Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Maj.Gen.G.S.Narang, 2Dr.PinkyGoswami
1Dean Student Welfare Amity University Lucknow Amity University, Lucknow Campus
Malhaur, GomtinagarExtention, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh : 226028 , India
2Assistant Professor Amity University Haryana
Abstract: The breaking point refers to the point at which a person breaks down, can endure no more, or finally
reaches a point where a permanent change is made. This is typically related to stressful or highly emotional
situations, in which a person will be forced to cope with something that particularly challenges them. The
breaking point for each individual person may be different; some people respond particularly well to stressful
situations, while others have a much lower point at which a situation becomes too much to
endure.Vikranthadbeenadevotedarmysepoy.BeingaRajputfromRajasthan,thecommitmentandchivalry of this
soldierwasexemplary.
However,
life
took
adifferent
turn
for
himwhen
hefoundhimself
understressanddelusion,whichwascaused
byhiswifesinfidelity.Vikrantcouldnotbearthebruntofhispersonallifebeingruinedandrushedtodeathinhaste.
In recent past there has been an increase in suicide and fratricide cases in the Armed forces.
ThefocusofthecaseisBreaking Point(notrelatedto work/organization),itseffectonanindividual and role of the
organisation to prevent such incidents.
Key words: breaking point,aroused emotions,coping behavior, intrapersonal conflict, taxonomy of conflict,
optimum stress,
I.
Introduction
Themanagementofhumanresourcesintodaysfastchangingworldhasacquirednewdimensionsduetothecomplex
interplayofsocial,environmental,biologicaland
culturalfactors,affectinghumanbehavior.Thefamilyvaluesofyesteryears
areanachronismstoday.Theconceptofmodernitybeingpracticedbyoursocietyhasmanifesteditselfintermsofrenewed
culturalbeliefs,socialstandards,genderequality,peerpressure,interpersonalconflictandraisedaspirationconflictand
raisedaspirationlevels.ThemeninArmed
forceshavebeenhitthehardestbyitseffectsduetopeculiarserviceconditions.Theprolonged
separation,inabilitytobewiththefamilyatthetimeofdistressandindifferent
attitudeofrelativestotheir
genuineproblems, addstotheiragony. Thosewhoareunabletocopeupwiththisparadigmshiftsufferfromunbearable
stressleading to their break point.
II.
BreakingpointAnoverview
www.iosrjournals.org
88 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
89 | Page
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20748895
www.iosrjournals.org
90 | Page
III.
1. Whatarethevariouslevelsofconflictsarmypersonnelhastobearwithinhisarmylife?
Trulyaconflictrepresentsagap,adisagreement,contradiction a n d incompatibilityoratensesituationcreated b y the
complicationsinoneslife a n d partiallydue to organizationalapathy.Conflictisaninevitablepart o f individualand
organizationallifehavingdivergentpersonalities,perceptions a n d values.Conflictcan b e atthreedifferentlevels.An
intrapersonalconflictoccurswithintheindividual.Itnormallyoccurs
wh enthereisadisagreementbetweenhowaperson
feelsabouthis/herbehaviorversushowtheyreallyact.Aninterpersonal
conflictisexperiencedbetweenindividualsinthe same location,e.g., co-workers,team membersorasinthiscase
betweenthehusbandandwife. Itexistswheneverpeople interact or come together to accomplish a common goal or
objective.
However
theirbackground,
personalityand
experiences,beingdifferent,maymakeattainmentofthegoal
difficult.Anintra-groupconflictis
definedasconflictbetween
groupsin
thesameorganization.Itoccurswhenever
thereis
contactorinteractionbetweengroups.Issuesof
groupcohesion,stickingtogether,leadershipandstatus,powerorinfluenceandlackoforlimitedresourcesoftencause
sourcesofintergroupconflict.Lackofgoalclarityorintensecompetition
maycauseintra-group
conflict.Thiswashowever
absentinthiscase.Conflictisa,naturalconditionofhuman,lifeandoneofthestates,ofdynamichumanpersonality.A
stateofharmony
istheidealstate.Thetaxonomy,ofconflictasshownbelowdepictstheconflicttoapathycontinuum.
Figure 1 about here
Duringthe,analysisofconflict,thefirststep,istorecognizethelevelof
conflict,from
wherewill,flowoutthefurthercourseof
resolution.
Vikranthadbeenfacingwithanintrapersonalconflict.Intrapersonalconflictispurelyinternal,toapersonandis,
probablythemostdifficult,typeofconflicttoanalyze.Allofushaveneeds.Theseneedsform,thebasisforbehavioratwork
, athome,andeveryactivity wepursue. Intrapersonalconflictarising,duetounfulfilled,expectations,colored,
perceptionand
hurttoselfesteemand,imageincreasesthestresslevel.Also,thethreetypes,ofroles,namely,theexpected,
the
perceivedandthe,actualrolecanresultinroleconflict.Individualconfronted,withroleconflictwilloftenexperience
psychologicalstress,leadingtoemotionalproblems.Moreoftenthannot,itwillbelatentstress,whichwillnotbe
veryovertly visible.Otherissuesconnectedwithintrapersonalconflictare:(a)
Whenthereisa threattoa personsvalues.
(b)
Feelingof unfairtreatment,whichcouldbefrom anybody.
(c)
Multipleandcontradictorysocialcommitments.
(d)
RelatedtotheTheoryof CognitiveDissonance.
Anyindividualconfronted,withroleconflictwillexperience,psychologicalstressleadingtoemotionalproblems.Role
conflictscanhaveamarkedly adverseimpactonsatisfaction,andevenonmentalorphysicalhealth.SepoyVikrantSingh
wasundertremendousstressdueto
umpteennumbersofmixedthoughts,which,werecreatedin
hismindbyhisowninternal conflictsthathewasbattlingalonethroughout.SepoyVikrantSinghsconflictstarted, with
his own personality deterioration. Hewasinatotalturmoilwithhisownselfasregardshiswifeandhissuspicion
ofherhaving
illicitrelationsbasedonhis
perception.Hencehis
personalityhadovertonesofhis
familylife.Hedisplayedthetypicalcharacterofanearlyachieverwith
goodperformance
onthecourse,andhadreachedahighsatisfactionlevelpre-marriage,butduetolatentstresshewas undergoingon his
familyfront alongwithorganizationalapathy, herapidlydegeneratedon theprofessionalfront aswell. But
hispersonalemotionalturmoilwassomuchbottledup insidehimthathecouldnottakeitandcommittedsuicide.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20748895
www.iosrjournals.org
91 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
92 | Page
IV.
Conclusion
www.iosrjournals.org
93 | Page
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
Date
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20748895
www.iosrjournals.org
94 | Page
DOI: 10.9790/0837-20748895
www.iosrjournals.org
95 | Page