Sei sulla pagina 1di 53

Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solutions

R. Dach1 , S. Schaer2 , and M. Meindl1


1 Astronomical

Institute, University of Bern

Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern


2 Federal

Office of Topography swisstopo

IGSWorkshop on GNSSBiases
Bern, Switzerland, 18.-19. January 2012

Outline
Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solutions
1. Direct comparison of the satellite clocks
2. Comparison of the submitted ISB/IFB
3. Precise Point Positioning solutions

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 2 / 34

Overview on the Contributions


Clock Solution
Systems
satell.

Analysis Center
COD

EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
IAC

AIUB

Center for Orbit


Determination in Europe,
AIUB, Switzerland
Natural Resources Canada,
Canada
European Space Operations
Center, ESA, Germany
GeoForschungsZentrum,
Germany
GRGS-CNES/CLS,
Toulouse, France
Information-Analytical
Centre, Russia

stations

GPS+GLONASS

30 sec

300 sec

GPS+GLONASS

30 sec

GPS+GLONASS

30 sec

300 sec

GPS+GLONASS

300 sec

300 sec

GPS+GLONASS

900 sec

900 sec

GPS+GLONASS

300 sec

300 sec

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 3 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

G22 in ns G12 in ns G02 in ns

Deviation from the median


1

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 4 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Deviation from the median


300

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

0
300
300
0
300
300
0
300
0

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 5 / 34

Biases in GPS/GLONASS (Clock) Processing




DCB: differential code bias


different hardware delays for
P and CCode
ISB: intersystem bias
different hardware delays for
measurements of different
GNSS
IFB: interfrequency bias
frequencydependent hardware delays for the different
GLONASSsignals

We can only extract the sum


of delays from a GPS/GLONASS
data processing.

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 6 / 34

Biases in GPS/GLONASS (Clock) Processing


The different biases are realized in different ways in the six contributing
solutions. We can extract the following biases from the (satellite) clock time
series:


ISB: intersystem bias


one common offset between all GPS and GLONASS clocks from each of
the solutions
IFB: interfrequency bias
one offset for each GLONASS clock with respect to all GPS clocks of the
solution

Note, all offsets are realized as median to be robust against outliers.

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 7 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Deviation from the median, ISB subtracted


30

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

0
30
30
0
30
30
0
30
0

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 8 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Deviation from the median, ISB+IFB subtracted


1

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 9 / 34

ISB/IFB as Extracted from Satellite Clocks

IFB in ns

50

362.6 ns 17.7 ns 12.8 ns 149.3 ns

11.2 ns
491171344.7 ns

0
50
100

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Conclusion


The ISB/IFB can be estimated from the satellite clock solutions of


different ACs.
Appling these corrections allows for a GLONASS satellite clock
combination following the same technology as for GPS.
The estimated ISB/IFB can be rather inhomogeneous if a satellite is not
included in all solutions (which has no influence on a PPPsolution).

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 10 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Deviation from the median


100
50
0
50
100
100
50
0
50
100
100
50
0
50
100
0

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 11 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Deviation from the median, ISB subtracted


30

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

0
30
30
0
30
30
0
30
0

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 12 / 34

Satellite Clock Series (Reference clock: G15)

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Deviation from the median, ISB+IFB subtracted


1

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

COD

ESA

GFZ

GRG

0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0

12

16

20

24

DOY 2011348 (hours)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 13 / 34

ISB/IFB as Extracted from Satellite Clocks

IFB in ns

50

362.6 ns 17.7 ns 12.8 ns 149.3 ns

11.2 ns
491171344.7 ns

0
50
100

IFB in ns

50

COD

EMR

13.5 ns

2.9 ns

COD

ESA

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center
2.8 ns

GRG

IAC

29.4 ns

0
50
100

AIUB

GFZ
GRG
Analysis center

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 14 / 34

ISB/IFB as Extracted from Satellite Clocks

IFB in ns

50

362.6 ns 17.7 ns 12.8 ns 149.3 ns

11.2 ns
491171344.7 ns

0
50
100

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Conclusion 2


To apply the mean ISB/IFB per satellite from the satellite clock solutions helps to
reduce the differences between the solutions.

Nevertheless, additional ISB/IFB need to be estimated from the satellite clock


solutions of different ACs to achieve the consistency level necessary for the
combination.

The problem of ISB/IFB estimation from satellites not included in all solutions is
reduced but not solved.

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 14 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Repeatability of the IFB/ISB (as they are)


10

49.2 ns

321.1 ns

158.4 ns

327.2 ns

COD
49.2 ns

ESA
331.0 ns

GFZ
159.6 ns

GRG
321.3 ns

COD
48.9 ns

ESA
323.6 ns

GFZ
158.3 ns

GRG
343.2 ns

0
10
10
0
10
10
0
10

COD

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

Station: MATE Matera, IT

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 15 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Repeatability of the IFB/ISB (as they are)


10

35.7 ns

335.6 ns

173.1 ns

331.9 ns

COD
41.6 ns

ESA
340.1 ns

GFZ
168.0 ns

GRG
329.3 ns

COD
36.8 ns

ESA
335.1 ns

GFZ
171.0 ns

GRG
353.4 ns

0
10
10
0
10
10
0
10

COD

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

Station: CONZ Concepcion, CL

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 16 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Repeatability of the IFB/ISB (unified reference)


10

49.6 ns

320.9 ns

158.8 ns

320.1 ns

COD
49.4 ns

ESA
334.5 ns

GFZ
159.7 ns

GRG
321.7 ns

COD
48.7 ns

ESA
321.6 ns

GFZ
158.4 ns

GRG
341.3 ns

0
10
10
0
10
10
0
10

COD

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

Station: MATE Matera, IT

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 17 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers

R22 in ns R12 in ns R02 in ns

Repeatability of the IFB/ISB (unified reference)


10

35.8 ns

335.1 ns

173.0 ns

332.6 ns

COD
41.6 ns

ESA
342.7 ns

GFZ
168.1 ns

GRG
327.9 ns

COD
36.8 ns

ESA
333.5 ns

GFZ
171.0 ns

GRG
352.0 ns

0
10
10
0
10
10
0
10

COD

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

Station: CONZ Concepcion, CL

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 18 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Conclusion


The IFB/ISB series from daily independent solutions need to be unitfied regarding
their reference.

The stability of the IFB with unified reference depend on the stability of the
differences between the IFB between two satellites from the day to day in the
original series.

In the best cases we achieve a peak-to-peak stability of 2 to 3 ns.

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 19 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


ISB characteristic of the receivers
500

ISB in ns

400

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

300
200
100
0
100

Analyse centrum: COD

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 20 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


ISB characteristic of the receivers
300
200

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

100
0
100
200
300
400

Analyse centrum: GFZ

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 20 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


ISB characteristic of the receivers
100
0

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

100
200
300
400
500
600

Analyse centrum: ESA

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 20 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


ISB characteristic of the receivers
300
200

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

100
0
100
200
300
400

Analyse centrum: GRG

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 20 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
180

ISB in ns

190

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

200

210

220

230

Analyse centrum: CODGFZ

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 21 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
350

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

360

370

380

390

Analyse centrum: CODESA

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 21 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
140

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

150

160

170

180

Analyse centrum: GFZESA

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 21 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
240
260
280

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440

Analyse centrum: CODGRG

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 21 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
20
40
60

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220

Analyse centrum: GFZGRG

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 21 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
140
120
100

ASHTECH Z18
JPS E_GGD
NOV OEMV3
TPS NETG3A
TRIMBLE NETR8

JAVAD TRE_G3T DELTA


JPS LEGACY
TPS E_GGD
TPS NETG3
TRIMBLE NETR9

JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA


LEICA GRX1200+GNSS
TPS GB1000
TPS ODYSSEY_E

JPS EGGDT
LEICA GRX1200GGPRO
TPS LEGACY
TRIMBLE NETR5

ISB in ns

80
60
40
20
0
20
40
60

Analyse centrum: ESAGRG

AIUB

Stations
Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 21 / 34

IFB/ISB Computed by the Analysis Centers


Differences between ISB characteristic of the receivers
Difference
COD GFZ
COD ESA
GFZ ESA
COD GRG
GFZ GRG
ESA GRG


Num. of
Stations
52
39
36
50
46
34

Mean
in ns
210.6
377.5
167.7
371.9
162.1
6.1

Median
in ns
209.4
377.6
168.2
372.2
163.0
5.8

RMS
in ns
4.9
5.1
6.1
18.7
19.2
20.6

High consistency (low RMS) with a proper IFBhandling


(enough weight for the code measurements?)
Test whether the ACs select the same type of code observations
(CODE differs from ESA and GFZ)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 22 / 34

Number of Satellites in the Solutions

Number of sat.

Number of sat.

Number of satellites per system


32

GPS

24
16
8
0
32

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

24
16
8
0

AIUB

COD

EMR

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 23 / 34

RMS of Orbitfit using Bernese Software


Mean over all satellites of each system
Mean in mm

10

0
10

Mean in mm

GPS

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

AIUB

COD

EMR

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 23 / 34

RMS of Orbitfit using Bernese Software

Median in mm

Median in mm

Median from all satellites of each system


10

GPS

0
10

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

AIUB

COD

EMR

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 23 / 34

Comparison in the PPPPerformance


How the following Solutions Have Been Generated?
1. Data import and screening
(a) if highrate satellite clock corrections are available:
Phasedata are screened based on PPP with a sophisticated algorithm
before the first PPPsolution using postfit residual screening.
(b) without highrate satellite clock corrections:
Only the consistency between code and phasedata is checked before the
first PPPsolution using postfit residual screening.

2. static PPP using GPS/GLONASS data


assuming satellitespecific intersystem/interfrequency code biases without
ambiguity resolution for the phase data

3. pseudokinematic PPP using GPS/GLONASS data


(same as above)

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 24 / 34

Statistics of the PPP Solution (after screening)


Number of code measurements (300 sec. sampling)
Code observ.

3000
2000
1000
0
3000

Code observ.

GPS

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

2000
1000
0

COD

EMR

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 25 / 34

Statistics of the PPP Solution (after screening)

Phase observ.

Phase observ.

Number of phase measurements (300 sec. sampling)


3000

GPS

2000
1000
0
3000

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

2000
1000
0

COD

EMR

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 25 / 34

Statistics of the PPP Solution (after screening)


Number of ambiguity parameters
Ambiguities

200

100

0
200

Ambiguities

GPS

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

100

COD

EMR

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 25 / 34

Statistics of the PPP Solution (after screening)


A posteriori unit of weight
RMS in mm

0
2

RMS in mm

GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock

COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock

IAC

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 26 / 34

Coordinate Comparison from PPP Solutions

North in mm

North in mm

Coordinate difference to IGS08.SNX


15
10 GPS
5
0
5
10
15
15
COD
10 GLONASS
5
0
5
10
15

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 27 / 34

Coordinate Comparison from PPP Solutions

North in mm

North in mm

Coordinate difference to IGS08.SNX


15
10 GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock
5
0
5
10
15
15
COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
10 GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock
5
0
5
10
15

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 27 / 34

Coordinate Comparison from PPP Solutions

East in mm

East in mm

Coordinate difference to IGS08.SNX


15
10 GPS
5
0
5
10
15
15
COD
10 GLONASS
5
0
5
10
15

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 28 / 34

Coordinate Comparison from PPP Solutions

East in mm

East in mm

Coordinate difference to IGS08.SNX


15
10 GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock
5
0
5
10
15
15
COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
10 GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock
5
0
5
10
15

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 28 / 34

Coordinate Comparison from PPP Solutions

Up in mm

Up in mm

Coordinate difference to IGS08.SNX


30
20 GPS
10
0
10
20
30
30
COD
20 GLONASS
10
0
10
20
30

COD

EMR

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 29 / 34

Coordinate Comparison from PPP Solutions

Up in mm

Up in mm

Coordinate difference to IGS08.SNX


30
20 GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock
10
0
10
20
30
30
COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
20 GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock
10
0
10
20
30

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 29 / 34

PseudoKinematic PPP Solutions


RMS of the differences w.r.t. the static solutions
North in mm

20

10

0
20

North in mm

GPS

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

10

COD

EMR

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 30 / 34

PseudoKinematic PPP Solutions


RMS of the differences w.r.t. the static solutions
North in mm

20

10

0
20

North in mm

GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock

COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock

IAC

10

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 30 / 34

PseudoKinematic PPP Solutions


RMS of the differences w.r.t. the static solutions
East in mm

20

10

0
20

East in mm

GPS

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

10

COD

EMR

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 31 / 34

PseudoKinematic PPP Solutions


RMS of the differences w.r.t. the static solutions
East in mm

20

10

0
20

East in mm

GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock

COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock

IAC

10

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 31 / 34

PseudoKinematic PPP Solutions

Up in mm

RMS of the differences w.r.t. the static solutions


40
20
0

Up in mm

GPS

40

COD
EMR
GLONASS

ESA

GFZ

GRG

IAC

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

20
0

COD

EMR

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 32 / 34

PseudoKinematic PPP Solutions

Up in mm

RMS of the differences w.r.t. the static solutions


40
20
0

Up in mm

GPS/GLONASS with common receiver clock

40

COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock

IAC

20
0

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 32 / 34

GLONASS: InterfrequencyBiases
IFB as they are estimated in the static PPPsolution
IFB in ns

15
10
5
0
5
10
15

IFB in ns

GLONASSonly

10

COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock

IAC

5
0
5
10

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: ONSA Onsala, SE

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 33 / 34

GLONASS: InterfrequencyBiases
IFB as they are estimated in the static PPPsolution
IFB in ns

15
10
5
0
5
10
15

IFB in ns

GLONASSonly

10

COD
EMR
ESA
GFZ
GRG
GPS/GLONASS with independent receiver clock

IAC

5
0
5
10

COD

EMR

ESA
GFZ
Analysis center

GRG

IAC

Station: MATE Matera, IT

AIUB

Dach, Schaer and Meindl: Comparison of GPS/GLONASS Clock Solution 34 / 34

Potrebbero piacerti anche