Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A-1
APPENDIX A
UV amount
IR amount
B. SOCIETY NEEDS
Cost, budget
Productivity
Reduction of complaints
More individual control
Maintenance
Lamp type
Security
Feeling of safety
Lighting Management
C. ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS
Use of daylight
Efficiency for peak load
Lighting control
Mercury / Harmonics
Lamp extinction
A-2
APPENDIX A
Energy Consumption
Level 2: 11 W/ m2
Current value & target value for different offices
(Normal office : 11W/ m2 and 9 W/ m2)
When the amount of used electricity is being
evaluated, per user should be used as the unit.
e.g. 45 kW / user.
A-3
APPENDIX A
WELL-BEING
NON VISUAL
EFFECTS
> 0.6
range of quality class of discomfort glare D2,
D3
D1, D2
luminance limitation of V glare classification
luminaire V2 < 200 cd/m2
V3 < 2000cd/m2
G2, V2 ( block horizontal line of sight to the
lamp) limit glare
80 < CRI < 90
CCT > 3300 K
blinds
Spectral distribution
Daylight factor
Daily doses
Frequency
UV amount
IR amount
B. SOCIETY NEEDS
Cost, budget
Productivity, Reduction of complaints
More individual control
Maintenance
Security
Feeling of safety
A-4
REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX A
C. ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS
Efficiency for peak load
Luminous efficacy
Mercury / Harmonics
Reduction of resources
Lamp extinction
Electrical Power density
Energy Consumption
A-5
APPENDIX A
VISUAL COMFORT
Ceiling luminance
Maximum luminances from luminaries
overhead
Wall luminnances
Maximum luminance from window
Surface reflectance
Flicker-free
COLOUR
APPEARANCE
WELL-BEING
NON VISUAL
EFFECTS
Uniformity task
Uniformity surroundings
Discomfort glare
Reflected glare
Veiling reflections
Colour rendering of light CRI
Colour temperature of light CCT
Use of saturated colours
Colour variations
Contact to the outside
Daylight factor
Daylight consideration
Light modelling
Directional lighting
Biophilia hypothesis
Aesthetics of space
Aesthetics of lighting equipment
REQUIREMENTS
> 500 lx
> 750 lx
> 500 lx
Ambient lighting > 300 lx
200 lx
< 200 lx
1:3 near work place
1:10 for other surfaces
there are minimum shielding angles according to
the light level
Luminances of room surfaces, 40:1.
Angles from luminaries and high value
Less than 10:3:1
walls: 0.3-0.8
ceiling: 0.6-0.9
floor: 0.1-0.5
working planes: 0.2-0.6
avoid flicker & stroboscopic effects by lighting
system
> 0.7
> 0.5
UGR 19
must be prevented or reduced
> 80
3000 K < CCT < 5000 K
Spectral distribution
Daily doses
Frequency
UV amount / IR amount
B. SOCIETY NEEDS
Cost, budget
Productivity / Reduction of complaints
Maintenance
Security
Feeling of safety
Lighting management
A-6
APPENDIX A
C. ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS
Lighting control
Efficiency for peak load
Luminous efficacy
Mercury / Harmonics
Reduction of resources / Lamp
extinction
Electrical power density
Energy Consumption
A-7
APPENDIX A
Surface reflectance
Flicker-free
COLOUR
APPEARANCE
Uniformity task
Uniformity surroundings
Discomfort glare
Reflected glare / Veiling reflections
Colour rendering of light CRI
Colour temperature of light CCT
Use of saturated colours
Colour variations
Daylight factor
Contact to the outside
Light modelling
WELL-BEING
NON VISUAL
EFFECTS
REQUIREMENTS
500 lx
300 lx
750 lx
200 lx
ceiling: 0.6-0.9
walls: 0.3-0.8
working planes: 0.3-0.6
floor: 0.1-0.5
use DC electrical supply or operating lamps at
high frequency (30 kHz)
0.7
0.5
UGR < 19
must be prevented or reduced
>80
Directional lighting
Biophilia hypothesis
Aesthetics of space
Aesthetics of lighting equipment
Spectral distribution
Daily doses
Frequency
UV amount
IR amount
B. SOCIETY NEEDS
Cost, budget
Productivity, Reduction of complaints
More individual control
Maintenance factor
Security
Feeling of safety
Lighting Management
C. ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS
A-8
< 0.7
APPENDIX A
A-9
APPENDIX A
REQUIREMENTS
A. INDIVIDUAL NEEDS
Illuminance (horizontal) task area
Drawing
VISUAL PERFORMANCE
Illuminance (horizontal), computer
Conference room
Reception, lounge, lobbies
Archives
Corridors
Illuminance (vertical) on screens
Maximum luminances from
luminaries overhead
Wall luminances
Luminaire distribution
Maximum luminance from window
Optimum size range for task detail
Surface reflectance
VISUAL COMFORT
Flicker-free
Uniformity task
WELL-BEING
Psychological effects
A-10
ceiling: 0.7-0.8
walls :0.4-0.5
working planes : 0.25-0.4
furniture : 0.25-0.4
floor : 0.25-0.4
In rooms where a stroboscopic effect can
occur, adjacent lamps must be connected to
three phases of the supply voltage or
supplied with electronic ballasts.
Uniformity ratio (maximum illuminance to
minimum)
Fluorescent lamp 1,3
Other light sources 1,5
Over task area 1,5 or 2
APPENDIX A
Light modeling
Daylight consideration
Daylight factor
Spectral distribution
Daily doses
Frequency
UV amount
IR amount
B. SOCIETY NEEDS
Cost, Budget
Productivity
Reduction of complaints
More individual control
Maintenance
Lamp type
Security
emergency lighting
Feeling of safety
Lighting Management
C. ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS
Use of daylight
Efficiency for peak load
A-11
APPENDIX A
Lighting control
Luminous efficacy
Mercury / Harmonics
Reduction of resources
Lamp extinction
Electrical power density
Energy consumption
A-12
APPENDIX A
REQUIREMENTS
A. INDIVIDUAL NEEDS
VISUAL PERFORMANCE
320 lx
600 lx
320 lx
240 lx
160 lx
Not less than the maintained illuminance
recommended for the task.
Not less than 240 lx for combined system
(local&general lighting) or task illuminances>600 lx
40 lx
Good, simple: 240 lx
Average detail: 320 lx
Poor, fine detail: 600 lx
2:1 between task and background
<3:1
Wall luminances
VISUAL COMFORT
Luminaire distribution
Maximum luminance from
window
Surface reflectance
Flicker-free
Uniformity task
contrast rendering factor
Discomfort glare
Reflected glare
Veiling reflections
COLOUR APPEARANCE
A-13
APPENDIX A
Light modeling
Daylight consideration
Daylight factor
Directional lighting
Biophilia hypothesis
Lighting design
Aesthetics of space
Aesthetics of lighting
equipment
Warm <3300 K
Intermediate 3300 K 5300 K
For decorative effect
Uniform color appearance
Compatible with the light sources
People prefer to work with daylight
Rearranging of the workstations in order to reduce
discomfort glare.
Spectral distribution
Daily doses
Frequency
UV amount
IR amount
B. SOCIETY NEEDS
Budget, cost
Productivity
Reduction of complaints
More individual control
Maintenance
Emergency lighting
A-14
Lamp type
Security
APPENDIX A
Emergency lighting
Feeling of safety
Lighting management
C. ENVIRONMENTAL
Use of daylight
Lighting control
Luminous efficacy
Mercury
Reduction of resources
Harmonics
Lamp extinction
Electrical power density
Energy Consumption
A-15
APPENDIX A
Nepal - J.B. Gupta, Electrical installation estimation and costing, New Delhi, 1995, 7th edition
NEEDS &
EXPECTATIONS
(Human, societal,
environmental)
REQUIREMENTS
PARAMETERS
A. INDIVIDUAL NEEDS
VISUAL PERFORMANCE
VISUAL COMFORT
Illuminance (horizontal)
task area
Drawing
Illuminance (horizontal),
computer
Conference room
Reception, lounge, lobbies
Visual task near threshold
Illuminances of immediate
surroundings
Corridors
Archives
Illuminance (vert) on screens
Luminance ratio on task area
Luminance reflected in the
screen
(for elevation angles of 65 or
more)
Visual comfort probability
Ceiling luminance
Maximum luminances from
luminaries overhead
Wall luminnances
Luminaire distribution
A-16
100 lx
300 lx
< 3:1
APPENDIX A
USA - ANSI/IESNA RP-1-04, American National Standard Practice for Office Lighting
NEEDS &
EXPECTATIONS
PARAMETERS
REQUIREMENTS
(Human, societal,
environmental)
A. INDIVIDUAL NEEDS
VISUAL PERFORMANCE
Illuminance (horizontal)
task area
Drawing
Illuminance (horizontal),
computer
Conference room
Reception, lounge, lobbies
VISUAL COMFORT
50 lx
VCP > 70 %
Open plan office VCP > 80
Without VDT screen:
Lceiling (maximum) <10 x Ltask
With VDT screen:
Lceiling (maximum) < 850 cd/m2
Respect angles and intensity limits to prevent from
glare
55: 300 cd, 65: 220 cd, 75: 135 cd, 85: 45 cd
Ceiling luminance ratio:
maximum=8:1, Best= 2:1, good=4:1
A-17
APPENDIX B
Identification
Building coordinates
Building name
Address (street)
City
Country
Number
ZIP
State
Building type
Offices
Hospitals
Educational buildings
Manufacturing factory
Hotels, bars and restaurants
Wholesale and retail service
Sporting areas
Other
Contact person
Coordinates:
Name
Address (street)
City
Country
Telephone
E-mail
Number
ZIP
State
Fax
Function :
Building energy manager
Building designer (architect, engineering team)
Building user
Maintenance team
Other
B-1
APPENDIX B
Save energy
Perform maintenance on luminaires
Adapt the lighting conditions to the task
Be informed on the status of the luminaires
Improve the image of the building
Improve the productivity of employees
Improve the well-being of the building users
Install (expensive) useless systems
Render the building and its environment dynamic
Other (please specify)
.
.
Lighting control has to be designed by :
(scale 1 to 5, 1 not important, 5 very important)
The architect
The building manager
The building owner/user
The engineering team
The lighting manufacturer
Other (please describe)
.
.
Lighting control is expensive:
Yes
Yes, but with a justifiable payback time
No
No idea
It depends on the system
B-2
APPENDIX B
Absence
Presence
Clock control
Colour control
Daylight
Occupants demand
Other (please describe)
.
.
Lighting control is best a control
(scale 1 to 5, 1 not important, 5 very important)
B-3
APPENDIX B
B-4
APPENDIX B
The question on flexibility and modularity of the lighting system may be considered as
information about the future affectations of the building. For some buildings (i.e. rented
offices) light structure walls are displaced and spaces are reorganized regularly. A change of
the lighting control system than has to be possible and has to be as easy as possible.
The question on maintenance wants to identify whether the correspondent is aware of the
need of a regular maintenance scheme in order to assure a desired light level or considers
punctual interventions (e.g. changing of broken lamps) to be enough. In the latter case, he
should be informed on possible light comfort problems in the future.
B-5
APPENDIX C
Aizenberg: Integral approach to design building engineering systems design: Lighting, heating,
air- conditioning as an effective way to energy saving
Bisegna& Gori: Generic algorithms for lighting design optimization.
Chen & Wang &Li: A stand-alone solar lighting system for electrodeless fluorescent lamp
Dehoff: ELI and LENI Tools for the evaluation and presentation of human aspects and
energy efficiency in lighting
Halonen: Lighting Energy Usage and Lighting Efficiency in Industrialized and Developing
Countries IEA ECBCS Annex 45
Kaase: Optimized illumination improving energy efficiency and quality of light
Pohl: Energy efficient lighting solutions trends and chances
Tetri: Usability of LEDs for General Lighting
Tetri & Pohl: Concepts and techniques for energy efficient lighting solutions. Fifth
International Conference, Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings (IEECB08)
J. Aizenberg, Integral approach to design building engineering systems: (lighting, heating, airconditioning) - as an effective way to Energy Saving, Fifth International Conference,
Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings (IEECB08)
Fontoynont M., Long-term economical assessment of lighting systems, Light and engineering,
2007.
Tetri, E., Halonen L. Future trends of energy efficient lighting. Proceedings of the 26th
session of the CIE, Beijing, China, 4-11 July 2007. pp. 45-48.
Halonen L., Tetri E. Lighting - Energy Consumption and Energy Efficiency. Proceedings of
the 4th International conference Iluminat, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 31 May-1 June 2007.
Tetri E. Energiatehokkaat valaistusratkaisut (Energy efficient lighting solutions).
Projektiuutiset 5/2007, pp. 66-69.
Bhusal P., Tetri E., Halonen L. Quality and Efficiency of office lighting. Proceedings of the
C-1
APPENDIX C
4th European Conference on Energy Performance and Indoor Climate in Building and the
27th International Conference AIVC, Lyon, France, 20-22 November 2006, pp. 535-540.
Halonen L., Tetri E. 2006. IEA ECBCS Annex 45 - Energy efficient electric lighting for
buildings. Lighting of work places: proceedings. Fifteenth International Symposium Lighting
Engineering 2006, Bled, Slovenia. Lighting Engineering Society of Slovenia. pp. 5-10.
Truus Debruin. 2006. Dayligt and electric light in School buildings, Dutch Journal of
Building Physics.
Matorski Z. Influence of new lighting technologies into electrical networks and installations.
EURO-SINE Electrical networks and Installations in EU Legislation Acts. SEP Association
of Polish Electrical Engineers. Silesian University of Technology and Silesian Chamber of
Civil Engineers. Ustron, Poland. pp. 125-134.
Mantorski Z., Sitko A. 2006. Digital dta transmission using low voltage power line. Silesian
University of technology Scientfic Bulletin Elektryka, no 198, pp. 85-98.
Mantorski Z. Energy efficient ligting in buildings Annex 45. XIV National Lighting
Conference, Lighting techniques 2005. pp. 73-74.
Merzwinski S. Efficient energy consumption. Information on Silesian university of technology
participation in iea programmes. z zycia Politechniki slaskiej, March 2007 No 6(170), pp. 2629.
C-2