only put up resistance,but also were aidedby membersof the neighboring communityof Langui.The peoples of Languiand Layo were often at
odds with one another,so it was not surprisingthatthey might help someone
avoiding the "justice"of Layo. It was somewhatironic, however,since just a
year earlier the people of Langui had broughtcharges against one of their
enteradores,MatiasAquino, for fleeing Potosi along with all but one of the
mitayosunderhis supervision.Aquinoclaimedthathe andthe othershadfled
due to excessively harsh labor demands and difficult conditions. Aquino
103de Certeau,pp. 31-32.
104 Stavig, "EthnicConflict,"p. 743.
105 ADC. Inten. Ord. Leg. 53, 1802-03. 1803. Layo. Autos seguidos por el yndio Lucas Cano contra
el cacique GabrielGuamainy Alcalde mayorVenturaSarviadel Pueblo de Layo sobre prision y embargo
de sus ganados injustamente.
560
IN COLONIAL
PERU
COMMUNAL
SURVIVAL
declaredthatit was "too much work thatcaused us to give up, as we did not
rest, not even an instant,even though working with our wives and children
while not completing [the quota] of our day's work and recently we found
ourselves in a state of perishing without having anything to eat."'" Juan
Apasa, the mitayo who remainedin Potosi, claimed thatAquino had acted in
bad faith as enterador,while others testified that Aquino had influenced
people to leave. Anotherenteradorwho servedafterAquino statedthathe and
the mitayos had been well treatedand had been paid their travel monies.
Othersmaintainedthatthey had always been treated"withthe utmosthumanity and consideration"in the De La Cuestarefinery.Not only were they paid
theirleguaje,but they even had money advancedto them when neededby the
operatorsof De La Cuesta.107Thus, it appearsthatAquino and most of those
under his supervisionattemptedto take advantageof the bad reputationof
Potosi to cover their desire not to serve. The people of Langui disliked mita
service, but they realized the necessity of fulfilling their obligation to the
crown in order to maintainthe community.Trustingtheir own face-to-face
experience-their personal relations-they did not supportwhat they considered to be unwarrantedcomplaints by those who wished to avoid what
they all wished to avoid, but could not. By fleeing when conditions did not
warrantsuch resistance,Aquino andthe othershad violatednormsof conduct
and placed an economic burdenon the community.To keep the community
out of difficulties with colonial authorities,the communitybroughtcharges
againstAquino to force payment of the 378 pesos he and the others owed,
which otherwisemight fall on the community.108
In 1775 an enteradorand mitayos from Coporaquealso abandonedPotosi
and returnedto their community. Due to their good reputation,however,
these naturales were treated quite differently by their curacas, Eugenio
Sinanyucaand Roque Mollo. Two days before Christmasthe curacaswrote
to the corregidorthat Bartolom6Garcia, enterador,and Gregorio Choquecota, c6dula, had returnedfrom Potosi without fulfilling their obligations
and thatthey had been detained.When asked why they had fled, the curacas
noted that:
... theyhadexperiencedverybadwhippingsandaffrontson the partof the
headcarpenter
andotheradministrators
of therefineryof Dn.Bernardo
Zenda
andthatnotbeingpossiblefor themto enduresuchinhumanetreatment
they
106ADC. Intend. Ord. Leg. 52, 1802. Langui. Expediente promovido por el yndio Matias Aquino
sobre no volver a turnarla mita de Potosi y libertadde pagarpor los profugos.
107ADC. Intend. Ord. Leg. 52, 1802. Langui. Expediente promovido pr el yndio Matias Aquino
sobre no bolber a turnarla mita de Potosi y libertadde pagarpr los profugos.
108Ibid.
WARDSTAVIG
561
. .
enteradores
andcedulasthatreturnfromsaidmita[and]theydo notpay the
leguaje,norjustly [pay]the dailywages andthatthey obligethemto work
morethanphysicallypossibleandas a resultmanyIndiansreturnwithchest
injuriesandthey die herethenasthmatics,for this reasoneveryonehas the
greatesthorrorof saidmita.Althoughwe havetriedto persuadethetwo Indiansto returnto completetheirmitatimetheyabsolutelyresistandwe do not
have [means]to remitthemby force a distanceof morethantwo hundred
havealsocomplained
on otheroccasionsof violence....
leagues.... Captains
WeimploreYourMagesty... for a remedyof the referredexcessesthatwe
bearandfor whichwe askjustice... .109
Like the people in Langui,the caciques of Coporaquetrustedin theirown
and the community's face-to-face experiences. On this occasion, however,
the communitysupportedthe assertionsof theirneighborswho were of good
repute, especially since they had previous knowledge of the abusive treatment meted out by those to whom village mitayos were assigned.Corregidor
Reparaz, known for his fair treatmentof the naturales,asked officials in
Potosi to end the abuses the mitayos suffered at the hands of those in the
refineryof BernardoZenda, and he orderedBartolomeGarciaand Gregorio
Choquecota freed on bail."oReparaz trusted the word of Sinanyuca and
Molle, just as Sinanyucaand Molle trustedthe word of theirpeople. Because
theirface-to-facedealings createdtrust,the corregidor,curacas,and community memberswere able to work togetherto alleviate a difficult situation.
When such understandingrelationsdid not exist, which was much of the
time, the result of such conflicts could be very different.The "cacique of
Surimanafrom 1750-1766, was bankruptedby the seizureof a trainof mules
and a hundredpesos worth of goods because his mita quota was one man
109ADC. Corrg.Prov. Crim.
Leg. 80, 1773-75. 1775. Coporaque.Quejas de los caciques de Coporaquepor el mal tratamientoque sus indios reciben en la mita de Potosi.
110Ibid.
562
WARD STAVIG
111John Rowe, "The Inca underSpanish Colonial Institutions,"HAHR, v.37 (1957), p. 176.
112 I encounteredlittle evidence about the mita
duringor in the wake of the 1780 rebellion.