Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Supplier
Customer
Time is Money
Dr. Attia Gomaa
Industrial Engineering Professor & Consultant
Engineering and Science Services - American University in Cairo
2010
SCM
Content:
SCM
SCM
Suppliers
Company
(Internal Supply
Chain)
Customers
SCM
Vertical Integration
Initial Suppliers
End Users
Tier 2
Suppliers
Raw
Material
Suppliers
Tier 1
Suppliers
Company
XYZ
Customers
Manufacturing
Supply Chain
SCM
TIER THREE
SUPPLIERS
TIER TWO
SUPPLIERS
TIER ONE
SUPPLIERS
SERVICE &
SUPPORT
SUPPLIERS
PRODUCER
DISTRIBUTORS
CUSTOMERS
RECYCLERS/
DISPOSERS
SCM
Supply Chains
Cross Functional vs. Departmental
Customer Focused vs. internal process focused
Customer
Service
Suppliers
Manufacturing
Customers
Distribution
Warehouses
Logistics
Inventory
SCM
Vertical Integration
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
SCM
(6) $1.08
(7) Bread
$1.25
SCM
Initial
Suppliers
End
Users
Tier 4
--
Tier 3
Tier 2
Tier 1
Manufacturer - XX
Egypt
Tier 1
Tier 2
SCM
--
Assembly
-
Egypt
--
Tier 3
Australia
Tier 2
USA
Germany
Tier 1
Malaysia
Tier 2
SCM
USA
--
Major
subassemblies
USA
Assembly
Distribution
centers
Egypt
Raw
materials
Components
China
Manufacturer - XX
Egypt
Tier 1
Suppliers
Retail
Tier 1
Suppliers
Tier 1
Customers
Tier 2
Customers
Initial Suppliers
1
2
n
1
2
3
n
Tier 3 to
Consumers/
End-users
Consumers/End-users
Tier 3 to
Initial
suppliers
n
1
2
1
n
SCM
Focal Company
Plan
Suppliers
Material Costs
SCM
Source
Manufacturers
Make
Deliver
Warehouses &
Distribution Centers
Buy
Customers
Transportation
Transportation
Costs
Transportation
Costs
Manufacturing Costs
Inventory Costs
Costs
SCM
SC Management Processes
PLAN
PLAN
SOURCE
RETURN
MAKE
SOURCE
DELIVER
RETURN
RETURN
DELIVER
RETURN
PLAN
SOURCE
Supplier
Internal or External
MAKE
MAKE
RETURN
DELIVER
RETURN
Customer
Internal or External
Your Company
SCM
Inventory
Production
scheduling
Finance,
labor
Purchasing
1980
MRP II
Major
Manufacturing
Resources
MRP II
All internal
resources
ERP
Coordinated
Manufacturing
and Service
Transactions
1990
MRP
MRP
Production
Management
ERP
Internal customers
and suppliers
Internal
SCM
Extended
ERP/SCM
2000
1970
1960
Internal
ERP/SCM
External suppliers
and customers
Extended
SCM
Extreme/
Integration
SCM
Supply Chain
Management
Sales Force
Automation
MRP II ERP
Enterprise
MRP
mrp
Material Manufacturing
Requirement
Planning
Resource
Planning
(+Capacity)
Manufacturing Resource
Resource
Planning
(+BPRHR
Planning
Logistics
(+Cash flow)
Service..)
Knowledge
Management
SCM
ERP II
Internet
Integration
Business
Intelligent
Customer
Relationship
Management
Supplier Network
Integrated Enterprise
Materials
Procurement
Market
Distribution
Manufacturing
End Consumers
Distribution Network
SCM
Customer
Customer Order Cycle
Retailer
Replenishment Cycle
Distributor
Manufacturing Cycle
Manufacturer
Procurement Cycle
Supplier
SCM
SCM
SCM
Resources
Demand
Production Management
SCM
Supply
Demand
Procurement Management
SCM
Inventory
Cost
Inventory Management
SCM
Price
Cost
Market Management
SCM
Optimize the
Production-Inventory System
Suppliers
Fabrication
(1)
Raw materials
inventory
SCM
Distribution
and sales
Assembly
(2)
Component parts
inventory
(3)
Finished goods
inventory
Attempt to balance
demand , inventory, and cost
Demand
Inventory
SCM
Costs
Supplier
Management
Production
Management
Customer
Management
Right
Quality
Right
Time
Right
Location
Right
Cost
SCM
Supplier
Management
Production
Management
Customer
Management
Information
Management
Cost
Management
Quantity
Management
SCM
Quality
Management
Location
Management
Time
Management
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Supplier
Management
Production
Management
Customer
Management
Information
Management
Cost
Management
Quantity
Management
SCM
Quality
Management
Location
Management
Time
Management
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Right
Material
Handling
Right
Price
Right
Productivity
SCM
Supplier
Management
Quality
Material
Time
Financial
Production
Management
Process
Quality
Material
Time
Financial
Market
Customer
Management
Quality
Material
Time
Financial
Through:
1.
Information Flow Analysis
2.
Market Flow Analysis
3.
Procurement Flow Analysis
4.
Process Flow Analysis
5.
Quality Flow Analysis
6.
Material Flow Analysis
7.
Time Flow Analysis
8.
Financial Flow Analysis
SCM
Suppliers
Company
(Petrojet)
Warehouses &
Distribution Centers
Material
Costs
Transportation
Costs
Customers
Manufacturing
Costs
Transportation
Costs
Inventory
Costs
Transportation
Costs
Cost / Price
+?
+?
+?
+?
+?
30%
5%
50%
5%
5%
5%
100%
Suppliers
Company
(Petrojet)
Warehouses &
Distribution Centers
Lead
time
Transportation
time
Customers
Manufacturing
time
Transportation
time
Inventory
duration
Transportation
time
Total Time
+?
+?
+?
+?
+?
10%
5%
60%
5%
5%
5%
100%
Suppliers
Company
(Petrojet)
Supplier
Defect %
Warehouses &
Distribution Centers
Customers
Transportation
Defect %
Manufacturing
Defect %
Transportation
Defect %
Inventory
Defect %
Transportation
Defect %
Total Defect %
+?
+?
+?
+?
+?
5%
1%
10%
1%
1%
1%
19%
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
V
O
L
U
M
E
F R E Q U E N C Y
SCM
Organization
Structure
Enterprise Chairman
Upstream
Top
Policy
Key Indicators
Middle
Supply Chain Management
Operational
Downstream
Site Implement
SCM
Data
SCM
Production
Management
SCM
Manufacturers
Suppliers
5
Products
Distributors
Products
Customer
Products
Demand
Demand
Information
Improve operations
Increasing levels of outsourcing
Increasing transportation costs
Competitive pressures
SCM
Demand
Increasing globalization
Increasing importance of e-commerce
Complexity of supply chains
Manage inventories
SCM
Procurement
Inventory levels
Lot size
Lead time
Product variety
Customer service
Total Cost
SCM
Upstream
Downstream
Supply side
Demand Side
Customers
SCM
SCM
SCM
MANUFACTURE
DISTRIBUTION
SCM
Typical Issues
Customers
Forecasting
Design
Processing
Inventory
Purchasing
Suppliers
Location
Logistics
SCM
Location
Transportation and logistics
Inventory and forecasting
Marketing and channel restructuring
Sourcing and supplier management
Information and electronic mediated environments
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
SCM
SCM
SCM
functional areas
Combining transaction processing and decision support
Business intelligence
CRM software
SCM
Effort
SCM Outline
Supply Demand
Planning Process
Inventory Management Methodology
Network Design
Training
Performance Measures
Current Performance
Time
SCM
Action Plan
What Should
be done?
Activities
- Scope
- Specific
- Measurable
SCM
When?
Schedule
Duration
Start
Finish
How?
Resources:
- Manpower
- Machines
- Materials
- Method
- Management
- Money
Where?
Location
Indoor
Outdoor
Subcontractor
SCM
SCM
Productivity Analysis
Material
Productivity
Management
Productivity
Manpower
Productivity
Machine
Productivity
Money
Productivity
Method
Productivity
Material Productivity
Root Cause Analysis
Skills
Method
Machine
Material
Environmental
Working
Conditions
Actions
Corrective
Policy
SCM
Prevention
Policy
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Proactive
Policy
Raw materials
Work-in-process
Finished goods
Inventory level
Balance the
advantages and
disadvantages
Scrap flow
Output flow of materials
SCM
Inventory
& Supply
Chains
SCM
SCM
SCM
Cycle Inventory
Q+0 Q
Average cycle inventory = 2 = 2
Pipeline inventory
Pipeline inventory = DL = dL
Safety Stock inventory
One week supply
Average lot size
Average demand
Average Lead time
SCM
350
70
2
Cycle inventory
Pipeline inventory
Safety Stock
350/2 = 175
70*2 =140
1*70 = 70
Cycle inventory
Reduce the lot size
Reduce ordering and setup costs and allow Q to be reduced
Increase repeatability to eliminate the need for changeovers
Pipeline inventory
Change Q in those cases where the lead time depends on the lot size
SCM
Inventory
Level
Product Code
SCM
Process A
SCM
Process B
Value of
each unit
of item B
SCM
Inventory measures:
Case Study
The XYZ Company averaged $2 million in inventory last year, and the cost of
goods sold was $10 million.
Weeks of supply =
Inventory turns =
SCM
$2 million
($10 million)/(52 weeks)
$10 million
$2 million
= 10.4 weeks
= 5 turns/year
Inventory measures:
SCM
Case Study:
Solution:
Type of Inventory
Cycle
Safety stock
Pipeline
Q
350
=
2
2
= 175 units
SCM
Case Study:
Cost of goods sold last year
= $3,410,000,
Working conditions
= 2 weeks per year.
Inventory Items
= 7 item
(3 raw materials, 2 work-in-process items, and 2 finished goods)
Category
Raw materials
Work-in-process
Finished goods
SCM
Part Number
Average Level
Unit Value
15,000
$ 3.00
2,500
5.00
3,000
1.00
5,000
14.00
4,000
18.00
2,000
48.00
1,000
62.00
Part Number
Average Level
Unit Value
15,000
$ 3.00
$ 45,000
2,500
5.00
12,500
3,000
1.00
3,000
5,000
14.00
70,000
4,000
18.00
72,000
2,000
48.00
96,000
1,000
62.00
62,000
$360,500
Total Value
= $65,577/week
Case Study:
The following information is an extract from DELL companys 1999 annual report. All amounts are expressed
in millions:
Net Income (Year 1999)
18,243
Cost of Revenue (Year 1999)
14,137
Cost of Production Materials (Year 1999)
6,423
Production Materials on Hand (25 January 1999)
234
39
6 days
14,137
Inventory Turnover =
234 + 39
For a high-tech company this is a tremendous performance demonstrating the financial success of this direct
selling business.
The corresponding weeks of supply calculation is:
234 + 39
Weeks of Supply =
SCM
14,137
x 52
= 1 week.
SCM
$
Labor
$
Overhead
Sales
Cost
OTD
SCM
Time Analysis
(60 to 70%)
SCM
SCM
Non-Productive Time
Time Losses
Planned
downtime
(t1)
Quality
losses
(t5)
Unplanned
downtime
(t2)
SCM
Speed losses
(t4)
Waiting time
(t3)
Unplanned d.
(t2)
Waiting time
(t3)
Speed losses
(t4)
Quality l.
(t5)
t1
t2
t3
t4
t5
Non-productive time (TL)
Total time losses
(60 to 70%)
t1= 0.75
t2=1.0
t3=0.5
t4=0.25
t5=0.5
Non-productive time (TL)
Start 8 Finish 16
(60 to 70%)
t1
R
t2
Up
EP
t3
QR
t4
t5
Non-productive time (TL)
Total time losses
A= Availability = T2/T0
R= Reliability = T2/T1
U= Utilization = T3/T2
SCM
Modern KPIs
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
OEE = Equipment Availability Performance efficiency Quality rate
(60 to 70%)
Total effective equipment productivity (TEEP)
TEEP =Utilization Availability Performance efficiency Quality rate
SCM
Resources:
Machines / Equipment / Tools
Manpower / Staff
Materials
Method Knowhow / Standard
Money
SCM
What is Capacity?
Capacity
SCM
Capacity Analysis:-
Labor A Labor B
(hr/day) (hr/day)
Crane
1200 ton
1000
800
700
SCM
Consultant
10 hr/d
SCM
Excavator
40 m3/hr
35
30
25
SCM
Boiler
5 ton/hr
3.6
3.5
SCM
Benchmarking
Target
Planned
Actual
SCM
Benchmarking
2000 Car /month
Target
1500 Car /month
Planned
1200 Car /month
Actual
1000 Car /month
SCM
Data
Process Job Work order Center Department Sector Company
Site Manager
Performance = Actual Capacity / Planned capacity
Quality Rate = (Total units Rejected) / Total units
80 to 100%
90 to 100%
Project Manager
Efficiency
Load ratio
70 to 90%
70 to 90%
General Manager
Utilization
= Actual output / Design capacity
Effectiveness = Effective Capacity / Design capacity
60 to 80%
60 to 80 %
KPI
> 80%
Utilization
Measure of planned or actual capacity usage of a
facility, work center, or machine
Utilization =
SCM
Expected capacity
Capacity
Planned hours to be used
Total hours available
Efficiency
Measure of how well a facility or machine is
performing when used
Actual output
Efficiency =
Effective capacity
=
=
SCM
For example:
Design capacity = 10 worker * 8 Hour / day = 80 man day
Effective capacity = 10 worker * 7 Hour / day = 70 man day
Standard Labor rate = 2 unit / man-day
Planned Quantity = 35 unit/day
Actual Production = 30 unit/day
Capacity used = 2 * 30 = 60 man-day
Efficiency
= 60 / 70 = 86 %
Utilization
= 60 / 80 = 75%
Performance
= 30 / 35 = 86 %
SCM
Example
Design capacity = 50 trucks/day
Effective capacity = 40 trucks/day
Actual output = 36 units/day
Efficiency =
Utilization =
Actual output
36 units/day
Effective capacity
Actual output
Design capacity
SCM
40 units/ day
=
36 units/day
50 units/day
= 90%
= 72%
Case:
Scope of work Excavation Process
Design Capacity = 30 m3/hr
Effective Capacity = 25 m3/hr
BOQ = 30,000 m3
Duration = 10 day
Working Condition = 10 hr/day
Planned Performance:
Number of Excavator = 30,000 m3 / (10 day * 10 hr/day * 25 m3/hr)
= 30,000 / 2500 = 12 +2 factor of safety = 14 Equipment
Actual Performance:
Number of Excavators = 14 Eq.
Duration = 12 day
Case:
Scope of work Excavation Process
Design Capacity = 30 m3/hr
Effective Capacity = 25 m3/hr
BOQ = 30,000 m3
Duration = 10 day
Working Condition = 10 hr/day
Planned Performance:
Number of Excavator = 30,000 m3 / (10 day * 10 hr/day * 25 m3/hr)
= 30,000 / 2500 = 12 +2 factor of safety = 14 Equipment
Actual Performance:
Number of Excavators = 14 Eq.
Capacity Evaluation
1.
Design capacity
2.
Effective capacity
3.
Load
4.
Actual output
Duration = 12 day
= 30 m3/hr
= 25 m3/hr
= 30,000/ (14 * 10 d* 10 h) = 21.4 m3/hr
= 30,000/ (14 * 12 d* 10 h) = 17.8 m3/hr
KPIS
Performance
Efficiency
Load
Utilization
Effectiveness
SCM
= 17.8 / 21.4 = 83 %
= 17.8 / 25
= 71 %
= 21.4 / 25
= 85 %
= 17.8 / 30
= 59 %
= 25 / 30
= 83 %
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Production Data:
Product:
Process :
Planned:
- Design capacity =
- BOQ
=
Actual:
BOQ
=
Rejected Units
=
Effective capacity =
Duration
=
Duration
(Rework)
Calculation:
Design capacity
Effective capacity
Planned capacity
Actual output
Variance Limits:
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
3 Monthly
6 Monthly
Annual
=
=
=
=
Capacity Performance
Performance
Quality Rate
Efficiency
Load
Utilization
Eq. Effectiveness
Overall Performance
SCM
Data
Analysis
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
1%
2%
3%
5%
7%
10%
Evaluation
Root Cause
Remedy
Target
Data
Process Job Work order Center Department Sector Company
Performance
80 to 100%
Quality Rate
90 to 100%
Efficiency
70 to 90%
Load ratio
Utilization
60 to 80%
60 to 80 %
KPI
> 80%
Production Data:
Product: Car Manufacturing
Process : Assembly
Planned:
- Design capacity = 150 Car/month
Effective capacity = 140 Car/month
- BOQ
= 300 Car
Duration
= 3 Month
Actual:
BOQ
= 240
Duration
= 3 Month
Rejected Units
= 10
(Rework)
Calculation:
Design capacity
Effective capacity
Planned capacity
Actual output
Capacity Performance
Performance
Quality Rate
Efficiency
Load
Utilization
Eq. Effectiveness
Overall Performance
SCM
=
=
=
=
150 C/m
140 C/m
300/3=100
240/3=80
Variance Limits:
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
3 Monthly
6 Monthly
Annual
1%
2%
3%
5%
7%
10%
= 80/100 = 80%
= 230/240 = 96%
= 80/140 = 57%
= 100/140= 71%
= 80/150 = 53%
= 140/150= 93%
=
Case:
Product: Transformer Manufacturing
Planned:
- Design capacity = 8 coil/ day
Effective capacity = 6 coil / day
- BOQ = 60 coil
Duration = 10 day
QR (92-95)%
Actual:
BOQ
= 60 coil
Duration = 12 day
Rejected units
= 5 coil (Rework)
Variance Limits:
Calculation:
Design capacity
Effective capacity
Planned capacity
Actual output
Capacity Performance
Load ratio
Efficiency
Utilization
Process Effectiveness
Performance
Quality rate
Weekly
= 8 coil /day
= 6 coil /day
= 60 / 10 = 6 coil day
= 60 / 12 = 5 coil /day
= 6 / 6 = 100 % E
= 5 / 6 = 83 % G
= 5 / 8 = 63 % VB
= 6 / 8 = 75 % E
= 5 / 6 = 83 % VB
= (60-5)/60 = 92% N
Evaluation:
Excellent
Good
Normal
Bad
Very Bad
2%
> 5%
+3 to 5%
2%
- 3 to 5%
> - 5%
Weight (0 to 3)
2
3
1
0
3
2
Total 11
Overall Performance =
{2(1.0) + 3(0.83) + 1(0.63) + 0(0.75) +3(0.83) + 2(0.92)} / 11= 9.45/11
= 85.9 % >80% Good
SCM
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Week
Load
Normal
capacity
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
380
275
200
265
225
175
160
140
120
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
Insufficient
capacity
400
Weekly 300
work
200
load
(hours) 100
16
14
12
10
Week
Load
SCM
Normal capacity
Outputs
Quantity
Quality
Cost / Revenue
Inputs
Working Conditions
Critical Resources
Actual Performance
Period #1
Period %
Period
Planned Performance
Period #1
Total %
Cumulative (up to date)
Scope of work
SMART
Key Indicators
(3, 5, or 10) Cost variance, Time Variance, Quality Rate
Future Work
Remedy Corrective / Preventive Actions
Conclusion
SCM
SCM
2.
Standard ratios
3.
Internal examples
4.
External examples
Target Performance
Planned Performance
Documented information
(Database & Reports)
Standard Information
GAP Analysis
Proactive policy
Actual Performance
SCM
Relative
Good Excellent
International standards
Normal
1.
Benchmarking
Bad
References:
3. Internal Benchmarks
4. External Benchmarks
Monthly Target Improve 10 %
(25 man-hour/car)
Documented information:
(Database & Reports)
Standard Information
GAP Analysis
3 man-hour/unit, 12 %
Actual Monthly Average
( 28 man-hour/unit)
SCM
Relative
Good Excellent
2. Standard ratios
Normal
1. International standards
Bad
References:
1) Scope
3) Quality
7) Documentation
6) Critical
Resources
5) Cost
Bad
4) Time
8)
Relations
Normal
Good
2) Safety
Excellent
Organization
Structure
Enterprise Chairman
Upstream
Top
KPIs Report
Key Indicators
Middle
Productivity Analysis
Operational
Downstream
Data
Company: xxxx
General
Manager
Top
Design
Manager
Procurement
Manager
Cost
Manager
Planning
Manager
Production
Manager
Middle
Operational
Site
Outputs:
Item
Production Quantity
Total Revenue
Unit
1000 ton
M$
2009
10
60
2010
12
80
78
83
Unit
hour
1000 ton
1000 M-h
1000 E-h
1000 Kwh
2009
3000
13
1200
600
1500
2010
2700
14
1500
800
2000
Comment
Unit
M$
M$
M$
M$
2009
30
10
12
58
2010
35
12
12
70
Comment
Quality Rate
Comment
Based on this information; discuss the performance evaluation for each managerial level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
Unit
1000 ton
$/ton f
2009
10
6000
2010
12
6667
2010/2009
1.2
1.11
Performance
VG
G
78
83
1.06
Unit
2009
2010
2010/2009
Performance
Performance rate
Ton/hour
3.33
4.44
1.33
EX
Raw Materials
ton/ton f
1.3
1.67
1.28
NC
Labor
M-h/ ton f
120
125
1.04
Machines
E-h/ ton f
60
66.6
1.11
Energy
Kwh/ ton f
150
166
1.106
Unit
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
2009
3000
1000
1200
5800
2010
3500
1200
1500
7000
2010/2009
1.166
1.2
1.25
1.2
Performance
VB
VB
VB
VB
Quality Rate
Physical Units
Index
Calculation
Unit
Period
#1
Perio
d #2
Material Productivity
TF/TM
0.769
0.85
Labor Productivity
TF/MH
0.00833
Unit
Period
#1
Ratio
(P2/P1)
Perf.
????
Output/ Energy
Monetary Units
Index
Calculation
Material Productivity
Labor Productivity
Perio
d #2
Ratio
(P2/P1)
Perf.
Output/ Input
Overall
( 3% N-Normal) (10%: Good/Bad)
SCM
Physical Units
Index
Calculation
Unit
Period
#1
Period
#2
Material Productivity
TF/TM
0.769
0.85
Labor Productivity
TF/100Mh
or
Ratio
(P2/P1)
TF/1000 Mh
or
Perf.
MH/TF
Output/ Energy
Monetary Units
Index
Calculation
Material Productivity
Labor Productivity
Unit
Period
#1
Period
#2
Ratio
(P2/P1)
Perf.
Output/ Input
Overall
( 3% N-Normal) (10%: Good/Bad)
SCM
Physical Units
Index
Calculation
Unit
Period
#1
Period
#2
Ratio
(P2/P1)
Yield
TF/TM
0.769
0.59
1.28
Labor Productivity
Mh/TF
120
125
1.04
Mh/TF
60
66.6
1.11
Energy/ Output
Kwh/TF
150
166
1.106
Calculation
Unit
Period
#1
Period
#2
Ratio
(P2/P1)
Material Productivity
$/$
2.0
1.9
Labor Productivity
$/$
6.0
5.5
Machine Productivity
$/$
5.0
4.4
Revenue/ Cost
$/$
1.03
0.85
Energy Productivity
Perf.
Monetary Units
Index
TP = Profitability
Perf.
Overall
( 3% N-Normal) (10%: Good/Bad)
SCM
Short description:
Key Indicators
Unit
2009
2010
2010/2009
Strength Points:
-
Weakness Points:
-
Area of Concern:
-
Recommendations:
-
Performance
Conclusion:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SCM
Case Study:
Consider the XYZ Spare Parts Company, the data for output produced and
inputs consumed for January 2010 & February 2010 are given below:
Outputs:
Unit
ton
$/ton
Feb. 2011
1000
1900
Jan. 2011
1200
1800
Comment
Unit
day
worker
ton
k.w.h.
Feb. 2011
22
300
1300
200,000
Jan. 2011
25
310
1600
250,000
Comment
Unit
$/man-day
$/ton
$
$/ k.w.h.
$
Feb. 2011
11
1000
9,000
0.5
5,000
Jan. 2011
10
900
10,000
0.5
6,000
Comment
Item
Production volume
Unit Price
Item
Average labor rate
Direct material cost
Total Machining Cost
Energy cost
Overhead Cost
Based on this information; discuss the performance evaluation for each managerial level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
Outputs:
Item
Production Quantity
Unit Price
Unit
m3
LE/m3
Actual
900
2000
Planned
1000
2000
97
> 98 %
Unit
Day
Ton
Ton
Man-day
M3/hour
Actual
12
450
110
80
30
Planned
10
400
100
70
40
Comment
Unit
LE/ton
LE/ton
LE/man-day
LE/day
1000 LE
Actual
420
4600
80
900
1500
Planned
450
5000
75
800
1600
Comment
Quality Rate
Comment
Based on this information; discuss the performance evaluation for each managerial level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
1) Capacity Information:
Item
Unit
Design capacity
Effective capacity
Planned quantity
Total Actual quantity
Rejected quantity (rework)
Car/month
Car/month
Car/Quarter
Car/Quarter
Car/Quarter
Period 2009
First Quarter
Second Quarter
150
140
300
360
240
270
9
12
Total View?
Critical Resources ?
Cost ?
Based on this information; discuss the performance evaluation for each managerial level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
1) Capacity Information:
Item
Unit
Design capacity
Effective capacity
Planned quantity
Total Actual quantity
Rejected quantity (rework)
Car/month
Car/month
Car/Quarter
Car/Quarter
Car/Quarter
Period 2009
First Quarter
Second Quarter
150
140
300
360
240
270
9
12
Unit
Technical Labor X
Ass. Line working hours
Man-hour
Hour
Period 2009
First Quarter
Second Quarter
10000
9000
600
750
Unit
M.LE
M.LE
LE/Car
Period 2009
First Quarter
Second Quarter
1.440
1.460
0.360
0.438
7000
7500
Based on this information; discuss the performance evaluation for each managerial level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
Operational Level:
Scope of Work: Product: Car Manufacturing
1) Capacity Indicators:
Unit
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Variance
(Q2 Q1)
Evaluation
(Q2 to Q1)
Design capacity
Car/3m
450
450
Effective capacity
Car/3m
420
420
Planned quantity
Car/3m
300
360
+ 60
Good
Car/3m
240
270
+ 30
Good
Car/3m
%
9
3.8%
12
4.4%
+ 0.6%
Bad
80%
75%
- 5.0%
Bad
2) Productivity Indicators:
Labor X Productivity
Ass. Line Productivity
Unit
First Q.
Second Q.
Variance
Evaluation
Man-hr/car
33.33
25.00
- 8.33
Good
Hour/car
2.50
2.78
+ 0.28
Bad
Strength Points
SCM
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Rejected quantity
Planned quantity
Performance
Line Productivity
Labor X Productivity
Operational Level:
Scope of Work: Product: Car Manufacturing
1) Capacity Indicators:
Unit
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Variance
(Q2 Q1)
Evaluation
(Q2 to Q1)
Design capacity
Car/3m
450
450
Effective capacity
Car/3m
420
420
Planned quantity
Car/3m
300
360
+ 60
Good
Car/3m
240
270
+ 30
Good
Car/3m
%
9
3.8%
12
4.4%
+ 0.6%
Bad
80%
75%
- 5.0%
Bad
2) Productivity Indicators:
Labor X Productivity
Ass. Line Productivity
Unit
First Q.
Second Q.
Variance
Evaluation
Man-hr/car
33.33
25.00
- 8.33
Good
Hour/car
2.50
2.78
+ 0.28
Bad
Unit
First Q.
Second Q.
Variance
Evaluation
LE/Car
6000
5470
- 530
Good
LE/Car
1500
1622
+122
Bad
LE/Car
7500
7092
- 408
Good
LE/Car
7000
7500
+ 500
Good
LE/Car
- 500
+ 408
+ 908
Good
3) Cost Indicators:
Internal Resource cost
External Resource cost
Unit Cost
Assembly Price
Profit (+) / Losses (-)
SCM
Middle Level:
Scope of Work: Product: Car Manufacturing
1) Capacity Indicators:
Unit
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Variance
(Q2 Q1)
Evaluation
(Q2 to Q1)
80.0%
75.0%
- 5.0%
Bad
96.3%
95.6%
- 0.7%
Bad
57.1%
64.3%
+ 7.2%
Good
71.4%
85.7%
+ 14.3%
Good
53.3%
60.0%
+ 6.7%
Good
93.3%
93.3%
0.0%
Normal
75.23%
78.98%
+ 3.75%
Good
2) Productivity Indicators:
Labor X Productivity
Ass. Line Productivity
Unit
First Q.
Second Q.
Variance
Evaluation
Man-hr/car
33.33
25.00
- 8.33
Good
Hour/car
2.50
2.78
+ 0.28
Bad
Unit
First Q.
Second Q.
Variance
Evaluation
LE/Car
6000
5470
- 530
Good
LE/Car
1500
1622
+122
Bad
LE/Car
7500
7092
- 408
Good
LE/Car
7000
7500
+ 500
Good
LE/Car
%
- 500
- 6.7 %
+ 408
+ 5.8%
+ 908
+12.4 %
Good
LE/Car
5000
5878
+ 878
Good
3) Cost Indicators:
Internal Resource cost
External Resource cost
Unit Cost
Assembly Price
Profit (+) / Losses (-)
Value Added = Price ER
SCM
7.20 %
8.33 %
12.40 %
5.0 %
0.28 Hour/car
3) Recommendation:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCM
Standard Forms?
(Performance Evaluation Forms)
Standard Forms?
(Follow-up Forms)
Top
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
SCM
Case Study:
Consider XYZ Spare Parts Company, the monthly KPIs for Up-Stream
Performance Management are given below:
Monthly KPIs:
Profitability ratio
(%)
(%)
(man-hr/unit)
(ton/unit)
(%)
Based on this information; Design the performance evaluation forms for each managerial
level:
1) Operational level
SCM
2) Middle level
Monthly KPIs:
Scope of work: RF Concrete
Profitability ratio
(%)
Cost Variance ratio
(%)
Schedule Variance ratio (%)
Labor Productivity (man-hr/unit)
Material Productivity (ton/unit)
Quality Rate
(%)
Standard Forms?
(Performance Evaluation Forms)
Standard Forms?
(Follow-up Forms)
Enterprise
Chairman
Top
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
SCM
Profitability
Enterprise
Chairman
Top
Price
Total Cost
Material Cost
Labor Cost
Equipment Cost
Overhead ratio
Material Quantity
No. of Workers
No. of Equipment
Duration
SCM
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
Enterprise
Chairman
Top
Price
Total Cost
Material Cost
Labor Cost
Equipment Cost
Overhead ratio (30%)
Middle
Labor (5 workers)
SCM
Equipment (3 M/c)
Duration (10 days)
Operational
Site / Process
Enterprise
Chairman
Top
Price
$170000
Middle
Labor (5 workers)
SCM
Equipment (3 M/c)
Duration (10 days)
Operational
Site / Process
Enterprise
Chairman
Top
x
x
x
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
SCM
x
x
Top
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
SCM
Top
x
x
x
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
SCM
Enterprise
Chairman
Top
x
x
x
Middle
Operational
Site / Process
SCM
Outputs:
Item
Production Quantity
Total Revenue
Unit
ton
M$
Actual
Planned
Comment
Defect Quantity
ton
Unit
hour
Ton
Man-hr
M/c-Hr
Actual
Planned
Comment
Unit
M$
M$
M$
M$
M$
Actual
Planned
Comment
Based on this information; discuss the performance evaluation for each managerial level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
Unit
1000 ton
$/ton f
Quality Rate
Actual
Planned
Ratio (A/P)
Performance
Actual
Planned
Ratio (A/P)
Performance
Actual
Planned
Ratio (A/P)
Performance
%
Unit
Performance rate
Ton/hour
Raw Materials
ton/ton f
Labor
M-h/ ton f
Machines
E-h/ ton f
Unit
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
$/ ton f
Physical Units
Index
Calculation
Unit
Yield
TF/TM
Labor Productivity
Mh/TF
Mh/TF
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Ratio
(A/P)
Performan
ce
Monetary Units
Index
Calculation
Unit
Material Productivity
$/$
Labor Productivity
$/$
Machine Productivity
$/$
Revenue/ Cost
$/$
TP = Profitability
Ratio
(A/P)
Performa
nce
Overall
( 3% N-Normal) (10%: Good/Bad)
SCM
Short description:
Unit
%
M$
hour
%
%
%
Actual
Planned
Ratio (A/P)
Strength Points:
-
Weakness Points:
-
Area of Concern:
-
Recommendations:
-
Performance
Conclusion:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SCM
Case Study:
Consider XYZ Spare Parts Company, the monthly KPIs for Up-Stream
Performance Management are given below:
Monthly KPIs:
1. Profitability ratio
(%)
(%)
(%)
4. Labor Productivity
(man-hr/unit)
5. Material Productivity
(ton/unit)
6. Cycle Time
(min/ton)
7. Performance Rate
(ton/hr)
8. Quality Rate
(%)
9. Efficiency
(%)
10. Effectiveness
(%)
11. OEE
(%)
Based on this information; Design the performance evaluation forms for each managerial
level:
1) Operational level
2) Middle level
3) Top level (KPI report)
SCM
Case Study:
Consider a construction project, the monthly KPIs for Up-Stream
Performance Management are given below:
Monthly KPIs:
Efficiency (%) = Actual quantity / Planned quantity
Cost Variance ratio (%) = (Actual cost Planned cost) / Planned cost
Schedule Variance ratio (%) = (Actual duration Planned duration) / Planned cost
Margin Factor (%) = Price / Direct cost
Labor Productivity (man-hr/m3) = (No. of workers * Working hours) / Quantity
Based on this information; Design the performance evaluation forms for each managerial
level:
1) Operational level
SCM
2) Middle level
Inventory Management
SCM
Distribution of Costs
Type
Electrical
Mechanical
Construction
& Asphalt
Labor
40%
35%
15%
Material
35%
40%
55%
Equipment
10%
15%
25%
Overhead
15%
10%
5%
Total Cost
100%
100%
100%
Type
Gas PL off
Gas PL on
Labor
15%
15%
15%
Material
60%
40%
60%
Equipment
15%
20%
15%
Overhead
10%
25%
10%
Total Cost
100%
100%
100%
SCM
2.Right Quantity
4.Right Location
5.Right Method
6.Right Cost
7.Right Supplier
8.Right Database
Inventory Management =
Targets + Planning + Organizing + Leading + Controlling
Inventory
Strategy
Inventory
Strategy
Forecasting
Transport
Strategy
Transport
Strategy
Inventory decisions
Storage decisions
service goals
The product
Logistics service
Ord . proc. & info. sys.
Location
Strategy
Location
Strategy
CONTROLLING
Storage fundamentals
Transport decisions
ORGANIZING
scheduling decisions
Customer
PLANNING
Transport fundamentals
Location decisions
SCM
>80%
SCM
= 45,000 item
Available # of items
= 27,000 item
Used # of items
= 9,000 item
80%
80%
80%
80%
SCM
Inventory Turnover
Inventory Turnover
Inventory Turnover
Average Inventory
Service Level
1-
SCM
Service
Level
Amount of inventory
SCM
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Lead time: time interval between ordering and receiving the order
SCM
SCM
Q
Reorder
point, R
Safety Stock
0
SCM
Lead
time
Order
Order
Placed Received
Lead
Time
time
Order
Order
Placed
Received
9-22
Main Parameters:
Right Order Quantity
Right Reorder Level
Right Safety Stock
SCM
SCM
Fixed-order-interval Model
Quantity on hand
Q2
Q1
Stock
level
reviewed
Order
received
LT
LT
Time
T = review interval
M = maximum level
q = quantity on hand
M - q = replenishment quantity
Qi = order quantity
LT = lead time
SCM
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
SCM
M
Q3
Q2
Q1
Stock
order
Order
received
Safety Stock
0
LT
M = maximum level
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
SCM
Time
LT
Qi = order quantity
LT = lead time
9-60
Inventory Classifications
Inventory
Process
stage
Raw Material
WIP
Final Products
Spare Parts
Number
& Value
A Items
B Items
C Items
Demand
Type
Independent
Dependent
Disciplines
Maintenance
Operating
Safety
1. Raw materials
2. Operating
supplies
SCM
3. Semi-finished products
4. Finished products
SCM
Independent demand
items demanded by external customers
Independent Demand
Dependent Demand
A
C(2)
B(4)
Drives MRP
D(2)
E(1)
D(3)
F(2)
Demand Characteristics
Independent demand
Dependent demand
100 x 1 =
100 tabletops
100 tables
Continuous demand
Discrete demand
400
300
No. of tables
No. of tables
400
200
100
1
SCM
3
Week
300
200
100
5
M T W Th F
M T W Th F
Total Value %
Total Item %
Level
A
Critical
>= 80
<= 20
Medium
15
30
Non-critical
50
Important matrix:
Important
Not important
Urgent
(due soon)
Not urgent
(not due soon)
A
B
B
C
Value)
SCM
P e rc e n ta g e o f D o lla rs
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage of Items
SCM
High
Annual
$ value
of items
C
Low
Few
Many
Number of Items
SCM
ABC Classification
A - Receive tight control
(Continuous Control) Daily feedback
Top 10-20%
-Critical activities
-Critical materials
-Critical labor
-Critical equipment
-Critical tools
Part
classification
(Rule 80/20)
Top 2 Parts
SCM
Part list:
Item
Code
Unit price
($)
Annual Demand
(unit)
S11
10
1000
S12
40
100
S13
100
10
S14
30
200
S15
20
500
S16
200
600
S17
100
40
S18
55
950
S19
80
30
S20
100
20
Item
Code
Unit
price ($)
Annual
Demand
(unit)
Annual
Value $
Cumulative
value $
Cumulative
%
S16
200
600
120000
120000
56.7%
A1
S18
55
950
52250
172250
81.4%
A2
S11
10
1000
10000
182250
86.1%
B1
S15
20
500
10000
192250
90.8%
B2
S14
30
200
6000
198250
93.7%
B3
S12
40
100
4000
202250
95.6%
C1
S17
100
40
4000
206250
97.4%
C2
S19
80
30
2400
208650
98.6%
C3
S20
100
20
2000
210650
99.5%
C4
S13
100
10
1000
211650
100.0%
C5
Total
SCM
Item
Level
211650
Carrying
Costs
Expected
Stockout
Costs
SCM
Order/
Setup
Costs
Inventory Costs:
Carrying Cost
cost of holding an item in inventory
Ordering Cost
cost of replenishing inventory
Shortage Cost
temporary or permanent loss of sales when demand
cannot be met
SCM
Annual cost
Ordering Costs
Cost
($)
Ordering
=
Costs
D
(
) Co
Q
Order Quantity:
Inventory
Level
(units)
Order
Quantity
Q
Average Inventory =
Order Quantity Q
2
2
Time
SCM
Carrying Costs
Cost
($)
Q
Carrying Costs = ( 2 ) Cc
Ordering
=
Costs
D
(
) Co
Q
Stock out = 0
Annual
cost ($)
Shortage cost =0
Qopt
Total Cost
Carrying Cost =
Minimum
total cost
C cQ
2
CoD
Ordering Cost = Q
Optimal order
Qopt
SCM
Order Quantity, Q
Stock out = 0
Shortage cost =0
Ordering cost
Carrying cost
cost of keeping
goods in inventory
SCM
cost of placing
an order
SCM
Inventory Management
Stock out = 0
Shortage cost =0
Total
Total
Inventory = Carrying +
Costs
Costs
SCM
Total
Ordering
Costs
2CoD
Qopt =
Cc
Total Cost
Carrying Cost =
Minimum
total cost
C cQ
2
CoD
Ordering Cost = Q
Optimal order
Qopt
SCM
Order Quantity, Q
Deriving Qopt
CoD
CcQ
TC =
+
Q
2
CoD
Annual ordering cost =
Q
Annual carrying cost =
-CoD
Cc
TC
=
2 +
Q
2
Q
CcQ
-C0D
Cc
0=
+
Q2
2
CoD
CcQ
Total cost =
Q + 2
Optimal Time Between Orders or
Order Cycle time
Number of orders per year:
Qopt =
*
Q
T*
D
Cc
D
N *
Q
2CoD
D - annual demand
Q - order quantity
Q
Reorder
point, R
0
Lead
time
Order
Order
Placed Received
Lead
Time
time
Order
Order
Placed
Received
Lead Time
Input
SCM
Wait
Time
Move
Time
Output
Basic Tradeoffs:
(EOQ) increases:
Annual inventory
carrying cost also
increases
Annual cost
As order quantity
Minimum cost
reorder quantity
Total Costs
Carrying
Cost
Shortage
Cost
Annual ordering
cost decreases
Order/Set-up
Cost
Annual shortage
cost decreases
SCM
Quantity on-hand
plus on-order
Q
Reorder
point, R
Safety Stock
0
(Uncertain conditions)
Lead
time
Order
Order
Placed Received
Lead
Time
time
Order
Order
Placed
Received
9-22
EOQ:
Cost of placing order = $6.40 / order
Annual per-unit carrying cost = $0.24/year
Annual demand = 52 unit/year
Calculate the Optimal order quantity ?
Qopt =
2CoD
Cc
2*6.4*52
0.24
= 52 unit/order
SCM
2CoD
Cc
2*6.4*7500
10
= $98/trip
Example:
Qopt =
2CoD
Cc
Qopt =
2*$15*300
$0.10
300*300
= 300 unit
Order once-per-year
SCM
Qopt =
Qopt =
2*$15*300
$1
30*300
2CoD
Cc
~ 95 boxes
Example:
2CoD
Cc
2($3.50)(160)
$0.30
= 61.1 unit
CoD
CcQ
= ($3.50)(160) + ($0.30)(61.1)
Inventory cost =
+
Q
2
61.1
2
Inventory cost = $18.33
SCM
2CoD
Cc
2($0.35)(160)
$0.30
= 19.3 unit
(down from 61.1)
CoD
CcQ
= ($0.35)(160) + ($0.30)(19.3)
Inventory cost =
+
Q
2
19.3
2
Inventory cost = $5.80 (down from $18.33)
SCM
Brain Storming:
Annual Demand = 12,000 per year,
Order Cost = $10 per order
Holding Cost = $1 per unit per year
Lead time = 4 weeks
Calculate:
1. Economic order quantity
2. Order cycle time
3. Number of orders per year
4. Total inventory cost
5. Reorder level
SCM
Stock out = 0
Shortage cost =0
Fixed order cost
Variable Carrying cost
Certain demand rate
Certain lead time
Variable order cost
Fixed carrying cost
Variable lead time
Variable demand rate
Brain Storming:
Annual Demand = 12,000 per year,
Order Cost = $10 per order
Holding Cost = $1 per unit per year
Lead time = 4 weeks
Qopt =
Calculate:
1. Economic order quantity
2CoD
Cc
Co = $ 10 per order
d= 12000/52 = 231 unit/week
Cc = $ 1.0 per order
LT= 4 weeks
D = 12000 unit/year
Optimal Order Quantity?
Qopt =
2CoD
Cc
2(10)(12000)
= 490 unit
Order cycle time = Q/D = (490/12000) = 0.04 year *365 day = 15 day
CoD
CcQ
= (10)(12000) +
Inventory cost =
Q + 2
490
Inventory cost = $
(1)(490)
2
490.0 /year
SCM
Inventory level
Reorder
point, R
LT
LT
Time
SCM
Stock-out
Inventory level
Q
Reorder
point, R
Safety Stock
LT
LT
Time
SCM
Annual Demand
Operation condition
Lead time length
Safety Stock
= 600 unit
= 300 days per year
= 12 days
= 20 unit by default (1.5%)
SCM
44 units
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Reorder Point
SCM
Reorder Point:
SCM
Data:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
10.3
4.9
8.9
11.7
6.3
7.7
Variance = S
Standard Deviation =
SCM
n 1
= 6.368
= 2.523
From:http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/Normal/instructornotes.html
SCM
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Description
Service level %
99.99966
Near Zero
Stock-out
(3.4 PPM)
99.73
95.46
68.26
SCM
HSE
effect
Duration
effect
Performance
effect
Cost
effect
I- Constraint
(limited)
2- Enhance
3- Accept
(Normal)
SCM
R d L z , where
d = average daily demand
L = lead time
SCM
Required:
Number of Orders = n = D / EOQ = 520/62 = 8.4 order / year
Reorder Interval = 52 Week / n = 6.2 or 6 wk
Safety stock= Z(LT d2 ) = 3 . (3*64) =
Demand rate = D / No. of periods = 520/52 = 10 unit/week
ROP = d x LT + Safety Stock = 10 * 3 +
SCM
Annual Demand
= 600 unit
Operation condition
= 300 days per year
Average Lead time
= 12 days
Standard deviation of lead time = 2
Z
=3
Safety Stock ?
ROP?
SCM
SCM
*
Q
T*
D
D
N *
Q
*
D - annual demand
Q - order quantity
Quantity on-hand
plus on-order
Q
Reorder
point, R
Safety Stock = f (uncertain demand & uncertain LD)
Safety stock= Z(LT d^2 ) (Certain LT & uncertain demand)
SCM
Lead
time
Order
Order
Placed Received
Lead
Time
time
Order
Order
Placed
Received
9-22
Periodic Review
Estimate Q* from the EOQ formula as if under demand
certainty conditions. Recall that this is Q* = 322 units.
Now,
SCM
SCM
Case #1:
Car Maintenance Center
Part
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
Number of
Failures
1
8
3
5
0
0
44
0
0
Part
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
Number of
Failures
38
0
1
31
1
1
0
16
1
Number of Failures
Percent of Total
44
38
31
16
8
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
150
29
25
21
11
5
3
2
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.66
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUMBER OF FAILURES
-86
100-50
50403020100-
-0
Q B
O R
I E H K F P
-100
150-
Number of Failures
Cumulative percent of
Total
Classification
G
J
M
Q
B
D
44
38
31
16
8
5
29
54
75
86
91
95
A
(Continuous Review)
FOQ Approach
B
(Periodic Review)
POQ Approach
Weekly
C
A
O
R
N
L
I
E
H
K
F
P
Total
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
150
97
98
98
99
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
SCM
C
(Non-critical)
(Periodic Review)
POQ Approach
Monthly
Case #2:
Failure
classification
(Rule 80/20)
Top 4 failures
SCM
Part
Code
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
Number of
failures
2
2
19
11
2
12
17
10
11
4
MTTR
(hour)
4
15
1
14
21
12
1
5
12
3
other
Part
Code
Number
of
failures
MTTR
(hour)
Total
downtime
hours
Cum.
DT
P14
11
P16
14
154
154
25.3%
A1
12
12
144
298
49.0%
A2
P19
11
12
132
430
70.7%
A3
P18
10
50
480
78.9%
A4
P15
21
42
522
85.9%
B1
P12
15
30
552
90.8%
B2
P13
19
19
571
93.9%
B3
P17
17
17
588
96.7%
C1
P20
12
600
98.7%
C2
P11
608
100.0%
C3
Total
Cum. %
Item
Level
Level
608
Recommendations:
Number of
failures
60%
MTTR
(hour)
40%
Value
Level
P14
11
14
P16
12
12
P13
19
A1
A2
A3
A4
P19
11
12
P17
17
P15
21
P18
10
P12
15
P20
P11
SCM
B1
B2
B3
C1
C2
C3
Case #3:
Part
Code
Number of
failures
80%
MTTR
(hour)
20%
HSE
effect
(1 to 3)
Repair
cost
(1 to 3)
Delivery
type
(1 to 3)
P11
P12
15
P13
19
P14
11
14
P15
21
P16
12
12
P17
17
P18
10
P19
11
12
P20
MTTR (hour)
20%
P13
19.0
P17
Part
Code
Value
Level
1.0
15.4
A1
17.0
1.0
13.8
A2
P16
12.0
12.0
12.0
A3
P14
11.0
14.0
11.6
A4
P19
11.0
12.0
11.2
B1
P18
10.0
5.0
9.0
B2
P15
2.0
21.0
5.8
B3
P12
2.0
15.0
4.6
C1
P20
4.0
3.0
3.8
C2
P11
2.0
4.0
2.4
C3
SCM
Part
Code
P11
Process
efect
L
HSE
effect
L
Repair
cost
L
Delivery
type
L
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
SCM
Part
Code
HSE
effect
Process efect
Repair cost
Delivery type
P13
P16
P20
P14
P17
P19
P18
P15
P11
P12
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
2
3
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
2
SCM
Case #3:
Part
Code
Number of
failures
MTTR
(hour)
HSE
effect
(1 to 4)
Repair
cost
(1 to 4)
Delivery
type
(1 to 3)
P11
P12
15
P13
19
P14
11
14
P15
21
P16
12
12
P17
17
P18
10
P19
11
12
P20
Part Code
(1)
HSE effect
(1 to 4)
(2)
Process
effect
(A,B,C)
(3)
Repair
cost
(1 to 4)
(4)
Delivery
type
(1 to 3)
P11
C3
P12
B2
P13
B3
P14
A1
P15
B1
P16
A2
P17
C1
P18
A3
P19
A4
P20
C2
4: Critical
3: Major
2: Medium
Level
1: Minor
Part
Code
(1) 50%
(2) 25%
HSE effect
Total
(1 to 4)
Downtime
(A,B,C)
(3) 15%
Repair
cost
(1 to 4)
(4) 10%
Delivery
type
(1 to 3)
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
RPN
Level
Part
Code
(1) 50%
HSE effect
(1 to 4)
(2) 25%
Total
Downtime
(A,B,C)
(3) 15%
Repair cost
(1 to 4)
(4) 10%
Delivery
type
(1 to 3)
RPN
Level
P16
3.9
A1
P13
3.4
A2
P14
3.15
A3
P20
2.6
B1
P19
2.15
B2
P15
1.9
C1
P12
1.85
C2
P17
1.8
C3
P18
1.8
C4
P11
1.15
C5
A: Major
SCM
B: Medium
C: Minor
Case #4:
Failure
classification
(Rule 80/20)
Top 4 failures
Based on this information,
classify & discuss these
items.
SCM
Part
Code
Number of
failures
(40%)
MTTR
(hour)
(60%)
P11
P12
15
P13
19
P14
11
14
P15
21
P16
12
12
P17
17
P18
10
P19
11
12
P20
Case #5:
Item Criticality is Very High
History for 2000:
Month #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Required:
Reorder Interval
Number of orders
EOQ
Safety stock
Demand rate
ROP
SCM
Stock-Outs
0
0
44
0
0
50
0
0
35
0
55
0
Case #6:
You manage a gas station:
Tank size = 8,000 gallon
(Max
Carrying Cost:
Fixed carrying cost = $5,000 / year
Variable carrying cost = $ 1/gallon/year
Order Cost:
Fixed order cost $100 / order
Variable order cost = $ 0.1/gallon
Shortage Cost:
Direct shortage cost rate = $ 0.1/gallon
Indirect shortage cost rate = $ 0.2/gallon
Current order quantity 6000 gallon
Standard order quantities are: 4000 or 6000 gallons
Lead time = (1 to 3) days (Uniform Dis.)
SCM
SCM
Actual Sales
34,000
29,000
28,000
28,000
35,000
24,000
35,000
26,000
29,000
24,000
28,000
25,000
Shortage
2,000
1,000
1,000
3,000
4,000
1,000
1,000
2,000
4,000
1,000
1,000
4,000
Basic Tradeoffs:
(EOQ) increases:
Annual inventory
carrying cost also
increases
Annual cost
As order quantity
Minimum cost
reorder quantity
Total Costs
Carrying
Cost
Shortage
Cost
Annual ordering
cost decreases
Order/Set-up
Cost
Annual shortage
cost decreases
SCM
Total
Average
SCM
345,000
28750
358
29.8
351
29.25
Shortage
2,000
1,000
1,000
3,000
4,000
1,000
1,000
2,000
4,000
1,000
1,000
4,000
25,000
2083
Required Dem.
36,000
30,000
29,000
31,000
39,000
25,000
36,000
28,000
33,000
25,000
29,000
29,000
370,000
30833
Shortage Cost
= 8,000 $ / year
= 7500 $ / year
6) Capacity utilization =
Available Inventory limit / Maximum Inventory limit
Available Inventory limit = Q = 6000 unit
Capacity utilization = 6000/8000 = 75 %
Material utilization =
Used Material / Available Material
= 100% (shortage Zero Overstock)
SCM
<5%
< 10
Capacity utilization
> 80%
> 99%
SCM
LT = (1+3)/2 = 2 day
d = 131.5 unit
LT = 1 day
<= 4.54 %
Quantity on-hand
plus on-order
LT =2
Order
Placed
Order
Received
LT =2
Order
Placed
Time
Order
Received
9-22
SCM
Case #12 :
You manage a gas station:
Tank size = 10,000 gallon
Fixed carrying cost = $5,000 / year
Variable carrying cost = $ 1/gallon/year
Fixed order cost $100 / order
Variable order cost = $ 0.1/gallon
Standard order quantity is:
3000, 4000, 5000, or 6000 gallons.
Average lead time = (1 to 3) days
Uniform distribution
SCM
Dependent demand
Dependent Inventory Model
SCM
Power Train
Motor
SCM
Gear
Chassis
Motorcycle
Exhaust
Front
Wheel
Rear
Wheel
Frame
Brake
Master
Production
Schedule
(MPS)
MRP Model
Product
Structure
Record
(BOM)
Material
Requirement
Planning
(MRP)
Inventory
Status
Records
Purchase &
Production
Plans
Work
orders
SCM
Purchase
orders
Rescheduling
notices
Elements of MRP
Inputs
Service-Parts
Orders and
Forecasts
Inventory
Transaction Data
Inventory
Status File
Order Changes
Order
Planned
Order
Schedule
Master
Production
Schedule
Bill of
Materials File
SCM
Outputs
MRP
System
Planning
Report
Performance
Exception
Reports
MRP Structure
Data Files
BOM
Output Reports
MRP by
period
report
Master
production
schedule
MRP by
date
report
Lead times
(Item master file)
Planned
order report
Inventory data
Purchasing data
Material
requirement
planning
programs
(computer and
software)
Purchase advice
Exception reports
Order early or late
or not needed
Order quantity
too small or too
large
SCM
MRP Formulae
Available = On-hand - Safety stock Allocated
On-hand is inventory physically present
Allocated is inventory reserved for special orders
On-hand = Prior period's on-hand + Scheduled receipts
Net requirement = Gross requirement - Available
SCM
On
Scheduled
+
hand
receipts
Net
= requirements
Available inventory
SCM
SCM
Period
Net requirements
35
10
Planned order
35
10
Total
40
20
10
30
150
40
20
10
30
150
(Assume LT)
EOQ example
Setup cost, S = $100
Unit price, C = $50
Holding costs, HR = .24 per annum
HP = .02 per period
Annual demand, D = 200
Q = (2DS / CHR)1/2 = 58
Period
Net requirements
35
10
Planned orders
58
Remnants
23
SCM
40
20
10
30
58
13
13
31
10
58
31
11
54
24
24
Period
Net requirements
35
10
Planned orders
85
SCM
4
40
20
10 30
35
Total
150
30
Case Study :
A Blast em, dude audio kit (A) is made of 2 small tweeter
boxes (B) and 3 large woofer boxes (C). Each tweeter is made
of two speakers (D) and two shipping boxes (E). Each woofer
consists of two boosters (F) and two shipping boxes (E). Each
booster is made of one circuit board (G) and one speaker (D).
Lead times
A
1 wk.
B
2
C
1
D
1
E
2
F
3
G
2
E(2)
2
3
D(2)
amp-booster
E(2)
Packing box and
installation kit of wire,
bolts, and screws
booster assembly
G(1)
D(2)
Amp-booster
12 Speaker
12 Speaker
4 levels here.
A
Level 0
2B
level 1
level 2
level 3
SCM
2D
3C
2E
2F
G
2E
D
Low-level coding
Necessary for identical items existing at diff. levels in
the BOM.
An item is coded at the lowest level at which it is
used.
Level 0
2B
level 1
level 2
level 3
SCM
2D
3C
2E
2F
G
2E
D
A
B(2)
C(3)
E(3)
D(2)
SCM
E(1)
F(2)
G(1)
D(2)
50
50 x 2 = 100
50 x 3 = 150
B(2)
C(3)
E(3)
D(2)
100 x 2 = 200
SCM
100 x 3 =
300
E(1)
150 x 1 =
150
150 x 2 =
300
F(2)
G(1)
300 x 1 = 300
D(2)
300 x 2 = 600
Product A
Part B: 2 x number of As =
Part C: 3 x number of As =
Part D: 2 x number of Bs
+ 2 x number of Fs =
Part E: 2 x number of Bs
+ 2 x number of Cs =
Part F: 2 x number of Cs =
Part G: 1 x number of Fs =
SCM
50
(2)(50) =
(3)(50) =
100
300
Start production of D
1 week
2 weeks to
produce
2 weeks
2 weeks
1 week
1 week
2 weeks
3 weeks
1 week
SCM
4
5
Time in weeks
Figure 14.4
SCM
SCM
Case :
Clipboard
Top clip (1)
Pivot (1)
Finished clipboard
Pressboard
(1)
Top Clip
(1)
SCM
Rivets (2)
Pressboard (1)
Product Structure:
Spring (1)
Level 0
Clipboard
Clip
Assembly (1)
Bottom Clip
(1)
Rivets
(2)
Pivot
(1)
Level 1
Spring
(1)
Level 2
Case :
Bill-of-Material - Product Structure Tree
Bicycle(1)
P/N 1000
Handle Bars (1)
P/N 1001
Wheels (2)
P/N 1003
SCM
Frame (1)
P/N 1004
Case :
SCM
Bill of Materials
Case :
Bill of Materials
Back
legs
SCM
Front
legs
Back slats
Seat cushion
Leg supports
Seat-frame
boards
A
Ladder-back chair
SCM
Demand Forecasting
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
Procurement Management
SCM
Production
Procurement
Sales
Inventory
Supplier
Supplier
Storage
Mfg.
Storage
Dist.
Retailer
Customer
Supplier
SCM
Business Operations:
Early Stage, with independent functions
Sales
Inventory
Barrier
SCM
Barrier
Delivery
Production
Procurement
Barrier
Barrier
Barrier
Barrier
Input
Sales
Production
Delivery
Output
Objective
Input
Delivery
Sales
Production
Output
Functional integration
SCM
Material
Management
Barrier
SCM
Production
Manage
ment
Barrier
Logistics
Manage
ment
Barrier
Barrier
Internal Integration
Material
Management
Production
Management
Logistics
Management
Barrier
SCM
Barrier
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
Procurement Cycle
SCM
1. Procurement
Strategy
2. Supplier
Identification
7. Supplier
Review
Procurement
Cycle
3. Establish
Supplier
Relationship
4. Finalize
Business
Negotiations
6. Supplier
Development
5. Monitor
Supplier
Performance
SCM
Procurement Strategy
Platform
Company
Commodity
Product
Supplier Identification
Search based on Strategy
Strategic, Integrated, Tactical
Selection Process
Classification
Desire to do Business with them
Establish Supplier Relationship
Capabilities
Commitment
Qualification
Audits
Finalize Business Negotiations
Contracts
POs
1st Articles
Logistics
Monitor Supplier Performance
QDC Metrics
Performance Scorecards
Supplier Development
QDC Metrics
DBS Tools
Continuous Cost Improvement
Process
Supplier Review
Review Process
Basic Reviews
Advanced Reviews
Reporting Performance
SCM
Organizational Levels in
the Procurement Process
SCM
Stock Overview
SCM
Materials
management
Supplier
Market
management
Manufacturer
Customer
Logistics Management
SCM
Supplier Identification
Risk Sharing / Trust
Present Snapshot
High
Outsourced
Partnerships
60%
Aggregated
Requirements
30%
Strategic
Integrated
Buy-Sell
10%
Tactical
Low
SCM
Value Analysis
Offers
1.
2.
3.
Procurement
Project
Price
Technical Specs
Lead Time
Price
Technical Specs
Duration
Management Approach
Past Experience
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Price
Technical Specs
Duration
Grade (1 to 7)
Past Experience
Relative Weight
Criticality Level (A, B, C, D) Safety, Process Effect, or Daily Rate
A Super Critical
SCM
B Critical
C Medium
D Normal
Criticality Analysis
Safety
Effect
Process
Effect
Major Effect
or
Financial
Effect
Minor Effect
Criticality
(System level)
HSE Effect
Major
(A)
Centrifugal Pump
Minor
Process
Effect
Major
(B)
Drain system
Water system
Steam system
Fire-fighting system
Non-Critical
Equipment
Standby
Availability
Without
(C)
SCM
With
(D)
- Safety effect
- Process effect
- Daily Rate ($/day)
Safety Effect
Major
(A)
Minor
Critical Project
Process
Effect
Major
(B)
Minor
Non-Critical
Project
Daily Rate
High
(C)
SCM
Low
(D)
Class (C)
Parameter
1.
Price
20
2. Technical Specs
3. Duration
SCM
Weight (point)
65%
4
(Fixed) ----
4. Grade (1 to 7)
5. Past Experience
6. Reputation
A
10
90
Criticality Level
B
C
D
20
35
50
80
65
50
or Min. Cost Rule
B = Critical
C= Medium
D= Normal
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
A 10
B 30
C 50
D 70
50
40
30
20
20
15
10
5
20
15
10
5
A= Catastrophic
B = Critical
C= Medium
D= Normal
SCM
Main Requirements:
Technical Proposal
Price Proposal
Management Approach Report
Past Experience Report
Submit a hard copy original with the signatures and one
copy for each
SCM
Case Study:
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
A 10
50
20
20
Case Study:
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
A 10
50
20
20
Case Study:
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
B 30
40
15
15
Case Study:
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
C 50
30
10
10
Case Study:
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
D 50
30
10
10
Parameter Description:
Parameter
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
10
Bad
Accepted
Good
Very Good
6 Minimum Requirements
SCM
Weight
0
Bad
Organization
Structure
Project Manager
Experience
Project Manager
is Certified
Project Team
Experience
Presentation On
Management
Approach
Evaluation
6
8
Accepted
Good
10
Very Good
6 Minimum Requirements
SCM
Weig
ht
0
Bad
Experience
None
Field
None
Scale
None
Evaluation
6
8
Accepted
Good
10
Very Good
6 Minimum Requirements
SCM
Weight
0
Bad
Evaluation
6
8
Accepted
Good
10
Very Good
6 Minimum Requirements
SCM
Honda Insight
Toyota Prius
Honda Civic
VW Deisel
Toyota Corolla
SCM
Toyota Echo
Toyota Scion XB
Toyota Celica
Matsushita
5% Sony
5% Honda
4%
Nissan
3%
Rest of firms
44%
Hitachi
3%
Toshiba
3%
NEC
3%
Other top 30
firms
19%
SCM
Cannon
2%
NTT
3%
Supplier / Vendor
Case Study:
Assume you have to buy 10 new similar car for oil company, and the
offers are as follows:
Item
Price (1000 LE)
Model / Year
BMW
Merc
Honda
Matrix
Opel
Toyota
260
400
140
100
130
140
Lancer Chery
110
50
2008
Incomplete Information
Technical evaluation Policy?
SCM
Case Study:
Assume you have to buy 10 new similar car for oil company, and the
offers are as follows:
Item
Price (1000 LE)
BMW
Merc
Honda
Matrix
Opel
Toyota
260
400
140
100
130
140
110
50
100
92
82
Model / Year
By Experience
Technical Weight %
Lancer Chery
2008
110
120
98
90
97
Case Study:
Assume you have to buy 10 new similar car for oil company, and the
offers are as follows:
Item
Price (1000 LE)
Technical points:
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Capacity
Brand & Style
Model / Year
BMW
260
Merc
400
Honda
140
9
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
9
8
9
8
9
9
Matrix Opel
100
130
Ref. # 123
7
9
7
8
9
9
8
8
7
8
7
9
2008
Toyota
140
8
8
10
9
8
9
Lancer Chery
110
50
7
7
8
8
8
7
5
6
9
4
7
5
Incomplete Information
Relative weights?
Equal weight?
Max. Budget ?
Based on this information, discuss & select the best Car.
SCM
Case Study:
Assume you have to buy 10 new similar car for oil company, and the offers are as follows:
Item
BMW Merc Honda Matrix Opel Toyota Lancer Chery
Price (1000 LE)
260
400
140
100
130
140
110
50
Technical par.
Safety/Stability
9
10
9
7
9
8
7
5
10
Options
10
8
7
8
8
7
6
Fuel consumption
9
9
9
9
9
10
8
9
Maintainability
10
10
8
8
8
9
8
4
Engine Capacity
10
10
9
7
8
8
8
7
Brand & Style
10
10
9
7
9
9
7
5
Model / Year
2008
Safety
Options
Weight
Fuel
con.
3
Maintainability
3
Engine
capacity
1
Brand &
Style
1
Item
Price (1000 LE)
Technical points:
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Capacity
Brand & Style
BMW
260
Merc
400
Honda
140
Matrix
100
Opel
130
Toyota
140
9
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
9
8
9
8
9
9
7
7
9
8
7
7
9
8
9
8
8
9
8
8
10
9
8
9
Lancer Chery
110
50
7
7
8
8
8
7
5
6
9
4
7
5
Safety
Options
Weight
Fuel
con.
3
Maintainability
3
Engine
capacity
1
Brand &
Style
1
Points
Item
Price (1000 LE)
Price points
Technical points:
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Capacity
Brand & Style
100
Weight
3
2
3
3
1
1
Tech. points
100
Proposal Evaluation:
0.5 *Tech. +0.5 * Price
0.6 *Tech. +0.4 * Price
0.7 *Tech. +0.3* Price
0.8 *Tech. +0.2 * Price
SCM
Honda
140
Opel
Toyota
140
130/140
= 93
130
130/130
=100
130/140
=93
9
8
9
8
9
9
112
9
8
9
8
8
9
111
8
8
10
9
8
9
114
112/114
= 98.2
111/114
= 97.4
114/114
=100
95.8
95.6
96.6
95.1
98.7
98.7
98.2
96.5
96.5
97.8
97.9
98.6
2) Analysis:
Item
Accepted offers
Rejected offers
Honda
Opel
Toyota
Price (1000LE)
140
140
Technical index %
98.2
130
97.4
Value Index %
95.1 %
97.9 %
98.6 %
100
Over budget
BMW
Merc.
Technical
Matrix
Lancer
Chery
Strength
points
Weakness
points
3) Recommendation:
SCM
3) Honda
Parameter
Safety/Stability
10
Options
10
Fuel consumption
10
Maintainability
10
Engine Capacity
10
10
Rejected
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
Specific
Measurable
Relative Weights:
Parameter
Safety
Options
Weight
SCM
Fuel
con.
3
Maintainability
3
Engine
capacity
1
Brand &
Style
1
Safety
Options
Weight
Fuel
con.
3
Maintainability
3
Engine
capacity
1
Brand &
Style
1
Item
Price (1000 LE)
Technical par.
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Capacity
Brand & Style
Model / Year
BMW
260
Merc
400
Honda
140
Matrix
100
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
8
10
8
10
8
6
6
10
8
8
8
Opel
130
8
8
10
8
8
8
2008
Toyota
140
Lancer Chery
110
50
8
8
10
10
8
8
6
6
8
8
8
6
0
6
8
0
8
0
Safety
Options
Weight
Fuel
con.
3
Maintainability
3
Engine
capacity
1
Brand &
Style
1
Points
Item
Price (1000 LE)
Price points
Technical points:
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Capacity
Brand & Style
Toyota
140
130/140
= 93
130/140
=93
8
8
10
8
10
8
8
8
10
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
8
8
112
110
116
100
112/116=
96.5
110/116=
94.8
116/116=
100
100
100
93
96.5
100
94.8
100
95.80
95.84
93
100
98.6
100
Tech. points
SCM
Opel
130
130/130
=100
R. weight
3
2
3
3
1
1
Proposal Evaluation:
Price points
Tech. points
0.8 *Tech. +0.2 * Price
Honda
140
2) Analysis:
Item
Accepted offers
Rejected offers
Honda
Opel
Toyota
Price (1000LE)
140
140
Technical index %
96.5
130
94.8
Over budget
Technical
Matrix
Lancer
Chery
BMW
Merc.
100
Value Index %
Strength
points
Weakness
points
3) Recommendation:
SCM
2)
3)
Parameter
Price $M
10
Technical Approach
10
Management Approach
10
Past Performance
10
Rejected
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
Specific
Measurable
6 Minimum Requirements
SCM
Project / Contractor
Case Study:
5 Proposals
B
C
Price $M
7.0
7.5
8.0
9.0
10.0
Technical
Approach
8/10
8/10
8/10
10/10
10/10
Management
Approach
6/10
6/10
8/10
8/10
10/10
Past
Performance
0/10
6/10
8/10
8/10
10/10
Parameter
Evaluation rules:
6 Minimum Requirements
Maximum budget = $ 9 M
Management Approach:
0
Bad
CRITERION
1) Organisation Structure
2) Leader Skills (CVs)
3) Worker Skills (CVs)
4) QC/QA Management
5) Safety Management
6) Resources Mobilisation
7) Documentation Quality
8) Quality Manual
9) Quality of the Co-ordination
10) Quality of the Support Action
Overall score 100 Points
10 Points
SCM
6
Fair
8
Good
10
Very Good
A
6
6
10
8
6
6
6
6
0
6
60
B
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
10
0
6
60
C
6
8
10
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
80
D
10
8
8
8
8
6
10
8
6
8
80
E
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
100
10
Past Experience:
0
Bad
Non
SCM
6
Fair
Ok
but not in the
same field
Different Scale
8
Good
Ok
& in the same
field
Different Scale
10
Very Good
Ok
& Petroleum
contractor
Same Scale
Price $M
7.0
7.5
Technical
Approach
8/10
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
Proposals
C
8.0
9.0
10.0
(over $)
8/10
8/10
10/10
10/10
6/10
6/10
8/10
8/10
10/10
0/10
(not)
6/10
8/10
8/10
10/10
Evaluation rules:
Maximum budget = $ 9 M
Relative Weight :
Total Index
Price
Technical
Approach
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
A 10
50
20
20
Proposals
C
Price $M
10*7.5/8.0=
9.375
10*7.5/9.0=
8.333
Technical
Approach
8/10
8/10
10/10
Management
Approach
6/10
8/10
8/10
Past
Performance
6/10
8/10
8/10
Total Index
Proposals
C
Price $M
10
9.375
8.333
Technical
Approach
10
Management
Approach
Past
Performance
Total Index
7.4
8.14
9.03
The best offer
2) Analysis:
Item
Description
Strength
points
Weakness
points
3) Recommendation:
SCM
Exam: Assume you have to buy a new crane 300 ton, and the offers are as follows:
Item
A
B
C
D
E
Initial cost (M $)
1.5
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.2
Life, year
12
12
10
8
10
Salvage (% initial cost)
15%
15%
12%
10%
12%
Technical parameters
Safety/Stability
10
10
8
6
8
Options
8
10
8
6
8
Fuel consumption
10
10
10
8
8
Maintainability
10
10
8
8
8
Engine Type
10
10
8
6
8
Brand & Style
8
10
8
0
0
Weight matrix (relative priority from 1 to 4):
Parameter
Safety
Options
Fuel
con.
Weight
4
2
2
Evaluation rules: Maximum budget = 1.5 M$
Technical weight 80%
Maintainability
3
Engine
type
2
Brand &
Style
1
B is over budget
Item
Annual Depreciation (SL)
Price points
Technical parameters
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Type
Brand & Style
0.1063
0.1232
100
100
86.24
4
2
2
3
2
1
10
8
10
10
10
8
134
8
8
10
8
8
8
116
100
100
100
86.57
86.5
Tech. points
0.8 *Tech. +0.2 * Price
D E
Or
B is over budget
Item
Annual Present Worth
Price points
Technical parameters
Safety/Stability
Options
Fuel consumption
Maintainability
Engine Type
Brand & Style
D E
100
4
2
2
3
2
1
10
8
10
10
10
8
134
8
8
10
8
8
8
116
100
100
86.57
Tech. points
0.8 *Tech. +0.2 * Price
2) Analysis:
Item
Accepted offers
Rejected offers
Over budget
Technical
Weakness Points
3) Recommendation:
SCM
2) C
2) Analysis:
Item
Accepted offers
A
1.5
C
1.4
100
100
86.57
86.5
Rejected offers
Over budget
Technical
B
1.8 M$
D,E
(0) Brand
& Style
Strength Points
Weakness Points
3) Recommendation:
SCM
2) C
SCM
Sales rep.
Supplier
Order
Customer info
Quote
ERP
Purchase order
Plant
Production order
Accounting
General ledger
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
Value Chain
SCM
SCM
First-Tier Supplier
Service/Product Provider
Support Processes
Support Processes
New Service/
Product
Development
Process
Supplier
Relationship
Process
Business-toBusiness
(B2B)
Customer
Relationship
Process
OrderFulfillment
Process
New Service/
Product
Development
Process
Supplier
Relationship
Process
Business-toCustomer
(B2C)
Customer
Relationship
Process
OrderFulfillment
Process
External Consumers
External Suppliers
SCM
Step #1
Supply Chain
Initial Suppliers
Tier 4
--
Tier 3
Tier 2
Tier 1
Manufacturer - XX
Egypt
Tier 1
Tier 2
SCM
--
Assembly
-
Egypt
End Users
Customer
Step #1
Customer
Customer
Distribution
center
Distribution
center
Supply Chain
Customer
Manufacturer
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Supplier of services
SCM
Supplier of materials
Step #2
Inefficient
supply chain
operations
Area of
improved
operations
Total costs
Benchmarking
Reduce costs
New supply chain
efficiency curve with
changes in design
and execution
8
Supply chain performance
(Inventory Turnover)
Improve
performance
Current
Situation
10
Internal
Benchmark
15
External
Benchmark
SCM Outline
Step #3
Tier 2
Tier 1
Suppliers
Suppliers
Tier 1
Company
Tier 2
Customers Customers
SCM
SCM Outline
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 1
Suppliers
Suppliers
Company
Tier 2
Customers Customers
SCM
Information Flow
Tier 2
Tier 1
Suppliers
Suppliers
Tier 1
Company
Tier 2
Customers Customers
Site
SCM
Supply Chain
Suppliers
Vendors
Company
Contractor
Customer
Client
Site
SCM
SCM
Suppliers
Company
Customer
Vendors
Contractor
Client
SCM
Information
Suppliers
Vendors
Orders
Materials
Company
Orders
Customer
Contractor
Product
Client
Payments
Payments
03 Information
04
Suppliers
09
Vendors
Materials
05
08
Orders
10
01Information
06
07
Company
Contractor
Product
15
Payments
14
12
Client
MainContractor
11
Subcontractor
Customers
Orders
13
Payments
Report List
ID
Report / Form
Description
Responsibility
Information
01
Customer Needs
02
Product Analysis
03
Price Quotation
04
Supplier Offers
05
06
Offer
Orders
07
Customer order
08
Order Analysis
09
Material Orders
11
Production Orders
12
Product
Payments
13
Customer Payments
14
Cost Analysis
15
Supplier Payments
SCM
03
SCM
02
01
Report List
ID
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SCM
Report / Form
Description
Responsibility
SCM
Report List
ID
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SCM
Report / Form
Description
Responsibility
SCM
Report List
ID
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SCM
Report / Form
Description
Responsibility
SCM
Report List
ID
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SCM
Report / Form
Description
Responsibility
Process Chart
Inputs:
Request
Departments:
Enterprise Applications
Reports:
Order
SCM
Invoice
Process Chart
Inputs:
Request
Departments:
Enterprise Applications
Reports:
Order
SCM
Invoice
ID
Form/report
Responsibility
1
2
3
4
5
--
SCM
Who
Target /
Purpose
When/
Frequency
Type/
Method
Reference
SCM - Outline
Main Information:
1.
Coding System
2.
Product Information
3.
Product Structure
4.
Process Information
5.
Material Information
6.
Manpower Information
7.
Machines Information
8.
Operating Information
9.
Cost Information
SCM
Planning Process:
1. Master Plan
2. Material Plans
3. Resource Plans
4. Cost Plan
5. Production Plans
6. Work Orders
SCM
Control Process:
1. Actual Performance
2. Quantity Analysis
3. Cost Analysis
4. Productivity Analysis
5. Capacity Analysis
6. Time Analysis
7. Quality Analysis
8. KPIs report
SCM
Forecasting Process:
1. Market Forecasting
2. Capacity Forecasting
3. Resource Forecasting
4. Quantity Forecasting
5. Time Forecasting
6. Procurement Forecasting
7. Cost & Budget Forecasting
SCM
SCM
Block Diagram
Tools & Approaches
Inputs Information
1.
General information
2.
Coding Information
3.
Customer Information
4.
Supplier Information
5.
Market Information
6.
Product Information
7.
Product Structure
8.
Process Information
9.
Material Information
SCM
1.
Material Flow
Analysis
2. Material Req.
Planning
3. Manpower Req. Pl.
4. Machine Req. Pl.
5. Cost Price
Estimation
6. Cost Analysis
7. Production
Schedule
8. Productivity
Analysis
9. Capacity Analysis
10. Performance
Evaluation
11. Forecasting
Outputs Information
1.
Master Plan
2.
3.
Material Plan
4.
Manpower Plan
5.
6.
7.
Procurement Plan
8.
Cost Estimation
9.
Budget Plan
10.
Cost Analysis
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
KPIs report
19.
20.
Case Study
Supply Chain Management
For a Manufacturing Company
SCM
Case Study
Supply Chain - Estimation & Planning Module
Product
X
Material
A1 (80%)
A1 Cast Iron Scrap
SCM
Material
A2 (15%)
A2 Steel Scrap
Material
A3 (5%)
A3 Special Scrap
3) Supplier Information:
Mat.
ID
Supplier
ID
Unit price
(LE/ton)
Raw
Material
Defect %
Standard
Lot Size
(ton)
Lead
time
(day)
Transportation
cost
(LE/order)
A1
A2
A3
A11111
B11111
C11111
1000
1500
3000
15%
10%
5%
50
30
20
2
3
4
500
400
300
Open
Inventory
(ton)
Safety
Stock
Schedule
Receipt
(ton)
Maximum
Inventory Level
(ton)
Average
Holding Cost
(LE/ton/year)
A1
A2
A3
20
15
10
One week
One week
One week
50
30
20
150
100
50
200
200
200
7) Process Information:
Process
ID
Process
description
Defect
ratio
%
Crew
Size
(man)
Effort
Max. No.
Man-hour of Crew
Per Ton
Process
Cost rate
LE/ton
Melting Process
10%
13
10
300
Molding Process
15%
20
10
200
Machining Process
10%
45
20
350
Finishing Process
2%
20
10
100
8) Working conditions:
Process
ID
Process description
No. of
Shifts / day
Hour /
Shift
Time
Tolerance
%
Melting Process
10
Molding Process
10
Machining Process
10
Finishing Process
10
20
SCM
Process Chart
Standard rates based on 100 ton final product
Material Estimation & Analysis
Material Cost Estimation & Analysis
Process Cost Estimation & Analysis
Total Cost Estimation & Analysis
Re-order Level Analysis
Weekly Material Plan based on Lot-for-Lot rule
Weekly Material Plan based on Reorder level rule
Process Crew Plan
Weekly Production Schedule
Work In Process (WIP) Analysis
Chain Time Analysis
Chain Cost Analysis
Key Indicators & KPIs Report
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
1- Process Chart:
Process
Input
Output
Suppliers
A1
x
A2
x
A3
x
SCM
Final
Product
B
x
C
x
D
x
E
x
Customers
Raw Materials
Input
Process
Output
Losses
Material Analysis:
L%
Suppliers
A1(0.8)
15%
A2(0.15)
10%
A3(0.05)
5%
SCM
Final
Product
B
10
%
C
15
%
D
10
%
E
2
%
Customers
Raw Materials
Input
Process
Losses
L%
I = O / (1-L)
xx
A1(0.8) xx
15%
xx
xx
A2(0.15) xx
10%
xx
xx
Output
Losses
xx
B
10
%
xx
xx
C xx
15
%
D
10
%
xx
xx
E 100 ton
2
%
xx
xx
A3(0.05) xx
5%
xx
SCM
Input
Process
Losses
L%
I = O / (1-L)
Output
X=I-O
A1(0.8) x
15%
Losses
A2(0.15) x
10%
B
10
%
C x
15
%
D
10
%
102.
04
E 100 ton
2
%
A3(0.05) x
5%
2.04
x
SCM
Input
Process
Losses
L%
I = O / (1-L)
Output
X=I-O
A1(0.8) x
15%
Losses
A2(0.15) x
10%
B
10
%
C 113.
15 78
%
D
10
%
102.
04
E 100 ton
2
%
A3(0.05) x
5%
11.33
2.04
x
SCM
Input
Process
Losses
L%
I = O / (1-L)
Output
A1(0.8) x
15%
Losses
20.92
A2(0.15) x
10%
148.
19
B
10
%
133. C 113.
37 15 37
%
D
10
%
102.
04
E 100 ton
2
%
2.47
A3(0.05) x
5%
0.39
SCM
14.82
20.0
11.33
2.04
Input
Process
Losses
L%
I = O / (1-L)
139.47
Output
A1(0.8) 118.55
15%
Losses
20.92
24.7
A2(0.15 22.23
)
10%
148.
19
B
10
%
133. C 113.
37 15 37
%
D
10
%
102.
04
E 100 ton
2
%
2.47
A3(0.05 7.41
)
5%
7.8
0.39
SCM
14.82
20.0
11.33
2.04
Yield Analysis
Gross
Requirements
A1 139.47
A2 24.7
A1 80
A3 7.8
A1 59.47
A2 9.7
Yield %:
100 ton
Prod. System
Losses
A2 15
A3 5
A3 2.8
A1 57.36
A2 60.72
A3 64.10
SCM
Process
Input
Output
Time
Time Analysis:
Suppliers
A1
x
A2
x
A3
x
SCM
Final
Product
B
x
C
x
D
x
E
x
Customers
Process
Input
Output
WIP
WIP Analysis:
Suppliers
A1
x
A2
x
A3
x
SCM
Final
Product
B
x
C
x
D
x
E
x
Customers
Raw Materials
Process
Input
Output
WIP
Crew Analysis:
Standard Quantity = 100 ton
Suppliers
A1
x
A2
x
A3
x
SCM
Final
Product
B
x
C
x
D
x
E
x
Customers
Raw Materials
Process
Input
Output
Cost
Suppliers
A1
x
A2
x
A3
x
SCM
Final
Product
B
x
C
x
D
x
E
x
Customers
Raw Materials
Input
Output
Losses
Process
A1(0.8) 4742.64
L%
Losses
15%
836.93
988.05
4000
98.81
312.02
A3(0.05) 296.42
592.84
800.32
453.51
81.632
5%
15.6
SCM
ton
A2 24.7
ton
A3 7.8
ton
Total
= 171.97 ton
A2 24.7
* 40
= 988.04
A3 7.8
* 40
= 312.00
Total
SCM
5579.44
ton
ton
ton
= 6879.48 ton
A2 24.7 * 1500
A3 7.8 * 3000
5,578,800 LE
A2 37059 * 40
1,482,000
A3 23400 * 40
936,000
Total =
Process Scrap Quantity = 48.19 ton/100 ton final *40 = 1927.6 ton
SCM
A2 24.7 * 1500
A3 7.8 * 3000
5,578,800 LE
A2 37059 * 40
1,482,000
A3 23400 * 40
936,000
Material Cost =
Number of orders:
A1 5579.44 / 50 = 111.5 = 112 order * 500 = 56,000 LE
A2 988.04 /30
A3 312.00 /20
4,800
SCM
Material Cost
7,996,800 LE
+ Transportation Cost =
74,000 LE
SCM
Process
description
Process Inputs
Ton /100 final
Ton/4000
Process
Cost rate
LE/ton
Melting Process
148.19
300
Molding Process
133.37
200
Machining
Process
113.37
350
Finishing Process
102.04
100
SCM
Total
Process
cost
Process
description
Process Inputs
Ton /100 final
Ton/4000
Melting Process
148.19
5927.6
300
1,778,280
Molding Process
133.37
5334.8
200
1,660,960
Machining
Process
113.37
4534.8
350
1,587,180
Finishing Process
102.04
4081.6
100
408,160
SCM
4,884,580
Total direct
cost
Machine cost
Subcontractor cost
Manufacturing
cost
Total cost
Or
+
+
Technical
overhead
Office
overhead
Profit
Price
Price Total Cost = Profit
SCM
= 5% manufacturing cost
Inventory level
Q
R
d*LT
SS
LT
LT
Time
R = Reorder Point
LT = Lead Time
SCM
SS =Safety Stock
d = Demand rate
Q = Order Quantity
Mat.
ID
SS =Safety Stock
d = Demand rate
Open
Annual Standard Lead
time
Inventory
quantity Lot Size
(ton)
L (day)
(ton)
(ton)
Safety
Stock
(SS)
A1
A2
A3
5579.44
988.04
312.00
Mat.
ID
Annual
quantity
(ton)
Average
weekly
demand
(ton/week)
Average
Daily
Demand
d (ton/day)
Safety
Stock
(SS)
A1
A2
A3
5579.44
988.04
312.00
107.29
19.00
6.00
21.45
3.80
1.20
107
19
6
SCM
50
30
20
2
3
4
20
15
10
Q = Order Quantity
One week
One week
One week
Schedule Maximum
Receipt
Inventory
(ton)
Level (ton)
50
30
20
150
100
50
d*L
Reorder
level
End
Inventory
(ton)
42.9=43
11.24
4.8
150
31
11
R =150
Q= 50
d*L = 43
SS = 107
LT=2
LT=2
Time
SCM
Part A1
Duration unit
Daily
Planning Period
10 days
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
Open Orders
Project on Hand
Open Inventory
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Receipt date =
Order Release
SCM
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
20
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Order Release
SCM
Lot-For-Lot
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
70
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
48
26
Net Requirements
18
Order Receipt
Order Release
Lot-For-Lot
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
70
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
48
26
Net Requirements
18
Order Receipt
50
Order Release
Lot-For-Lot
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
70
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
48
26
Net Requirements
18
Order Receipt
50
Order Release
50
Lot-For-Lot
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
70
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
48
26
54
32
10
Net Requirements
18
12
Order Receipt
50
50
Order Release
50
50
Lot-For-Lot
Weekly Plan
Day
Part A1
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
70
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
48
26
54
32
60
38
16
Net Requirements
18
12
Order Receipt
50
50
Order Release
50
50
-3
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
20
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Order Release
Reorder Level
Weekly Plan
Day
Part A1
-3
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
70
Net Requirements
80
Order Receipt
100
Order Release
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
100
Reorder Level
Weekly Plan
Day
Part A1
-3
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
170
148
Net Requirements
80
Order Receipt
100
50
Order Release
100
50
Reorder Level
Weekly Plan
Day
Part A1
-3
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
176
154
132
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
170
198
Net Requirements
80
18
Order Receipt
100
50
50
Order Release
100
50
50
Reorder Level
Weekly Plan
Day
Part A1
-3
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
176
154
182
160
138
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
170
198
Net Requirements
80
18
12
Order Receipt
100
50
50
50
Order Release
100
50
50
50
Reorder Level
Weekly Plan
Day
Part A1
-3
-2
-1
Gross Requirements
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
160
188 166
Schedule Receipt
50
Project on Hand
170
198 176
Net Requirements
80
18
12
Order Receipt
100
50
50
50
Order Release
100
50
154 182
50
50
Process
description
Defect
ratio
%
Crew
Size
(man)
Effort
Max. No.
Man-hour of Crew
Per Ton
Melting Process
10%
13
10
Molding Process
15%
20
10
Machining Process
10%
45
20
Finishing Process
2%
20
10
Working conditions:
Process
ID
Process description
No. of
Shifts / day
Hour /
Shift
Time
Tolerance
%
Melting Process
10
Molding Process
10
Machining Process
10
Finishing Process
1
10
20
Supply Chain Management for Engineers
SCM
Crew Plan:
Process Information:
Process Process description
ID
Crew
Size
(man)
Effort
Man-hour
Per Ton
Max.
No. of
Crew
Input
Quantity
Ton/4000
Melting Process
13
10
5927.6
Molding Process
20
10
5334.8
Machining Process
45
20
4534.8
Finishing Process
20
10
4081.6
SCM
Daily
No. of Crew
Crew Plan:
Process Information:
Process
ID
M=
Crew
Size
(man)
13
10
5927.6
20
10
5334.8
45
20
4534.8
20
10
4081.6
SCM
X= Daily
Quantity
Q/(52*5)
= Q/260
Y=Hourl
y rate
Ton/hr
(X/8 hr)
No. of
Crew
Y.Z/M
Process
ID
M=
Crew
Size
(man)
13
10
148.19
20
15
133.37
45
30
113.37
20
15
102.04
SCM
Q=Input
Quantity
Ton/100
Duration
Q.E/M
(hr/100)
Time Analysis:
Process
Input
Output
Time
Suppliers
A1
x
A2
x
Final
Product
B
x
C
x
D
x
E
x
A3
x
SCM
Customers
Raw Materials
Time Analysis
Process Process description
ID
Crew
Size
(man)
Effort
Man-hour
Per Ton
Input
Quantity
Melting Process
13
148.19*40=
Molding Process
20
133.37*40=
Machining Process
45
113.37*40=
Finishing Process
20
SCM
Daily
No. of Crew
Time Analysis:
Input
Process
Output
Time
139.47
24.7
A2(0.15) 22.23
7.8
A3(0.05) 7.41
SCM
148.
19
133. C
37
113.
37
102.
04
E 100 ton
Time Analysis
Must have D and E
completed here so
production can
begin on B
Start production of D
1 week
2 weeks to
produce
2 weeks
2 weeks
1 week
1 week
2 weeks
3 weeks
1 week
SCM
4
5
Time in weeks
Figure 14.4
Inventory Analysis
SCM
Cost Analysis
SCM
Key Indicators
SCM
Unit
Strength Points:
-
Weakness Points:
-
Area of Concern:
-
Recommendations:
-
Conclusion:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SCM
Case Study
Supply Chain Management
For a Manufacturing Company
SCM
2) Product Structure
1) Process Information:
ID
Process description
Resource
type
A, B
Parts procurement
Outdoor
Product assembly /
construction
Indoor
Product testing
Indoor
Product finishing
Indoor
Process description
B(2)
Part
ID
Open
inventory
(unit)
Lead
time
(day)
Unit price
($/unit)
Standard
lot size
(unit)
Part
defect
ratio %
A
B
14
17
3
2
500
250
15
20
10%
15%
5) Machine information:
4) Manpower information:
ID
A(3)
3) Material Information:
man-hour
/unit
Crew size
(man)
$/
man-day
Welding Process
(Eq-hour/unit)
Process
defect
ratio %
Product assembly
50
80
80
50
10%
Product testing
30
100
40
60
7%
Product Finishing
10
120
--
3%
&
10 hour/shift
Weekend: Friday
Office o. head 10% manufacturing cost
SCM
SCM
Process
description
Defect
%
A,
B
Parts procurement
10
15
Product assembly
10
Product testing
Product finishing
C
A(3)
xx
B(2)
I = O / (1-L)
Process
Output
Defect /
Losses (L)
xx
A(3) xx
10%
xx
xx
Input
B(2)
15%
xx
C xx
10%
D
7%
xx
E
3%
Q=30
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
SCM
120
A(3) 109
10%
11
84
B(2)
15%
36.34
C 33.063
10%
D
7%
30.90
E
3%
30
72
3.3063
2.163
12
A 120
B 84
Prod. System
Losses
0.90
30 Final Product
A 3*30 = 90
B 2*30 = 60
A 120 -90 = 30
B 84- 60 = 24
120
A(3) 109
10%
11
84
B(2)
15%
36.34
C 33.063
10%
D
7%
30.90
E
3%
30
72
3.3063
2.163
0.90
12
ID
Process description
Defect
ratio %
Input
Output
Yield
Part (A)
10%
120
109
90.83 %
Part (B)
15%
84
72
85.71 %
Product assembly
10%
Product testing
7%
A 109
B 72
33.063
3*33.063
2*33.063
30.90
92.56
91.84
93.47
Product Finishing
3%
30.90
30
97.09
A 120
B 84
3*30
2*30
90/120= 75.00 %
60/84 = 71.42 %
Total
SCM
Process description
Duration= 10 day
Man-hour
/unit
Crew size
(man)
Daily
hours
Unit/
day
Product assembly
50
10
Product testing
30
10
Product Finishing
10
10
No. of
crews
No. of
Workers
Total
SCM
Duration= 10 day
Manhour
/unit
Crew
size
(man)
Daily
hours
Unit/
day
Product assembly
50
10
Product testing
30
10
Product Finishing
10
10
ID
Process description
Required
daily
hours
Daily
workers
No. of
crews
Actual
daily
workers
Total
ID
Process description
Product assembly
Product testing
Product Finishing
No. of crews
Actual
daily workers
Utilization
> 80 %
Total
SCM
Duration= 10 day
Manhour
/unit
Crew
size
(man)
Daily
hours
Unit/
day
Required
daily
hours
Daily
workers
No. of
crews
Actual
daily
workers
Product assembly
50
10
50*3=150
150/10=15
15/4=3.75
=4
4*4=16
Product testing
30
10
30*3=90
90/10=9
9/3=3
3*3=9
Product Finishing
10
10
10*3=30
30/10=3
3/2=1.5
=2
2*2=4
ID
Process description
29
Total
ID
Process description
No. of crews
Actual Daily
workers
Th.
daily
workers
Utilization
> 80 %
Product assembly
16
15
15/16= 94 %
Product testing
9/9= 100%
Product Finishing
3/4=75 %
Total
SCM
29
Process description
Duration= 10 day
Eq-hour
/unit
Daily
hours
Unit/
day
Product assembly
80
10
Product testing
40
10
Product Finishing
10
Required
daily hours
No. of M/c
Per day
Total
ID
Process description
Product assembly
Product testing
Product Finishing
Utilization
> 80 %
Total
SCM
Process description
Duration= 10 day
Eq-hour
/unit
Daily
hours
Unit/
day
Required
daily hours
No. of M/c
Per day
Actual No. of
M/c Per day
Product assembly
80
10
80*3=240
240/10=24
24
Product testing
40
10
40*3=120
120/10=12
12
Product Finishing
10
36
Total
ID
Process description
Utilization
> 80 %
Product assembly
24
24/24 = 100 %
Product testing
12
12/12= 100 %
Product Finishing
Total
SCM
36
Total direct
cost
Machine cost
Subcontractor cost
Manufacturing
cost
Total cost
Or
+
+
Technical
overhead
Office
overhead
Profit
Price
Price Total Cost = Profit
SCM
Direct cost:
Material cost
Labor cost
Machine cost
Manufacturing cost
Technical overhead
= -- % direct cost
Office overhead
= -- % manuf. cost
Total cost = C
Unit Cost = Total Cost / Quantity
Unit Price = -- LE/unit
Profit = R C
Value Added = R ER
Margin Factor =R DC
Ratio = Profit/R
Ratio = VA/R
Ratio = MF/R
SCM
Material Cost:
ID
Process description
Unit price
($/unit)
Total units
Material Cost
Part (A)
500
120
500*120 =60000
Part (B)
250
84
250*84=21000
Total
81000
Labor Cost:
ID
Process description
$/
man-day
Actual
daily workers
Daily
Labor cost
Total
Labor cost
Product assembly
80
16
1280
1280*10= 12800
Product testing
100
900
900*10=9000
Product Finishing
120
480
480*10= 4800
2260
22,600
Total
Machine Cost:
ID
Process description
Depreciation
($/hour)
Daily hours
No. of M/c
Per day
Daily
Machine cost
Total
Machine cost
Product assembly
50
10
24
24*10*50= 12000
12000*10=120000
Product testing
60
10
12
12*10*60= 7200
7200*10=72000
Product Finishing
--
10
--
--
36
19200
192,000
Total
SCM
Material cost
81000
Labor cost
22,600
Machine cost
192,000
Manufacturing cost
295,600*1.2 = 354720
+
+
Technical overhead
= 20% direct cost
Office overhead
= 10% manuf. cost
Value Added = R ER
= 450000 81000
= + 369000
= + 450 %ER
Margin Factor = R DC
= 450000 295,600
= + 154400
= + 52.2 %DC
Total
Per unit
Material cost
= 81000
= 2700 LE/unit
Labor cost
= 22600
= 753 LE/unit
= 6400 LE/unit
9853 LE/unit
1971 LE/unit
= 13006 LE/unit
Calculation
Value
Unit
9853
LE/unit
11824
LE/unit
Unit overhead
3153
LE/unit
2700
LE/unit
Unit cost
13006
LE/unit
Unit price
Given
15,000
LE/unit
Unit profit
+ 1994
LE/unit
Value added
SCM
13.3
+ 5147
LE/unit
%
34.3%
+ 12300
LE/unit
%
82%
Planning Process:
1. Master Plan
2. Material Plans
3. Resource Plans
4. Cost Plan
5. Production Plans
6. Work Orders
SCM
Part A
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
Open Orders = 0
Project on Hand
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Receipt date
Order Release
SCM
Day
-3
-2
-1
1
12
14
2
10
15
2
12
3
12
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Order Release
SCM
5
12
6
12
8
12
9
12
10
12
11
12
10
12
11
12
15
Lead time = 3 day
Part A
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
Project on Hand
4
12
Day
-3
-2
-1
1
12
14
2
15
17
10
15
2
12
3
12
4
12
5
12
6
12
8
12
9
12
15
Day/ Month
Part A
30/
12
31/
12
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
Project on Hand
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Order Release
1/
1
14
15
15
+
15
SCM
A 120/10 = 12 unit/day
2/
1
12
3/
1
12
4/
1
12
5/
1
12
6/
1
12
7/
1
12
8/
1
2+
15
5+
15
8+
15
11+
15
14
2+
15
17
10
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
9/
1
12
10
/1
11/1
12/1
12
12
12
5+
15
8+
15
14
10
11+
15
1
15
15
15
15
15
+
15
Day/ Month
31/
12
Gross Requirements
Schedule Receipt
Project on Hand
Net Requirements
Order Receipt
Order Release
1/
1
17
2/
1
9
3/
1
9
4/
1
9
5/
1
9
6/
1
9
7/
1
9
8/
1
6+
20
3
17
8+
20
1
19
10
1+
20
8
20
20
20
20
20
20
9/
1
9
12
10/
1
11/1
12/
1
3+
20
6
14
10
20
20
Material Analysis:
Part
ID
Open
inventory
(unit)
Total quantity
(unit)
Used quantity
(unit)
End
inventory
(unit)
Utilization factor % =
Total / Used
14
120
14
120/134= 89.55 %
17
84
10
84/97= 86.6 %
SCM
Day/ Month
30/12
31/12
1/
1
15
30
2/
1
15
20
20
3/
1
4/
1
15
A 500 LE/unit
5/
1
6/
1
15
7/
1
30
20
20
B 250 LE/unit
Day/ Month
30/12
31/12
7500
15000
2/
1
7500
5000
5000
20000
12500
7500
1/
1
3/
1
4/
1
7500
7500
5/
1
6/
1
7500
7/
1
15000
5000
5000
12500
20000
Process description
man-hour
/unit
Product assembly
50
Lot size
(unit/day)
3
No. of
crews
4
Cycle time =
(Operating time/day) / (Output rate/day)
50 / ( 3 * 4) = 4.1 hour/unit
Product testing
30
Product Finishing
10
Total
P
#
Day #1
1
Day #2
7
10
10
10
1
2
3
P
#
Day #3
1
Day #4
7
10
C
D
E
SCM
Process description
man-hour
/unit
Product assembly
50
Lot size
(unit/day)
3
No. of
crews
4
Cycle time =
(Operating time/day) / (Output rate/day)
50 / ( 3 * 4) = 4.1 hour/unit
Product testing
30
Product Finishing
10
Total
Day #1
1
#1
Day #2
7
10
#4
#5
#1
#2
#3
#4
#2
#3
Day #3
3
#3
#1
#2
#4
Day #4
7
10
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#4
SCM
#5
10
#6
#7
#8
10
#9
Day #6
7
10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
Day #7
1
#14
Day #8
7
10
#16
#17
#18
#19
#20
#15
#16
#17
#18
#19
#14
#15
#16
#17
#18
Day #9
1
Day #10
7
10
#21
#22
#23
#24
#25
#20
#21
#22
#23
#24
#19
SCM
#20
10
#19
10
#21
#22
#23
10
#24
Day #12
7
10
#26
#27
#28
#29
#30
#25
#26
#27
#28
#29
#24
#25
#26
#27
#28
Day #13
1
10
#31
#32
#33
#30
#31
#32
#29
#30
10
#33
#31
#32
#33
Production Plan:
Working Day #
#29
Day #14
10
10 11 12 13 14
30/
12
31/
12
1/
1
2/
1
3/
1
4/
1
5/
1
6/
1
7/
1
8/
1
9/
1
10
/1
11
/1
12
/1
13
/1
14
/1
Final Product
Cumulative production
11
13
16
18
21
23
26
28
31
33
Date
Customer
SCM
Process description
man-hour
/unit
Product assembly
50
Lot size
(unit/day)
3
No. of
crews
4
Cycle time =
(Operating time/day) / (Output rate/day)
50 / ( 3 * 4) = 4.1 hour/unit
Product testing
30
Product Finishing
10
Total
P
#
Day #1
1
Day #2
7
10
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
SCM
Control Process:
1. Actual Performance
2. Quantity Analysis
3. Cost Analysis
4. Productivity Analysis
5. Capacity Analysis
6. Time Analysis
7. Quality Analysis
8. KPIs report
SCM
Short description:
Client: xxxx
Unit Price: $ 15000
KPIs:
Performance Indicator
Unit Cost
Profit
$/unit
%
Value Added
Time
OEE
13.3%
34.3%
8
10
Day
Capacity Utilization
13006
40
Quality rate
Target
Actual
12500
16.6
97
%
%
%
99
75
65
80
70
Subject Description:
Scope of work:
Planned Price:
Contract:
Actual Price:
Planned cost:
Client:
Actual cost:
Analysis:
Strength
points
123-
Weakness
points
123-
Area of
Concern
123-
Recommendation:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCM
2) Product Structure
X
1) Process Information:
ID
Process description
Resource
type
A, B, C
Parts procurement
Outdoor
P1
Product assembly /
construction
Indoor
P2
Product testing
Indoor
P3
Product finishing
Indoor
3) Material Information:
A(3)
B(2)
C(1)
Part
ID
Open
inventory
(unit)
Lead
time
(day)
Unit price
($/unit)
Standard
lot size
(unit)
Part
defect
ratio %
A
B
C
40
120
80
2
3
4
500
300
100
30
40
50
10%
10%
5%
4) Manpower information:
5) Machine information:
ID
Process
description
manhour
/unit
Crew
size
(man)
$/
manday
Bonus
$/
man-hour
Welding M/c
(Eq-hour/unit)
Process
defect
ratio %
P1
Product assembly
60
100
25
40
50
10%
P2
Product testing
40
120
30
20
60
8%
P3
Product Finishing
20
130
35
--
2%
&
10 hour/shift
Weekend: Friday
Office o. head 10% manufacturing cost
SCM
Reference Books:
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid21_gci1125310,00.html
http://scrc.ncsu.edu/index.html
http://www.cio.com/research/scm/edit/012202_scm.html
http://www.crmbuyer.com/story/21546.html
http://www.supply-chain.org/index.ww
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_chain_management
Supply Chain Council, Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, version 7.0,
www.scc.org
SCM
Discussion
Suggestions
Comments
Questions
Copyrights & More Information:
Dr. Attia Hussien Gomaa
Industrial Engineering Professor & Consultant
attiagomaa@yahoo.com or 0101598@aucegypt.edu
Tel: 0122738497
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM
SCM