Age, Composition, and Source of Continental Arc - and Syn-Collision Granites of The Neoproterozoic Sergipano Belt, Southern Borborema Province, Brazil

Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 257e280
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of South American Earth Sciences

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames
Age, composition, and source of continental arc- and syn-collision

granites of the Neoproterozoic Sergipano Belt, Southern Borborema
Province, Brazil
Elson P. Oliveira a, *, Juliana F. Bueno a, Neal J. McNaughton b, Adejardo F. Silva Filho c,
P. Donatti-Filho a
Rosemery S. Nascimento d, Jose
a
Department of Geology and Natural Resources, Institute of Geosciences, P.O. Box 6152, State University of Campinas e UNICAMP, 13083-970 Campinas,
SP, Brazil
b
John de Laeter Centre of Mass Spectrometry, School of Applied Physics, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
c
Department of Geology, Federal University of Pernambuco, 50740-530 Recife, PE, Brazil
d
Faculty of Geology, Geosciences Institute, Federal University of Para, Bel
em 66075-110, Brazil
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 30 March 2014
Accepted 6 August 2014
Available online 21 August 2014
The Sergipano belt is the outcome of collision between the Pernambuco-Alagoas Domain (Massif) and
the S~
ao Francisco Craton during Neoproterozoic assembly of West Gondwana. Although the understanding of the Sergipano belt evolution has improved signicantly, the timing of emplacement,
geochemistry and tectonic setting of granitic bodies in the belt is poorly known. We recognized two
, Poo Redondo and Macurure
domains, and 590
granite age groups: 630e618 Ma granites in the Caninde
metasedimentary domain. UePb SHRIMP zircon ages for granites of
e570 Ma granites in the Macurure
rst age group indicated ages of 631 4 Ma for the Stios Novos granite, 623 7 Ma for the Poo Redondo
granite, 619 3.3 Ma for the Lajedinho monzodiorite, and 618 3 Ma for the Queimada Grande
granodiorite. These granitoids are dominantly high-K calc-alkaline, magnesian, metaluminous, mac
enclave-rich (Queimada Grande and Lajedinho), or with abundant inherited zircon grains (Poo Redondo
and Sitios Novos). Geochemical and isotope data allow us to propose that Stios Novos and Poo Redondo
granites are product of partial melting of Poo Redondo migmatites. Sr-Nd isotopes of the Queimada
Grande granodiorite and Lajedinho monzodiorite suggest that their parental magma may have originated
by mixing between a juvenile mac source and a crustal component that could be the Poo Redondo
metasediments. Other 630e618 Ma granites in the belt are the mac
migmatites or the Macurure
~o Sa
granodiorite and the Camar
sedimentary domain.
enclave-rich Coronel Joa
a tonalite in the Macurure
These granites have similar geochemical and isotopic characteristics as the Lajedinho and Queimada
tonalite and Coronel Joa
~o S
Grande granitoids. We infer for the Camara
a granodiorite that their parental
magmas have had contributions from mac lower crust and felsic upper crust, most probably from
underthrust S~
ao Francisco Craton, or Pernambuco-Alagoas Domain. The younger 590e570 Ma granite
metasedimentary domain. Although these granites do not show
group is conned to the Macurure
typical features of S-type granites, their UePb age, eld relationships, geochemical and Sr-Nd data
micassuggest that their parental magmas have originated from high degree melting of the Macurure
domain, limited by the Belo Montechists. Field observations support a model in which the Macurure
~o Miguel do Aleixo shear zones, behaved as a ductile channel ow for magma
Jeremoabo and Sa
migration and emplacement during the Neoproterozoic, very much like the channel ow model proposed for emplacement of leucogranites in the Himalayas.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Sergipano belt
Granites
Geochemistry
UePb geochronology
SreNd isotopes
West Gondwana
1. Introduction
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: elson@ige.unicamp.br (E.P. Oliveira).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2014.08.003
0895-9811/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Granites are of prime importance in studies of crustal evolution

because they are one of the main components of continental areas,
are related in space and time with orogenic belts, and isolate
258
E.P. Oliveira et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 257e280
snapshots of the superimposed deformations as they freeze part of

their structural evolution. During ascent through the lithosphere,
granitic magmas crosscut an expressive crustal thickness and
entrain xenoliths from both their sources and the country rocks. For
this reason, granites are of particular geological interest for direct
and indirect investigation of how the continental crust evolves.
Granites are a common component of the Sergipano belt but
their ages and petrogenesis are only locally known (e.g. Silva Filho
et al., 1997; Guimar~
aes and Silva Filho, 1995; McReath et al., 1998;
Long et al., 2005). More uncertain is their tectonic signicance
(e.g. Bueno et al., 2009), melt source(s) and evolution. The belt is
one of the most important Precambrian orogenic belts of Northeastern Brazil, not only because it was considered as evidence for
continental drift (e.g. Allard and Hurst, 1969), but also because it
contains several structural and lithologic domains that allow it to
be compared with Phanerozoic orogens (Oliveira et al., 2006, 2010).
The Sergipano belt is located in the southernmost part of the Borborema Province (Fig. 1) and originated through collision between
~o Francisco Craton and the Pernambuco-Alagoas
the Congo-Sa
Domain during the Neoproterozoic Brasiliano/Pan-African
Orogeny (e.g. Brito Neves et al., 1977; Van Schmus et al., 1995;
Brito Neves and Fuck, 2013). It is a key belt for reconstructing part of
the history of West Gondwana assembly.
In this paper we present eld relationships, new UePb zircon
ages, whole-rock geochemichal and Sr-Nd isotope data for granites
of the Sergipano Belt as a contribution to understanding their
source(s) and evolution. Our results indicated that crust- and
mantle-derived magmas conributed to granite genesis, and that
both arc-like and syn-collision granites are present in domains of
the Sergipano belt.
2. The Sergipano Belt, NE-Brazil
The Sergipano Belt is a triangular shape orogenic belt with
WNW-ESE direction (Fig. 1), located in the southern part of Borborema Province, NE-Brazil. It comprises ve lithostructural do, Poo Redondo-Maranco
, Macurure
, Vaza Barris
mains: Caninde
^ncia (Davison and Santos, 1989; Del-Rey Silva, 1995;
and Esta
Oliveira et al., 2006, 2010) limited each from the other by the
, Belo
following major shear zones from north to south: Macurure
~o Miguel do Aleixo and Itaporanga (Fig. 1).
Monte-Jeremoabo, Sa
, Vaza Barris and Esta

^ncia are dominated by metaThe Macurure
morphic to non-metamorphic sedimentary rocks, whereas the
other domains are more diverse and composed of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks. Granites are abundant in the
, Caninde
, and Poo Redondo-Maranco
domains (Fig. 2).
Macurure
Three main events of regional deformation are recognized in the
sedimentary domains of the belt (Del-Rey Silva, 1995; Oliveira
et al., 2010; and references therein). The rst event is characterized by south-verging D1 nappes and thrust zones, which probably
and Vaza
displaced the metasedimentary rocks of the Macurure
~o FranBarris domains for large distances over the edge of the Sa
cisco Craton in the south; a few granitic bodies were emplaced into
Domain during or shortly after D1. The D2 event is
the Macurure
marked by reactivation of D1 and has a transpressive character
associated with signicant vertical movements; most granite plutons were emplaced during this event. The D3 event is the last
ductile deformation event in the Sergipano Belt and it took place
during uplift of the belt in response to compression in a brittle to
ductile-brittle regime.

Part of the studied granites (Fig. 2) occurs in the Macurure
domain, which is mostly composed of garnet micaschists with
domain was metaminor marble and quartzites. The Macurure
morphosed under amphibolite facies conditions and is separated
~o Miguel do
from the Vaza Barris Domain in the south by the Sa
Domain in
Aleixo shear zone, and from the Poo Redondo-Maranco
the north by the Belo Monte-Jeremoabo shear zone. The original
sedimentary basin and its depositional settings are no longer easy
to reconstruct owing to deformation and erosion. However, in less
domain,
metamorphic or deformed portions of the Macurure
Davison and Santos (1989) recognized centimetre-thick rhythmic
layers of micaschists, with plane-parallel structures and abrupt
contact indicative of deposition in deep water settings such as
turbidites. Also, Oliveira et al. (2010) report on a sequence of chaotic
blocks of mica-schist, phyllite, meta-rhythmite and rare granite
embedded in a meta-sandstone matrix; the entire rock package
was subsequently deformed by D2. The authors interpret this
sequence as an ancient alluvial fan and suggest a signicant time
gap between the D1 and D2 deformation events.
domain
The granites occupy large portion of the Macurure
(Fig. 2) and are of two types: (1) pre-collisional granites (pre-to
early-D2 granites) including tonalite-granodiorite of restrict
~o Francisco Craton, BP-Borborema Province. B. The Sergipano Belt and its

Fig. 1. Symplied geology of the Sergipano Belt. A. Location of the Sergipano Belt (square) in Brazil. SFC-Sa
, Belo Monte-Jeremoabo, Sa
~o Miguel do Aleixo and Itaporanga shear
domains (modied after Oliveira et al., 2010). MSZ, BMJSZ, SMASZ and ISZ stand, respectively for the Macurure
zones.
259
domain: 1- Angico, 2- Areias, 3- Lagoas,

Fig. 2. Geological map of part of the Sergipano Belt showing the main granite plutons. Numbers refer to the following granitoids: Macurure
ria, 9- Capivara, 10- Carabas, 11- Pedra Furada, 12- Monte Alegre, 13- Camara
, 14- Coronel Joa
~o S a
; Poo Redondo-Maranco

4- Santa Helena, 5- Canudos, 6- Formosa, 7- Itabi, 8- Glo
domains: 15- Stios Novos, 16- Queimada Grande, 17- Poo Redondo, and 18- Lajedinho. Insert is a zoom of the Garar region. PEAL e Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif; CD e
and Caninde
Domain; PRMD e Poo Redondo-Maranco
Domain; MRD e Macurure
Domain; VBD e Vaza Barris Domain. MSZ, BMJSZ and SMASZ stand; respectively for Macurure
, Belo
Caninde
~o Miguel do Aleixo shear zones.
Monte-Jeremoabo and Sa
occurrence with numerous micaschist xenoliths; these granites

were later deformed during D2 and D3; (2) syn-collisional granites
(syn-to late-D2 granites), which comprise mostly pink granites and
less often grey granodiorites. The syn-collisional granites are sheetlike bodies that preserve magmatic structures such as mineral
banding, abundant schlieren and mac enclaves paralleling the
host rocks S2 foliation. These granites were injected as sheets along
the F2 fold hinges and the axial plane foliation of micaschists, ultimately forming plutons of large size. In some places, the granites
crosscut the schists S2 foliation (Bueno et al., 2009). Bueno et al.
(2009) have obtained UePb (zircon, SHRIMP) age of 628 12 Ma
tonalite and UePb (titanite, TIMS)
for the pre-to early-D2 Camara
ages of 584 10 Ma and 571 9 Ma for the syn-to tardi-D2 Angico
and Pedra Furada granites, respectively. Using the age of the
tonalite as a maximum age for onset of the main collisional
Camara
event (D2) in the belt and the age of the Pedra Furada granite as the
waning stage of D2 event, the authors have suggested that the main
collision, and its related magmatism, may have lasted at least 57
million years.

The other studied granites occur in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
domain (Fig. 2). The Poo Redondo-Maranco

domain and Caninde
domain was further divided into two sub-domains, namely Poo
(Oliveira et al., 2010). The former is
Redondo and Maranco
composed of migmatites and granites, and the latter by pelitic to
psammitic metasedimentary rocks, rhythmites interleaved with
calc-alkaline andesite to dacite, intercalations of basalt, andesite,
gabbro, and serpentinites. Granodiorite palaeosomes of the Poo
Redondo migmatites yielded two UePb SHRIMP ages of 980 Ma and
961 Ma; they also show slightly negative to positive Nd(T) values,
and dominant calcic to calc-alkaline geochemistry. On the other
hand, the swarm of dacite-andesite sills or lavas in slates and
sub-domain are ca. 603 Ma old, show calkphyllites of the Maranco
alkaline to alkali-calcic major element signature, and negative Nd(T)
values. Oliveira et al. (2010) suggested that the andesite and dacites
sub-domain and the protoliths of the migmatites of
of the Maranco
the Poo Redondo sub-domain formed in continental arcs.
domain include
The granitoids of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
the Sitios Novos, Queimada Grande and Poo Redondo granitoids
(Fig. 2). The Sitios Novos and Queimada Grande granitoids are
typical I-type granites to monzogranites, occasionally with

numerous mac enclaves, whereas the Poo Redondo granodiorite
is more homogeneous. All of these granites are emplaced into the
Poo Redondo migmatites.
The Lajedinho monzodiorite (Fig. 2) is another granite body
selected for this study. It contains oriented mac enclaves, and
domain. The Caninde
Domain contains the
occurs in the Caninde
following lithodemic units: (i) The Novo Gosto-Mulungu unit is
made up of ne-grained amphibolites intercalated with phyllites,
metasiltstones, metacherts, graphite schists, calc-silicate rocks and
marbles, cross-cut by mac and felsic dykes, granites and FeeTirich gabbros (Nascimento et al., 2005; Oliveira and Tarney, 1990;
Oliveira et al., 2010); (ii) The Garrote unit is a continuous, up to
2 km-wide, strongly deformed granite sheet intrusive into rocks of
the Novo Gosto-Mulungu unit; (iii) The Gentileza unit is made up of
amphibolites and diorites intercalated with porphyritic quartzmonzonite, and minor dolerite and gabbroic bodies; (iv) The Can gabbroic complex comprises massive and layered olivineinde
gabbronorite, leucogabbro, anorthosite, troctolite, and minor
pegmatitic gabbro, norite and peridotite. Granites, granodiorites,
and rapakivi granites cross-cut these units. Oliveira et al. (2010)
Domain as a rift sequence that was later
interpreted the Caninde
Domain.
deformed and accreted to the Poo Redondo-Maranco
3. Granites: eld characteristics and petrography
The granites studied here can be separated into two age groups:
630e618 Ma and 590e570 Ma. The rst group occurs in the Mac, Poo Redondo-Maranco
, and Caninde
domains, whereas the
urure
domain. Because in the
second group is conned to the Macurure
latter domain the deformation events are well established, Bueno
et al. (2009) named the two granite groups as pre-collisional
granites (pre-to early-D2 granites; 630e618 Ma) and syncollisional granites (syn-to tardi-D2 granites; 590e570 Ma). In the
domain the 630e618 Ma granite group
Poo Redondo-Maranco
includes the Stios Novos, Queimada Grande and Poo Redondo
domain it includes only the
granitoids, whereas in the Caninde
Lajedinho monzodiorite (Fig. 2). Details of all of these granitoids are
presented below.
260
3.1. Granites in the Macurur

e domain
domain pre-collisional granitoids include granoThe Macurure
diorites to tonalites. They are composed of quartz, biotite, hornblende, plagioclase and epidote, and the accessories titanite, apatite
and allanite with epidote core. Representatives of the group are the
~o Sa
granodiorite (Long et al., 2005) and the Camar
Coronel Joa
a
tonalite (Bueno et al., 2009). These granitoids contain mac enclaves (Fig. 3A) and/or xenoliths of garnet-biotite schists (Fig. 3B,
Camar
a tonalite), and they are variably deformed. The Camar
a
tonalite shows a penetrative foliation paralleling the micaschist
foliation, and contains quartz with undulose extinction and subgrain boundaries, as well as quartz ribbons along the S2 foliation.
The plagioclase shows mechanical twinning, undulose extinction
and subgrain boundaries; sometimes it is more deformed and
shows recrystallized tail and pressure shadows with quartz. The
~o Sa
granodiorite shows no record of penetrative
Coronel Joa
deformation in its central portion; the granite shows igneous foliation marked by attened mac enclaves and schlieren of elongated hornblende (Fig. 3C). On the other hand, macroscopic
~o S
deformation is common at its margin (Fig. 3D). The Coronel Joa
a
granodiorite shows quartz and biotite with undulose extinction and
plagioclase with mechanical twinning.
The syn-collisional granites are comprised mostly by pink
granites and less often by grey granodiorites. The granitoids are
ne-to medium grained, with equigranular texture and interlobate
grain boundaries. They are composed mostly of quartz, microcline,
plagioclase, biotite, muscovite, and epidote. The accessory minerals
are allanite, zircon, apatite and titanite.
domain are sheetThe syn-collisional granites in the Macurure
like bodies with preserved magmatic structures such as mineral
banding, abundant schlieren and mica-rich enclaves paralleling the
host rocks S2 foliation (Fig. 4A). These granites were emplaced as
sheets along the F2 fold hinges and axial plane foliation of the
micaschists (Fig. 4B), eventually forming large plutons, such as the
Itabi granite (#7 in Fig. 2). In some places, the granites crosscut the
schists S2 foliation. Some of the granites are massive, whereas

others are strongly deformed with penetrative foliation, but all of
them contain microstructures indicative of solid-state deformation
such as undulose extinction of quartz and biotite, quartz and feldspar recrystallization by subgrain rotation and boundary migration,
and static recrystallization of quartz grains (Bueno et al., 2009).
Where the granite plutons are intrusive into micaschists, the contact is knife sharp and rare contact metamorphism is observed.
These granites contain large rafts of metasedimentary rocks
(Fig. 4C) and abundant biotite-rich schlieren aligned parallel to the
S2 schist foliation (Fig. 4D).
domain
3.2. Granites in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
domain
The main granite plutons in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
are the Queimada Grande granodiorite, Stios Novos granite and
Poo Redondo granite. These granitoids form E-W elongated bodies
(Fig. 2), and are representatives of the 630e618 Ma age group in the
Sergipano belt.
The Queimada Grande granodiorite (#16 in Fig. 2) is a large
intrusion in the domain, and contains many mac enclaves
(Fig. 5A), as well as biotite-rich schlieren. It shows different structures in the centre and at the margins. In the intrusion centre, the
granodiorite is porphyritic with centimetre-long K-feldspar phenocrysts; it does not show macroscopic deformational structures,
but presents microstructures indicative of solid-state deformation
such as undulose extinction of quartz and biotite and quartz
recrystallization by boundary migration. On its northern and
southern margins, the pluton is more deformed; it is ne-grained
with biotite-rich schlieren and oriented mac enclaves, which
dene a high angle magmatic foliation. This part of the granodiorite
shows undulose extinction of quartz and biotite, quartz and feldspar recrystallization by subgrain rotation and boundary migration,
static recrystallization of quartz grains, and plagioclase with mechanical twinning. In the northern contact with the Poo Redondo
migmatite the Queimada Grande granodiorite foliation parallels
domain 630e618 Ma granitoids. A) Camara

Tonalite with mac enclaves; B) and deformed xenoliths of garnet-biotite schist; C) Isotropic feature of
Fig. 3. Field aspects of Macurure
~o S
micaschist.
Coronel Joa
a granodiorite with aligned enclaves in its central portion; and D) deformed by D2 in the northern contact with the Macurure
261
domain. A) Santa Helena granite (#4 in Fig. 2) emplaced and parallel to the S2 foliation of host micaschists; B)
Fig. 4. Field aspects of the syn-to late-D2 granites in the Macurure
Angico granite (#1 in Fig. 2) emplaced along the axial plane of F2 fold; C) Angico granite with rafts of metasedimentary rocks; D) Areias granite (#2 in Fig. 2) with biotite-rich
schlieren paralleling the micaschist S2 foliation. Insert shows the structural interpretation.
that of the migmatite and in some places offshoots of the granodiorite are conformable with the migmatite's foliation indicating
that the pluton was emplaced during the last migmatization event.
The Stios Novos granite (#15 in Fig. 2) is a pink, ne-to medium
grained granite with equigranular texture. The granite is composed
of quartz, plagioclase, K-feldspar and biotite. At mesoscopic scale
this granite does not show deformation, but presents microstructure representative of solid-state deformation such as undulose
extinction of quartz and biotite, and quartz recrystallization by
boundary migration. A few mac enclaves occurs occasionaly

(Fig. 5B). The contact with the Queimada Grande granodiorite is
sharp.
The Poo Redondo granite (#17 in Fig. 2) is dominantly grey,
ne-to medium grained, with equigranular texture; it is composed
of quartz, plagioclase, K-feldspar, muscovite, and minor biotite. Like
the Sitios Novos granite, the Poo Redondo granite does not show
macroscopic deformation structures but presents microstructures
shear
indicative of solid-state deformation; however the Macurure
and Caninde
domains. A) Queimada Grande Granodiorite with numerous mac enclaves; B) isotropic Sitios Novos granite
Fig. 5. Field aspects of granites in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
showing a few mac enclaves; C) Poo Redondo granite with off-shoots into the host migmatites (dark grey); D) Lajedinho monzodiorite showing oriented mac enclaves.
262
zone at north deformed it. The contact between the Poo Redondo
granite and the migmatites is intrusive (Fig. 5C), and in several
places the granite contains migmatite xenoliths.
3.3. Granite in the Canind
e domain

The Lajedinho monzodiorite (#18 in Fig. 2) in the Caninde
domain is also representative of the 630e618 Ma granite age group.
It was emplaced into metadiorite and amphibolites of the Gentileza
unit with zircon UePb age of ca. 688 Ma (Oliveira et al., 2010). The
monzodiorite entrains elongated mac enclaves (Fig. 5D) and is
composed of hornblende, plagioclase, quartz, and minor K-felsdpar,
apatite and zircon.
4. UePb SHRIMP zircon dating
Here we present new UePb ages for three granite plutons from
domain and one from the Caninde

the Poo Redondo-Maranco
~o S
domain. These granites along whith the 625 Ma-old Coronel Joa
a
granodiorite (Long et al., 2005) and the 628 Ma-old Camar
a tonalite
(Bueno et al., 2009) make up the 630e618 Ma granite age group in
the Sergipano Belt. The geographic coordinates of each dated
sample are given in Fig. 6.
Zircons were dated with the Sensitive High Resolution Ion
Microprobe using the Perth Consortium SHRIMP II at the Curtin
University of Technology, Western Australia, based on the operation
procedure described by Compston et al. (1984) and operation
conditions described by Smith et al. (1998). After separation with
conventional gravimetry and magnetic techniques, the zircon
grains were mounted in epoxy resin along with ships of BR266
zircon standard (U 550 ppm; 206Pb/238U 0.0914), and polished
to half of mean grain thickness for further imaging. After optical
observations selected grains were imaged on the Scanning Electron

Microscope (SEM) for qualitatively analysis of morphology and
internal structure. The UePb SHRIMP analysis followed the operational procedures described by Compston et al. (1984) with cycles
of 7-scan for granite, incident O2- ray of 2 nA and mass resolution of
5000 ca. The data were reduced using the SQUID software (Ludwig,
1999a) and ISOPLOT (Ludwig, 1999b). The ages reported here are for
206
Pb/238U with between 95% and 105% concordance. Pooled ages
are quoted with 95% condence level errors. The age uncertainties
in relation to the concordia intercept are around 1s.
Zircon grains from the Stios Novos granite gave the age of
631 4 Ma; those from the Poo Redondo granite the age of
623 7 Ma, those from the Queimada Grande granodiorite the age
of 618 4 Ma, and the Lajedinho monzodiorite the age of
619 3 Ma (Table A1, Fig. 6). The Poo Redondo and Sitios Novos
granites contain numerous Early Neoproterozoic inherited zircon
grains (Table A1).
5. Major- and trace-element geochemistry
Geochemical data were acquired for 82 samples from 18 gran, Poo Redondo-Maranco
, and Caninde
doites in the Macurure
mains. The samples are from random localities in each pluton
(Fig. 2).
Major elements were analyzed on fusion beads and trace elements on pressed powder pellets using a Philips PW-2404 X-ray
spectrometer at the Geochemistry Laboratory of Campinas University. The fusion beads were made with a mixture of lithium
metaborate and tetraborate (80/20 p/p e Spectroux 100B Jonhson
Mattey/USA) in the 5:1 proportion (melter/sample) in a Fluxy 300
melting equipment. The powder pellets were prepared by mixing
9 g of the sample with 1.5 g of wax and pressed in a hydraulic press.
and Caninde
domains: A. Stios Novos granite (sample JUD-96 e W37.62 ; S9.92 ); B. Poo Redondo granite
Fig. 6. Concordia diagrams for granites in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
(sample CRN-11 e W37.69 ; S9.80 ); C. Queimada Grande granodiorite (sample JUD-91 e W37.66 ; S9.96 ); D. Lajedinho monzodiorite (sample CRN-109B e W37.79 ; S9.63 ).
Table A1 show all analyzed grains.
The quality control has been done by comparison with international standard samples AC-E, WS-E and RGM-1, and quadruplicating of two studied samples. The precision is 0.1% for SiO2 and
Al2O3, 0.01% for the other major elements and less than 2 ppm for
the trace elements. The data for La, Ce, Nd and U are only indicative.
Representative whole-rock analyses are given in Table A2. Additional rare earth elements and other trace elements of selected
samples were analysed on a Thermo (Xseries2) quadrupole ICP-MS
following the in-house adapted analytical procedures of Eggins
et al. (1997) and Liang et al. (2000), and instrument conditions of
Cotta and Enzweiler (2009); the results have less than a 10% deviation from the recommended values for the international standards BRP-1, RGM-1 and GSP-2.
Fig. 7 shows the chemical classication of Debon and Le Fort
(1983) for the studied granitoids. Most granitoids of the
590e570 Ma age group are relatively homogeneous in composition
varying from granodiorite to granite, with only two samples plotting in the syenite or quartz-syenite elds. On the other hand,
granitoids of the older age group show larger compositional vari domain is
ation. For instance, the Lajedinho pluton of the Caninde
composed dominantly of quartz-monzodiorite, whereas the Quei domain
mada Grande granitoid of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
varies from quartz-monzodiorite through quartz-monzonite and
granodiorite to monzogranite (adamellite). Similarly, the Sitios
Novos and Poo Redondo granitoids show signicant variation and
are represented by granodiorite to granite. On the other hand, the
and Coronel Joa
~o Sa
plutons are more homogenous, with
Camara
granodiorite composition.
Other chemical characteristics of the Sergipano Belt granitoids
are shown in Fig. 8. In the Al2O3/(Na2O K2O) molar vs. Al2O3/
(CaO Na2O K2O) molar diagram (Fig. 8A) most 630e618 Ma
granitoids are metaluminous with some samples of the Poo
domain
Redondo granite and also some from the Macurure
showing a tendency to peraluminous. The 590e570 Ma granites of
domain straddle the elds of metaluminous to perthe Macurure
aluminous granites. Considering 1.1 as a limit between I- and S-type
granites, the older granite group is composed mainly of I-type
granites (Fig. 8A) and the younger group of I-type with a few
samples of the S-type; in this gure the Poo Redondo pluton
shares similar geochemical characteristics with the 590e570 Ma
granites. The majority of samples are high-K calc-alkaline granites
(Fig. 8B) with only one sample of the Sitios Novos pluton plotting in
the shoshonite eld (Fig. 8B). Most 630e618 Ma granitoids are
magnesian; the exceptions are the Lajedinho and Poo Redondo
263
plutons that show iron enrichment (Fig. 8C). In this diagram, the
590e570 Ma granite group spreads over the ferroan and magnesian
elds (Fig. 8C). The CaO, Na2O and K2O relationships (Frost et al.,
2001) for the studied granitoids indicate that the 590e570 Ma
granite group is mainly alkali-calcic to alkalic, whereas the older
granite group is calc-alkalic to alkali-calcic (Fig. 8D).
The most relevant trace element characteristics of the Sergipano
Belt granites are illustrated in Figs. 9 and 10. Fig 9 shows the
primitive mantle-normalized multi-element diagrams (spidergram) for representative samples of each granite group, along with
averages for oceanic and continental arcs. As shown in Fig. 9A, the
630e618 Ma granite group has little similarities with felsic rocks
from oceanic arcs, at least for the elements Sr to Th; the group has
trace element signature very much like the felsic rocks of continental arcs. On the other hand, representatives of the younger,
590e570 Ma granite group are more scattered in the diagram and
their patterns are not similar to either the oceanic or continental
arc felsic rocks. This is particularly true for the very right end of the
diagram where the elements Gd to Yb show low abundances and
steep patterns. These characteristics can be more clearly seen in
Fig. 10, a plot of Y vs. Sr and (Gd/Yb)n vs. (La/Yb)n. As shown, the
younger granite group has considerably lower Y values, and higher
(Gd/Yb)n and (La/Yb)n ratios than the older granite group, a feature
that may be associated with garnet left in the residue during
granitic magma production by partial melting of a garnet-rich
micaschists.
source, such as the garnet-bearing Macurure
In the tectonic setting discrimination diagram of Pearce et al.
(1984) samples of the older granite group plot in the eld of arc
granites with a few samples of the Sitios Novos granite plotting also
in the syn-collision eld; all the Lajedinho monzodiorite samples
plot in the within-plate eld (Fig. 11A). Similar behaviour is
observed for samples of the younger granite group but in this case a
greater number of samples plot in the syn-collision granite eld
(Fig. 11B).
6. Nd and Sr isotope geochemistry
Sr and Nd isotope analyses were performed in the Geochronology Laboratory of the University of Braslia following the techniques of Gioia and Pimentel (2000). Approximately 60 mg of
powdered rock samples were dissolved for Sr, Sm, and Nd extraction in successive acid attacks with concentrated HF, HNO3, and
HCl. A mixed 149Sme150Nd spike was added to the solution before
the rst acid attack. Sr and the REE group were separated from the
Fig. 7. Chemical-mineralogical classication of the two granites age groups of the Sergipano Belt. A) 630e618 Ma plutons; B) 590e570 Ma plutons. Q quartz, P plagioclase.
Fields after Debon and Le Fort (1983).
264
Fig. 8. Geochemical characteristics of granites from the Sergipano Belt. A) Al2O3/(Na2O K2O) molar vs. Al2O3/(CaO Na2O K2O) molar diagram (modied by Maniar and Piccoli,
1989), dashed line represents the boundary between I- and S-type granites (Chappell and White, 1992); B) SiO2eK2O diagram with nomenclature after Le Maitre et al. (1989) in
italics, and Rickwood (1989) in parentheses; C) SiO2 vs FeOt/(FeOt MgO) diagram (Frost et al., 2001); D) SiO2 vs Na2O K2OeCaO diagram (Frost et al., 2001). Symbols as in Fig. 7.
whole-rock solutions using a conventional ion exchange. Subsequently, Sm and Nd were extracted by reverse-phase chromatography in columns packed with HDEHP (diethylhexyl phosphoric
acid) supported on PTFE powder. Sr, Sm, and Nd aliquots were
loaded onto double Re evaporation laments, and the isotopic
measurements were carried out on a multicollector Finnigan MAT262 mass spectrometer in static mode. Mass fractionation corrections were made using a 88Sr/86Sr ratio value of 8.3752. 1s uncertainty on the measured 87Sr/86Sr ratio was better than 0.01%. For
Sm/Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios, the uncertainties are better than
0.1% (2s) and 0.003% (2s), respectively, after repeated analyses of
international rock standards BCR-1 and BHVO-1. The 143Nd/144Nd
ratios were normalized to a 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.7219. Nd and Sr
procedure blanks were less than 150 and 300 pg, respectively. The
TDM values were calculated using the model of DePaolo (1981).
Sr and Nd isotopic analyses were carried out for 35 samples from
and Poo Redondo-Maranco
rocks (Tables A3 and
the Macurure
A4). Initial Nd and 87Sr/86Sr ratios for 630e618 Ma granites and
Poo Redondo migmatite were calculated to 625 Ma, whereas
initial Nd and 87Sr/86Sr values for 590e570 Ma granites and Mac schists the age of 580 Ma was chosen on the basis of the UePb
urure
zircon and titanite ages.
domain, the Camara
tonalite is one of the
In the Macurure
630e618 Ma granites and has a (87Sr/86Sr)i ratio of 0.70916, Nd(t) of
-7.45 and TDM of 1.71 Ga (Tables A3 and A4, Fig. 12A). The other
~o Sa
granodiorite that
630e618 Ma granite group is the Coronel Joa
has been previously studied by Silva Filho et al. (1997), McReath
et al. (1998) and Long et al. (2005). These authors obtained
~o Sa
granodiorite ranging from
(87Sr/86Sr)i ratios for the Coronel Joa
0.7123 to 0.7167, Nd(t) values of -4.8 to -6.9 (Fig. 12A), and TDM

from 1.50 to 1.70 Ga. The 590e570 Ma granites in the Macurure
domain show a large range in (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (0.70782 to
0.71219) and Nd(t) values (-1.63 to -11.79) (Fig. 12A), but present a
micasrange in TDM, varying from 1.22 to 1.86 Ga. The Macurure
chists show a very large range in (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios from 0.70515 to
0.76379, Nd(t) ranging from -1.89 to -7.49 (Fig. 12B), and TDM
ranging from 1.37 to 1.78 Ga.

The 630e618 Ma granite group in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
domain gave the following results (Fig. 12A): (i) Queimada Grande
granodiorite: (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios ranging from 0.70656 to 0.70789,
Nd(t) slightly negative ranging from -1.15 to -2.55 and TDM varying
of 1.18 to 1.32 Ga; (ii) Stios Novos granite: (87Sr/86Sr)i
ratio 0.71164, Nd(t) -5.47 and TDM 1.51 Ga and (iii) Poo
Redondo granite: (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios ranging from 0.71353 to
0.71417, Nd(t) ranging from -4.23 to -5.50 and TDM varying of 1.40
to 1.57 Ga. Two analyses were obtained for the Poo Redondo
migmatites and the data are: (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (0.71066e0.71832),
Nd(t) values (-1.47 to -5.65) and TDM 1.48 Ga.
The Lajedinho monzodiorite is a representative of the 630e618
domain; its Nd isotope analyses
Ma granites in the Caninde
(Table A3) are from Nascimento (2005). Initial Nd values for Lajedinho monzodiorite were calculated to 625 Ma. This granite has
Nd(t) values ranging from -1.10 to -0.08 and TDM from 1.14 to 1.22
Ga (Table A3).
7. Discussion
7.1. Sources for the 630e618 Ma granites in the Sergipano belt
domain
7.1.1. 630e618 Ma granites in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
The oldest recognized Neoproterozoic granites of the Poo
domain are the Stios Novos (631 4 Ma) and
Redondo-Maranco
the Poo Redondo granites (623 7 Ma). The Stios Novos is a highK calc-alkaline to alkaline granite, metaluminous, magnesian, with
265
Fig. 9. Primitive mantle normalized multi-element diagram of representative samples of the two granite age groups. Normalizing values from Sun and McDonough (1989).
ner (2013).
Continental and oceanic arcs after Condie and Kro
87
Sr/86Sr(i) ratio of 0.71163, Nd(t) of -5.47, and with depleted

mantle Nd model age (TDM) of 1.51 Ga. Poo Redondo granite is a
high-K calc-alkaline to alkali-calcic granite, peraluminous, ferroan,
with 87Sr/86Sr(i) ratio ranging from 0.71352 to 0.71417, Nd(t) from
-4.23 to -5.50, and TDM varying from 1.40 to 1.57 Ga. In the tectonic
setting discrimination diagram (Pearce, 1996), the Poco Redondo
granite falls in the arc eld and the Sitios Novos in both the arc and
syn-collision elds (Fig. 11A). Given that the Poo Redondo and
Sitios Novos granites contain several early Neoproterozic inherited
zircons, potential sources for their parental magmas are the ca.
980e960 Ma Poo Redondo migmatites (Oliveira et al., 2010) and
and Macurure
metasediments (with ca 900e1000 Ma
the Maranco
detrital zircons; Carvalho, 2005).
In the Nd isotope evolution diagram (Fig. 13A), the data for the

granites plot in the elds of Poo-Redondo migmatite, Maranco
micaschists, and Pernambuco-Alagoas
metasediments, Macurure
Massif rocks. On the Nd(625) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i diagram
(Fig. 13B), data for Stios Novos granite plot in the eld of the Poo
Redondo migmatite samples. Similar conclusion holds for the Poo
Redondo granite, which plot partially in the same eld and in the
micaschist eld. Based on the very close crystallization
Macurure
ages of the two granites (631 4 Ma and 623 7 Ma), their similar
high-K calc-alkaline, continental arc geochemical signatures,
intrusion into migmatites, and Nd-Sr isotope characteristics akin to
the Poo Redondo migmatites, we suggest that partial melting of a
source similar to the Poo Redondo migmatites was the most likely
Fig. 10. Trace element characteristics of the granites from the Sergipano Belt. A) SreY diagram showing the higher Y abundances of the 630e618 Ma granite group than the
590e570 Ma granite group (X-ray uorescence data); B) Chondrite-normalized (Evensen et al., 1978) Gd/Yb-La/Yb diagram for the two granite age groups showing the distinctive
high ratios of the younger group (ICP-MS data).
266
petrogenetic model for genesis of Poo Redondo and Stios Novos

granites. According to Oliveira et al. (2010), the 980e960 Ma-old
domain are
migmatite paleosomes of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
calc-alkaline to calcic and have positive to slightly negative Nd(t)
values suggesting similarity with continental arc granites; the Poo
Redondo and Stios Novos granites may have inherited their arclike major and trace element geochemical signature from their
possible source, i.e. the Poo Redondo migmatites.
The Queimada Grande granodiorite is another pluton in the
domain (Fig. 2). Rocks from this pluton
Poo Redondo-Maranco
present less radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr(i) ratios in the range 0.70656 to
0.70789, Nd(625) slightly negative (-1.15 to -2.55), and TDM varying
from 1.18 to 1.32 Ga (Tables A3 and A4, Figs. 10 and 11). The
calculated Nd(625) for the Queimada Grande granodiorite is

amongst the most juvenile so far found in granites of the Macurure
domains, suggesting contribution
from a juvenile source in its genesis. In the Nd(t) evolution diagram

(Fig. 13A), the data for the granodiorite plot in the elds of Maranco
metasediments, Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif, and partially in the
micaschists and Poo-Redondo migmatite. In the
eld of Macurure
Nd(625) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i diagram (Fig. 11B), samples of the
Queimada Grande granodiorite are very distinct of the other
domain, suggesting limited,
granites in the Poo-Redondo Maranco
or no contribution from the Poo-Redondo migmatite to its genesis.
The Queimada Grande granodiorite shows trace element abundances characteristic of volcanic arc granitoids such as depletion in
Nb and Ti relative to Rb, Ba and K (Fig. 9). Enrichment of these elements is generally assigned to uids from subducted sediments or
subducted ocean crust (Briqueu et al., 1984; Pearce et al., 1984;
Pearce, 1996). In the diagram proposed by Pearce (1996) the granodiorite plots in the volcanic arc eld (Fig. 11A). This pluton shows
characteristics of I-type granite such as mol Al2O3/
(CaO Na2O K2O) < 1.1 (Fig. 6A). The granodiorite shows
numerous aligned mac xenoliths that are evidence of magma
mixing and mingling. The combined eld relations, major- and traceelements, and Nd-Sr isotopic data suggest that the Queimada Grande
granodiorite has a strong subduction signature, having been formed
possibly in a continental arc by magma mixing between a mantlederived mac crustal source that has previously experienced subduction zone element depletion and a crustal component that could
and Macurure
metassediments, as
be represented by the Maranco
well as Pernambuco-Alagoas rocks (Figs. 16A, B).
7.1.2. 630e618 Ma granites in the Macurur

e domain
domain is
The 630e618 Ma granite group in the Macurure
granodiorite and Coronel Jo~

represented by the Camara
ao Sa
granodiorite (Fig. 2). These granitoids are deformed in different
domain.
scales by the tectonic events that affected the Macurure
The two plutons have similar UePb zircon ages, i.e. 628 12 Ma for
granodiorite (Bueno et al., 2009) and 625 2 Ma for the
the Camara
~o Sa
granodiorite (Long et al., 2005).
Coronel Joa
Long et al. (2005) commented on the petrogenesis of the Coronel
~o Sa
~o granodiorite. On the basis of eld relationships and Sr and
Joa
Nd isotope these authors suggested that the granodiorite originated
by partial melting of a basaltic lower crust, represented by
amphibolite xenoliths entrained in the granodiorite, and an unknown crustal source represented by zircons with inherited cores.
These authors proposed that the likely source candidates of appropriate age and Sm-Nd isotope characteristics could be the Archaean/
~o Francisco craton and early Neoproterozoic
Palaeoproterozoic Sa
(Cariris Velhos) material. Long et al. (2005) discussed that the data
available in their study were not sufcient to draw quantitative
conclusions about magma sources. As a qualitative conclusion the
authors proposed that the granodiorite magma was the product of
partial melting of local heterogeneous crustal sources.
The plot of Nd(625) versus crystallization age shows that the
~o Sa
granodiorite fall in the
data of Long et al. (2005) for Coronel Joa
metasediments,
elds of the Poo Redondo migmatite, Maranco
micaschists and Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif rocks
Macurure
(Fig. 13C). In the Nd(625) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i diagram (Fig. 13D), the
~o S
samples of the Coronel Joa
a granodiorite plot partially in the
micaschists. Representatives of Cariris Velhos
eld of Macurure
rocks in the Sergipano belt, the Poo Redondo migmatite, are also
shown in the Nd(625) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i diagram in order to test for
~o Sa
granodiorite magma.
its likelihood as source for the Coronel Joa
Accordingly, this suggest that the Poo Redondo migmatites do not
appear to have contributed with material to magma source of the
granodiorite as proposed by Long et al. (2005).

Another example of 630e618 Ma granitoids in the Macurure
domain is the Camar
a tonalite (Fig. 2). This pluton also contains
~o Sa

amphibolite xenoliths (Fig. 3A) but unlike the Coronel Joa
micashists
granodiorite it entrains xenoliths of deformed Macurure
(Fig. 3B). The Camar
a tonalite has (87Sr/86Sr)i ratio of 0.70916, Nd(t)
of -7.45 and TDM of 1.71 Ga (Tables A3 and A4, Fig. 12A). In the Nd
evolution diagram (Fig. 13C), the tonalite plot into the elds for
Fig. 11. Trace element tectonic setting discrimination diagram for granites of the Sergipano Belt (Pearce et al., 1984). A) 630e618 Ma granites; B) 590e570 Ma granites.
267

domains. A) Plot of Poo Redondo migmatite and 630e618 Ma granitoids:
Fig. 12. Neodimium and Strontium isotope diagrams for rocks of Macurure
~o S a
granodiorite. Data for Coronel Joa
~o S a
granite are from Long et al.
Queimada Grande granodiorite, Stios Novos granite, Poo Redondo granite, Camara tonalite, and Coronel Joa
micaschists.
(2005); B) Plot of 590e570 Ma granites and Macurure
metasediments, Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif and partially

Maranco
micaschists. In the Nd(625) versus
in the eld of Macurure
(87Sr/86Sr)i diagram (Fig. 13D), the tonalite plots below the eld for
micaschists.
the Macurure
tonalite shows isotope and geochemical characThe Camara
~o Sa
granodiorite. Both
teristics very similar to the Coronel Joa
granitoids were emplaced pre-to early-D2 (Bueno et al., 2009) into
micaschists, have mac enclaves and similar crystalliMacurure
zation age. As such, they may have had similar petrogenetic evolution, especially regarding the sources of melting. According to
Long et al. (2005) simple fractional crystallization is not appli~o Sa

granodiorite, because
cable in the petrogenesis of Coronel Joa
this process cannot account for the range of variation in initial Sr
and Nd isotopic compositions. Our data together with the data
obtained by Long et al. (2005) suggest that the source for both
~o Sa
granodiorite and Camara
tonalite may be a mixture
Coronel Joa
between at least two end-members represented by basaltic lower
crust (amphibolite enclaves) and an upper continental crust
component. The magma must have been contaminated with the
micaschists because the granites show many zircon
Macurure
Fig. 13. Sr-Nd isotope characteristics of 630e618 Ma granitoids in the Sergipano Belt. A) Evolution of Nd(625) with time for the Queimada Grande granodiorite, Poo Redondo
metasediments are from Carvalho (2005). Data for
granite and Stios Novos granite and their possible source components. Data for Poo Redondo migmatites and Maranco
domain and their possible source
Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif (PEAL) are from Silva Filho et al. (2002); B) Nd(t) vs (87Sr/86Sr)i plot for granites in the Poo Redondo-Maranco
granodiorite, and their possible source components. Data for Coronel Jo~ao Sa
granodiorite, Coronel Joa
~o
components; C) evolution of Nd for the Camara tonalite and Coronel Jo~ao Sa
~o Sa
amphibolite xenolith are from Long et al. (2005); D) Nd(t) vs (87Sr/86Sr)i plot for the 630e620 Ma granites in the Macurure
domain and their
S
a tonalitic enclave and Coronel Joa
possible source components.
268
Fig. 14. Sr-Nd isotope characteristics of 590e570 Ma granitoids in the Sergipano Belt. A) Evolution of Nd(580) for the granites and their possible source components. Data for Poo
metassediments are from Carvalho (2005). Data for Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif (PEAL) are from Silva Filho et al. (2002); B) Nd(t) vs (87Sr/86Sr)i
Redondo migmatites and Maranco
micaschists.
for the granites and Macurure
grains with inherited core, and this contamination may have been
tonalite because it shows more negamore intense in the Camara
tive Nd(625) values (and micaschist xenoliths) than the Coronel
~o S
Joa
a granodiorite.
7.2. Source(s) for the 590e570 Ma granites in the Macurur
e
domain
Our Sm-Nd and RbeSr isotope data provide insights into
granites.
possible magma sources for the 590e570 Ma Macurure
The granites Nd(580 Ma) variation from -1.63 to -11.79 (Fig. 14) is
micaschists, Maranco
metasediobserved also in the Macurure
ments, Poo Redondo migmatites, and in rocks of the PernambucoAlagoas Massif (PEAL) (Fig. 14A); these rock units can be potential
granites. The majority of the
melting sources for the Macurure
Nd(t) values shown by the 590e570 Ma granites are in the range
schists (Table A3 Fig 14), suggesting that the
found for the Macurure
micaschists were sources for granite magma or, alterMacurure
natively, that the micaschists may have contributed material to the
bulk geochemistry. There is only one exception observed in
samples of the Formosa granite that presents one Nd(t) value of

-4.39 and another of -11.79. Fig. 14B shows a plot of Nd(t) vs
syn-collisional granites and associated
(87Sr/86Sr)i for the Macurure
micaschists. The majority of granites plot into the eld represented
by the micaschists, suggesting that they might have been partial
melts of the latter. Another piece of evidence that supports this
hypothesis is the granites TDM ages in the range 1.26-1.78 Ga

(Table A3), which are very similar to TDM values for Macurure
micaschists, from 1.36 to 1.76 Ga. The more negative Nd(t) value
(-11.16) of the Formosa granite, which plots well below the eld for
micaschists in Fig. 14B, can be explained by source mixMacurure
~o
ing, or contamination with less radiogenic crust such as the Sa
Francisco craton, which is likely to have imbricated in depth
metasedimentary domain according to the
beneath the Macurure
evolution model of Oliveira et al. (2010) for the Sergipano Belt.
In order to test the hypothesis of source mixing in genesis of the
590e570 Ma granites, we performed quantitative modelling using

a simple mixture equation for Nd and Nd(t) data with the Macurure
~o Francisco Craton as end-members.
micaschists and rocks of the Sa

The obtained results (Fig. 15A) match very well with the Macurure
Fig. 15. Geochemical modelling for the 590e570 Ma syn-collisional granite group. A) Nd(580) vs Nd source mixing for the 590e570 Ma granite group represented as black ellipses.
micaschists and S~ao Francisco Craton rocks. A and B represents samples of Macurure
micaschist and S~ao Francisco Craton, respectively, used
The grey rectangles represent Macurure
as end-members of compositional modelling. The ornamented square represents the calculated composition for a mixture between the two end-members in a 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and
100% of each component. Note that the majority of samples for the 590e570 Ma granites plot in between the two compositional calculated lines for mixture and mostly in the
micaschists eld. B) Nd(580) vs Nd for the 590e570 Ma granites plotted as individual plutons. The arrow indicates the theoretical trend of quartz, K-feldspar, and
Macurure
plagioclase fractionation in granititc magmas.
269
and Macurure
granites and their possible source components. Data for Maranco
metassediments are from
Fig. 16. A) Evolution of Nd(625) vs TDM for the Poo Redondo-Maranco
schists and Coronel Joa
~o Sa granodiorite are respectively from Oliveira et al. (2010) and Long et al. (2005); depleted mantle from DePaolo (1981); B) Nd(t)
Carvalho (2005), Macurure
domain through the Poo Redondo-Maranco
domain to the Macurure
domain.
vs. geographic location (from North to South) of the possible arc-type granites from the Caninde
micaschists as the major component in genesis of the syncollisional granites. The majority of 590e570 Ma granites plot in
the micaschists eld and in between the two compositional
micaschists
calculated lines for the mixture between the Macurure
~o Francisco Craton rocks. In Fig. 15B, the possibility of
and the Sa
fractional crystallization as a major process in genesis of the
granites is less likely because this process cannot account for the
observed large variation of Nd(t) values. Fractional crystallization
may have been signicant only in the Monte Alegre and Areias
granites.
domain is a typical sedimentary domain of the
The Macurure
Sergipano belt bound by two regional-scale shear zones, namely the
~o Miguel do Aleixo to
Belo Monte-Jeremoabo to the north and the Sa
the south (Fig. 2). This domain has undergone a substantial crustal
compression during the main deformation event D2 that probably
facilitated high degrees of partial melting of the metasedimentary
pile to form the parental magmas of the 590e570 Ma granites. In the
domain the michaschists show
easternmost part of the Macurure
migmatization features such as quartz-feldspar segregation. The
contact between the 590e570 Ma granites and the micaschists are
knife sharp, and intrusion of the granite barely caused contact
metamorphism in the metasediments (Santos et al., 1988). These
granites occasionally contain large rafts of metasedimentary rocks
(Fig. 4C), apparently split apart during granite intrusion.
According to Bueno et al. (2009), eld observations support the
suggestion that the granitic magmas migrated/crystallized along
the S2 axial plane foliation and were collected at the hinge zones of
F2 folds. In this scenario, the axial plane foliation probably acted as a
channel for magma migration and collection to form large-scale
batholiths. The space necessary for granite emplacement along
the country rock's axial plane foliation may have been generated by
hydraulic fracturing in a scenario similar to that suggested for
leucogranites in the Himalayas (Searle et al., 2003).
The 590e570 Ma granites show characteristics of I-type granites
(Fig. 8B, D), such as decrease of P2O5 with increasing SiO2, positive
correlation between Pb and SiO2, Al2O3/(CaO Na2O K2O) < 1.1
and titanite. According to the original characteristics of S-type
granites (Chappell and White, 1974, 2001) these features conict
with derivation of the 590e570 Ma granites by partial melting of
micaschists. However, the S-type characteristics were
the Macurure
dened in granites originated by melting of pelites of the Lachlan
Sequence is more Ca-rich and melting of it

Fold Belt. The Macurure
can generate magmas with geochemical signatures similar to those
recorded in the 590e570 Ma granites.
Oliveira et al. (2005) have obtained UePb SHRIMP detrital zircon
domain quartzite and micaschist. The main
data for Macurure
cluster of zircon ages is around 980 Ma with some zircon grains
showing Archaean ages (2.8 Ga and 3.1 Ga). According to these
metasediments resulted
authors the protoliths of the Macurure
dominantly from erosion of sources with ages between 1.0 and 2.0
Ga, with a few grains coming from Archaean sources. More significantly, no zircon grain younger than 900 Ma was observed, which
sediments
indicate a maximum deposition age for the Macurure
well before the Neoproterozoic Brasiliano orogeny, possibly shortly
after the ca. 1.0 Ga Cariris Velhos orogeny (Brito Neves et al., 1995;
Santos et al., 2010; Van Schmus et al., 2011). This afrmative is
conrmed by the Sm-Nd isotope data of Oliveira et al. (2005) that
indicate Nd model ages (TDM) for metasediments varying from 1.2
to 1.8 Ga. These TDM are very similar to those found for the Poo
domain and Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif rocks.
Redondo-Maranco
According to detrital zircon ages and the TDM, the protoliths of
domain clastic metasediments may have originated by
Macurure
domain and the
erosion of rocks from the Poo Redondo-Maranco
Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif.
Domain comprises metasediThe Poo Redondo-Maranco
mentary rocks, volcanic and plutonic rocks within migmatitic
basement (Santos et al., 1988; Carvalho, 2005). The PernambucoAlagoas Massif is composed mostly of orthogneisses and granites

in its southern part (Silva Filho et al., 2002). If the Macurure

micaschists resulted from erosion of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
Domain and the Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif, they will have
geochemical characteristics similar to the source rocks. Following
micaschists have undergone high
this reasoning, if the Macurure
degrees of partial melting to form the 590e570 Ma granites parental
magmas, then these granites will have isotope geochemistry very
close to that of the micaschists. This was demonstrated in Fig. 14B.
Crawford and Searle (1993) proposed that the collision-related
leucogranites in North Pakistan are partial melts of biotite-rich
sedimentary protoliths, even though the granites do not show
Rb/Sr isotopic characteristics compatible with derivation from
crustal protoliths. These authors concluded that the sediments
were immature and leucogranites have inherited their isotopic
270
characteristics. In our case, the 590e570 Ma granites show

geochemical and isotopic characteristics of the likely source rocks,
micaschists, and lesser of the Poo
particularly the Macurure
domain and the Pernambuco-Alagoas massif.
Redondo-Maranco
For many geologists it is a consensus that the geochemical
composition of granites depends on the sources and crystallization
rster et al., 1997; Barbarin,
history of the melt (Pearce, 1996; Fo
1999; Frost et al., 2001; Clemens, 2003; Sun et al., 2010). For this
reason it is too difcult to consider classication schemes that can
enclose all types of granites present in the crust. Chappell and
White (1974) proposed the I- and S-type classication on the basis of observations made in low-temperature granites, in southeastern Australia. There the granites show isotopic evidence
demanding contrasting source reservoirs for S- and I-type granitic
magmas. For some reasons, granites of the Lachlan Fold Belt preserve these differences, whereas in some other regions granite typology can be somewhat less distinct. Crawford and Searle (1993)
reported on collision granitoids in North Pakistan with composition
varying from biotite-bearing aplitic granodiorites and monzogranites through two-mica granites to pegmatitic, garnetmuscovite leucogranites. This means that in the Himalayas there
are collisional granites that resulted from partial melting of metasedimentary rocks that do not show the common S-type characteristics. In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that
590e570 Ma granites are product of high degrees of partial melting
micaschists but they cannot be classied strictly as
of the Macurure
S-type granites because they do not show the typical features of
this granite type.
7.3. Tectonic implications

7.3.1. Hot asthenosphere upwelling by ~630e618 Ma?
Sr-Nd isotope ratios, UePb crystallization ages, and major and
trace elements data indicate that the Stios Novos and Poo
Redondo granites could have originated by partial melting of local
domain migmatites, and that the Lajedinho
Poo Redondo-Maranco
and Queimada Grande granitoids require contribution from more
juvenile sources.
Oliveira et al. (2010) proposed that rifting/extension in the
domain, which is the domain immediately north of the
Caninde
domain, was intermittent from ca. 715 Ma
Poo Redondo-Maranco
with emplacement/extrusion of bimodal magmas of the Garrote
and Novo Gosto unit until approximately 640 Ma when intrusion of
the A-type Boa Esperana rapakivi granite took place. According to
the model put forward by these authors, compression in the Can and Macurure
domains was more intense when the S~
inde
ao
Francisco craton (plate) began to underthrust the Pernambuco shear zone that limits the
Alagoas massif, forming the Macurure
domains, and probably
Caninde
marking the onset of D1 and D2 deformations in sedimentary domains of the Sergipano Belt.
~o Francisco craton/
The beginning of collision between the Sa
plate and the Pernambuco-Alagoas massif is unknown but taking
into account that the 630e618 Ma granite age group is possibly arcrelated (see next section), we suggest that the younger granite of
this group (618 Ma) denes a minimum age for the onset of collision. Subduction of the S~
ao Francisco craton/plate might have been
followed by slab break-off or slab tearing, which allows the
asthenosphere to uplift. Uplift of the asthenosphere may have
provided the necessary heat for partial melting of the Poo
Redondo migmatites to originate the Stios Novos and Poo
Redondo granites, and to contribute with mantle material to form
the more juvenile Queimada Grande and Lajedinho granitoids.
7.3.2. 630e618 Ma-old Neoproterozoic arc development in the

Sergipano belt?
The 630e618 Ma-old granitoids of the Sergipano Belt belong to
the high-K calc-alkaline series and some of them entrain mac
enclaves. High-K calc-alkaline granitoids are very common in
orogenic belts (continental arcs), in post-collisional (Caledoniantype) tectonic setting (Bonin, 1990; Roberts and Clemens, 1993;
Wang et al., 2004; Karsli et al., 2007), and in intracontinental
shear zones (Neves and Mariano, 1997; Njanko et al., 2006). The
presence of mac enclaves in the granites implies magma mingling
or capture of pre-existing mac crust by the granitic magma.
Two tectonic scenarios can be envisaged for the origin of the
630e618 Ma high-K calc-alkalic igneous activity in the Sergipano
Belt. One model is based on mantle plume activity, and was proposed by Neves and Mariano (1997) for the origin of high-K calcalkalic plutons in the Borborema Province. The authors suggested
this model to explain the association between mac to intermediate (diorite to granodiorite) and felsic rocks (coarse-grained to
porphyritic quartz monzonites to granites) in the Borborema
Province. These authors concluded that the main petrogenetic
process responsible for origin of these rocks was magma mixing
and that the source for the granitoid magmas was the lower crust
and for the diorites was the metasomatized subcontinental lithospheric mantle. The granitoids studied by Neves and Mariano
(1997) emplaced along major strike-slip shear zones of the Borborema Province. However, according to the authors, granitoid
emplacement was not controlled by a tectonic event because the
scale of magmatism is too large to be assigned to transcurrent
faulting and the increase of temperature promoted by the shear
zones would not be high enough to trigger melting under uidabsent conditions that prevailed in the deep crust. Another argument used by the authors in support of the mantle plume model for
granitoid genesis in the Borborema Province is the absence of
common features found in a tectonic environment related to subduction, such as ophiolites, suture zones, or high-pressure metamorphic rocks in the internal portion of the province.
The other model that we prefer is for origin of the Queimada
Grande and Lajedinho high-K calc-alkaline plutons in a continental
arc. Oliveira et al. (2010) proposed a complete plate tectonic cycle
for the Sergipano belt and had already proposed that arc-type rocks
were generated in the time spam 630e617 Ma for the Poo
and Macurure
domains. Another argument that
Redondo-Maranco
buttress the hypothesis that the Queimada Grande and Lajedinho
plutons formed in a Neoproterozoic arc in the Sergipano belt is the
presence of volcanic rocks with arc geochemical signature in the
domain with UePb SHRIMP zircon ages
Poo Redondo-Maranco
about 603 Ma (Carvalho 2005; Oliveira et al., 2010).
According to Neves and Mariano (1997) in the Borborema
Province there is no evidence of collision tectonics. In the Borborema Province there are granites with similar crystallization ages,
such as the 591 Ma-old Teixeira batholith and the 576 Ma-old Serra
Redonda granite-diorite pluton (Archanjo et al., 2008) all of them
emplaced along regional shear zones. In the Sergipano Belt, the 584
Ma-old Angico granite and 571 Ma-old Pedra Furada granite had
their emplacement controlled by collision (Bueno et al., 2009). The
Teixeira and Serra Redonda granitoids are located in the northern
part of the Borborema province, whereas the Angico and Pedra
Furada granites are located in the southernmost part (Sergipano
Belt). On a regional scale, what geological scenario can account for
the simultaneous emplacement of syn-collision high-K calcalkaline granites in the Sergipano Belt (approximately between
590e570 Ma) and strike-slip-related granitoids (590e520 Ma) in
domains at north in the Borborema Province? Bueno et al. (2009)
suggested that this scenario is possible during continentcontinent collision, such as the Himalayas, when syn-collision
granites formed in the collision zone (e.g. Sergipano Belt) and

strike-slip controlled granites formed in the passive indentor (e.g.
mainland Borborema Province) owing to far eld stress during
coeval extrusion tectonics. Fetter et al. (2003) have recognized a
continental arc in the northwestern portion of the Borborema
ria batholith dated at ca.
Province represented by the Santa Quite
665 and 591 Ma; the arc was formed during collision of the Bor~o Lus craton (Santos et
borema Province with the West African-Sa
al., 2008). All of these evidences support the hypothesis that the
Borborema Province has endured multiple Neoproterozoic collisional events, at least at its margins.
Despite the high-K calc-alkaline granite series being generally
associated with extensional tectonics (Whalen et al., 2004;
~es et al., 2004; Njanko et al., 2006; Karsli et al., 2007), this
Guimara
rock series is the most abundant one in continental arcs, such as the
Andes (Winter, 2001) and in post-collision settings in the AlpineHimalayan belt in Turkey (e.g. Karsli et al., 2007). Silva Filho et al.
(2000) suggested that the high-K calc-alkaline granitoids along
the boundary of Pernambuco-Alagoas massif and the Sergipano belt
could be remnants of an arc during the Brasiliano orogeny. There are
other high-K calc-alkaline granitoids ascribed to the development of
arc-type setting, like the St Peter Suite in Australia (Swain et al.,
2008), I-type high-K calc-alkaline and S-type granitoids from
southeastern Roraima, Brazil (Almeida et al., 2007), the Saghro
Massif in Morocco (El Baghdadil et al., 2003), and the Sierra de
Macon I-type high-K calc-alkaline granitoid in the Argentina, which
shows negative Nd(t) values (Poma et al., 2004). In conclusion, our
integrated eld, geochemistry and isotope data suggest that the
Queimada Grande and Lajedinho monzodiorite plutons belong to a
ca. 618 Ma-old Neoproterozoic magmatic arc in the Poo Redondo and Caninde
domains of the Sergipano belt.
Maranco

We propose that the Camar
a tonalite and the Coronel Jo~
ao Sa
granodiorite represent approximately coeval arc-rocks in the Mac domain. There are many similarities between these granites
urure
and the Queimada Grande granodiorite. All of the granites show
similar crystallization age, between 618 Ma and 628 Ma (Long et al.,
2005; Bueno et al., 2009). From the geochemical point of view, the
granitoids are also similar; they are magnesian, metaluminous, Itype, high-K calc-alkaline granites with trace element signatures of
volcanic arc granites. Additionally, the granitoids show numerous
mac xenoliths of amphibolitic composition. The difference

amongst these granites lies in their Nd(t) values. The Camara
~o Sa
granodiorite show more negative Nd(t)
tonalite and Coronel Joa
values, i.e. -7.45 and -4.83 to -6.86 respectively, when compared
with the Queimada grande Granodiorite (-1.15 to -2.55). This difference can be explained by greater amounts of crustal assimilation
during magma ascent and emplacement in the continental crust.
The probable Neoproterozoic arc granites in the Sergipano belt
show increasing contamination (or interaction) with upper crustal
components from north to south (Fig. 16). The granites TDM values
increase and Nd(t) values generally decrease from north to south in
the belt. The Queimada Grande granodiorite and the Lajedinho
monzodiorite have the least negative Nd(t) values, whereas the
tonalite and some parts of the Coronel Joa
~o Sa
granodiorite
Camara
have the most negative Nd(t) values.
The only possibility for generation of arc-type rocks in the Poo
and in Macurure
domains simultaneously, is that
Redondo-Maranco
domain was connected to the Poo Redondo-Maranco

the Macurure
domain before the beginning of Brasiliano orogeny. Oliveira et al.
(2010) had already proposed this connection based on TDM and
domain quartzite and micaschist.
detrital zircon data for Macurure
domain show Nd model ages (TDM) varying from
Rocks of Macurure
1.2 to 1.8 Ga (Oliveira et al., 2005) and cluster of zircon ages is around
980 Ma indicating these rocks as product of erosion of Cariris Velhos
domain.
sources around 1.0 Ga found in Poo Redondo-Maranco
271
7.3.3. Generation of 590e570 Ma granites within a channel ow?

After generation of a continental arc in the Sergipano belt rep crust started to
resented by ~ 625 Ma-old granitoids, the Macurure
thicken until partial melt took place to originate the ca. 580 Ma-old
collisional granites. During collision of two or more plates there
should be an interval of time between the rst contact of the
colliding blocks and the onset of granitic magmas. This period of
time is required for the crust to be sufciently thickened and its
lowest levels reach the pressure-temperature conditions for
granitic magma generation. For the Himalayas, which is the most
recent example and still active continent-continent collision zone
(Nelson et al., 1996; Klemperer, 2006), the incubation period between the beginning of continental collision and the production of
granites is approximately 25 million years, a number derived from
the initial contact between India and Asia at 57 Ma and the oldest
leucogranite at 32 Ma (Leech et al., 2005). In ancient orogenic belts
the beginning of collision is more difcult to infer. Nevertheless,
et al. (2002) estimated in 60 million years the span of time
Ferre
between collision and S-type granite generation in the Proterozoic
Thans-Sahara belt. In the Sergipano belt, if the ~625 Ma-old granites are taken as the minimum age for onset of the main collisional
event (D2) in the belt and the age of the Angico granite (584 10
Ma) as the rst syn-D2 granites, we then have a minimum time
span of about 41 million years since the beginning of collision and
generation of the rst syn-collisional granite.
It is possible to drawn an analogy between the Himalayas and the
Sergipano Belt because the Sergipano Belt contains several structural and lithologic domains that render it comparable to Phanerozoic orogens. Searle and Szulc (2005) suggested that the High
Himalaya metamorphic sequence operated as a ductile channel ow
approximately 15-20 km thick, extruding southwards, and bound by
major shear zones above and below where the leucogranites were
generated. According to Searle et al. (2003) a mid-crustal layer was at
high temperature, deforming in a ductile manner with a combination of both pure and simple shear, and was partially melted in situ to
produce leucogranite sheets, which migrated horizontally following
the planes of anisotropy dened by the metamorphic foliation.
Field observations are consistent with the interpretation of the
domain as a Neoproterozoic analogous of the ductile
Macurure

channel ow model proposed for the High Himalaya. The Macurure
domain is a metasedimentary domain and is located between shear
~o Miguel do Aleixo, to the south, and the Belo Monte
zones, i.e. the Sa
Jeremoabo, to the north. During collision between the Pernambuco~o Francisco Craton, the Macurure
domain
Alagoas massif and the Sa
was compressed, possibly between two regional shear zones,
thereby generating a great crustal shortening. Partial melting of the
metasedimentary rocks may have taken place during this shortening
event to form in situ granitic magmas. The magma then migrated
along the S2 axial plane foliation towards the region of less tension
and was collect in the hinge of F2 folds. From the structural point of
domain operated as a ductile channel ow
view, the Macurure
bound by two shear zones, between which the metasedimentary
pile was exhumed and eroded, exposing side by side contrasting
lithotectonic domains such as the low-grade metamorphicVaza
domain.
Barris domain and the higher-grade Macurure
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the nancial support of the Brazilian
agencies FAPESP (05/60119-5, 04/05054-2; 02/03085-2; 02/075369), CNPq (308424/2011-5), Millenium Project (42.0222/2005-7), and
rbara Lima and Jeane Chaves are
INCT project (573713/2008-1). Ba
thanked for whole-rock Sm-Nd and Sr laboratory facilities at Uni~es and an
versity of Brasilia. We also thank Ignez de Pinho Guimara
anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments of the manuscript.
272
Appendix A. Data tables
Table A1
, Caninde
, and Macurure
domains.
UePb geochronologic data for granitic rocks of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
Spot
U ppm
Th ppm
Stios Novos granite

15-1*
384
210
4-1
118
44
14-1
295
187
17-1
918
14
5-1
45
36
21-1
344
235
26-1
219
247
3-1
251
139
16-1
526
286
8-1
228
190
12-1
422
381
9-1
120
70
18-1
290
174
25-1
858
108
11-1
46
45
20-1
187
69
19-1
411
189
24-1
457
42
6-1
345
147
2-1
76
35
23-1
188
237
10-1
77
75
7-1*
51
37
1-1*
451
40
22-1*
750
281
Queimada Grande granodiorite
1-1*
107
62
1-2
140
111
2-1@
319
365
2-2
354
245
3-1
400
108
4-1*
450
329
5-1
264
179
5-2*
302
128
6-1
301
229
6-2
203
147
7-1@
212
146
8-1
322
115
9-1
240
164
10-1
313
248
10-2*
324
219
11-1*
229
179
12-1
196
201
13-1
196
168
14-1@
333
64
15-1
91
56
16-1
215
190
17-1
156
163
18-1
253
204
19-1
84
66
20-1
152
114
21-1
245
171
22-1
218
241
Spot
U ppm
Th ppm
232
Th
238
Isotope ratios
207
Pb
206
Pb
Age (Ma)
1s
207
235
Pb
1s
206
238
1s
Pb
206
1s
Pb
Concor
dance%
238
0.56
0.38
0.66
0.02
0.82
0.71
1.17
0.57
0.56
0.86
0.93
0.6
0.62
0.13
1.02
0.38
0.47
0.09
0.44
0.48
1.3
1
0.75
0.09
0.39
0.06
0.2
0.09
0.07
0.21
0.27
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.64
0.4
0.25
0.73
0.26
0.01
0.12
0.24
0.13
0.11
0.59
0.35
0.32
1.3
2.94
1.66
0.1133
0.0842
0.0726
0.0718
0.0706
0.0714
0.0717
0.0726
0.0708
0.0699
0.0712
0.0658
0.0693
0.0611
0.0592
0.0586
0.0591
0.0613
0.0600
0.0578
0.0586
0.0573
0.0508
0.0653
0.0620
0.0012
0.0036
0.0008
0.0006
0.0019
0.0010
0.0009
0.0008
0.0006
0.0015
0.0018
0.0014
0.0016
0.0007
0.0036
0.0022
0.0010
0.0008
0.0008
0.0024
0.0014
0.0017
0.0021
0.0028
0.0047
4.16
2.63
1.66
1.61
1.58
1.59
1.57
1.59
1.51
1.44
1.42
1.28
1.35
0.90
0.86
0.85
0.85
0.87
0.85
0.82
0.82
0.80
0.69
0.83
0.78
0.07
0.12
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.2664
0.2264
0.1664
0.1626
0.1625
0.1612
0.1593
0.1586
0.1543
0.1492
0.1445
0.1415
0.1410
0.1068
0.1056
0.1049
0.1039
0.1031
0.1030
0.1027
0.1022
0.1012
0.0979
0.0927
0.0910
0.0032
0.0023
0.0013
0.0013
0.0023
0.0012
0.0014
0.0012
0.0012
0.0013
0.0011
0.0014
0.0012
0.0007
0.0017
0.0011
0.0008
0.0007
0.0008
0.0014
0.0009
0.0012
0.0014
0.0007
0.0007
1852
1297
1002
981
944
969
978
1002
950
925
964
799
906
654
647
643
637
633
632
630
627
622
602
572
561
19
84
22
18
56
28
27
23
17
43
51
43
47
4
10
6
5
4
5
8
5
7
8
4
4
82
101
99
99
103
99
97
95
97
97
90
107
94
102
113
116
112
98
105
121
114
123
259
73
83
0.60
0.82
1.18
0.71
0.28
0.76
0.70
0.44
0.79
0.75
0.71
0.37
0.71
0.82
0.70
0.81
1.06
0.89
0.20
0.63
0.91
1.08
0.83
0.82
0.78
0.72
1.14
0.62
0.21
0.15
0.08
0.13
1.23
0.18
0.54
0.18
0.00
0.24
0.11
0.24
0.56
0.12
0.18
0.40
0.16
0.13
0.03
0.08
0.29
0.55
0.56
0.16
0.19
0.24
0.0546
0.0616
0.0602
0.0597
0.0594
0.0588
0.0591
0.0576
0.0594
0.0610
0.0695
0.0604
0.0598
0.0597
0.0587
0.0574
0.0578
0.0589
0.0601
0.0591
0.0615
0.0572
0.0581
0.0567
0.0594
0.0583
0.0602
0.0023
0.0018
0.0008
0.0009
0.0009
0.0017
0.0010
0.0011
0.0009
0.0010
0.0012
0.0008
0.0010
0.0014
0.0007
0.0013
0.0015
0.0011
0.0009
0.0018
0.0010
0.0016
0.0016
0.0022
0.0016
0.0010
0.0013
0.75
0.86
0.82
0.84
0.82
0.76
0.82
0.79
0.82
0.86
1.38
0.84
0.82
0.83
0.83
0.79
0.80
0.82
0.86
0.83
0.84
0.80
0.81
0.78
0.84
0.81
0.83
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.0990
0.1016
0.0985
0.1016
0.1002
0.0938
0.1008
0.0999
0.0997
0.1022
0.1442
0.1005
0.0991
0.1005
0.1022
0.1004
0.0998
0.1005
0.1034
0.1021
0.0992
0.1013
0.1016
0.0996
0.1025
0.1002
0.1000
0.0011
0.0010
0.0008
0.0008
0.0007
0.0007
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0009
0.0012
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0009
0.0009
0.0008
0.0012
0.0009
0.0010
0.0009
0.0012
0.0010
0.0008
0.0009
608
624
606
624
616
578
619
614
613
627
914
617
609
617
627
617
613
617
634
627
610
622
624
612
629
615
615
6
6
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
35
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
5
6
5
7
6
5
5
154
95
99
105
106
103
109
119
105
98
95
100
102
104
113
122
117
110
104
110
93
125
117
127
108
113
101
232
238
Poo Redondo granite

04-116B
1B.4-3*
110
47
1B.2-2*
410
84
1B.14-2
146
75
1B.6-1
387
180
% 206
common
Th
U
0.44
0.21
0.53
0.48
% 206
common
0.75
0.02
0.23
0.05
Isotope ratios
207
Pb
206
Pb
0.1422
0.1167
0.0707
0.0723
1s
Age (Ma)
207
235
0.0025
0.0025
0.0019
0.0007
Pb
1s
238
4.33
3.07
1.58
1.61
206
0.09
0.07
0.04
0.02
Pb
1s
238
0.2209
0.1908
0.1624
0.1611
206
0.0024
0.0011
0.0014
0.0009
Pb
1s
1201
1075
971
962
12
7
8
5
207
Pb
206
Pb
2254
1906
949
994
1s
30
38
54
19
Concor
dance %
188
177
98
103
273
Table A1 (continued )
Spot
U ppm
Th ppm
232
Th
238
% 206
common
Isotope ratios
207
Pb
206
Pb
1s
Age (Ma)
207
Pb
1s
235
206
238
Pb
1s
206
238
Pb
1s
207
Pb
206
Pb
1s
Concor
dance %
1B.10-1
1B.2-1
1B.8-2
1B.11-1
1B.11-4
1B.11-2
1B.15-5
1B.11-3*
1B.15-2
1B.8-1
1B.14-1*
3B.2-4
1B.8-3
3B.4-4#
3B.4-3#
1B.15-4#
1B.4-2#
1B.2-3#
3B.2-5*
1B.12-1*
1B.1-1*
1B.12-2*
1B.8-6*
1B.8-4*
1B.7-2*
1B.10-2*
1B.13-1*
09-28C
2C.50-2
2C.50-1
2C.49-1*
2C.46-1
2C.49-2*
2C.46-2*
2C.51-1
2C.48-1
2C.41-2*
2C.48-2*
2C.42-1*
2C.43-1
2C.52-1
2C.41-1*
3C.43-3
2C.45-1*
2C.45-2
2C.42-2*
3C.42-4
2C.47-1*
3C.42-3#
3C.45-4#
3C.45-3*
3C.43-2#
2C.44-1*
2C.44-2*
128
117
191
49
614
187
508
539
261
159
321
791
293
245
371
435
341
521
819
70
440
676
470
468
516
270
506
71
70
119
14
93
93
87
360
87
33
41
251
41
35
45
21
46
144
319
50
37
109
132
108
309
59
174
0.57
0.62
0.64
0.30
0.16
0.51
0.18
0.69
0.35
0.22
0.13
0.33
0.15
0.15
0.13
0.05
0.14
0.29
0.40
0.74
0.09
0.17
0.29
0.24
0.62
0.23
0.35
0.11
0.31
0.00
0.27
0.45
0.11
0.13
1.56
0.47
-0.03
0.15
0.11
0.06
0.71
0.96
0.24
0.19
0.07
0.37
0.73
-0.04
1.77
0.49
0.62
1.07
0.85
0.43
0.0702
0.0688
0.0725
0.0664
0.0672
0.0651
0.0673
0.0727
0.0615
0.0606
0.0590
0.0613
0.0622
0.0607
0.0590
0.0599
0.0607
0.0609
0.0622
0.0718
0.0630
0.0608
0.0604
0.0598
0.0736
0.0604
0.0625
0.0012
0.0015
0.0008
0.0030
0.0008
0.0011
0.0008
0.0016
0.0015
0.0009
0.0009
0.0006
0.0009
0.0026
0.0021
0.0011
0.0009
0.0007
0.0010
0.0044
0.0006
0.0017
0.0013
0.0014
0.0015
0.0024
0.0013
1.54
1.49
1.55
1.26
1.27
1.23
1.25
1.13
0.93
0.88
0.85
0.88
0.89
0.86
0.83
0.84
0.85
0.85
0.86
0.99
0.86
0.80
0.74
0.72
0.87
0.69
0.61
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.06
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.1590
0.1569
0.1552
0.1381
0.1375
0.1368
0.1344
0.1122
0.1092
0.1055
0.1039
0.1039
0.1036
0.1024
0.1018
0.1018
0.1017
0.1007
0.1001
0.0996
0.0985
0.0961
0.0889
0.0871
0.0858
0.0824
0.0704
0.0015
0.0016
0.0014
0.0021
0.0007
0.0010
0.0007
0.0008
0.0008
0.0009
0.0007
0.0004
0.0007
0.0008
0.0006
0.0006
0.0010
0.0005
0.0004
0.0015
0.0006
0.0005
0.0005
0.0019
0.0005
0.0006
0.0004
952
941
927
834
830
828
812
677
668
647
639
637
635
628
626
625
624
618
613
604
603
591
548
537
520
508
435
9
9
8
12
4
6
4
4
5
6
4
3
4
5
4
3
6
3
2
8
3
3
3
11
3
4
2
933
893
1001
820
843
776
846
1007
656
626
568
651
681
628
568
600
628
637
682
979
708
630
616
595
1032
617
690
35
46
22
95
26
37
24
44
52
33
35
21
31
92
79
39
33
24
34
126
21
62
45
49
42
86
44
98
95
108
98
102
94
104
149
98
97
89
102
107
100
91
96
101
103
111
162
117
107
113
111
198
121
159
299
97
60
133
122
80
119
136
177
226
334
322
514
188
511
263
273
611
398
439
375
447
195
424
346
413
204
64
38
24
24
64
13
69
47
83
54
164
105
48
224
98
79
97
81
123
74
199
37
212
83
172
0.70
0.68
0.65
0.19
0.20
0.84
0.12
0.52
0.28
0.38
0.17
0.52
0.21
0.27
0.45
0.39
0.30
0.16
0.21
0.29
0.20
0.46
0.20
0.52
0.25
0.43
0.22
-0.04
0.89
0.23
-0.20
1.02
0.05
-0.04
0.13
0.22
0.20
-0.17
-0.06
-0.14
0.12
-0.29
-0.17
0.73
0.81
0.54
0.61
0.00
0.37
0.35
1.47
2.95
0.0699
0.0712
0.0620
0.0650
0.0706
0.0663
0.0613
0.0621
0.0584
0.0587
0.0591
0.0619
0.0601
0.0634
0.0602
0.0630
0.0604
0.0585
0.0609
0.0581
0.0624
0.0618
0.0548
0.0602
0.0600
0.0540
0.0009
0.0013
0.0030
0.0013
0.0032
0.0035
0.0018
0.0017
0.0014
0.0016
0.0011
0.0010
0.0007
0.0011
0.0010
0.0014
0.0011
0.0013
0.0018
0.0012
0.0014
0.0009
0.0026
0.0013
0.0022
0.0035
1.58
1.50
1.25
1.28
1.29
1.20
0.99
0.93
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.90
0.87
0.92
0.87
0.91
0.87
0.83
0.87
0.82
0.88
0.87
0.76
0.84
0.80
0.48
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.03
0.06
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.1644
0.1522
0.1463
0.1424
0.1329
0.1311
0.1166
0.1086
0.1070
0.1060
0.1057
0.1057
0.1049
0.1054
0.1047
0.1048
0.1039
0.1034
0.1033
0.1018
0.1022
0.1015
0.1006
0.1009
0.0965
0.0642
0.0015
0.0019
0.0022
0.0016
0.0017
0.0018
0.0014
0.0012
0.0011
0.0011
0.0010
0.0010
0.0009
0.0011
0.0005
0.0010
0.0010
0.0009
0.0007
0.0009
0.0006
0.0006
0.0009
0.0006
0.0009
0.0007
983
912
887
861
800
793
712
664
658
652
650
647
644
644
643
641
637
636
634
627
626
622
622
620
594
402
9
11
12
9
9
10
8
8
7
6
6
6
6
7
3
6
6
5
4
6
4
3
5
3
5
4
924
965
675
774
946
814
650
679
545
557
569
669
606
722
609
709
619
547
636
533
686
668
403
611
605
370
28
39
105
40
94
112
62
59
54
59
40
35
25
35
37
48
40
47
64
45
49
33
106
47
78
145
94
106
76
90
118
103
91
102
83
85
88
103
94
112
95
111
97
86
100
85
110
107
65
99
102
92
Spot
Isotope ratios
232
Th
238
U
% 206
common
207
0.68
0.46
0.84
0.66
1.6
0.76
0.81
0.71
0.67
0.22
0.24
-0.03
-0.08
0.11
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.06
0.0599
0.0607
0.0625
0.062
0.0617
0.0607
0.063
0.0601
0.0608
U ppm
Th ppm
Lajedinho monzodiorite
L-11.1
425
281
L11-1.2
357
158
L11-2*
225
184
L11-2.2*
677
435
L11-3*
223
345
L10-1
224
165
L10-2*
205
161
L10-3
343
237
L10-4**
322
208
Age (Ma)
206
Pb
Pb
1s
207
Pb
235
U
1s
206
Pb
238
U
1s
206
Pb
238
U
1s
207
1.6
1.9
1.4
0.9
2.9
2.7
2.1
1.8
2.2
0.83
0.84
0.89
0.87
0.84
0.84
0.89
0.83
0.87
1.68
1.93
1.51
0.94
2.94
2.74
2.16
1.92
2.22
0.1002
0.1
0.1027
0.1014
0.0985
0.0998
0.1021
0.1004
0.1042
0.5366
0.5103
0.6237
0.3712
0.647
0.6433
0.6547
0.5198
0.5175
615.4
614.4
630.3
622.8
605.7
613
626.4
616.9
639.2
3.1
3
3.7
2.2
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.1
3.1
601
630
691
676
665
629
708
606
631
206
Pb
Pb
1s
35
40
29
19
61
57
44
40
47
Concor
dance%
99
103
110
108
110
103
113
98
99
(continued on next page)
274
Spot
Isotope ratios
U ppm
L2-1*
L2-2**
L3-1
L3-1.2
L8-2*
L8-3*
L8-3.2*
L6-2*
L6-3**
L7-1*
L7-2
L7-3
L7-3.2*
L14-1*
L17-1**
L22-1*
L18-1*
602
447
268
494
217
190
411
519
348
415
186
261
316
350
290
322
651
Th ppm
592
223
171
477
161
17
286
239
300
288
147
207
189
288
162
218
300
Age (Ma)
232
Th
238
U
% 206
common
207
1.02
0.52
0.66
1
0.77
0.09
0.72
0.48
0.89
0.72
0.82
0.82
0.62
0.85
0.58
0.7
0.48
-0.04
-0.02
0.06
0.03
0.33
-0.55
0.21
-0.18
-0.05
0.2
-0.02
0.33
-0.2
0.26
0.15
0.05
0.11
0.0613
0.0611
0.0608
0.061
0.0586
0.0676
0.0584
0.063
0.0611
0.0569
0.0615
0.0598
0.063
0.0594
0.0603
0.0622
0.0606
206
Pb
Pb
1s
207
Pb
235
U
1s
206
Pb
238
U
1s
206
Pb
238
U
1s
207
1
1.5
1.5
1
3.1
3.1
1.8
1.3
1.2
3.1
1.6
2.6
2.9
2.4
1.6
1.4
1.4
0.87
0.89
0.85
0.85
0.82
0.89
0.82
0.89
0.89
0.82
0.86
0.85
0.87
0.82
0.88
0.87
0.89
1.31
1.56
1.62
1.08
3.13
3.32
1.93
1.4
1.31
3.15
1.8
2.74
2.94
2.47
1.66
1.49
1.41
0.1027
0.1056
0.1012
0.101
0.1019
0.0952
0.1015
0.1026
0.1051
0.1048
0.1016
0.1025
0.0999
0.1005
0.1058
0.1013
0.1063
0.7959
0.4813
0.5637
0.4247
0.6749
1.2983
0.7719
0.4349
0.5298
0.4999
0.7504
0.7068
0.6442
0.6506
0.5827
0.5389
0.3831
630
647.4
621.5
620.1
625.3
586.3
623.4
629.9
644.5
642.5
623.5
629.2
613.7
617.3
648.5
622.1
651.4
4.8
3
3.3
2.5
4
7.3
4.6
2.6
3.2
3.1
4.5
4.2
3.8
3.8
3.6
3.2
2.4
650
642
631
639
553
856
545
709
642
487
656
598
709
583
616
680
626
206
Pb
Pb
Concor
dance%
1s
22
32
33
21
67
63
39
28
26
69
35
57
61
52
34
30
29
103
99
102
103
88
146
87
113
100
76
105
95
116
94
95
109
96
Obs: (1) Reproducibility of Pb/U for BR266 zircon standard was 1.15% (2s; n 14). (2) Pb isotope ratios corrected for common Pb. (3) Ranked age shown is 206 Pb/238U age
if < 800 Ma and 207Pb/206 Pb age for others. (4) * Data with common Pb correction >1% and/or discordant: i.e. 206 Pb/238U and 207Pb/206 Pb ages not overlapping as 2s; data
not considered in age discussion. (5) @ statistical outlier; data not considered in age discussion.
OBS: (1) Notation: data collected during three analytical sessions (1, 2 and 3); sample B corresponds to 04-116B, and C to 09-28C. (2) Pb isotope ratios corrected for common
Pb. (3) Reproducibility of Pb/U for BR266 zircon standard was: session 1 (1.88%; 2s; n 7); session 2 (1.54%; 2s; n 12); session 3 (0.88%; 2s; n 6); assigned error to
combined data sets is 2.00% (2s). (4) * Data with common Pb correction >1% and/or >10% discordan; these data not considered in age discussion (see text). (5) # Youngest
concordant population; interpreted as the emplacement event at 623 7 Ma (n 8; MSWD 0.89).
Obs: (1) Reproducibility of Pb/U for Temora zircon standard was 0.44% (2s; n 13).* Data with U>1% or >5% discordant were not considered in age discussion.**- statistical
outlier; data not considered in age discussion.
Table A2
, Caninde
, and Macurure
domains.
Major and Trace element data for granitic rocks of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
Granite
Angico
Sample
Number
Ponto
13
Areias
JUTC
11
Major elements (wt%)

SiO2
71.59
71.39
TiO2
0.291
0.275
Al2O3
15.10
15.08
Fe2O3t
1.21
1.47
MnO
0.02
0.02
MgO
0.33
0.39
CaO
1.42
1.30
Na2O
4.42
4.35
K2O
4.77
4.86
P2O5
0.101
0.097
LOI
0.37
0.39
Total
99.60
99.60
Trace elements by XRF (mg/g)
V
19.7
21.1
Cr
22.6
20.5
Ni
<1
1
Zn
56
68
Ga
29.1
28.7
Rb
180
184
Sr
603
623
Y
3.4
4.5
Zr
180
178
Nb
4.8
4.7
Ba
1306
1347
Pb
39
38
Granite
Formosa
Sample
Number
JUD
13C

SiO2
72.49
TiO2
0.221
Al2O3
15.54
Fe2O3t
0.89
MnO
0.01
MgO
0.22
Canudos
Capivara
JUTC
33
JTC
112
JUMS
27
JUMS
33
JTC
35
Lagoas
JUMS
20
JUMS
22B
JUD
72
Santa Helena
JUD
86
JUD
88
JUD
5
JUD
33
71.31
0.295
15.18
1.55
0.02
0.43
1.26
4.27
4.91
0.135
0.40
99.80
70.86
0.315
14.77
1.31
0.02
0.68
1.12
4.41
5.02
0.176
1.14
99.80
68.73
0.424
15.83
1.70
0.02
0.50
1.25
4.67
5.29
0.247
1.04
99.70
71.93
0.246
15.16
1.11
0.02
0.33
0.97
4.55
5.28
0.090
0.40
100.10
70.74
0.328
15.26
1.73
0.03
0.67
2.55
4.33
3.37
0.095
0.75
99.90
69.54
0.368
15.70
1.90
0.03
0.71
2.78
4.60
3.33
0.111
0.70
99.80
72.70
0.188
15.04
0.92
0.01
0.26
0.89
4.10
5.35
0.074
0.43
99.90
70.14
0.414
15.57
1.57
0.01
0.54
1.92
4.89
3.92
0.127
0.60
99.70
68.99
0.446
16.06
1.78
0.02
0.61
1.96
4.74
4.34
0.141
0.37
99.50
70.47
0.396
15.61
1.56
0.01
0.57
1.87
4.89
3.80
0.131
0.50
99.80
69.45
0.410
16.00
2.06
0.02
0.69
1.44
4.72
4.41
0.170
0.82
100.20
64.95
0.627
14.80
4.21
0.08
2.76
3.90
3.31
4.28
0.331
0.39
99.60
19.1
11.6
<1
68
29.4
187
615
3.6
183
4.7
1330
38
21.2
21.5
7.9
62
27.9
214
497
6.1
220
6.7
1114
47
23.9
20.2
15.4
67
29.6
201
548
6.8
306
8.1
1324
57
17.8
26.8
9.3
48
29.7
255
480
4.7
173
3.7
1057
56
32
15.7
<1
47
21.6
121
413
4.9
110
7
823
37
35
72
14.7
43
20.1
107
473
5.5
123
7.8
899
36
10.3
5.2
6.3
49
25.9
242
283
3.2
99
2.6
767
50
21.9
93
<1
83
29
137
529
1.5
180
8
1015
49
29.1
159
<1
84
28.1
186
440
2
160
7.1
858
84
22.8
132
<1
73
26.1
161
443
2.5
151
6.3
831
77
33
48
<1
80
31
193
525
4.7
222
8.5
731
40
78
203
26.9
66
20.4
134
658
18.3
207
10.6
1238
42
ria
Glo
Itabi
Carabas
JUD
15B
JUD
18
JUTC
138
JUMS
03C
JUMS
9
JUD
34
JUD
35B
JUD
37A
JUD
37B
JUD
80A
JUD
80B
JUD
10A
JUD
10B
71.75
0.240
15.36
0.85
0.01
0.20
69.40
0.647
14.40
1.81
0.01
0.48
66.63
0.517
16.37
3.54
0.06
1.40
67.14
0.448
16.00
3.36
0.06
1.46
67.22
0.498
16.38
3.40
0.06
1.34
72.69
0.088
15.46
0.47
0.02
0.09
73.35
0.101
15.10
0.55
0.01
0.12
72.99
0.077
15.78
0.53
0.01
0.09
71.27
0.096
16.76
0.51
0.01
0.11
66.01
0.725
15.62
4.16
0.06
2.23
73.90
0.065
15.04
0.53
0.01
0.08
69.88
0.401
15.24
2.11
0.03
1.22
71.52
0.269
15.64
1.02
0.01
0.43
275
Granite
Formosa
Sample
Number
JUD
13C
CaO
0.53
0.19
4.51
4.32
Na2O
K2O
4.49
5.43
P2O5
0.056
0.112
LOI
0.65
0.66
Total
99.60
99.10
V
21.8
15.4
Cr
246
64
Ni
<1
<1
Zn
60
44
Ga
27.4
28.1
Rb
176
277
Sr
667
494
Y
6.2
<1
Zr
155
192
Nb
3.3
4
Ba
1274
1284
Pb
35
45
Granite
Caraibas
Sample
Number
JUD
11
JUD
9
Lajedinho
Sample
Number
FS
169
JUTC
138
JUMS
03C
JUMS
9
JUD
34
JUD
35B
JUD
37A
JUD
37B
JUD
80A
JUD
80B
JUD
10A
JUD
10B
2.84
4.52
2.65
0.203
2.07
99.00
3.29
3.92
3.47
0.189
0.63
100.00
3.55
3.85
3.44
0.189
0.68
100.20
3.54
4.51
2.22
0.227
0.47
99.90
0.67
4.66
4.79
0.029
0.40
99.40
0.69
4.36
4.63
0.023
0.48
99.40
0.97
4.83
4.79
0.023
0.23
100.30
0.78
5.23
4.73
0.027
0.54
100.10
3.81
3.81
2.08
0.386
0.61
99.50
0.81
4.91
4.55
0.030
0.40
100.30
2.18
4.42
3.44
0.103
0.80
99.80
1.35
4.91
4.00
0.085
0.52
99.80
17.5
250
<1
138
23.2
90
531
1.5
346
9
951
12.1
50
38
12.6
67
22.8
117
452
14.4
194
11.8
977
29.6
52
49
20
51
19.5
105
585
13.3
191
9.3
1367
35
47
98
21.4
60
22.7
110
503
13.7
212
11.2
640
28.6
7.8
168
<1
32
25.4
262
224
2.4
70
6.9
521
74
6.3
46
<1
32
24.2
212
255
6.1
83
2.9
592
51
4.7
23
<1
34
26.4
251
191
<1
63
5.3
342
90
11.1
95
<1
37
27.9
261
260
<1
67
7.7
625
65
91
122
17.1
76
24
84
649
20.8
255
12.8
821
19.6
8,7
20.1
<1
35
29.6
285
131
<1
55
7.5
238
70
35
143
14.2
65
23.7
128
440
4.4
139
6.2
735
55
24
53
1.7
53
21.9
117
454
<1
144
3.3
1050
57

SiO2
57.19
59.33
TiO2
1.097
1.074
Al2O3
18.20
17.06
Fe2O3t
6.95
6.64
MnO
0.12
0.12
MgO
2.19
2.02
CaO
5.56
5.08
Na2O
4.55
4.16
K2O
2.40
2.98
P2O5
0.412
0.431
LOI
0.51
0.42
Total
99.18
99.31
V
105
107
Cr
20.2
30
Ni
29.5
28.3
Zn
94
89
Camar
a
Monte Alegre
Lajedinho
JTC
10
JUMS
14B
JUMS
16
JUMS
18
JUD
19
JUD
21
JUD
22B
JUTC
7
JUTC
8
JUTC
85
JUMS
35
FS
168
71.31
0.366
14.84
1.43
0.02
0.36
1.01
4.16
5.47
0.119
0.35
99.40
70.79
0.388
15.34
1.52
0.02
0.40
1.03
4.16
5.52
0.129
0.29
99.60
73.80
0.181
14.44
0.97
0.02
0.25
0.83
4.52
4.68
0.077
0.32
100.10
72.52
0.184
15.10
0.95
0.01
0.28
0.85
4.40
5.05
0.101
0.67
100.10
71.87
0.205
15.17
0.95
0.02
0.32
1.03
4.29
4.75
0.070
0.96
99.60
72.44
0.208
15.38
1.16
0.02
0.42
1.07
4.44
4.51
0.069
0.60
100.30
54.17
1.255
12.80
8.15
0.12
5.42
6.91
2.54
5.13
1.467
0.87
98.80
57.85
0.957
15.03
7.69
0.12
5.70
5.57
3.21
2.54
0.289
0.90
99.90
65.98
0.585
14.72
4.22
0.06
2.91
3.42
3.58
2.78
0.171
0.91
99.30
65.11
0.628
14.82
4.74
0.08
3.32
3.68
3.56
3.19
0.179
0.81
100.10
61.14
0.819
15.14
6.02
0.09
4.65
4.26
3.20
3.12
0.201
0.95
99.60
58.39
1.086
17.27
7.26
0.12
2.33
4.97
4.14
2.92
0.398
0.52
99.40
19.9
14.7
<1
63
28.9
216
595
3
292
5.6
1407
50
25.3
35
<1
62
25.2
212
602
2.3
280
6.2
1358
51
11.3
13.1
6.9
44
25.1
229
294
3.6
126
3.8
580
51
11
9.5
7.3
48
24.5
216
333
4.7
121
3
833
57
12.1
33
1.1
46
22
180
580
1.4
134
4.1
1125
45
14.8
50
1.4
41
23.4
198
541
2.3
121
4.6
897
46
152
115
27.2
112
19.1
143
791
33
187
9.8
2252
24.4
144
299
99
96
21.2
82
476
21.2
169
9.9
878
20.8
82
152
53
69
19.1
96
478
15.2
157
7.7
930
28
86
177
60
78
21.1
116
403
11.6
162
8.1
876
28.8
120
268
80
82
20.9
113
395
25.4
162
9.7
852
26.6
102
21.2
30.9
94
23.9
81
510
42
382
17.7
1547
16.2

Coronel Jo~
ao Sa
FS
170
Carabas
JUD
18
Pedra Furada

SiO2
67.33
63.82
TiO2
0.513
0.725
Al2O3
16.72
14.62
Fe2O3t
2.45
4.67
MnO
0.03
0.08
MgO
0.85
2.87
CaO
2.94
4.02
Na2O
4.39
3.28
K2O
3.26
4.04
P2O5
0.148
0.309
LOI
1.04
0.59
Total
99.70
99.00
V
27.6
88
Cr
63
320
Ni
2.1
23.3
Zn
59
73
Ga
24.4
20.3
Rb
112
130
Sr
524
649
Y
4.5
18.8
Zr
186
202
Nb
7.8
10.3
Ba
899
1167
Pb
39
38
Granite
ria
Glo
Itabi
JUD
15B
Stios Novos
CRN
109A
JUD
56
JUD
66
JUD
69
JUD
70
JUD
104
JUD
106
JUD
107
JUD
108
JUD
203
JUD
204
JUD
205
71.43
0.121
14.03
1.87
0.08
1.10
1.18
3.91
5.21
0.330
0.23
99.49
68.57
0.805
15.07
2.90
0.03
0.99
3.29
3.72
3.31
0.197
0.71
99.60
66.36
0.721
15.47
3.72
0.05
1.71
3.89
3.60
3.40
0.230
0.53
99.70
70.00
0.546
15.21
2.24
0.03
0.88
2.86
4.24
3.20
0.148
0.39
99.70
62.58
0.971
15.15
5.42
0.08
2.93
4.51
3.12
3.58
0.352
0.55
99.20
70.23
0.268
15.63
1.56
0.03
0.50
1.49
4.41
5.15
0.107
0.68
100.10
70.06
0.374
15.27
1.68
0.03
0.50
1.18
4.33
5.31
0.155
0.75
99.60
66.52
0.626
16.70
2.40
0.02
0.61
1.23
4.52
6.19
0.234
0.44
99.50
70.18
0.369
15.24
1.73
0.03
0.62
1.27
4.48
4.69
0.198
0.83
99.60
66.93
0.595
14.90
3.46
0.06
2.40
3.25
3.59
3.86
0.181
0.52
99.70
66.18
0.614
14.70
3.84
0.06
2.68
3.36
3.54
3.52
0.172
0.66
99.30
67.28
0.526
14.89
3.30
0.05
2.23
3.26
3.74
3.47
0.154
0.57
99.50
82
55
54
78
44
45
3.5
93
80
70
10.5
78
43
53
3.9
69
118
253
21.6
101
23.9
40
1
46
27
69
1.9
47
38
130
1.9
72
27.8
24.2
3.6
53
55
206
32
67
60
221
35
74
55
178
29.7
64
276

Coronel Jo~
ao Sa
Granite
Lajedinho
Sample
Number
FS
169
FS
170
CRN
109A
JUD
56
JUD
66
JUD
69
JUD
70
JUD
104
JUD
106
JUD
107
JUD
108
JUD
203
JUD
204
JUD
205
Ga
Rb
Sr
Y
Zr
Nb
Ba
Pb
27.4
68
577
42
363
16.8
1472
16.1
23.8
82
471
46
398
19.1
1364
18
24
78.7
599
37.8
553
17.4
1862
19.5
25.3
109
472
5.5
224
12.4
903
23.8
22.5
103
615
12.9
214
11.4
1010
31
24
102
529
6.4
179
8.5
912
26.5
22.6
103
667
19
301
12.3
1283
22.4
25.4
168
490
4.9
204
4.9
1245
59
25.3
206
476
4.1
252
4.7
1367
55
23.3
235
762
5
447
4.5
2214
44
25
191
561
11.7
174
9
1116
53
22.2
131
325
10.6
180
9.9
690
54
22.1
125
350
10.6
181
9.9
765
47
22.3
121
342
9.7
168
8.6
648
48
Granite
S. Novos
Queimada Grande
Sample
Number
JUD
206
JUD
94A
JUD
99
JUD
102
JUD
109
JUD
116
JUD
118
JUD
119
JUD
128A
JUD
128B
JUD
133A
JUD
133B
JUD
177
65.81
0.805
15.14
3.93
0.06
1.88
3.39
4.24
3.33
0.351
0.54
99.50
64.64
0.703
15.21
4.25
0.07
2.16
3.68
3.93
3.71
0.298
0.48
99.10
65.18
0.655
14.75
4.20
0.07
2.56
4.01
3.69
3.54
0.221
0.53
99.40
70.89
0.407
14.14
2.27
0.04
0.94
1.91
3.80
4.61
0.176
0.78
100.00
66.63
0.681
15.87
3.36
0.05
1.04
2.93
4.14
3.95
0.233
0.41
99.30
64.04
0.758
15.26
4.44
0.07
2.28
3.76
3.95
4.02
0.293
0.78
99.60
59.54
1.034
15.34
6.33
0.10
3.74
4.87
4.13
3.44
0.422
0.65
99.60
61.77
0.760
15.35
5.47
0.09
3.19
3.94
4.13
3.25
0.331
0.84
99.10
61.94
0.980
15.23
5.33
0.08
3.01
4.14
3.77
3.79
0.396
0.72
99.40
57.60
1.099
16.21
7.31
0.12
4.52
5.08
4.38
2.27
0.364
1.05
100.00
64.55
0.731
15.07
4.58
0.07
2.38
3.57
3.65
3.90
0.286
0.79
99.60
68.03
0.582
16.09
2.84
0.04
0.87
2.57
4.09
4.15
0.186
0.44
99.90
83
129
19.1
77
22.2
107
723
21.4
226
11.5
1047
38
74
127
20.9
69
21.3
126
581
16.9
237
12.3
1135
37
81
284
33
58
20.3
124
481
20.3
233
12.7
840
37
39
81
8.3
48
23.5
163
352
9.2
158
9.7
616
48
63
96
2.2
80
24.5
141
615
14
241
13.9
1420
35
78
140
21.5
72
22.7
123
589
15.1
217
11.6
1118
41
126
159
40
103
24.2
144
663
14.4
211
10.4
1008
38
101
162
34
99
24.1
151
634
12.6
206
7.4
896
44
97
257
34
89
24.4
131
688
17.3
271
12.3
1101
43
140
352
59
118
26
131
528
14.7
259
10.3
362
27.3
79
327
25.4
71
21.2
127
563
15.7
232
11.6
952
45
47
33
1.6
69
24.3
151
571
10.6
200
12.2
1362
39

67.52
SiO2
TiO2
0.548
Al2O3
14.82
Fe2O3t
3.46
MnO
0.05
MgO
2.27
CaO
3.46
3.74
Na2O
K2O
3.20
P2O5
0.148
LOI
0.51
Total
99.70
V
59
Cr
393
Ni
31
Zn
64
Ga
21.1
Rb
107
Sr
371
Y
9.7
Zr
156
Nb
8.4
Ba
693
Pb
45
Stios Novos
Granite
Queimada Grande
Poo Redondo
Sample
Number
JUD
179
JUD
157
JUD
159
JUD
163
JUD
182
JUD
183
JUD
184A
JUD
184B
JUD
184C
JUD
185
JUD
186
JUD
191
75.41
0.085
14.14
0.86
0.03
0.22
1.71
3.59
3.67
0.034
0.51
100.30
72.09
0.225
14.89
1.74
0.04
0.42
1.78
3.58
4.10
0.058
0.46
99.40
72.24
0.148
15.20
1.50
0.04
0.42
1.85
3.40
4.03
0.080
0.70
99.60
74.46
0.076
14.88
0.95
0.06
0.25
0.98
3.37
4.48
0.104
0.66
100.30
72.03
0.248
15.19
1.94
0.05
0.51
2.00
3.54
3.71
0.098
0.44
99.80
70.31
0.307
15.85
2.33
0.06
0.57
2.20
3.92
3.82
0.170
0.45
100.00
72.85
0.145
14.97
1.26
0.03
0.30
1.58
3.49
4.72
0.054
0.43
99.80
66.17
0.483
17.06
3.69
0.07
0.93
3.35
3.91
2.38
0.296
0.72
99.10
73.68
0.111
14.93
1.07
0.04
0.26
1.15
3.47
5.12
0.099
0.45
100.40
74.50
0.061
14.62
0.50
0.04
0.07
1.01
3.72
5.35
0.011
0.25
100.13
71.85
0.247
15.34
1.99
0.06
0.49
2.17
3.65
3.48
0.120
0.48
99.90
10.6
32
<1
22.1
14.5
95
272
10.7
59
6.9
1136
35
16.3
112
1.2
49
20.3
134
262
11.6
108
10
781
29.6
11.7
41
<1
46
19.8
127
226
13.1
88
8.8
720
32
5.8
29.1
<1
32
20.8
159
104
15.3
61
11.7
360
31
19.5
68
<1
52
21.4
150
308
10.2
150
13.6
835
20.7
18.5
51
<1
66
23.7
157
306
18.6
184
15.3
736
24.9
12.8
115
<1
37
18.7
165
251
16.2
91
8.9
718
33
35
103
<1
89
23.9
118
547
18.7
291
15.2
977
23
8.4
44
<1
42
17.9
181
155
10.1
90
8.6
510
35.1
4.7
71
<1
18.1
21.7
207
115
12.5
35
19.8
242
63
11.8
58
<1
57
23.3
147
268
11
190
15.7
759
27
JUD
188

SiO2
69.73
64.05
TiO2
0.322
0.893
Al2O3
15.97
15.22
Fe2O3t
1.60
4.81
MnO
0.02
0.075
MgO
0.45
2.56
CaO
1.41
3.65
Na2O
4.80
3.59
K2O
4.46
3.85
P2O5
0.119
0.341
LOI
0.50
0.67
Total
99.40
99.7
V
24.2
79
Cr
31
134
Ni
1.2
24.9
Zn
55
79
Ga
25.9
21.2
Rb
148
129
Sr
637
557
Y
6.2
18.3
Zr
158
265
Nb
6.4
14.8
Ba
1339
1051
Pb
42
39
277
Table A2.1
Rare earth and other trace elements by ICP-MS (mg/g).
Granite
Angico
Areias
S. Helena
Canudos
Capivara
Formosa
Itabi
ria
Glo
Sample
JUTC-33
JUMS-33
JUD-72
JUD-05
JUD-33
JUD-18
JUMS-09
JUD-34
JUD-80A
JUD-80B
JUD-11
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
Hf
Ta
Th
U
17.04
45.20
4.16
15.84
2.71
0.72
1.76
0.16
0.66
0.09
0.20
0.02
0.15
0.02
5.45
0.39
6.00
1.80
16.94
23.27
3.17
10.66
1.49
0.33
0.89
0.08
0.36
0.05
0.11
0.01
0.07
0.01
4.92
0.32
7.42
2.51
11.81
29.06
2.69
10.29
1.75
0.49
1.18
0.11
0.46
0.05
0.13
0.01
0.07
0.01
5.40
0.51
3.86
0.59
6.31
28.86
1.66
6.70
1.43
0.38
1.17
0.14
0.62
0.10
0.25
0.04
0.21
0.03
6.67
0.71
7.65
7.41
55.75
96.81
13.35
50.99
9.12
2.31
6.98
0.87
4.36
0.79
2.13
0.28
1.84
0.27
8.23
0.75
18.88
3.32
47.90
122.61
10.00
35.97
5.56
1.41
3.51
0.28
0.80
0.07
0.12
0.01
0.05
0.01
9.82
0.42
18.92
3.09
21.70
52.24
5.06
19.18
3.31
0.91
2.93
0.40
2.22
0.39
1.10
0.15
1.00
0.15
6.43
0.82
6.64
5.35
2.25
6.37
0.54
2.25
0.59
0.17
0.57
0.07
0.36
0.06
0.16
0.02
0.13
0.01
2.76
1.14
1.78
1.84
77.69
171.69
18.06
64.55
10.08
2.36
7.15
0.89
4.64
0.85
2.34
0.32
2.18
0.32
8.94
0.65
32.91
2.96
77.98
127.44
18.26
65.46
10.18
2.37
7.32
0.91
4.81
0.87
2.42
0.33
2.20
0.33
7.55
0.66
29.21
1.55
21.02
61.00
5.34
19.75
3.38
0.92
2.33
0.26
1.23
0.18
0.49
0.06
0.39
0.05
5.54
0.61
9.16
2.84
Granite
Monte Alegre

Camara
Lajedinho
S. Novos
Queimada Grande
Sample
JUD-21
JUD-22B
JUMS-35
CRN-109A
JUD-204
JUD-109
JUD-133B
JUD-179
JUD-157
JUD-183
JUD-191
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
Hf
Ta
Th
U
4.29
5.36
1.02
3.96
0.90
0.26
0.67
0.08
0.40
0.06
0.17
0.02
0.15
0.02
3.74
0.50
2.04
1.12
104.65
208.00
26.14
104.20
18.72
4.69
15.05
1.72
8.04
1.32
3.27
0.41
2.53
0.34
5.67
0.60
23.34
4.59
38.55
80.90
9.09
33.54
5.78
1.48
4.82
0.63
3.44
0.63
1.71
0.23
1.48
0.21
5.50
0.67
11.59
1.06
41.97
78.42
10.32
39.55
7.05
1.88
6.46
1.05
6.06
1.21
3.36
0.50
3.18
0.44
9.64
0.91
7.45
2.09
30.14
56.60
7.48
28.59
5.08
1.21
3.96
0.50
2.57
0.44
1.15
0.15
0.98
0.14
5.73
0.74
9.90
2.05
14.60
32.34
3.38
13.11
2.58
0.67
2.10
0.28
1.57
0.28
0.83
0.12
0.87
0.14
5.59
1.04
9.83
7.37
43.39
67.67
10.40
38.34
6.53
1.51
5.13
0.67
3.60
0.64
1.81
0.25
1.72
0.26
8.62
1.24
21.16
2.57
10.36
14.10
2.52
9.97
1.90
0.52
1.43
0.16
0.83
0.14
0.44
0.06
0.43
0.06
4.75
0.70
2.67
0.76
9.62
19.11
2.29
8.31
1.59
0.39
1.33
0.17
0.89
0.17
0.48
0.07
0.53
0.08
1.45
0.49
3.68
0.95
26.63
55.36
6.10
22.40
3.78
0.73
2.87
0.38
1.88
0.30
0.79
0.11
0.78
0.11
6.44
1.01
7.93
1.16
39.92
89.97
9.35
34.01
5.28
0.64
3.87
0.44
1.95
0.28
0.64
0.08
0.48
0.06
5.54
0.86
14.11
1.34
Carabas
Poo Redondo
Table A3
, Caninde
, and Macurure
domains.
Sm-Nd isotopic data for granitic rocks of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
Sample number
Granite unit
Sm (ppm)
Nd (ppm)
(147Sm/144Nd)m
(143/144Nd)m
Nd (0)
Nd (T)
TDM (Ga)
T (Ga)
JUTC-138B
JUMS-09
JUMS-14B
JUMS-27
JUMS-33
JUTC-33
JUD-34
JUD-80A
JUD-80B
JUD-11
FS-84A
FS-88
JUD-18
JUD-33
JUD-5
JUD-21
JUD-22B
JUD-72
JUD-88
JUD-35A
FS-57
FS-85
FS-90
FS-65
FS-67
JUMS-35
Itabi granite
Itabi granite
Pedra Furada granite
Areias granite
Areias granite
Angico granite
ria granite
Glo
ria granite
Glo
ria granite
Glo
Carabas granite
Carabas granite
Formosa granite
Formosa granite
Capivara granite
Canudos granite
Monte Alegre granite
Santa Helena granite
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
tonalite
Camara
5.30
5.13
8.13
9.64
4.78
5.78
2.43
10.35
2.19
5.14
5.80
6.12
7.74
8.75
4.43
3.28
16.46
3.91
4.49
5.72
5.48
4.99
7.44
7.23
23.33
6.19
29.59
29.87
59.41
59.56
29.46
37.77
10.51
65.73
8.22
32.13
33.59
35.10
50.42
47.38
26.17
17.55
87.03
24.43
26.28
27.25
25.33
23.05
36.67
38.85
105.26
32.73
0.1082
0.1038
0.0827
0.0979
0.0981
0.0925
0.1395
0.0952
0.1610
0.0966
0.1043
0.1053
0.0927
0.1116
0.1023
0.1131
0.1144
0.0967
0.1033
0.1270
0.1308
0.1309
0.1226
0.1124
0.1340
0.1143
0.512058
0.512031
0.51199
0.512064
0.512054
0.512057
0.512129
0.512059
0.512419
0.511897
0.511894
0.512066
0.511639
0.512122
0.511957
0.512132
0.512127
0.51186
0.511918
0.512159
0.512248
0.512291
0.511973
0.512047
0.512246
0.511919
-11.3
-11.8
-12.6
-11.2
-11.4
-11.3
-9.9
-11.3
-4.3
-14.5
-14.5
-11.2
-19.5
-10.1
-13.3
-9.9
-10.0
-15.2
-14.0
-9.4
-7.6
-6.8
-13.0
-11.5
-7.6
-14.0
-4.8
-5.0
-4.2
-3.9
-4.1
-3.6
-5.7
-3.8
-1.6
-7.0
-7.7
-4.4
-11.8
-3.8
-6.3
-3.7
-3.9
-7.8
-7.1
-4.2
-2.7
-1.9
-7.5
-5.3
-3.0
-7.5
1.41
1.39
1.22
1.28
1.3
1.23
1.86
1.26
1.78
1.48
1.6
1.36
1.76
1.36
1.47
1.37
1.39
1.53
1.54
1.54
1.45
1.37
1.78
1.49
1.51
1.71
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.625
278
Sample number
Granite unit
Sm (ppm)
JUD-204
JUD-101
JUD-133B
JUD-179
JUD-109
JUD-157
JUD-191
JUD-183
MMC-90B
MMC-128
PT.2
CRN-109B
Stios Novos granite

Poo Redondo granite
Poo Redondo granite
Poo Redondo granite
Poo Redondo migmatite
5.22
16.44
6.69
4.74
4.10
2.38
5.10
2.91
4.17
10.61
7.20
7.62
Nd (ppm)
28.98
84.50
38.90
26.64
24.01
12.23
28.81
15.50
24.34
44.98
38.12
40.82
(147Sm/144Nd)m
(143/144Nd)m
Nd (0)
0.1088
0.1180
0.1040
0.1075
0.1032
0.1174
0.1070
0.1133
0.1035
0.1425
0.1142
0.1129
0.511998
0.512206
0.512128
0.512214
0.512161
0.512043
0.512054
0.512015
0.511967
0.512341
0.512244
0.512291
-12.5
-8.4
-9.9
-8.3
-9.3
-11.6
-11.4
-12.2
-13.1
-5.8
-7.7
-6.8
Nd (T)
-5.5
-2.1
-2.5
-1.1
-1.8
-5.3
-4.2
-5.5
-5.7
-1.5
-1.1
-0.1
TDM (Ga)
T (Ga)
1.51
1.32
1.26
1.18
1.21
1.57
1.4
1.55
1.48
1.48
1.22
1.14
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
Table A4
and Macurure
domains.
Strontium isotopic data for granitic rocks of the Poo Redondo-Maranco
Sample
Granite unit
Rb (ppm)
Sr (ppm)
(87Rb/86Sr)m
(87Sr/Sr86)m
(87Sr/86Sr)i
T (Ga)
JUTC-138B
JUMS-09
JUMS-14B
JUMS-27
JUMS-33
JUTC-33
JUD-34
JUD-80A
JUD-80B
JUD-11
FS-84A
FS-88
JUD-18
JUD-33
JUD-5
JUD-21
JUD-22B
JUD-72
JUD-88
JUD-35A
FS-57
FS-85
FS-90
FS-65
FS-67
JUMS-35
JUD-204
JUD-101
JUD-133B
JUD-179
JUD-109
JUD-157
JUD-191
JUD-183
MMC-90B
MMC-128
Itabi granite
Itabi granite
Pedra Furada granite
Areias granite
Areias granite
Angico granite
ria granite
Glo
ria granite
Glo
ria granite
Glo
Carabas granite
Carabas granite
Formosa granite
Formosa granite
Formosa granite
Canudos granite
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
mica schist
Macurure
Camar
a tonalite
Stios Novos granite
Poo Redondo granite
Poo Redondo granite
Poo Redondo granite
117
110
212
201
255
187
262
84
285
112
140
192
90
134
193
198
143
137
161
119
41
85
122
159
62
113
125
172
127
148
163
95
147
150
61
202
452
503
602
548
480
615
224
649
131
524
523
661
531
658
525
541
791
529
443
91
105
99
63
413
209
395
350
1312
563
637
352
272
268
308
310
126
0.7495
0.6332
1.0198
1.0622
1.5391
0.8804
3.3948
0.3746
6.3292
0.6189
0.7752
0.8410
0.4907
0.5895
1.0646
1.0599
0.5233
0.7500
1.0529
3.7960
1.1370
2.4885
5.6321
1.1159
0.8587
0.8284
1.0346
0.3794
0.6530
0.6725
1.3412
1.0120
1.5902
1.4116
0.5698
4.6623
0.71513
0.71514
0.71678
0.71723
0.72131
0.71564
0.73982
0.71213
0.76371
0.71607
0.71700
0.71477
0.71458
0.71356
0.71751
0.71733
0.71322
0.71708
0.72090
0.74121
0.77320
0.72573
0.76068
0.72591
0.71274
0.71654
0.72086
0.71127
0.71269
0.71273
0.71852
0.72285
0.72835
0.72611
0.71574
0.75988
0.70893
0.70990
0.70835
0.70845
0.70858
0.70836
0.71175
0.70903
0.71137
0.71095
0.71059
0.70782
0.71052
0.70868
0.70871
0.70856
0.70889
0.71088
0.71219
0.70982
0.76380
0.70515
0.71410
0.71668
0.70564
0.70916
0.71164
0.70789
0.70687
0.70673
0.70656
0.71383
0.71417
0.71353
0.71066
0.71832
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
References
Allard, G.O., Hurst, V.J., 1969. Brazil-Gabon geologic link supports continental drift.
Science 163, 528e532.
Almeida, M.E., Macambira, M.J.B., Oliveira, E.C., 2007. Geochemistry and zircon
geochronology of the I-type high-K calc-alkaline and S-type granitoid rocks
from southeastern Roraima, Brazil: Orosirian collisional magmatism evidence
(1.97e1.96 Ga) in central portion of Guyana Shield. Precambrian Res. 155,
69e97.
Archanjo, C.J., Hollanda, M.H.B.M., Rodrigues, S.W.O., Neves, B.B.B., Armstrong, R.,
2008. Fabrics of pre- and syntectonic granite plutons and chronology of shear
zones in the Eastern Borborema Province, NE Brazil. J. Struct. Geol. 30, 310e326.
Barbarin, B., 1999. A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their
origins and their geodynamic environments. Lithos 46, 605e626.
Bonin, B., 1990. From orogenic to anorogenic settings: evolution of granitoid suites
after a major orogenesis. Geol. J. 25, 261e270.
Briqueu, L., Bougault, H., Joron, J.L., 1984. Quantication of Nb, Ta, Ti and V anomalies in magmas associated with subduction zones e petrogenetic implications.
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 68, 297e308.
^ncia centrfuga residual

Brito Neves, B.B., Sial, A.N., Albuquerque, J.P.T., 1977. Verge
^ncias 7, 102e114.
no sistema de dobramentos Sergipano. Rev. Bras. Geocie
Brito Neves, B.B., Van Schmus, W.R., Santos, E.J., Campos Neto, M.C., Kozuch, M.,
~o de Dados,
1995. O Evento Carirs Velhos na Provncia Borborema: Integraa
~es e Perspectivas. Rev. Bras. Geocie
^ncias 25, 279e296.
Implicao
Brito Neves, B.B., Fuck, R.A., 2013. Neoproterozoic evolution of the basement of the
South-American platform. J. South Am. Earth Sci 47, 72e89.
Bueno, J.F., Oliveira, E.P., McNaughton, N., Laux, J.H., 2009. UePb dating of granites
in the Neoproterozoic Sergipano Belt, NE-Brazil: Implications for the timing and
duration of continental collision and extrusion tectonics in the Borborema
Province. Gondwana Res. 15, 86e97.
-Po o Redondo Domain:
Carvalho, M.J., 2005. Tectonic Evolution of the Maranco
Records of the Cariris Velhos and Brasiliano Orogenesis in the Sergipano Belt,
NE Brazil. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Campinas, Brazil, 202 pp (in
Portuguese).
Chappell, B.W., White, A.J.R., 1974. Two contrasting granite type. Pac. Geol. 8,
173e174.
Chappell, B.W., White, A.J.R., 1992. I- and S-types granites in Lachlan Fold Belt.
Trans. Royal Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 83, 1e26.
Chappell, B.W., White, A.J.R., 2001. Two contrasting granite types: 25 years later.
Aust. J. Earth Sci. 48, 489e499.
Clemens, J.D., 2003. S-type granitic magmasdpetrogenetic issues, models and evidence. Earth-Sci. Rev. 61, 1e18.
Compston, W., Williams, I.S., Meyer, C., 1984. U-Pb geochronology of zircons from
lunar breccia 73217 using a sensitive high massresolution ion microprobe. J.
Geophys. Res. 89, 252e534.
ner, A., 2013. The building blocks of continental crust: evidence for
Condie, K.C., Kro
a major change in the tectonic setting of continental growth at the end of the
Archean. Gondwana Res. 23, 394e402.
Cotta, A., Enzweiler, J., 2009. Quantication of major and trace elements in water
samples by ICP-MS and collision cell to attenuate Ar and Cl-based polyatomic
ions. J. Anal. Atomic Spectrom. 24, 1406e1413.
Crawford, M.B., Searle, M.P., 1993. Collision-related granitoid magmatism and
crustal structure of the Hunza Karakoram, North Pakistan. In: Treloar, P.J.,
Searle, M.P. (Eds.), Himalayan Tectonics, vol. 74. Geological Society Special
Publication, pp. 53e68.
D'el-Rey Silva, L.J.H., 1995. The evolution of basement gneiss domes of the Sergipano fold belt (NE Brazil) and its importance for the analysis of Proterozoic
basins. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 8, 325e340.
Davison, I., Santos, R.A., 1989. Tectonic evolution of the Sergipano fold Belt, NE
Brazil, during the Brasiliano orogeny. Precambrian Res. 45, 319e342.
Debon, F., Le Fort, P., 1983. A chemical-mineralogical classication of common
plutonic rocks and associations. Trans. Royal Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 73, 135e149.
DePaolo, D.J., 1981. Neodymium isotopes in the Colorado Front Range and implications for crust formation and mantle evolution in the Proterozoic. Nature 291,
193e197.
Eggins, S.M., Woodhead, J.D., Kinsley, L.P.J., Mortimer, G.E., Sylvester, P.,
McCulloch, M.T., Hergt, J.M., Handler, M.R., 1997. A simple method for the
precise determination of > 40 trace elements in geological samples by ICPMS
using enriched isotope internal standardisation. Chem. Geol. 134, 311e326.
El Baghadadil, M., El Boukhari, A., Jouider, A., Benyoucef, A., Nadem, A., 2003. Calcalkaline arc I-type Granitoid associated with S-type Granite in the Pan-African
Belt of Eastern Anti-Atlas (Saghro and Ougnat, South Morocco). Gondwana Res.
6, 557e572.
Evensen, N.M., Hamilton, P.J., O'Nions, R.K., 1978. Rare earth abundances in chondritic meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 1199e1212.
, E., Gleizes, G., Caby, R., 2002. Obliquely convergent tectonics and granite
Ferre
emplacement in the Trans-Saharan belt of Eastern Nigeria: a synthesis. Precambrian Res. 114, 199e219.
Fetter, A.H., Santos, T.J.S., Van Schumus, W.R., Hackspacher, P.C., Brito Neves, B.B.,
Arthaud, M.H., Nogueira Neto, J.A., Wernick, E., 2003. Evidence for Neoria Batholith of Cear
proterozoic Continental arc magmatism in the Santa Quite
a
State, NW Borborerna Province, NE Brazil: Implications for the assembly of
West Gondwana. Gondwana Res. 6, 265e273.
rster, H.J., Tischendorf, G., Trunbull, R.B., 1997. An evaluation of the Rb vs. (YNb)
Fo
discrimination diagram to infer tectonic setting of silicic igneous rocks. Lithos
40, 261e293.
Frost, B.R., Barnes, C.G., Collins, W.J., Arculus, R.J., Ellis, D.J., Frost, C.D., 2001.
A geochemical classication for granitic rocks. J. Petrol. 42, 2033e2048.
Gioia, S.M.C.L., Pimentel, M.M., 2000. Sm-Nd isotopic method in the geochronology
^ncias 72, 219e245.
laboratory of University of Braslia. An. Acad. Bras. Cie
~es, I.P., Silva Filho, A.F., 1995. An example of in situ granite formation in the
Guimara

northern boundary of the Proterozoic Sergipano fold belt, NE Brazil: the Xingo
Complex. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 8, 341e354.
~es, I.P., Silva Filho, A.F., Almeida, C.N., Van Schumus, W.R., Arajo, J.M.M.,
Guimara
Melo, S.C., Melo, E.B., 2004. Brasiliano (Pan-African) granitic magmatism in the
Paje-Paraba belt, Northeast Brazil: an isotopic and geochronological approach.
Precambrian Res. 135, 23e53.
Karsli, O., Chen, B., Aydin, F., Sen, C., 2007. Geochemical and SreNdePb isotopic
lek and Sariiek Plutons, Eastern Turkey: Imcompositions of the Eocene Do
plications for magma interaction in the genesis of high-K calc-alkaline granitoids in a post-collision extensional setting. Lithos 98, 67e96.
Klemperer, S.L., 2006. Crustal ow in Tibet: geophysical evidence for the physical
state of Tibetan lithosphere, and inferred patterns of active ow. In: Law, R.D.,
Searle, M.P., Godin, L. (Eds.), Channel Flow, Ductile Extrusion and Exhumation in
Continental Collision Zones, vol. 268. Geological Society, London, pp. 39e70.
Special Publications.
Le Maitre, R.W., Bateman, P., Dubek, A., Keller, J., Lameyre, J., Le Bas, M.J., Sabine, P.A.,
Schmid, R., Srensen, H., Streckeisen, A., Woolley, A.R., Zanettin, B. (Eds.), 1989.
A classication of igneous rocks and glossary of terms. Recommendations of the
International Union of Geological Sciences Subcommission on the Systematics
of Igneous Rocks. Blackwell, Oxford, p. 193.
Leech, M.L., Singh, S., Jain, A.K., Klemperer, S.L., Manickavasagam, R.M., 2005. The
onset of India-Asia collision: early, steep subduction required by timing of UHP
metamorphism in the western Himalaya. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 234, 83e97.
Liang, Q., Jing, H., Gregoire, D.C., 2000. Determination of trace elements in granites
by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 51, 507e513.
Long, L.E., Castellana, C.H., Sial, A.N., 2005. Age, origin and cooling history of the
Pluton, Bahia, Brazil. J. Petrol. 46, 255e273.
Coronel Jo~
ao Sa
Ludwig, K.R., 1999a. Squid, Version 1.02. Center Spec. Pub., Berkeley Geochron, p. 16.
No. 2.
279
Ludwig, K.R., 1999b. Isoplot/Ex Version 2.00, a Geochronological Toolkit for Mircosoft Excel. Center Spec. Pub., Berkeley Geochron, p. 46. No. 2.
Maniar, P.D., Piccoli, P.M., 1989. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol. Soc. Am.
Bull. 101, 635e643.
~o, H., 1998. Brasiliano-age
McReath, I., Lafon, J.M., Davison, I., Chaves, J.M., Conceia
Pluton.
granitoids in the Sergipana fold Belt, NE Brazil: the coronel Jo~
ao Sa
J. South Am. Earth Sci. 11, 51e66.
, Faixa Sergipana, nordeste do Brasil: um
Nascimento, R.S., 2005. Domnio Caninde
pico de uma seqe
^ncia de rifte continental neoestudo geoqumico e isoto
ica. Tese de Doutorado. Instituto de Geocie
^ncias, Universidade
proterozo
Estadual de Campinas, p. 140.
Nelson, K.D., Zhao, W., Brow, D.L., et al., 1996. Partially molten middle crust beneath
southern Tibet, synthesis of Project INDEPTH results. Science 274, 1684e1688.
Neves, S.P., Mariano, G., 1997. High-K calc-alcalic plutons in northeast Brazil: origin
of biotite diorite/quartz monzonite to granite association and implications for
the evolution of the Borborema Province. Int. Geol. Rev. 39, 621e638.
de
lec, A., Affaton, P., 2006. Synkinematic high-K calc-alkaline plutons
Njanko, T., Ne
associated with the Pan-African Central Cameroon shear zone (W-Tibati area):
petrology and geodynamic signicance. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 44, 494e510.
Oliveira, E.P., Carvalho, M.J., Nascimento, R.S., Arajo, M.N.C., Dantas, E., Basilici, G.,
Bueno, J.F., McNaughton, N., 2005. Evidence from detrital zircon geochronology
and whole-rock Sm-Nd isotopes for off-craton provenance of clastic metasio Nacional de
sedimentary units of the Sergipano belt, NE Brazil. In: X Simpo
^ nicos, Curitiba, Parana
, pp. 308e311. Boletim de Resumos
Estudos Tecto
Expandidos.
de Sa
~o Francisco complex:
Oliveira, E.P., Tarney, J., 1990. Petrogenesis of the Caninde
a major late Proterozoic gabbroic body in the Sergipe Foldbelt, northeastern
Brazil. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 3, 125e140.
Oliveira, E.P., Toteu, S.F., Arajo, M.N.C., Carvalho, M.J., Nascimento, R.S., Bueno, J.F.,
McNaughton, N., Basilici, G., 2006. Geologic correlation between the Neo belt (Cameroon, Africa).
proterozoic Sergipano belt (NE Brazil) and the Yaounde
J. Afr. Earth Sci. 44, 470e478.
Oliveira, E.P., Windley, B.F., Arajo, M.N.C., 2010. The Neoproterozoic Sergipano
orogenic belt, NE Brazil: a complete plate tectonic cycle in western Gondwana.
Precambrian Res. 181, 64e84.
Pearce, J.A., 1996. Sources and settings of granitic rocks. Episodes 19, 120e125.
Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.B.W., Tindle, A.G., 1984. Trace elements discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. J. Petrol. 25, 956e983.
Poma, S., Quenardelle, S., Litvak, V., Maisonnave, E.B., Koukharsky, M., 2004. The
Sierra de Macon, plutonic expression of the Ordovician magmatic arc, Salta
Province Argentina. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 16, 587e597.
Rickwood, P.C., 1989. Boundary lines within petrologic diagrams which use oxides
of major and minor elements. Lithos 22, 247e264.
Roberts, M.P., Clemens, J.D., 1993. The origin of high-K, calc alkaline, I-type granitoid
magmas. Geology 21, 825e828.
Santos, E.J., Van Schmus, W.R., Kozuch, M., Brito Neves, B.B., 2010. The Cariris Velhos
tectonic event in Northeast Brazil. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 29, 61e76.
Santos, R.A., Menezes Filho, N.R., Souza, J.D., 1988. Programa Levantamentos
sicos. In: carta geolo
gica, carta metalogene
tica e previsional, 4 vols, 1:
Ba
100.000, Projeto Carira. DNPM/CPRM.
Santos, T.J.S., Fetter, A.H., Hackspacher, P.C., Van Schmus, W.R., Nogueira Neto, J.A.,
2008. Neoproterozoic tectonic and magmatic episodes in the NW sector of the
Borborema Province, NE Brazil, during assembly of western Gondwana. J. South
Am. Earth Sci. 25, 271e284.
Searle, M.P., Simpson, R.L., Law, R.D., Parrish, R.R., Waters, D.J., 2003. The structural
geometry, metamorphic and magmatic evolution of the Everest massif, High
Himalaya of Nepal-South Tibet. J. Geol. Soc. 160, 345e366.
Searle, M.P., Szulc, A.G., 2005. Channel ow and ductile extrusion of the high Himalayan slab-the KangchenjungaeDarjeeling prole, Sikkim Himalayaq.
J. Asian Earth Sci. 25, 173e185.
Silva Filho, A.F., Guimar~
aes, I.P., Lyra de Brito, M.F., Pimentel, M.M., 1997.
Geochemical signatures of main Neoproterozoic late-tectonic granitoids from
the Proterozoic Sergipano Belt, Brazil: signicance for the Brasiliano orogeny.
Int. Geol. Rev. 39, 639e659.
~es, I.P., Van Schumus, W.R., 2002. Crustal evolution of the
Silva Filho, A.F., Guimara
Pernambuco-Alagoas Complex, Borborema Province, NE-Brazil: Nd isotopic
data from neoproterozoic granitoids. Gondwana Res. 5, 409e422.
~es, I.P., 2000. High-K calc-alkaline
Silva Filho, A.F., Van Schmus, W.R., Guimara
granitoids of ca. 1 Ga TDM along the limit PE-AL massif/Sergipano Fold Belt,
^ncias 30, 182e185.
NE Brazil and their geotectonic signicance. Rev. Bras. Geocie
Smith, J.B., Barley, M.E., Groves, D.I., Krapez, B., Bickle, M.J., Chapman, H.J., 1998. The
Sholl Shear zone, West Pilbara: evidence for a terrene boundary from integrated
tectonics analyses, SHRIMP, U-Pb age-dating and granitoid geochemistry. Precambrian Res. 88, 143e171.
Sun, S.-S., McDonough, W.F., 1989. Chemical and isotope systematics of oceanic
basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. In: Saunders, A.D.,
Norry, M.J. (Eds.), Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, vol. 42. Geological Society,
London, pp. 313e345. Special Publications.
Swain, G., Barovich, K., Hand, M., Ferris, G., Schwarz, M., 2008. Petrogenesis of the St
Peter Suite, southern Australia, Arc magmatism and Proterozoic crustal growth
of the South Australian Craton. Precambrian Res. 166, 283e296.
Van Schmus, W.R., Brito Neves, B.B.de, Hackspacher, P., Babinski, M., 1995. U/Pb and
Sm/Nd geochronologic studies of the Eastern Borborema Province, Northeastern Brazil: Initial conclusions. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 8, 267e288.
280
Van Schmus, W.R., Kozuch, M., Brito Neves, B.B., 2011. Precambrian history of the
Zona Transversal of the Borborema Province, NE Brazil: insights from Sm-Nd
and U-Pb geochronology. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 31, 227e252.
Wang, K.L., Chung, S.L., O'Reilly, S.Y., Sun, S.S., Shinjo, R., Chen, C.H., 2004.
Geochemical constraints for the genesis of post-collisional magmatism and the
geodynamic evolution of the northern Taiwan region. J. Petrol. 45, 975e1011.
Whalen, J.B., Percival, J.A., McNicoll, V.J., 2004. Geochemical and isotopic (NdeO)
evidence bearing on the origin of late- to post-orogenic high-K granitoid rocks
in the Western Superior Province: implications for late Archean tectonomagmatic processes. Precambrian Res. 132, 303e326.
Winter, J.D., 2001. An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice
Hall.

Age, Composition, and Source of Continental Arc - and Syn-Collision Granites of The Neoproterozoic Sergipano Belt, Southern Borborema Province, Brazil

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Age, Composition, and Source of Continental Arc - and Syn-Collision Granites of The Neoproterozoic Sergipano Belt, Southern Borborema Province, Brazil

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 257e280

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of South American Earth Sciences

Age, composition, and source of continental arc- and syn-collision

Granites are of prime importance in studies of crustal evolution

snapshots of the superimposed deformations as they freeze part of

, Vaza Barris and Esta

~o Francisco Craton, BP-Borborema Province. B. The Sergipano Belt and its

domain: 1- Angico, 2- Areias, 3- Lagoas,

occurrence with numerous micaschist xenoliths; these granites

typical I-type granites to monzogranites, occasionally with

3.1. Granites in the Macurur

schists S2 foliation. Some of the granites are massive, whereas

domain 630e618 Ma granitoids. A) Camara

boundary migration. A few mac enclaves occurs occasionaly

observations selected grains were imaged on the Scanning Electron

Sr/86Sr(i) ratio of 0.71163, Nd(t) of -5.47, and with depleted

petrogenetic model for genesis of Poo Redondo and Stios Novos

7.1.2. 630e618 Ma granites in the Macurur

and Poo Redondo-Maranco

metasediments, Pernambuco-Alagoas Massif and partially

Long et al. (2005) simple fractional crystallization is not appli~o Sa

samples of the Formosa granite that presents one Nd(t) value of

Sequence is more Ca-rich and melting of it

characteristics. In our case, the 590e570 Ma granites show

7.3. Tectonic implications

7.3.2. 630e618 Ma-old Neoproterozoic arc development in the

granites formed in the collision zone (e.g. Sergipano Belt) and

7.3.3. Generation of 590e570 Ma granites within a channel ow?

Appendix A. Data tables

Stios Novos granite

Poo Redondo granite

(continued on next page)

Major elements (wt%)

Major elements (wt%)

Major elements (wt%)

Major elements (wt%)

(continued on next page)

Major elements (wt%)

Major elements (wt%)

(continued on next page)

Stios Novos granite

^ncia centrfuga residual

Potrebbero piacerti anche