Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Facts:
On
27
January
1993,
private
respondent
from
legal
process
except
for
The
Bank's
Headquarters
(the
"Headquarters Agreement").
1. Under
the
Charter
and
Headquarters
time,
rendered
decision
in
favor
When
DFA failed
to
obtain
performed
by
them
in
their
official
granting
privileges
are
commitments
Philippine
these
immunities
treaty
voluntarily
government
covenants
assumed
which
and
and
by
the
must
be
respected.
Being an international organization that has
been extended a diplomatic status, the ADB is
independent of the municipal law. "One of the
basic
immunities
organization
is
of
an
immunity
international
from
local
legal
writs
and
processes
issued
by
the
its
responsibilities
impartially
on
institutions
covered
by
diplomatic
immunities,
There
are
two
conflicting
concepts
of
the
determination
credibility
The DFA
keep
government
regarded.
gestionis.
In
our
the
when
before
of
which,
the
Philippine
international
country, this
agreements
task falls
business
or
trade,
the
particular
act
or
sued
in
an
American
court
requests
the
allowed
the
said
Department
to
file
its
of sovereign immunity.
immunity.
foreign
government
organization
to
first
or
the
secure
international
an
executive
4. Yes.
courts
Catholic
varies.
In
International
Relative
to
the
propriety
of
the
Solicitor
'suggestion'
General
in
embodied
the
manifestation
and
(DFA
vs
NLRC, G.R.
No.
113191,
18
September 1996)
Judge
Romeo
N.
Firme
ordered
defendants
courts order.
of Hagonoy is valid.
limit
Municipality.
claimants
action
"only
up
to
the
law.
Dissolve
objects.
and/or
Preliminary
Discharge
Attachment
the
already
Writ
of
issued,
The
functions
and
public
services
Sabili vs COMELEC
Facts:
1. COMELEC denied Sabilis Certificate of Candidacy
for mayor of Lipa due to failure to comply with the
one year residency requirement.
2. When petitioner filed his COC1 for mayor of Lipa
City for the 2010 elections, he stated therein that he
had been a resident of the city for two (2) years and
eight (8) months.
3. However, it is undisputed that when petitioner filed
his COC during the 2007 elections, he and his family
were then staying at his ancestral home in Barangay
(Brgy.) Sico, San Juan, Batangas.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Issues:
1. Whether the COMELEC committed grave abuse of
discretion in holding that Sabili failed to prove
compliance with the one-year residency requirement
for local elective officials.
Ruling:
1. As a general rule, the Court does not ordinarily
review the COMELECs appreciation and evaluation
of evidence. However, exceptions thereto have been
established, including when the COMELEC's
appreciation and evaluation of evidence become so
grossly unreasonable as to turn into an error of
jurisdiction. In these instances, the Court is
compelled by its bounden constitutional duty to
intervene and correct the COMELEC's error.
2. As a concept, "grave abuse of discretion" defies exact
definition; generally, it refers to "capricious or
whimsical exercise of judgment as is equivalent to
lack of jurisdiction;" the abuse of discretion must be
patent and gross as to amount to an evasion of a
positive duty
3. Mere abuse of discretion is not enough; it must be
grave. We have held, too, that the use of wrong or
irrelevant considerations in deciding an issue is
4.
5.
6.
7.
11.
Aldovino VS COMELEC
12. FACTS:
13. Lucena City councilor Wilfredo F. Asilo was elected
to the said office for three consecutive terms: 19982001, 2001-2004, and 2004-2007. In September 2005,
during his third term of office, the Sandiganbayan
issued an order of 90-day preventive suspension
against him in relation to a criminal case. The said
suspension order was subsequently lifted by the
Court, and Asilo resumed the performance of the
functions of his office.
14. Asilo then filed his certificate of candidacy for the
same position in 2007. His disqualification was
sought by herein petitioners on the ground that he
17.
18. RULING:
19. NO. The preventive suspension of public officials
does not interrupt their term for purposes of the
three-term limit rule under the Constitution and the
Local Government Code (RA 7160).
20.
21. The candidacy of Lucena City Councilor Wilfredo F.
Asilo for a fourth term in the 2007 elections was in
contravention of the three-term limit rule of Art. X,
sec. 8 of the Constitution since his 2004-2007 term
was not interrupted by the preventive suspension
imposed on him, the SC granted the petition of
Simon B. Aldovino, Danilo B. Faller, and Ferdinand N.
Talabong seeking Asilos disqualification.
22. Preventive suspension, by its nature, does not
involve an effective interruption of service within a
term and should therefore not be a reason to avoid
the three-term limitation, held the Court. It noted
that preventive suspension can pose as a threat
more potent than the voluntary renunciation that
the Constitution itself disallows to evade the threeterm limit as it is easier to undertake and merely
requires an easily fabricated administrative charge
that can be dismissed soon after a preventive
suspension has been imposed.