Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
00
$2.00 US
$3.00 CAN
Winter 2007
JOURNAL OF
BIOMEDICAL THERAPY
Integrating
Homotoxicology
and Mainstream
Medicine
Homotoxicology In Brief
Biological pain relief medicine for
the locomotor system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Medical Studies
Mucosal inflammation syndrome in
allergic disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Medical Summaries
Antiviral activity of Engystol: an in
vitro analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
A complex homeopathic preparation for
the symptomatic treatment of upper
respiratory infections associated with the
common cold: an observational study . . . . 9
Case Study
Gentle alternative to NSAIDs
........
In Your Practice
Practical detoxification and drainage
10
..
11
www.heel.ca (Canada)
or
www.heelusa.com (USA)
Looking for a past issue?
Click on the archive section of
the Canadian website!
CIRCULATION: 11,145
Made and printed in Canada
RETURN ADDRESS:
11025 L.H. Lafontaine
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H1J 2Z4
Winter 2007
To reach us,
log on to our website:
If you wish to
download this issue,
visit our website at
Dr. Alta Smit is a physiotherapist, medical doctor and homeopath, who is particularly interested in the
regulation therapy of modern immune diseases and metabolic diseases, as they are overlapping so rapidly.
J O U R N A L O F B I O M E D I CA L T H E R A P Y
SUMMARY EDITORIAL
Homotoxicology
IN BRIEF
Winter 2007
Mucosal inflammation
syndrome in allergic disease
INTRODUCTION
Medical
STUDY
It is common to find allergic patients with simultaneous clinical signs or symptoms of the respiratory and/or gastrointestinal and/or
genitourinary mucosal membranes. In the present study the common denominator was allergic rhinitis. Simultaneous clinical
involvement, circumscribed to the aforementioned mucosal tissues (mucosae) clearly suggests common physiopathological factors
in allergic disease; accordingly, alterations of one type of membrane affect the others, or alterations of two or more mucosae may be
explained on the basis of a common mechanism.
Hypothesis. Allergic disease can give rise to simultaneous clinical manifestations of the respiratory, gastrointestinal and genitourinary
mucosal membranes.
Objective. To determine whether allergic disease can give rise to simultaneous clinical manifestations of these mucosae.
Summary. Patients who have allergies can have simultaneous respiratory, digestive and genitourinary mucosal disease. I performed
a retrospective study in 30 patients; 24 children and 6 women. The children were between 5 and 9 years old, and the women were
between 26 to 40 years old. All of them suffer from allergic diseases.
Results. 100% had clinical respiratory diseases like rhinitis, asthma, arithenoids or vocal cord inflammation, tonsillectomy, and/or
frequent respiratory viral infections. 100% of the patients had clinical digestive diseases such as gastro-esophageal reflux, gastroduodenitis, constipation and diarrhea. 87% of the female patients had clinical genitourinary diseases such as vulvovaginitis and
urinary infections.
The results of this study are very important because they provide information regarding the clinical behaviour of allergic diseases,
which can be systemic. According to this concept, its treatment should be holistic and individual because each patient can have
one or more mucosae involved. The most recent articles of medical literature refer to rhinitis and asthma only as a like process.
Recurrent acute viral respiratory infection (ARI) was diagnosed when the patient suffered one or more infections a month.
Clinical gastritis in turn was defined by clinical signs of acute gastritis the latter being established by acute epigastric pain accompanied
or not by vomiting and relief following antacid administration.
Chronic cough was defined as cough persisting for more than 20 days in different episodes, with a cause not different from allergy
of the upper airways.
Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in turn was diagnosed by gammagraphy or a history of chronic vomiting in a child, or in the
case of adults chronic heartburn.
Arytenoiditis and inflammation of the vocal cords was accepted when laryngoscopy confirmed inflammation of these structures.
Esophago- and/or gastro- and/or duodenitis were diagnosed in the presence of endoscopic and histological findings corresponding
to such disorders.
Winter 2007
Asthmatic patients in turn were defined as those with two or more asthmatic episodes a year on average, in the previous three years,
with frequent beta-2-adrenergic and/or inhalatory steroid use.
Medical
STUDY
Digestive
alterations
Genitourinary
alterations
(in women)
Chronic diarrhea was defined as two or more daily depositions, with diarrheic consistency on one or more occasions all with
colic type abdominal pain.
Constipation was defined as an absence of bowel movement for over 48 hours, with hard stools and a large fecal bolus.
Vulvovaginitis was described as an episode of vaginal secretion, itching or inflammation of the skin of the vulva and vaginal
mucosa.
Urinary infection in turn was considered for those patients presenting at least one episode of clinical signs and symptoms of urinary
infection and positive urine culture for a microorganism known to cause such disorders (bacterial count: 100,000 CFUs or more).
Likewise, 100% had clinical manifestations of the gastrointestinal mucosa. These manifestations may or may not correspond to
allergic physiopathological processes of the membranes. Many of these patients presented clinical signs and symptoms of gastritis
in the presence of acute respiratory infection (ARI); 5 of them presented gastric ulcer as established at endoscopy, coinciding with
an acute episode of viral respiratory infection.
On the other hand, 61.9% of the female patients, regardless of age, showed clinical alterations of these mucosae, manifesting as
vulvovaginitis and/or urinary infection.
CONCLUSION
Winter 2007
The selected allergic patients with clinical manifestations of the respiratory tract were seen to possibly present simultaneous alterations
of the gastrointestinal and/or genitourinary mucosal membranes.
DISCUSSION
The following syndromic manifestations simultaneously affect the mucosal membranes of the respiratory and/or gastrointestinal
and/or genitourinary tracts, and partially or completely confirm the different clinical manifestations of MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION SYNDROME, as described for the first time in the present article. These observations were made in allergic outpatients
or allergic individuals admitted to hospital, and their detection merits attention and sensitivity on the part of the supervising physician.
1. Girls with sinusitis and/or allergic rhinitis and/or pharyngitis, with concomitant vaginitis. Eventual ascending urinary tract infection.
2. Nursing infant (age under 3 months) with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) (or underlying gastroenteritis) and nasal congestion
(noisy nasal breathing) this latter symptom often being observed before manifestations of GERD become apparent.
Medical
STUDY
7
The medical literature reports the partial concurrence of these manifestations:
77% of the adult asthmatic population experience symptoms of GERD.1
43% of asthmatic patients subjected to digestive tract endoscopy present esophagitis or Barretts esophagus.2
20% of children with rhinitis develop asthma.3
50% of children with asthma develop rhinitis.4
Marked association of sinusitis, asthma, laryngitis, pneumonia and bronchiectasia in patients with GERD (patients aged 2-18 years).5
Clinical association of tonsillitis and right iliac fossa pain simulating acute appendicitis (involving patients needlessly subjected
to appendectomy).6 The importance of focusing attention on the global involvement of the mucosal membranes in a given
patient is that the diagnostic and management approach should be holistic and individualized.
A lack of response to treatment on the part of pathology related to a given mucosal membrane in the context of allergic disease is seen
on a daily basis in medical practice when necessary attention is not focused on other simultaneously affected mucosal membranes. The
following may serve as examples:
1. A lack of surgical intervention to correct important adenoid hypertrophy implies frequent respiratory infections (viral, otitis,
sinusitis).
3. Acute respiratory infections and the presence of GERD (or underlying gastroenteritis).
Winter 2007
2. Torpid course of asthma in patients with uncontrolled GERD (or underlying gastroenteritis).
Medical
STUDY
As an example, an ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialist could not treat rhinitis if the intestinal alterations are not first dealt with.
Gynecologists or urologists likewise would not be able to treat a large percentage of cases of vulvovaginitis and urinary tract infections
without first treating the respiratory allergies and intestinal disorders. In turn, pneumologists would not diagnose gastritis if not
intentionally explored. The same considerations apply to the other medical specialties that deal with allergic processes.
This clinical approach involving physiopathological dependency of the mucosae in allergic disease would fully reorientate the current
treatment established by conventional medicine; each mucosal membrane deals with somewhat different immunological information,
though with crossed immune data among different membranes. As an example, a food allergen can produce digestive tract and
respiratory symptoms at the same time.7
Food allergies can coincide with allergy produced by aeroallergens in up to 70% of cases8, which increases the possibility of crossreactions between foods with aeroallergens. This data implicates the intestine as an important antigen generating source a fact that
must be taken into account when treating an allergic patient, regardless of where the allergic process manifests. It is our experience
that once a patient starts a correct diet, with good intestinal hygiene and environmental control, allergic processes largely disappear.
Another mistake in medical practice is to consider these symptoms as a disease. Such manifestations are actually symptoms or signs
of allergic disease, and the correct diagnosis of an allergic patient should be based on the following premises: allergic disease with
manifestations of esophagitis, gastritis, rhinitis, asthma, vulvovaginitis, etc. The practice of considering an organ isolatedly from the
rest of the organism fails to take into account that the mucosal membranes share immunological information, and that alterations
of one membrane can affect others.
Lastly, another aspect that deserves mention on the basis of the findings of the present study is that ascending urinary tract infection
and vulvovaginitis may be related to alterations of nearby mucosal membranes such as constipation or allergic enteropathy or
more distant mucosae, such as in the case of allergic rhinosinusitis. A number of studies already mention allergic disease as a cause
of vulvovaginitis9, and even establish a relation to dust mite allergy.10 In my opinion, this problem is very common, though the
medical literature does not yet report the situation as such.
It is hoped that the present study may serve as motivation for investigators to clarify the prevalence of this syndrome in allergic
disease, to establish a new definition for the latter, and to explore the association between allergic pathology and other mucosal
disorders such as GERD in the adult, vesicoureteral reflux, interstitial cystitis in the adult, constipation and endometriosis.
As a general conclusion, I am of the opinion that a clinical syndrome exists in allergic disease, which from the physiopathological
perspective may partially or fully implicate the respiratory, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts, and that the medical literature has not yet recognized its relevance.
The scientific bases explaining the physiopathology of mucosal inflammation syndrome in allergic disease are based on the new
concept of modern psycho-neuro-endocrino-immunology, which we hope to develop in the following issue pending publication.
The latest publications referring to allergies only view rhinitis and asthma as manifestations of one same process. The corroboration
by other investigators of the simultaneous involvement of the mucosal membranes in the allergic patient would help confirm a
new definition of allergic disease, and thus also promote a new approach to management.
REFERENCES
1. Field SK, Underwood M, Brant R, Cowie RL: Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma. Chest 1996;109:31622.
2. Sontag SJ, Schnell TG, Miller TQ, Khandelwal S, OConnell S, Chejfec G, et al.: Prevalence of oesophagitis in asthmatics. Gut. 1992;33:8726.
3. Linna O, Kokkonen J, Lukin M. A ten years prognosis for childhood allergic rhinitis. Acta paediatr. 1992;81:100-2.
4. Martinez FD, Wright AL, Taussig LM, Holberg CJ, Halonen M, Morgan WJ. Asthma and wheezing in the first six years of life. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:133-8.
5. El-Serag HB, Gilger M, Kuebeler M, Rabeneck L. Extraesophageal associations of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children without neurologic defects. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1294-9.
6. Lessin M, Manesh A, et al. Tonsil Tummy Tumult. Clinical Pediatrics. 2002;41:125-6.
7. Bjornsson E, Janson C, Plaschke P, Norrman E, Sjberg O. Prevalence of sensitization to food allergens in adult Swedes. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;77:327-32.
8. Schfer T, Bhler E, Ruhdorfer S, Weigl L, Wessner D, Heinrich J, Filipiak B, Wichmann H.-E, Ring J. Epidemiology of food allergy/food intolerance in adults: associations with other
manifestations of atopy. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2001;56:1172-9.
9. Haefner, H. Current evaluation and management of vulvovaginitis. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;42:184-95.
Winter 2007
10. Moraes PSA. Allergic vulvovaginitis induced by house mites: A case report. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 1998;101(4):557-8.
Medical
SUMMARIES
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
Background: The use of complementary medicines is large and growing in both the
United States and Europe.
Objective: To compare the effects of a complex homeopathic preparation (Engystol; Heel
GmbH, Baden-Baden, Germany) with those of conventional therapies with antihistamines, antitussives, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on upper respiratory
symptoms of the common cold in a setting closely related to everyday clinical practice.
Design: Nonrandomized, observational study over a treatment period of maximally two weeks.
Setting: Eighty-five general and homeopathic practices in Germany.
Main outcome measures: The effects of treatment were evaluated on the variables fatigue, sensation of illness,
chill/tremor, aching joints, overall severity of illness, sum of all clinical variables, temperature and time to symptomatic improvement.
Results: Both treatment regimens provided significant symptomatic relief, and the homeopathic treatment was
noninferior in a noninferiority analysis. Significantly more patients (P <0.05) using Engystol-based therapy
reported improvement within 3 days (77.1% vs. 61.7% for the control group). No adverse events were reported
in any of the treatment groups.
Conclusion: This homeopathic treatment may be a useful component of an integrated symptomatic therapy for
the common cold in patients and practitioners choosing an integrative approach to medical care.
Interventions: Engystol-based therapy or common over-the-counter treatments for the common cold. Patients
receiving this homeopathic treatment were allowed other short-term medications, but long-term use of analgesics,
antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents was not permitted. Patients were allowed non-pharmacological therapies
such as vitamins, thermotherapies and others.
Winter 2007
Participants: Three hundred ninety-seven patients with upper respiratory symptoms of the common cold.
Case
STUDY
Gentle alternative
to NSAIDs
Hip surgery avoided
While experts had previously assumed there were five million arthrosis sufferers in Germany, a study published in
October 2005 estimates that about 30 million people in the Federal Republic of Germany have arthrosis. A survey conducted among 3,360 citizens of Herne over a period of 40 years had revealed that well over half of the surveyed sample
(57 percent) suffered from acute joint disorders. 68 percent had to cope with pain during the previous month and 71
percent in the previous year. Although elderly persons are more affected, the number of young people with cartilage
damage is also considerable. The Herne arthrosis study revealed that 52.3 percent of 40 to 49-year-olds were suffering
from joint pain. Other surveys suggest that four percent of 20-year-olds are affected. A treatment capable of reversing
cartilage wear is not in prospect. Despite considerable advances in the field of artificial joints, this solution must continue to be regarded as the last resort and an option that should be delayed as long as possible, at least in younger
patients. The main aim of arthrosis treatment is therefore to relieve the pain. Another important aim is to preserve the
mobility of the joint and halt or at least delay the progression of the cartilage damage. A wide range of products are
available for the treatment of arthrosis-induced pain, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) accounting
for the great majority of medical prescriptions. However, NSAIDs can have undesirable effects, especially in the gastrointestinal tract, making the use of these medications over prolonged periods a problem. This also applies to the newer
COX-2 inhibitors. Alternatives offering a more favorable side effect profile are therefore of great importance for the
treatment of arthrosis.
As an example of an alternative therapeutic option, general practitioner Christian W. Engelbert describes the case of a now
47-year-old office worker who attended his practice with severe hip pain in 1997. This patient, who engaged in sports
and was a keen tennis player, had been suffering from recurrent back pain for 25 years. Chronic complaints in the right
hip had worsened considerably in April 1997. Pain was present both at rest and during movement, but especially during
sporting activity, and competitive sport was no longer possible. NSAIDs (diclofenac up to 150 mg/day) and other analgesics
(paracetamol, aspirin, etc.) were insufficiently effective. Furthermore, NSAIDs gave rise to upper abdominal complaints and
heartburn. The X-ray taken by the orthopedist consulted revealed severe right-sided coxarthrosis and incipient arthrotic
lesions in the left hip. This specialist recommended, the then 39-year-old, a high-dose NSAID treatment and a total hip
replacement. A date for surgery was scheduled.
10
Winter 2007
In searching for an alternative therapeutic option, the patient finally consulted the general practitioner who used complementary medical methods. Besides a limping gait, Engelbert diagnosed atrophy of the gluteal and femoral muscles.
Trendelenburgs sign, Duchennes sign and Drehmanns sign were positive, and mobility of internal and external rotation was impaired. Trigger points were identified on the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and piriform muscles. The
spinal extensor muscles showed indurations and myogeloses. The general practitioner immediately initiated treatment
with periarticular injection of the homeopathic combination preparation Zeel comp. N (2 ampoules twice weekly over 6
weeks). He also administered Zeel tablets orally (3 tablets twice daily over 2 weeks). The treatment was supplemented
by five sessions of ear acupuncture. During the course of therapy, Engelbert injected the homeopathic preparation at the
trigger points and at regional acupuncture points like Gallbladder 30. Additional distal point injections of Zeel and
Traumeel S were given at various points (Bladder 40, Gallbladder 35, and Bladder 60) once weekly over 4 weeks. After
6 weeks, the treatment was reduced to 3 tablets of Zeel comp. N daily.
Pain relief was experienced 2 weeks after the start of therapy, and an improvement in the gait pattern was observed after
4 weeks. After 8 weeks, the patient was again capable of completing longer training sessions (tennis). In summer 1997,
the passionate tennis player was again winning the first league games with his team. Directly following the acute treatment, the patient continued taking Zeel comp. N tablets orally. He also received several series of Zeel injections. The
treatment was rounded off with muscle building training and relaxation exercises and an annual series of 10 sessions of
body acupuncture.
The patient still practices sports today and plays league games on a tennis team. His hip mobility is slightly restricted.
The impairment of internal and external rotation has increased slightly in the last 9 years. The patient is pain-free and
there is no muscle atrophy. A radiographic examination in 2006 revealed a slight increase in the signs of arthrosis.
The treating physician sums up this case as follows: despite an indication for total right hip replacement diagnosed by
2 orthopedists, an alternative therapeutic approach based on the homeopathic combination preparation Zeel comp. N
(long-term oral administration and injection) has made it possible to avoid surgical intervention to the present day without
the patient experiencing any impairment of his sporting performance.
Practical detoxification
and drainage
In Your
PRACTICE
Exposure
Absorption at the
portals of entry
11
Metabolism to more
toxic metabolites
Metabolism to more
toxic metabolites
Excretion
Metabolism to more
toxic metabolites
Turnover
and repair
Some toxins can be endocrine disruptors, cause immune dysfunction and, in the worst scenario, act as carcinogenic substances.
Due to the wide distribution of toxins in the environment, our fast lifestyle with modern malnutrition and toxic food,
as well as the increase in psychological stress (which secretes hormones that can influence the detoxification process),
the need for detoxification and drainage exists in every patient.
To understand how to go about detoxification, we need to address how toxins enter and leave the body. Basically toxins
need to diffuse over several membranes, to reach different compartments when they enter the body, and must go
through those compartments once again when they exit the body (see Figure 2).
It should be clear from the above that toxins stored in the body or toxins which are not eliminated will be detrimental
for various reasons. Toxins can have a wide range of effects, such as fatigue, brain fog, concentration loss, but also other
manifestations such as the so-called chloracne which is caused by halogenated toxins.
Winter 2007
In Your
PRACTICE
FIGURE 2
Environment
Interstitial fluid
Mucosa
or skin
Intracellular fluid
Plasma
Capillary
membrane
Interstitial fluid
Capillary
membrane
Target cell
membrane
Intra-organelle fluid
(mitochondria, liposome, nucleus)
Sub-cellular
organelle membrane
Most toxins reach the compartments by passive diffusion over semipermeable membranes. This means that the concentration
of the toxin will be equal on both sides of the membrane, if the toxin is not bound to certain structures. Toxins are
carried from the point of absorption to the organs of elimination and metabolization, in the blood, and therefore it
means that our therapeutic goal is to reduce the concentration of toxins in the blood so that the toxins can start to diffuse
back into the bloodstream from the storage compartments. For this reason, we put the patient on a nontoxic diet, give
a lot of fluids during the detoxification period, and also proactively stop the supply of toxins, such as inhalants, alcohol
and other toxins. In other cases, the toxins are bound to proteins and also to SH groups in the cell and in the matrix.
We often then have to stimulate the release of the toxin from these molecules. This is an active process and needs support.
12
Winter 2007
To get the body to free itself of toxins, we need to support the organs which metabolize harmful substances, support the
function of the organs which store toxins (such as the matrix) and lastly we also have to stimulate elimination from these
organs. It is important to note that once stored toxins are released, they often have not completed their metabolism, and
therefore still need to be made water soluble in the liver before becoming excreted in the kidney and other organs.
Important to note also is the kinetics of toxins stored in the different compartments. The organs which are well perfused,
such as the internal organs, will be relatively quickly cleared of toxins, but the compartments which are poorly perfused
like the matrix, the fat tissue and bone will have a slower release. This means that there are two waves of drainage when
we start to stimulate detoxification. The practical implication is that we have to detoxify and drain until the slower compartment has been cleared as well. This can take months in very toxic patients. If the stored toxins are released too rapidly,
all at once, or if the liver and other metabolizing and eliminating organs are overloaded or not functioning properly, the
released toxins will diffuse into the blood, but cannot be excreted. They will thus circulate in the bloodstream until they
find a compartment where the concentration is less than in the blood and then diffuse into this compartment. The crux
is that in this way, toxins are merely shifted from point A to B.
This is not such a problem in well persons or patients with mild toxicity, but in patients with severe toxicity it may have
repercussions, such as heavy metals now entering the brain from where it is extremely difficult to remove them.
Especially in patients whose organs of elimination are not functioning properly or are burdened by disease or with other
toxins (such as seen in patients on chemotherapy), this needs to be considered. In these patients, we need to support the
organs of detoxification and elimination first before we actually drain the tissues.
It is also important to note that the process of detoxification and drainage puts a severe burden on the body, and thus
with very frail and sick patients it can put another burden on the body. In these patients, detoxification is often done as
a later event, when the patient has received other medications to support the body. Detoxification and drainage also
requires energy, and therefore homeopathic catalysts are a standard addition to more strenuous detoxification programs,
apart from the fact that they also play a role in cellular detoxification.
In Your
PRACTICE
PRACTICAL DETOXIFICATION
Detoxification and drainage requirements are different in different patients. Some people deal well with toxins, while others,
through genetics or illness are less well equipped to cope with toxins. The practical detoxification and drainage will be different in
various groups of patients.
The healthy person who wants to clean his tissues and optimize the drainage of toxins can detoxify more aggressively than the
person who has a special medical condition. Patients with disease processes classified on the right of the biological division (according
to the Six-Phase Table), will need a more gentle approach and a longer period of detoxification and drainage, as do patients in the
following groups:
a. The cancer patient on active treatment such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy
b. The older patient
c. The obese patient with metabolic disease
d. The patient with impairment of the elimination organs, such as the liver or the kidneys
e. The patient who had severe drug addiction in the past. It is important to get the patient history, as patients like this can
store metabolites of drugs such as LSD for years
13
The first and the last points entail the cooperation and motivation of the patient, whereas the latter needs to be given by the practitioner. We thus distinguish between medications which support the organs of detoxification and drainage, and the medications
which stimulate elimination. For each organ there is a product which will support the tissues; these are mostly compositum preparations which also contain tissue extracts and often catalysts and then there are basic preparations which are combinations of plant
materials and also minerals. These support the function of the detoxification organs and also in many cases, increase the drainage
of the toxins out of the tissues.
Galium-Heel is a medication which is sometimes given for a while before changing to Lymphomyosot. Due to the constituents of
Galium-Heel, it is believed to also cleanse the cellular structures. It is often used in patients who had a lot of suppressive treatments,
but also in patients over 40 years of age who, in general, have a higher toxin load than younger people. Galium-Heel is especially useful
in patients who are non-reactive, thus patients who do not ever mount a fever and are in TH 2 rigidity. It should be used with
caution in younger children and in patients who are very reactive as it can induce fever and a fast detoxification in these patients.
Lymphomyosot (Lyphosot) has been designed to be a drainage remedy, and should not be used initially in the case of severe toxicity,
or if the liver and kidneys are overloaded; thus, the advanced detoxification should be used first. It has several components which will
help drain the tissues of the various organs. It is thus a universal drainage remedy and can also be used in the case of disease of the
lymphoid organs. Lymphomyosot also has been studied in cases of diabetic neuropathy where it was seen to be as effective as alpha
lipoic acid infusions, which are currently the treatment of choice for diabetic polyneuropathy. The postulation was that
Lymphomyosot will drain the so-called Advanced Glycosylation End products (AGEs) in the matrix of these patients and thereby
reduce the inflammatory potential around the nerves. The actions of the various constituents of Lymphomysot are depicted in Figure 3.
Winter 2007
Berberis-Homaccord has the same effect as above, but is more functiotropic for the kidney; however, it also has an action on the liver
and gallbladder.
In Your
PRACTICE
FIGURE 3
Lymphomyosot
Lymphatic system
and the Matrix
Pinus silvestris
Scrophularia
Levothyroxinum
Calcium phosph.
Juglans regia
Ferrum jodatum
Respiratory tract
Myosotis arvensis
Teucrium
Natrium sulfuricum
Nasturtium officinale
Lymphomyosot
Urinary tract
Sarsaparilla
Equisetum
In general, Galium-Heel is then followed-up with Lymphomyosot after a period of time, generally 4 to 6 weeks. Galium-Heel and
Lymphomyosot should not be used at the same time.
14
Often, Coenzyme compositum oral vials or tablets or Ubicoenzyme drops are given together with the Detox-Kit. The catalysts are
used mainly to support the Krebs cycle, and also to detoxify the cellular structures. This makes the detoxification and drainage quite
complete. Ubicoenzyme drops may be added to the bottle of water, along with the Detox-Kit. See Figure 4 for more details on dosages.
The symptoms of detoxification and drainage can vary from patient to patient. Most patients start with a diuresis, or water loss, while
others may drain preliminarily through the gut, with slight diarrhea and loose stools. The color of the urine and stools may also
change. Some patients will use the skin and the lungs to detoxify, which manifests as tachypnea in the lung, or expectoration, and in
the skin as an increase in sweat with odor or mild rashes. If symptoms like headache with nausea and dizziness, or myalgia or arthralgia
(sore muscles or joint pain), or severe fatigue appear, it means that the detoxification and drainage should take place at a slower pace.
In this case, the patient is mobilizing toxins which are not metabolized or excreted with the result that the toxins are deposited in other
compartments, such as the brain, or the connective tissue. In these cases, it is better to give the medications consecutively, meaning
that Nux vomica-Homaccord should be used first, then Berberis-Homaccord and then only Lymphomyosot/Lyphosot. If this is very
severe, then switch to the advanced detox first for a few weeks and then again to the basic Detox-Kit.
Winter 2007
FIGURE 4
Targeted organ
Liver
Kidney
Nux vomica-Homaccord
Hepar compositum
Berberis-Homaccord
Solidago compositum or
Berberis-Homaccord
Matrix
Lymphomyosot (Lyphosot)
or Galium-Heel
Thyreoidea compositum
or Funiculus umbilicalis suis-Injeel
or Pulsatilla compositum
Cell
Coenzyme compositum
or Ubicoenzyme
Duration of use
Dosage
In Your
PRACTICE
Advanced support of
detox organs and mild
stimulation of elimination
The plant material is in a low dilution and has a homeophytotherapeutic effect, while the minerals, catalysts and organ extracts
occur in stimulatory concentrations. These concentrations are the same as in many of the bodys internal messengers such as neurotransmitters and cytokines are present. As every product is designed to target a different organ, the body will not be overloaded
since we are not actively draining in the advanced detoxification protocol. Thus, all products may be administered together at once,
in some water. With low homeopathic dilutions, it is not necessary to wait between the administration of each product. A summary
of the various medications is given in Figure 4.
15
The catalysts play a specifically important role here, and are added to detoxify cellular structures. The action of Glyoxal compositum is thought to be deeper than that of Ubichinon compositum (or Ubicoenzyme). Dr. Hans-Heinrich Reckeweg already postulated that these products have a deep cleansing effect. Glyoxal compositum is used in patients who have a severe cellular toxicity,
such as cancer patients. It is used over longer intervals, together with Ubichinon compositum and Coenzyme compositum (or
Ubicoenzyme). For instance, Glyoxal compositum can be given once per week for 6 weeks together with the other catalysts with
a break of several months in between and then used again.
Thyreoidea compositum or Funiculus umbilicalis suis-Injeel (when Thyreoidea compositum is not available) is used to activate the
matrix and Pulsatilla compositum is especially useful when a patient has been on cortisone.
REFERENCES
1. Armstrong B, et al. Lung cancer risk after exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112:940-87.
2. Ballatori N. Transport of toxic metals by molecular mimicry. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110 (suppl 5):689-94.
3. Brody JG, Rudel, A. Environmental pollutants and breast cancer. Environ Health Perspect 2002.111:1007-19.
4. Calabrese EJ and Baldwin LA. Hormesis: U-shaped dose responses and their centrality in toxicology. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2001;22(6):285-91.
5. Carson, Rachel. The silent Spring, Greenwich (Connecticut) 1962.
6. Crinnion W. Environmental medicine, Part 1: The human burden of environmental toxins and their common health effects. Altern. Med Rev 2000;5(1):52-63.
9. Harris JB and Blain PG. Neurotoxicology: what the neurologist needs to know. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:iii29-iii34.
10. Hodgson E. A textbook of modern toxicology. Third edition. Wiley Interscience 2004. ISBN 0-471-26508-X.
11. Skinner MK, et al. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005;308(5727):1466-9.
12. Rogan W and Chen A. Health and risk benefits of bis (4-cholorophenyl)-111-trichlorethane (DDT). Lancet 2005;366:763-75.
13. Poirier LA and Vlasova JT. The prospective role of abnormal methyl metabolism in cadmium toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(suppl 5):793-5.
14. Welshons WV, et al. Large effects from small exposures. Mechanisms for endocrine disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:994-1006.
15. Dietz A-R. Possibilities for a lymph therapy with diabetic polyneuropathy. Biologische Medizin 2000;29(1):4-9.
16. Bigsby RM, Caperell-Grant A and Madhukar BV. Xenobiotics released from fat during fasting produce estrogenic effects in ovariectomized mice. Cancer Research 1997;57:865-9.
8. Hartwig A, et al. Interference by toxic metal ions with a DNA repair and cell cycle control. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(suppl 5):797-9.
Winter 2007
7. Gray LE, et al. Administration of potentially antiandrogenic pesticides (procymidone, linuron, iprodione, chlozolinate, p,p'-DDE, and ketoconazole) and toxic substances (dibutyl- and diethylhexyl phthalate,
PCB 169, and ethane dimethane sulphonate) during sexual differentiation produces diverse profiles of reproductive malformations in the male rat. Toxicology and Industrial Health. 1999;15:94-118.