The Great Soviet Deception

Mesmerized by the Bear:

Editor: Donald S. McAlvany. This article is taken from the December 1989
Issue of The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to
know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to prepare for it." Patrick Henry, 1776
"The immediate issue for America surely is not Communism, but Soviet power.
The USSR wields the mightiest military establishment ever assembled, in
tandem with a vast edifice of disinformation, active measures, and agents of
influence, all of which allow the Soviets to manipulate world opinion at will.
Today, in the Soviet Union, Communist ideology has been dead for a long time.
But the huge Soviet military establishment remains intact and geared for
action." - Albert Jolis, Executive Director, The American Foundation for
Resistance International (11/89).
"When at your zenith of strength, feign weakness." - Sun Tsu.
"The US Communist Party is more influential than ever, because we have
created an atmosphere that the USSR is no longer a threat to America." - Gus
Hall, General Secretary of the Communist Party USA, in an interview with THE
NEW YORK TIMES (Hall claims 20,000 members and 500,000 sympathizers).

Introduction
Considering the "acceleration factor",* when one looks at current developments
in Europe, and between East and West, and America and Russia, one feels like
he is in a time warp. The Cold War and Communism have been declared
officially dead, Eastern Europe appears to be breaking up, as is the NATO
alliance, and Gorbachev and Bush are talking about our new partnership,
merging our common goals, and the New World Order. Has world peace and
brotherhood finally arrived? If not, what are we looking at that is emerging in
the 1990s? This issue of MIA** will attempt to analyze this landslide of events
and draw some conclusions.
*See "The Acceleration Factor" in this issue.
**MIA = McAlvany Intelligence Advisor

A. The Soviet Strategy for the Conquest of the West

It should never be forgotten that the Soviets are the chess champions of the
world who have taught geostrategic ally to plan 10 - 20 moves (or years)
ahead, to use strategic feints, deception and subterfuge. The people J. Edgar
Hoover called "masters of deceit" have learned the art of war and strategic
www.fatima.org

deception from such masters as Sun Tsu and von Clausewitz, as well as from
modern strategic geniuses such as Hitler, Chairman Mao, and Lenin.
1. The Soviet's Six Glasnosts - The present period of glasnost/perestroika
(the sixth since 1921) is designed to get America to disarm, to get the West to
build up and bail out the Soviet Union economically and industrially, and to
neutralize Western Europe and dissolve NATO. That this glasnost is a giant
deception is easier to understand if one looks at it in the perspective of the first
five Russian glasnosts.
Glasnost, a Russian concept which originally meant publicity or notoriety, has
become an effective instrument of Soviet policy since the early days of the
Bolshevik Revolution. As Edward Jay Epstein wrote in his excellent book
DECEPTION, "Glasnost was first used by Lenin, who realized that power
proceeded from denying others a veil of privacy for their decision-making.
Hence glasnost, or 'public airing' became a weapon for the Communist Party ...
The logic went: Democracies allow public criticism of officials; the Soviet Union
allows public criticism of officials; therefore, the Soviet Union is a democracy...
"Glasnost lent credibility to government-controlled newspapers that otherwise
would be considered mouthpieces for the Communist Party. It could be used to
establish a set of convenient peepholes for journalists, academics, and other
Kremlin watchers through which they could see selected pictures of Soviet
society ... Lenin, to get his revolution accepted by Western governments
and businesses, had to represent it as something it was not."
The First Glasnost: 1921-1929 - Under Lenin's New Economic Plan, he
persuaded Western governments, businessmen, and bankers that the revolution
was "restructuring", moving back to the free market, and politically liberalizing.
Massive Western financial and industrial aid poured in for nine years. Glasnost
No. 1 ended abruptly in 1929, and tens of millions of Russians went to the wall
shortly thereafter.
The Second Glasnost: 1936-1937 - Stalin suggested in the mid-'30s a
restructuring of the Soviet economy along capitalist lines (he called it
"perestroika). He proclaimed that the Soviet Union was returning to a Westernstyle constitutional government, to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly,
and a return to free elections with secret ballots. Stalin was portrayed in the
Soviet press and then the Western press as a pragmatist not an ideologue
(sound familiar?). Roosevelt and other Western leaders and businessmen, like
the dog responding to Pavlov's bell, began to pour in billions of aid, credits, and
trade. Glasnost No. 2 came to an end abruptly in 1938, and the brutal purges
known as the "Great Terror" followed immediately thereafter.
The Third Glasnost: 1941-1945 - When Hitler invaded Russia in June 1941,
the "partnership" with the United States was quickly revived by Stalin. Stalin
again claimed that the militant phase of Communism was at an end; he
www.fatima.org

dissolved the Comintern (a key organ for spreading international Communist

revolution). He promised that after the war, Russia would be buying a massive
amount of goods from the West. This all justified massive economic and military
aid through the Lend-Lease Program (i.e., almost $10 billion).
Harry Hopkins, President Roosevelt's advisor, wrote after meeting with Stalin at
Yalta in 1945, "We really believed that this was the dawn of the new day we
had been praying for ... the Russians had proved that they could be reasonable
and far-seeing, and there wasn't any doubt in the mind of the President, or any
of us, that we could live and get along with them peacefully for as far into the
future as any of us could imagine."
Glasnost No. 3 ended abruptly in 1945, when the Soviets annexed the three
Baltic states Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, as well as parts of Poland,
Romania, Prussia, Finland, Japan, and most of Eastern Europe. Over 100 million
people were enslaved and tens of millions subsequently died.
The Fourth Glasnost: 1956-1959 - In 1956, Khrushchev launched another
glasnost based on economic and political reforms, a return to competition and
the free market, de-Stalinization, and a restoration of democracy and individual
freedom in the Soviet Union. The end of Stalin's "cult of personality" was
equated by Khrushchev with democracy and so portrayed in the Western media.
The Soviet press began to publish stories about private millionaires,
underground businesses, and a thriving black market. Russian church leaders
were allowed to travel abroad; Solzhenitsyn was allowed to publish his works;
Soviet dissidents were allowed to have contact with the Western press.
Khrushchev complained about inefficiencies in the Soviet economy, and stated
almost word for word, Stalin's earlier message to the West: "If we cannot give
our people the same standard of living that you give your peoples under the
Capitalist system, we know that Communism cannot succeed." Sound familiar?
This is almost exactly what Gorbachev has been saying and doing.
Then, via his American intermediary Armand Hammer, Khrushchev began to
push for increased trade, credits, and aid. Some were forthcoming, but not as
much as in Glasnost No. 1 No. 3. Glasnost No. 4 began to end in 1959, with
the Soviet-backed Communist takeover in Cuba, the shooting down of an
American U-2, the mass arrest of Soviet dissidents, and the erection of the
Berlin Wall.
The Fifth Glasnost: 1970-1975 - The fifth glasnost was detente, initiated by
Leonid Brezhnev. It offered to restrict strategic arms, negotiate mutually
beneficial accords, and relax internal tensions. The Soviets began "public
airings" of issues to explain to relevant audiences in the West why they had
abandoned their prior goal of world revolution. The central theme of this
glasnost was that the Soviet government was no longer run by ideologues, but
by technocrats, who had no interest in adhering to the Leninist doctrine of class
www.fatima.org

warfare. Instead, like technocrats in the West, they wanted to expand their
industrial base. The chief goals of this glasnost were to obtain increased US aid
and trade (which they did under Nixon and Kissinger), and most importantly, to
inaugurate the arms control process.
During this glasnost, Brezhnev appeared willing to let Communist countries in
Eastern Europe follow their own independent relations with the West, he
announced unilateral troop cuts in Soviet forces in Eastern Europe. The AntiBallistic Missile Treaty of 1973 was one of Brezhnev's trophies from this
glasnost. Glasnost No. 5 began to lose credibility in 1975 when the Sovietbacked North Vietnamese over-ran South Vietnam in violation of Russian
promises to Kissinger. Over the next few years, widespread arrests of Soviet
dissidents, resumption of covert actions abroad, and, finally, the invasion of
Afghanistan in late '79 by Russia, totally discredited this glasnost.
The Sixth Glasnost: 1985-? - This began under Gorbachev and is a composite
of the first five glasnosts, although it is bigger and better and more
sophisticated than any of its five predecessors. And its stakes are much higher
Western Europe and perhaps the whole world.
(EDITOR'S NOTE: Glasnost No. 6 was supposed to start in 1983 under Yuri
Andropov, the brutal 15-year head of the KGB who was portrayed by Soviet
disinformation and the Western media as a "tall, handsome, muscular, Englishspeaking Russian, who wore American suits, drank American scotch, a lover of
classical music, etc." in short, someone just like us (sound familiar?).
Providentially, Andropov died of kidney disease in 1983, and Glasnost No. 6 had
to wait until Andropov's protg, Mikhail Gorbachev, could be brought to power
in 1985. It should be remembered, however, that the present Glasnost No. 6
scenario was scripted by Andropov and his KGB associates. That is why General
Vladimir Kryuchkov, the most vicious hardliner since Andropov, had been
elevated to head the KGB. Glasnost No. 6 is completely orchestrated by the
KGB.)
Each of these six glasnosts were strategic deceptions, carefully scripted by KGB
and other strategic planners to get the West to provide massive economic aid
and to disarm. History shows that after each of these glasnosts, the Soviets
reverted to form mass murders, purges, global revolution, intrigue, conquest
of countries, assassinations, etc. In fact, since 1961 (shortly after Glasnost No.
4 was terminated) 21 more countries have fallen to Soviet-backed coups,
revolutions, or wars of national liberation. The West has been deceived five
times, but Gorbachev's current deception is the biggest and most dangerous of
all.
2. Gorbachev's Current Strategy - Gorbachev and his brilliant KGB script
writers and military planners have decided to trade "nominal" control over the
Eastern bloc satellites for the neutralization of Western Europe and the
destruction of the NATO military alliance a quantum rearrangement of the
www.fatima.org

European chess board. Gorbachev and his Kremlin planners have not lost
control. (In fact, Gorbachev has more power than any Russian leader since
Lenin or Stalin.) The well-drafted script calls for the appearance that he has lost
control. In fact, the Soviet military and secret police are still intact in all of the
Eastern European satellite states (i.e., there are 380,000 Soviet troops in East
Germany alone), and the Soviet KGB and military, which are firmly in control of
the Soviet Union today, are both stronger than they have ever been in the
Soviets' 72 year history. However, the script calls for America and Western
Europe to be allowed to take over the financial burdens of Eastern Europe.
East Germany will become reunified; Western Europe is about to become
neutral; NATO will collapse; Eastern and Western Europe will become realigned
in an economic and, eventually, political bloc; America and the West will
massively disarm in light of the "diminished Soviet threat" and "end of the Cold
War"; America will become progressively more isolated economically and
politically from a united and neutral Europe; the Soviets will enter into an
economic and possibly one day, a military alliance with Japan; and all of the
above will be paid for by America and Western Europe in the biggest economic
bailout in world history.
After Glasnost No. 6, which is the greatest and most brilliant strategic deception
of all, has run its course, the Soviets will have the names of millions of
dissidents throughout the Empire, and these will be systematically liquidated in
bloody purges a la Stalin, Mao, and Tiananmen Square. Sometime, during or at
the end of Glasnost No. 6, America will be targeted for nuclear blackmail, or
outright military attack a la the Red Dawn scenario.

The Soviet leadership has promoted "new thinking" in world affairs, but military
power remains the predominant element which asserts Moscow's influence in world
affairs.
www.fatima.org

B. Are the Soviets Sincere - Or are They Masters at Deception?

"They disarm, we build." - Vladimir Lenin.
"The Soviets intend to conceal vast 'reserves' of missiles and warheads, hiding
them in places throughout the expansive Soviet Union where the 'imperialists'
could not spot them. Later, they could be launched ... in a nuclear war " - Nikita
Khrushchev in a speech to the Supreme Soviet (January 14, 1960).
"In military affairs, perestroika and modernization of Soviet technology under
the new economic thinking and more open East - West trade will help
increase the military might of our country... Soviet disarmament proposals
act as solvents to 'disarm' the military industrial complex of NATO." - General
Vladimir Kryuchkov, head of the KGB, speaking at the anniversary celebration of
Lenin's 1917 Revolution (November 1989).
"Perestroika is expressly designed to enhance Soviet military capability and
combat readiness." - An official in the Soviet Council of Ministers, 1987.
1. The Soviet Arms Buildup - "A prudent maxim for unsettled times: Keep
one's eye on who has what guns." - Angelo Codevilla.
"Widely advertised Soviet cutbacks are not what they are advertised to be, but
are actually a part of a major restructuring and modernization of Soviet forces.
US intelligence sources expect the Soviet military to emerge in the early 1990s
more powerful than it is today ... Strong and growing evidence indicates that
the Soviet offensive strategy hasn't changed. It is still aimed at world
domination, and there is nothing defensive about that." - Major General Henry
Mohr writing in THE NEW YORK TRIBUNE.
"We are not just a little bit behind the Russians, we are devastatingly behind
them ... I think the time has come when we have to quit fooling around and
trying to lie to the American people." - Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ), March
5, 1982, in a letter to President Reagan.
In spite of the euphoria over the "collapse of Communism", "Communism is
dead", "the Cold War is over", etc., and all of Gorbachev's "promises" to disarm,
Soviet military strength continues to ominously grow, and the Soviet military
lead over the US continues to widen substantially. According to the current US
Defense Report, Janes, and other international strategic think tanks, Moscow is
producing ever-growing numbers of ICBMs, submarines, tanks, aircraft carriers,
surface to air missiles, and other major military components.

www.fatima.org

Over the past 10 years, the value of the Soviet military procurement budget was
greater than that of the U.S., allowing the Soviets to deploy significantly more
weapons to its forces in the field. (Taken from the U.S. Government
Publication, Soviet Military Power 1988)
A) The Growing Soviet / US Military Gap - While the Soviets claim to be
disarming, under Gorbachev's glasnost/perestroika, they have undergone their
most massive arms buildup in the Soviets' 72 years of power. In 1985, the
Soviets had a 5 to 1 conventional lead in arms and manpower over the US and
at least a 5 to 1 strategic nuclear lead.
But while Reagan and Bush were lying to the American people and telling them
that the gap was closing, their own Defense Department compiled the following
numbers on the Soviets' new weapons production vs. America's from 1985
-1988:

www.fatima.org

Source: Department Of Defense

During the entire eight-year Reagan "military buildup", the Soviets in actuality,
out produced the US in key weapons by the following ratios: Intercontinental
Missiles 4 1/2 to 1; Air Defense Missiles 6 1/2 to 1; Bombers 4 to 1;
Tanks 3 1/2 to 1; Artillery 8 1/2 to 1. The Soviets are producing a nuclear
submarine every 7 weeks. Even though they received great acclaim for
mothballing four over-aged submarines in the Baltic, they still have 450
submarines to our 140. They are producing 16,000 SAM Missiles per year and
have massive superiority in tanks, anti-tank weapons, manpower, chemical
weapons, artillery, combat aircraft, helicopters, as well as in tactical nuclear and
ballistic systems. They are not disarming they are modernizing! In spite of
the Western perception that Russia is an economic/industrial basket case, her
weapons production lines are turning out high quality weapons as high a
quality as US weapons, but in vastly larger numbers.
In the 1970s, the Soviets acquired a fleet of missiles designed to destroy
American missiles on the ground, leading the respected defense analyst, Angelo
Codevilla, to conclude in 1979 that "Soviet armament gave it a good chance of
destroying most of America's missiles and bombers in a first strike, and of
defeating US forces in Europe, all without inflicting casualties on the order of
World War II."
Today, in the wake of America's pulling its missiles out of Western Europe, and a
decade of massive new Soviet missile and anti-missile production and
deployment, Codevilla believes America is far more vulnerable to a successful,
decisive nuclear first strike than a decade ago.
www.fatima.org

B) The Shifting Strategic Balance - Codevilla, writing in Gary North's

REMNANT REVIEW (12/l/89), says of the changing strategic balance:
"The United States' 'hard' strategic targets include 50 MX missile silos, 950
Minutemen silos, some 100 locations in two dozen ports where about twenty
ballistic missile submarines and perhaps fifty cruise missile-firing attack
submarines may be located on any given day, some 100 locations on about 25
airfields where the United States' 98 B-1 and 300 B-52 bombers are located,
and about 800 radar, communications, command, control, and intelligence
targets.
"To hit these 2,000 targets, the Soviets have at least: 3.080 counterforce
warheads aboard 308 SS-18 ICBMs, 552 warheads aboard 138 SS-17s, 1,950
aboard 350 SS-19s, 100 aboard a like number of truck mobile SS-25s, and
about 1,000 on perhaps 100 rail mobile SS-24s. That amounts to over 6,500
or a 3.5 to 1 ratio of warheads to targets up from about 2.5 to 1 a
decade ago. In addition to this, the Soviets have perhaps another 5,000 noncounterforce strategic warheads. On our side, the only warheads with a
counterforce potential equal to the Soviets' are the 500 atop our 50 MXs.
"The overall ratio of Soviet to US warheads is 8 to 1. In practice, this means
that a decapitating first strike is a serious option for whomever has
power in the Kremlin, but none at all for the US. It also means that after
such a strike, the US would be left with very little strategic power for retaliation
other than the perhaps 2,400 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM)
warheads at sea at any one time ... But these are small, inaccurate, and
incapable of penetrating Russia's formidable missile defenses."
Codevilla went on to describe that: "The importance of the proposed Strategic
Arms Reduction Treaty (START) is that, as it cuts down the number of missiles
on both sides, it would very likely squeeze America's allotted number of
warheads and allowable strategic weapons into perhaps 400 strategic
targets or less. Most likely these would be 50 fixed, or semi-fixed MXs,
perhaps 100 vulnerable bombers, and perhaps 15 submarines, only 8 of which
would be at sea at any given time. The Soviets would have 4,000 counterforce
warheads to hit them with. That would mean a 10 to 1 ratio, but against a
much smaller target base.
C) Soviet Missile and Civil Defense - Russia has protected its key cities,
government control centers, military, and industrial installations with massive
anti-missile and anti-aircraft defenses to protect against any American missile
(probably from US Submarines) or bomber retaliation. These air defenses
include 10,000 surface-to-air missiles. The Soviets spend $7 billion per year on
a massive civil defense system and have $200 billion worth of shelters and
protection equipment on the ground. (America has no missile defense system or
civil defense whatsoever.)
www.fatima.org

D) Balance of Power in Europe has Shifted - The balance of power in

Western Europe has shifted dramatically as the US pulled all of its nuclear
missiles capable of hitting Russia out of Europe and as the Soviets have
deployed even more missiles targeted on Europe. As Codevilla points
out: "It is a common misconception that the Soviet Union is 'de-valuing nuclear
weapons', especially in Europe. In fact, the Soviets continue to produce about
500 SS-21s every year. So, each year's production carries as many short range
(500 miles maximum) missile warheads as Gorbachev has promised to
withdraw from Europe. In addition, the Soviet Union's production of nuclearcapable artillery outnumbers ours by about 17 to 1. No, the Soviet Union is denuclearizing Western Europe, not Eastern Europe."
E) Upgrading and Modernizing the Soviet Military - Codevilla also
states: "The Soviet armed forces are in the process of one of their periodic
'revolutions'. There was one in the mid-1920s, another in the late 1940s, and a
big one between about 1957 and 1964. These revolutions consist of eliminating
old weapons and concepts while introducing better ones. They always involve
some shrinkage in quantity and a substantial increase in quality. The current
'revolution' seems cut out of the same cloth. As the Soviet military-industrial
complex looks to the future, they are eliminating less-trained personnel (some
of whom, from Central Asia, don't even speak Russian) and are trying hard to
raise the quality both of the equipment it produces and of the people who are to
operate it. In other words, Soviet conventional forces are not becoming weaker,
they are preparing to win the next war." So, Gorbachev is spending 20% of
his GNP on his military buildup and the modernization of Russia's
already vastly superior arsenal, widening his military lead over
America, and encouraging our disarmament.
2. Soviet MIG 29s to Cuba - While the Soviets talk peace they have begun
delivery of their most advanced fighter attack aircraft, the MIG 29 (two, at this
writing) to Cuba. A squadron of 14 of these sophisticated fighters, capable of
attacking important US military sea lanes in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean
Basin and the US Eastern Seaboard, as far north as South Carolina, and as far
west as New Orleans, will be delivered shortly. The MIG 29s are part of the
Soviets' annual $5 billion in aid (mostly military) to Cuba.

www.fatima.org

). Soviet Military Power 1988This very expensive, modern military (HIP type)
helicopter is part of Russia's massive and continuing military buildup of Nicaragua
which plans to have 600,000 men in its military forces by 1995. This is more than the
U.S.A. has presently worldwide. (Photo taken from US Government Publication
3. Massive Soviet Weapons Deliveries to Central America - Soviet-backed
Communist guerrillas (FMLN) attacked San Salvador, the capital of El Salvador,
on November 10 - 11, using Russian arms supplied through Cuba and
Nicaragua. The plan was to assassinate El Salvador's president and top
leadership (thereby decapitating and toppling the government). It was the
Communists' version of North Vietnam's Tet Offensive.
Cuban, Nicaraguan, East German, and Palestinian commanders participated in
the attack. On November 25, a plane from Nicaragua crashed in eastern El
Salvador carrying 24 Russian SAM-7 anti-aircraft missiles and a host of other
Soviet weapons. So far this year, the Soviets have delivered an estimated $350
million in weapons to the Communist Sandinistas (part of the $5 billion in
weapons delivered over the past 9 years), a total violation of Gorbachev's
promise to Bush to cut off Soviet arms deliveries to Nicaragua.
If El Salvador should fall to this Soviet-backed guerrilla onslaught (which has
claimed 70,000 lives since 1981), the combination of Soviet-backed Cuba,
Nicaragua and El Salvador would be too much for Costa Rica, Honduras,
Guatemala and Belize. All would fall in short order, and the Soviets would have
a clean sweep of Central America from Colombia to Mexico with those two
countries the next two dominoes to be taken out. All of this could happen over
the next 2 - 4 years, even as Americans are euphorically congratulating
themselves over the "death of Communism", the "end of the Cold War", etc.

www.fatima.org

On Sunday, June 25, 1989 in the tiny village of Ramo, Digos District, Philippines, 11
children (including 2 one year olds) 14 teenagers, 8 women (some of whom were
pregnant) and 7 men were massacred by a unit of over 70 highly armed members of
the Communists' New Peoples Army (NPA). These Communists spent 900 bullets in
murdering these 39 innocent peace loving members of this little community. The NPA
apparently wanted to intimidate others while teaching Ramo a lesson for refusing to
give 5 to 20 pesos (less than one dollar) a month to the Communists "Revolutionary
tax". Obviously Russia, which continues to finance the NPA has not been properly
consecrated and converted.
4. Soviets Orchestrating Guerrilla Wars All Over the World - Via the KGB
or GRU (Soviet military intelligence), the Soviets are orchestrating guerrilla wars
against South Africa, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, the Philippines, and in a dozen
other spots around the globe arming, training, and directing a score of
Communist national liberation groups. (Since 1961, Moscow has conquered
more than 20 countries with such wars of national liberation, its coups, and
subversion.) They have quietly airlifted $2.1 billion in arms to the Communist
government in Afghanistan in 1989 for use against the Mujahideen, several
hundred million in arms to the vicious Communist New Peoples Army in the
Philippines, and $5 billion in arms to Communist Angola for eventual use against
the Republic of South Africa. (Soviet arms delivered to Central America were
discussed in Section B-3 above.)
5. Soviet Espionage Against America is Exploding - Recently CIA Director
William Webster stated that the KGB threat against America despite
glasnost/perestroika has grown dramatically, and more successful intelligence
operations have taken place against the US over the past 4 years "than at any
time in our history ... Over the past decade, we have discovered more
penetrations of the US defense and intelligence communities than at any time in

www.fatima.org

our history." Senator David Boren (D-OR), head of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, says that "The spy war is heating up."
Under General Kryuchkov, the KGB, which is charged with stealing US
technology (especially military) is working overtime, while the Bush
Administration, basking in the euphoria of "our new partnership", is dropping
most of our internal security countermeasures. In fact, Soviet military and
intelligence personnel are given frequent access to US military bases and
defense plants by the Bush Administration. This started under Reagan.
Meanwhile, thousands of spies and spetsnaz have poured out of Eastern Europe
with the flood of refugees into the West over the past 60 days.
C. The American Stampede to Disarm
Gorbachev's and the KGB's number one goal of glasnost/perestroika and the
"apparent" liberalization in Eastern Europe is to lower the threat perception of
the US and Western allies so that there will be major reductions in defense
spending. In this, Gorbachev has already been incredibly successful. West
Germany has announced that it will cut its military forces by 20%. In America,
US NEWS & WORLD REPORT (12/11/89) articulated the disarmament explosion
which is sweeping the land with an article entitled "Does America Need an
Army?"
Secretary of Defense Cheney (a member of the globalist CFR and Trilateral
Commission) said in late November that he was "planning to cut Pentagon
spending next year because the likelihood of all-out conflict between the US and
Soviet Union ... is probably lower now than it's been since the end of World War
II."
(EDITOR'S NOTE: What evidence does Cheney have that the military threat has
been reduced? Indeed, his own Defense Department's numbers argue strongly
to the contrary.)
Cheney and the Bush Administration are planning a three year cut in the
defense budget of $180 billion (e.g., $60 billion, or 20%, per year) starting in
FY '91; the cutting of 229,000 troops over the next year to meet GrammRudman budget constraints; the closing of 15 Air Force bases; elimination of
200,000 US Army personnel (e.g., a 17% cut, or 3 divisions, out of a total of 18
active divisions); the phase-out of 2 US aircraft carriers (EDITOR'S NOTE: The
Russians now have 4 aircraft carriers under construction.), with associated air
wings, some battleships and other surface ships (100 naval ships in total to be
phased out); the elimination of the building of most Stealth Bombers; cancelling
of the program to modernize the main battle tank (the M-1 Abrams); cutting US
troops in Western Europe from 310,000 to 100,000 (a two-thirds cut); and
much more.
www.fatima.org

Retired General E.C. Meyer, former Army Chief of Staff, predicts that the US
Army will be cut in half over the next few years. THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
refers to Secretary Cheney as the Secretary of Disarmament. Liberal politicians
and academics are jumping on the bandwagon, calling for the total elimination
of the rail-based MX missile; the scale back of the Stealth Bomber from 132 to
13 planes; elimination of SDI; the closing of hundreds of US military bases
around the world; the total elimination of America's Advanced Tactical Fighters,
and a 50%, or more, cut in the size of the US military forces.
Liberal Congressman Jim Bates (D-CA) has introduced legislation to close the
Marines' Camp Pendleton and turn it into a national park. Pendleton is one of
America's two Marine bases that fronts on a body of water. Other Congressional
liberals hope to switch billions from defense to social programs, while many
moderates and conservatives see the defense crunch as a way of helping to
balance the budget and eliminate the deficit. It seems that Bush and Gorbachev
have opened up Pandora's disarmament box in America, and now, the
momentum for disarmament will become inexorable (i.e., like the growing leftist
orchestrated momentum for gun control).
(EDITOR'S NOTE: It should be remembered that as America embarks on
massive military cuts that the Soviets have 215 combat ready divisions vs. 18
for the US which are about to be cut to 15. Tiny Cuba has a larger standing
army than America before these proposed cuts. The 5 to 1 conventional and
strategic nuclear lead which the Soviets presently enjoy over America should
also be remembered, as should the present 4 to 1 Soviet naval lead over the
US.)
D. Bush Appeasement at the Malta Summit
The early December Malta Summit between Bush and Gorbachev has
established George Bush as the greatest appeaser since Neville Chamberlain
groveled before Adolf Hitler at the Munich Summit in 1938 appeasement
which helped set the stage for World War II. Columnist/author William Safire,
writing in THE NEW YORK TIMES called Bush's performance "Doormat
Diplomacy", saying that "The Bush strategy was to win world approbation by
giving Mr. Gorbachev everything before he had to ask."
Among these pre-emptive concessions were: 1) Bush's proposal to give Russia
observer status at the IMF and World Bank; 2) Bush promised to give the
Soviets Most Favored Nation trade status (opening up a Pandora's box of trade,
financial aid, and high tech transfers to the Soviets) at the summit next June;
3) Bush promised massive US taxpayer-backed loans to the Soviets via our
Export-Import Bank; 4) Bush offered to shift the disarmament focus from
strategic forces to conventional forces; 5) Bush offered to halt US production of
chemical weapons; 6) Bush agreed to negotiate and sign a START disarmament

www.fatima.org

treaty by next June that will cut America's and Russia's Strategic forces (e.g.,
bombers, missiles, missile launching submarines, etc.) by 50%.
(EDITOR'S NOTE: If America concludes the START Treaty and cuts our strategic
forces by 50%, and Russia cheats on the Treaty as they have on every treaty
we have ever signed with them it is tantamount to national suicide. We will
be nuked or blackmailed into surrender before the decade of the 1990s is over.)
Before the Summit, Bush proclaimed his own "new thinking" by
proclaiming "the end of an era of hard, joyless peace between two armed
camps"; by referring to Gorbachev "as that dynamic architect of reform"
(Russian citizens would disagree); and by making an extraordinary pledge:
"There is no greater advocate of perestroika than the President of the United
States."
At the Summit, according to press reports, "Bush and Gorbachev, with an
unprecedented display of camaraderie, buried the Cold War at sea, promising to
build new relations based on economic ties, disarmament accords, and support
for reforms in Eastern Europe." The world press euphorically referred to the two
"Super Partners" (see NEWSWEEK cover article 12/11/89; also note the picture
of Chamberlain and Hitler at a similar meeting at Munich 51 years ago).
While Bush was committing the political and economic power of the US to
helping the Communist Party in the USSR to maintain its power, Gorbachev
persuaded Bush to de-link the Soviet Union's support of regional aggression
from the disarmament issue and America's financial and technological aid to the
Soviets. In other words, Bush has agreed to proceed with disarmament and
massive US aid to the Russians, in spite of their revolutionary wars in Central
America, Africa, the Middle East, the Philippines, etc. Bush never mentioned the
withdrawal of 500,000 Soviet troops from Eastern Europe.
As William Safire stated: "In terms of Bush giving away everything and getting
nothing, and Gorbachev giving nothing and getting everything, Mr. Bush failed
miserably and Mr. Gorbachev succeeded brilliantly ... Despite this quid-pronothing, Secretary of State Baker gushed at the 'potential for real chemistry
between the two leaders' brought about by American concessioneering and
Soviet stonewalling. Safire went on to say: "Approaching the Summit with the
goal of developing a close personal friendship with Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Bush
was afflicted with an almost childlike desire to surprise the Great Surpriser." So,
once aboard the Maxim Gorky, Bush whirled about and presented the Soviet
leader with the detailed granting of Moscow's economic wish list ... The
surprised and delighted Soviet leader thanked Mr. Bush for his support of
perestroika and said: 'The Cold War is over.'"
(EDITOR'S NOTE: I'll bet Mr. Gorbachev was delighted! This was like Kissinger
going to the negotiating table with the North Vietnamese and giving them
www.fatima.org

everything they wanted including South Vietnam. Like Gorbachev, they too
were delighted!)
Another NEW YORK TIMES editorial entitled "Life Support For Moscow" by A.M.
Rosenthal commented regarding Bush's support for Gorbachev and his regime
against those freedom-loving Russians who have long been trying to overthrow
the yoke of Communism: "The United States has decided to try to halt, or at
least delay the great international revolution against Communism in Russia ...
Until Malta, there was a strong and growing possibility that the monopoly of the
Communist Party power in the Soviet Union would end soon ... However,
Gorbachev got all the economic support he dreamt of to keep his boat from
sinking. He received the political and emotional commitment of the US
Administration against those Russian liberals who have fought for an end to
Party rule. Washington's support is a powerful weapon for Mr. Gorbachev to
bring home for use against those who once trusted America to remain the
enemy of Communist Party domination ... Why did President Bush decide to
turn Malta into an instrument for the preservation of the Communist Party of
the Soviet Union? Surely Americans never realized the role Mr. Bush would play
in providing life support for the Soviet Communist Party, keeping it breathing
through more years of pain for the Soviet people."
(EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the 7th major round of American financing of the
Soviet leaders' oppression of their own people if you include the original
American financing of the Bolshevik Revolution. Is this what the establishment
means by "the merging of the interests of the US and USSR" and what Bush
means by his phrase "the new partnership"?)
E. The Neutralization of Western Europe and Demise of NATO
In addition to disarming the West, Gorbachev and his KGB and military
strategists have long had the goal of enticing Western Europe into neutrality,
eliminating NATO, and isolating, or at least greatly reducing, American influence
in Europe. A corollary to these goals is the linking up of Eastern and Western
Europe economically and politically via the European Community.
The beginning of the demise of NATO came when Reagan agreed to pull all of
America's intermediate range nuclear missiles (Western Europe's nuclear
umbrella) out of Europe under the terms of the INF Treaty. This sent a loud and
clear signal to Western Europe that America could no longer be counted upon to
defend the continent. It also played directly into the hands of the West German
Greens, and other pro-Soviet leftist anti-nuclear/disarmament groups all over
Europe, and undermined the already shaky position of the pro-defense
politicians in Western Europe.
Now, West Germany dominated by pacifists and anti-nuclear disarmament
activists, has agreed to cut its defenses 20%, and is pushing for reunification
with East Germany. (Only 30% of West Germans now approve of American
www.fatima.org

troops on their soil.) Although the Russians and East Germans are feigning
reluctance for reunification (a la Brer Rabbit "please don't throw me in the
briar patch"), that reunification will be the final stake in the heart of an already
faltering NATO Alliance. A reunified, or federated Germany, will quickly become
neutral, will drop out of NATO, and since West Germany is the anchor of NATO,
and the alliance will collapse shortly thereafter. For a time, France and England
will try to maintain independent viable nuclear and conventional military
deterrents, but the rest of Europe will follow Germany quickly into neutrality (a
stipulation Russia will demand and receive). England and France will move to
the left, Margaret Thatcher will be ousted, and the momentum of events will
move England and France, along with the rest of Western Europe, into
neutrality.
Already NATO members are cancelling billions of dollars in weapons
standardization programs because of the simultaneous declines in perceptions
of the Soviet threat and in Western defense budgets. With American leaders
now openly talking about pulling out 100,000 - 200,000 US troops (no longer
needed in the new post-Cold War era) the public and political will (or
motivation) to continue to support sizable defense expenditures will collapse all
over Western Europe, as it has in America and it will all happen, quite
literally, overnight (i.e., within 6 - 12 - 18 months). It's called the acceleration
factor. A US NEWS & WORLD REPORT article (11/27/89) sums it up pretty
well: "The Russians Aren't Coming With Peace Breaking Out, NATO Defense
Strategies Are In For A Shake-up." In short, over the next one to two years,
NATO will cease to be a military deterrent to the Soviet military might. The
political left in America and Europe want to convert NATO into an administrative,
and perhaps policing body to help implement the political union of Western
Europe in '92 and perhaps the union of Eastern and Western Europe over the
next 3 - 5 years.
All of this is calculated to reduce American influence in Europe and to increase
Soviet influence. After a decent interval of Western European disarmament and
economic buildup of the East by the West (e.g., 3 - 5 years), the Soviets will
begin to flex their military muscle by the mid-'90s. Then a disarmed Western
Europe will know who's boss the guys to the east with all the guns, tanks and
planes. The Soviet strategy will then shift to "operation intimidation" and a
neutralized, disarmed Western Europe will find itself in a subservient role to the
Soviets. In effect, Gorbachev is currently trading some control over Eastern
Europe for eventual de facto control over all of Europe East and West. How is
that for a brilliant chess move?

www.fatima.org

Our picture shows Cardinal Augustino Casaroli alongside his counterpart from
Moscow. This Cardinal has been the Celebrant attempting the wedding between the
Satanic and the Divine as the Chief proponent of the Vatican-Moscow Agreement.
This perfidious agreement betrays the Faith which as Catholics we are taught to
defend even against Cardinals as Cardinal St. Robert Bellarmine (Doctor of the
Church) teaches.
F. The Care and Feeding of the Bear
"The capitalists of the world and their governments, in the pursuit of conquest
of the Soviet market, will close their eyes to the indicated higher reality, and
thus will turn into deaf, mute, blind men. They will extend credits, and giving us
the materials and technology we lack, they will restore our military
industry, indispensable for our future victorious attack on our
suppliers. In other words, they will labor for the preparation for their
own suicide." - Vladimir Lenin.
"It is an odds-on bet that the Soviets are deliberately exaggerating their
current economic difficulties, so as to pressure the gullible West to come to
their financial rescue before the Soviet military-industrial establishment suffers
serious erosion." - Albert Jolis, Executive Director, The American Foundation for
Resistance International (11/89).
In addition to disarming the West, and neutralizing Western Europe, while
concurrently sabotaging the NATO alliance, the third major goal of the current
glasnost/perestroika campaign is to get America and the West to bail out the
Soviet Union economically. Lenin and all of his heirs down through Gorbachev
predicted that greedy Western businessmen would sell them the rope with
which they would hang us, and would sell their souls, their birthright, and even
their freedom for profits. Gorbachev intends for America, Western Europe and
Japan to take over the financial burden of Eastern Europe, to supply Russia with
www.fatima.org

massive credit, to pour in massive amounts of high technology, and to help

rebuild Russia's basket case agricultural and industrial infrastructure.
Gorbachev knows that the greatest allies he has in achieving his economic and
political goals are greedy American businessmen. Already they are pushing for
Most Favored Nation trade status, repeal of all restrictions on trade, high tech
transfers, joint ventures, etc. Pan Am Airways and Sheraton Hotels have teamed
up with Aeroflot and the city of Moscow to build two new hotels in Moscow.
Everything from Control Data computers to fiber optics to Pepsi Cola to
petrochemical and light bulb factories are now being sold into the Russian
market. Combustion Engineering is now erecting a $10 billion petrochemical
plant in the USSR, the largest US venture to date. Joint US/USSR ventures have
swollen from 200 to over 1,000 in the past 12 months.
But the businessmen in the US-USSR Trade and Economic Council want virtually
all US products (defense or otherwise) to be freed up for sale to Russia, and all
joint US/Soviet ventures to be taxpayer insured by the Overseas Private
Investment Corp. There is an unholy alliance between Bush and his
Administration and these multinational corporate and banking leaders, who, like
sharks smelling blood, are going into a feeding frenzy over the billions of dollars
in profits they plan to make in joint ventures and other deals in Russia and the
East bloc, where they see a market of 400 million people just waiting to be
exploited.
(EDITOR'S NOTE: Just as Bush and his establishment friends will do anything
for billions in profits from Soviet/US trade, so the Bush Administration has
quietly reopened all aid and trade channels with the People's Republic of China.
Thanks to the efforts of Bush, Baker, Kissinger, Nixon, Haig, etc., business is
back to normal with the butchers of Tiananmen Square.)
The US Congress has voted $934 million in US taxpayers' aid to Poland and
Hungary. Secretary of State James Baker has offered massive US financial aid
to East Germany. The 12 nation European Community has agreed to a large aid
package for Eastern Europe (e.g., Poland, East Germany, Hungary, and
Yugoslavia) and has signed a 10 year trade pact with the USSR to eliminate
trade quotas and increase technical aid.
The US Export-Import Bank is considering up to $10 billion in loans to the
Soviets. And THE NEW YORK TIMES has in an editorial (1/1/89) called on
President Bush to "Help Mr. Gorbachev Help The West" by making huge loan
guarantees and lift all trade and other restrictions.

G. Merger or Surrender: The Red Dawn Scenario

"There also exists another alliance at first glance a strange one, a surprising
one but if you think about it, in fact, one which is well grounded and easy to

www.fatima.org

understand. This is the alliance between our Communist leaders and your
capitalists." - Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
"We at the executive level here were active in either the OSS, the State
Department, or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and
without exception, we operated under directives issued by the White House. We
are continuing to be guided by just such directives, the substance of which were
to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the
United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet
Union." - Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation to Norman Dodd,
Chief Counsel of the Congressional Reese Commission Investigation of
Subversion in the Tax Free Foundations in 1953.
Toward a New World Order - Newsweek's (12/11/89) cover story "Super
Partners An Ambitious Game Plan For a New Era" says a lot about where we
are and where we are headed. For over fifty years, Eastern Establishment
insiders have talked about merger with the Soviet Union, about merging the
common interests of America and Russia, about world government, and more
recently, about the New World Order. In reading through several hundred
publications and over 500 articles for the preparation of this article, this writer
came across the terms "new world" or "new world order" at least 150 times.
This is no coincidence.
The agenda of the Liberal Eastern Establishment in America and Europe ever
since they helped finance the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, and helped to
finance the Soviets in the '20s, '30s, and '40s, right up through the present, has
been global government. This is obvious in studying the publications of the
CFR,* Trilateral Commission, and other establishment groups. They see the
Soviet Union as an important vehicle (or tool) to be used to help bring about
this world government or so-called "new world order". Soviet-backed
revolutions and the establishment of their own foreign policy machinations
against countries like China in the '40s; Cuba in the '50s; Iran, Nicaragua,
Rhodesia, and the Panama Canal give-away in the '80s; and South Africa, South
Korea, and Central America in the late 1980s and early '90s is all designed to
set the stage for world government in the 1990s.
South Africa will be one of the last major dominoes to fall to Communism (i.e.,
in 1 - 3 years), via an ANC Government; the United States of Western Europe is
to emerge in 1992; Eastern and Western Europe are to merge into one large
economic and political bloc, and the world government (New World Order)
dreamed of by Bush, Kissinger, Shultz, Brzezinski, Rockefeller, and their
establishment associates is supposed to emerge in the mid-to-late 1990s via a
global merger of the East and West.
A few minor wars (perhaps in Central America and/or the Middle East) are
envisioned along the way, to preoccupy and divert the attention of the masses,
but a government of, by, and for the elite is scheduled to emerge before the
www.fatima.org

year 2000.That is the establishment agenda; that is the New Age Movement
agenda. But this writer does not think that is the agenda of the Soviet Union. (It
should be remembered that the best laid plans of mice and men and elitists
sometimes go astray.)
*CFR is the Council on Foreign Relations
The Red Dawn Scenario - The Soviets have another agenda. It is called Red
Dawn. If one studies the writings of Lenin, Stalin, Manuiliski, Andropov, and
Soviet leaders right down through Gorbachev, one will conclude that the Soviet
leadership from 1917 to the present has never deviated from the
Marxist/Leninist goal of world domination. Capitalism in general and America in
particular are their number one enemy and obstacle to achieving this dream.
Western liberals and appeasers from Bush to Kennedy, from Kissinger to James
Baker, from Rockefeller to Armand Hammer (Lenin's old crony and far more
than just a "liberal") can keep telling us that "Communism is dead" that the
"Cold War is over", and that "Russia is now our partner". But the
Marxist/Leninist who runs the Kremlin, who runs the KGB, who runs the Soviet
military have never been stronger, nor more dedicated to the destruction of
America. The present retrenchment, retreat, and "humbling" of the Communist
bloc is simply the Communist dialectic (i.e., two steps forward, one back, then
two forward, etc.) in action, the 6th glasnost since 1921, and the greatest
strategic deception in modern (perhaps of all) history.
Proud, arrogant people are easy to manipulate, and America's Liberal Eastern
Establishment leaders are proud, arrogant men today, more so than ever,
because they believe they have their dream of world government almost
achieved, almost in hand. As such, they can be manipulated by the Communist
leadership for their own ends. From Lenin to Gorbachev, the Communist
leadership has talked of the necessity for using wealthy finance capitalists (e.g.,
like the Armand Hammers, the David Rockefellers, the Dwayne Andreas, and
thousands more) to help finance their world revolution. The Communist
leadership understands these mens' greed and lust for more and more wealth.
It also understands their lust for power, and world domination via their "new
world order", or global government, scheduled to emerge in the mid-'90s.
So, the Communist leadership, headed by Gorbachev is willing to go along with
their "new world order" schemes, with the reunification of Germany and then
Europe (albeit under neutral banners). That Communist leadership is willing to
grovel before their Western benefactors, and smile, and bow, and humbly admit
their mistakes and beg for forgiveness, and ask for financial and industrial
help to change their ways.
But at a point in time (this writer believes in the mid-'90s), the Soviets, the
greatest masters of deception in history, will launch their final drive for world
domination, will double-cross their liberal Western capitalist benefactors, and
will attack the United States of America. You see, they don't see the elitist "new
www.fatima.org

world order" crowd dominating the globe they see themselves dominating
through their overwhelming military might, through their stealth, their
deception, and their audacity. (Both historical and contemporary Soviet writers
and strategists have long said that they would attack us when we were at peace
with them.) That will be the beginning of the Red Dawn Scenario.
The ancient Greeks who sailed their fleet away from Troy, in defeat and
humiliation, leaving behind a gift, a war reparation, a giant wooden horse. A
proud and gullible Troy fell that very night. For example, (EDITOR'S NOTE:
History is replete with examples of such strategic deceptions and doublecrosses.
For example, an oriental ambassador, humbled by America's trade prowess in
the Pacific, bowed in humility before our proud and powerful President, seeking
conciliation and improved relations with America. Ten minutes later, his
Emperor's navy and air force was attacking our unprepared American fleet in
Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. For example, after signing a non-aggression
pact with Stalin in 1939, whereby Russia and Germany would carve up Poland,
Hitler double-crossed Stalin and abruptly turned and invaded Russia in 1941.)
The Red Dawn Scenario (made into a movie based upon an official US
Government strategic scenario) hypothesizes that: Western Europe goes
neutral, NATO collapses, Communist (Soviet) backed revolution sweeps through
the Caribbean Basin, Central America, and Mexico. America, weakened by three
decades of disarmament and appeasement, has its major Strategic Air
Command bases, missile sites, and naval ports (but not cities, for the most
part) about 400 targets in all (as estimated by Codevilla) nuked.
These nuclear missiles are launched from Soviet submarines currently a few
miles off of the US east and west coasts, from MIG fighter bombers launched
against the southeastern United States from Cuba, and across the polar ice cap.
America, of course, because of 25 years of disarmament treaties, has no
nuclear defense whatsoever. A feeble retaliation from a handful of US
submarines does minimal damage to a well-defended Soviet Union.
Within hours of the attack, the Soviets launch an airborne and armored invasion
into an undefended and disarmed United States through Alaska and Mexico.
This airborne/armored invasion by Russians, Cubans, Nicaraguans, and other
East bloc troops quickly cuts North America in half and the political survival of
America becomes problematic.
Is the Red Dawn Scenario plausible? - In this writer's opinion, and that of a
number of defense and intelligence analysts he knows, it is! The Soviet strategy
for the conquest of America has long been "internal demoralization, plus
disarmament, plus external encirclement, will lead to nuclear blackmail and
eventual surrender or conquest" Perhaps a George Bush, or his successor,
with a nuclear gun to his head, will simply surrender the present
www.fatima.org

"partnership" will reach a "new level of accommodation". Or perhaps the Soviets

will opt for Red Dawn. The point is the elements for the launching of a Red
Dawn Scenario are now moving into place.
These elements include: 1) vastly superior Soviet military strength vs. the US:
2) a neutral Europe and the termination of the NATO military alliance (which
secures Russia's western flank); 3) revolutionary Communist governments in
Cuba, Nicaragua, and eventually, throughout Central America and Mexico; 4)
larger standing armies in Cuba and Nicaragua than America now possesses; 5)
A very porous, undefendable border with Mexico stretching 2,100 miles from
Brownsville to Tijuana; 6) millions of Latin refugees in the southwestern US,
with millions more coming in each year thousands of these are KGB, DGI, or
other east bloc agents, spetsnaz, etc.; 7) a total absence of US air defenses
against submarine launched missiles (i.e., from Soviet subs on the US east and
west coasts, or the Gulf of Mexico), from Cuban or Central American based
aircraft, or from Russia across the polar ice cap; 8) huge stores of prepositioned conventional weapons in Cuba, Nicaragua, and, eventually,
throughout Central America and Mexico; 9) a sparsely populated and largely
undefended Alaska, virtually adjacent to the Soviet Union, and already (at this
writing), being infiltrated by Soviet agents and spetsnaz.

Conclusion
Very few Americans will be able to comprehend, accept, or will be willing to
believe the above analysis in this issue of MIA. The "peace propaganda" to the
contrary is enormous and overwhelming. We are the "Pollyanna people", we
want good news, not bad, and we love people who tell us what we want to hear
(like George Bush or Reagan), and we hate people who tell us what we don't
want to hear. Today, we hear our leaders telling us that "there will be peace in
our day", but the Bible warns us to beware when men cry "peace, peace, and
there is no peace." And 1 Thes. 5:3 says, "For when they say peace and safety;
then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with
child, and they shall not escape."

www.fatima.org

TO STOP THE PERSECUTION OF JESUS WORK AND PRAY FOR THE

CONSECRATION OF RUSSIA.
We know that Jesus said the devil is "a murderer and a liar from the
beginning" and that we can recognize his works "By their fruits you
shall know them". Millions of Christians are murdered, tortured and
imprisoned and harassed for their faith in Jesus Christ by the
Communist Russian regime and its allies. We can know that the Russian
Communist regime was set up by the devil (Karl Marx was a known
Satanist) to persecute the Church. The anti-Christ, this red beast of the
Apocalypse will only be defeated by the Woman clothed with the Sun
(Apoc. 12:1) that is Our Lady of Fatima will "Triumph" but only
through the Pope's and Bishops' obedience to the command to
consecrate specifically Russia to Her Immaculate Heart.
We know that Jesus is persecuted when His Church is persecuted,
because Jesus said to Saul who was persecuting the Church: "Saul,
Saul why do you persecute Me?" (Acts 9:4)
We live in an age of deception. Our leaders are deceiving us as they push us
into a world government, into the "new world order". The Soviets are deceiving
us as they feign peace, brotherhood, the end of the Cold War, and the death of
Communism even as they prepare for war. The Soviets are currently purging
the inefficiencies and deadwood from their system; building their economic
strength via massive Western financial/industrial infusions; trying to take out
the few remaining anti-communist countries (e.g., South Africa, South Korea,
the Philippines, Chile, Taiwan, El Salvador); neutralizing Western Europe and
NATO; "lulling the Americans to sleep with the greatest overtures of peace and
disarmament known throughout history"; expanding their military lead over
www.fatima.org

America; and getting prepared for the final onslaught against America in the
mid-to-late 1990s.
Will the "new world order" clique, or the Soviets, achieve their goal of world
domination in the 1990s? This writer doesn't think so. In spite of the greatest
emerging conflict between good and evil in perhaps all of history, the God of the
Bible, the God who created the universe is still in charge of history and
individual nations, as well as individuals' lives. As it has been said, "Man
proposes, and God disposes." This writer believes that at some point in the
midst of the coming chaos, that God will intervene* on the side of good and
against evil and that He will confuse the enemy. It is the duty of Americans to
be willing to take a stand for God and against evil in the period which lies ahead
and leave the results in His hand. As Edmund Burke once said, "All that is
necessary for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing."
And as Winston Churchill said in 1938, as he was trying to wake up the
apathetic, complacent British people, "The whole equilibrium has been
deranged, and the terrible words have been pronounced against the Western
democracies: Thou art weighed in the balance and found wanting. And do not
suppose that this is the end. This is only the beginning of the reckoning. This is
only the first foretaste of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us year by year,
unless by a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigor, we arise again
and take our stand as in the olden time."
*FATIMA CRUSADER EDITOR'S NOTE: Our Lady of Fatima said, "In the end, My
Immaculate Heart will triumph, the Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, it
will be converted and a period of peace will be given to the world."
It is only through the consecration of Russia by the Pope together with the
bishops in a solemn and public manner as Our Lady told Sister Lucia, that
Russia will be converted. If the Pope does not do it soon then the whole world,
including the U.S.A., (that part which is not annihilated in the process) will be
enslaved by Communist Russia.
. The Fatima Crusader and in various issues of World Enslavement or
Peace ... It's Up To The Pope This is fully explained in Father Gruner's book
The Acceleration Factor: Planet earth seems to be spinning faster and
faster with each week and month that passes as political, economic,
and monetary turmoil not only increases, but the rate of change
accelerates. It is not only the events which are taking place which are
significant, but the tremendous speeding up or acceleration of these
events which needs to be considered. It is said that man has amassed
more knowledge in the past 35 years than throughout all prior history.
One large super computer can store quantities of information
equivalent to thousands of years of prior knowledge and research, and
www.fatima.org

process more data than all former computers combined. Instantaneous

global communication today connects all points of the globe via
satellite and other high technology, so that all events everywhere can
be instantly known and viewed by everyone. A globe that once took
months to circle can now be traversed in hours and every square inch
of the planet can now be reached by destructive nuclear weapons
within fifteen minutes, each with more explosive power than the world
had seen in to prior to 1945.
The acceleration or snowball factor can be seen in the deteriorating
world debt pyramid where personal and business bankruptcies, S&L
and bank failures and Third World defaults are accelerating at a
breakneck pace. It can be seen in the incredible upheaval and change
in the Soviet Empire and in the accelerating communist revolutions in
Central and Latin America, South Africa, the Philippines, and the Middle
East. It can be seen in the stampede toward political, economic, and
monetary union in Western Europe; and in the plunge toward a New
World Order and "the merger of the common interests of the US and
USSR" (targeted for the mid-1990s by Bush and his globalist friends).
The acceleration factor can be seen in the rapid spread of the New Age
Movement which promises to usher in a global government by the year
2000 and in the explosion of the occult, satanism, and New Age
philosophy. In short, the world is careening toward incredible change,
convulsions, and chaos in the 1990s. While peace, prosperity,
brotherhood, and world government are being promised and sold to the
masses by American, Western, and Soviet leaders, this writer believes
that something quite different is approaching like a freight train out of
control. The 1990s will be the most chaotic and convulsive decade in
modern, or perhaps all of history. As David Hunt describes in his
excellent book on the period which lies ahead, it will be "peace,
prosperity, and then the coming holocaust".
Remember to watch not just what is happening, but the rate at which
those events are happening. It's called:
THE ACCELERATION FACTOR.

www.fatima.org