Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
31
Case 2:07-cv-00354 Document 31 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 4
ERIK C. CURRAN
AMAZON.COM, INC., et al
1. July 9, 2007
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), a meeting was held on _____________________. Those
participating were:
Charles M. Love, IV
________________________________ for plaintiff(s)
David Barnette
________________________________ Amazon.Com, & St. Martin's Press
for defendant(s) ________________________________
Andrew cooke
________________________________ Getty Images, Inc.
for defendant(s) ________________________________
Page 1 of 4
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-00354 Document 31 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 2 of 4
4. Discovery Plan. The parties jointly propose to the court the following discovery plan:
[Use separate paragraphs or subparagraphs as necessary if parties disagree.]
The parties have agreed to an order regarding claims of privilege or of protection as trial-
preparation material asserted after production, as follows:
The parties defer protective order issues until discovery requests are exchanged.
No agreement at this time.
This action is not suitable for designation as a complex case requiring special case
management procedures and additional pretrial conferences. If the parties and attorneys believe that
the case is complex, the basis for that belief is:
February 1, 2008
The last date to serve discovery requests is ____________________. The last date on which
to take a discovery deposition is 45 days after the last date to serve discovery requests. The last date
on which to take a discovery deposition is known as the “discovery completion date.” [Discovery
liability and damages
on ____________________to March 17, 2008
be completed by ____________________.]
The parties do adopt the discovery limits set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. If the parties and attorneys believe that more discovery is needed, the basis for that
belief is:
Page 2 of 4
Case 2:07-cv-00354 Document 31 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 3 of 4
December 1, 2007
By the party with the burden of proof on an issue: ____________________;
January 15, 2008
By the party not bearing the burden of proof on an issue: ____________________; and
Expert witness disclosures intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same issue
February 15, 2008
identified by another party: ____________________.
5. Magistrate judges will resolve discovery disputes. The parties do not consent to have a
United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including
trial, and order the entry of a final judgment.
9. Where applicable, proposed jury instruction shall be exchanged and transmitted to chamber s
N/A
of the presiding judicial officer in WordPerfect format on or before ____________________.
10. Where applicable, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be exchanged and
transmitted to chambers of the presiding judicial officer in WordPerfect format on
N/A
or before ____________________.
Page 3 of 4
Case 2:07-cv-00354 Document 31 Filed 07/16/2007 Page 4 of 4
The parties Select: a conference with the court before entry of the scheduling order.
s/Charles M. Love, IV
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
Charles M. Love, IV
West Virginia State Bar No. 7477
The Masters Law Firm lc
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
181 Summers Street
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
(304) 342-3106
(304) 342-3189
cml@themasterslawfirm.com
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
Page 4 of 4