0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
111 visualizzazioni3 pagine
I. Durkheim outlines two "ideal types" of societies - mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity is based on similarity and a strong collective conscience, while organic solidarity is based on difference and a weakened collective conscience balanced by a strengthened personal conscience.
II. He argues that societies evolve from mechanical to organic solidarity as population size and social complexity increase, weakening traditional social bonds. This transition causes moral and social disruption as new forms of solidarity and morality fail to fully develop.
III. Durkheim asserts that religion plays a key role in maintaining social solidarity through shared rituals and beliefs that unite members of a society and give authority to its moral rules.
I. Durkheim outlines two "ideal types" of societies - mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity is based on similarity and a strong collective conscience, while organic solidarity is based on difference and a weakened collective conscience balanced by a strengthened personal conscience.
II. He argues that societies evolve from mechanical to organic solidarity as population size and social complexity increase, weakening traditional social bonds. This transition causes moral and social disruption as new forms of solidarity and morality fail to fully develop.
III. Durkheim asserts that religion plays a key role in maintaining social solidarity through shared rituals and beliefs that unite members of a society and give authority to its moral rules.
I. Durkheim outlines two "ideal types" of societies - mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity is based on similarity and a strong collective conscience, while organic solidarity is based on difference and a weakened collective conscience balanced by a strengthened personal conscience.
II. He argues that societies evolve from mechanical to organic solidarity as population size and social complexity increase, weakening traditional social bonds. This transition causes moral and social disruption as new forms of solidarity and morality fail to fully develop.
III. Durkheim asserts that religion plays a key role in maintaining social solidarity through shared rituals and beliefs that unite members of a society and give authority to its moral rules.
Some Quotable Quotes from Emile Durkheim (1858-1917)
The Two Ideal Types in The Division of Labor in Society
I. Initial Condition Mechanical Solidarity A) Tribal Segmental Societies (i.e., the horde, clan, etc.) - Based on Similarity B) External Index Repressive Sanctions (penal law) C) Strong Collective Conscience (weak personal conscience) - Volume: Virtually all members affected - Intensity: Believed with general fervor - Rigidity: Clearly defined; concrete and specific; tradition - Content: Explicitly religious D) Morality Privileges the good of society E) Analogous to Spencers militant societies and Tonnies Gemeinschaft [see Herbert Spencer, The Study of Sociology (1891) and Ferninand Tonnies, Community and Society (1887)] ** Independent Variable Increased Dynamic/Moral Density A) A product of increased material density (intra-societal relations) and social volume (population size) B) Generates (via Darwinian mechanisms) the division of labor. II. Dependent Variable Organic Solidarity A) Modern Organized Societies B) Bases on Difference C) External Index Restitutive Sanctions (civil, commercial, administrative, constitutional law) D) Weakened Collective Conscience (strengthened personal conscience) - Volume: More limited in the members affected - Intensity: Adherent to with less fervor - Rigidity: Inchoately defined; abstract and general; conscience - Content: Increasingly secular; moral individualism. E) Morality Privileges the rights of the individual (i.e., the cult of the individual) F) Analogous to Spencers industrial societies and Tonnies Gesellschaft The Moral Problem of Organic Solidarity Profound changes have occurred in the structure of our societies in a very short time. They have become free from the mechanical type with a rapidity and in proportions that are without historical parallel.
As a result, the morality which corresponds to that social type has
regressed, but without the other developing fast enough to fill the ground the first left vacant in our consciences. Our faith has been disturbed; traditions has lost its sway; individual judgment has become free of collective judgment. But on the other hand, the functions that have been dissociated in the curse of the upheaval have not had the time to adjust to one another, the new life that has emerged as if suddenly has not been able to become completely organized, and above all it has not been organized in such a way as to satisfy the need for justice that has become more intense in our hearts. - The Division or Labor in Society (1893) The Individual and the Force of Society At any given moment the moral constitution of society established the contingent of voluntary deaths. There is, therefore, for each people a collective force of a definite amount of energy, impelling men to selfdestruction. The victims act which at first seem to express only his personal temperament are really the supplement and prolongation of a social condition which they express externally. - Suicide (1897) The Divinization of Society So if it [the totem] is at once the symbol of the god and of the society, is that not because the god and the society are only one? How could the emblem of the group have been able to become the figure of this quasi-divinity, if the group and the divinity were two distinct realities? The god of the clan, the totemic principle, can therefore be nothing else than the clan itself, personified and represented to the imagination under the visible form of the animal or vegetable which serves as totem. - The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912) The Moral Authority of Society: Since it [society] has a nature which is peculiar to itself and different from our individual nature, it pursues ends which are likewise special to it; but, as it cannot attain them except through our intermediacy, it imperiously demands our aid. It requires that, forgetful of our interests, we make ourselves its servitors, and it submits us to every sort of inconvenience, privation and sacrifice, without which social life would be impossible. It is because of this that at every instant we are obliged to submit ourselves to rules of conduct and of though which we have neither made nor desired, and which are sometimes even contrary to our most fundamental inclinations and instincts the empire which it holds over consciences is due much less to the
physical supremacy of which it has the privilege than to the moral
authority with which it is invested. If we yield to its orders, it is not merely because it is strong enough to triumph over our resistance; it is primarily because it is the object of a venerable respect. - The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912) Social Solidarity ad the Efficacy of Religious Rituals: Of course men would be able to live without gods, but, on the other hand, the gods would die if their cult [i.e., rituals] were not rendered it is not the material oblations which bring about this regeneration by their own virtues; it is the mental states which these actions, though vain in themselves, accompany or reawaken. The real reason for the existence of cults, even of those which are the most materialistic in appearance, is not to be sough in the acts which they prescribe, but in the internal and moral regeneration which these acts aid in bringing about. The things which the worshipper really gives his gods are not the foods which he places upon the altars, nor the blood which he lets flow from his veins: it is his thought. - The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912) The Hope of New Social Forms in Religion: In short, the former gods are growing old or dying, and others have not been born. This is what voided Comtes attempt to organize a religion using old historical memories, artificially revived. It is life itself, and not a dead past, that can produce a living cult. But the state of uncertainty and confused anxiety cannot last forever. A day will come when our societies once again will know hours or creative effervescence during which new ideals will again spring forth and new formulas emerge to guide humanity. - The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912)