SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ‘SEARCH WARRANT /S Cac. 948 TO: __THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR HER AGENT OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON D.C. (Specie Law Enforcer! Olea of Cnsicain af Oct ofthe Mopotin Police Dparneat or ata Aura Age) Affidavit, herewith attached, having been made before me by tan Police Department Detective Paul C. Regan (CID) Badge 02-1434 that he has probable cause to believe ‘that on the (person) (premises) (vehicle) (object) known as _AT&T OR ANY OTHER SEF : PROVIDER FOR 202-497-5608 in the District of Columbia, there is now Being concealed certain property, Records relat 2015 and continuing ays ‘numbers subsequestly assigned to the target cellular telephone (See Attachment A) which is Evidence of the criminal offense of Homicide iz ald as | aig satisified (Alege groin forsee) s that there is probable cause to believe that the property so described is being concealed on the at nated (person) (premises) vehicle) (object) and that the foregoing grounds for issuance ofthe warrant exist. YOU ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED within 10 days of the date of issuance of this warrant to search in the daytimefat any time of the ‘day or night, the designated (person) (premises) (vehicle) (object) for the property specified and ifthe property be found there. ‘YOU ARE COMMANDED TO SEIZE IT, TO WRITE AND SUBSCRIBE an inventory of the property seized, to leave a copy of this. ‘warrant and return to file, a further copy ofthis warrant and retum with the Court on the next Court day after its executior Nesued thie _£—“day of A _ 18 RETURN Lrecsved the above detaed waranton__[VQ4_\¥ 1 20_fk-_ and have executed as follows: ‘On Sy » jx, at O42. M, | searched the (person) (premises) (vehicles) object) described in the warrant and | eft a copy of the warrant and return with a properly posted, “iae of person searched owner, zip, custodian or prs presenta pace Tsar) The following is an inventory of the property taken pursuant to this warrant: ——Seu Debs Pred; ake Deis Ska This inventory was made in the presence of Tawar Wat is Te a tue and datalied account of al oroberv ten bv mi undly iw 38 —— ra Or Subscribed and ewornto before me this ZATA aay ot Haw 0S Judge, pe an oT SRO a Mné S orbATTACHMENT A. joenct® Location Data starting on May 10, 2015, and continuing forthe next thirty days for target number 202-497- ‘3608, any other numbers associated with the account, and any new telephone numbers subsequently assigned to the target cell phone. Items to be searched: Subject items to be searched for: ‘* Historic, current, and future data related to: 1. Call logs for both received and transmitted phone numbers starting on May 10, 2015 to present. 2, Time at which the calls were placed. 3. Duration of the phone calls, 4, SMS/MMS data including: Numbers to which messages were sent to, or received from, 5. E-mail data including: Addresses to which messages Were sent to, or received from. 6. Any direct connect/ push-to-talk information transmitted or received by the phone 7. 8 9. Associated dates, times, and durations of any direct connect / pusti-to-talk transmissions, ‘The phone number that is associated with this handheld device. . Cell site activations. 10. Numbers dialed; to include post cut through digits (DDE) 11. Subscriber, ESN, and billing information for the specified wireless telephone. 12. Subscriber, ESN, and billing information for any other wireless telephone on this account or that may be identified from these records. 13. An engineering map, showing all cel-site tower location/addresses, sectors, orientations, and horizontal beam width. 14. The physical addressilocation of all mobile phone towers in the specified market. 15. A list of control channels/radio channels and their corresponding cell sites. 16. Precision tracking though use of GPS. Information to Be wi Devi ‘The pen-trap devices are authorized to collect the following information for the target cell phone, 202-497- 5608, any other numbers associated with the account, and any new telephone numbers subsequently assigned to the target cell phone for a period of thirty days: 1, Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3122-24 All dialing, routing, addressing and signaling information associated with each communication to and from the target cell phone(s), including, but not limited to: 4. Any unique identifiers associated withthe cell phone, including ESN, MEIN, MSISDN, IMSI, IMEI, SIM, or MIN, b. Source and destination telephone numbers and email addresses. €. Date, time and duration of all communications. 2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3122-24 and 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) i. All data about the cell towers (ic, antenna towers covering specific geographic areas) and sectors (ie. faces of the towers) to which the target cell phone(s) will connect at the beginning and end of each communication. aoe GarbSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) Special Proceedings No. FOR A SEARCH WARRANT TO ) OBTAIN LOCATION DATA CONCERNING AN ) 1S cre 146 AT&T CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED —_) 2 CALL NUMBER 202-497-5608 UNDER SEAL Affidavit in Support of a Search Warrant Requesting Location Data for Cellular Phone Number 202-497-5608 INTRODUCTION 1. The affiant is Detective Paul C, Regan, a swom officer of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in Washington, D.C. This affiant has been a member of the MPD for approximately twenty years and is currently a Detective assigned to the Criminal Investigations Division, Electronic Crimes Task Force-Technical Services Unit, Previous assignments include the Homicide Branch, Seventh and Sixth District Detectives’ Unit, and Sixth District Patrol. During my tenure, I have assisted with arrests of persons in violation of narcotics, firearms, and violent crimes. I have received training in the following areas: basic investigative skills; interview and interrogation, Homicide Investigations and am currently a certified instructor with the Metropolitan Police Department. Throughout my tenure I have conducted numerous criminal investigations, interviewed victims, witnesses, and suspects, and have seen criminal cases through the judicial process. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of an application for a search warrant pursuant to ‘Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 41, and 18 U.S.C. Sections 2703 and 3122, directing AT&T to assist members of the United States Secret Service and Metropolitan Police =>[sence 948 Department by providing all information, facilities and technical assistance needed to ascertain the physical location of the cellular telephone assigned call number 202-497-5608 (the “TARGETED CELLPHONE”), with service provided by AT&T the “TARGETED. CELLPHONE PROVIDER’, including but not limited to data indicating the specific latitude and longitude of (or other precise location information concerning) the TARGETED CELLPHONE (the “Requested Information”), for a period of thirty days. 3. Tam familiar with the facts and circumstances of the investigation through my personal participation; from discussions with other members of the United States Secret Service and Metropolitan Police Department and other law enforcement officers; from my discussions with witnesses involved in the investigation; and from my review of records and reports relating to the investigation. Since this affidavit is being submitted for the limited purpose of securing a search warrant authorizing the acquisition of the requested information, I have not included details of every aspect of the investigation. Facts not set forth herein, or in the attached exhibits, are not being relied on in reaching my conclusion that the requested warrant should be issued, Nor do I request that this Court rely on any facts not set forth herein in reviewing this application. 4. Probable cause exists to believe that the requested information may lead to the location and identification of an individual who participated in the offense detailed below, in violation of District of Columbia Criminal Code.BACKGROUND OF THE INVESTIGATION 5. On May 14, 2015 at approximately 1324 hours, DC Fire and EMS were dispatched to 3201 Woodland Drive Northwest Washington, DC for the report of a house fire. Upon arrival, firefighters found smoke and fire visible from a second floor window of a three story residential home. Firefighters forced entry into the residence's front door and began fire suppression. The fire was contained to a second floor room and closet, with minor extension to an adjacent bathroom. While extinguishing the fire, firefighters found the charred remains of a juvenile sized human being on a bed in the room which was on fire. Due to the thermal damage of the body, investigators were unable to determine the race or sex of the human remains. The remains stayed on the scene, Additionally, an adult aged male and two adult aged females were found in an adjacent bedroom. All three of those adults appeared to have suffered trauma to the body. ‘Two were removed from the residence and found to have no signs of life and remained at the scene. The second adult aged female was removed from the residence and transported to Georgetown Hospital where lifesaving efforts failed. Autopsies of all four victims have been conducted by the District of Columbia OCME and for all four decedent's the cause of death is various traumatic injuries and the manner of death is homicide, All four victims have been positively identified. 6.As the investigation progressed and the crime scene was searched it was learned that cellular telephone with target number 202-497-5608, belonging to decedent Amy Savopoulos, was not located. Your affiant believes that this cell phone was in the possession decedent Amy Savopoulos at the time this offense was committed. Your affiant believes that the call detail records and the cellular tower locations for the targeted cellular telephone will lead members of the United States Secret Service and Metropolitan Police Department to the location and at 3identification of person(s) who took the cellular telephone during the commission of this offense. ‘The undersigned further requests that this warrant, and any related documents be scaled until further order of the Court, as disclosure of these materials at this time would usly jeopardize the ongoing investigation. I swear that the statements made in the foregoing affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Reviewed by: Fhali- Detective Metropolitan Police Department Asbistant Unfted Stated Attomey ‘The foregoing affidavit was sworn to the undersigned Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia by Detective Paul C. Regan, Metropolitan Police Department, after g placed under oath as being true and correct, this _/ € day of May 2015. Tudge 2S— Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. SPECIAL PROCEEDING BRANCH In re Search Warrant For: Misc. No. 8 ATRT Cellular Telephone (Scene 74 ‘Number (202) 497-5608 Filed under Seal MOTION TO SEAL AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF SEARCH WARRANT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF ‘The United States of America, by its counsel, the United States Attomey for the District of Columbia, respectfully moves the Court for an Order directing that the affidavit in support of the above-captioned search warrant be placed under seal until further order of the Court. In support of its motion, the government states as follows: The affidavit in support of the search warrant describes an ongoing police investigation which includes information not known to the general public. Disclosure of the information would jeopardize the ongoing investigation and would also raise significant safety concems for witnesses involved in this investigation. WHEREFORE, the government respectfully requests that the affidavit in support of the search warrant be placed under seal. Respectfully submitted, Vincent Cohen, Jr. Acting United States Attorney by: Spe PR td Slot Jeffrey RRag: Assistant United States Attorney 555 4™ Street, N.W., Room 9717 Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 252 7242 DC Bar 415214SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. SPECIAL PROCEEDING BRANCH Inre Search Warrant For: : Mise. No. AT&T Cellular Telephone : (score 148 Number (202) 497-5608 : Filed under Seal ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to seal the affidavit in support of the above-captioned search warrant, it is this __/@ day of May 2015, hereby ORDERED, that the Government's Motion is hereby GRANTED and the affidavit in support of the above-captioned search warrants be sealed until further order of the Court. Judge, Superior Court of the ae ‘of Columbia