Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
GR
RACE PERIOD
ON
NLINE
TARIFF PLAN
NS
PAYMENT
CELLULAR
R
COVERAGE SE
ERVICE CON
NNECTIVITY
PRO
OVIDER
RS
BILL PA
AYMENT ISD
EASY
RECHARGE
SUBMIT
TTED TO : Prof. TRIILOCHAN T
TRIPATHY
Y
SUBMIT
TTED BY :
: SUMEET SINGH
GMM SU
UNIL KUMA
AR
MVK CHA
AITANYA
MUKESH OL
H KANDHO
ON – ‘ I ’
SECTIO
12TH Jan
n ‘ 09
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We extend our sincere gratitude to Prof. Trilochan Tripathy without whose support and
inspiration this project would not have been possible. We would like to take this opportunity to
thank our faculty for the genuine pieces of advice which he has given from time to time for the
completion of this project.
.
We would also like to thank all our project mates and fellow students who extended their help
and support whenever required. A special thanks to all who provided their knowledgeable insight
into things of complexity and made them simple and lucid for us.
A sincere thanks to our Professor who guided us to collect the primary data and even to all those
people who have added value to our project work through the questionnaire they had filled on
due course of the project work.
Last but not the least, my warm heartfelt thanks to IBS, Hyderabad for providing us with the
facilities required to do the adequate research and give the project its final shape.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
PARTICULARS PAGE NO.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
RATIONALE OF CHOOSING THE TOPIC 6
OBJECTIVE OF PROJECT 7
HYPOTHESIS 7
APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM 7
LITERATURE SURVEY 8
DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY 9
OVERALL MARKET SHARE 10
RESEARCH DESIGN 13
TOOLS USED 13
CLUSTER ANALYSIS 14
FACTOR ANALYSIS 19
CORRELATION 29
REFERENCES 30
QUESTIONNAIRE 31
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Satisfaction is a person’s feelings of pleasure or disappointment resulting from comparing
a product’s perceived performance in relation to his/her expectations.
According to both marketing theory and practical experience, telecommunications firms should
improve their performance by satisfying their customers, so as to obtain and sustain advantage in
the intensely competitive environment. This is because customer satisfaction results in customer
loyalty and firms with a bigger share of loyal customers profit from increasing repurchase rate,
greater cross buying potential, higher price willingness, positive recommendation behavior
and lower switching tendency.
Here in this research we have tried to understand perceived value proposition and customer
satisfaction towards various cellular operators.
The study on customers was quantitative study of existing customers of all operators. Here in we
have tried to clarify certain factors related to customer’s satisfaction in current scenario.
Research Design Adopted: DESCRIPTIVE
Sample Space: 70
Primary Data Collection Source:
• IBS, Hyderabad
• TCS, Deccan Park
• STPI , Madhapur
• HSBC, Hyderabad
4
This is because it was intended to find the market characteristics such as market size, attitude of
the customers towards the different aspects of the service and so on; we adopted questionnaire
approach as a primary data collection technique. Both open ended and closed ended questions
were used in the questionnaire to get better understanding of the problem.
To eliminate all kinds of bias in the research and to attain the true picture we adopted random
sampling in our research work.
Here in order to measure the perceived preference level of the customer and there deviation we
have applied multivariate analysis tools such as factor analysis and cluster analysis.
The outcome of the research work has helped us to identify the parameters that the customers
keep in mind while selecting a cellular service provider.
There are 25 private companies operating in 23 telecom circles and four metro cities, covering
1500 towns across the country. There are two types of mobile service networks namely GSM
(Global System for Mobile) and CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access). The sector at present
is witnessing a fierce competition to acquire maximum number of new subscribers with various
price cuts and life time offers, as it is very difficult to make an existing subscriber switch
services.
With regular price cuts it becomes very difficult for existing players to offer premium quality
services to make their users happy, which then boils down to offering regular skeletal services
but with consistency and inbuilt quality which is the least the consumer expects.
Here in our study, we attempt to measure the satisfaction level of existing subscribers of three
service providers namely Idea, Tata Indicom, Reliance, Vodafone and Airtel in our campus, IBS
Hyderabad as well as in TCS Hyderabad (Deccan Office, Hi-Tec City)
5
RATIONALE OF CHOOSING THE TOPIC
The most uncertain things in the current competitive world is customer’s perception towards a
product or service. The most important objective from marketing point of view is to understand
the customer perception towards their product. Telecom Industry is booming, what we can say is
the period of telecom revolution. The number of cellular service providers is increasing and there
exists a wide variety of choice before the customers to choose a particular provider. So it
becomes a daunting task before the cellular players to provide best value proposition and
increased customer satisfaction towards their subscribers.
It is essential from business point of view to analyze the parameters which are essential for the
customers to choose a particular cellular operator. Moreover its important to understand the
factors which are responsible in getting increased revenues for the business and which has helped
in increasing the customer base of the cellular operator.
The Telecom Industry in India is still evolving and there are no signs of consolidation as of now.
Currently the industry is having a subscriber base of 230 million with an estimated 5-6 million
subscribers being added every month. Price war, subscriber base, decreasing ARPUs (Average
revenue per user), Technology issues, target market, value added services, network up gradation
are the issues of major concern to all the players. Government has already given green signals for
FDI participation to be raised to 74% and unified licensing regime is there. With government
decision to implement unified licensing Regime, CDMA players like Reliance, Tata have got
seamless mobility and would be at par with GSM players. GSM operators will be forced to
match the prices along with installing new capacities and upgrading the existing ones. This has
made the companies decrease the tariffs to the lowest in the world that is from the incoming and
outgoing call charges of Rs18/minute (0.45 USD) seven years ago to the present day when then
incoming calls are free and outgoing are charged as low as Rs 1/minute (0.02 USD). Under easy
payment plans you can get a lifetime incoming call for free!
There has been a tremendous growth in the telecom sector in India and doing a research project
to analyze the customer preference towards the cellular service providers is definitely a
knowledge gaining and it would help in understanding the sector much better.
6
OBJECTIVE OF PROJECT
Here with the help of this research we are trying to determine the overall perceived value
proposition of the service and satisfaction levels of the customers of different mobile operators.
HYPOTHESIS
Null Hypothesis: There exists no relationship between the variables we surveyed and the overall
customer satisfaction towards a cellular service provider.
Alternative Hypothesis: There exists a relationship between the variables we surveyed and the
overall customer satisfaction towards a cellular service provider.
APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM
The market research will be done in understanding perceived value proposition and customer
satisfaction of Indian mobile industry. The study on customers will be quantitative study of
existing customers of major operators, operating in Hyderabad. The research design adopted by
us will be descriptive design and we are following questionnaire approach as data collection
technique. Closed ended questions will be used in the questionnaire to get better understanding
of the problem.
7
LITERATURE SURVEY
According to both marketing theory and practical experience, telecommunications firms should
improve their performance by satisfying their customers, so as to obtain and sustainable
advantage in the intensely competitive environment to get heart and mind share. 4 A’s of
operationalising customer centric marketing (Rajendra S Sisodia and Jagdesh Seth) can
help to meet this end. This is because customer satisfaction results in customer loyalty and firms
with a bigger share of loyal customers profit from increasing repurchase rate, greater cross
buying potential, higher price willingness, and lower switching tendency.
As stated in the case study by Fulbagh Singh and Reema Sharma in their research paper
“Cellular services And Customer Buying Behavior in Amritsar City”, “There is a need to change
the image the product for status symbol to product of necessity to increase the clientele base. For
this the cellular company must further reduce the per minute charges and introduce more flexible
plan schemes.”
8
DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY
Primary and Secondary Data Sources
Secondary Data Sources of Customer Satisfaction Report of CRISIL and other journal
and research papers were used to discern customer satisfaction factors of service
providers in the Hyderabad telecom circle.
Sampling techniques
The sampling technique used in the study is Convenience sampling. More specifically
Judgmental sampling technique which lets the researcher judge whether the respondent will truly
give his response without any bias. Convenience Sampling has been administered on 100
respondents. Data was analyzed on the survey conducted on the ICFAI Hyderabad Campus.
Scaling Techniques
Likert scale – to measure customer satisfaction. The scale is balance .and has responses
ranging from “Not at all essential- 1”, and if they feel the factor is “Absolutely essential
mark 7”
Multivariate Analysis tool using SPSS to measure perceived value proposition using tools
like
Factor Analysis
Cluster Analysis
9
OVERA
ALL MA
ARKET SHARE
Perce
ent Sharre Of Serrvice Pro
oviders ((Nationaal)
Otheers
3%%
Aircel
6.17% Bharti Airtel
25%
33.2
Reeliance Idea
3
3.84% 13.16%
BSSNL
Vodafo
one 16.24%
23.57%
%
MTNNL
1.53
3%
Source: CRIS
SIL Report (below)
(
Grou
up Compa
any wise %
% markett share N
Nov'2008
8
Sl. No. Na
ame of Comp
pany Total Sub
b Figures % Ma
arket Share
1 Bharti Airttel 82920593 3
33.25%
2 Vodafone Es
V ssar 58764164 2
23.57%
3 BSNL 40487511 1
16.24%
4 IDEA 32809720 1
13.16%
5 Aircel 15375258 6
6.17%
6 Re
eliance Tele
ecom 9582
2695 3.84%
7 Spice 3705
5894 1.49%
8 MTNL 3821
1277 1.53%
9 BPL 1882
2324 0
0.75%
All India 24934
49436 10
00.00%
10
ANDHR
RA PRADESH SUBCR
RIBER BA
ASE DATA
Players Sub
bscriber Ba
ase
Vod
dafone Essa
ar 3430016
Bh
harti Airtel 8094328
IDE
EA cellularr 4460438
BSNL 1696126
VO
ODAFONE 1123459
RELIANCE
R 2741333
SUBSCR
RIBER BA
ASE AT A.P
900000
00
800000
00
700000
00
600000
00
500000
00
400000
00
Subscriber Baase
300000
00
200000
00
100000
00
0
Vodafone Bharti Airteel IDEA cellular BSNL V
VODAFONE REELIANCE
Essar
11
PREP
PAID MA
ARKET SSHARE
Airttel
8%
8% Vod
dafone
35% Ideaa
10
0%
Tataa
1
14% Reliiance
BSN
NL
25%
%
POSTTPAID M
MARKET SHARE
19% Airtel
29% Vod
dafone
5% Ideaa
Tataa
Reliance
3%
24%
% BSN
NL
14%
otheers
7%
Source: Crisil
C Researcch Telecom Services, Monthly
M Review Februaryy 2008
12
RESEARCH DESIGN
Descriptive Design
The research design chosen for the study was descriptive. This was because it was intended
to find the market characteristics such as market size, attitude of the customers towards the
different aspects of the service and so on.
.
Information Needed For the Research
Since the primary research was already conducted on customers, the information needs were
known well. The study required the following information to be extracted for doing the final
analysis.
¾ What are the present satisfaction levels of the customers with respect to different
aspects of service provided?
¾ What are the preferences of the customer with regard to the service provided?
¾ Which aspects of the service have more predominant effect on the overall
Satisfaction levels of the customers?
TOOLS USED
• SPSS 13.0 for Windows
• Microsoft Excel
• Microsoft Word
The above mentioned tools were used in the completion of the project. Using SPSS 13.0 we
analysed the data through factor analysis and cluster analysis. Again using MS Excel we did the
required graphs to analyse the trend in the growth of prepaid or postpaid subscribers in the state
of Andhra Pradesh.
13
CLUSTER ANALYSIS
(Introduction of Cluster Analysis and Its Application In This Survey)
Cluster analysis is an exploratory data analysis tool for solving classification problems. Its
object is to sort cases (people, things, events, etc) into groups, or clusters, so that the degree of
association is strong between members of the same cluster and weak between members of
different clusters. Each cluster thus describes, in terms of the data collected, the class to which
its members belong; and this description may be abstracted through use from the particular to the
general class or type.
Kmeans clustering
The K-means algorithm assigns each point to the cluster whose center (also called centroid) is
nearest. The center is the average of all the points in the cluster — that is, its coordinates are the
arithmetic mean for each dimension separately over all the points in the cluster...
Example: The data set has three dimensions and the cluster has two points: X = (x1, x2, x3) and
Y = (y1, y2, y3). Then the centroid Z becomes Z = (z1, z2, z3), where z1 = (x1 + y1)/2 and z2 =
(x2 + y2)/2 and z3 = (x3 + y3)/2.
14
ANALYSIS OF CLUSTERS IN THIS SURVEY
Cluster Analysis was applied to this survey in order to segment our respondent’s base by service
usage patterns. If customers can be classified by usage, the company can offer more attractive
packages to its customers.
Iteration History (a)
(a) Iterations stopped because the maximum number of iterations was performed. Iterations
failed to converge. The maximum absolute coordinate change for any center is .000. The current
iteration is 4. The minimum distance between initial centers is 20.664.
The iteration history shows the progress of the clustering process at each step. In early iterations,
the cluster centers shift quite a lot. By the 4th iteration, they have settled down to the general
area of their final location, and the last two iterations are minor adjustments.
15
ANOVA TABLE
The ANOVA table indicates which variables contribute the most to your cluster solution.
Variables with large F values provide the greatest separation between clusters.
ANOVA
Cluster Error
Mean Square df Mean Square df F Sig.
Tariff Plan 29.126 1 2.315 68 32.579 .001
Customer care 39.226 1 2.149 68 18.251 .000
GPRS/Internet 52.557 1 2.481 68 21.183 .000
Connectivity/congestio
5.085 1 2.804 68 1.813 .183
n
Dealer Support 50.631 1 2.087 68 24.256 .000
Easy –Recharge/Bill
Payment 16.481 1 2.982 68 5.526 .022
16
In our case, we see that Tariff Plan contributes the maximum to the cluster solution i.e. the
respondents have given utmost importance to the Tariff plan. Other important factors
contributing which are considerably contributing to the cluster are Customer Care, GPRS,
Bundled packages, Dealer Support, Conferencing.
The F test is used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are
not corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster
means are equal.
FINAL CLUSTER CENTERS
The values in the table are the means for each variable within each final cluster
17
It can be observed from the above table that the Tariff Plan has been given more importance by
the cluster 1 respondents rather than cluster 2.Similarly Customer care, Coverage, easy
Recharge, ISD, Conferencing have also been given more importance by Cluster 1 respondents
rather than Cluster 2 respondents.
Whereas variables like Grace Period, MMS, Closed User Group (CUG) is being equal
importance by customers belonging to both the clusters.
All in all the respondents of Cluster 1 can be viewed as more Tech Savvy and Sensitive towards
different services provided by mobile service providers. And the respondents of cluster 2 are not
as proactive towards using new technology and advanced communication services.
NUMBER OF CASES IN EACH CLUSTER
Number of Cases in each Cluster
Cluster 1 31.000
2 39.000
Valid 70.000
Missing .000
This table shows how many cases were assigned to each cluster. In this survey 31 respondents
belonged to Cluster 1 and 39 have been found to be in Cluster 2.
Limitations
The findings are based on a survey conducted in Hyderabad so the results obtained might be
different from the behavior displayed from a more general sample.
This result cannot be generalized to all geographical regions in which the telecom service
providers operate.
18
FACTOR ANALYSIS
The survey we conducted was on the customer satisfaction and preference level for various
mobile service providers.
1. Tariff Plan
2. Customer Care
3. GPRS/Internet
4. Connectivity/Congestion
5. Dealer Support
7. Grievance Handling
8. Roaming Facility
9. ISD
11. MMS
19. Coverage
19
We have performed factor analysis on these variables. The various outputs through SPSS is
mentioned below,
KMO AND BARTLETT'S TEST
Table 1.3
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling
.708
Adequacy.
KMO test and Bartlett’s Test is basically the test of assumptions. The standard value for KMO
test is that it should be greater than 0.70 and is inadequate if less than .50. The underlying
assumptions behind the KMO test is that it indicates there is sufficient item for each factor. Here
in our test the value of KMO is .708 which shows that we have sufficient item for each factor.
The assumption of Bartlett’s test of sphericity is that it should be significant(less than .005)
indicating that correlation matrix is significantly different from identity matrix in which
correlations between the variables is zero. Here in our test significant value we have got is .000:
this means that the variables are correlated highly enough to provide a reasonable basis for factor
analysis. As per our analysis the approx chi square value is 397.049 and degree of freedom is 190.
This shows that data are fit for factor analysis.
20
Table 1.4
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Tariff Plan 1.000 .688
Customer care 1.000 .697
GPRS/Internet 1.000 .646
Connectivity/congestion 1.000 .552
Dealer Support 1.000 .488
Easy –Recharge/Bill
1.000 .703
Payment
Grievance Handling 1.000 .749
Roaming Facility 1.000 .666
ISD 1.000 .796
Grace Period 1.000 .752
MMS 1.000 .663
Sing tones & Ringtones 1.000 .540
Conferencing Facility 1.000 .672
Missed Call Intimation 1.000 .720
Closed User Group 1.000 .744
Bundled Packages 1.000 .663
Other Promotional
1.000 .673
Schemes
Privacy Agreement 1.000 .575
Coverage 1.000 .677
Online Payment 1.000 .708
Communality, h2, is the squared multiple correlation for the variable as dependent using the
factors as predictors. The communality measures the percent of variance in a given variable
explained by all the factors jointly and may be interpreted as the reliability of the indicator.
21
Communality for a variable is computed as the sum of squared factor loadings for that variable
(row). Recall r-squared is the percent of variance explained, and since factors are uncorrelated,
the squared loadings may be added to get the total percent explained, which is what communality
is. For full orthogonal PCA(the one used in our analysis), the initial communality will be 1.0 for
all variables and all of the variance in the variables will be explained by all of the factors, which
will be as many as there are variables. The "extracted" communality is the percent of variance in
a given variable explained by the factors which are extracted, which will usually be fewer than
all the possible factors, resulting in coefficients less than 1.0.
When an indicator variable has a low communality (>=.25), the factor model is not working well
for that indicator and possibly it should be removed from the model. Low communalities across
the set of variables indicate the variables are little related to each other. However, if the
communality exceeds 1.0, there is a spurious solution, which may reflect too small a sample or
the researcher has too many or too few factors.
22
Table 1.5
Total
Variance
Explained
Initial
Component Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Eigenvalues
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1.00 4.86 24.29 24.29 4.86 24.29 24.29 2.93 14.64 14.64
2.00 1.84 9.18 33.47 1.84 9.18 33.47 2.20 11.00 25.64
3.00 1.61 8.03 41.51 1.61 8.03 41.51 1.89 9.44 35.07
4.00 1.53 7.66 49.17 1.53 7.66 49.17 1.74 8.70 43.77
5.00 1.36 6.79 55.96 1.36 6.79 55.96 1.69 8.43 52.20
6.00 1.15 5.75 61.71 1.15 5.75 61.71 1.54 7.70 59.90
7.00 1.03 5.15 66.86 1.03 5.15 66.86 1.39 6.96 66.86
8.00 0.91 4.54 71.40
9.00 0.81 4.07 75.47
10.00 0.77 3.87 79.35
11.00 0.65 3.27 82.61
12.00 0.62 3.12 85.73
13.00 0.50 2.50 88.23
14.00 0.46 2.30 90.53
15.00 0.43 2.14 92.67
16.00 0.36 1.79 94.46
17.00 0.34 1.68 96.13
18.00 0.31 1.56 97.70
19.00 0.27 1.34 99.04
20.00 0.19 0.96 100.00
d: Principal Component Analysis.
Basically the total variance explained table tells about the variance explained by each factor.
Eigen values refer to the variance explained or accounted for. The % of variance shows the
percent of variance for each component before and after rotation. Cumulative variance basically
shows the percentage of variance shown by the variables whose Eigen value is greater than 1.
Here the Total Variance Explained table shows how the variance is divided among the 20
possible factors. We found seven factors have Eigen values (a measure of explained variance)
greater than 1.0 which is a common criterion for a factor to be useful. When the Eigen value is
less than 1.0, this means that the factor explains less information than a single item would have
explained. Here the first factor shows the highest variance i.e. it explained 24.291 % of the total
variance explained. If we sum up all the seven factors it basically explained 66.863 % of the total
variance. The computer would have looked for the best seven-factor solution by "rotating" seven
23
factors. The remaining 13 factors are not showing any variance due to their weakly correlated
nature.
For this we will use an orthogonal rotation (varimax). This means that the final factors will be as
uncorrelated as possible with each other. As a result, we can assume that the Information
explained by one factor is independent of the information in the other factors. We rotate the
factors so that they are easier to interpret. Rotation makes it so that, as much as possible,
different items are explained or predicted by different underlying factors, and each factor
explains more than one item. This is a condition called simple structure. One thing to look for in
the Rotated Matrix of factor loadings is the extent to which simple structure is achieved.
24
Scree Plot
4
Eigenvalue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Component Number
The Rotated Factor Matrix table, which contains these loadings, is key for understanding the
results of the analysis. Here the computer have sorted the 20 factors into seven overlapping
group of items each which has a loading of 0.40 or higher (without considering the sign).
25
Table 1.6
Rotated Component Matrix (a)
Components
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Grace Period .792
Customer care .747
GPRS/Internet .741
Tariff Plan .619 .401
Bundled Packages .729
Online Payment .718
Privacy Agreement .639
Dealer Support .450 .456
Conferencing Facility .442 .439
Grievance Handling .777
Sing tones & Ringtones .601
Roaming Facility .566 .478
Easy –Recharge/Bill
.741
Payment
Coverage .639 .443
ISD .848
Other Promotional
.761
Schemes
MMS .806
Connectivity/congestion .505
Missed Call Intimation .741
Closed User Group .451 -.518
26
Table 1.7
Critical Factors
Customer
Economic Customer Easy to Add on
Support Accessibility Travel pack
Pack/Pricing Friendliness Connect feature
Back
Easy –
Privacy Grievance Missed Call
Tariff Plan Recharge/Bill ISD MMS
Agreement Handling Information
Payment
Bundled Roaming
GPRS/Internet
Packages Facility
Customer Care
27
Internet in collaboration with various Banks) and Bundled Packages (various packages like
Closed User Group etc.)
Factor 4: Accessibility
Two types of features are loaded on this factor and together they account for 8.70% of the
variance. Easy Re-charge/Bill Payment and Coverage has become one of the most crucial factors
to measure the accessibility of the customers. If a company is not able to handle the coverage of
customers then it is bound to lose the market share and its reputation in the market.
28
Factor 7: Add-on Feature
One type of feature is loaded on this factor. Missed Call Information, which accounts for 6.96%
of the variance. This is a new trend in the mobile service market. Service providers are making
huge revenue by providing this additional service, which is very popular in young generation as
well as business and professional class.
CORRELATION
CORRELATIONS
Easy Missed Other
Sing tones Closed Online
Overall Tariff Customer Dealer –Recharg Grievance Roaming Grace Call Bundled Promotion Privacy
GPRS/Int Connectivity/ ISD MMS & Conferenci User Coverage Paymen
Satisfaction Plan care Support e/Bill Handling Facility Period Intimati Packages al Agreement
ernet congestion Ringtones ng Facility Group t
Payment on Schemes
Overall Satisfaction 1.00 0.18 0.36 0.31 0.20 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.27 0.02 0.11 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.42 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.34 0.10 0.07
0.13 0.00 0.01 0.10 0.40 0.38 0.10 0.02 0.87 0.38 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.42 0.58
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Tariff Plan 0.18 1.00 0.43 0.31 0.10 0.42 0.29 0.19 0.36 0.10 0.30 (0.13) 0.33 0.27 0.20 (0.04) 0.12 0.25 0.16 0.09 0.06
0.13 0.00 0.01 0.40 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.27 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.72 0.30 0.04 0.18 0.44 0.65
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Customer care 0.36 0.43 1.00 0.53 0.19 0.46 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.53 (0.00) 0.16 0.45 0.19 0.18 0.26 0.13 0.43 0.16 0.24
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.69 0.00 1.00 0.19 0.00 0.11 0.13 0.03 0.28 0.00 0.20 0.04
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
GPRS/Internet 0.31 0.31 0.53 1.00 0.24 0.29 0.36 0.12 0.28 0.01 0.49 0.10 0.21 0.30 0.06 0.27 0.19 0.12 0.26 0.13 0.18
0.01 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.32 0.02 0.95 0.00 0.42 0.08 0.01 0.63 0.02 0.12 0.33 0.03 0.29 0.14
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Connectivity/congesti 0.20 0.10 0.19 0.24 1.00 (0.02) (0.01) 0.08 (0.04) 0.05 0.12 0.13 0.03 (0.03) 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.07
on
0.10 0.40 0.11 0.05 0.90 0.95 0.49 0.76 0.65 0.34 0.27 0.83 0.82 0.51 0.47 0.34 0.24 0.28 0.16 0.57
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Dealer Support 0.10 0.42 0.46 0.29 (0.02) 1.00 0.26 0.24 0.19 (0.00) 0.29 0.05 0.19 0.36 0.11 0.19 0.37 0.11 0.30 0.25 0.23
0.40 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.90 0.03 0.05 0.12 1.00 0.01 0.71 0.12 0.00 0.36 0.11 0.00 0.36 0.01 0.04 0.05
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
sy –Recharge/Bill Paym 0.11 0.29 0.28 0.36 (0.01) 0.26 1.00 (0.12) 0.29 0.02 0.16 (0.11) 0.19 0.20 0.09 0.14 0.05 0.06 0.11 0.25 0.18
0.38 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.95 0.03 0.31 0.02 0.86 0.20 0.35 0.12 0.10 0.45 0.24 0.66 0.63 0.35 0.04 0.13
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Grievance Handling 0.20 0.19 0.23 0.12 0.08 0.24 (0.12) 1.00 0.30 0.08 0.09 0.02 0.35 0.32 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.22 0.04 (0.03) 0.11
0.10 0.12 0.06 0.32 0.49 0.05 0.31 0.01 0.53 0.48 0.89 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.72 0.83 0.34
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Roaming Facility 0.27 0.36 0.23 0.28 (0.04) 0.19 0.29 0.30 1.00 0.12 0.14 0.04 0.29 0.30 0.22 0.29 (0.02) 0.25 0.06 0.31 0.11
0.02 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.76 0.12 0.02 0.01 0.32 0.25 0.72 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.86 0.03 0.60 0.01 0.38
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
ISD 0.02 0.10 0.05 0.01 0.05 (0.00) 0.02 0.08 0.12 1.00 0.34 0.12 0.24 0.17 (0.09) 0.29 0.18 0.44 0.12 0.19 0.05
0.87 0.40 0.69 0.95 0.65 1.00 0.86 0.53 0.32 0.00 0.34 0.04 0.16 0.48 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.32 0.12 0.71
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Grace Period 0.11 0.30 0.53 0.49 0.12 0.29 0.16 0.09 0.14 0.34 1.00 0.08 0.05 0.27 0.03 0.36 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.05 0.00
0.38 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.01 0.20 0.48 0.25 0.00 0.51 0.68 0.02
0.78 0.00 0.13 0.17 0.28 0.67 1.00
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
MMS 0.20 (0.13) (0.00) 0.10 0.13 0.05 (0.11) 0.02 0.04 0.12 0.08 1.00 0.09 (0.00) 0.13 0.30 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.24 0.09
0.10 0.27 1.00 0.42 0.27 0.71 0.35 0.89 0.72 0.34 0.51 0.45 0.97 0.27 0.01 0.07 0.35 0.88 0.04 0.48
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Sing tones & Ringtones 0.21 0.33 0.16 0.21 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.35 0.29 0.24 0.05 0.09 1.00 0.29 0.18 0.15 0.23 0.30 (0.04) 0.18 0.23
0.08 0.01 0.19 0.08 0.83 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.68 0.45 0.02 0.14 0.22 0.06 0.01 0.74 0.13 0.06
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Conferencing Facility 0.21 0.27 0.45 0.30 (0.03) 0.36 0.20 0.32 0.30 0.17 0.27 (0.00) 0.29 1.00 0.45 0.09 0.42 0.22 0.42 0.15 0.23
0.08 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.82 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.97 0.02 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.20 0.06
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Missed Call Intimation 0.42 0.20 0.19 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.28 0.22 (0.09) 0.03 0.13 0.18 0.45 1.00 (0.04) 0.24 0.11 0.19 0.18 0.16
0.00 0.10 0.11 0.63 0.51 0.36 0.45 0.02 0.07 0.48 0.78 0.27 0.14 0.00 0.71 0.05 0.37 0.11 0.13 0.17
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Closed User Group 0.20 (0.04) 0.18 0.27 0.09 0.19 0.14 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.36 0.30 0.15 0.09 (0.04) 1.00 0.25 0.16 0.16 0.25 0.25
0.11 0.72 0.13 0.02 0.47 0.11 0.24 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.22 0.46 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.04
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Bundled Packages 0.21 0.12 0.26 0.19 0.12 0.37 0.05 0.25 (0.02) 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.23 0.42 0.24 0.25 1.00 0.22 0.36 0.12 0.38
0.08 0.30 0.03 0.12 0.34 0.00 0.66 0.04 0.86 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.31 0.00
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
her Promotional Schem 0.24 0.25 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.06 0.22 0.25 0.44 0.16 0.11 0.30 0.22 0.11 0.16 0.22 1.00 0.14 0.21 0.05
0.05 0.04 0.28 0.33 0.24 0.36 0.63 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.35 0.01 0.06 0.37 0.18 0.07 0.25 0.07 0.68
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Privacy Agreement 0.34 0.16 0.43 0.26 0.13 0.30 0.11 0.04 0.06 0.12 0.13 0.02 (0.04) 0.42 0.19 0.16 0.36 0.14 1.00 0.13 0.28
0.00 0.18 0.00 0.03 0.28 0.01 0.35 0.72 0.60 0.32 0.28 0.88 0.74 0.00 0.11 0.18 0.00 0.25 0.29 0.02
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Coverage 0.10 0.09 0.16 0.13 0.17 0.25 0.25 (0.03) 0.31 0.19 0.05 0.24 0.18 0.15 0.18 0.25 0.12 0.21 0.13 1.00 0.30
0.42 0.44 0.20 0.29 0.16 0.04 0.04 0.83 0.01 0.12 0.67 0.04 0.13 0.20 0.13 0.04 0.31 0.07 0.29 0.01
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
Online Payment 0.07 0.06 0.24 0.18 0.07 0.23 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.00 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.16 0.25 0.38 0.05 0.28 0.30 1.00
0.58 0.65 0.04 0.14 0.57 0.05 0.13 0.34 0.38 0.71 1.00 0.48 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.04 0.00 0.68 0.02 0.01
70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00
29
The above chart clearly shows that all the 20 different factors that we have taken is
positively correlated with the overall satisfaction level of the customers.
So we can say that the Null Hypothesis which we have taken should be rejected rather the
Alternative Hypothesis should be accepted.
From the table we have found out that customer satisfaction towards cellular service
providers depends mostly on the customer care provided by the operators. This is because
both customer satisfaction levels and customer care are found to be highly correlated.
REFERENCES
www.google.com
www.crisil.com
www.auspi.in
www.coai.org
Rajendra S Sisodia and Jagdesh Seth (2004)“4 A’s of operationalising customer centric
marketing.
Fulbagh Singh and Reema Sharma( Sep 2008) Cellular services And Customer Buying
Behavior in Amritsar City.
30
QUESTIONNAIRE
RATINGS: If you feel the factor is “Not at all essential mark 1”, and if you feel the factor is
“Absolutely essential mark 7”. If your feelings are less strong mark one of the numbers in the middle.
There is no right or wrong answer-all we are interested in is the number that truly reflects your feelings
regarding the weight-age given to the factor.
RATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Satisfaction Level
31
Q5.) Rate your operator on following features.
RATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Tariff Plan
Customer care
GPRS/Internet
Connectivity/congestion
Dealer Support
Easy –Recharge/Bill Payment
Grievance Handling
Roaming Facility
ISD
Grace Period
MMS
Sing tones & Ringtones
Conferencing Facility
Missed Call Intimation (when mobile is switched
off)
Online Payment
*Connection with a handset/1000 calls free etc.
32
+No promotional SMS/Calls coming from your service provider
Yes No
Q8) Does your service connection has any tie ups with banks for easy monthly payments?
Yes No
GSM CDMA
Q10) Are you willing to continue with the existing cellular service provider?
Q11) When 3G services are launched would you switch over to a different cellular service
provider?
Q12) Would you recommend any of your colleagues or friends to use the current cellular service
provider that you are using?
Q13) Will you change your cellular service provider in-case of suggestions from your colleagues
or friends?
Q14) How many other members in your family use the connection provided by the cellular
provider as you are using?
33