Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
27 person cards with red backs (each representing a person, marked with the initial letter of their name)
36 investigation cards with black backs (each representing three persons, marked with the initial letters
of their names)
40 markers
1 investigation pad (each sheet has 27 lines, each corresponding to a person card, and columns for the
participating players)
Everyone must hide their investigation sheet during the game. Each player can of course mark his sheet as he wishes
to best assist him in recording the results of investigations and to make deductions.
4. Special investigations
Once each player has been questioned at least once and at least six investigation cards have been played, special
investigations may be performed.Whoever is asking a question may also take an investigation card in front of another
player but with no markers on it, and place both it and an investigation card drawn normally in front of the player
he's chosen. That player must respond to each of these cards as instructed in #3 above.
(Translator's note: when trying to sort out the rules for the game, I interpreted this rule differentlyoffering players
a choice of a normal or special investigation. Looking through the rules again, I think the above is the actual rule; I
have no idea whether the misinterpretation makes for a better game or not. But anyone who directly or indirectly
learned the game from Aaron Fuegi or I is likely to have played by my misinterpretation.)
5. Deduction
Each player marks the results of the investigations into his investigation sheet under the name of the interviewee
and constantly supplements it through clever deduction. Plus-signs are recommended (+) as well as minus-signs (-)
when certain a player has or doesnt have a certain card. The goal of the deductions is to find what person cards
other players have. Because whoever first knows which person cards the other players have, knows for a fact the
three members of the criminal ring Black Vienna.
(Translators note: of course, its not necessary to know which cards any other player has to be certain of the makeup
of the criminal ring...)
6. Accusations
Whoever believes they know the three members of the criminal ring knocks on the table and says Black Vienna.
Each player can do this at any time, whether or not they were involved in the latest investigation. At this point the
game is interrupted. The player who has knocked makes an accusation. He marks the initial letters of the three
persons who in his opinion belong to the criminal ring with three clear circles on his investigation sheet. Then, he
covers his investigation sheet, looks at the three criminal ring cards, and checks whether his accusation is correct
or not. If the accusation was not correct, then the game continues. The player who made the wrong accusation still
plays along, however he obviously may raise no second accusation. His scored for this game is zero.
7. Game end
If the accusation is correct, however, the game is over. The successful accuser has won the game and receives three
points for each marker left in the middle. Now the other players who have made no accusation may circle the initial
letters of the three people who they believe belong to the criminal ring on their investigation sheets. The three
criminal cards are then uncovered visibly for everyone, and each player who has the three criminal ring members
correct receives one point for each marker left in the middle. All other players receive zero points.
8. Unsuccessful investigation
If all players have accused incorrectly save one, the game is broken off. This one player may ask one final question,
and then must make an accusation. In this case, this player receives one point per remaining marker if successful,
zero otherwise. If three markers or fewer remain the game is also broken off. All players receive zero points.
Translation: Joe Huber
Cleaning up text: Aaron Fuegi