0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
16 visualizzazioni2 pagine
Banditry is a complex multivariate phenomenon governed by sociopolitical, cultural, and ecological determinants. The more successful he is as a bandit, the more he is both a representative and champion of the poor. Social banditry was a form of popular protest that was devoid of any explicit ideology.
Banditry is a complex multivariate phenomenon governed by sociopolitical, cultural, and ecological determinants. The more successful he is as a bandit, the more he is both a representative and champion of the poor. Social banditry was a form of popular protest that was devoid of any explicit ideology.
Banditry is a complex multivariate phenomenon governed by sociopolitical, cultural, and ecological determinants. The more successful he is as a bandit, the more he is both a representative and champion of the poor. Social banditry was a form of popular protest that was devoid of any explicit ideology.
1959 Hobsbawm first brings up social banditry in Primative Rebels
-Argued social bandits were typically peasant outlaws who followed the familiar practices of the bandit trade but represented unconscious, primitive forms of popular protest that were devoid of any explicit ideology organization or program -Aimed at landlords and officials, supported by commoners who benefited -Avenger a bandit who was excessively violent and often feared by the poor but still had popular appeal -Doomed to extinction because loss of support and superiority of state Blok- bandits actions contradict stories Achieve mobility at expense of others Undercut instead of strengthen class solidarity Beal bandits are selfish and have no interest in rectifying social wrongs Slatta Banditos No close class ties Used more for economic gain than protest Peasants chose other avenues over banditry Most banditry in sparse areas without settled peasants Many elite-bandit alliances Originated from family feuds, not class injustices Fails to emerge as distinctive historical type in Latin America Guerilla bandits Mexico, independence era Profited from chaos of war and partisanship Haiduk Hobsbawms guerilla bandit Rudimentary political conscience, but support of locals Liberate peasants Political bandits Shifting nature of alliances and power balances the more successful he is as a bandit, the more he is both a representative and champion of the poor and a part of the system of the rich pg 13
Banditry is a complex multivariate phenomenon governed by sociopolitical, cultural,
and ecological determinants Adequate strategy for researching banditry requires police/criminal records and popular sources -records document actual behavior -popular accounts provide social, political, and cultural contexts Knight supports Hobsbawm Banditry = significant form of popular protest Class bonds not essential rely on support of elite Popular support = characteristic of social banditry Revisionists rely mostly on police reports heavily biased and rarely focus on questions relating to group composition and motivation Elite historiography history of individual bandits and their incorporation into, or subordination y, a world of power and interests Guha and Scott -Forms of peasant resistance must not be understood in essentialist terms but historically -Traditional peasant strategies roots can be traced back, relationships to land and production -Not archaic, outmoded, or prepolitical Protest crime actions in defense of peasant moral economy