Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Richard Schodde
AMEC Conference, Perth
8th June 2006
Disclaimer
The following presentation is based on an analysis carried out by the author prior to
joining BHP Billiton. It therefore doesnt necessarily reflect the companys business
strategy.
The reported valuations differ from internal BHP Billiton estimates, in part, because
of different assumptions regarding cost of capital and future commodity prices.
Any reference to the word we refers to the minerals industry, not BHP Billiton.
World-Class Deposits
8th June 2006
Page 2
Disclaimer
The views expressed herein contain information derived
from publicly available sources that have not been
independently verified. No representation or warranty is
made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the
information. Any forward-looking information in this
presentation has been prepared on the basis of a number of
assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. This
presentation must not be relied upon as a recommendation
or forecast by BHP Billiton.
Overview
What do we mean by world-class ?
Current definitions and issues associated with them
Proposed definition $250 million NPV threshold
(based on an analysis of 143 significant mineral discoveries)
World-Class Deposits
8th June 2006
Page 4
N = 357
N>3.2 = 179
100
10
Singers threshold
for world-class
gold deposits
3.2
1
1950
World-Class Deposits
8th June 2006
Page 7
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
N = 927
N>2 = 261
100
Copper
Ni Sulfide
Ni Laterite
Lead-Zinc
10
2
Singer threshold
for world-class
copper deposits
0.1
1950
World-Class Deposits
8th June 2006
Page 8
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
World-Class Deposits
8th June 2006
Page 9
NPV approach
100%
80%
Constant
US$400/oz REAL
gold price
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
10
100
-20%
GOLD
Constant
US$400/oz REAL
gold price
$800
Bigger is
better
$600
$400
$200
$0
1
-$200
World-Class Deposits
Page 12 8th June 2006
10
Mt Todd
($236m)
100
Copper
Nickel Laterite
Nickel Sulphide
Lead-Zinc
Other Base metals
BASE METALS
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
1
10
100
-$500
GOLD
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
GOLD
100%
80%
$1,500
60%
$1,000
40%
$500
20%
$0
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0%
100%
GOLD
100%
80%
$1,500
60%
53%
$1,000
40%
$500
20%
$0
12%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0%
100%
100%
GOLD
$1,500
80%
60%
53%
$1,000
40%
$500
$250
$0
20%
A
12%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0%
100%
Number
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
12%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number
$1,500
Tonnes
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
12%
20%
30%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number
$1,500
Tonnes
NPV
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
12%
20%
30%
40%
53%
60%
80%
100%
Number
BASE METALS
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
14%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number
Tonnes
BASE METALS
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
14%
20%
32%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number
Tonnes
Tax
$1,500
BASE METALS
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
14%
20%
32%
59%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number
Tonnes
Tax
NPV
$1,500
BASE METALS
$1,000
$500
$250
$0
0%
14%
20%
32%
59%
40%
60%
67%
80%
100%
Appears to be
a step-change
above $250m
$1,000
Gold
Copper
Nickel Sulphide
Nickel Laterite
Lead-Zinc
Diamonds
$500
$0
Deposit
World-Class Deposits
Page 25 8th June 2006
Diamonds
Lead-Zinc
Gold
Nickel Sulphide
Nickel Laterite
Copper
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
-$500
10
15
20
1000
GOLD
N = 307
100
10
1
0.1
10
100
1000
Not Modeled
GOLD
NPV Modeled
Nmodeled = 63
100
10
1
0.1
10
100
1000
Not Modeled
NPV <US$250m
NPV >US$250m
GOLD
N>$250m = 7
100
10
1
0.1
6 10
100
BASE METALS
N = 151
100
10
1
0.1
10
100
World-Class Deposits
Page 30 8th June 2006
Not Modeled
BASE METALS
NPV Modeled
Nmodeled = 74
100
10
1
0.1
10
100
World-Class Deposits
Page 31 8th June 2006
Not Modeled
NPV <US$250m
NPV >US$250m
BASE METALS
NiS
N>$250m = 10
brownfield
100
NiS
Cu
Cu
10
Cu
Cu
Cu
Zn
Cu
Cu
1
0.1
10
100
World-Class Deposits
Page 32 8th June 2006
$1,000
$500
$0
Deposit
World-Class Deposits
Page 33 8th June 2006
World-Class Deposits
Page 34 8th June 2006
Number of Discoveries
$6
30
Total Expenditures
Tier 2 discoveries (NPV $50-250m)
Tier 1 (ie World-Class) discoveries
25
20
$5
$4
15
$3
10
$2
Incomplete
data
$1
$0
0
1980
1985
1990
2 to 4 world-class deposits
are found each year in WW
World-Class Deposits
Page 35 8th June 2006
1995
2000
2005
World-Class Deposits
Page 36 8th June 2006
World-Class Deposits
Page 37 8th June 2006
10
100 moz
1
Note: Excludes
deposits <100 koz
0.1 moz
1 moz
10 moz
0.1
0.1
10
100
1000
10000
100
Bigger is better !
10
100 moz
1
Note: Excludes
deposits <100 koz
0.1 moz
1 moz
10 moz
0.1
0.1
10
100
1000
10000
1.0%
10 mt Cu
0.1 mt Cu
1 mt Cu
0.1%
1
10
100
1000
10000
NPV >$250m
NPV $100m to $250m
10.0%
NPV $0 to $99m
NPV negative
Not modeled
Need at least
0.8% Cu
1.0%
10 mt Cu
0.1 mt Cu
1 mt Cu
0.1%
1
10
100
1000
10000
Size of footprint
10
0.1
Ore
0.01
0.1
10
100
1000
Size of footprint
10
Ore
Sulphides
0.1
0.01
0.1
10
100
1000
Size of footprint
10
Ore
Sulphides
Alteration
0.1
0.01
0.1
10
100
1000
Size of footprint
Giant orebodies
have big footprints
10
Ore
Sulphides
Alteration
0.1
0.01
0.1
5 mt
10
100
1000
which will lower costs and increase the economic resource base
World-Class Deposits
Page 46 8th June 2006
Resources
Reserves
30
20
10
1988: Grasberg
discovered
Cumulative
production
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
0
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Source: FCX
World-Class Deposits
Page 47 8th June 2006
2020
Actual Production
800
600
400
200
0
1960
1980
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 48 8th June 2006
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
600
400
200
1983
0
1960
1980
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 49 8th June 2006
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
600
400
200
1983
1986
0
1960
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 50 8th June 2006
1980
1990
1980
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
600
400
1989
200
1983
1986
0
1960
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 51 8th June 2006
1980
1990
1980
2000
1988: Grasberg
discovered
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
600
400
1992
1989
200
1983
1986
0
1960
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 52 8th June 2006
1980
1990
1980
2000
1988: Grasberg
discovered
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
600
1995
400
1992
1989
200
1983
1986
0
1960
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 53 8th June 2006
1980
1990
1980
2000
1988: Grasberg
discovered
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
1999
600
1995
400
1992
1989
200
1983
1986
0
1960
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 54 8th June 2006
1980
1990
1980
2000
1988: Grasberg
discovered
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Actual Production
800
1999
2002
2005
600
1995
400
1992
1989
200
1983
1986
0
1960
1970
1960: Ertsberg
discovered
World-Class Deposits
Page 55 8th June 2006
1980
1990
1980
2000
1988: Grasberg
discovered
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
World-Class Deposits
Page 56 8th June 2006
Conclusions
World-class mines by definition are something special. They produce major
benefits to industry and society.
Better to define them in terms of wealth creation than physical size.
Deposits with NPV >$250m appear to have different size-frequency characteristics
an artefact of being of being part of a camp?
To have a reasonable chance of being world-class the deposit needs to contain
>6 Moz Au or >4-5 mt of Cu-equivalent ( = 1.0-1.3Mt Ni = 10-12 Mt Zn).
On average 2-4 world-class deposits were found each year in the Western World.
Economic analysis of 143 major deposits found between 1985-2003 showed that
much of the industrys wealth is captured in a handful of discoveries.
For gold: Of those >0.5 mt Cu-equiv, 12% by number had an NPV>$250m.
These contained 30% of the metal and 53% of the total wealth.
For base metals: Of those >1 moz Au, 14% by number had an NPV>$250m.
These contained 32% of the metal and 67% of the total wealth.
World-Class Deposits
Page 57 8th June 2006
World-Class Deposits
Page 58 8th June 2006