Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Swedish Issaquah, a 350,000 ft2 (32 500 m2) hospital located in Issaquah, Wash.,
uses a hydronic heat recovery system to achieve a 50% energy savings compared
to an average hospital in the Pacific Northwest. After I wrote an article (June 2013
ASHRAE Journal) about the hospital last year, readers asked about using exhaust air
for heat recovery in hospitals, and about comparing exhaust air for direct air-to-air
heat recovery versus chilled water to recover heat from the exhaust air for use in a
hydronic heat recovery system using a heat recovery chiller.
This article seeks to answer the questions I received,
describe the advantages of hydronic heat recovery, and
provide design considerations regarding hydronic heat
recovery design. While this article is meant to address
general concepts of heat recovery in health care, data
from Swedish Issaquah will be used for examples to
illustrate concepts.
For the purposes of this article, hydronic heat recovery
refers to building level hydronic systems (chilled water
and heating water systems). This should not be confused
with the hydronics of a runaround loop air-to-air heat
recovery system.
Heat demand in a hospital can be grouped into three
general categories; central ventilation heating, envelope
losses, and zone air tempering due to minimum airflow
requirements. Air-handling unit heating coils serve
Jeremy McClanathan, P.E., is senior energy analyst at CDi+Mazetti in Seattle. He is an ASHRAE certified Building Energy Modeling Professional and a Healthcare Facility Design Professional.
24
A S H R A E J O U R N A L ashrae.org J U N E 2014
TECHNICAL FEATURE
This article was published in ASHRAE Journal, June 2014. Copyright 2014 ASHRAE. Posted at www.ashrae.org. This article may not be copied and/or distributed
electronically or in paper form without permission of ASHRAE. For more information about ASHRAE Journal, visit www.ashrae.org.
25
TECHNICAL FEATURE
26
A S H R A E J O U R N A L ashrae.org J U N E 2014
Load (MBH)
Load (Tons)
TECHNICAL FEATURE
58F Chilled
Water Return
VFD
Variable Flow
Chilled Water
Pumps
Results
Trend data from 2013 shows that
93% of heating energy was served
by the heat recovery chiller with an
average heating only COP of 4.0. The
energy use intensity (EUI) for the past
two years has been 112 kBtu/ft2yr
(353 kWh/m2yr), and the heat recovery system saves the hospital approximately $120,000/yr. While EUI reductions similar to that seen at Swedish
Issaquah may likely be seen in any
hospital project that has an opportunity to design a similar system,
the economic benefits depend on
the local price of natural gas, electric
rates and demand charge structures.
Careful analysis using local utility
rates to determine project specific
economic benefits is recommended.
Cooler
530 Ton
300 Ton Heat Recovery ChillerVariable
Chiller Dual Compressor Speed Screw
Machine
Screw Machine
(3 Typical)
Condenser
Condenser Heating
Capacity is 4,520 MBH
Pump (Typical)
Variable Flow
Heating
Water Pumps
120F
Heating
Water
Supply
Existing Buildings
VFD
Heating Coils in
Air-Handling Units
100F Heating
Water Return
A S H R A E J O U R N A L ashrae.org J U N E 2014