Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
978-0-660-02448-6
Contents
Message from the Speaker of the House of Commons ................................................................................ 1
Joint Message from the Acting Clerk and the Deputy Sergeant-at-Arms ..................................................... 2
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Reviews ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Incident in Brief ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Response of House of Commons Protective Service following October 22, 2014 ...................................... 7
Marc Bosc
Acting Clerk
Patrick McDonell
Deputy Sergeant-at-Arms and
Director General, Protective Service
Introduction
Following October 22, 2014, the House of Commons was cautious not to provide detailed comments or
analysis on the events that took place within Centre Block prior to a comprehensive security assessment
and review.
Any information that is shared with the public will always be subject to a stringent review to ensure that
its release would not compromise the safety and security of everyone on Parliament Hill.
This report provides an overview of the reviews that have been commissioned, a briefing on the incident
itself and detailed information on the response of the House of Commons Protective Service. Additional
context on security governance on Parliament Hill, the mandate and history of the House of Commons
Protective Services and constituency office security is provided in the appendices.
Reviews
Following October 22, 2014, a series of reviews have been initiated at the request of the Speaker of the
House of Commons and the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
The reviews have been conducted by external and internal experts, in order to learn and improve from
the actions undertaken on October 22, 2014 and the days that followed.
These reviews are:
Independent Investigation by the Ontario Provincial Police into the Death of Michael Zehaf-Bibeau.
Independent Investigation by the Ontario Provincial Police into the RCMP Security Posture on
Parliament Hill.
Internal Security Review of the Events of October 22, 2014, prepared by the House of Commons
Protective Service.
Physical Security Review of the House of Commons Precinct, commissioned by the House of
Commons from Defence Research and Development Canada Centre for Security Science, forensics
and other partners.
Lessons Learned Exercise on Emergency Preparedness, Emergency Communications and Support for
the House of Commons Community as conducted by an independent firm at the request of the
House of Commons. Results are being informed by in-depth interviews with key players, and all
Members, their staff, political research office staff and House Administration employees have been
invited to complete a detailed survey.
After Action Review on External Engagement and Coordination: Parliament Hill Incident on October
22nd, 2014, led by the RCMP with partner agencies.
Incident in Brief
On October 22, 2014, at approximately 9:50 a.m., Michael Zehaf-Bibeau shot and killed Cpl. Nathan
Cirillo. Cirillo was posted at the National War Memorial and was unarmed.
Zehaf-Bibeau entered Parliament Hill at the Elgin Street Gate and proceeded to run through the grounds
by East Block. After commandeering a vehicle, he drove to the west side of the Peace Tower and
entered Centre Block through the front doors.
Once inside the building, Zehaf-Bibeau was confronted by House of Commons Protective Service
personnel. Following a struggle during which one of the Protective Service officers was injured, ZehafBibeau ran up the stairs to the Rotunda and exchanged gunfire with House of Commons Protective
Service personnel.
Zehaf-Bibeau then ran north along the Hall of Honour, ultimately attempting to conceal himself behind a
stone pillar. After another exchange of gunfire, Zehaf-Bibeau was approached by members of the House
of Commons Protective Service and members of the RCMP.
The now former Sergeant-at-Arms and a member of the RCMP fired shots that forensic analysis
determined were rapidly fatal and that killed Zehaf-Bibeau. In total, Zehaf-Bibeau had 31 gunshot
wounds, two of which were rapidly fatal with several others independently fatal without prompt
medical attention.
All shooting ceased less than two minutes after Zehaf-Bibeau entered the building and around three
minutes from the time he ran onto Parliament Hill.
The independent investigation conducted by the Ontario Provincial Police concluded that the involved
members were justified in discharging their firearms and in the use of lethal force resulting in the death
of Zehaf-Bibeau.
Parliamentarians, employees, and visitors who were in the building during the incident were collected
and moved to secure rooms during initial sweeps. It was unclear during the incident whether the attack
was the act of an individual working alone or in concert with others. As a result, all those inside Centre
Block were held in the secure rooms throughout the day and evacuations were delayed. Evacuations
from Centre Block were also complicated by the need to protect the crime scene in the Hall of Honour
and Rotunda.
The initial evacuation began at 4:45 p.m., with the majority of the evacuations starting at 7:30 p.m. All
evacuations were completed by 10:10 p.m.
5
Parliament resumed as per its typical sitting schedule on October 23, 2014. The grounds were open to
the public as of the morning of October 25, 2014. Public tours resumed and the House of Commons
galleries re-opened on October 27, 2014.
INTEROPERABILITY
Identified Issue: Improved operational coordination between all security forces is required.
Response: The Senate and House of Commons Protective Services and the RCMP have significantly
increased operational interoperability. Actions have included the creation of a Joint Senior Management
Committee bringing together senior members of all three organizations to enhance coordination efforts
in advance of any crisis and to ensure daily coordination. Frequent operations and intelligence updates
occur among all three partners. Senate and House of Commons personnel are now embedded within
each others operations.
Identified Issue: Improved radio communication among all security forces is required.
Response: Although both the Senate and House of Commons Protective Services have an RCMP radio in
their Operations and Communications Centres for communications between agencies, immediately
following the incident security and police forces from multiple jurisdictions (Senate Protective Service,
House of Commons Protective Service, multiple divisions of the RCMP and the Ottawa Police Service)
responded, making communications interoperability difficult.
The Senate and House Protective Services have since combined radio communications, leading to
greater interoperability inside the buildings; however, challenges remain with regard to communications
interoperability with the RCMP. Discussions are underway to resolve this issue in both the short and
long term.
10
PHYSICAL SECURITY
Identified Issue: The first point of contact between security personnel and visitors coming to Centre Block
should occur prior to visitors entering the building.
Response: Within a few days of October 22, security posts were created outside Centre Block to provide
a contact point with visitors outside of the building and to allow security personnel to conduct cursory
checks prior to visitors entering the building.
Identified Issue: Parliament building entrance points were accessible 24 hours per day.
Response: As a result of the review, a decision was made to lock the doors between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.
and anyone seeking entry during these hours can now make use of a video intercom to communicate
with Protective Service personnel.
Identified Issue: A review of physical security for meeting rooms is required.
Response: Several steps have been taken, with more underway to enhance the physical security
measures of meeting rooms to ensure the safety of all parliamentarians.
11
Identified Issue: Scanning practices need to be reviewed to ensure that industry best practices are being
followed.
Response: Although the scanning equipment was recently upgraded to ensure best in class technology,
further enhancements are recommended. Discussions took place with the Canadian Air Transport
Security Agency (CATSA) to learn about their best practices. Some of those practices are now being
implemented.
Identified Issue: Deployment of front-line staff should be reviewed.
Response: RCMP presence has been increased both inside and outside Centre Block, working
collaboratively with the House of Commons Protective Service and the Senate Protective Service.
Additional security personnel has also been stationed near entrances.
12
13
Vision
To ensure a safe, secure and inviting environment for all those who enter
the Parliamentary Precinct.
Respect Recognize and foster respectful relationships with the public,
clients, security partners and amongst colleagues.
Values
The House of Commons Protective Service has approximately 300 full-time equivalents, which includes
security officers and administration staff.
The Protective Service takes a multi-layered, intelligence-led approach to security to minimize
vulnerabilities. Security measures are driven by a threat and risk analysis process and, where available,
intelligence provided by our security partners. This approach creates an integrated defence by deploying
staff to critical control points and mobile patrols; using building design to maximize sightlines, improve
stand-offs and provide containment for incidents; and using security systems to provide additional
circulation control, monitor sensitive points and provide real-time information for command and control
of incident response as well as valuable forensic data. It is important to design security measures that
reflect the decorum of the institution and maintain an open and welcoming feel for citizens while
providing effective protection for Parliament.
14
Key aspects of the Protective Services mandate include the implementation of the Master Security Plan,
which was developed by the House, the Senate and the RCMP to guide the overall direction of security
in the short, medium and long term within the Parliamentary Precinct. The buildings that host
parliamentary functions are often heritage structures and were not originally designed with security in
mind. Activities in the Master Security Plan are spread over a 25-year period and are implemented
simultaneously with the LTVP, a massive restoration and renovation project aimed at bringing the
Parliament buildings into the 21st century. The schedule is flexible and takes into account the
contributions of other partners, such as Public Works and Government Services Canada.
The service is led by Patrick McDonell, Deputy Sergeant-at-Arms and Director General, Protective
Service. Mr. McDonell joined the House Administration in August 2014, having served in the RCMP for
over 30 years and with the Senate Protective Service for 3.5 years. Mr. McDonell retired from the RCMP
as the Assistant Commissioner in charge of protective policing for Canada, which among other things,
oversees the protection of the Prime Minister.
The House of Commons Protective Service was established in 1920 by an Act of Parliament, to protect
the institution, its Members and the Parliamentary Precinct.
BARGAINING UNITS
The Protective Service Bargaining Unit at the House of Commons is represented by the Security Services
Employees Association (SSEA). This was established on March 24, 1987, following certification by the
Public Service Staff Relations Board. Currently the bargaining unit has 216 members, which includes all
House of Commons Protective Officers at the Constable, Corporal, and Sergeant ranks.
The Scanner Group Bargaining Unit at the House of Commons is represented by the Public Service
Alliance of Canada (PSAC). This was established on December 11, 2003, following certification by the
Public Service Staff Relations Board. Currently the bargaining unit has 50 members, which includes all
Scanner Operators and Scanner Supervisors under the House of Commons Protective Service.
15
16