Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Wireless Communication
S. Shahid1, M. Rizwan1, M.A.B. Abbasi1, M.A. Tarar1, S.M. Abbas2
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS),
National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan
I.
INTRODUCTION
1744
(a)
(b)
II.
Fig. 4. Simulated S11 for first design phase of the proposed antenna
B. Antenna Modeling
Different antenna modeling phases are shown in Fig. 3.
Antenna is designed in near body environment along with
performance analysis at flat, 30o and 60o bend angles. The
dimensions of transmission line are kept as 1.2x17.1mm2 for
50 impedance matching as show in Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 3. The
design is created by combining rectangular and circular
patches with rectangular dimensions 56x56mm2 and circular
radius 25mm [11-13]. Using rectangular patch, benefits of
radiation are acquired from radiating edges while nonradiating edges do not play any significant role. Circular patch
is introduced to convert non-radiating edges of rectangular
patch to radiating edges [8]. Partial grounding technique was
also used for bandwidth enhancement but back lobes in
radiation patterns were also mitigated by applying different
meandering techniques [12].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 5. Simulated S11 for second design phase of the proposed antenna
1745
Fig. 6. Simulated S11 for third design phase of the proposed antenna
III.
B. Radiation Patterns
Antenna with omnidirectional radiation patterns along the
body surface is required for better on-body radio channel
performance at lower frequencies of 800-900MHz. This is
also necessary to achieve power-efficient body-centric
wireless communication whereas directional patterns are
desired for higher frequencies around 2GHz for off-body
radio propagation. Close to omni-directional radiation patterns
are achieved at 865MHz for on-body to on-body
communication, slight defragmentation in patterns is observed
for 30o and 60o bend angles. Mostly directional patterns,
outward from body, are achieved at 1.8, 2.1 and 2.5GHz for
on-body to off-body communication, as desired. Acceptable
change in radiation patterns in observed for bending angles of
30o and 60o. Radiation patterns at different frequencies with
bending effect on antenna radiation performance are shown in
Fig. 9.
For wide band short-range on-body communication,
antennas with suitable gain of above 0dB are desired. Near the
human body, gain and radiation efficiency are frequencydependent as electromagnetic properties of body tissues vary
with frequency. When the WB antenna is placed in flat
position, the gain reduces to 1.9B in the lower frequency band
of 1.8GHz, while increases up to 4.2dB in the higher
frequency band of 2.5GHz. The antenna placement distance
(5mm) hasnt affected the effect gain for the on-body gain for
WB antennas. Moreover, when the antenna is placed at bend
angle of 30o, gain at 2.5GHz remains in the range of 2.9dB,
but at bend angle of 60o, the gain reduces to 1.88 due to
destructive interference caused by the lossy tissues of body.
Antenna behaves oppositely at frequencies of 865MHz and
1.8GHz; gain at 30o bend angle is less than gain at 60o bend
angle. The gain of antenna over the frequency of 0.7-2.9GHz
at 5mm from the body is in the range of 0.25 to 4.2dB. Results
show that as the bend angle of antenna increases, peak gain of
the proposed antenna decreases due frequency detuning by
high lossy human body tissues.
1746
0
30
-30
-4.00
-30
30
30
2.00
-4.80
-8.00
-60
0.00
-7.60
60
-60
-60
60
60
-12.00
-10.40
-2.00
-16.00
-13.20
-4.00
-90
90
-90
90
-90
90
Curve Info
Curve Info
Freq='0.865GHz' Phi='90deg'
-120
120
-150
Curve Inf o
Freq='0.865GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='0.865GHz' Phi='90deg'
Freq='0.865GHz' Phi='0deg'
-120
150
Freq='0.865GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='0.865GHz' Phi='90deg'
-120
120
-150
-180
120
-150
150
(b) 30deg
(c) 60deg
0
-30
30
-30
-1.00
150
-180
-180
(a) 0deg
-30
30
30
-5.50
-2.00
-4.50
-60
60
-9.00
-60
-8.50
-60
60
-8.00
-16.00
-11.50
-11.50
-23.00
-14.50
-90
90
Curve Info
-120
-30
Freq='1.8GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='1.8GHz' Phi='90deg'
-150
-90
120
90
-120
-90
90
-120
120
Curve Info
120
Curve Info
Freq='1.8GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='1.8GHz' Phi='90deg'
150
-150
-180
-150
150
(e) 30o
(f) 60o
-30
30
-30
0.00
30
-30
0.00
-5.00
60
30
-2.00
-10.00
-60
Freq='1.8GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='1.8GHz' Phi='90deg'
150
-180
-180
(d) 0o
-60
-9.00
60
-60
60
-10.00
-20.00
-16.00
-15.00
-30.00
-23.00
-90
90
60
-90
90
-90
90
Curve Inf o
-120
Freq='2.1GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='2.1GHz' Phi='90deg'
-150
120
-120
120
Curve Inf o
-120
150
-150
150
-180
-180
(g) 0o
(h) 30o
-150
30
-30
-5.00
-180
30
-30
-1.00
-10.00
60
30
-2.00
-7.00
-60
Freq='2.1GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='2.1GHz' Phi='90deg'
150
(i) 60o
-30
-60
60
-9.00
-60
-15.00
-13.00
-16.00
-20.00
-19.00
-23.00
-90
90
120
Curve Info
Freq='2.1GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='2.1GHz' Phi='90deg'
-90
90
60
-90
90
Curve Info
Freq='2.5GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='2.5GHz' Phi='90deg'
-120
-150
150
120
-120
120
Curve Inf o
-120
-150
150
-180
-180
(j) 0o
(k) 30o
-150
150
-180
(l) 60o
Fig. 9. Antenna radiation patterns at different frequencies, (a-c) 865MHz (d-f) 1.8GHz (g-i) 2.1GHz (j-l) 2.5GHz
1747
120
Curve Info
Freq='2.5GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='2.5GHz' Phi='90deg'
Freq='2.5GHz' Phi='0deg'
Freq='2.5GHz' Phi='90deg'
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
Frequency /
Bend Angle
0o
30o
60o
865MHz
1.8GHz
2.1GHz
2.5GHz
2.13
0.35
0.85
1.90
1.27
0.44
3.38
1.86
0.53
4.20
2.90
1.88
IV.
[3]
[4]
CONCLUSION
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
1748