Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Q1
(a) Equipotential = line of constant total head
q
this leads to two important consequences:
1) potential drop h is the same along any flow
channel
Define:
Nd= Number of potential drops
H = overall difference in total head
F= 132.5*3+72.5*6.5+65*7.5+55*3=1521 kN
F=1521 kN/m
Q2
(a)
Soil properties: c, f, g
l
b
b = l cosb
PR
W = g z b = g z l cosb
hw
PL
Sm
Slip
surface
N (= N + U)
Since the slope is infinite: PL = PR
to slope: N = W cosb
s = g z cos2b
tm = g z sinb cosb
to slope: Sm = W sinb
Stresses:
s = N/l
tm = Sm/l
tf = c + (s-u)
tf
tm =
F=
zsincos
1
F
(c + (gzcos2b-u) tanf)
(F = factor of safety)
c+(-u)tan
tanf
g z sinb cosb =
F=
c/ z+(cos2 -ru)tan
sincos
thus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(b) (i)
Water table
(top flow line)
hw dw = height of WT above
slip surface
z=4m
b
Slip
surface
dw=4-1.2=2.8m
hw=dw*cos2=2.8*cos2 10=2.72 m
ru=w*hw/(z)=10*2.72/20/4=0.34
Take c=0 ( as peak strengths are not appropriate for landslides)
F=
(cos2 10 -0.34)tan
sin 10 cos 10
= 0.172
tan15
Q3
100
280
80
160
3
u
'1
100
0
100
100
0
280
80
0
80
80
85
75
'3
100
t
0
s
100
s'
100
*all quantities in kPa
100
90
190
190
80
0
80
80
-5
40
120
35
t (kPa)
a) A stress path is a graph used to plot successive states of stress for a soil element. Examples of
such plots include s1 vs s3 t = (s1-s3)/2 vs s = (s1+s3)/2 and q = s1-s3 vs p = (s1+s2+s3)/3. A failure
envelope is a line on a Mohr diagram or a stress path plot used to separate admissible from
inadmissible states of stress
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------b)
Sample
1
2
100
Sample 1 Total and effective
90
start
end
start
end
i)
Sample 2 effective
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Sample 2 total
Kf line
50
100
150
200
s, s' (kPa)
=18.8
consolidation
shearing
100
100 +x
s=0
100 -x
100
t=x
total stress path is vertical
Arbitrarily assume a value for x at failure , for example x=50 kPa, thus t=50 kPa.
Using pore pressure equation, u=B(3+A(1- 3))=1(-t+A(2*t))=-50+1.06*100=56 kPa to
which correspond s=s-u=100-56 =44 kPa. Draw effective stress path in t-s plot and determine
intercept with the Kf line. This will give a value of t=45 kPa and a principal stress difference of 90 kPa.
t (kPa)
100
90
Sample 2 effective
80
Sample 2 total
70
Kf line
60
Sample 3 effective
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
s, s' (kPa)
200
Q4
(a)
2.2
Void ratio
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
1
78 100
10
1000
Q5. (a)
Dense granular soils dilate when sheared, with the shear stress reaching a peak as the soil dilates,
before dropping to a constant value at larger strains, when the soil is shearing at constant volume.
This large strain strength is termed the critical state.
Loose granular soils may compact slightly when sheared, but probably do not exhibit any peak
strength before reaching the critical state.
The peak and critical state strength increases with the confining stress level. Dilation decreases with
an increase of the confining stress.
Increase in relative density would cause an increase in a peak strength increase and dilation of the
sample. The critical state strength is not influenced by the relative density of the sample.
Shear stress
Peak
Dense
Critical state
Loose
Specimen
thickness
Dense
Displacement
Loose
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(b)
circle
Pole
Centre
Radius
'p
p
112.5 kPa
37.6 kPa
80
80.0 kPa
60
19.0 kPa
40
Principal '1
stresses '3
150.1 kPa
74.9 kPa
20
-15.2
74.8
Stresses 'H
H-H
H
145.0 kPa
Stresses 'V
V-V
V
80.0 kPa
19.0 kPa
(kPa)
Pole
50
100
150
200
-20
' (kPa)
-40
-60
-19.0 kPa
max /'
50
40
(kPa)
30
max /'
orientation 1
orientation 2
0.355
39.620
-69.931
20
10
Pole
0
-10 0
50
100
150
200
' (kPa)
-20
-30
-40
-50
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(c) From Mohrs diagram the soil has not reached failure
Q6. (a)
With seepage perpendicular to the strata: The flow rate per unit area q/A through each layer is the
same, and the overall head drop H across the full layer thickness D is the sum of the head drops
across each layer n
H Hi
d1
q D q d1 q d 2
A ke A k1 A k 2
D
d2
1 1 d1 d 2
ke D k1 k 2
L
With seepage parallel to strata: The hydraulic gradient H/L is the same for all layers, and so the
total flow rate is given by the sum of the flow rate through each layer:
n
qi ke
d1
H
L
d k
i
H
di
L
D
d2
ke
1
(k1d1 k2d 2
D
L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b)
Permeability test on layered soils A & B:
cross-section area is *502/4 = 1963.5 cm2
i) With overall head difference 120cm Ha = 30 cm Hb = 90 cm and flow rate is 44.2 ml/sec.
hydraulic gradient in A ia = 30/80 = 0.375 and in B ib = 90/40 = 2.25
hence permeability of A ka = 44.2/(0.375*1963.5) = 0.06 cm/sec
and permeability of B kb = 44.2/(2.25*1963.5) = 0.01 cm/sec
overall hydraulic gradient is 120/120 = 1.0
hence effective permeability is 44.2/(1.0*1963.5) = 0.0225 cm/sec. Cross check ok.
ii) With uniform soil type B the flow rate will be given by
0.01*120/120*1963.5 = 19.6 ml/sec
case (i)
140
elevation (cm)
120
100
80
elevation head
60
total head
40
pressure head
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
Heads (cm)
160
case (ii)
140
elevation (cm)
120
100
80
elevation head
60
Series2
40
Series3
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
Heads (cm)
10