Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Non-Authentic Materials
Textual authenticity
Suitability of content
Compatibility with course objectives
Exploitability
(Lee, 1995)
Enas I. Al-Musallam
Enas I. Al-Musallam
3
Task authenticity reflects the purpose to which language input is put. It means that the
chosen tasks should involve the learners not only in authentic communication with texts
and others in the classroom, but also in learning and the purpose of learning.
Enas I. Al-Musallam
5
References:
Adams, T. (1995). What Makes Materials Authentic? (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 391389).
Bacon, S., & Finneman, M. (1990). A study of attitudes, motives, and strategies of
university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and
written input. Modern Language Journal, 74(4), 459-73.
Baird, K., & Redmond, M, (Eds.). (2004). The use of authentic materials in the K-12
french program. Winston-Salem, NC: Wake Forest University, Department of
Education.
Berardo, S. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The Reading
Matrix, 6 (2), 60-69.
Breen, M. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics 6, 60-70.
Guariento, W., & Morley. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT
Journal, 55 (4), 347 - 353.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Jacobson, E., Degener, S., & Purcell-Gates, V. (2003). Creating Authentic Materials and
Activities for the Adult Literacy Classroom: a handbook for Practitioners. NCSALL.
Kilickaya. F. (2004). Authentic materials and cultural content in EFL classrooms. The
Internet TESL Journal, 10 (7). Retrieved November 1, 2006 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kilickaya-AutenticMaterial.html
Kim, D. (2000). A qualitative approach to the authenticity in the foreign language
classroom: a study of university students learning English in Korea. Texas Papers in
Foreign Language Education, 5 (1), 189-205.
Lee, W. (1995). Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT
Journal, 49 (4), 323-328.
Macdonald, M., Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). The real thing?: authenticity and
academic listening. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 253-267.
Martinez, A. (2002). Authentic materials: An overview. Karen's Linguistic Issues.
Retrieved
October
25,
2006
from
http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/authenticmaterials.html
Mcknight, A. (1995). Pragmatics and TESOL: Using Authentic Language Data. Paper
presented at the Biennial Meeting of the MELTA International Conferencein
Innovations in Approaches to the Teaching and Learning of English, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia.
McNeill, A. (1994). What Makes Authentic Materials Different? The Case of English
Language Materials for Educational Television. Papers presented at the Annual
International Language in Education Conference, Hong Kong.
Miller, L. (2003). Developing listening skills with authentic materials. ESL Magazine, 6
(1), 16-19.
Miller, M. (2005). Improving aural comprehension skills in EFL, using authentic
materials: an experiment with university students in Nigata, Japan. Unpublished
masters thesis, University of Surrey, Australia.
Enas I. Al-Musallam
6
Taylor, D. (1994). Inauthentic authenticity or authentic inauthenticity? TESL-EJ, 1(2).
Retrieved November 1, 2006 from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESLEJ/ej02/a.1.html
Wong, V., Kwok, P., & Choi, N. (1995). The use of authentic materials at tertiary level.
EFL Journal, 49 (4). 318-322.
Enas I. Al-Musallam