Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Boris Rankov
wittneben@nari.ee.ethz.ch
rankov@nari.ee.ethz.ch
I.
INTRODUCTION
SIGNAL MODEL
m
s
source
H Sr
uplink
Gr
H rD
support nodes
downlink
destination
uSr( )
()
vrD
1H
(N )
Sr
s
(N )
aS
aS
(N )
uSr
Gr
w( )
1
d( )
1
( N )H
vrD
aS
(1)
rD
Gr
aD
(N ) (N )
rD
w
aD
aD
d(
N aD )
Sr(1)
s( )
1
m N aS
(N )
Sr
s
(N )
aS
(1)
rD
aS
m N aD
m N r
w( )
aS
aS
Gr ,2
(N )
rD
aD
d(
d(
N aD )
eigenmodes
no transmit power allocated to the remaining downlink
eigenmodes.
We define the uplink and downlink SNR on the n-th
eigenmodes:
2 n
n 2
Pr , g (rD)
s ( ) (Sr)
( n)
=
SNR
;
D
m2
N 2w
n 2
(1)
(n)
( n)
SNRU SNRD
(2)
SNRU( ) + SNRD( ) + 1
n
n)
)C
LDAS
(4)
m2
2s +
+ 2m
2
N
r
h
Pr ,0
aD
SNRU( ) =
2s h2
2
w
N aS )
(N )
SNR LDAS = N r
B. DDAS
In the DDAS case the support nodes jointly decode
the NU = min ( N aS , N r ) received signal streams. The decoded
d( )
(N ) (N )
rD
w
(3)
Note that the factor 0.5 accounts for the 2 channel uses,
which are required for our two-hop traffic pattern. The mutual
information of stream-LDAS is a lower bound on the capacity
CLDAS of a general LDAS system. Let the uplink and downlink
CDDAS = 12 min ( CU , CD )
NU
CU = log 2 1 + SNRU(
m =1
m)
(5)
ND
N
n
CD = log 2 1 +
SNRD( )
ND
n =1
m)
))
(6)
SNRU a SNRU
a
(7)
m [1]
Sr(1)
s( )
1
Dec
r2 [1]
Enc.
m N aS
(N )
Sr
s
(N )
aS
aS
(1)
rD
Pr , g / N aD
w( )
1
d( )
1
( NaS ) ( NaS )
Pr , g / N aD rD
w
Dec
r2 [ N aS ]
Enc.
d(
N aS )
IV.
a ( p, q ) hrD ( p ) d r* hSr ( q )
LINEAR RELAYING
H Sr
w cn
Dr
H rD
Pr
Nr
2
2
2
Nr
Pr = H Sr [ k , p ] d r [ k ] 2s +m2 d r [ k ]
p =1 k =1
k =1
Nr
cn2 = Pr / Pr , g
k =1
(8)
k =1
k)
+ H rD [ p1 , k ] d r [ k ] H
k =1
*
rD
[ p2 , k ]
nn [ p1 , p2 ] = lim 1/ N r nn [ p1 , p2 ]
2
*
= Pr / Pr , g ( p1 , p2 ) + m2 E d r hrD ( p1 ) hrD
[ p2 ]
2
w
(15)
where
N aS
2
Pr = 2s E d r hSr ( p
p =1
+ 2 E d 2
m
r
(16)
x; xx = nn
s Nr
nn [ p1 , p2 ] = Pr / Pr , g 2w ( p1 , p2 ) +
Nr
(14)
( p, q ) (10)
( p, q ) a ( p, q ) )
Nr
k)
N r
(9)
Nr
( p, q ) = 1/ N r a (
The noise scaling factor follows with the desired total relay
transmit power Pr , g as
H SD [ p, q ] = H rD [ p, k ] d r* [ k ] H Sr [ k , q ] a (
(13)
N aS
H SD
1/ N r H SD [ p, q ] = a ( p, q ) + 1/ N r ( p, q )
(12)
(11)
A
Nr
Fig. 8: Asymptotic system model for N r
1.
V.
((
hSr hrD
2
m
+ 2s hSr
2
w
+ Pr , g m2 hrD
(17)
(18)
(19)
nn [ p1 , p2 ] =
(20)
+ 2m 6h ( ct ( p1 , p2 ) + C ( p2 , p1 ) )
Nr
N
( a + 1)
2s h2
m2
2
2w / Pr ,0 2s + 2
+ m
h ( N a + 1)
(24)
2h
m2
(25)
(N
hSrT hrD
a
2
s
H
Sr
(26)
where
C = G G
(23)
d r = c1
2m
2
nn = 6h 2w / Pr ,0 2s + 2
+ m ( N a + 1) I
N
+
1
)
h ( a
and ct = trace ( C )
bt = trace ( G H G )
T
d r = hrD
hSr
(21)
(22)
With (20) the equivalent noise is white and has the correlation
matrix
matrix and hSr( q ) = H Sr [:, q ] the q-th column of the uplink channel
matrix. Then the element H SD [ p, q ] of the equivalent channel
matrix in (10) is the projection of the gain vector on the
Hadamard product (element-wise multiplication) of the
respective channel vectors
( )
H SD [ p, q ] = d rH hrD
p
hSr( )
q
(27)
{( h
( p)
rD
(28)
PERFORMANCE RESULTS
20
25
Approximations
16
LDAS
18
Na=4
14
12
LinRel B
10
Na=2
8
6
Na=1
4
2
10
20
30
40
50
LinRel B
20
10
15
10
(1xNr x1)
5
60
Nr =50
20
LinRel BZF 10
20
Nr =50
6
10
Fig. 12: Comparison of the ergodic capacity of linear relaying (B) with and
without Zero Forcing.
REFERENCES
25
[1]
DDAS
20
LDAS
15
LinRel B/C
LinRel A
10
LinRel BZF
(1xNr x1)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Fig. 10: Ergodic capacity of DDAS, LDAS and linear relaying with different
60
Na=8
50
8
3dB
40
8
DDAS
30
LinRel B
LDAS
9.5dB
20
4
7dB
10
(1x100x1)
0
10
15
20
25
30
SNR [dB]
Fig. 11: Ergodic capacity of DDAS, LDAS and linear relaying (B) versus the
SNR.