Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
Introduction:
1
Body:
The conventional energy paradigm is clearly incapable of solving these
significant political and social problems. This situation has called for a
paradigm shift in energy policy. As a matter of fact, a paradigm shift in the
objectives of energy policy is currently taking place - towards security of
supply and climate change.7 Sustainability is one of the key concepts of
the new paradigm. Cost-effective, sustainable energy policy should aim to
reduce energy use before seeking to meet the remaining demand by the
cleanest means possible.
The global trend at the moment is towards the energy strategies built
around the following hierarchy in energy options from the most
sustainable to the least sustainable:9
* Energy conservation: improved energy efficiency and rational use of
energy
* Increasing use of renewable sources
* Exploitation of un-sustainable resources using low-carbon technologies
The shift to renewable, energy-efficient and low-carbon technologies
driven by energy security and climate change concerns is making
progress although at a slower pace than desired. A transition from fossil
fuels to a non-carbon-based economy will more likely occur, over the
longer-term.
Conclusion:
As we know that the second law of thermodynamics states that when
energy changes from one form to another, some of the useful energy is
always degraded to lower-quality, more dispersed less useful energy. If the
electricity came from a nuclear plant then it could be argued that this is
cleaner than generating it from coal. However, the net energy efficiency in
either case is very low (@14%) when compared to other methods, such as
passive solar that has much higher net energy efficiency (@90%). His
claim is very flawed.
Reference:
1. Rajni Bakshi, "A new energy paradigm," The Hindu, Online edition of
Indias National Newspaper, Dec. 24, 2000.
2. Amulya Kumar N. Reddy, "Development, Energy and Environment
Alternative Paradigms", retreived from http://amulya-reddy.org.in
3. P. D. Rakin and R. M. Margolis, "Global Energy, Sustain ability, and
the Conventional Development Paradigm," Energy Sources, Part A:
Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, Vol. 20, No. 4,
(1998), pp. 363-383.
4. Hal Turton and Leonardo Barreto, "Long-term security of energy
supply and climate change," Vol. 34. No. 15 (October, 2006), pp.
2232-2250.
5. Eshita Gupta, "Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries,"
Energy Policy, Vol. 36, (January, 2008), pp. 1195-1211.
6. James P. Dorian, Herman T Franssen and Dale R. Simbeck, " Global
challenges in energy," Energy Policy, Vol. 34, No. 15 (October,
2006), pp. 1984-1991.
7. Valeria Costantini, Francesco Gracceva, Anil Markandya and Giorgia
Vicini, "Security of energy supply: Comparing scenarios from a
European perspective," Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 1 (January, 2007),
pp. 210-226.
8. William J. Nuttall and Devon L. Manz M. Totten, "A New Energy
Security Paradigm for the Twenty- First Century," EPRG Working
Paper,
retrieved
May
1,
2010,
from
http://wwweprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2008/ll/eprg0731.pdf
9. Insight Turkey, Volume 12, Number 3, pp. 107-128, July-September
(2010)
10.
11.
renewable
energy
market
May,
Industries,"
2010,
(August
2009)
from
http://www.pwc.com/tr_TR/tr/publications/Assets/Renewables_Report
_On_the_sunny_side_of_the_street.pdf.