Stan J Caterbone OPEN Federal Cases in US DISTRICT COURT Eastern PA July 10, 2015

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
7/6/2015
FAX
To:
Phone:
Fax Contact List

Not Available
Company Name:
Fax:
Fax Contact List
Fax Contact List
From: Stan Caterbone

Phone: (717) 669669-2163
Company Name: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Fax: (717) 459-7588
Number of Pages: 66 Plus Cover

Urgent: Yes
Action Requested: Quick Settlement

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 669-2163
(717) 459-7588 Fax
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Advanced Media Group Press Release For Organized
Stalking and Directed Energy Devices
2. Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus of May 22, 20141
U.S. District Court Docket
3. Stan J. Caterbone Cover Page of Amicus
4. Stan J. Caterbone Recorded Amicus in U.S. District Court
5. ORDER of U.S. District Court Judge Paul Diamond of
May 22, 2014
scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Page 1
Monday, July 06, 2015
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Page 2
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Page 3
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Page 4
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Page 5
Hon. P. Michael Sturla

8 North Queen Street
Suite 1100 The Griest Building
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-3157
Fax: (717) 295-7816
Hon. P. Michael Sturla
120 Main Capitol Building
PO Box 202096
Harrisburg, PA 17120-2096
(717) 787-3555
Fax: (717) 705-1923
Hon. Bryan Cutler
207 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
(717) 786-4551
Fax: (717) 786-3645
Hon. Bryan Cutler
147A East Wing
PO Box 202100
(717) 783-6424
Fax: (717) 772-9859
Hon. John M. Perzel
7518 Frankford Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19136
(215) 331-2600
Fax: (215) 708-3135
Hon. John M. Perzel
PO Box 202172
(717) 787-2016
Fax: (717) 783-7225
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
610 North 2nd Street
(215) 503-3245
Fax: (215) 503-7850
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
107 East Wing
PO Box 202175
(717) 783-8098
Fax: (717) 780-4787
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

852 Village Rd.,Municipal
Bldg
P.O. Box 268
Lampeter, PA 17537
(717) 464-5285
Fax: (717) 295-7817
Hon. Matthew E. Baker

115 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202068
(717) 772-5371
Fax: (717) 705-1850
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

432 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202043
(717) 783-6422
Fax: (717) 787-7731
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Judiciary, Chairman
645 Penn Street, 2nd Floor
Reading, PA 19601
(610) 376-1529
Fax: (610) 378-4406
Hon. Katie True

2938 Columbia Avenue
Manor West Commons, Suite
501
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-5050
Fax: (717) 295-5053
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

106 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202127
(717) 787-3525
Fax: (717) 772-5401
Hon. Katie True

7 East Wing
PO Box 202041
(717) 705-7161
Fax: (717) 705-1946
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver,
Health & Human Services,
Chairman
2839 West Girard Avenue
(215) 684-3738
Fax: (215) 235-4629
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver
34E East Wing
PO Box 202195
(717) 787-3480
Fax: (717) 783-0684
Hon. Matthew E. Baker
Health & Human Services,
Chairman74 Main Street
Wellsboro, PA 16901
(570) 724-1390
Fax: (570) 724-2168
Page 6
Hon. Ron Marsico

Judiciary, Chairman
4401 Linglestown Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
(717) 652-3721
Fax: (717) 652-6276
Hon. Ron Marsico
218 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202105
(717) 783-2014
Fax: (717) 705-2010
Hon. Camille Bud George,
Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
275 Spring Street
Houtzdale, PA 16651
(814) 378-6279
Fax: (814) 765-0609
Hon. Camille Bud George
38B East Wing
PO Box 202074
(717) 787-7316
Fax: (717) 783-8236
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
302 Seneca Street
Oil City, PA 16301
(814) 677-6363
Fax: (814) 676-1653
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson
PO Box 202064
(717) 783-8188
Fax: (717) 705-1945
Lloyd K. Smucker (R)
Senate District 13
Lancaster (part) and York (part)
Counties.
Senate Box 203013
Harrisburg, PA 17120-3013 185
Main Capitol
(717) 787-6535
D.O. ADDRESS:
44 North Christian Street
Suite 100
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 397-1309
lsmucker@pasen.gov
http://senatorsmucker.com
Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Senate District 15
Dauphin (part) and York
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203015
173 Capitol Building
(717) 787-6801
D.O. ADDRESS:
916-B Park Plaza
North River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
(717) 896-7714
jpiccola@pasen.gov:
http://www.piccola.org
Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Senate District 36
Chester (part) and Lancaster
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203036
16 East Wing
(717) 787-4420
FAX: (717) 783-3156
D.O. ADDRESS:
301 East Main Street
Lititz, PA 17543
(717) 627-0036
mbrubaker@pasen.gov
http://senatorbrubaker.com
Page 7
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Page 8
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Page 9
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?12332875607261-L_1_0-1
CLOSED,HABEAS,A/R
United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv-02559-PD
LAMBERT v. BISSONETTE et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND
Cause: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Date Filed: 05/02/2014

Date Terminated: 05/22/2014
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus:
(General)
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT
represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY H.
GONZALEZ IBRAHIM
P.O. BOX 1025
CHADDS FORD, PA 19317
215-568-1943
Email: jeremyibrahim.esq@verizon.net
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Respondent
LYNN BISSONETTE
SUPERINTENDENT,
MCI-FRAMINGHAM
Respondent
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
PENNSYLVANIA
V.
Movant
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
PRO SE
6/28/2015 9:08 AM
2 of 2
Date Filed
# clear Docket Text
05/02/2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number

100526.), filed by LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover
Sheet)(ks, ) (Entered: 05/05/2014)
05/22/2014
CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA

MICHELLE LAMBERT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON
5/22/14. 5/22/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd) (Entered:
05/22/2014)
05/22/2014
ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S

COUNSEL. ACCORDINGLY HER HABEAS PETITION IS DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A COUNSELED
MOTION FOR RELIEF. COUNSEL SHOULD BE PREPARED TO ADDRESS
WHETHER PETITIONER MUST SEEK PERMISSION FROM THE COURT OF
APPEALS BEFORE FILING A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS
PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/22/14.
5/23/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND
E-MAILED. (jpd) (Entered: 05/23/2014)
06/23/2015
BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S
HABEAU CORPUS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jpd) (Entered: 06/25/2015)
or
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
06/28/2015 09:07:01
PACER
Login:
am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Billable Pages: 1
Search
Criteria:
5:14-cv02559-PD
Cost:
0.10
6/28/2015 9:08 AM
Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 52
1o: c.;1erK
t-'age
LUl::>-Uf-Ul u:::i:ob:U4 {GMI)
or b
"
17174597588 From: Stan Caterbone
FAX COVER SHEET

TO
Clerk
COMPANY
Clerk of Courts USED
FAX NUMBER
12155976390
FROM
Stan Caterbone
DATE
2015-07-01 09:51:08 GMT
RE
LambertAmicusCase No.5: 14-cv-02559-PD
COVER MESSAGE
July 1, 2015
PleaseReviewAttached
StanJ. Caterbone
717-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
WWW.EFAX.COM
To: Clerk
:lU1 o-u1-u1 U!::l:oo:U4 (GM 1J
Page 2 of 6
Prim
https: //us-111g6.mai I. yahoo. com/neo/1 aunch? .rand=fc.o7k02vt72oo

Subject:
HATE CRIMES?
From:
Stan J. Caterbone (scaterbone@live.com)
To:
bearingc@police.co.Jancaster.pa.us;
Date:
Wednesday, July 1, 2 015 4 :51 AM
July 1, 2015
To:
Detective Clark Bearinger, Lancaster City Police Department

Detective James R Zahm, County Detective/SERT Commander
Detective Michael Landis, Chief Detective of Lancaster County
Detective Larry Ma1tin, County of Lancaster
Detective William Chalfant, County of Lancaster
cc:
Mr. Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney

Mr. Kieth Sadler, Chief of Police, Lancaster City Police Department
Mr. Richard Gray, Lancaster City Mayor
Ms. Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General
U.S. Attorney General of the United States
Re:
Computer and Cellphone Hacking
I. Tam a Federal Whistleblmver as defined by the law regarding Tnternational Signal & Control or TSC
(1987)
2. l am a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control or Targeted Individual (Tl)
3. My father and brother were the same
4. I do have ~)'nthetic telepathy (full time since 2005)
5. I have met with or commwlicated with all of you regarding my computericellphone hacking on several
occasions
6. Thave followed your instructions on how to proceed in enlisting a private firm to scan my computer
7. My complaints have been well articulated and my evidence to the same have been well documented
8. I have always presented myselfin a respected manner and have been civil in our meeting.-;
9. My complaints have been rebuffed by all of you
10. Your actions have put my life and property in a dire state-of-affairs
l l. The Gang Stalkers have taken note of your actions and have demonstrated that they feel you have
supported their attitude that if it is legal for you to harass me that they have the same legal right to do
the same
12. 111e computer/cellphone hacking has caused me undo in1luence, stress, and problems filing my
Amicus in the US. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 5: I 4-cv-02559-PD,
Lisa Michell Lambert Habeus Corpus

13. As of June 23, 2015 I am formally and officially named as a Pa11.y in the above mentioned case as the
Movant
14. The above constitute OBSTRUCTTON OF DUE PROCESS, a federal crime
15. I am officially considered DISABLED by the Social Security Administration (SSA) as of December I,
2005 and was awarded benefits due to the same since April of 2008, which places my situation under the
American Disabilities Act of 1990 \Vhich prohibits Discrimination ofall kinds
16. The SSA has awarded me benefits for the illness and symptoms of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com
l of 2
7/1/201.5 5:1.8 AM
1o: 1,.;1erK
Print
!-'age
:.!Ulo-ur-01 09:56:04 (GMT)
or b
https://us-nig6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=fco7k02vt72oo
l 7. Since May l 2, 2015 or about my life has been under threat and harassment, as well as that of my family
l 8. There is more reason to believe that according to Federal Statutes LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT's
Habeus Corpus will be successful and she will be released from prison in the near future
19. You all have no one to blame but yourselves for the consequences of you actions and you all have proven
my case as defined in my Amicus filing
20. Your actions are directly defined in the C01NTELPRO definitions, which is illegal under U.S. law
21. Your actions are clearly in line with the US. Sponsored Mind Control mandamus operandi which has a
goal of pushing the victim, or Targeted Individual (TI) to suicide
22. I have provide the County of Lancaster, including you, with my documentation of all of the above
ALL OF THE ABOVE DOC'.m'IENTATION CAN BE VIE\\''ED Al~D DO\\'NLOADED BY VISITING

MY LIBRARY OF DOCUMENTS AT 1HE FOLLO\VL.~G LINK: bttps://www.scribd.com
/stan5j.5caterbone'?tah=documents OR BY VISITING W\\l\V.SCRTBD.COM AND SEARCHING FOR
STAN J. CATERBONE
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media Group are victims of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged In litigation in both Federal and Stat~ courts seeking financial
remedies and a resolution of his Civil Uberties and his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing
the financial firm the he founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whlstieblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer and local start-up
International Signal & Control, Pie., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S.
history, some $1 Biiiion and selling arms to Irag via South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa MicheUe Lambert.
2 of2
7/l/201.5 5:18 AM
2010-01-01
0~:00:04
(C;;M 1 J
111
t4::i~t::i!j!j
i-rom:
~tan
c...;ateroone
To: Clerk
Page 5 of 6
2015-07-01 09:56:04 (GMT)

~:~'**'~ct'.*-*tH:1::!>;i:;F,*****~*:1'~::$.:f.*;~*+***~'***'*'**
C US T D ~ E R AGR E E ME NT
:f:'!'***"'**~'*************'i'tt~***********"'~***
Ver tzori ~i!i re-1 es.s

HOO Fruitville Pike
Lancaster.I PA
17601~4098
(7'17) 291M6591
www ~ veri zonw ire 1'ess, com
Ord.er Nuu1ber ~
Order Locat'ion~
42'!303
04598 01
PS.
04596 01
Hece1ve Loc?ition~
Hece!pt Data/Time:
Rep:
D6/j0/~?.015 17; 37 ET
schoctt~EGG40
51
Rt:!Jl$ter.~
L~ne 1
Mob 11 e Nwnbe r:
C7H)
Device IO:
68:l~Zit33
3588200527475810
s-e14sooooo11005s~rsas
ICC.ID:
~~-~-~-~~---~----------
Date of AcHvattcn:
k~Clnt.ract .End Date .:
Ot)/30/20 t 5
Line Access:
LOYAL TY UNL T'l\Lk i; TXT
1GB $SO
$50 .C!O iriont h'ly

Cost Per- Month
Oec.1ine Equf.pment
Protection
$0,00
The iPhone 1s conflgurr;v:1 to Nork only

V.i;rfzon
\~ith tt1e iidrnh:ss se:r~'ices {1f

~~i r"t~ less~ a.nd may not. 1,~1ork or!
attother
carri.er"s nch1or-k, aven after- .completion
of your contn1ct term.
Please
Note~ F-~at.ures
and services
may net be cumpatib1e with
an
deviteEL
A 'i/ar1z.on ~1li re1ess SIM may tn1ly be

usr:d ilith devices certHled for use on
Verizon Wi re12ss~; n(~t{~~ork ~
YCli ean c\1gc~ \ f o/OUr device 15

certlfiKi at
...i1.um~L..\i.8l.J...~n.;,'J.W.JsE.1.t3S$..,..i:..'1r1~~!.C.tif.leddav1.c.e
To: Clerk
Page 6 ot 6
:.!Ulo-U/-Ul U!::l:oo:U4 (GM I)
****~*************************************
PAYMENT
R E C E I P T
Verizon Wireless
1700 Fruit.ville Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601-4093
(717) 291-6591
wv1w. verizonwireless. com
427303
04593 01
Order Number:
Order Location:
Order Type:
Receive Location:
Receipt Date/Time:
Rep:
Register:
PS
04598 01
06/30/2015 17:37 ET
schocti-EGG40
51
Pmt 1 of 1
Payment Type:
Retail
Price
Item
Tot.al Due *:
Total Savings:
This Payment
Sale
Price
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Customer Recycling Disclosure:

Electronic waste should be recycled or
disposed of properly. contact http://
www.depweb.stat.e.pa.us or
1-800-346-4242 for information.
Return Policy:
New and Certified Pre-Owned merchandise
items may only be returned or exchanged
within 14 days (07/14/2015).
You are permitted to make one exchangt'!.
A restocking fee of $35($70 for Net.books,
Tablets and Notebooks) applies to any
return or exchange of a wireless device

(excluding Hawaii) .
.See verizon~Jireless. com/returnpolicy for
complete details.
To receive a credit for the act:ivation
fee, cancellations must occur within
3 days of activation of service.
Thank You
The NEW Mv Verizon.
All The Tools.
All The Features.

More Convenience.
Visit verizonwi:r:eless.com for moi:-e.
**************************************
Visit www.Verizonwirelesssurvey.com to
tell us about. your experience.
****No .Signature Required****
Ill Ill II llll II Illllll II llllllllll 1111111111111111

VZJD4598010000427303
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT,
Petitioner,
v.
LYNN BISSONETTE, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 14-2559
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED that
Jeremy Ibrahim, Esq. is appointed as Petitioners Counsel.
Accordingly, her
Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice to

Petitioners right to file a counseled Motion for relief.
Petitioners Counsel should be prepared to address whether Petitioner must
seek permission from the Court of Appeals before filing a second or successive
habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. 2244, 2254.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond

_________________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
1 of 6
CLOSED

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv-02288-MAM
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
Case in other court: USCA for the 3rd Circuit, 06-03955
USCA Third Circuit, 07-04474
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Jury Demand: Defendant
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON
TERMINATED: 06/13/2006
represented by ROBERT W. HALLINGER

APPEL & YOST LLP
33 NORTH DUKE ST
LANCASTER, PA 17602
717-394-0521
Email: rhallinger@appelyost.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT.
represented by CHRISTOPHER S. UNDERHILL

HARTMAN UNDERHILL & BRUBAKER LLP
221 E. CHESTNUT ST.
LANCASTER, PA 17602-2782
717-299-7254
Fax: 717-299-3160
Email: chrisu@hublaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
Defendant
STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPT.
Defendant
AVALON POLICE EPT.
represented by WALTER H. SWAYZE , III

SEGAL, MCCAMBRIDGE, SINGER & MAHONEY
1818 MARKET ST STE 2600
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
215-972-8015
Email: pswayze@smsm.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
PATRICIA BAXTER
CRUSER & ,MITCHELL, LLP
Two Penn Center, Suite 1700
1500 John F. Kennedy Boulevard
215-543-3681
Email: pbaxter@cmlawfirm.com
Defendant
COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK
i.e. MELLON BANK
represented by GEORGE M. GOWEN , III

COZEN O'CONNOR
ONE LIBERTY PLACE
1650 Market Street
7/9/2015 7:41 PM
2 of 6
215-665-2000
Fax: 215-665-2013
Email: ggowen@cozen.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
STUART A. WEISS
COZEN O'CONNOR
1900 MARKET STREET
215-665-2000
Email: sweiss@cozen.com
Defendant
SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPT.
Defendant
LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Defendant
FULTON BANK
represented by GEORGE C. WERNER

BARLEY SNYDER
126 EAST KING STREET
717-299-5201
Fax: 717-291-4660
Email: gwerner@barley.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
STEPHANIE CARFLEY
MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
570 LAUSCH LANE
SUITE 200
717-581-3724
Email: scarfley@mwn.com
Date Filed
05/16/2005
1 COMPLAINT against defts' FULTON BANK, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., STONE
HARBOR POLICE DEPT., AVALON POLICE EPT., COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK, SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE
DEPT., LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 916844.), filed by plff STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.(gn, ) (Entered: 01/12/2006)
Docket Text
05/16/2005
Summons Issued as to defts' FULTON BANK, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., STONE
HARBOR POLICE DEPT., AVALON POLICE EPT., COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK, SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE
DEPT., LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. Forwarded To: pro se on 5/16/05 (gn, ) (Entered: 01/12/2006)
05/16/2005
2 MOTION TO SEAL THE COMPLAINT, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on
11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/12/2006)
01/06/2006
3 ORDER THAT THE PLFF SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 1/25/06. IF THE PLFF DOES
NOT DO SO, THE COURT WILL DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL CONSIDER THE
PLFF'S REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND FOR A HEARING AFTER THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ARE
SERVICED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLFF'S MOTION TO FILE THE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL IS DENIED. (
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/5/06.) 1/9/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (gn, ) Additional
attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/12/2006)
01/23/2006
4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re Summons and Complaint was served upon Fulton Bank by certified
mail (no green card attached). (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/24/2006)
01/23/2006
5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served Summons and Complaint upon deft Lancaster County Sheriffs
Dept by certified mail ( no green card attached). (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/24/2006)
7/9/2015 7:41 PM
3 of 6
01/23/2006
6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Manheim Township Police
Dept. by certified mail ( no green card attached) (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/24/2006)
01/23/2006
7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Stone Harbor Police Dept.
by certified mail ( no green card attached) (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/24/2006)
01/23/2006
8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Commonwealth National
Bank (Mellon Bank, N.A.) by certified mail (no green card attached). (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ).
(Entered: 01/24/2006)
01/23/2006
9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Lancaster County Prison by
certified mail ( no green card attached). (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/24/2006)
01/23/2006
10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by STANLEY J. CATERBONE re served summons and complaint upon deft Avalon Police Dept. by
certified mail ( no green card attached). (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 01/24/2006)
02/06/2006
11 Praecipe for Entry of Appearance by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., Certificate of Service. (UNDERHILL,
CHRISTOPHER) Modified on 2/7/2006 (np). (Entered: 02/06/2006)
02/06/2006
12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT..Brief, Affidavit, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 02/06/2006)
02/06/2006
13 Memorandum of Law in Support re 12 MOTION to Dismiss by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT.. (UNDERHILL,
CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 02/06/2006)
02/06/2006
14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, 13 Memorandum of Law in
Support (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 02/06/2006)
02/08/2006
15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK.Memorandum, Certificate of
Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Memorandum of Law# 3 Certificate of Service)(GOWEN, GEORGE) (Entered:
02/08/2006)
02/09/2006
16 Praecipe to Enter Appearance by FULTON BANK; Jury Demand, Certificate of Service. (CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) Modified on
2/9/2006 (np). (Entered: 02/09/2006)
02/09/2006
17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FULTON BANK.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(CARFLEY,
STEPHANIE) (Entered: 02/09/2006)
02/09/2006
18 BRIEF in Support re 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FULTON BANK, Certificate of Service. (CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) Modified on
2/13/2006 (np). (Entered: 02/09/2006)
02/09/2006
19 ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFT MELLON BANK FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER IS GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY
FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DEADLINE FOR MELLON'S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED BY 14 DAYS.
. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 2/9/06.2/9/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (lvj, ) (Entered:
02/09/2006)
02/23/2006
20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK.Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text
of Proposed Order # 2 Memorandum of Law# 3 Certificate of Service)(WEISS, STUART) (Entered: 02/23/2006)
03/06/2006
21 Request for MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution Be Granted filed by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., Certificate of
Service. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) Modified on 3/7/2006 (np). (Entered: 03/06/2006)
04/10/2006
22 NOTICE by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE for continuance. (gn, ) (wrd, ). (Entered: 04/10/2006)
04/12/2006
23 ORDER THAT THE CASE SHALL BE PLACED IN CIVIL SUSPENSE UNTIL 5/11/06. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/11/06. ) 4/12/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 04/12/2006)
04/26/2006
24 NOTICE of Appearance by PATRICIA BAXTER on behalf of AVALON POLICE EPT. with JURY DEMAND & CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE (BAXTER, PATRICIA) (Entered: 04/26/2006)
04/26/2006
25 NOTICE of Appearance by WALTER H. SWAYZE, III on behalf of AVALON POLICE EPT. with JURY DEMAND & CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE (SWAYZE, WALTER) (Entered: 04/26/2006)
06/01/2006
26 MOTION FOR A MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROBLEMS OF PRCEDING THIS ACTION WITHOUT OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE..(gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on
11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 06/02/2006)
06/02/2006
27 RESPONSE in Opposition re 26 MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE COURT filed by MANHEIM TOWNSHIP
POLICE DEPT.. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) (Entered: 06/02/2006)
06/05/2006
28 RESPONSE to Motion re 26 MOTION for Ex Parte Meeting filed by FULTON BANK, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text
of Proposed Order)(CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) Modified on 6/7/2006 (np). (Entered: 06/05/2006)
06/13/2006
29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF MELLON BANK, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DET
AND FULTON BANK ARE GRANTED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT
THE PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS ALSO DISMISSED AS TO DEFTS SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, STONE
HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, AVALON POLICE DEPT, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND LANCASTER COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF TODAY'S DATE. FURTHER ORDERED
THAT THE PLFF'S MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE COURT IS DENIED AS MOOT.. SIGNED BY JUDGE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/13/06.6/14/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (lvj, ) (Entered: 06/14/2006)
7/9/2015 7:41 PM
4 of 6
06/14/2006
30 REPLY to Fulton Bank's response to plff's motion for ex parte meeting with Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin, filed by plff STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, Certificate of Service. (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 06/15/2006)
06/19/2006
31 ORDER THAT TO THE THE EXTENT THAT PLAINTIFF REQUESTS LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN HIS
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING WITH THE COURT, THE REQUEST TO AMEND
THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SAID MOTION IS
GRANTED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/19/06. 6/19/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND
E-MAILED.(le, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006)
06/30/2006
32 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON.Certificate of Service.(HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered:
06/30/2006)
06/30/2006
33 Memorandum in Support re 32 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. (HALLINGER, ROBERT)
(Entered: 06/30/2006)
06/30/2006
34 AFFIDAVIT of Vincent Guarini by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. (HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered: 06/30/2006)
06/30/2006
35 AFFIDAVIT of Howard Kelin by LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON. (HALLINGER, ROBERT) (Entered: 06/30/2006)
06/30/2006
36 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY JUDGE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN. 7/3/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, AND E-MAILED.(sc, ) (Entered: 07/03/2006)
07/19/2006
37 MOTION for Clarification and Establish Deadline to File Amended Complaint filed by FULTON BANK.Certificate of Service.
(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) (Entered: 07/19/2006)
07/19/2006
38 RESPONSE in Support re 37 MOTION for Clarification and Establish Deadline to File Amended Complaint filed by FULTON BANK.
(CARFLEY, STEPHANIE) (Entered: 07/19/2006)
07/20/2006
39 ORDER THAT DEFT FULTON BANK'S MOTION TO ESTABLISH A DEADLINE IS GRANTED, AS FOLLOWS: THE PLFF MUST
FILE ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 8/20/06. IF THE PLFF DOES NOT DO SO, THIS CASE WILL BE
DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/20/06. ) 7/20/06 ENTERED AND
COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (gn, ) (Entered: 07/20/2006)
07/20/2006
Set/Reset Deadlines: AMENDED PLEADINGS DUE BY 8/20/2006. (gn, ) (Entered: 07/20/2006)
08/18/2006
40 RESPONSE to Fulton Bank's motion to establish deadline for plff to file amended complaint in accordance with the Court's order of
6/19/06, filed by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Certificate of Service. (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ).
(Entered: 08/21/2006)
08/24/2006
41 ORDER THAT THE PLFF'S REQUEST IS GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: THE PLFF MAY FILE
ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 9/6/06. IF THE PLFF DOES NOT DO SO, THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED,
WITH PREJUDICE. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/23/06. ) 8/24/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED
AND E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006)
08/30/2006
42 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 41 Order, by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Filing fee $ 0.. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (jl, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 08/31/2006)
08/30/2006
43 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 42 Notice of Appeal: (jl, ) (Entered: 08/31/2006)
08/31/2006
Certified and Transmitted Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals. (Pleading #19 not included). (mac, ) (Entered: 08/31/2006)
09/06/2006
NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 42 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE,. USCA Case
Number 06-3955. (mjo, ) (Entered: 09/06/2006)
09/11/2006
44 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE..(gn, ) Additional attachment(s)
added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 09/12/2006)
09/14/2006
45 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S 44 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE
PETITIONER MAY PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FOR THE PURPOSES OF APPEAL.. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 9/13/06.9/15/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (lvj, ) (Entered: 09/15/2006)
09/20/2006
46 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to from the order of 8/25/06 by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk,
Certificate of Service. (gn, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ). (Entered: 09/20/2006)
09/20/2006
47 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 46 Notice of Appeal: (gn, ) (Entered: 09/20/2006)
11/15/2006
48 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gs) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2007 (gn, ).
(Entered: 11/16/2006)
11/17/2006
49 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR CONTINUANCE (DOC. NO. 'S 48, 49), IT IS
ORDERED THAT THE SAID MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CASE IS CURRENTLY ON APPEAL BEFORE THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
11/17/06. 11/20/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gs) (Entered: 11/20/2006)
04/13/2007
50 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (gn, ) (Entered: 04/13/2007)
04/16/2007
51 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CASE IS CURRENTLY ON APPEAL
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
04/26/2007
52 ORDER THAT THE PLFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS DENIED. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
7/9/2015 7:41 PM
5 of 6
05/07/2007
53 ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (06-4154 Paper #11) (gn, ) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
07/06/2007
54 ORDER of USCA dated 7/3/07 that the foregoing appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (gn, ) (Entered: 07/06/2007)
07/06/2007
07/13/2007
07/13/2007
Appeal Record Returned: 54 USCA Order (gn, ) (Entered: 07/06/2007)

55 ORDER THAT THE PLFF MUST FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 8/15/07. IF THE PLFF DOES NOT DO SO,
THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/13/07. ) 7/13/07
ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 07/13/2007)
AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE BY 8/15/2007. (gn, ) (Entered: 07/13/2007)
07/25/2007
56 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE, BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(gn, )
(Entered: 07/25/2007)
07/25/2007
57 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (UNDERHILL, CHRISTOPHER) Modified on 7/26/2007
(afm, ). (Entered: 07/25/2007)
07/25/2007
58 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED. THE PLFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL 10/15/07, TO AMEND HIS
COMPLAINT. IF THE PLFF DOES NOT DO SO, THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL
NOT GRANT THE PLFF ANY MORE TIME EXTENSIONS FOR THE FILING OF HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT. ( SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/25/07. ) 7/26/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered:
07/26/2007)
07/25/2007
Set/Reset Deadlines: AMENDED PLEADINGS DUE BY 10/15/2007. (gn, ) (Entered: 07/26/2007)
08/01/2007
59 Response to Manheim Township Police Dept. objection to motion for continuance, filed by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Certificate
of Service. (gn, ) (Entered: 08/01/2007)
08/10/2007
60 EXHIBIT by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (gn, ) (Entered: 08/10/2007)
10/15/2007
61 AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 MOTION-PART TWO)(mac, ) (Entered: 10/16/2007)
10/23/2007
62 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE (DOC. NO. 61), IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/22/07. 10/23/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gs) (Entered: 10/23/2007)
11/23/2007
63 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 62 Order Dismissing Case, by plff STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals
Clerk and Certificate of Service. (gn, ) (Entered: 11/27/2007)
11/23/2007
64 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 63 Notice of Appeal : (gn, ) (Entered: 11/27/2007)
12/03/2007
NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 63 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. USCA Case
Number 07-4474 (gn, ) (Entered: 12/03/2007)
12/07/2007
65 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FILED BY PLFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gn, ) (Entered:
12/10/2007)
12/12/2007
66 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 12/11/07. ) 12/12/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 12/12/2007)
08/19/2008
(Pleading #1 forwarded to USCA). (om, ) (Entered: 08/19/2008)
09/15/2008
(Pleading #1 received and forwarded to Records Department). (om, ) (Entered: 09/15/2008)
10/20/2008
67 MOTION FOR WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(gn, )
(Entered: 10/20/2008)
10/22/2008
68 ORDER of USCA dated 10/22/08 that the judgments of the District Court entered on 10/23/07, are hereby vacated and the cases are
remanded for further proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. (gn, ) (Entered: 10/23/2008)
10/30/2008
69 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE (DOC #67) IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT IT
REQUESTS DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
10/30/08. ) 10/31/08 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gn, ) (Entered: 10/31/2008)
07/29/2011
70 ORDER of USCA dated 9/30/08 as to 63 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE, 42 Notice of Appeal filed by
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, 46 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE that the judgments of the District Court enered
on 10/23/07, are hereby vacated and the cases are remanded for further proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. (gn, ) (Entered:
07/29/2011)
08/08/2011
71 NOTICE of Appearance by GEORGE C. WERNER on behalf of FULTON BANK with Certificate of Service(WERNER, GEORGE)
(Entered: 08/08/2011)

Transaction Receipt
07/09/2015 19:34:14
7/9/2015 7:41 PM
6 of 6
PACER
Login:
Description:
Docket Report
Search
Criteria:
2:05-cv02288-MAM
Billable
Pages:
Cost:
0.60
7/9/2015 7:41 PM
Case 2:05-cv-02288-MAM Document 61 Filed 10/15/07 Page 1 of 32
1 of 3
CLOSED,SPECIAL

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv-04650-MAM
CATERBONE v. WENGER et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
Case in other court: THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, 07-04475
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff
STANLY J. CATERBONE
represented by STANLY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
PRO SE
Plaintiff
V.
Defendant
MR. RANDALL O. WENGER
OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY PROTHONETARY
Defendant
MATTHEW MR. BOMBERGER
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF LANCASTER
COUNTY
Defendant
JUDGE MICHEAL GEORGELIS
LANCASTER COUNTY
Defendant
LEO J. ECKERT, JR.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Defendant
KELLY S. BALLENTINE, ESQ.
Defendant
MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR.
Defendant
DENISE COMMINS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant
RICHARD H. SIMMS
Defendant
STEVEN MYLIN
Defendant
WILLIAM G. REUTER
Defendant
MICHAEL SMITH
DAULPHIN COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Defendant
7/9/2015 7:29 PM
2 of 3
OFFICER RONALD BEZZARD

OF THE EAST LAMPETER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant
OFFICER THOMAS GJURICH
OF THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
Defendant
OFFICER ADAM CRAMER
OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPT
Defendant
CHIEF JOHN FIORILL
OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant
OFFICER ROBERT BUSER
Defendant
ROBERT M. FEDOR
Defendant
SHERRIF ROBERT BOURNE
LANCASTER COUNTY, OF THE LANCASTER SHERIFFS
DEPARTMENT
Defendant
JOLYNN STEINMAN
POSTMASTER, CONESTOGA POST OFFICE
Defendant
NELSON BREWSTER
INVESTIGATOR, OF THE PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICE
Defendant
OFFICER MICAHEL K. SCHAEFER
OF MILLERSVILLE BORO POLICE
Defendant
LUIS FURINA
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT JUDGE
Defendant
JUDGE MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT
Defendant
DONALD TOTARO
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Defendant
MICAHEL DETECTIVE LANDIS
LANCASTER COUNTY
Date Filed
Docket Text
10/18/2006
1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.AFFIDAVIT.(ks, ) Additional attachment(s)
added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered: 10/19/2006)
11/15/2006
2 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY STANLY J. CATERBONE.(gs) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ).
(Entered: 11/16/2006)
11/17/2006
3 ORDER THAT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT
PLAINTIFF SHALL AMEND HIS COMPLAINT SO AS TO PROVIDE A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.
12(e). SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 11/16/2006. 11/17/2006 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (mbh, )
Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered: 11/17/2006)
11/17/2006
4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS ACTION
CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. SIGNED BY JUDGE
7/9/2015 7:29 PM
3 of 3
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 11/17/06. 11/20/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 11/20/2006)
11/17/2006
5 Complaint against DEFENDANTS MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR, DENISE COMMINS, RICHARD H. SIMMS, STEVEN MYLIN,
WILLIAM G. REUTER, MICHAEL SMITH, RONALD BEZZARD, THOMAS GJURICH, ADAM CRAMER, JOHN FIORILL,
ROBERT BUSER, ROBERT M. FEDOR, ROBERT BOURNE, JOLYNN STEINMAN, NELSON BREWSTER, MICAHEL K.
SCHAEFER, LUIS FURINA, MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, DONALD TOTARO, MICAHEL DETECTIVE LANDIS, RANDALL O.
WENGER, MATTHEW MR. BOMBERGER, MICHEAL GEORGELIS, LEO J. ECKERT, JR and KELLY S. BALLENTINE, ESQ
filed by PLAINTIFFS ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP and STANLY J. CATERBONE.(mbh, ) Additional attachment(s) added on
10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered: 01/18/2007)
01/19/2007
6 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPENSE UNTIL 4/19/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/19/07. 1/19/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 01/19/2007)
04/03/2007
7 ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT filed by STANLY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service. (PRO SE) (pr, ) Additional attachment(s) added
on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered: 04/03/2007)
04/13/2007
8 STANLY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (#50 in 06-cv-4154).(fdc) (Entered: 04/13/2007)
04/16/2007
9 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPSENSE
UNTIL 6/19/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/16/07.4/16/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO
CATERBONE.(fdc) (Entered: 04/16/2007)
04/26/2007
10 ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/25/07. 4/26/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 04/26/2007)
05/07/2007
11 Addendum to Complaint by STANLY J. CATERBONE (#11 in 06-cv-4154). (fdc) (Entered: 05/07/2007)
06/19/2007
12 STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (#12 in 06-4154).(fdc) Additional
attachment(s) added on 6/19/2007 (ac, ). (Entered: 06/19/2007)
06/20/2007
13 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPENSE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL INFORM THE COURT ON OR BEFORE 8/31/07 AS TO THE STATUS
OF THE CASE. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/19/07.6/20/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc)
(Entered: 06/20/2007)
08/10/2007
14 EXHIBITS by plff STANLY J. CATERBONE. (gn, ) (Entered: 08/10/2007)
09/04/2007
15 Status of Case by STANLY J. CATERBONE. (stb, ) (Entered: 09/04/2007)
09/12/2007
16 ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST DATED 8/30/07 TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON 11/15/07, IS DENIED.
THE PLAINTIFF MUST SERVE THIS COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 10/15/07, OR THE CASE WILL BE DISMISSED. SIGNED
BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 9/11/07. 9/12/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 09/12/2007)
10/15/2007
17 STANLY J. CATERBONE'S Amendment to Complaint and Motion for Continuance, Certificate of Service.(fdc) (Entered: 10/15/2007)
10/23/2007
18 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/22/07.10/23/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO CATERBONE.(fdc) (Entered: 10/23/2007)
11/23/2007
19 NOTICE OF APPEAL by STANLY J. CATERBONE, Certificate of Service. (Filing Fee: IFP Status) Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA,
Appeals Clerk. (kw, ) (Entered: 11/26/2007)
11/23/2007
20 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 19 Notice of Appeal. (kw, ) (Entered: 11/26/2007)
12/10/2007
NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 19 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLY J. CATERBONE. USCA Case Number
07-4475 (jpd) (Entered: 12/10/2007)
10/20/2008
21 STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(fdc) (Entered:
10/20/2008)
10/30/2008
22 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT IT REQUESTS DISMISSAL OF THE
CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/30/08.10/30/08 ENTERED AND
COPIES MAILED TO CATERBONE.(fdc) (Entered: 10/30/2008)
07/29/2011
23 ORDER of USCA as to 19 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLY J. CATERBONE. Re: Ordered and Adjudged by this Court that the
judgments of the District Court entered on 10/23/07, be and the same are hereby vacated and the cases are remanded for further
proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court. (fdc) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

Transaction Receipt
07/09/2015 19:26:33
PACER
Login:
Description:
Docket Report
Search
Criteria:
2:06-cv04650-MAM
Billable
Pages:
Cost:
0.30
7/9/2015 7:29 PM
www.amgglobalentertainmentgrouQ.com
Case 2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document 5 Filed 11/17/06
Page 1 of 4
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
717.731.8184 Pho
717.427-1621 a~
,~
Ii
. ,I
06 -4H50
Stanley J.i'i=aterbort"e'
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STANLYJ. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
PLAINTIFF
v.
MR. RANDALL O. WENGER OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY PROTHONETARY
MR. MATHEW BOMBERGER, OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
OF LANCASTER COUNTY
LANCASTER COUNTY JUDGE MICHAEL GEORGELIS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE LEO ECKERT, JR.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KELLY S. BALLENTINE, ESQ
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENISE COMMINS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE RICHARD H. SIMMS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE STEVEN MYLIN
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE WILLIAM G. REUTER
DAUPHIN COUNTY DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MICHAEL SMITH
OFFICER RONALD BEZZARD OF THE EAST LAMPETER POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER THOMAS GJURICH OF THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
OFFICER ADAM CRAMER OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPT
CHIEF JOHN FIORILL OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER ROBERT BUSER OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER ROBERT M. FEDOR OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT '
LANCASTER COUNTY SHERRIF ROBERT BOURNE OF THE LANCASTER
COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPARTMENT
JOLYNN STEINMAN, POSTMASTER, CONESTOGA POST OFFICE
NELSON BREWSTER, INVESTIGATOR, OF THE PA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
OFFICER MICAHEL K. SCHAEFER OF MILLERSVILLE BORO POLICE
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT JUDGE LUIS FURINA
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT JUDGE MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONALD TOTARO
LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVE MICAHEL LANDIS
CIVIL ACTION
CASE NO.
F:/(12
i';OV.. 17,
L
M~C
00
By
o'Z. Clerk
ep. C/ef/r
JURY TRIAL
DEFENDANTS
CIVIL ACTION CITING RICO CIVIL STATUTES

AND FEDERAL CIVIL RIGH
VIOLATIONS
Date: October 16, 2006
Page 1 of 16
10/16/2006

COMPLAINT
RICO Offenses And Definitions
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO) is a
United States federal law, which provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of
an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control
Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (Oct. 15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title
18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. 1961 through 18 U.S.c. 1968. It has been speculated that
the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the movie Little Caesar, which featured a
notorious gangster named "Rico." The original drafter of the bill, G. Robert Blakey, has refused to
confirm or deny this.
RICO addresses long-term, not one-shot, criminal activity. Not only must a RICO claim be
based upon criminal activity, but the criminal acts must constitute a "pattern" of criminal actlvttv. A
single criminal act, short-term criminal conduct, or criminal actions that bear no relationship to each
other will not give rise to a RICO claim. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that criminal
actions constitute a "pattern" only if they are related and continuous. In order to be "related," the
criminal acts must Involve the same victims, have the same methods of commission, involve the same
participants, or be related in some other fashion. A pattern may be sufficiently continuous if the
criminal actions occurred over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of indefinite duration.
The former patterns are referred to as closed-ended patterns; the latter patterns are referred to as
open-ended patterns. Accordingly, even if you have been injured by a criminal act, you will not have a
RICO claim unless that criminal act is part of a larger pattern of criminal activity.
Statutes of Limitations:
Congress failed to include a statute of limitations when it passed the RICO Act, but the United
States Supreme Court has remedied that oversight and imposed a four-year statute of limitations on
all civil RICO claims. Civil Rico's statute of limitations begins to run when the victim discovers or
reasonably should have discovered its injury. Many people also believe that the statute of limitations is
reset every time a new criminal act is committed - this is not true. Once a victim is aware or should be
aware of its injury, the victim has four years to discover the remaining elements of its claim and bring
suit. A victim cannot sit on its rights and refrain from filing suit in the face of known injuries. That
being said, however, there is several equitable doctrines that may toll or suspend the running of the
statute of limitations. If a defendant fraudulently conceals facts that are essential to the victim's ability
to purse its rights, the running of the statute of limitations may be tolled. In addition, acts of duress,
such as "if you sue me, I'll kill you," may toll the running of the statute of limitations. All tolling
doctrines are based upon whether it is fair, under the circumstances, to bar the victim's claims on the
basis of the running of the statute of limitations. Also, if a defendant engages in a new pattern of
Page 2 of 16
1011612006
Case
2:06-cv-04650-MAM
Document
Filed 11/17/06
Page
3 of to
4 those new
racketing, that causes
new
and independent injuries,
a new5limitations
period may
apply
and independent injuries.
Racketeering activity means:

Any act or threat involving gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion,
dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in
section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and
punishable by imprisonment for more than one year;
Any act which is indictable under a wide variety of specific provisions of title 18 of the United
States Code relating to bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, obscene matter,
obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of
murder-for-hire, etc. Any act which is indictable under title 29, United States Code, section 186
(dealing with restrictions on payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501 (c)
(relating to embezzlement from union funds),
Any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section
157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation,
receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed
chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any
law of the United States, Any act which is indictable under the Currency and Foreign
Transactions Reporting Act,
Any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to
bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain
aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating to importation of alien for immoral
purpose) if the act indictable under such section of such Act was committed for the purpose of
financial gain, or
Any act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b (g)(5)(B); Pattern of
racketeering actlvltv requires at least two acts of racketeering actiVity, one of which occurred
after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years
(excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering
actiVity;
The RICO laws can be alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought
against individuals or corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law
enforcement, or against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a
defendant.
Antl-SLAPP (strategic lawsult against public participation) laws can be applied In an attempt to
curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as a
weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could be
alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to concoct
Page 3 of 16
10/1612006
Case 2:06-cv-04650-MAM
5 Filed
11/17/06 Page
4 ofbeen
4 brought
flctttlous legal complaints
solely in retribution Document
and retaliation
for themselves
having
before the courts.
Causes of Action:
1.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in activities that resulted in the extortion and theft of the
PLAINTIFFS assets and Businesses, business property, stock, and income opportunities.
2.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in Prosecutorial Misconduct resulting in false imprisonment.
3.
DEFEI\lDITS did willfully engage in Defamation of Character and libel.
4.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in Providing False Statements to Authorities.
5.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in Criminal Activities with the intent to Obstruct Justice And
deny PLAINTIFF's Rights to Due Process of Bankruptcy Petition 05-23089; Lancaster Court of
Common Pleas Civil Actions CI-05-03644; CI-06-07376; CI-06-03403; CI-06-03401; CI-06
03349; CI-06-07330; CI-06-04939; CI-06-02271; CI-06-07188; CI-06-06658; CI-06-08490;
and the Federal False Claims Act concerning International Signal & Control, PIc., and the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 05-2288; CA-05-3689; CA-06
4154; and CA-06-3395.
6.
DEFENDITS did willfUlly engage in Malicious Prosecution.
7.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in Acts of Mental Duress.
8.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in Wholesale Discrimination.
9.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in Officers have a duty to protect individuals from constitutional
violations by fellow officers. Therefore, an officer who witnesses a fellow officer violating an
individual's constitutional rights may be liable to the victim for failing to intervene.
DEFENDITS did willfully engage in using excessive force during certain arrests and
10.
Apprehensions.
The PLAINTIFF requests the Courts to issue an injunction against future acts as described
herein. The PLAINTIFF is under adverse duress to file this COMPLAINT; and will provide the follOWing
(e) a short and plain statement of the claim showinq that the pleader is entitled to relief; (f) a demand
for judgment for the relief to which the plaintiff deems himself entitled; as soon as the PLAINTIFF is
able.
The PLAINTIFF seeks a Trial By Jury and damages in excess of $150,000.00.
Date: October 16, 2006
s'c
Stanle J. Caterbo
220 tone Hill Roa
Conestoga, PA 174516
717-431-8184
717-427-1821 facsimile
amgroupOl@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Page 4 of 16
10/1612006

Stan J Caterbone OPEN Federal Cases in US DISTRICT COURT Eastern PA July 10, 2015

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Stan J Caterbone OPEN Federal Cases in US DISTRICT COURT Eastern PA July 10, 2015

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1250 Fremont Street

Fax Contact List

Fax Contact List

Fax Contact List

From: Stan Caterbone

Number of Pages: 66 Plus Cover

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Monday, July 06, 2015

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Monday, July 06, 2015

Monday, July 06, 2015

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Monday, July 06, 2015

Hon. P. Michael Sturla

Hon. Scott W. Boyd

Hon. Matthew E. Baker

Hon. Scott W. Boyd

Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Hon. Katie True

Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

Hon. Katie True

Hon. Ron Marsico

Monday, July 06, 2015

Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Monday, July 06, 2015

Richmond council passes resolution

May 20, 2015

Monday, July 06, 2015

dumb ideas, Bates said.

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Monday, July 06, 2015

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

United States District Court

Date Filed: 05/02/2014

represented by JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

# clear Docket Text

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number

CJA 20 APPIONTMENT OF ATTORNEY JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM for LISA

ORDER THAT JEREMY IBRAHIM, ESQ., IS APPOINTED AS PETITIONER'S

BRIEF ON BEHALF OF AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CANTERBONE AND

PACER Service Center

am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 5 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 6 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 7 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 8 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 9 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 10 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 11 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 12 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 13 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 14 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 15 of 52

Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document 4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 16 of 52