Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Sagar G V
August 21, 2012
What is oximetry ?
[HbO2 ]
[Hb] + [HbO2 ]
(1)
Beer-Lambert Law
the absorbent.
dI I[C]dt
where dI is the infinitesimal change in light intensity as it passes through a
sample of concentration [C] and thickness dt. Thus, for a large sample,
I = I0 e[C]t
where I0 is the intensity of the incident light and is the absorption co-efficient,
t is the thickness of the sample.
Making measurements
Light from an LED is transmitted through the human body (usually finger or
ear lobe) and the intensity of the light that passes through is measured. Well
assume that the light intensity of the LED is proportional to the current through
it and that the current in a photodiode is directly proportional to the light that
falls on it.
4.1
We shall now send light from a red LED through a finger and measure how
much light passes through. Beer-Lambert law tells us
IrxR = ItxR etissueR [tissue]l1 HbO2 R [HbO2 ]l1 HbR [Hb]l1
(2)
where symbols have their usual meaning and the R suffix indicates that
the quantity is corresponding to the red light. The absorption is divided into
absorption due to tissues, oxy haemoglobin and deoxy haemoglobin.
To obtain SpO2 , the ratio of [Hb] to [HbO2 ] is needed. Eq. 2 does not allow
us to compute this ratio by mere knowledge of the currents in the transmitting
LED and receiving photo diode.
4.2
The thickness of the artery oscillates as the heart beats. Correspondingly, the
detected current also varies at the heart rate. This means that we can take the
ratio of the maximum and minimum received currents over the duration of a
heart beat to eliminate the effect of the surrounding tissues. This is because the
2
(3)
The required ratio of [HbO2 ] to [Hb] in Eq. (3) still depends on the amount by
which the arteries expand.
4.3
The dependence on the expansion of the arteries as the heart beats can be
eliminated if we take measurements with two different LEDs, a red LED and an
IR LED. To keep the detected current separate and to lower power consumption,
(4)
ln
(5)
(6)
(7)
HbR HbO2 R R
HbR HbO2 R + (HbO2 R + HbIR )R
(8)
0.81 0.18R
100%
0.63 + 0.11R
We would like to have an idea of the required resolution of the current in the
photodiode given the required accuracy in estimating the SpO2 . From Eq. (8),
S =
0.2025
R
(0.63 + 0.11R)2
We are particularly interested in the accuracy of the SpO2 around 92% because 90% is usually the threshold below which doctors recommend support
for oxygenation. Also insurance companies usually require that the SpO2 level
fall below 88% for them to pay for artificial oxygenation. At this point, R =
0.8. If the maximum tolerated S is 1% around this point, the corresponding
worst-case error in computing R should be below 0.025. At other points such
as 60%, the accuracy is not as important and an error of even 3% is tolerable.
The peak and trough of the detected current are usually very close to each
other. We may write R as,
R R
I +I
ln I R Iac
R
ac
R=
IR
I +I IR
ln I IR Iac
IR
ac
where I R and I IR are the dc currents in the photodiode due to the red and
infra red LEDs. We can approximate this as,
R=1+2
R
IR
Iac
Iac
2
IR
I IR
From this,
R = 2I
1
1
+ IR
R
I
I
I =
I R I IR
I R + I IR
R
2
(9)
Calibration
We would like to calibrate the instrument and measure its accuracy over the
range of useful SpO2 for a large number of people. Accurate calibration is
difficult because a highly accurate measurement of blood gas saturation requires
drawing blood from people and directly measuring oxygen saturation. This is
quite inconvenient. So, in most commercial pulse oximeters, SpO2 is assumed
to follow a quadratic polynomial in R.
SpO2 = a + bR + cR2
where are a,b,c are best-fit co-efficients obtained by fitting a second order
polynomial to a graph of measured R of the instrument to be calibrated vs.
readings(SpO2 ) from a pre-calibrated pulse oximeter for different test subjects.
References
[1] M. Tavakoli, L. Turicchia, and R. Sarpeshkar, An Ultra-Low-Power Pulse
Oximeter Implemented with an Energy-Efficient Transimpedance Amplifier, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1,
pp. 27-38, Feb. 2010.