50%(2)Il 50% ha trovato utile questo documento (2 voti)
369 visualizzazioni4 pagine
The effective schools research has largely ignored traditional organization theory. The school is responsible for providing the overall environment in which teaching and learning occur. The most crucial characteristics of a school are the attitudes and behaviors of the teachers.
Descrizione originale:
Titolo originale
NONTHEORETICAL INFLUENCES ON ORGANIZATIONAL THOUGHT ON.docx
The effective schools research has largely ignored traditional organization theory. The school is responsible for providing the overall environment in which teaching and learning occur. The most crucial characteristics of a school are the attitudes and behaviors of the teachers.
The effective schools research has largely ignored traditional organization theory. The school is responsible for providing the overall environment in which teaching and learning occur. The most crucial characteristics of a school are the attitudes and behaviors of the teachers.
NONTHEORETICAL INFLUENCES ON ORGANIZATIONAL THOUGHT
Academic theorizing is hardly the only force that develops our
understanding of educational organization and behaviour in them. two powerful and highly pragmatic emerging influences have largely ignored traditional organization theory you have substantially buttressed the kinds of thinking just described. One of these is the effective schools research, the other is the much larger , broader school reform movement that gathered momentum in the 1980s. Effective schools in research. The now-substantial body of research literature on effective schools had its origins in despair. In 1970s, big city schools were generally perceived as performing so badly that some were beginning to wonder, can big city high schools be made to work for the poor, ethnic minority students ? Do any big city high schools exist in which student achievement: level satisfactory ? And if they do what can we learn from them that will help us to improve other schools ? And analysis of the readingachievement test scores, some-albeit at the time , a few inner city high schools were clearly performing better than others. Findings of the effective school research. First a word of caution. Ever since the first research on effective schools began to appear in the literature in the 1970s, there have been repeated efforts to synthesize the findings and extract the essence of what it tell us. By the 1980s considerable agreement had emerged among students of effective schools research as to what the key findings were. Five basic assumptions of effective schools. First let us look at the basic assumptions that underline the concept of effective schools. 1. Whatever else a school can and should do, its central purpose is to teach: success is measured by the students progress in knowledge, skills and attitudes.
2. the school is responsible for providing the overall environment in which
teaching and learning occur. 3. Schools must be treated holistically: partial efforts to make the improvement that deal with the needs of only some of the students and break up the unity of the instructional program are likely to fail. 4. The most crucial characteristics of a school are the attitudes and behaviors of the teachers and other staff , not material things such as the size of the library or the age of the physical plant. 5. Perhaps most important , the school accepts responsibility for the success or failure of the academic performance of the students. Students are firmly regarded as capable of learning regardless of their ethnicity, sex, home or cultural background or family income . Pupils from poor families do not need a different curriculum, nor does their poverty excuse failure to learn basic skills. Stewart Purky and Marshall Smith assert, adding . Differences among schools do have an impact on student achievement and those differences are controlled by the school staff. Though one of the outstanding characteristic of effective school as is that they take responsibility for meeting the educational needs of the students to greater degree than their less-successful counterparts, this still a concept that many educational practitioners find difficult to accept. Especially in those schools seemingly overwhelmed. Thus the effective schools research suggest increased involvement of teachers and other staff members in decision making, expanded opportunities for collaborative planning, and flexible change strategies that can reflect the unique personality of each school. The goal is to change the school culture, the means requires staff members to assume responsibility for school improvement, which in turn is predicated on their having the authority and support necessary.. to create instructional programs that meet the educational needs of their students. Seeking an effective schools formula. The early effective schools research was quickly seized upon as the basis for developing programs for improving the performance of schools. Effective schools , ran that early message, share the following characteristics: Strong leadership by the principal High expectations for student achievement on the parts of the teachers and other staff members
An emphasis on basic skills
An orderly environment. Frequent and systematic evaluation of students, and Increased time on teaching and learning task
Emerging approach to effective schools . Pukery and Smith have identified
thirteen characteristics of effective schools from the reported research. They fall into two groups. The first group of nine characteristics can be implemented quickly at minimal cost by the administrative. They are: 1. School site management and democratic decision making in which individual schools are encouraged to take greater responsibility for, and are given greater latitude for educational problem solving. 2. Suppport from the district for increasing the capacity of schools to identify and solve significant educational problems ; this includes reducing the inspection and manage ment roles of central office people while increasing support and encouragement of school level leadership and collaborative problem solving. 3. Strong leadership which may be provided by administrator but also may be provided by integrated terms of administrators, teachers and perhaps others. 4. Staff stability, to facilitate the development of a strong cohesive school culture 5. A planned , coordinated curriculum that treats the students educational needs with the needs holistically and increases time spent on academic learning. 6. Schoolwide staff development that links the school organizational and instructional needs with the needs that teachers themselves perceive should be addressed; 7. Parental involvement particularly in support of homework, attendance, and discipline; 8. Schoolwide recognition of academic success , both in terms of improving academic performance and achieving standards of excellence; 9. Emphasize time on teaching and learning for example, reduce interruptions, stress primacy of focused efforts to learn, and restructure teaching activities. The second group of four characteristics that have great power to renew and increase effectiveness overtime. These four school characteristic are :
10. Collaborative planning and collegial relationships that promote feelings of
unity, encourage sharing of knowledge and ideas and foster consensus among these in the school; 11.Sense of community in which alienation both teachers and students- is to reduced and a sense of mutual sharing is strengthened. 12.Shared clear goals and high achievable expectations , which arise from collaboration , collegiality and a sense of community and which serve to unify those in the organization through their common purposes; 13. Order and discipline the bespeak the seriousness and purposefulness of the school as the community of people, students, teachers, and staff, and other adults, that is cohered by mutual agreement on shared goals, collaboration, and consensus. Clearly, the critical school characteristics listed in the second group are more complex, that those in the first group, more difficult to achieve and sustain overtime, yet they combine to produce great power to establish the improvement of educational effectiveness as a central focus of life within the school.