Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
silverj6@mchsi.com
Silver J. H. Jones
Silver J. H. Jones
2008
Copyright © 2002 by Silver (J. H.) Jones. All rights, electronic, multimedia, and print, reserved. A publi-
cation of SSPEN - Systemic Symbiotic Planetary Ecovillage Network.
Eschatology is a fascinating subject, but since eschatology is a word that is not well know in common
language usage, let us begin by defining it within the context of our discussion. Because most of the tradi-
tional religions are monocausal, proposing that God controls all events, eschatology traditionally refers to
the end times or final event. However from a multicausal perspective, eschatology would refer to the po-
tentiality for multiple pathways within an final universal attractor basin, and entelechy would refer to the
emergent and actualized history culminating in the final event. Every day when you wake up you can
imagine yourself doing many different things. Going to work, going to the beach, visiting with a friend,
going to a movie, or staying home and reading a book. By the end of the day you will have made deci-
sions that will reduce this set of possible behaviors to a smaller set of actual behaviors - entelechy. The
behaviors you chose not to actualize, remain in a kind of virtual state, and the behaviors you chose to ac-
tualize are now a part of your actual history. Eschatology is important in philosophy, cosmology, spiritual-
ity, and information processing because it addresses all the potential alternative behaviors in complex sys-
tems which exhibit multicausal behavior and have multiple choice decision trees. At any given point in
time a system is presented with alternative bifurcation pathways in the larger phase, state, or configura-
tion space. The system is forced to select between a number of alternative pathways or flows. The path-
way that is chosen is actualized (entelechy), and in the process the pathways or flows which were not
chosen remain a part of the overall phase, state, or configuration space, but they are excluded from the
systems actual history. The actual history is always a subset of the potential pathways open to the system
prior to passing though a decision tree sequence. The process of universal evolution continually requires
us to move from potential behaviors to actual behaviors, and as we do this we move from eschatology to
entelechy. Entelechy addresses the narrower subset or field of actualized behaviors.
In order for us to exist as free will creatures, the universe must be multicausal rather than mono-
causal. If the universe were monocausal and completely controlled by differential equations, we would be
nothing more than automatons, proceeding down predetermined pathways, determined from the outset of
the universe by the combination of initial conditions and boundary conditions. In such a universe, design
level intelligence would be in complete control of our future. Our destiny would have been locked in and
inevitable from the beginning of the universe. This is not the universe we live in. We live in a universe of
choice, and with the exercise of these degrees of freedom, we cocreate and actualize the universe in con-
cert with design intelligence, which has granted us this birthright. Design level intelligence has designed
the universe in such a manner that we have to do more than just pass through the process, we have to
actively become an integral part of the process.
The universe is a complex, dynamical, information processing system which is pregnant with multihierar-
chical, multiheterarchical, and multicausal decision trees, which force us to transform the universe from a
potentiality into an actuality. We refer to this process as evolution, but this terminology may be a little
misleading. As we make choices, we narrow the decision tree with each new choice we make. From the
eschatological (potential) perspective this is a devolution, it is only evolutionary from the entelechy (actu-
alization) perspective. Each actualized choice narrows the total decision tree of the entire phase/state/
configuration universe space. Simultaneously it leads us to the next decision tree, in a now smaller total
decision space. When the universe cycle has reached the omega point in the universal attractor basin, we
will have chosen a particular subset of pathways or flows into the universal attractor basin. The other
pathways still remain within the universal attractor basin as virtual pathways unexplored by our unique