Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
OF EDDIE T. BAGSIK
FORMAL OFFER: This Judicial Affidavit will affirm to the truth of the
foregoing statements and to support the petition filed by EDILBERTO
BRAVO for an action of damages against JOSE DAMOLMOG under
Article 19 and 20 of the New Civil Code in Relation to Section 177 and 216
(b) (e) of Republic Act No. 8293.
I, EDDIE T. BAGSIK, of legal age, Filipino and with address at 123
Tulak St., Poblacion, Sibulan, Negros Oriental, after having been duly
sworn, hereby state and depose that:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The person examining me is Atty. Rowtir John L. Banquerigo with
office address at Lukban St., Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental. The
examination is being held at the same aforementioned address. I am
answering his questions fully conscious that I do so under oath and may face
criminal liability for false testimony and/or perjury.
Q1:
A1:
Yes sir.
Q2:
Q2:
Q3:
A3:
Yes sir.
Q4:
A4:
Q5:
A5:
Q6:
A6:
In one of our class, his lecture was substantially the same with that of
the lecture of Atty. Bravo where he delivered sometime on March 3,
2015 at the Silliman University College of Law Moot Court.
Q7:
How did you know that Damolmogs lecture was the same as that
which was delivered by Atty. Bravo?
A7:
I took notes on the lecture of Atty. Bravo and compared it to the class
lecture of Mr. Damolmog and also the lectures were entitled the same.
Q8:
Which part of Atty. Bravos lecture was the same with that of Mr.
Damolmogs, if any?
A9:
Both of their lectures discussed about the Legal Education being the
best medium to understand the discipline and complexity of
developing a legal mind. That the biggest contribution of the legal
profession is that it helps us to think critically and helps us solve
problems. They also discussed that the best way to teach law is
through a grand and majestic manner and that you must so much
respect in the legal profession to fully understand it.
Q10: They also discussed the relationship of the discipline of law compared
to the discipline in business. That both discipline required the same
skills.
Q11: Was there a difference between the lecture of Atty. Bravo and that of
Mr. Damolmogs, if any?
Q11:
None exactly sir. The lecture of Mr. Damolmog was verbatim of one
delivered by Atty. Bravo.
EDDIE T. BAGSIK
Affiant