Sei sulla pagina 1di 11

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD


PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv, Israel
Fax: 077-3179186

"
6133301 ",33407 "
Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org

[]
August4,2015
JudgeMichaelSpitzer
Director,AdministrationofCourts
Byemail:MICHALTS@court.gov.il,ronam@court.gov.il,Pniyot@court.gov.il,
Dover@court.gov.il
RE:Requestforclarificationsregardinglettersfromyouroffice,pertainingtoIT
systemsofthecourts,suspectedasfraud.
Yourresponsewithin14daysiskindlyrequested.
DearJudgeSpitzer:
Ihereinrequestyourclarificationregardingthequestionsbelow,pertainingtotheattached
July26andAugust3,2015lettersbyAttorneyHeliBrachafromtheAdministrationof
Courts,whicharesuspectedfraud:
1) WhatarethepositiontitleandauthorityofAttorneyHeliBrachaintheAdministrationof
Courts?Whowassheappointedby?
Brachafailedtoindicateherpositioninhersignaturesontheletters,andalsofailedto
providesuchdata,evenaftertheexplicitrequestinmyJuly26,2015response.
2) WhatarethecaptionsandfilenumbersofthecourtcasesthatAttorneyBracharefersto?
Brachafailedtoprovidesuchdataevenaftermyexplicitrequest(apparentlycasesbothin
theJerusalemandTelAvivcourts).
3) WhatisthefoundationinthelawforAttorneyBracha'sauthoritytorespondonrequests,
whichwerelawfullyfiledincourtcasesfordecisionsbythecorrespondingjudges?
Inherfirstletter,Brachafalselypresentsherlettertomeasaresponseonmyinquiry
whichneverexisted.Inhersecondletter,itappearsthatsheretractssuchfalseclaim,and
insteadrefersasinquirytomyrequests,whichwerelawfullyfiledinvariouscourtcases.
4) WhatisthemeaningofAttorneyBracha'sstatementinhersecondletter:Myresponsestill
stands?Whatistheresponse?Onwhatquestion?Underwhatauthorityandforwhat
purposedoesitstand?
5) WhatarethenamesandauthoritiesofthosewhotransferredforAttorneyBracha's
handlingrequests,whichwerelawfullyfiledinvariouscourtcases?
Inhersecondletter,Brachastates,thatarequest,whichwaslawfullyfiledincourtwas
transferredformyhandlinginthepassivevoice,concealingthenameandauthority
ofthosewhotransferred.
6) WhatisthemeaningofAttorneyBracha'sstatementinherfirstletter:Yourrequesttosee
postitdecisions?
Ihaveneveraskedtoseedecisions.Idulyfiledrequeststoinspectandtocopycourt
records(seebelow).
7) Whatarethenamesandpositions,andbywhomweretheappointmentsoftherelevant
authoritiesintheAdministrationofCourts,withwhomthematterwaspurportedly
reviewed,accordingtoBracha'sfirstletter,andwhopurportedlydetermined,regarding
seeing...postitdecisionsthematterisimpossiblefromcomputationalperspective?

1/4

Itshouldbenotedthatthisyear,aspartofanacademicstudy,Ihavefiledaseriesof
requeststoinspectcourtrecordsinvariouscriminalcourtfiles,mostofthemrelatedin
variouswaystocorruptionofgovernment.Thestudyaimstoexaminetheexercisein
practiceoftherighttoinspectcourtrecordsintheStateofIsraeltoday.Therequeststo
inspect,whichBrachareferstoinherletters,aremostlikelypartofsuchseries.
ThelawoftheStateofIsraelregardinginspectionofcourtdecisionsisclear:
RegulationsoftheCourtsInspectionofCourtFiles(2003),Article2(b)states:Every
personispermittedtoinspectdecisions,whicharenotprohibitedforpublicationbylaw.
JudgmentinpetitionTheAssociationforCivilRightsinIsraelvMinisterofJustice(High
CourtofJustice5917/97)declaresthatpublicaccesstocourtrecordsisafundamental
principleinademocraticregimeandaconstitutional,suprastatutoryright.Thesame
Judgmentalsoclarifiedtheexpectation,thatwithimplementationofNetHaMishpat(IT
systemofthecourts),decisionsandjudgmentswouldbeopenforinspectionbyevery
persononanongoingbasis,pursuanttothelimitsinthelaw.[underlineaddedjz]
TherighttoinspectcourtdecisionsisalsofoundedintheUniversalDeclarationofHuman
Rights,Article10,whichestablishestherightforfair,publichearing.
Therefore,itappearsthatAttorneyHeliBracha,aperson,whosepositionandauthorityare
sofaramystery,attemptsinherletterstoestablishanewlawintheStateofIsrael,andto
unlawfullydeprivearight,whichisafundamentalHumanRight,andaconstitutional,
suprastatutoryrightpursuanttothelawoftheStateofIsrael.
Needlesstosay,theopinion,whichAttorneyHeliBrachaistryingtoconvey,thatinspection
ofpostitdecisionsisimpossiblefromcomputationalperspective,isludicrousfrom
computationalperspective.
Inaseparateletter,IforwardforyourresponsetherecordofapostitdecisionbyJudge
DavidRoseninStateofIsraelvZernietal(102910112)theHolylandcorruptionscandal.
[1]Suchpostitdecisionappearsinboththepublicaccessdocketandthecourtdocket,
anditdemonstratesthatfromcomputationalperspectiveitispossibletoinspectpostit
decisions.However,suchcourtrecordisalsosuspectedfraudinitsownsake.
Moreover,theexistence,format,anduseofpostitdecisionswerepartoftheevidenceof
fraudinthedesign,implementationandoperationofNetHaMishpat(ITsystemofthe
districtandmagistratecourts),in:
SubmissiontotheUNHumanRightsCouncil,whichbecamepartoftheCouncil'sUPR
reportonHumanRightsinIsrael(2013),and
Academicpaper,whichwaspublished,pursuanttointernationalpeerreview,bythe
EuropeanConferenceonEgovernment(2015).
Thelattertworeportswereseparatelyforwardedforyourresponse.[2]
ThereisnodoubtthatAttorneyBracha'slettersandyourresponseonthismatterwouldbe
animportantpartofmyacademicstudyregardingpublicaccesstocourtrecordsinIsrael
today.
Truly,
JosephZernik,PhD
HumanRightsAlert(NGO)
OccupyTLV
Attached:(withEnglishtranslations)
1) July26,2015AttorneyHeliBrachaletter
2) July26,2015DrZernik'sresponsetoAttorneyHeliBracha

2/4

3) August3,2015AttorneyHeliBrachaletter

CC:
Activists,Israelicivilsocietyorganizations,scholarsinIsraelandabroad,Israelielectedand
governmentofficials.
LINKS:
[1] 2015-08-03 Court records in State of Israel v Zerni et al (10291-01-12) suspected fraud forwarded for
opinion of Director of the Courts Judge Spitzer //
' ) (10291-01-12

https://www.scribd.com/doc/273484015/
[2] 2015-07-28 Request for response by Director of the Israeli courts, Judge Spitzer, on lack of integrity, fraud
in IT systems //
,
https://www.scribd.com/doc/273296557/

_________________________________________________________________________
42015 ,


"MICHALTS@court.gov.il ,ronam@court.gov.il ,Pniyot@court.gov.il ,:
Dover@court.gov.il
:
.
14.
,
26 , 3
,2015 , " , :
(1 ? ?
,
.
(2 ?
)
(.
(3 " ?
" " "
. , ""
,
.
(4 " " : "? ?
? "?
(5 "
?
" , , " ..." -
, .
(6 " " : "?
" . ) (.
(7 , , " " ,
" , "" "
" ... "?

3/4

, ,
, ,
. " ,
.
:
) ,(2003 ) 2( " :
.
' ) (5917/97
" " " -" .
,
" "] . -[
, ,10
.
, " , ,
, " ,-"
.
" , " "
" " , " ".
, " "
' ) - (10291-01-12 [1] . ,
" " , ,,
" " . .
" , " , , , ,
, , " - " :
" ),(2013
,
)
.(2015
[2] .
"
.
,

'
Human Rights Alert - NGO
"
:
(1 " 26.2015 ,
(2 " 26.2015 ,
(3 " 3,2015 ,
:
, , , .
:
.

4/4

[Coast of Arms of the State of Israel]


ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS
Office of the Legal Adviser
July 26, 2015
Ref: 13310415
(In responding, please indicate Ref No.)
To:
Dr Joseph Zernik
PO Box 33407
Tel-Aviv
Also by fax: 077-3179186
Greetings:
RE: Your June 11, 2015 Request
Your inquiry, referenced above, was forwarded for my handling.
Regarding your request to see post-it decisions, the matter was reviewed with the relevant
authorities in the Administration of Courts, and the review concluded that the matter was not
possible from computational perspective.
Other matters, which were requested by you, namely, that the Court order the parties to serve
on you responses by the parties on your requests; that the Court order to provide sufficient time
for your reply; that the Court order that decisions be served on you, such matters are routinely
performed. Moreover, I am informed that your request was granted, and that you were
permitted to inspect the court file.
I hope that the above addresses your inquiry.
Respectfully,
Heli Bracha, Adv.
[hand signature]
The Legal Bureau
Copies:
Attorney Barak Laser, Legal Adviser to the court system
Ms Sima Saban, Chief Clerk, Jerusalem District Court
Kanfey Nesahrim St. 22, Jerusalem, 95464 Israel
Tel: 02-6556919; Fax: 02-6556887
E-mail: mishpatit@court.gov.il

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Joseph Zernik, PhD


"
PO Box 33407, Tel-Aviv, Israel
6133301 ",33407 "
Fax: 077-3179186 Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
[]

July26,2015
SharonSabanSafray
FOIAOfficer,AdministrationofCourts
Email:hofeshhamida@court.gov.il
RE:PerplexingletterfromtheAdministrationofCourts
Ref:Yournumber11310415

DearMsSafrai:
Ireceivedbyfaxtodaytheattachedletter,datedJuly26,2015,byAttorneyHeli
Bracha.Theletterisperplexingonseveralaccounts:
a)AttorneyHeliBrachafailstoindicateherpositionintheStateService.TheLegal
Bureauisnotapositionortitle.AsfarasIamconcerned,lettersbygovernment
employees,whofailtoindicatetheirpositionandauthority,areinherently
defective,andsuspectedasfraud.
b)Thefaxtransmissionwasconductedfromanunidentifiedfaxmachine,mostlikely
notthevalidfaxserveroftheAdministrationofCourts.Iamnotfamiliarwiththe
Israelilawinthismatter.However,inotherjurisdictions,faxtransmissionsfrom
anunidentifiedmachineinlegalandbusinessmattersaredeemedinherently
invalidforlackofauthentication,andsuspectedasfraud.
c)IhavenocluewhatinquiryAttorneyHeliBracharefersto,whenshewritesabout
yourinquiry.Reviewofmyrecordsindicatesthatmycommunicationswiththe
AdministrationofCourtsinrecentmonthswereallasformalFreedomof
Informationrequests.Onsuchrequests,forwhichIdulypaidthefees,Iexpecta
formalFreedomofInformationresponses,signedbytheFOIAOfficerofthe
AdministrationofCourts.
d)IhavenocluewhatAttorneyHeliBracharefersto,whenshewritesaboutaPost
itdecision,butapparentlysheistryingtopresentclaimsfromcomputing
perspective,whichlackincredibility,regardingITsystems.
e)IhavenocluewhatAttorneyHeliBracharefersto,whenshewritesabouta
remainingissues,possiblyrelatedtoaRequesttoInspectacourtfile,forwhich
shefailstoprovidethereference.Overthepastyear,Ihavefilednumerous
requeststoinspectcourtfilesinthevariouscourts,aspartofanacademicsurvey
ofpublicaccesstocourtrecordsintheIsraelicourts.However,suchrequests
surelyhaveneverbeenaddressedtotheAdministrationofCourts.
Insum:
Incasethecommunication,referencedabove,isanauthenticcommunicationbythe
AdministrationofCourts,IwouldbegratefulifAttorneyHeliBrachasendmea
correctedletter,wheresheclearlyindicatesherposition,writesinalegiblemanner,
clearlyreferstothematterssheisaddressing,andindicatingherauthorityineach
suchmatter.
1/3

IncaseIreceivenocorrectedletterfromAttorneyBrachawithin14days,Iwould
dismissthecommunication,referencedabove,asinherentlyvoidforlackofauthority
andvalidity.
Truly,
_________________
JosephZernik,PhD
)HumanRightsAlert(NGO
P.S.
PleaseforwardcopiesofinstantcommunicationtoAttorneyBarakLaser,Legal
AdvisorfortheAdministrationofCourts,andMsSimaSaban,ChiefClerkofthe
JerusalemDistrictCourt,whowerecopiedonthecommunicationbyAttorneyHeli
Bracha.
___________________
262015,

,
"hofeshhamida@court.gov.il:
:.
:11310415
',
,26,2015,".
:
("."
.,,,
.
(,
.,
,
,.
(""".

.,
,,
.
(""",
"".
(""",
,.
,
.,
.
:
2/3

,"
,,
,,
,.
"14,
.
,

________________
'
HumanRightsAlertNGO
..
",
,,,,
".

3/3


ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS

Office Of the Legal Adviser


" ,"
3 2015
14178615 :
) '(

"
"33407 :
6133301 ,
"joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org :
,
: ' 26.7.15
: 26.7.15
26.7.15
11.6.15

,11.6.15 "
10 ,"2015 , ,
.26.7.2015
.
,
,"

:
" , ,;
' , ,;
' , , .
' 22 95464
Kanfey Nesharim st. 22, Jerusalem, 95464, Israel
' 02- 6556919 :02-6556887 :
- E-mail: mishpatit@court.gov.il "

[Coast of Arms of the State of Israel]


ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS
Office of the Legal Adviser
August 3, 2015
Ref: 14178615
(In responding, please indicate Ref No.)
To:
Dr Joseph Zernik
PO Box 33407
Tel-Aviv
Also by email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
Greetings:
RE: Reply on your July 26, 2015 inquiry on Ms Saban-Safrai
Ref: Your July 26, 2015 inquiry on the Freedom of Information Officer
My July 26, 2015 response
Your June 11, 2015 inquiry on the Tel-Aviv District Court
Your June 11, 2015 inquiry on the Tel-Aviv District Court, referenced above, titled: Request
for due process in my June 10, 2015 Request to Inspect, was forwarded by the Court for my
handling, and accordingly, my July 27, 2015 response to you.
My reply still stands.

Respectfully,
Heli Bracha, Adv.
[hand signature]
The Legal Bureau
Copies:
Attorney Barak Laser, Legal Adviser to the court system
Ms Sima Saban, Chief Clerk, Jerusalem District Court
Kanfey Nesahrim St. 22, Jerusalem, 95464 Israel
Tel: 02-6556919; Fax: 02-6556887
E-mail: mishpatit@court.gov.il

Potrebbero piacerti anche