Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Labrouste's
design highlights how the peculiar
proper ties of the new structural
material aesthetica lly transformed
the shapes of traditional masonry
arch itecture. But it is also clear how
reluctant some 19th-century architects were to su rrender traditional
forms, even when fully aware of
new possibilities for design and
22-46A ROEBLING, Brooklyn Bridge,
construction. Architects scoffed at
!867-1883.
"engineers' architecture" fo r ma ny
years and continued to clothe their steel-and-concrete st ructures
in the Romantic "drapery" of a historical style. For exa mple, the
designer of the Brooklyn Bridge (FIG. 22-46A), JOHN AUGUSTUS
RoEBLING (1806-1869}, combined the latest steel technology with
motifs from Gothic and Egyptian architecture.
CRYSTAL PALACE Completely "u ndraped" construction
first became popular in the conservatories (greenhouses) of English country estates. JosE PH PAXTON (1801-1865} built several of
these structures for his patron, the duke of Devonshire. In the largest-300 feet long-he used an experimental system of glass-andmetal roof construction. Encouraged by the success of this system,
Paxton submitted a w innin g glass-a nd-i ron building design in the
competition for the hall to house the Great Exhibition of 185 1 in
London, organ ized to present "works of industry of a ll natio ns."
Paxton constructed the ex hibition building, the Crysta l Pa lace
(FIG. 22-47), with prefabricated parts. This enabled workers to build
the vast structure in the then-unheard-of time of six months and to
dismantle it quickly at t he exhibition's closing to avoid permanent
obstruction of the park. The plan bo rrowed much from Roman a nd
Christian basilicas, with a central flat-roofed "nave" and a barrelvaulted crossing "tran sept." The design provided ample interior
space to conta in displays of huge machines as well as to accommodate decorative touches in the form of la rge working fountains
and giant trees. The public admired the Crystal Palace so much that
the workers who dismantled it put up an enlarged version of the
glass-and-steel ex hibition hall at a new location on the outskirts of
London at Syden ham, where it remained until fire destroyed it in
1936. Fortunately, a few old black-and-white pho tographs and several color lithographs (FIG. 22-4 7) preserve a record of the Crystal
Palace's appeara nce.
PHOTOGRAPHY
A technological device of immense consequence for the modern
experience was invented shortly before the mid-19th centu ry:
the camera, with its attendant art of photograph y. From th e time
Frenchman LoUis-JACQUES-MANDE DAGUERRE (1789-1851) and
Briton Wi lliam Henry Fox Talbot (1800-1877} anno unced the
first practical photographic processes in 1839, people have celebrated photography's ability to make convi ncing pictures of
people, places, and things. The relative ease of th e process, even
in its earl iest and most pr imitive form, seemed a dream come true
for scientists and artists, who for centuries had g rappled with less
satisfying methods of capturing acc urate images of their subjects.
Photography also perfectly suited a n age that saw the emergence
of Realism as an a rt movement and a pro nounced shift of artistic patronage away from the elite few toward a broader base of
support. The grow ing and increasingly powerful middle class
embraced bo th the com prehensible images of the new art istic medium and their lower cost.
For the traditional artist, photography suggested new answers
to the great debate about what is real and how to represent the real
in art. Because photography easily and accurately enabled the reproduction of three-dimensional objects on a two-dimensional
surface, the new medium also challenged the place of traditional
modes of pictorial representation o riginating in the Renaissance.
Artists as diverse as Delacroix, Ingres, Courbet, and the Impressionist Edgar Degas (see Chapter 23} welcomed photography as
a helpful auxiliary to painting. O ther artists, however, feared the
camera was a mechanism that would displace the painstaking work
of skilled painters. From the moment of its invent ion, photography t hreatened to expropriate the realistic image, until then the
exclusive property of pai nting. But just as some painters looked to
the new medium of photography for answers on how best to render an image in paint, so some photographers looked to painting
for suggestio ns about ways to imbue the photographic image with
qualities beyond simple reproduction. Indeed, the first subjects
photographers chose to record were traditional painting themes,
for example, still lifes a nd port raits-in part to establish photography as a legitimate artistic medium o n a par with painting. A debate immediately began over whether the photograph was an art
form or if the camera was merely a scientific instrument. An 1862
court case provided the answer: Photography was an art, and photographs were entitled to copyright pro tect ion.
Art ists themselves were instrumental in the development of
the new photographic technology. The camera obscura was famil iar to 18th-century art ists. In 1807, the invention of the camera
Lucida (lighted room) replaced the enclosed chamber of the camera obscu ra. Now the photographer aimed a sma ll prism lens,
hun g on a stand , dow nward at an object. The lens projected the
image of t he o bject onto a sheet of paper. Artists using either of
these dev ices found th e process long and arduous, no matter how
accurate the result ing work. All yea rned for a more direct way
to capture a subject's image. Two very different scientific inventions that accomplished this-the daguerreotype and the calotype
(see "Daguerreotypes, Calotypes, and Wet-Plate Photography,"
page 680)-appeared almost simultaneously in France and Engla nd in 1839.
DAGUERREOTYPES The French government presented the
new daguerreotype process at the Academy of Science in Paris on
January 7, 1839, with the understanding that its details would be
made available to all interested parties w ithout charge (alt hough
the inventor received a la rge annu ity in appreciation). Soon, people
worldwide bega n making pictures with the daguerreotype "camera" (a name shortened from camera obscura} in a process almost
immediately ch ristened "photography," from t he Greek photos
(light) and graphos (writ ing). From the start, the possibilities of
the process as a new art medium intrigued painters. Paul Delaroch e (1797- 1856}, a leading academic pai nter of the day, wrote in
a n official report to the French government that anticipated the
1862 legal ruling:
Daguerre's process completely satisfies all the demands of art,
carrying certain essential pri nciples of art to such perfection that
it must become a subject of observation and study even to the most
accomplished painters. The pictures obtai ned by th is method are
as remarkable for the perfection of the details as for the richness
and harmony of the general effect. Nature is reproduced in them
not only with truth, but also with art. 14
Photography
679
'
sensitized paper and exposing the arrangement to light. This created a design oflight-colored silhouettes recording the places where
opaque or translucent objects had blocked light from darkening
the paper's emulsion. In his experiments, Talbot next exposed
sensiti zed papers inside simple cameras and, with a second sheet,
created "positive" images. He further improved the process with
more light-sensitive chemicals and a chemical development of the
negative image. This technique enabled multiple prints. However,
in Talbot's process, which he named the calotype (from the Greek
word kalos, "beautiful"), the photographic images incorporated the
texture of the paper. This produced a slightly blurred, grainy effect
very different from the crisp detail and wide tonal range available
with the daguerreotype. Also discouraging widespread adoption of
the calotype were the stiff licensing and equipment fees charged for
many years after Talbot patented his new process in 1841.
One of the earliest masters of an improved kind of calotype
photography was the multitalented Frenchman known as Nadar
(FIGS. 22-50 and 22-51). He used glass negatives and albumen (prepared with egg white) printing paper (FIGS. 22-52 and 22-53), which
could record finer detail and a wider range of light and shadow than
Talbot's calotype process. The new wet-plate technology (so named
because the photographic plate was exposed, developed, and fixed
while wet) almost at once became the universal way of making negatives until 1880. However, wet-plate photography had drawbacks.
The plates had to be prepared and processed on the spot. Working
outdoors meant taking along a portable darkroom-a wagon, tent, or
box with light-tight sleeves for the photographer's arms.
Refinements of these early processes served photographers
well for a century and a half but have been largely supplanted today
by digital photography (see Chapter 26).
680
C h apter 22
The partners also took their equipment outside the studio torecord places and events of particular interest to them. One resultant
image is Early Operation under Ether, Massachusetts General Hospital (FIG. 22-49). This daguerreotype, taken from the vantage point of
the gallery of a hospital operating room, put the viewer in the position of medical students looking down on a lecture-demonstration
typical throughout the 19th century. An image of historical record,
this early daguerreotype predates Eakins's Gross Clinic (FIG. 22-36)
by almost three decades. The focus of attention in Early Operation
is the white-draped patient su rrounded by a circle of darkly clad
doctors. The details of the figures and the room's furnishings are in
sharp focus, but the slight blurring of several of the figures betrays
motion du ring the exposure. The elevated viewpoint flattens the
spatial perspective and emphasizes the relationships of the figures in
ways the Impressionists, especially Degas, found intriguing.
Photog raphy
681
22-50 NADAR, Eugene Delacroix, ca. 1855. Modern print, 8t" X 6j",
from the origi nal negative. Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris.
Nadar was one of the earliest portrait photographers. H1s pnnts of the
leading artists of the day, such as t his one of Delacroix, reveal the sitters'
personal ities as well as record their features.
g uides you to his habits, his ideas, and charac ter and enables you
to produce . .. a really convincing a nd sympathetic likeness, an
int imate portra it." 15
Nadar's Eugene Delacroix (FIG. 22-50) shows the painter at
the height of his career. In this photograph, the a r tist appears w ith
remarkable presence. Even in half- length, his gesture and expression create a mood that seems to revea l much about him. Perhaps
Delacroix responded to Nadar's famous gift for putting his clients
at ease by assuming the pose that best ex pressed his personality.
The new photographic materials made possible the rich range of
tones in Nadar's images.
Nadar achieved so much fame for his wet-plate photographic
portraits (see "Daguerreotypes, Calotypes, and Wet-Plate Photography," page 680) that he became the subject of a Daumier lithograph (FIG. 22-51) that provides incisive a nd amusing commentary
about the struggle of photography to be recognized as a fine art.
Daumier made his print in response to the 1862 court decision acknowledging photographs were indeed artworks. In the lithograph,
Nadar energetically takes pictures with his camera as his balloon
rises over Parisian rooftops- Daumier's literal representation of the
elevation of photography's status the French judge rea ffirmed . The
image a lso refers to the fact that Nadar was a staunch advocate of
balloon transportation and aerial reconnaissa nce. He produced the
first aeria l photographs of Paris in 1858 from his balloon Le Geant
(The Giant).
682
Chapter 22
JULIA MARGARET CAMERON Among the most famous portrait photographers in 19th-century England was JULIA
MARGARET CAMERON (1815-1879), who did not take up photography seriously until the age of 48. Although she produced images of
many well-known men of the period, including Charles Darwin,
Alfred Tennyson, and Thomas Carlyle, she photographed more
women than men, as was true of many women photographers.
Ophelia, Study No. 2 (FIG. 22-52) typifies her portrait style. Cameron often depicted her female subjects as characters in literary or
biblical narratives. The slightly blurred focus also became a distinctive feature of her work-the byproduct of photographing with a
lens with a short foca l length, wh ich a llowed only a small area of
sharp foc us. The blurriness adds an ethereal, dreamlike tone to the
photographs, appropriate for Cameron's fictional "characters." Her
photograph of Ophelia has a mysterious, fragile quality reminiscent ofPre-Raphaelite paintings (FIG. 22-41) of literary heroines.
TIMOTHY 0 'SULLIVAN Photographers were quick to realize the documentary power of their new medium. Thus began the
story of photography's influence on modern life and of the immense
changes it brought to communication and information management.
Historical events could be reco rded in permanent form on the spot
for the first time. The photographs taken of the Crimean War (18 56)
by Roger Fenton (1819-1869) and of the America n Civil War
Mathew B. Brady (1823-1896), ALEXANDER GARDNER (1821-1882 '
b[
and TIMOTHY O'SuLLIVAN (1840-1882) remain un surpassed as incisive accounts of military life, unsparing in their truth to detail and
poignant as expressions of human experience.
Of the Civil War photographs, the most moving are the inhumanly objective records of combat deaths. Perhaps the most reproduced of these Civil War photographs is Gardner's print ofO'Sull ivan's
A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (FIG. 22-53). Although
viewers could regard this image as simple reportage, it also functions
to impress on people the high price of war. Corpses litter the battlefield as far as the eye can see. O'Sullivan presented a scene stretching far to the horizon. As the photograph modulates from the precise
clarity of the bodies of Union soldiers in the foreground, boots stolen
and pockets picked, to the indistinct corpses in the distance, the suggestion of innumerable other dead soldiers is unavoidable. This "harvest" is far more sobering and depressing tha n that in Winslow Homer's Civil War painting, Veteran in a New Field (FIG. 22-35). Though it
was years before photolithography could reproduce photographs such
as this in newspapers, photographers exhibited them publicly. They
made an impression newsprint engravings never could.
22-53
TIMOTHY
O'SULLIVAN, A Harvest
of Death, Gettysburg,
Pennsylvania, 1863.
Negative by Timothy
O'Sullivan. Albumen
print by ALEXANDER
GARDNER, 6;}" X Sf''.
New York Public
Library (Astor,
Lenox and Tilden
Foundations, Rare
Books and Manuscript
Division), New York.
Wet-plate technology
enabled photographers
to record historical
events on the spotand to comment on the
high pnce of war, as
in th 1s photograph of
dead Union soldiers at
Gettysburg in 1863 .
Photog ra phy
683
American art. Thus, 291, like the Armory Show, played an important role in the history of ea rly-20th-century art in America. Stieglitz had seen and exhibited some of O'Keeffe's earlier work, and he
drew her into his avant-ga rde circle of painters and photographers.
He became one of O'Keeffe's staunchest supporters and, eventually,
her husband. The interest of Stieglitz and his circle in capturing the
sensibility of the machine age intersected with O' Keeffe's fascination with the fast pace of city life, and she produced paintings during this period, such as New York, Night (FIG. 24-42), featuring the
soaring skyscrapers dominating the city. As did other Precisionists,
O'Keeffe reduced her images to simple pla nes, here punctuated by
small rectangular windows that add rhythm and energy to the image, countering the monolithic darkness of the looming buildings.
Despite O'Keetfe's affiliation with the Precisionist movement
and New York, she is best known for her paintings of cow skulls
and of flowers. For example, in Jack in the Pulpit No.4 (FIG. 1-5), she
reveals her interest in stripping subjects to their purest forms and
colors to heighten their expressive power. In this work, O'Keeffe
reduced the incredible details of a flower to a symphony of basic
colors, shapes, textures, a nd vital rhythms. Exh ibiting the natural
flow of curved planes and contour, O'Keetfe simplified the formalmost to the point of complete abstraction. The fluid planes unfold
like undulant petals from a subtly placed axis-the white jetlike
streak- in a vision of the slow, controlled motion of growing life.
O'Keetfe's painting, in its graceful, quiet poetry, reveals the organic
reality of the object by strengthening its characteristic features.
Photography
Among the most significant artistic developments during the decades between the two world wars was the emergence of photography as a respected branch of the fine arts. The person most responsible for elevating the stature of photography was Alfred Stieglitz.
The scene fascinated me: A round hat; the funnel lea ning left, the
sta irway leaning right; the white drawbridge, its railing made of
chain; white suspenders crossed on the back of a ma n below; circular iron machinery; a mast that cut into the sky, completing a
triangle. I stood spellbound. I saw shapes related to one anothera picture of shapes, a nd underlying it, a new vision that held me:
simple people; the feeling of ship, ocean, sky; a sense of release that
I was away from the mob called rich. Rembrandt came into my
mind and I wondered would he have felt as I did .... I had only one
plate holder with one unexposed plate. Could I catch what I saw
a nd felt? I released the shutter. If I had captured what I wanted,
the photograph would go far beyond any of my previous prints.
It would be a picture based on related shapes and deepest human
feeling-a step in my own evolution, a spontaneous discoveryY
2443A
STIEGLITZ,
Equivalent,
1923. ~
757
chose peppers whose shapes reminded h im of human bodies. Pepper No. 30 looks like a seated nude figure seen from behind with
raised arms emerging from broad shoulders. Viewers can read the
vertica l crease down the center of the vegetable as the spinal column leading to the buttocks. Although highly successful as a purely
abstract composition of shapes and of light and dark, Weston's still
life also conveys m ystery a nd sensuality th rough its dramatic lighting and rich texture.
Architecture
As did other a rt ists, many early-20th-century architects in the
United States looked to Europe fo r inspiration, but distinctive
America n styles a lso emerged that in turn had a major influence on
architectu ra l design worldwide.
FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT O ne of the most st riking persona lities in the development of modern architecture on either
side of the Atlantic was FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT (1867-1959). Born
in Wisconsin, W right moved to C hicago, where he eventually
joined the firm headed by Louis Sulliva n (FIGS . 23-40, 23-40A, and
23-41). Wright set out to create an American "arch itecture of democracy."28 Always a believer in "natural" and "organ ic" buildings,
Wright saw architecture as serving free indiv idua ls who have the
rig h t to move within a "free" space, envisioned as a nonsymmetrical design interacting spatially with its natural surroundings. He
sought to develop an organ ic unity of plan ning, structure, materials, and site. Wright identified the pri nciple of continuity as fundam enta l to understanding his view of organ ic unity:
24-44 EDWARD WESTON, Pepper No. 30, 1930. Gelatin silver pri nt,
9!" X 7f". Center for Creative Photography, University of Arizona,
Tucson.
Weston "previsualized" his still lites, choosing the exact angle, l1ght1ng,
and framing he des1red. His vegetables often resemble human bodies,
in this case a seated nude seen from behind.
EDWARD WEST O N Like Alfred Stieglitz, in whose 291 Gallery he exhibi ted his work, EDWARD WESTON (1886- 1958) played
a major role in es tablishing pho tography as an impor ta nt art istic
m ed ium. But unlike Stieglitz, who worked outdoors and sought to
capture transito r y moments in his p hotographs, Weston meticulous ly composed and carefu lly lit his subjects in a controlled stu d io setting, whether he was doi ng stilllifes of peppers, shells, a nd
other natura l forms of irregular shape, or figure studies. The 1930
photograph of a pepper illustrated
here (FIG. 24-44) is the 30th in a large
series a nd an outstanding example
of t his genre. ln cont rast to Weston's
photog raphs of sec tions of nude hu man bod ies (FIG. 24-44A), hi s s till-life
photographs show the entire object,
albeit tightly framed. (Compare Geor2444A WESTON, Nude, 1925.
gia O' Keeffe's Jack-in-the-Pulpit No. 4
[FIG . 1-5] pa inted the same year.) The artific ia l lighting accentuates t he undulating s urfaces and c revices of the vegetable. Weston
left nothing to chance, choosing the exact angle a nd play of light
over the object, "previs ua li zing" the fina l photographic print before snapping the cam era's shutter.
In a kind of reversa l of his approach to photographing nudes,
which he often transformed into landscapes, Weston frequently
758
Chapter 24
Classic architectu re was all fixation .. . . Now why not let walls,
ceilings, floors become seen as component parts of each other? ...
You may see the appearance in the surface of your hand contrasted
with the articulation of the bony structure itself. This ideal, profo und in its architectura l implications ... I called . .. continuity. 29
W rig ht man ifested his v igorous originality early, and by 1900
he had arrived at a style entirely h is own. In his work during the
first decade of the 20th century, his cross-axial plan and his fabric
of continuous roof planes and screens defined a new American dom est ic architecture.
Photography
Frida Kahlo is the most famous female artist of her generation, but
other women achieved prominence in the arts, especially the photographers Dorothea Lange and Margaret Bourke-White.
782
Chapter 24