AVIATION INVESTIGATION : FINAL REPORT OF EVENTS ~

Malaysian Airlines MAS370 : MH370 : Boeing B772 : 9M-MRO

Date of Incident : 3-08-2014
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Beijing, China. P.O.B 227 : Crew 12 : Total 239
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Malaysian Airlines MAS17 : MH17 : Boeing B772 : 9M-MRD**

Date of Incident : 7-17-2014
Amsterdam, Netherlands - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. P.O.B 283 : Crew 15 : Total 298
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GermanWings GWI18G : GW-4U-9525 : Airbus A322

Date of Incident : 3-24-2015
Barcelona, Spain Dsseldorf, Germany. P.O.B : 144 : Crew 06 : Total 150
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Date of Report : 7-27-2015

Prepared by The Shadow
** This is the airframe that was claimed to be servicing MH17.
Evidence obtained conclusively proves that the airframe of 9M-MRO,
[which serviced MH370,] was used for servicing MH17.

Page 1 of 18

SUMMARY OF MALAYSIAN AIRLINES MAS370/MH370/9M-MRO ~

Disappearance of Aircraft Investigation Notes ~
Date of Preparation ~ July 27 2015
Aircraft departure as per protocol and on-time.
FlightRadar24 data shows erratic, frequent Military-style
directional and altitudinal anomalies off coast of Malaysia at
FL350. [Flight Level 350.] Two fast moving unidentified targets in
immediate vicinity of MH370. I believe these were Military
Fighter Jets despatched to intercept and commandeer MH370 to
Diego Garcia. The NZ Herald reported three weeks after the
disappearance of MH370 that the aircraft had performed a series
of Military style manoeuvres that were pronounced, and for which
would not be within the capacity and training of a commercial
Pilot to perform. There would accordingly have to have been
intervention by Military Personnel.
MH370 executed a left turn at immediate point of ATC handover.
No communication with Vietnam ATC. VATC reports MH370
unaccounted for 17 mins after comms should have occurred.
Search & Rescue teams not activated until app 5hrs later,
claiming darkness as the reason for deferral.
Initial search focuses to the East for app 9 days. Chinese produce
photo claiming it is wreckage of MH370. Oil slick detected on
South China Sea and investigated. Proves to be not from an
aircraft. Chinese later admit photo was Stock Files and not
MH370.
Those awaiting arrival of MH370 given minimal information and
rapidly removed to a nearby hotel. Placed in a locked room with
heavy security posted outside.
Information from Authorities is vague and sporadic and reveals
little information of any significance or comfort.
Authorities announce pings from MH370 detected in a westerly
direction. Search moves to Southern Indian Ocean and relocates
multiple times. No wreckage or associated items located.
Local Villagers hear sound of loud screaming aircraft engines
app 0100hrs at Marang, located in North West Malaysia. It is
south of Sultan Mahmud International Airport. My investigations
show no hangers or suitable storage facilities for a B772. Villagers
filed report to Malaysian Police 1030hrs. Information passed to
Malaysian Military to investigate. We hear nothing further and
little is mentioned of this event.

Page 2 of 18

MH370 is detected flying over the South West Coast of Malaysia,

crossing over Kawalagi International Airport. This is briefly
mentioned in MSM. Reports that aircraft may have diverted due
to fire on board. This is unlikely because
o Aircraft did not file a Pan or Mayday communication.
o No alerts issued of any type. Not consistent with genuine
emergency event.
o No reason to completely change direction in an emergency.
o Aircraft crossed over TWO International Airports without
filing a distress call or making any attempt to land.
Pilot suicide is ruled out. Aircraft could have been flown directly
into sea from FL350 without need to fly hours off course in wrong
direction, creating extreme likelihood of detection. Captain was
of sound mind and had commented to a friend before flight that
he was looking forward to going shopping on his return. Not likely
the words from a suicidal Pilot.
Inference made to MH370 climbing to FL420, stalling and diving
into sea. Possible but ruled out no wreckage detected Aircraft
positively identified by Civilians at a waypoint after this location.
Reports from persons on ground awaiting flight arrival of
cellphones of passengers ringing. Discounted by Authorities as
being ringing tone, whilst telephone exchange attempting to
locate handsets. If cellphone off it will go to messaging or give a
recorded message that handset is off or outside coverage area.
Authorities claim cellphones wont operate over 7,000ft. My
investigations show firm evidence of a cellphone ringing aboard a
B763 at FL390. Questioning of pax reveals Flight & Cabin crew
have their cellphones switched on during flights and can
send/receive voice calls and sms.
Evidence states two successive cellular calls made from Flight
Deck of MH370 from Co-Pilots handset. Call one connected to
called number, then terminated. Second attempt registered with
a Cell site Tower in Penang, near route diverted flight took.
Cellular Service Provider refused to supply data pertaining to
calls.
Thai Military detects two fast moving objects on a South
Westerly trajectory, opposing and prior to MH370 passing
through same airspace. Reports made by two civilians of what
appeared to be an aircraft on fire. One person stationed on an Oil
Rig; One solo sailing off west coast of Australia. Both stated fires
looked unusual and of an orange colour. I believe they saw the
afterburners of two military fighter jets on route to intercept
MH370. Thai Military did not report these events until four days
Page 3 of 18

after MH370 reported missing. They stated they were not

concerned as the objects detected were not in/near their airspace
and as such were not an immediate threat to their country.
Boeing B772 airliners have two transponders and one ACARS
system, located in the Electrics & Electronics Bay [E/E Bay,]
external of flight deck and below floor of forward galley. Accessed
via hatch. This houses the entire brains of the aircraft and
where access would need to be made to disengage appropriate
units/circuits. Both Airbus and Boeing have Uninterruptable
Auto-Pilot systems installed. [Referred to as BUAP & AUAP] This
system does not allow flight crew to over-ride it. Is installed
intentionally to take external control of a flight in the case of
fire, emergency or terrorist situation. It is accessed via the
ground and takes the control of the aircraft out of the Pilots
control and cannot be over-ridden. MH370, and GermanWings 4U
9525 are both believed to have been hijacked via this method.
Multiple Persons of interest/value were on-board MH370.
Twenty from Freescale Semiconductor which is located in Austin
Texas, USA. It is owned by The Carlyle Group and is owned by
Lord Jacob Rothschild. He is named on a patent for a micro-chip,
along with the four inventors, who were claimed to be aboard but
whose names do not appear on the Pax manifest. The patent for
this microchip was filed on December 22 2012 and approved on
March 11 3 days after MH370 went missing [Read: hijacked.] If
any named benefactors are deceased or presumed deceased
beyond reasonable doubt, the proceeds of same document are
dispersed amongst the surviving benefactors. This Microchip is
the
worlds
smallest
and
most
advanced.
Whichever
Country/Military has possession has ultimate advantage over its
opponents. Twenty other cyber-spy, military systems engineers,
Company Executives, etc were aboard MH370 from Companies
such as Huawei, ZTE, IBM and other Companies of significance.
The microchip is known as the KL Kinetis 03, invented in
Freescales facilities in Kuala Lumpur and on-route to their
testing facilities in Beijing, China. The prototype was aboard
MH370. My investigations into this microchip in early 2015 by
accessing Freescales website, shows the product available for
purchase and receiving a design award in 2014. Quite feasible,
given that MH370 went missing March 2014; however this would
require the inventors to be alive to produce the product. I believe
they were.
Pings detected in Bay of Bengal. Confirmed by search teams after
their searching in the Southern Indian Ocean. I believe this to be
Page 4 of 18

where the B772 headed to perform a wide turn for line-up at its
intended destination.
Sighting made of low-flying aircraft matching Malaysian B772
description by fishermen in the Maldives at app 0615hrs. The
time is consistent with time zone changes and distance and
flying time lapsed. Witnesses claim aircraft flying lower than
normal. Engines were screaming. The engines would most likely
be at full power settings due to the thicker air at lower altitudes,
combined with flaps configured to maximum extraction, essential
for MH370 to remain airborne. My investigations concur with the
reports from these witnesses. I believe they positively identified
MH370 on final approach for Diego Garcia Military Installation
located on an Atoll to the South after crossing the Chagos
Archipelagos. The size and colours were consistent. Aircraft was
reported as a B747; however, given these witnesses were viewing
from the sea, and with 747 and 777 aircraft being of similar
dimensions, could easily be mistaken. These reports were
mentioned by Malaysian Authorities at a Press Conference and
dismissed with the statement.... We have had a report of an
aircraft matching the description of MH370, however these
people wouldnt know what they saw, as such are not credible
witnesses, and we are not reading anything into it.
Diego Garcia is a very closely guarded Military Installation
located in the Southern Indian Ocean, and in the vicinity of
where search patterns were conducted in an effort to locate
MH370. It is occupied by American and Israeli Personnel and has
been leased and occupied since 1974. It stores nuclear weapons
and services ships and submarines in the region. It has undersea
facilities large enough to store B52 Bomber aircraft and a prison
which housed some prisoners from the Afghanistan and Israeli
wars. The islands native residents were shipped off the Atoll and
relocated to Mauritius and Seychelles and refused access to
return. Confidential documents which are located in the UK
clearly state the only other living things on this Atoll are to be
Seagulls. This is witnessed in a 60mins report.
March 08 2015 ~ Evidence conclusively proves MH370 was landed
automatically via remote hacking and brought to a standstill in
the centre of the runway. The final co-ordinates from MH370
ACARS system trace back to a large hanger located to the south
on the Atoll and large enough to house a B772 aircraft. A blank
photo taken by the IBM executive aboard was sent to his female
partner. The GPS ingrained coordinates point to the precise
location of this hanger. All personnel leave was cancelled
Page 5 of 18

effective the morning of March 08 2014. All movements to and

from the Atoll were embargoed. Any personnel who needed to
depart were told to take their personal possessions and sufficient
funds to facilitate their return to their home station in the USA.
The reason given was that they might not be returning to the
Atoll.
A requisition was filed for a Container ship this same morning.
According to a report from a previous military person who was
stationed on the Atoll, the coding on used was for the
transportation of people/personnel. The Ocean Shield set sail
for DG Atoll the morning of this requisition. The same morning
MH370 went missing. My investigations uncovered a copy of this
requisition form which had a link to take for further information.
Upon accessing this link a tab opened on my computer screen
with a Log-in and Password request in the centre of a black and
otherwise blank page, except for the words United States of
America and immediately below, Department of Defence.
These were positioned at the top of the screen.
Prince William and Kate flew into the Maldives on the morning of
March 08 2014 for purposes of William participating in two S&R
exercises involving five nations and in the immediate area of the
search region of MH370. Why did they not offer their services and
facilities? Aircraft flew from West Australia for five hours with
sufficient fuel reserves for a two hour search before returning to
Australia. A TV3 News printed article made reference to these two
exercises being conducted at the time. My belief is these
exercises were set up with the intention of supervising the zone
to ensure search teams did not get near areas of seclusion.
The search area of where MH370 was eventually claimed to
have crashed was extremely remote, subject to extremes of
weather and sea conditions, and is an area not traversed by
commercial flights for these reasons, and due to patchy and poor
radio communications. It should be noted that no wreckage has
ever washed up on any coast. This seems extremely unusual given
the strong currents flowing through this region.
A specialist satellite was brought in from China in an attempt to
locate MH370. This seems most odd, considering the nature of
news reports via live feeds with todays technology. Recently it
was announced that a submersible device had detected and taken
photos of a ships anchor in the same area MH370 was being
searched for. Yet, we were told they could not access the sea floor
due to the geographical nature of terrain and depth.
Page 6 of 18

In the early months of 2015 a statement was made that We are

confident of locating the wreckage of MH370 by the time we call
the search off at the end of May. This has not occurred and to
my knowledge the search is continuing. I am questioning how
this statement can confidently be made when the search has
been underway for nearly 18 months. The only way this
statement could be made is if they already know where the
wreckage is, or where it is to be located after being placed there.
My belief is that the search exercise is in essence a public pacifier
to make it appear they are seriously trying to locate MH370, and
that the search has been stretched out for the purpose of delay
tactics and to attempt to validate the difficult task and logistics
of the search efforts.
The ACARS system continued to transmit pings via satellite every
hour as to the location of MH370 and was something not factored
into the equation with those responsible for this incident. Most
airlines lease their engines from Boeing. This is because the
engines are the most expensive part of an aircraft, costing $20M
each. Accordingly, Boeing monitors the performance of these
engines via information pinged to them by the engines. This
information pertains to oil usage, fuel consumption, any
maintenance aspects or concerns, amongst other data. It is my
belief Boeing knew where MH370 was and where it was heading.
The CIA and NSA most likely also know more than they have
revealed.
It is my belief that some of the wreckage of MH370 will be
conveniently located and retrieved at some stage in the near
future, in an attempt to obtain closure on this conspiracy.
My investigations concur with other Investigators that the events
of MH370 and MH17 are directly linked, and that the same
aircraft [9M-MRO] was used to service MH17 in another
conspiracy. A report on this subsequent event follows.
---- ENDS ----

Page 7 of 18

SUMMARY OF MALAYSIAN AIRLINES MAS17/MH17/9M-MRD ~

Downing of Aircraft Facts & Investigation Notes ~
Date of Preparation ~ July 27 2015
Less than five months after the incident involving MH370, MH 17
is allegedly brought down by BUK missile, into a tightly guarded
at war region of Ukraine. This area is occupied by Pro-Russian
Extremists.
It has been noted that app 100 top AIDS scientists were on their
way to a conference in Australia, aboard MH17 via Kuala Lumpur.
Whether this factors into reasons for the MH17 incident is
unknown by me at this stage.
I have viewed an English subtitled Russian BBC TV item which
interviewed Villagers in the immediate area where MH17 was
taken down. Their accounts of what happened were as follows.
BUK missile launching was being undertaken in the vicinity of the
location in which media claimed it was launched. They claim that
it was common to see Ukrainian SU25 Military Fighter Jets
shadowing any aircraft passing overhead. This activity was
observed the day MH17 was shot down. Residents reported seeing
the jets firing on the Malaysian aircraft and that it was not
impacted by a BUK, or indeed any device launched from the
ground. Photographs presented to MSM clearly show a Ukrainian
jet firing 30mm rounds from a wings level position. This evidence
was obtained by a satellite but was discounted by Ukrainian
Officials as not being of the SU25 alleged to have been involved in
the taking down of MH17. Upon examination of the satellite black
and white image it is clearly evident there is no way of positively
identifying the jet because there are no visible indicators since
the photo is taken from ABOVE the SU25. The GPS co-ordinates
combined with date and time stamp should be sufficient evidence
to affirm or negate just whose fighter jet this was and to confirm
where and when the image was taken. My investigations prove
that a device was activated from the ground but did not strike
the Malaysian aircraft. The video footage which I have viewed
clearly shows the right engine on fire and the aircraft descending
in a controlled, wings-level trajectory of app 45degrees. There
were no explosions noticed until the aircraft impacted the
ground. The MSM video footage showed an explosion with a large
black plume of smoke. My observation was that this footage was
Page 8 of 18

taken at quite some considerable distance and I question whether

or not the film crew could not gain access closer to the area;
regardless, they most likely would have lenses with them to
obtain closer footage. So, who didnt want any close-up footage
being made available to the world?!
The video footage shows silver round flecks in the smoke, along with
vertical aluminium streaks with a resemblance in structure of
descending party streamers. This is known as Chaff and is a product
dispersed from Fighter Jets to deflect any heat seeking missiles. [Also
called window. Military strips of metal foil dropped by an aircraft to confuse enemy radar by
creating false blips.] Reference: http://dictionary.com
Footage taken at the crash site shows a large blackened impacted
area of ground. Close to the proximity are bodies. These are
intact with no visual signs of decapitations, burns, blood, or other
such injuries of any nature. They are still fully clothed. Video
footage taken shows a plastic bag with a sizeable number of
passports. These passports are in as-new unblemished
condition. There are no burn marks or damage. Some of the
passports are opened to the holders information inside cover
page. The information is clearly readable. The three names I
observed all concurred with the Pax manifest. This manifest was
especially difficult to locate in any non-corrupted readable
version and took app four attempts to retrieve after trying
different sources.
My investigation poses the question of how those passports and
bodies were in such pristine condition after having descended to
earth from FL320 and observing a blackened charred mess of the
aircraft within meters.
A Russian Commander who was one of the first to access the
crash site made observations that the blood had been sucked out
of the bodies, the people were deceased prior to boarding MH17
and the level of decomposition was in excess of that which would
be expected from decomposing bodies in the lapsed timeframe
from the crash to his arrival on site. My investigations lead to the
conclusion that these bodies were most likely have been Pax off
MH370, and were in cargo for the purposes of intentional disposal
using MH17 as the platform to execute this intention. Once
again, I reiterate the nature of the footage which was available for
presentation to the world via MSM.
The two Ukrainian SU25 Fighter Jets shadowed MH17 just behind
and below the B772, with one on the left and one on the right.
Malaysian Flight MH17 wreckage clearly shows multiple 30mm
Page 9 of 18

diameter rounds impacting and piercing the flight deck region on

both sides of the fuselage. This is the same ammunition used by
SU25 Fighter Jets and explains why the plane descended in a
controlled manner rather than via an explosion. The photographic
evidence I observed shows metal tearing of an inward trajectory.
This validates that the impact was from the outside of the
aircraft and not an explosion, which would exhibit metal tearing
from the inside out.
The photographic evidence [not released in MSM] shows some
sizeable pieces of fuselage. One photo shows the impacted area of
the flight deck. Another shows the front right section of the
fuselage, providing a crucial piece of evidence. 9M-MRO, the
registration number of the aircraft which serviced MH370, had a
window plated over, in the vicinity of the front right door. This
was due to a reconfiguration of the cabin. This window was not in
the airframe of 9M-MRD; the aircraft of which allegedly serviced
MH17; yet this window plate is clearly shown in the photographic
crash site evidence.
This then conclusively proves that the airframe as seen in the
MH17 incident was actually that of MH370. In other words,
MH370s aircraft was utilised for the flight of MH17. The illusion
is created that two Malaysian aircraft met their demise, when
there was only ever one aircraft used for both incidents. The
second incident allowed for the disposal of those deceased from
the MH370 flight. This explains why there has been no wreckage
recovered of MH370 [9M-MRO.] My belief is that pieces of this
airframe will eventually be placed in the vicinity of the Southern
Indian Ocean, where authorities claim MH370 vanished. The
photos showing the Ukrainian wreckage show 9M-MRD, however
it is claimed these photos could easily have been photo-shopped
to change the MRO registration to MRD.
Questions need to be asked as to why the scene of MH17 was so
tightly guarded, particularly given that it was a commercial
aircraft and unlikely to be any threat to any nation at war. The
CVR and FDR were removed from the scene and returned at a
later stage by unauthorised persons. Why? The bodies were
removed under close guard and sent to be DNA tested, yet we
have not heard any findings from these forensic evaluations.
A five nation team has been assigned the task of compiling data
and releasing a report on the incident in October. My
investigations have revealed that Malaysia, The Netherlands,
Belgium, Australia and Ukraine are involved in this exercise. It
has been stated that all nations must agree on the findings, as
Page 10 of 18

presented in the report, whether they agree or not with the

content of that report.
Malaysian MH17 was directed over Ukrainian airspace by a Spanish Air
Traffic Controller, at the minimum FL320 permitted by any aircraft
flying over any area of conflict. After the incident, Military Seniors
went to the Controllers and instructed them what they were to say if
they were questioned about the incident. The audio of the two
Commanders discussing MH17 as being a commercial aircraft and not
Military, was time-stamped the day before the Malaysian jet was shot
down. So, how could this have been recorded unless they knew what
was going to occur the next day?
ALL previous ten Malaysian aircraft servicing the route which
MH17 should have taken flew to the south of and not over
Ukraine. There was absolutely no necessity to fly the route that
MH17 flew that day of July 17 2014. My investigation asks the
questions as to WHY this aircraft was intentionally re-routed over
a war zone; one which it had absolutely no reason to take.
My investigations revealed that President Vladimir Putin was enroute to Russia after returning from a BRICS conference in
Argentina. BRICS is the name given to the five nations wishing to
set up a monetary system independent of the Petro-dollar, which
is American based. BRICS nations are Brazil, Russia, India,
China, and South Africa. Malaysian Airlines has white aircraft
with a blue and orange horizontal colour line along the length of
the fuselage. Putins Antonov aircraft is fairly large and is exactly
the same livery as Malaysian colours right down to the tail
insignia. The only difference is that Putins colours and reversed
and tail off at the flight deck area. Further examination of
evidence proves that Putins plane flew the EXACT same
trajectory as the Malaysian B772, only half an hour later. The
flight altitude was also FL320. The heading was identical.
My investigations reveal that the Pro-Russian Separatists did not
have knowledge on the operation of, or have access to, any BUK
missiles. It is my belief that The United States requested the
Ukrainian Military to shoot down MH17 with the intention to
create more tension between Russia and USA, and sending a clear
message to Putin that this is what we can do to you if you dont
conform to our sanctions. The intention was to blame Russia for
the demise of Malaysian MH17.

Page 11 of 18

FOOTNOTE The Boeing 777 series has been in service for app
19 years and is deemed to one of the safest aircraft flying
today. There is app only four events recorded involving the
Boeing 777. The likelihood of a major incident involving total
loss and non-recovery of one of these aircraft is extremely
minimal. The fact that TWO B772 aircraft were involved in
catastrophic events, less than five months apart of each other,
is no mere coincidence. Even more ridiculous is that both these
aircraft are from the same airline; in this case Malaysian.
Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. These two
incidents fully prove this statement does in fact apply to these
aircraft events.
---- ENDS ----

Page 12 of 18

SUMMARY OF GERMAN WINGS 4U-9525 ~

Downing of Aircraft Facts & Investigation Notes ~
Date of Preparation ~ July 27 2015
This incident should flag serious concern to the world. It involves
the hacking into AUAP systems aboard Airbus in order to
commandeer a flight and use it for whatever nefarious purposes
the perpetrators desired.
This flight had its controls hacked into and over-ridden with the
blame being pinned onto the 27 yr old Co-Pilot, Andreas Lubitz.
Lubitz was an innocent pawn in this deadly game of International
Chess. He was NOT suicidal and this was not a suicide/homicidal
activity. GermanWings is a subsidiary of Lufthansa, much like
Jetstar is to Qantas. They are able to monitor all aircraft which
are in-flight from their command centres and should be able to
intercept flight deck operations and take manual control of the
aircraft in the event of an emergency/terrorist attempt. However,
in the case of GW 4U-9525 they were effectively locked out of
all controls; likewise were the flight crew.
My investigations have revealed that the wreckage scene is not
consistent with the debris field which would result in an aircraft
impacting a mountainside. In this type of impact we should be
witnessing a debris field similar to the Air New Zealand flight
TE901, which slammed into Mt Erebus on November 28 1979,
killing all aboard. The debris field hits in a V type of
configuration atypical with impact on a slope. The tail section
should be intact, as is usually the case with most accidents. This
is why the CVR & FDR are housed in this section.
The debris field of GermanWings shows small pieces of
indistinguishable wreckage over a 1 mile circular radius. The
nature of this debris field is consistent with a mid-air explosion.
It is therefore my conclusion that the Airbus 320 was
compromised whilst still airborne. Further investigations uncover
some disturbing facts which prove the truth is being covered up
by more than one nation. Investigators I have spoken with within
the Aviation Industry have concurred with these findings. In fact,
there are very few pilots [if any] who believe this crash was a
suicide or in any way associated with the claimed rogue actions
of the Co-Pilot.
Search & Rescue teams were on the scene in remarkably quick
time indicating that maybe they were in place ready and waiting
for this event to unfold, and to ensure the scene was secured. The
Page 13 of 18

terrain was especially challenging with restricted access. My

sources claim that The German Chancellor, French President, and
Italian President were all together at the scene, and that this has
never happened in any previous incidents.
With the wreckage field being substantially widespread,
comprised of small pieces, and in an inhospitable area, it flags
suspicion as follows
o The CVR & FDR were retrieved within a couple of
days. It seems quite likely they knew where to look.
o The voice and data recordings were retrieved as were
the casings. The information appeared to be
salvageable. Really? Take a look at the crash scene
again. A CLOSE look - on non-MSM. Doesnt look like
a scene where anything much would have survived.
Andreas Lubitz A reasonably new Airbus FAA Accredited flight
crew member. Six months earlier or for a period of six months,
Lubitz was sent to FAA training in the USA. This is the equivalent of
receiving advanced training not dissimilar to receiving accreditation
as having attained a higher level of experience with A320 systems.
This Co-Pilot had 630hrs rated flying time in an A320. My
investigations led me to make contact with a now retired ex-military
Fighter Pilot who served 22 years service in the USA before flying
A320s for an American Commercial Carrier over many years. He
also spent time in another country for 18 months flying A320s and
accrued 23,000hrs of incident free flying. This Pilot stated that the
actions Lubitz is alleged to have carried out would not and could not
have been performed by a Pilot with Lubitzs level of experience. He
went on to state that even he himself, having flown Fighter Jets,
would not be able to configure the aircraft to manually execute what
Lubitz has been alleged to have done. This Pilot has presented his
observations to various organisations in Europe, UK, America, and
South America; amongst others.
Reports to mainstream media [MSM] claim that Lubitz was suicidal.
This is not true. Lubitz had been to see various doctors as he was
having visual issues and was anxious that his flying career could be
terminated as a result and was attempting to hide this from his
employer. He was naturally concerned and had a slightly deflated
demeanour but was not suicidal. The doctors note which was
located torn up in Lubitzs flat has not been produced to the MSM
for scrutiny, nor its contents fully revealed. I question whether this
doctors note ever existed or whether it was planted to place the
blame on Andreas Lubitz.
Page 14 of 18

Claims have been made that the CVR had recorded Lubitz breathing
normally through an oxygen mask. There are several anomalies with
this. In the lead-up to an event such as Lubitz is alleged to have
undertaken, it is unlikely for any breathing to be normal.
Breathing would have been intensified along with heart rate in
correlation with the inbuilt human fight or flight programming.
Investigations reveal that the oxygen masks have a hot or cold
status. Hot meaning that the microphones are active for
communication between the flight crew. They are left in a cold
[i.e. microphone off setting] when not communicating, so that the
crew are not subjected to hearing their own breathing. The on-board
voice recorders are not able to detect anything when the
microphone is in this off status. For these reasons, it is highly
improbable for the events claimed by those authorities
investigating this incident to have occurred as they have
portrayed them. The door control access to the flight deck could be
accessed and locked via externally hacking into the flight controls.
And YES, it can and has been done.
[Reference: recent hacking into Jeep Cherokee computer controlled
SUV systems and taking over control of the vehicle. Reference: a
Pax aboard a United Airlines flight who claims he was able to hack
into the computer systems of the flight he was undertaking at the
time. Reference: recently the grounding of all United Airlines flights
as their ground computer systems had been hacked into and
compromised.]
It is an International requirement under Aviation Flight Rules that
when one member of the flight crew vacates the flight deck leaving
only one member remaining, that an oxygen mask is mandatory to
be worn at altitudes in excess of FL250. This explains why Lubitz
would have been wearing the mask.
Two other aspects dont make any sense. If a member of the flight
crew was going to commit an act of suicide it is unlikely he or she
would be affixing an oxygen mask prior to taking this action. Also,
the plane took many minutes to descend to point of impact with the
Mountain Range. If Lubitz was suicidal, surely he would have aimed
the aircraft into a vertical dive. This did not occur. The rate of
descent increased per the laws of gravity etc, hence why the speed
at impact was exceedingly high. There was no absolute guarantee
that hitting the mountain would prove fatal and impact the integrity
of the airframe as was experienced with this crash. Remember that
the American Military Fighter Jet Pilot said even HE wouldnt be
able to manually fly the manual configuration for the aircraft to
behave as it did and impact the mountain let alone a rookie CoPage 15 of 18

Pilot, with only 630hrs rated flying time on an Airbus A320 to his
name!
My investigations with international sources have revealed the
series of events which played out, based on data obtained, but not
currently presented to MSM for the general public. ~
Captain says to Lubitz, as per standard protocol, you have
control, prior to vacating the flight deck. Lubitz replies
with I hope so. Not an unreasonable or surprising
response from a newbie crew member with only 630hrs
rating under his belt. Its a huge responsibility.
Information obtained by international investigators within
the aviation industry have produced evidence showing that
prior to the GermanWings 4U-9525 event, fighter jets were
present and in the immediate airspace. An Italian jet was in
the vicinity monitoring events and made a transmission
whilst on scene. Likewise, an American Fighter was also
present and only observing. Three French fighter jets were
shadowing the aircraft one on each side, and one behind.
According to my source, one French fighter would have
flown parallel to the flight deck on the left side and
signalled for the pilot to follow him. He would then turn
away and circle around to see if the pilot was responding to
his wishes. These jets had intercepted the A320 shortly
after deviating from its intended standard flight path. The
crew were locked out of the Airbus controls, likewise
communications, including any control from the Lufthansa
control centre.
Upon receiving no response from the Airbus crew, the
fighter jet would have gone around alongside the pilots
window even closer than the first fly-by. He would have
noticed that the pilot was not on the flight deck and that
the co-pilot was wearing an oxygen mask. This would be an
expected and acceptable situation if the GermanWings flight
had not been hacked into and hadnt deviated from its
original scheduled flight plan. It would have been standard
protocol for a normal flight. The exception to this incident
was the deviation of the lodged flight plan and the
subsequent inability of Lufthansa to make contact with the
Airbus crew or indeed, to override the systems and take
over control of the aircraft. A fighter jet pilot, probably in
his 20s and with limited time would have had to make the
on-the-spot decision as to whether to go hostile with the
Airbus and take it out then and there. His choice would
Page 16 of 18

only be whether to terminate GermanWings 4U-9525 inflight and take the lives of 150 pax and crew or allow the
aircraft to continue on its trajectory, thereby taking the
lives of potentially thousands.
My aviation source advises that the Airbus A320 flight
systems had been externally hacked into for the purposes of
re-routing the aircraft over the mountains towards a dam
servicing 16 Hydro-dams. Breaching this dam would have
resulted in the loss of power [and water supplies] for people
living in towns below this area, which would have been
wiped out by the water flow.
All fighter jets dispersed upon termination of the
GermanWings flight. To my knowledge this information has
not been publicly released.
FOOTNOTE It is very convenient to blame an incident
such as the destruction of this Airbus A320 on the Co-Pilot,
who is not alive to defend himself and present what really
happened that day.
There has been no known evidence supporting these
claims, and the general consensus amongst the Aviation
Industry is that this was a pre-planned event with the CoPilot stitched up for the responsibility of causing it. The
true perpetrators of this heinous crime are found within
the Governments of the Countries who were playing out
their issues with each other, and using this event to push
a point home and as a bully tactic to show they mean
business. [Play by our rules.... or this is what we can do.]
That this incident was not given the space to be conducted
as planned gives us good reason to thank the French
fighter pilot who had to make a crucial and split-second
decision whether 9525 was in fact rogue and whether to
terminate 150 lives in an effort to spare thousands more.
Not a decision to be taken lightly or to be envied.
The afore-mentioned findings and data are as accurate as possible based on the indisputable evidence,
which has been cross-referenced and substantiated through various media and other sources.
However some content is the opinion of the Author of this document, based upon evidence uncovered
during investigations.
No responsibility will be assumed for any action any person takes in response to their interpretation of any
portion of this report. There is no copyright assigned and you are free to distribute it or forward it on to
any individual or organisation, whether or not same are able to forward the contents to those enabled to
legally act upon progressing these cases, with the intention of the truth being exposed.
Page 17 of 18

GLOSSARY ~
ACARS : Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System
APP : Approximately
ATC : Air Traffic Control
VATC : Vietnam Air Traffic Control
AUAP : Airbus Un-Interruptable Auto Pilot
B772 : Boeing 777-200ER
B763 : Boeing 767-300
BUAP : Boeing Un-Interruptable Auto Pilot
CIA : Central Intelligence Agency, USA
Comms : Communications
CVR : Cockpit Voice Recorder [Records on-board flight deck audio]
DG : Diego Garcia Military Atoll
FAA : Federal Aviation Administration
FBI : Federal Bureau of Investigation, USA
FDR : Flight Data Recorder [Records pertinent parameters & technical
information of the flight]
FL : Flight Level [Followed by numbers] FL350 = 35,000ft
MSM : Mainstream Media
NSA : National Security Agency, USA
9M-MRO : The registration number allocated to the B772 which
serviced MH370
9M-MRD : The registration number allegedly allocated to the B772
which is claimed to have serviced MH17

Page 18 of 18