Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
the Social Democratic Party of Germany in 1932 to oppose fascism in Germany and was deprived of
his honorary professorship by Adolf Hitler in 1933.[25]
Corporate solidarism[edit]
mile Durkheim.
Sociologist mile Durkheim advocated a form of corporatism termed "solidarism" that advocated
creating an organic social solidarity of society through functional representation.[26] Solidarism was
based upon Durkheim's view that the dynamic of human society as a collective is distinct from that of
an individual, in that society is what places upon individuals their cultural and social attributes. [27]
Durkheim claimed that in the economy, solidarism would alter the division of labour by changing it
from the mechanical solidarity to organic solidarity. Durkheim claimed that the existing
industrial capitalist division of labour caused "juridical and moral anomie" which had no norms or
agreed procedures to resolve conflicts resulting in chronic confrontation between employers and
trade unions.[26] Durkheim believed that this anomie caused social dislocation and claimed that by
this "[i]t is the law of the strongest which rules, and there is inevitably a chronic state of war, latent or
acute".[26] As a result, Durkheim claimed it is a moral obligation of the members of society to end this
situation by creating a moral organic solidarity based upon professions as organized into a single
public institution.[28]
Liberal corporatism[edit]
The idea of liberal corporatism has also been attributed to English liberal philosopher John Stuart
Mill who discussed corporatist-like economic associations as needing to "predominate" in society to
create equality for labourers and give them influence with management by economic democracy.
[29]
Unlike some other types of corporatism, liberal corporatism does not reject capitalism
or individualism, but believes that the capitalist companies are social institutions that should require
their managers to do more than maximize net income, by recognizing the needs of their employees.
[30]
This liberal corporatist ethic is similar to Taylorism but endorses democratization of capitalist
companies. Liberal corporatists believe that inclusion of all members in the election of management
in effect reconciles "ethics and efficiency, freedom and order, liberty and rationality". [30] Liberal
corporatism began to gain disciples in the United States during the late 19th century.[5]
Liberal corporatism was an influential component of the Progressivism in the United States that has
been referred to as "interest group liberalism".[31] In the United States, economic corporatism
involving capital-labour cooperation was influential in the New Deal economic program of the United
States in the 1930s as well as in Keynesianism and even Fordism.[22]
Fascist corporatism[edit]
Part of a series on
Fascism
Core tenets[show]
Topics[show]
Ideas[show]
People[show]
Literature[show]
Organizations[show]
History[show]
Lists[show]
Related topics[show]
Fascism portal
Politics portal
This non-elected form of state officializing of every interest into the state was professed to reduce
the marginalization of singular interests (as would allegedly happen by the unilateral end condition
inherent in the democratic voting process). Corporatism would instead better recognize or
"incorporate" every divergent interest into the state organically, according to its supporters, thus
being the inspiration for their use of the term totalitarian, perceivable to them as not meaning a
coercive system but described distinctly as without coercion in the 1932 Doctrine of Fascism as thus: