Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
"
6133301 ",33407 "
Email: joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org
[]
August4,2015
JudgeMichaelSpitzer
Director,AdministrationofCourts
Byemail:MICHALTS@court.gov.il,ronam@court.gov.il,Pniyot@court.gov.il,
Dover@court.gov.il
RE:Requestforclarificationsregardinglettersfromyouroffice,pertainingtoIT
systemsofthecourts,suspectedasfraud.
Yourresponsewithin14daysiskindlyrequested.
DearJudgeSpitzer:
Ihereinrequestyourclarificationregardingthequestionsbelow,pertainingtotheattached
July26andAugust3,2015lettersbyAttorneyHeliBrachafromtheAdministrationof
Courts,whicharesuspectedfraud:
1) WhatarethepositiontitleandauthorityofAttorneyHeliBrachaintheAdministrationof
Courts?Whowassheappointedby?
Brachafailedtoindicateherpositioninhersignaturesontheletters,andalsofailedto
providesuchdata,evenaftertheexplicitrequestinmyJuly26,2015response.
2) WhatarethecaptionsandfilenumbersofthecourtcasesthatAttorneyBracharefersto?
Brachafailedtoprovidesuchdataevenaftermyexplicitrequest(apparentlycasesbothin
theJerusalemandTelAvivcourts).
3) WhatisthefoundationinthelawforAttorneyBracha'sauthoritytorespondonrequests,
whichwerelawfullyfiledincourtcasesfordecisionsbythecorrespondingjudges?
Inherfirstletter,Brachafalselypresentsherlettertomeasaresponseonmyinquiry
whichneverexisted.Inhersecondletter,itappearsthatsheretractssuchfalseclaim,and
insteadrefersasinquirytomyrequests,whichwerelawfullyfiledinvariouscourtcases.
4) WhatisthemeaningofAttorneyBracha'sstatementinhersecondletter:Myresponsestill
stands?Whatistheresponse?Onwhatquestion?Underwhatauthorityandforwhat
purposedoesitstand?
5) WhatarethenamesandauthoritiesofthosewhotransferredforAttorneyBracha's
handlingrequests,whichwerelawfullyfiledinvariouscourtcases?
Inhersecondletter,Brachastates,thatarequest,whichwaslawfullyfiledincourtwas
transferredformyhandlinginthepassivevoice,concealingthenameandauthority
ofthosewhotransferred.
6) WhatisthemeaningofAttorneyBracha'sstatementinherfirstletter:Yourrequesttosee
postitdecisions?
Ihaveneveraskedtoseedecisions.Idulyfiledrequeststoinspectandtocopycourt
records(seebelow).
7) Whatarethenamesandpositions,andbywhomweretheappointmentsoftherelevant
authoritiesintheAdministrationofCourts,withwhomthematterwaspurportedly
reviewed,accordingtoBracha'sfirstletter,andwhopurportedlydetermined,regarding
seeing...postitdecisionsthematterisimpossiblefromcomputationalperspective?
1/4
Itshouldbenotedthatthisyear,aspartofanacademicstudy,Ihavefiledaseriesof
requeststoinspectcourtrecordsinvariouscriminalcourtfiles,mostofthemrelatedin
variouswaystocorruptionofgovernment.Thestudyaimstoexaminetheexercisein
practiceoftherighttoinspectcourtrecordsintheStateofIsraeltoday.Therequeststo
inspect,whichBrachareferstoinherletters,aremostlikelypartofsuchseries.
ThelawoftheStateofIsraelregardinginspectionofcourtdecisionsisclear:
RegulationsoftheCourtsInspectionofCourtFiles(2003),Article2(b)states:Every
personispermittedtoinspectdecisions,whicharenotprohibitedforpublicationbylaw.
JudgmentinpetitionTheAssociationforCivilRightsinIsraelvMinisterofJustice(High
CourtofJustice5917/97)declaresthatpublicaccesstocourtrecordsisafundamental
principleinademocraticregimeandaconstitutional,suprastatutoryright.Thesame
Judgmentalsoclarifiedtheexpectation,thatwithimplementationofNetHaMishpat(IT
systemofthecourts),decisionsandjudgmentswouldbeopenforinspectionbyevery
persononanongoingbasis,pursuanttothelimitsinthelaw.[underlineaddedjz]
TherighttoinspectcourtdecisionsisalsofoundedintheUniversalDeclarationofHuman
Rights,Article10,whichestablishestherightforfair,publichearing.
Therefore,itappearsthatAttorneyHeliBracha,aperson,whosepositionandauthorityare
sofaramystery,attemptsinherletterstoestablishanewlawintheStateofIsrael,andto
unlawfullydeprivearight,whichisafundamentalHumanRight,andaconstitutional,
suprastatutoryrightpursuanttothelawoftheStateofIsrael.
Needlesstosay,theopinion,whichAttorneyHeliBrachaistryingtoconvey,thatinspection
ofpostitdecisionsisimpossiblefromcomputationalperspective,isludicrousfrom
computationalperspective.
Inaseparateletter,IforwardforyourresponsetherecordofapostitdecisionbyJudge
DavidRoseninStateofIsraelvZernietal(102910112)theHolylandcorruptionscandal.
[1]Suchpostitdecisionappearsinboththepublicaccessdocketandthecourtdocket,
anditdemonstratesthatfromcomputationalperspectiveitispossibletoinspectpostit
decisions.However,suchcourtrecordisalsosuspectedfraudinitsownsake.
Moreover,theexistence,format,anduseofpostitdecisionswerepartoftheevidenceof
fraudinthedesign,implementationandoperationofNetHaMishpat(ITsystemofthe
districtandmagistratecourts),in:
SubmissiontotheUNHumanRightsCouncil,whichbecamepartoftheCouncil'sUPR
reportonHumanRightsinIsrael(2013),and
Academicpaper,whichwaspublished,pursuanttointernationalpeerreview,bythe
EuropeanConferenceonEgovernment(2015).
Thelattertworeportswereseparatelyforwardedforyourresponse.[2]
ThereisnodoubtthatAttorneyBracha'slettersandyourresponseonthismatterwouldbe
animportantpartofmyacademicstudyregardingpublicaccesstocourtrecordsinIsrael
today.
Truly,
JosephZernik,PhD
HumanRightsAlert(NGO)
OccupyTLV
Attached:(withEnglishtranslations)
1) July26,2015AttorneyHeliBrachaletter
2) July26,2015DrZernik'sresponsetoAttorneyHeliBracha
2/4
3) August3,2015AttorneyHeliBrachaletter
CC:
Activists,Israelicivilsocietyorganizations,scholarsinIsraelandabroad,Israelielectedand
governmentofficials.
LINKS:
[1] 2015-08-03 Court records in State of Israel v Zerni et al (10291-01-12) suspected fraud forwarded for
opinion of Director of the Courts Judge Spitzer //
' ) (10291-01-12
https://www.scribd.com/doc/273484015/
[2] 2015-07-28 Request for response by Director of the Israeli courts, Judge Spitzer, on lack of integrity, fraud
in IT systems //
,
https://www.scribd.com/doc/273296557/
_________________________________________________________________________
42015 ,
"MICHALTS@court.gov.il ,ronam@court.gov.il ,Pniyot@court.gov.il ,:
Dover@court.gov.il
:
.
14.
,
26 , 3
,2015 , " , :
(1 ? ?
,
.
(2 ?
)
(.
(3 " ?
" " "
. , ""
,
.
(4 " " : "? ?
? "?
(5 "
?
" , , " ..." -
, .
(6 " " : "?
" . ) (.
(7 , , " " ,
" , "" "
" ... "?
3/4
, ,
, ,
. " ,
.
:
) ,(2003 ) 2( " :
.
' ) (5917/97
" " " -" .
,
" "] . -[
, ,10
.
, " , ,
, " ,-"
.
" , " "
" " , " ".
, " "
' ) - (10291-01-12 [1] . ,
" " , ,,
" " . .
" , " , , , ,
, , " - " :
" ),(2013
,
)
.(2015
[2] .
"
.
,
'
Human Rights Alert - NGO
"
:
(1 " 26.2015 ,
(2 " 26.2015 ,
(3 " 3,2015 ,
:
, , , .
:
.
4/4
July26,2015
SharonSabanSafray
FOIAOfficer,AdministrationofCourts
Email:hofeshhamida@court.gov.il
RE:PerplexingletterfromtheAdministrationofCourts
Ref:Yournumber11310415
DearMsSafrai:
Ireceivedbyfaxtodaytheattachedletter,datedJuly26,2015,byAttorneyHeli
Bracha.Theletterisperplexingonseveralaccounts:
a)AttorneyHeliBrachafailstoindicateherpositionintheStateService.TheLegal
Bureauisnotapositionortitle.AsfarasIamconcerned,lettersbygovernment
employees,whofailtoindicatetheirpositionandauthority,areinherently
defective,andsuspectedasfraud.
b)Thefaxtransmissionwasconductedfromanunidentifiedfaxmachine,mostlikely
notthevalidfaxserveroftheAdministrationofCourts.Iamnotfamiliarwiththe
Israelilawinthismatter.However,inotherjurisdictions,faxtransmissionsfrom
anunidentifiedmachineinlegalandbusinessmattersaredeemedinherently
invalidforlackofauthentication,andsuspectedasfraud.
c)IhavenocluewhatinquiryAttorneyHeliBracharefersto,whenshewritesabout
yourinquiry.Reviewofmyrecordsindicatesthatmycommunicationswiththe
AdministrationofCourtsinrecentmonthswereallasformalFreedomof
Informationrequests.Onsuchrequests,forwhichIdulypaidthefees,Iexpecta
formalFreedomofInformationresponses,signedbytheFOIAOfficerofthe
AdministrationofCourts.
d)IhavenocluewhatAttorneyHeliBracharefersto,whenshewritesaboutaPost
itdecision,butapparentlysheistryingtopresentclaimsfromcomputing
perspective,whichlackincredibility,regardingITsystems.
e)IhavenocluewhatAttorneyHeliBracharefersto,whenshewritesabouta
remainingissues,possiblyrelatedtoaRequesttoInspectacourtfile,forwhich
shefailstoprovidethereference.Overthepastyear,Ihavefilednumerous
requeststoinspectcourtfilesinthevariouscourts,aspartofanacademicsurvey
ofpublicaccesstocourtrecordsintheIsraelicourts.However,suchrequests
surelyhaveneverbeenaddressedtotheAdministrationofCourts.
Insum:
Incasethecommunication,referencedabove,isanauthenticcommunicationbythe
AdministrationofCourts,IwouldbegratefulifAttorneyHeliBrachasendmea
correctedletter,wheresheclearlyindicatesherposition,writesinalegiblemanner,
clearlyreferstothematterssheisaddressing,andindicatingherauthorityineach
suchmatter.
1/3
IncaseIreceivenocorrectedletterfromAttorneyBrachawithin14days,Iwould
dismissthecommunication,referencedabove,asinherentlyvoidforlackofauthority
andvalidity.
Truly,
_________________
JosephZernik,PhD
)HumanRightsAlert(NGO
P.S.
PleaseforwardcopiesofinstantcommunicationtoAttorneyBarakLaser,Legal
AdvisorfortheAdministrationofCourts,andMsSimaSaban,ChiefClerkofthe
JerusalemDistrictCourt,whowerecopiedonthecommunicationbyAttorneyHeli
Bracha.
___________________
262015,
,
"hofeshhamida@court.gov.il:
:.
:11310415
',
,26,2015,".
:
("."
.,,,
.
(,
.,
,
,.
(""".
.,
,,
.
(""",
"".
(""",
,.
,
.,
.
:
2/3
,"
,,
,,
,.
"14,
.
,
________________
'
HumanRightsAlertNGO
..
",
,,,,
".
3/3
ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS
"
"33407 :
6133301 ,
"joseph.zernik@hra-ngo.org :
,
: ' 26.7.15
: 26.7.15
26.7.15
11.6.15
,11.6.15 "
10 ,"2015 , ,
.26.7.2015
.
,
,"
:
" , ,;
' , ,;
' , , .
' 22 95464
Kanfey Nesharim st. 22, Jerusalem, 95464, Israel
' 02- 6556919 :02-6556887 :
- E-mail: mishpatit@court.gov.il "
Respectfully,
Heli Bracha, Adv.
[hand signature]
The Legal Bureau
Copies:
Attorney Barak Laser, Legal Adviser to the court system
Ms Sima Saban, Chief Clerk, Jerusalem District Court
Kanfey Nesahrim St. 22, Jerusalem, 95464 Israel
Tel: 02-6556919; Fax: 02-6556887
E-mail: mishpatit@court.gov.il