Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a)
b)
Fig. 8. The deformed shape of the steel structure a)of failure of an
element situated on the lower part of the truss, b) the case of an element
from the upper side of the truss
c)
Fig. 9. The initial deformed shape
Table 1: The displacements of the structure in the studied cases
Lower side element failure
Maximum
displacement
from adjacent
trusses
UX (cm)
UY (cm)
UZ (cm)
-4.10
9.70
-11.80
-3.10
9.50
-11.50
-3.00
9.60
-8.90
After the verification on the adjacent trusses the fact that those dont
collapse from a point of view of resistance and stability was seen. The
verification of the steel elements was made according to Eurocode 3. In
table 2 the values of the computing force (NE) divided by the portant
capacity (Nd) are given in some characteristic sections of the adjacent
trusses of the collapsed truss. Were taken into account the models with the
failure of lower part of the truss (a), the upper part of the truss (b) and they
were compared to the initial base moment (c).
In figures 10 and 11 the percentage of participation of all the
elements from the adjacent main trusses and one may observe an increasing
of those after the accidental loading from a maximum of 0.4 to a new
maximum of 0.7.
Verified
Section
1. T inf 7
2. T sup 5
3. 2U 180
Fraction
b) Failure of element
from upper part of
the main truss
c) Initial
structure
a/c
b/c
0,26
0,17
0,54
0,23
0,11
0,37
1,26
1,27
1,97
1,13
1,55
1,46
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
108
Fig.10. The analysis of stresse from the elements from the adjacent trusses
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
108