How far has China economic reforms affected its governance and international
image since 1978?
1978 can be said to be a turning point in Chinas governance and international image where thereon China increasingly attracted global attention to its development due to the potential it has as a market and subsequently even to become a global player. While the country retains its authoritarian rule and remains ideologically different from most other countries in the world even today, consequences of economic success have changed the realities within and without China, compelling the CCP to run the country and project its global image differently. Hence, this essay seeks to argue that economic reforms have radically transformed the governance and international image of China as it is imperative for China to adapt to the changing socio-economic realities should it continue to be an economic powerhouse. Domestically, economic reforms have radically changed the legitimacy of CCPs rule by bringing in other pillars of legitimacy. Whereas the past communism formed the premise of CCPs legitimacy to rule, the amount of money squandered through corruption scandals since economic reforms brought in wealth have blatantly contradicted the egalitarian principle the party is supposed to follow such that communism can no longer be the foundation of legitimacy. The absence of competitive political process and free press which make even public sector susceptible to fraud, thefts, kickbacks and bribery only further serves to weaken CCPs mandate to rule. As a result, other pillars of legitimacy like nationalism, civil governance and populism had to be added to support CCPs legitimacy and governance to rule as such no longer followed the Maoist principles it once did. However, by bringing in prosperity for the people, economic reforms help in persisting the authoritarian rule of CCP in the country and keeping the partys rule largely unchallenged and without popular opposition. Economic prosperity has been the line of defense for CCP that have made it possible for a large majority of the people to stay at least passively acceptant of CCPs authoritarian rule. Due to the success of economic reforms, living standards for both the rural residents and the urbanites have vastly and greatly improved. Since Chinas opening up, 400million people have been lifted out of poverty. In 2003 alone, in spite of the outbreak of SARS, 13million jobs were created. Real income for rural residents grew by 4.3%. CCP, with its promise of people-centered development to the country, has been able to gain the continual support of the people to unite with it in spurring the Chinese economy. 20.95trillion yuan raked in in 2006 shows that CCP has been successful at uniting the people through economic development, and at the same time safeguard its legitimacy as people are kept content with the status quo. The economic successes of the CCP have caused the emergence of a middle class in China that largely supports the CCP for fear of rocking the boat of prosperity. As such, economic reforms have the reverse impact in persisting the authoritarian rule of CCP in the country. Globally, ties between China and other countries have become closer as it becomes the land of innumerable economic opportunities with economic reforms. Chinas vast cheap labour supply and pro-business government made it the favourite manufacturing and investment hub for foreign businesses. Businesses from around the world are also eager to sell their produce in the huge Chinese market. China pulled Japan and later Korea out form their recessions since 1990s. Both developed countries from the West and states of the
developing continent are dependent on cheap Chinese manufactured imports.
Countries like Australia and South Africa relied on the Chinese demands for the export of their primary resources. This is especially so after the developed economies began to falter during the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. As such, economic reforms have radically changed Chinas image by improving its relevancy to the rest of the world. However, Chinas expanding political influences as a result of its economic ascendency have caused concerned amongst many countries. The US and EU are wary of Chinese expansion on the African continent. Rising popularity of the Beijing Consensus amongst governments of the developing nations especially after 2009 alarmed the western democracies to their declining influence. Countries like Russia, India and Indonesia are fearful of their economic dependency on China, which might translate to political vulnerabilities. Rapidly growing yet opaque budget of the Chinese military has become the concern of many nations. Chinas newfound confidence after 2009, as displayed in its diplomatic assertiveness during the Copenhagen Climate Summit and aggressive against perceived anti-China measures undertaken by the west, has been watched with apprehension by many government. Hence, economic reforms in this sense, may have the reverse impact of spoiling Chinas positive image by overcasting it with suspicion. Nevertheless, Dengs economic reforms have radically transformed the international image of China from a closed communist country to a more capitalist and potentially democratic one. Since Chinas opening up in 1978, she has become a more welcomed ally of the West against the USSR during the Cold War. Between 1979 to 1989 the world saw China as less of an ideological and military threat, given the economic opportunities it offered. Coupled with the practice of Panda diplomacy, economic reforms transformed the international relations China had with others for the better. Still, Chinas economic policies, overseas expansion, aggressive acquisition of food and other resources, have nonetheless aroused fear and suspicion around the world. Western economies have often accused China of protectionism, dumping, copyright infringements and other unfair trade practices. Trade wars between China and the West such as the US and EU have become more common especially after 2009. Even developing countries are unhappy with competition from cheap Chinese products. Faulty products and poisoned food from China have strained its relations with some countries. Many countries are alarmed by Chinas arms sales and support for dictatorial regimes in Africa, in return for oil and other resources. Chinese attempts to purchase foreign industries of strategic importance have aroused fears in some states. For example, Chinese stakes in Americas Blackstone Inc.; failed Chinese bid to buy over RioTinto of Australia and UNOCAL in the US. In conclusion, China today continues to retain its authoritarian rule and remains reputably ideologically different from most other countries even with economic reforms. However, with the socio-economic realities changing, China has nevertheless been compelled to govern and project its global image differently. Therefore, by and large economic reforms have radically transformed the governance and international image of China as it is imperative for China to adapt to the changing socio-economic realities since continuing to be an economic powerhouse is the only way forward for China.