Notice of Claim of Immunity From Extradition

DATE: ______________

TO: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. for Niagara Falls, Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada
CC: To whom it may concern,
Hello and Good day! I am _____________________________ and I am writing in regards to my right
to claim immunity from extradition. Although I am not to my knowledge presently under any sort of
investigation, nor do I expect to be, I am taking this step because it is my right, and I wish for others,
specifically Marc Emery, to be aware that they too have this right. I realize you have a difficult job, but
I am also aware that you sought this job of your own volition, and have accepted certain duties.
Amongst them is recognizing and respecting the rights of the people of Canada and it is my belief that
we are not your chattel, cattle or property that may be surrendered as one would a soldier or property.

It is clear to me that according to the Criminal Code of Canada, the Extradition Act and the
Constitution Act, any one in Canada may claim immunity from extradition by way of the common law
unless they are subject of a request by the UN. I also noticed that the United States is not listed as a
partner as defined in the Extradition Act and yet I am aware that Marc Emery is awaiting surrender to
the United States under that Act. All these discrepancies cause more than a little concern, and in order
to ensure I and others do not suffer the same politically motivated fate and injustice as Marc Emery, I
am hereby claiming immunity from extradition effective immediately and permanently. It is also my
position, that since equality is paramount under the law, then no one has the power to dispute my claim
of immunity without claiming I am their property or their chattel. Here is the key section of the
Extradition Act which highlights our ability to do these things:

No immunity
6.1 Despite any other Act or law, no person who is the subject of a request for surrender
by the International Criminal Court or by any international criminal tribunal that is
established by resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations and whose
name appears in the schedule, may claim immunity under common law or by statute
from arrest or extradition under this Act.
Another less deceptive and ambiguous way of saying the same thing is this: Anyone can claim
immunity from extradition under the common law or statute unless they are the subject of a request for
surrender by the International Criminal Court or by any international criminal tribunal that is
established by resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations and whose name appears in the
schedule.

As human beings, we are not the property of others that can be surrendered like cattle. The people who
craft these words know that and within them there is remedy. It is easy to see how they are deceptive
too. This section is titled No immunity, yet when you look at what it says, and count the people who
can claim immunity versus those who cannot you quickly see that the latter group is far smaller.
Should it not then be called Immunity? By labelling it as 'No immunity' they are relying on a form of
neural linguistic programming which in conjunction with your previous programming received in
school will cause you to automatically start thinking in the negative sense, and will then fail to see the
positive aspects which are the remedy. The other tool used in the neural programming sense is the
intentional creation of confusion caused by taking two ideas, and inserting one inside the other,
breaking up the important one. In this case we see two concepts. The first is the common law right to
claim immunity and how it applies to everyone with a few exceptions. The other is those exceptions.
By taking the exceptions and using it to break up the first idea inserting it as they have right smack-dab
in the middle, they have attempted to break apart and hide the key truth with the less important one.

In any event, it is obvious to me that I like Marc Emery have the right to claim immunity from
Extradition and it is my hope that he along with thousands of others will make the same claims.

Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill will, vexation or frivolity,

I AM

_______________________________

WITNESS:

_______________________________