Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Economia de Transporte
32,3%
34,2%
United States
Japan
Germany
Other G7
Rest of the world
12,3%
15,1%
6,1%
Share of Global GDP Growth, 1995-2002
25
20
15
10
0
China US Other Asia EU Japan Rest of the
World
Not Available
Less than $2,000
$2,000 to $5,000
$5,000 to $12,000
$12,000 to $20,000
More than $20,000
Share of Asia in World Trade, 1980-2003
28
26 Exports
Imports
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
19
50 Value (Trillions of Current $US)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
19
53
1950
19 1952
56
1954
19
59 1956
1958
Value
Share
World GDP
19
62 1960
19 1962
65
1964
19 1966
68
1968
19 1974
74
1976
19
77 1978
1980
19
80 1982
19 1984
83
1986
19 1988
86
1990
19 1992
89
1994
19
92 1996
1998
19
Changes in the Value World’s Merchandise Trade, Production and GDP, 1950-2004 (in %)
95 2000
19 2002
98
2004
20
0
2
4
6
8
01
10
12
14
16
United Kingdom
Italy
Netherlands
France
Japan
China
United States
Germany
20,0%
United States
18,0% Japan
Germany
16,0% China
Saudi Arabia
14,0%
12,0%
10,0%
8,0%
6,0%
4,0%
2,0%
0,0%
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
04
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
Value of Chinese Exports and Received FDI, 1983-2004 (Billions of $US)
600 70
Exports
500 FDI 60
50
400
40
Exports
FDI
300
30
200
20
100 10
0 0
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
01
03
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
1995
Pacific
Atlantic
Other
1990
Periphery
Semi-Periphery
Core
Western Europe
North America
East Asia
Economies
Underdeveloped
Developing
Newly Industrializing
Advanced
Oil Export / Rent
“Platform” Corporation
Distribution
Platform
Manufacturers
800
Containerized Cargo
700 Other General Cargo
600
Million tons
500
400
300
200
100
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
International Trade and Transportation Chains
International Trade
A B
Origin Trade barrier Destination
Assembly Disassembly
Transport Chain
Intermodal Moderate to high No weight restrictions. 3 days for cross country. On- Average haul between 700
time performance between and 1,500 miles.
truck and rail.
Air High Small. Most loads less than Normally overnight or second More than 1,300 miles.
100 lbs. day.
Inland Water Moderate to low Bulk shipments. Varies according to segment. Between 250 and 1,600 miles.
Competitive with rail.
Coastal Water Moderate to low Containers, general freight Function of distance. Between Between 500 and 2,000 miles.
and bulk shipments. 2 to 5 days.
International High to low Mainly containers and bulk 7 to 10 days trans-Atlantic and More than 2,600 miles.
Water shipments. trans-Pacific routes.
Pipeline Low Bulk shipment of liquids and According to demand. 0 to 20 825 miles average distance for
gazes. mph. crude oil.
Economic Benefits of Efficient Transportation
24,3% 24,2%
Housing
Health Care
Food
Transportation-related
6,9% Education
14,6%
Recreation
Other
7,0%
10,8% 12,2%
Employment in Transportation Occupations, United States, 1985-2001
5.000
4.500
4.000 Public transportation
attendants
3.500 Air transportation
3.000
Thousands
Water transportation
2.500
2.000 Rail transportation
1.500
Motor vehicle operators
1.000
500
0
1985 1990 1995 2001
Transport
Improvements
Commodity
Labor Market
Market
Growth
Transportation and the Economy
Lower Transport
Shorter Transit Times Business Expansion
Costs
Increased Productivity
Increased Competitiveness
Economic Growth
Economic
Region A Region B
Production and
Specialization
Self Reliance
Regional Trade
Trade and
Transport
Trade and
International Transport
Trade
Product A
Product B
Product C
Product D
Product E
Gateway
A. Economia, Comércio e Transporte
B. Modos de Transporte
C. Custos de Transporte
D. Logística e Terminais
F. Rodovia e Intermodalidade
G. Ferrovia
H. Marítimo
I. Aéreo
J. Ambiente
L. Transporte Urbano
Slides adaptados de:
Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2006 Vitor Caldeirinha
Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY vitorcaldeirinha@netvisao.pt
4.000.000
3.500.000
3.000.000
Air
2.500.000 Water
2.000.000 Pilelines
1.500.000
Truck
Rail
1.000.000
500.000
0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
30
Market Share by Freight Transport Mode, Western Europe, 1980-2002 (in ton-km)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% Inland Waterways
50% Road
40% Rail
30%
20%
10%
0%
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2002
Market Share by Freight Transport Mode, United States, 1980-2000 (in ton-miles)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% Water
50% Truck
40% Rail
30%
20%
10%
0%
1980 1985 1990 1995 1999
Passengers
Quantity of Passengers or Freight
s
Freight
n-km
rto
o
Growth in g er
en
production and ss
Pa
consumption
Income growth
Industrial relocation
Economic specialization KM
Suburbanization
Average Distance
Share of Total Domestic Freight Activity by Mode, G7 Countries, 1996
100%
% of total domestic metric ton-km
80%
Road
60% Rail
Oil Pipeline
40% Water
Air
20%
0%
Canada France Germany Italy Japan United United
Kingdom States
100%
% of total domestic passenger-km
80%
60%
Rail
Road
40% Air
20%
0%
Canada France Germany Italy Japan United United
Kingdom States
Transportation Modes
70
Value
60
Weight
50
40
30
20
10
0
Truck Rail Pipeline Air Water Other and
unknown
Classic Transport Demand / Supply Function
Cost
Demand T 2 − T1 Supply
Elasticity =
C 2 − C1
D
S1
S2
Equilibrium
C1
C2
T1 T2 Traffic
10,000 Tons
350,000 Bushels 384.6
100 car train unit 3,024,000 Gallons
300,000 tons
2 million barrels of oil 9,330
VLCC
124 tons 5
747-400F
Passenger Transport by Mode, Japan, 1950-1999
1400
Airline
1200 Railway
Billions of Passenger Kilometers
Bus
1000
Auto
800
600
400
200
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 1999
12.000
10.000
8.000
1990
6.000
2000
4.000
2.000
0
Highways Rail Waterways Pipelines &
other
World Automobile Production and Fleet, 1965-2004
600
44
550 42
40
500
38
Production (millions)
450 36
Fleet (millions)
400 34
32
350 30
300 28
26
250
24
200 22
Fleet
20
150 Production 18
100 16
65
67
69
71
73
75
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
01
03
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
Supplier Customer
Transport Transport
Components of Transport Cost
Transaction Costs
Friction of Distance
A B
Shipment
1 2
Zone Change
Costs
Fixed Costs
Distance
3 4
Transshipment Costs
Distance
Punctuality Frequency
Freight Transportation Service Spectrum
High Low
Air Cargo Truck Rail Intermodal Rail Carload Rail Unit Water
$1.5 / lbs 5 - 10¢ / lbs 3¢ / lbs 1¢ / lbs 0.5 - 1¢ / lbs 0.5¢ / lbs
Fastest, most reliable Fast, reliable and visible. Slower, less reliable and
and most visible. Range of weight and less visible.
Lowest weight, highest value. Highest weight, lowest
value and most time- Rail intermodal value and lest time-
sensitive cargo. competitive with truck sensitive cargo.
over longer distances.
A B C
D E F
10 km 30 minutes
Evolution of Logistical Integration, 1960-2000
Demand Forecasting 1980s
Purchasing
Materials
Requirements Planning
Management
Production Planning
1990s
Manufacturing Inventory
2000s
Warehousing
Supply Chain
Materials Handling Logistics
Management
Packaging
Inventory
Distribution Planning
Physical Information Technology
Order Processing Distribution
Transportation Marketing
Commodity Chain
Market
Stage
Market
Transport Chain
High volumes Average volumes Low volumes
Low frequency High frequency High frequency
Product Life Cycle
Monopoly Competition
s
or
e tit
p
C om
Inno
vati
Sales
ng f
irm
Decline of
Idea Promotion First competitors Mass production production
Research and
Growth Maturity Decline
development
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
Supplying Bodies
industries Manufacture and
Body assembling
stamping of body
and painting
Steel and panels
other metals
Rubber Components
Manufacture of mechanical and electrical Final Consumer
Electronics components (wheels, tires, seats, breaking Assembly market
systems, windshields, exhausts, etc.)
Plastic
Extraction Manufacturing
Processing
Farm Grain Cereal
Facility Distribution and Retailing
Packaged Cereal
Pa
ling cka
nd g ing
Ha
Transportation
Scheduling
Production
Purchase
g rs
Demand
sin de
Ma
e s Or
Sto emen
nag
oc e
P r has
ck
rc
Pu
t
Wa
re ho
usi les
n Sa
g
Logistics and Integrated Transport Demand
Materials Management
Derived Demand
Induced Demand
Logistics
(Integrated Demand)
Physical Distribution
Production
Time
Changes in the Relative Importance of Logistical Functions in Distribution Systems
Demand Driven
Inventory
Transport System
Information System
Supply Driven
Warehousing Costs
Transport Costs
20 40
18 Logistics Costs (% GDP)
35
Inventory Costs (% GDP)
16
Cycle Time Requirements (days) 30
14
12 25
% of GDP
Days
10 20
8 15
6
10
4
2 5
0 0
1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
4%
6%
Transportation
39%
24% Warehousing
Inventory Carrying
Order Processing
Administration
27%
Logistics Costs and Economic Development
Ukraine
Belgium
Canada
Japan
Singapore United States
Economic Development
25
20
15
Days
10
0
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Third and Fourth Party Logistics Providers
3PL
4PL
Modes
Manufacturers
Consumers
Materials
3PL
Retailers
Distribution Centers
3PL
3PL
Management
Producers Distributors
Consumers
Suppliers
Recyclers Collectors
Forward Channel
Reverse Channel
Suppliers
Suppliers
LTL
Customers
Receiving
Sorting
After Cross-Docking
Shipping
TL
Cross-Docking
DC
TL
Customers
Logistics Networks
Network Structure
Point to Point Hub-and-spoke
Dispersed
Locations
Clustered
Logistics and E-commerce
DC
Traditional Logistics
E-Retailer DC
E-Logistics
Retailer
Customers Customers
City Logistics
DC Central City
al
in
rm
Te
an
rb
U
Gateways and Hubs
Gateway Hub
Corridor
Modal Gateways
Land Logistics
Manufacturing
Border
Air
Maritime
A. Economia, Comércio e Transporte
B. Modos de Transporte
C. Custos de Transporte
D. Logística e Terminais
F. Rodovia e Intermodalidade
G. Ferrovia
H. Marítimo
I. Aéreo
J. Ambiente
L. Transporte Urbano
Slides adaptados de:
Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2006 Vitor Caldeirinha
Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY vitorcaldeirinha@netvisao.pt
B B B B B
1
2 4 5
3
A A A A A
100
90
1 day driving
80
70
Non-motorized
60 Automobile
50 Air
40
30
30 minutes walking
20
10
0
0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Distance in km
Principles of Modal Shift
hare
tages M odal S
ve Advan Real
omparati nce
C
f orma
r per
Ove
Modal Share (A/B)
e
har
o dal S
ect ed M
Exp nce
r forma
rpe
U nde
Composition
Interchange
Connection
Piggyback (TOFC)
40’ (12.2 m)
9’ (2.7 m)
17’ (2.7 m)
85’ (25.9 m)
65’ (19.8 m)
World Container Traffic, 1980-2005
350
300
250
Million TEU
200
150
100
50
0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
14
Millions
12
10
8
Trailers
6 Containers
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Multimodal and Intermodal Transportation
Rail
Road
D D Transshipment
F F
E E
Locality
Region
Articulation points
Nation
Terminals Flows
Transshipment Modal Function Competition / Cooperation
Handling Intermodal Function Maritime / Land interface
Average Length of Haul, Domestic Freight in the United States, 1960-2003 (in miles)
2000
Air carrier
1800
Truck
1600 Rail
1400 Coastal
1200
Miles
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Average Length of Haul, Domestic Passenger Modes in the United States, 1960-2003 (in miles)
900
800
700
Air carrier,
600
Bus, intercity
500 Amtrak
Commuter rail
400
300
200
100
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Driving Forces of Containerization and Co-modal Transport
Containerization
Specialized
Unitization Cellular ships Land consumption
terminals
Transshipment
Standardization Gantry cranes Multi-rate structure
productivity
Management and
Mergers Modal integration Logistics
coordination
Intermodal Information
Control over cargo Deregulation
operators System
Multimodal Transportation
Containerized Cargo Flows along Major Trade Routes, 1995-2004 (in millions of TEUs)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
US Containerized Trade with Asia, 1996-2004 (in 1,000 TEUs)
18.000
Exports to Asia
16.000
Imports from Asia
14.000
12.000
10.000
8.000
6.000
4.000
2.000
0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
C1 C2
Road
Transport costs per unit
C3
Rail Maritime
D1 D2 Distance
Value Per Ton of U.S. Freight Shipments by Transportation Mode, 2002
Rail $198
Pipeline $241
Water $401
Truck $775
C(T)
Local / Regional Distribution Cost Decomposition C(dc)
National / International Distribution Cost
Connection C(cn)
Costs
C(I) Interchange
C(cn) Connection
Composition C(cp)
Origin Transshipment Destination
Time and Cost of Transport Activities Involving Moving a 40 Foot Container between the American East
Coast and Western Europe 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Cumulative Cost and Time of Moving a 40 Foot Container between the American East Coast and Western
Europe
3500
3000
2500
Cumulative cost (US$)
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Cumulative time (hours)
Container Transport Costs
13%
23%
Ships
Containers
25% Terminals
Inland Transport
Other
18%
21%
Container Transport Costs from Inland China to US West Coast ($US per TEU)
Maritime transport
2,200
2,000
1,800
1,600
Billions of passengers-km
1,400
1,200
1,000
Asia
0,800
America
0,600 Africa and Middle East
0,400 Europe
Total Passengers-km
0,200
0,000
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
World Rail Freight Traffic, 1997-2004
8.000
7.000
6.000
Billions of tons-km
5.000 Asia
America
4.000
Africa and Middle East
3.000 Europe
2.000
1.000
0
1997 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004
Types of Rail Corridors
Hinterland access Expand market area, reduce PIDN, Virginia Inland port
distribution costs & congestion
114
A. Economia, Comércio e Transporte
B. Modos de Transporte
C. Custos de Transporte
D. Logística e Terminais
F. Rodovia e Intermodalidade
G. Ferrovia
H. Marítimo
I. Aéreo
J. Ambiente
L. Transporte Urbano
Slides adaptados de:
Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2006 Vitor Caldeirinha
Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY vitorcaldeirinha@netvisao.pt
9,0
8,0 Seaborne Trade (billions of tons of goods loaded)
Exports of Goods (trillions of $US)
7,0
6,0
5,0
4,0
3,0
2,0
1,0
0,0
55
58
61
64
67
70
73
76
79
82
85
88
91
94
97
00
03
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
Rhine / Danube
Bosporus
Mississippi / Great Lakes / St. L awrence
Gibraltar
Suez
Hormuz East / Southeast Asia
Good Hope
Magellan
127
New York
Norfolk Pusan Tokyo
Charleston
Los Angeles Hong Kong Osaka
Hakata
Laem Chabang Kaohsiung
Colon
Columbo
Thamesport Hamburg
Rotterdam
Zeebrugge
Le Havre
Hamburg
Le Havre Rotterdam
Southampton
FosGeno a
Barcelona
New York
Oakland Norfolk 27 Days Tokyo
Los Angeles Charleston Ningbo Shanghai
Kaohsiung
Hong Kong 39 Days
Laem Chabang
Singapore
49 Days Port Kelang
16
14
12
10
0
1830 1855 1880 1905 1930 1955
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1995
Oil
1990
Iron Ore
1985 Coal
1980 Grain
1970 Containers and other
31%
18%
Atlantic 15%
16%
Mediterranean 13%
10%
60%
9%
Pacific
15%
8%
Indian
3%
1960
28%
16%
15%
25%
8%
40% 15%
8%
25%
6%
4%
1990
600.000 7
Number of ships
500.000 Total gross tonnage (1,000s) 6
Average Tonnage (in 1,000 tons)
Average tonnage
5
400.000
4
300.000
3
200.000
2
100.000 1
0 0
1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Vessel Size Groups (in dead weight tons)
Handy
Crude Oil Tankers
Handymax
Dry Bulk Carriers
Panamax
Capesize
Aframax
Suezmax
VLCC
ULCC
0 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 250.000 300.000 350.000 400.000 450.000 500.000
Merchant Fleet of the World, Tonnage Registered per Ship Size, 1985-2000
600.000
500.000
Over 100,000
400.000 50,000- 99,999
Gross Tons
20,000- 49,999
300.000 10,000- 19,999
4,000-9,999
200.000 500-3,999
100-499
100.000
0
1985 1990 1995 2000
Operating Costs of Panamax and Post-panamax Containerships (in USD)
$16
Millions
$14
Port charges
$12
Fuel
$10 Administration
$8 Stores and lubes
$6 Insurance
Repair and maintenance
$4
Manning
$2
$0
Panamax (4,000 TEU) Post-panamax (10,000
TEU)
Country 1
Pendulum Service
A D
B E
Cabotage
C F
Country 2
Maritime Shipping Characteristics
Crude oil Very large consignments, Long hauls, Few Very large to ultra
routes, Specialized terminals, Few ports large
Oil products Small shipments, Numerous consignees, Many Small to medium
ports
Tons Shipped by Maritime Transportation, 1981-2000 (in millions)
6000
Other
5000 Grain
Ore/coal/minerals
4000 Oil
3000
2000
1000
0
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
140
120
100 UK
Netherlands
80
Germany
60 France
Finland
40 Belgium
20
0
1970 1980 1990 1995 2000
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
Port calls per week 4,000 TEU 5,000 TEU Port calls per week
Global Fleet of Containers, 2000 (in TEUs)
20 Foot
40 Foot
1999 Other
2000
250 m 3,000
Panamax Class 11-12 m
36-40 ft
290 m 4,000
Width (meters) 60 50 43
Draft (meters) 21 17 14
Speed (knots) 25 25 25
The Largest Available Containership, 1980-2005 (in TEUs)
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
700
Europe - Far East (11,500 miles)
600
Trans Pacific (8,000 miles)
Costs per TEU ($US)
400
300
200
100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Capacity in TEU
Economies and Diseconomies of Scale in Container Shipping
ent
ipm
h
nss
Costs per TEU
Tra
n
rtatio
Tr anspo
Inland
Maritime Ship
ping
Capacity in TEU
Megacarrier
Level of functional integration
The Function of Transport Terminals
Location
Local
Regional
Global
Infrastructures
Accessibility
Transport Gateways
Foreland Hinterland
Gateway
Local
Regional
Global
The Hinterland of a Transport Terminal
Island
Competition Margin
Client
Terminal A
Main Hinterland
Discontinuous
Port A Continuous hinterland Port A hinterland Port A
'Island' formation
Discontinuous
hinterland Port B
Port B Continuous hinterland
Core of the service area
Port B Middle section of the service area
Outer section of the service area
Inland terminal
Types of Hinterland
Hinterland Foreland
B
A D
Main hinterland
Competition margin
C
Terminals as Clusters and Growth Poles
Cluster Performance
Value added
Te
en
ch
nm
no
ro
lo
vi
gy
En
4
2
Legislation
3
City 1 Port
3 2
4
Ec
on
om
s
ic
y
li t
Po
Zone of conflict/cooperation
1 Port migration Environmental filter
2 Industrial migration
Traditional port/city zone
3 Land use competition
4 Water use competition
Port Sites
In a delta Margin of a delta Along a river Natural harbors
Harbor Types
APM Terminals
Dubai Ports World
Hutchison Port Holdings
Peninsular and Oriental Ports
Port of Singapore Authority
South
America South
/ Asia /
Australi North Pacific Caribbe Middle
Holding a Europe America Asia an East Total
APM
Terminals 7 13 7 3 5 39
Dubai Ports
World 1 2 4 2 5 15
Hutchison
Port Holdings 10 22 7 1 42
Peninsular &
Oriental Ports 4 7 5 6 1 5 29
Port of
Singapore
Authority 11 20 1 32
Total 5 37 18 59 13 17 157
Basic Constraints of Port Sites
Land Access
Land Space
Port
Interface
Infrastructures
Maritime Space
Maritime Access
7.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
TEUs
3.000
2.000
1.000
0
8m 8.5m 9m 9.5m 10m 10.5m 11m 11.5m 12m 12.5m 13m
(26ft) (28ft) (30ft) (31ft) (33ft) (34ft) (36ft) (38ft) (39ft) (41ft) (43ft)
Containership draft
Number of Large and Medium Ports by Channel Depth
6 to 10 8
11 to 15 11
16 to 20 16
21 to 25 36
26 to 30 76
Channel Depth (Feet)
31 to 35 76
36 to 40 71
41 to 45 47
45 to 50 16
51 to 55 6
56 to 60 10
61 to 65 4
66 to 70 4
71 to 75 5
76 and over 33
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Number of Ports
City Port
City Size
Medium
4
4 4
3
1 2 5
2 3 4 4
Voorschoten
1400 - 1800
United Kingdom 1800 - 1900
Netherlands
1920 - 1940
Germany
Belgium
1946 - 1960
Den Haag 1960 -
Zoetermeer 1970
Luxembourg
France 1970 - 2000
ne
hi
R
Pijnacker
's-Gravenzande
's-Gravenzande Delft
Delft
Naaldwijk
Capelle aan
aan den IJssel
IJssel
Maassluis
Rotterdam
Hoogvliet
Barendrecht
Barendrecht
Hellevoetsluis
Hellevoetsluis Spijkenisse
Oud-Beijerland
Oud-Beijerland
0 1.5 3 6 9 12
Miles
Stages in Port Development
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
Period Up to the mid 19th Mid 19th century to mid Late 20th century Late 20th century, early
century 20th century 21st century
Main port function Cargo handling Cargo handling Cargo handling Cargo handling
Logistics control
Dominant cargo General cargo Bulk cargo Containers Containers and
information flows
Spatial scale Port city Port area Port region Port network
Role of port authority Nautical services Nautical services Nautical services Nautical services
Network management
LAND
SEA
Freight corridor
Load center Interior centre Deepsea liner services Regional load centre network
Shortsea/feeder services
Type Nature
Sale Port is transferred on a freehold basis but with the requirement that it be
used only to provide port services.
Concession Long-term lease of port land and facilities and the requirement that the
concessionaire undertakes specified capital investments to build, expand,
Agreement or maintain the cargo-handling facilities, equipment, and infrastructure.
Capital lease Similar to a concession except that the private sector is not explicitly
required to invest in the facilities and equipment other than for normal
maintenance and replacement over the life of the agreement.
Management contract Private sector assumes responsibility for the allocation of port labor and
equipment and provides services to the port users in the name of the port.
The port retains control over all the resources.
Service contract The private sector responsibility for performing specific port activities. The
arrangement differs from a management contract in that the private sector
provides the management, labor, and equipment required to accomplish
these activities.
Equipment lease Can be in various forms involving leaseback arrangements or supplier
credits. These agreements are used to amortize the costs to the port for
new equipment and to ensure a reliable supply of spare parts and, often,
a guaranteed level of service/reliability from this equipment
Throughput of the World’s Major Ports, 1997-2000 (in millions of metric tons)
Hamburg 1997
Marseilles 2000
Yokohama
Pusan
Antwerp
Nagoya
Hong Kong
Shanghai
Singapore
Rotterdam
Bremen/Bremerhafen
Tokyo
Tanjung Pelepas
Quingdao
Long Beach
Port Kalang
Dubai
Antwerp
Hamburg
Rotterdam
Los Angeles
Kaohsiung
Busan
Shenzhen
Shanghai
Singapore
Hong Kong
Antwerp 1985
1990
Hamburg
1995
2000
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Shanghai
Rotterdam
Kaohsiung
Busan
Singapore
Hong Kong
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
2003
20.000.000 2000
1995
1990
1985
15.000.000 1980
10.000.000
5.000.000
0
Cargo Throughput of the Port of Rotterdam, 2000
16% 15%
32%
25%
60%
52%
Total dry bulks Total liquid bulks Total general cargo Total dry bulks Total liquid bulks Total general cargo
Antwerp
Road
Rail
Inland navigation
Rotterdam
45
Millions
30 Los Angeles
Long Beach
25
Total
20
15
10
5
0
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
45
Millions
United States
40
Canada
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Value and Tonnage of Foreign Cargo Handled by Maritime Facade, United States, 1999 (in dollars and short
tons)
Value Tonnage
300 600
Millions
Billions
150 300
100 200
50 100
0
0
Atlantic Pacific Gulf of Great
Atlantic Pacific Gulf of Great
Mexico Lakes
Mexico Lakes
Transloading
A
Customer
g
c kin
Tru avel
ce t y Tr
tan E mp
g Dis
Producer Lon
B
Short Distance
Trucking
Transloading
Long Distance Rail
The Panama Canal
Atlantic Ocean
Cristobal
Colon
Gatun Dam
"
Gatun Locks
!?
Facility
!? Lock
Lake Gatun " Dam
W Continental Devide
Port
Hondu ras
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Venezuela
Panama
Gaillard Cut
W
Colombia Pedro Miguel Locks Panama Canal
!?
Panama Canal Railway
Miraflores Locks
Ecuador Balboa !?
Panama City
Pacific Ocean
±
0 5 10 20 30 40
Kilometers
Tsugaru
Japan
n
ea
China
Oc
i fic
Pac
India
a
Se
na
hi
C
h
ut
So
Malacca
Makassar
Indonesia
Torres
I n d ia n
Ocean Sunda
Lombok
Pa
ul
c
fo
ifi
c
fT
Th
O
ce
ha
ail
an
In
ila
a
di
nd
nd
an
O
Strait of Malacca
ce
an
Ma
South China Sea
la y
sia
s ia
Singapore alay
M
Indonesia
In
Indian Ocean
do
ne
si
a
Strait of Sunda
Shipping Lanes, Strategic Passages and Oil Reserves in the Middle East
Russia
China
Bosporus
Turkmenistan
Turkey
Afghanistan
Syria
Pakistan
Iraq Iran
Suez
India
Hormuz
Libya Kuwait
Egypt QA
AE
Saudi Arabia
Oman
Yemen
Turkey
Bosporus
Istanbul
Marmara Denizi
s
lle
a ne
rd
Da
Turkey
Mediterranean 40 20 0 40 Miles
Ocean
g
1 Day 0.3 Day 1 Day
5,600 km 600 km 970 km 9,870 km
The Northern East-West Ru
Freight Corridor
Halifax 8 Days Narvik 0.6 Day Tornio 1 Day Vainikkala 8.2 Days Vostochny
Haparanda/Tornio ss Freight Transport Sequence
Vostochny
ia
Finland
Narvik
Oulu
Sweden Vainikkala St. Petersburg
Harbin
Lianyungang
Beijing
Scandinavian Segment
Zabaykalsk
es
United Stat
Lanzhou
Canada Ulaanbaatar
China
Irkutsk
Mongolia
Russia
Urumqi
Novosibi rsk
Druzhba
Lokot
Astana
New York
Yekaterinburg Presnog orkovka
Boston
Kazakhstan
Perm'
Baltic
North America Western Central Asia
Europe
Hormuz
China
Mexico Havana Canton
India
Caribbean West Africa Aden
Manila
Pacific
Pacific East Africa Aceh Malacca
Ocean
Ocean Southeast Asia
Peru Indian
Brazil Ocean
Trade Route Atlantic
Dominant Capital Flow Ocean
10 hours
15 hours
20 hours
24 hours s
30 hours h our
40
Jet Engine
urs
20 h o
rs
ou
10 hours rs
h
hou
15
24
Main Commercial Passenger Aircraft, 1935-2008
Aircraft Year of First Speed (km/hr) Maximum Range at Seating Capacity
Commercial Service Full Payload (km)
Douglas DC-3 1935 346 563 30
B -7
32
77-
A-
100
( 7,4
00
km )
) km
0
,40
(11
00
7-4
-74
B
World Air Travel and World Air Freight Carried, 1950-2004
4000
140
Passengers
3500
Freight 120
3000
100
Billions of passengers-km
2500
Billions of tons-km
80
2000
60
1500
40
1000
500 20
0 0
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
04
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
50 3500
45 Gross World Product
Passengers 3000
40
Billions of passengers-km
35 2500
Trillions of $US
30 2000
25
20 1500
15 1000
10
500
5
0 0
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
Air Transportation Growth (Passengers and Freight) and Economic Growth, 1950-2001
30%
Passengers-km
25% Tons-km
GWP
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
-5%
-10%
Stage 1 Stage 3
Stage 2 Stage 4
Early Intercontinental Air Routes, 1930s
Eyeries London
Amsterdam
Paris
sr ad r
At disi
Ba ghd Zaw
Botwood Toulouse
ns
in
Ba r az
he
Br
Lisbon Marseilles
y
New York
Da
A
T lica
a
Azores
Ca angie nte Alexandria
A l pur
Ka dar
Ca bad
Jo hi
c
Gw k
s
a
ra
dh
Ag abl r
y a
Gaza
a
Ja
t
lah
Cairo
t
adi anc
Ra ab
lcu
or Ban oon
r a
it
k
wa
ng
ga eta kok
Wadi Halfa
jah
Ku
g
ar
Sh
Da Khartoum
po r
kar
re
S
Juba
Al
Sin
Nairobi
pu
n
ga
da
Mbeya
ain
Me
in
Na
Ja ang
w
ng W
tal
ar
ra ta
b
D
lem
ya
Su kar
Harare
ba
Pa
pa
Ku
Lo un ne
e
an
Rio
i
Johannesburg
Mo her
re a
isb
ng t I s
Sa d
lev ch
eJ
t
nti
Ka
Br
ane
a
ag
ille
o i ro Cape Town
Bu Imperial Airways African Route (c1933)
ar
en
ey
Ch
os
dn
Air Imperial Airways/Quantas Australian Route (c1934)
Sy
es
Aeropostale (1930)
Pu
nta KLM Amsterdam – Jakarta (1935)
Are
nas Pan American Transatlantic Route (1939)
$7.000
$6.500
$6.000
$5.000
$4.000 $4.100
$3.000
$2.600
$2.000
$1.000
$600
$0
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
World’s 10 Largest Passengers Airlines, 2000 (in 1,000 passengers)
British Airways
Air France
All Nippon Airways
Continental Airlines
Lufthansa
US Airways
Northwest Airlines
United Airlines
American Airlines
Delta Air Lines
Air France
British Airways
Northwest Airlines
Cathay Pacific
Singapore Airlines
Japan Airlines
Lufthansa
Korean Air Lines
United Parcel Service
Federal Express
After Deregulation
Hub
Hub
London
Chicago
Chicago Glasgow
Zurich
Milan
Characteristics of Major Air Travel Markets
Low population density and High population density and Dispersion of urban centers but
dispersed urban centers concentrated urban centers high regional concentrations
Relatively open air spaces and Congested air spaces and Congested gateway airports
airports airports underutilized regional airports
Rail minor competitor; Car High speed rail is a direct Except for Japan, less
compete for short distances competitor; Rail is a minor competition from other
competitor; Car compete for transportation modes
short distances
No loyalty to carriers (pricing Some lingering loyalty to Strong “imposed” loyalty to
and frequent flyers) carriers carriers
Price transparency Price becoming transparent Price not transparent
Limited income growth and Limited income growth and Growing income levels
limited leisure more leisure time
Oneworld SkyTeam
American Airlines, British Airways, Aer 21%
Lingus, Cathay Pacific, Finnair, Iberia,
LanChile, Quantas
Star
United Airlines, Lufthansa, Air Canada, Air
New Zealand, ANA, Asiana, Austrian, bmi Others
Star 38%
british midland, LOT Polish Airlines, 24%
Mexicana, SAS, Singapore, Spanair, Thai
Airways, Varig, US Airways, TAM, TAP
SkyTeam
Air France, Delta Airlines, Aeromexico,
Oneworld
Alitalia, CSA Czech Airlines, Korean Air, 17%
Northwest, Continental, KLM
Commodities Shipped by Air Freight, 2003
17%
Capital equipment
43% Intermediate materials
13%
Perishables
Computers
Apparel
Other
11%
7% 9%
14,3% Others
27,6%
Operating Expenses of the Airline Industry, 2004
15
Flight operations (fuel and pilots)
Passenger services
7,2 Administration
18,8%
Passenger
4,2%
Freight
Charter
Other
11,9%
65,1%
Seat Capacity of Selected Aircrafts, pre and post-1985
F-100
MD-90
MD-80
MD-11
DC-10
DC-9
DC-8
B777
B767
B757
B747
1,277
B737
B727
B717
A330
A321
A320
A319
A310
A300
Others
South America
Central America
Africa
Africa - Europe
Middle East
North America - Asia
Africa - South America
Europe - Asia
North America - Central America
Southwest Pacific
North America - Europe
Asia
Europe
North America
Cathay Pacific
SAS
Swissair
Japan Airlines
Singapore Airlines
KLM
American Airlines
Air France
Lufthansa
British Airways
Northwest Airlines
US Airways
American Airlines
United Airlines
Delta Air Lines
Major Air Traffic Flows Between Regions, 2000 (% of IATA Scheduled Passengers)
Airport Components
Airfield
Isle Shuttles
Terminal
Terminal
1 2 3
Airport Location Factors
City Center Low
High High
Commuting radius
Low High Low
ay
e rn runw stati
on
Nort
h Train
nal
inal rt ermi
Term enge
Fut ur e
n P as s
nsio
Expa
a y Light Rail System
runw
hern r ea
Sout ca rgo a
and
stics
Logi
To Kowloon
and Hong Kong
Airport Hubbing Level
High
Percentage Passengers Connecting 50%
25%
None 0%
BANGKOK (BKK)
MADRID (MAD)
PHOENIX (PHX)
DENVER (DEN)
AMSTERDAM (AMS)
FRANKFURT/MAIN (FRA)
PARIS (CDG)
TOKYO (HND)
LONDON (LHR)
CHICAGO (ORD)
ATLANTA (ATL)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Passenger Traffic at the World’s Largest Airports, 2004
London Heathrow
Frankfurt Intl
Chicago O'Hare
Paris De Gaulle
Tokyo Haneda
Los Angeles Intl Atlanta Hartsfield
Dallas Intl
Passengers
Less than 30 M
30 M to 40 M
40 M to 60 M
More than 60 M
CHICAGO (ORD)
SHANGHAI (PVG)
TAIPEI (TPE)
LOUISVILLE (SDF)
MIAMI (MIA)
SINGAPORE (SIN)
FRANKFURT/MAIN (FRA)
PARIS (CDG)
SEOUL (ICN)
ANCHORAGE (ANC)
TOKYO (NRT)
MEMPHIS (MEM)
New York Ny/Newark Kennedy Paris De Gaulle Incheon Hlpt Tokyo Narita
Memphis Intl
Los Angeles Intl
Louisville Standiford
Miami Int'L
Hong Kong IntlTaipei Shek
Freight
Singapore Changi
Less than 1 M
1 to 1.5 M
1.5 to 2 M
More than 2 M
SEA
BFI
GEG
PDX
LAS
RDU
LAX
BNA
ONT TUL MEM CLT
ABQ
PHX HSV CAE
SAN ATL
DFW
ELP SHV
JAX
60.000
50.000
40.000
Waterborne
Railroad
30.000
Highway
20.000 Air Carriers
10.000
0
1970 1980 1990 2001 2003
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Impact speed (km/h)
Loss of Life per 10,000 Vehicles, OECD Countries, 1993-1995
United States
Netherland
Germany
Canada
Australia
Japan
Switzerland
UK
Norway
Sweden
Mobility
Mobility Paradox Costs
Costs
Growing
Growingdemand
demand Internal
Internalcosts
costs(users)
(users)
Motorization
Motorization External
Externalcosts
costs(society)
(society)
Energy
Energy(petroleum)
(petroleum) Environmental
Environmentalimpacts
impacts
The Environmental System
Atmosphere
Ecosphere
H
e
yd
er
r
ph
os
os
ph
th
er
Li
e
Biosphere
The Environmental
1. ATMOSPHERE Impacts of Transportation
Large scale diffusion of pollutants. 4. ECOSPHERE
High growth on a short term basis of the concentration of pollutants because of
local conditions (e.g. smog). 4.1 AQUATIC ECOSPHERE
Photochemical reactions caused by ultraviolet rays, notably over ozone, sulfur Alteration of ecosystems in unforeseeable ways.
dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Disappearance of vulnerable species and proliferation of tolerant ones.
Climatic changes (global warming). Reduction of bacterial treatment of organic matter by nitrification.
Acid rain. Reduction of available nutrients to aquatic species.
Synergetic effects when pollutants are combined (e.g. smog and greenhouse Reproductive impediments.
gases). 4.2 LAND ECOSPHERE
Damages over the vegetation modifying:
2. HYDROSPHERE hydric cycles.
Diffusion of pollutants in a dissolved or colloidal state. the level of underground water resources.
soil erosion.
Acidification and loss of neutralizing potential of ground and underground water.
air purification capacity of the ecosphere.
Drops of pH following snow melting (aquatic organism are particularly vulnerable). food sources (agriculture).
Growth in the solubility of several metals because of acidification. entertainment and tourism.
Additions of organic compounds, aluminum, manganese, calcium, magnesium and Reduction of the vital space.
potassium by runoffs. Reduction of the genetic potential of species.
Contamination of ground and underground water by nitrates. Reduction of the food supply and alteration of the food chain.
Consumption of resources.
4.3 HUMAN ECOSPHERE
Odors.
3. LITHOSPHERE Noise.
Acid depositions. Cardiovascular and respiratory problems.
Liberation of toxic metallic ions (aluminum, cadmium, etc.) through acidification. Susceptibility to infection.
Loss of nutrients, notably calcium and magnesium. Drops in life expectancy.
Inhibition of the miniralization of nitrogen. Injuries, incapacity, hospitalization, death.
Modifications in the compositions and the depth of decomposition gradient. Damage to structures:
Inhibition of decomposition. loss of useful life. (amortization)
Loss of the soil flora and fauna. loss of property values.
Fixation by plants of heavy metals (e.g. lead) and contamination. corrosion of metal structures (bronze, steel, etc.).
Removal and consumption of land. destruction of historical and cultural monuments.
Extraction of raw materials like mineral products and energy.
Estimated Automobile Costs
32%
23%
Activity
Activity Mode
Mode Traffic
Traffic
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Road
Road
Vehicle
Vehiclemanufacture
manufacture
Rail
Rail Passengers
Passengers
Vehicle
Vehicletravel
travel
Maritime
Maritime Freight
Freight
Vehicle
Vehiclemaintenance
maintenance
Air
Air
Vehicle
Vehicledisposal
disposal
Transportation Systems and the Environment
Level of emissions
Traffic Level of energy consumption
Bus
Mode Walking Nature of energy consumption
Rail
CO2
Global
Duration
NOX
Regional
Lead Local
Particulates
Noise
Space
The Concept of Externalities
C(L1) Externalities
ΔC(L1)
0 L1 L(O) L
Level of intervention
Sources of Energy
Chemical
Chemical
• •Fossil
Fossilfuels
fuels(Combustion)
(Combustion)
Non-Renewable
Non-Renewable Nuclear
Nuclear
• •Uranium
Uranium(Fission
(Fissionofofatoms)
atoms)
Chemical
Chemical
Energy
Energy • •Muscular
Muscular(Oxidization)
(Oxidization)
Nuclear
Nuclear
• •Geothermal
Geothermal(Conversion)
(Conversion)
• •Fusion
Fusion(Fusion
(Fusionofofhydrogen)
hydrogen)
Gravity
Gravity
Renewable
Renewable • •Tidal,
Tidal,hydraulic
hydraulic(Kinetic)
(Kinetic)
Indirect
IndirectSolar
Solar
• •Biomass
Biomass(Photosynthesis)
(Photosynthesis)
• •Wind
Wind(Pressure
(Pressuredifferences)
differences)
Direct
DirectSolar
Solar
• •Photovoltaic
Photovoltaiccell
cell(Conversion)
(Conversion)
Wood
Coal
Crude Oil
Kerosene
Ethanol
Methanol
Methane
Natural Gas
Gasoline
Hydrogen
Animal
Late 20th Century
Biomass
Coal
Early 20th Century Oil
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Mid 19th Century Hydrogen
15th Century
100
Wood
Coal
80
Solids Gases
60
Hydrogen
40
Liquids
20
Oil
0 Natural Gas
1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150
World Fossil Fuel Consumption per Source, 1950-2002 (in million of tons of equivalent oil)
8000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
800
700 Non-OECD
OECD
600
Quadrillion Btu
500
400
300
200
100
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2003 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Energy Consumption in the Transportation Sector, G7 Countries, 1995
100
90 Transportation Consumption
80 Other Energy Consumption
70
60
Exajoules
50
40
30
20
10
0
Canada France Germany Italy Japan UK USA
Energy Consumed by the Transportation Sector, United States, 1949-1999 (in billions of BTUs)
30.000.000
20.000.000
15.000.000
10.000.000
5.000.000
49
52
55
58
61
64
67
70
73
76
79
82
85
88
91
94
97
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
253
1000 20
HC
CO
NOx 15
Emissions (grams)
% of Vehicle-km
100
10
10
5
1 0
5 10 20 30 35 45 55 60 70 80 85 95 100
Speed (in km/hr)
1,4
Portugal
1,2
1
Dollars per liter
0,8
0,4 Canada
R2 = 0,7704 United States
0,2
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Liters per person
Distance Driven and Carbon Emissions, U.S. Automobile Fleet, 1970-2000
350 4
2,5
Trillion KM
200
2
150
1,5
100
1
50 0,5
0 0
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
00
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
80 Busy crossroads
70 Noise level near a motorway
60 Busy street through open windows
40
30 Quiet room
20 Broadcasting studio
10 Desert
0
A. Economia, Comércio e Transporte
B. Modos de Transporte
C. Custos de Transporte
D. Logística e Terminais
F. Rodovia e Intermodalidade
G. Ferrovia
H. Marítimo
I. Aéreo
J. Ambiente
L. Transporte Urbano
Slides adaptados de:
Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2006 Vitor Caldeirinha
Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY vitorcaldeirinha@netvisao.pt
Industrial
Revolution Mass Production Globalization
Individual
Motorized
Collective
Non-motorized
Economic Development
640
China
13
Vehicle Fleet Size for Industrialized Vehicle Ownership Level
Current Size of Vehicle Fleet (1999)
513
India
8
4,5
World
4 Developed countries
Developing countries
3,5
2,5
1,5
0,5
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Tokyo
Mumbai
Mexico
São Paulo
New York
Delhi
Shanghai
Calcutta
Dhaka
Jakarta
Lagos
Karachi
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Cities with more than 5 Million People, 2000
Saint Petersburg
Moscow
London
Paris
Chicago Essen Istanbul BeijingTianjinSeoul
Los Angeles New York
Lahore Osaka
Cairo Delhi ChongqingWuhan
Karachi Calcutta Shanghai
Mexico City Santiago Hyderabad
BangaloreMadras Bangkok
Santiago Lagos
Kinshasa Jakarta
Lima
Rio de Janeiro
Santiago
Buenos Aires
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Asia
Latin America
North America
Europe
2030
Africa 2000
1975
World 1950
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Urban Population by Region, 1950-2030 (in millions)
Asia
Latin America
North America
Europe 2030
2000
1975
Africa
1950
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
r(NA) r(E)
Density
Density
IV
III
I II I II III IV
Distance Distance
I - Prior to mechanized transport
II - Early forms of mechanized transport (tramways)
III - Diffusion of motor vehicles (buses, automobiles)
IV - Suburbanization
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Average Journey to Work Travel Time, 1990
40
35
30
25
Minutes
20
15
10
0
United States Western Europe Japan Other Asia Australia
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Spatial
imprint
Infrastructures
Modes Transportation Urban Form
Users
Spatial
interaction
Labor
Urban Spatial Structure
Customers Activity
Suppliers
Spatial
location
Pace of Change
Employment Population
Fast
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
X
X X
X X X
X
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X X
Metro station Transit rail station Bus stop Shuttle stop Paratransit Taxi service
X
Express stop boundary
Transfer
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Types of Urban Movements
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
3%
20%
Work
Shopping
School
Business (Work)
49% 15% Business (Personnal)
Home
Other
5%
3%
5%
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Urban Travel by Purpose and by Time of the Day in a North American Metropolis
35
Shopping
30 Social / Recreation
Work
25 Total trips
Percentage
20
15
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
14
12
10
0
1AM 3AM 5AM 7AM 9AM 11AM 1PM 3PM 5PM 7PM 9PM 11PM
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Modal Split for Global Cities, 1995
100
90
80
70
Private Motor Vehicle
60
Transit
50 Walking / Cycling
40
30
20
10
0
Chinese Cities American Cities Australian West European High Income Low Income
Cities Cities Asian Cities Asian Cities
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
100%
80%
Cycling
60%
Walking
Transit
40% Private Car
20%
0%
New York Houston London Shanghai
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Modal Split for Some Asian Cities, 1990s
100%
80%
20%
0%
Bangkok Kuala Jakarta Tokyo Manila Singapore Hong
Lumpur Kong
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
100%
90%
80%
70%
Other non walk
60% Taxi
50% Bus
40% Subway
30% Automobile
20%
10%
0%
1980 1990 2000
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Key Issues in Urban Freight Transportation
Issue Challenge
Increasing volume of freight moving in urban areas Capacity of urban freight transport systems
Changes in the nature of freight distribution Smaller volumes and time-sensitive freight
Environmental issues Growing demand for reverse logistic flows (waste and
recycling)
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
13%
17%
Increase in population
Increase in trips
17%
Decrease in vehicle occupancy
35%
Switch to driving
18%
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Levels of Automobile Dependency
Car only
Automobile Dependency High
75%
Medium
50%
Low
Transportation
alternatives
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
High
Au pe
Worst case
Congestion
to nd
e
m en
ob c
ile y
TIME
Low
M
ix
ed
Tr
Best case
an
si
t
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
The Vicious Circle of Congestion
Congestion
Public
Public pressures
pressures
The
The number
number of
of to
to increase
increase
movements
movements capacity
capacity
increases
increases
New capacity
The
The average
average
length
length of
of Movements
Movements
movements
movements are
are easier
easier
increases Urban
Urban sprawl
sprawl
increases
is
is favored
favored
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
100%
90%
80%
70%
Extreme
60%
Severe
50% Heavy
40% Moderate
Uncongested
30%
20%
10%
0%
1982 1990 1997 2003
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Parking Accumulation by Land Use by Time of the Day
100
90
80
70
Percent of Peak Parking
60
50
40
Residential
30 Office
20 Retail
10 Restaurant
Cinema
0
6AM 7AM 8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM 12AM 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM 8PM 9PM 10PM
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
Recurring Congestion
Traffic
Capacity
Congestion
Unused Capacity
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Copyright © 1998-2007, Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University. For personal or classroom use ONLY. This material (including graphics) is not public domain and cannot be
published, in whole or in part, in ANY form (printed or electronic) and on any media without consent. This includes conference presentations. Permission MUST be requested prior to use.
A. Economia, Comércio e Transporte
B. Modos de Transporte
C. Logística e Terminais
F. Rodovia, Ferrovia e Intermodalidade
G. Marítimo
I. Aéreo
J. Externalidades
L. Transporte Urbano