Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
HRM503
Module Assessment
Reg. No.
Part-A
A.1
A.2
A.3
Part-B
B.1
B.2
Performance appraisal
Compensation planning
B.3
C1.1
C1.2
C2.1
C2.2
Part-C
C2.3
Second
Examiner
Marks
Part Total
First
Examiner
Marks
Marking Scheme
Max Marks
Sections
8+8
8
6
30
4
8
6
6
2
4
30
05
08
5+5
4+4
04
03
02
40
FT2014
HRM503
05
05
Q&A
05
Total
(20 marks reduced to 10 Marks)
20
Total 1.b
Marks
Attribute
Max Marks
10
Viva Voce
10
Total
20
Component - 2: Examination
Examination
Max Marks
Written examination
100
Component-1: Assignment
1.A
Result
1.B
1.C
Component-1 Total
Pass
Fail
Component-2: Examination
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
IMPORTANT: 1. Component 1 and 2 total marks have to be rounded off to the next higher integer and entered in the above fiel ds.
2. A minimum of 40% required for a pass in both components.
Please note:
1. Documental evidence for all the components/parts of the assessment such as the reports, presentation slides, posters, laboratory
exam / tool tests are required to be attached to the assignment report in a proper order.
2. The First Examiner is required to mark the comments in RED ink and the Second Examiners comments should be in GREEN ink.
3. The marks for all the questions of the assignment have to be written only in the Component -1: Assignment table.
4. The individual question marks have to be entered on the table of the Answer book for written exam and only the total marks are
entered in Component-2: Examination table.
5. The First Examiner (Module Leader) has to submit the following to Examination and Assessment Section after the review process:
Assignment documents, Grade-sheet data file and Module marks card (PMAR).
6. If the variation between the marks awarded by the first examiner and the second examiner lies within +/- 3 marks, then the marks
allotted by the first examiner is considered to be final. If the variation is more than +/- 3 marks then both the examiners should resolve
the issue in consultation with the Chairman BoE .
FT2014
HRM503
Assignment
Instructions to students:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
FT2014
HRM503
(2+2 Marks)
FT2014
HRM503
b. Identify and analyse the factors responsible for the restructuring of human resources in Coca
Cola and Dabur
(4+4 Marks)
2. Compare and discuss the performance appraisal and compensation planning employed by Coca
Cola and Dabur
(6+6 Marks)
3. Identify an organisation* like Dabur, which used proactive approach to HRD. Discuss and comment
on the initiatives taken and the outcome.
(6 Marks)
Please Note
Abstract of the case study has been provided above for your reference
Please refer the following URL for the complete case study
http://www.icmrindia.org/free%20resources/casestudies/Human%20Resource%20and%20Org
anization%20Behavior%20freecasep1.htm
*Please choose the organisation in consultation with Module Leader.
30 Marks
Part -C
1. Suppose you are appointed as an HR Manager of a Cement manufacturing company. You are
assigned the task of developing a training plan for Finance for Non-Finance Executives.
Explain the steps involved in developing the training plan. Suggest a method for evaluating the
success of this training program.
2. Organisations* today are adopting new methods for performance management and
compensation management. Perform comparative analysis of 3 such methods addressing the
following.
New methods for performance management and compensation management from literature
Evaluation of each method
Suitability of each method to the Indian context
(*Please choose the organisation in consultation with Module Leader ).
35 Marks